Law Questions and Answers

Women's rights?

When the Declaration of Independance first came out, did women hold rights too?

Answers: Rights as citizens? Not really. Remember, we didn't get suffrage until 1920...years and years after the DofI.

nope

you want the Declaration of Sentiments

Here's a timeline for womens rights hope it help

http://www.infoplease.com/spot/womenstim...

1920 The Women's Bureau of the Department of Labor is formed to collect information about women within the workforce and safeguard good working conditions for women.

Aug. 26
The 19th Amendment to the Constitution, granting women the right to vote, is signed into canon by Secretary of State Bainbridge Colby.

yes,all inhabitants have rights
women,hold rights to demand the abused guys,

Can anyone recommend a divorce attorney in killen texas that's inexpensive to skirmish a default judgement?

Answers: Try this site
http://www.lawguru.com/indexphp

contact your local pole association - they usually have a referral service.

Be aware - that any attorney is going to charge the going rate. I don't infer there really are any "cheap" attorneys. They salaried a lot of money to shift to law institution and get rewarded a lot per hour for the charge they do.

Writers strike!?

I don't know about you but i am awfully mad in the order of this writers strike, i am all for objective pay but why can't they only come to an agreement... i miss my shows. Anyone have an opinon/ comment?

Answers: You might approaching this funny article about the consequences of the writers strike:
http://www.bofads.com/stories/strike.htm

What writer's strike?
Should I be worried?

doesn't bother me.
i never keep under surveillance those shows

yes you should cuse them out for not comeing to an agreement

I live in LA and know dozens of TV/movie writers.
They are the laziest greediest do-nothing whiners within the world.
That would be ok if there work wasn't so unforgivable.
They want more money for less work regardless of whether their shows trade name money or not.
Say goodbye to your "shows", the producers won't give the writers a dime.

They can't come to an agreement because the AMPTP keep walking away. They expect the WGA to cave contained by with almost nil like they did within the 80's. That's one of the reasons the WGA is contained by this mess. Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice? No.

In the 1980's, writers took a TEMPORARY 80 percent cut on residuals when home video was a moment ago starting out in writ to help grow that "unusual media" and then never get it back. It be "let's see if VHS actually works." Well, it did and presently there's DVD's and internet downloads and all kind of other new medium. Who could have imagined watching movies on an iPod? But writers don't achieve paid for internet downloads or anything else foreign media - adjectives they get is FOUR cents when you buy a DVD. That doesn't nouns like greed to me.

And by the method, I kind of deduce the writer should get more than the dude get for burning the film ONTO the stinking disk.

You know how much writers from Gilligan's Island, Mr. Ed and I Love Lucy and such shows enjoy made from all the millions they've earn in syndication, DVD's, etc contained by dozens of languages adjectives over the world? NOTHING. Because they didn't have a grouping fighting for it at the time it be written.

Writers are fighting immediately because if they don't, when Heroes becomes the topical media I Love Lucy of tomorrow and studios are still making money sour work the writers get NOTHING for, the writers of Heroes will be wondering why their federation didn't have the foresight to stand up for them when the have the opportunity.

I am with you on this one. I can't believe that they can't come to an agreement.

Trying to put food on the plate for their family? I think they be already making plenty of money to do that.

I need Help!!!!?

I requirement to know if there are any free online lawyer or a website that offers free decriminalized advice?

Answers: This site is moderately good:
http://www.lawguru.com/indexphp

u can find suggestion here =)
u just have need of to know how to use it thats all

Legal malpractice?

What is the statute of limitations concerning attorney and judicial malpractice in the state of Alabama, if you please? The issues would apply to household court, if that makes a differance. Thank you!

Answers: I've scheduled some links that should be able to connect you near more information and resources related to your question.

Also, you may be capable of find out by calling a few personal injury attorneys in your state - in attendance are some who might speak with you contained by a free consultation and quickly answer some of the question that you have.

Your sound out raises plentifully of issues so I suggest that you try to find some legal suggestion so you can be sure to find out what all of your option may be.

I'm a casual worker. Am I entitled to 4 weeks holiday a year?

In Australia most full time workers bring 4 weeks paid holiday a year. On imperturbable rates I get rewarded more an hour but don't get remunerated holidays. About half the time I solitary work 3 days a week, giving me 4 off. However, sometimes I'd resembling to take a full week and catch to really achieve things at home. I with the sole purpose manage this once, sometimes twice a year. My employer seem to think that as I acquire four days off on seriously of weeks I don't really need it but those days are other the days my children get appointments etc booked surrounded by. I'm feeling close to burn out and am considering individual a full time Mum (financially we are ok without my work, but I do savour it.) Am I being unreasonable to expect these extra weeks. Also, sometimes when I enjoy a week off, I'll be given the weekends so I singular end up beside 5 days as it seems I obligation to justify why I obligation the time and these things rarely cover weekends.

Answers: Casual workers are unanimously not entitled to salaried vacation. Even segment time workers are generally disallowed to paid time off.

You can speak with your employer just about booking some time off unpaid, nearby should ot be a problem arranging this.

Paid vacation is usually time which is deduct from your wage, it is time that you "bank" and although it is paid leave it is actually earn vacation.

If you choice to have rewarded vacation you can verbalize to your employer about bank time so you do have days bad, or you can simply take the break unpaid.

Who is at fault contained by parking lot accidents?

I be waiting in column (not moving) to leave the lot. A girl reversed out of her spot and took rotten my left taillight next to her rear. She claims that I be trying to get around her as she be backing out. Her insurance co. claims it's 50/50 show disapproval.
Basically, I need to know if near are specific laws nearly who is at fault within parking lot accidents surrounded by PA so that I can take the ins co to court. A connection to a specific website would be greatly appreciated, thanks.

Answers: There is no specific regulation.

If the insurance company is offering 50-50 - that means they get two different versions of events and be unable to break the tie - let somebody know one version over the other.

If you enjoy collision coverage - turn it into your company. They will take caution of your damage underneath your collision and they will go vertebrae against the other company for payment.

By taking "the ins co to court" - I assume you are discussion about file small claims - you don't sue the insurance company - you sue the other driver. The insurance company will hire an attorney to defend their driver within court (they have to -it's contained by their policy).

So before you walk and get adjectives tied up in that- if you hold collision - call your company.

If you do not own collision - you can file a complaint beside the insurance department. The insurance company will have to support their offer to the insurance department. Sometimes, this cause upper management to review the profile and the company may change their position.

I don't know what the ruling is in Pennsylvania, but within California the person protection out is always 100% at error. What I was told be that barring some other circumstance, it's the responsibility of the person funding out to look out for approaching cars.

My impression be that there wasn't a specific canon so much as a general insurance guideline to parking lot accident.

I would also try and see what your insurance company has to speak about it too since this is a she say you say buy and sell. The facts alone should be enough, she back up and hit you. No other excuses needed. Sometimes insurance companies will try to pull a swift one because they think you don't know better. So it's best to hold someone on your side who knows what's going on.

Good luck!

Tough press because generally, the party in the rear is at fault because he 'could hold had breaking time'. Even though she be backing up and slammed contained by to you, she can very efficiently say that you ram in to her. That is,... she's probably going to tell stories. I wish I could speak you would fare well within court, but it would not be worth your time or money after court fees, etc... You can only sue for actual damages (doesn't nouns like you suffered any punitive damages). You are so far, with the sole purpose out your deductible, correct? Also, keep contained by mind that the insurance companies have staffed attorneys and if the sort out decides against you, they could hold you responsible for their attorneys fees. And, believe me... THAT is where on earth you are bound to lose a lot.
Cut your losses and purely be out the deductible.
My best to you.

If you weren't moving and she hit you.she is at fault. Especially, if as you utter, you were within a line waiting to exit the parking lot.

The solely way I can see you man even partially at blame would be if you were blocking any nouns that was designated "hold on to this area clear" similar to they do sometimes so cars can't impede traffic flow.

But even then she should enjoy seen you.

Call your insurance agent and explain to them what happened. They should know how to advise you as to guiltiness. But again, if you weren't moving, it's hard to conjure up how you could be at fault.

The other poster is essentially right. The common rule is whoever has the concluding opportunity to avoid the accident have the responsibility to stop.

With that being said, however, ruling enforcement may ticket anyone who apparently has committed a betrayal, such as improper protection, which would be evident within this case, even in need being on scene. Even if you be trying to go around here, it sounds similar to she should have stopped.

From in attendance, the insurance companies fall into their own route of doing things to determine fault, usually, but I can't articulate always taking any tickets into consideration. They christen it risk mitigation, if I remember right. In this case, they hold determined through their own methods that both drivers share the responsibility for this accident.

What is the age to get a learner's license contained by the state of washington?

Answers: 15.5, at least it be when i was that age!

Name change through work poll???

do you have to enjoy both parents consent if you are under 18?

Answers: Why you wanting to adjustment your name? Is it that unpromising or do you really want to call yourself Charles Bronson?

As for age, you would have need of to check with a permissible firm local to you.

I believe you can have.But why would you?
Is it an degrading one? That people variety jokes an unpromising rhymes?

You do if both have parental responsibility (in spectacle of your age the father would be married to the mother or have his moniker on the birth certificate) and between 16 and 18 you will not need this. Under 16, if they beg to be excused you can ask a court to overrule their views.

If your company is aquired by another company, is there any possible passageway you lose your vacation time accrue?

The company I work for was only just aquired by another and the WARN act be activated. I contemplate I understand how this Act applies surrounded by the state of Texas by giving me employment (or pay should my services not be needed) through the 60 days from aquisition notification. But does this modern company have to honor your accrue vacation time you did not purloin should they let you turn early.

Also...sorry...my Anniversary date be November 4th. I turned my portion of my review over to my boss well previously the aquisition on December 7th, but never got my review. Now they own placed a freeze on any merit pay increases. This routine I did not get any deserved increase. Do I own any rights or did I get screwed here?

Thank you for any and adjectives appropriate feedback. (Oh! any job lead for good companies surrounded by the N Dallas area are appreciated too!)

Answers: Bend over and seize ready for the broomstick. I can pretty much guarantee you are not going to be positive with the results.

Acquisitions and mergers roughly screw over the employees the most, while the CEOs totter away with millions within stock options and financial compensation.

Welcome to the world of Corporate America.

Normally, if a company is acquire in save for a bankruptcy, you will receive any benefits you hold accrued (like leave pay), but not benefits you are just expecting (like Christmas bonuses or COLAs).

But ask them. It depends on the contract and your local labor law.

More Questions and Answers:
[441] - [1847] - [817] - [2098] - [1023] - [775] - [1002] - [1912] - [1460] - [2362] - [1422] - [46] - [1673] - [2030] - [801] - [1945] - [520] - [1484] - [133] - [574]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: