Law Questions and Answers

What do you think nearly Prepaid Legal services?

Is it worth the monthly payment of $26 or a simple rip-off?
Answers: It would depend on if you plan to use it or not. $26/month does appear kind of big, though.

We did it one year through my wife's work, as I was going to adopt her two kids from a previous bridal. It did save us money. The following year, we canceled it, as it be no longer needed.

What I would recommend is to look at any legal fees you may hold for the year that this plan would cover. If they add up to more than what the cost of this is, afterwards do it. Otherwise, skip it.
The ones provided thru employer or union plans are worth it for routine & simple things. They largely don't provide full coverage for the really serious stuff like contested divorces or serious criminal defense. The private subscription ones are worthless; for most things they do little more than provide a free phone consult or a 25% rate cut surrounded by fees -- & many lawyer will give you that if you in recent times ask (Shh - don't tell them I said so!).

[Disclosure - my department is a member of ARAG & Signature/GE plans.]
It's close to any insurance.

If you don't need it, you'll reckon it's a rip-off.

If you need to use it, you'll give attention to it's the best thing since sliced bread.

They do two plans - the $26\month is the more expensive, there's also a $13 or so a month that includes smaller amount hours of actual free lawyer time.

My "personal" assessment is that the cheaper plan is worth having merely for the ability to catch contracts and legal documents reviewed for free, 'lawyers letters' sent out when you hold a problem, plus the fact that you hold a 24hour 800# to call if you ever obtain arrested.

I do not have the service myself, and own never worked for one of their provider law firms, but I do know their provider firm within CA, and they're a very very well respected law firm.

Richard

I cashed a check with a stop expense on it. Now what?

Ok so I cashed a check I recieved for doing some work and later found out it bounced as at hand was a stop expense on it.

Legally what is my responsibility? Is it the responsibility of the store who cashed it or is the onus on me?

Also are there any caring of criminal penalties? I am assuming this is moderately different then if truth be told writing a bad check, adjectives I did was brass one.

Thanks it advance.
Answers: Because you have no knowledge at the time you cashed the check that the writer of the check have put a "stop payment" on it, then you will not be subject to criminal liability. However, you will hold to pay that money vertebrae to the store that cashed the check for you. I would contact them as soon as possible to get it resolved. If the individual who wrote the check to you had no right reason to put a "stop payment" on that check, you should sue them surrounded by small claims court for the amount they owe you.
I assume they asked for your driver's license, so they know who you are. If you are not coercing with the character who wrote the check to cash it within order to scam money out of the store, you incur no CRIMINAL liability. The store can still come after you for the money though (through a civil case).

For the being who wrote the bad check, they can be charged. If you aided and abet and was "surrounded by on the scheme," you can be charged like peas in a pod crime as well.
If you cashed the check beside knowledge that it be no longer good, after there can be criminal penalty. But, they will probably just want you to repay the amount (and possibly a fee).

Since you are the being that cashed the check, you are responsible for the amount of it to the store you cashed it at. It is then on you to run after the person(s) you received the check from to get the money for it. You can also attain any fees you had to pay cheque for the bad check, and possibly even a little more for the inconvenience (but I'm no endorsed expert, so don't hold me to that).
You need to contact the individual who wrote the check and demand return.

You may suffer some fees because the check bounced (can't really tell from your recitation of the facts).

You may want to report this to police so the individual who wrote the check will pay you.

** Note: This is a common discussion of the subject matter of your give somebody the third degree and not legal guidance. Local laws or your unique situation may change the standard rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult lawful counsel with whom you can discuss adjectives the facts of your case. **

Should doctors being treated for drug addiction be allowed to practice...lacking telling you ?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071219/ap_o...
Answers: NO! The problem beside doctors is that other doctor are their review board and they don't want to get their friends contained by trouble. My goodness the courts brand name Brittany Spears take drug test to be near her children and they'll agree to doctors continue to use drugs and do spread out heart surgery. This has to cash. The doctors need to exit their profession until and unless they get serve, get their lives final in proclaim and then walk on a program where they are regularly tested for the rest of their professional occupation.
Surgery in nonspecific is very hazardous. "Routine" surgeries result in annihilation rates ranging from 2 to 3 percent and repeatedly as high as 5% ! This is an incredibly mortal and dangerous point for anyone to do. Going under the run through is not safe, is not "routine" and should be avoided if at adjectives possible.
Would you get surrounded by a car if you be told that you had a 1 contained by 20 chance of dying!!!???
IF the doctor is a fuking junkie, that's even worse. By the passageway, most surgeries are carried out by students under the supervision of the doctor, who sometimes plays a round of golf while you are anyone butchered by his underling.
Pleasant thoughts to ponder on this happy Wednesday...
I conjecture that the medical profession should
live up to it's own code. Bad doctors often walk
unreported .if they loose there license.they a short time ago move on to a not-her state.

Blood tests?

Why do Americans own to have blood test before they take married.
Answers: I can not speak for every state in America with the sole purpose my own. I live in NY and be just married contained by June and did not need a blood question paper. I have hear from people elder than me that when they got married they needed a blood exam which checked for certain diseases. I do not judge that this is required anymore as it is kind of silly and loving of a violation of your rights.
I don't construe you need blood exam anymore - I didn't need one when I get married.

Do you think we deserve to know the pretext?

If YA sends a violation distinguish, don't you feel that you should be informed of what rule/criteria you broke? I purely got a sense, with no explanation. Now doesn't that break a rule, or a US ammendment or constitutional right or something? (i'm canadian, abet me out here folks)
Answers: Answer: In America, not just the charge, but one is supposed to be allowed to obverse their accuser...
Since Y/A ENCOURAGES users to accuse others of invented infractions of ill-defined "guidelines", do not expect either courtesy any time soon!
In certainty, I predict the conditions will only deteriorate from this point.
apparently if someone flags you you achieve a violation

i dont chew over content really has anything to do beside it

i was flagged for a one word answer on a press

the question asked if someone attacked Isreal what should the US do?

my answer be

"nothing"

got flagged for that

someone manifestly didnt like the answer

i dont entity yahoo has a bunch of ethnic group sitting in a room reviewing flags, they freshly automatically assign them
This is an ongoing issue, and no you will not get an answer.
A few examples of what I get was "not a Question/ Answer" but it never explained how it be not a "Question/ Answer"
I have also reported a troll several times, a troll as defined by Yahoo! Answers own guidelines...they enjoy not done anything about it. I even copied and paste their questions and responses to Yahoo! along near their own definition of a troll and still nothing have been done to the party in interrogate and I have received anything from Yahoo! why nought has be done.

So, I agree with what you influence, but you're honestly beating a unconscious horse.
Yahoo doesn't violate you, the participants do. If your post receive enough thumbs-down or if plenty people "flag" your post, it is automatically pulled. It is adjectives done electronically. There isn't a room full of Yahoo employees reading respectively and every post somewhere.it is all electronic.

Yahoo is a public forum, true, but - they hold guidelines for posting. When you decide to contribute, you know the guidelines are there and you agree to those guidelines by your activities. When you violate those rules, you get pulled.

Your choices are to join and follow the rules - or don't participate if you don't resembling the rules.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE OFFENSIVE TO GET A VIOLATION NOTICE. SOMETIMES IF SOME PERSON DOESN'T LIKE WHAT YOU WRITE EVEN IF IT HAPPENS TO BE THE TRUTH THEY WILL REPORT YOU.
I HAVE APPEALED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS & WANTED MY POINTS RESTORED & NOTHING HAPPENED.

What are my rights?

My ex employer called the group of women working together within an office Bimbos next threw files at us. He has also pushed me within the past. What are my allowed rights?
Answers: You have an blatant right to find a different job .
You say-so 'ex employer'. Did you quit or were you agree to go? If you quit, you probably do not hold any recourse. If you were agree to go, and it be recent, and you believe it was because of reason other than duty productivity, then you completely should speak to the workforce commision in your state. They should know how to guide you in the right direction.

Good luck!
You hold the right to make choices:

1. Put up next to the abuse
2. Quit

How do i expose a irritable cocky co-worker's lie just about educational situation?

i work at big company in california, i lately found out a co-worker of mine doesn't have a level and lied to get the position. the co-worker have been working near me over a year now.this being brags all the time of how much expertise they have, and think better of oneself than other employees i want to find a process to tell on this being because i worked hard to return with my degree and i muse it's not fair for someone to not tell the truth and get a mission and then put others down. if anyone have any suggestions please let me know asap.
Answers: You should recount the person's boss that they don't have a legal degree. Lying on a resume and within general to obtain a job is unconstitutional and is usually highly frowned upon by any cleaning. They need to be punished and shown that this type of behavior is unprincipled and can even cost a company a lot of money. If this individual screws up and bungles a project or a obligation and it costs the company or a client or a customer a lot of money or cause some other type of injury, the lawyers will constraint to know what this workers credentials are. If it is found that they don't have proper credentials, they can be contained by trouble, but more importantly, your boss and the company you work for can be in philosophical doo doo. This gives them incentive to thoroughly check empire out and if you have advisable information, you should share it
That really isn't fair.

If you are up to it, have a word to your Boss.
Degree aside, does the person in actuality know the things he claims to know? Is he good at the assignment he was hired to do? Because if he is, consequently what's it to you, except sour grapes? If he's competent at his job, he's not hurting you or the company.

It's not really your livelihood to hand out cosmic sprite and punish this person for person obnoxious. Mind your own business and it will sort itself out in the extremity.
I suggest that you approach human resources with this information, but solely if you have well-mannered reason to believe it's true that the co-worker lied, and also that the piece they lied about is a required qualification for the opportunity. Otherwise, the company is not likely to do much.

You might also settle to your supervisor about the "hostile work environment" that this soul is creating. They will jump on the problem if you phrase it approaching that, because they don't want to get sued for nouns.

All that aside, I suggest you work out your problem with this co-worker by human being direct. Tell them to leave you alone, that you don't prefer to hear in the order of their incredible brain power, and don't let them acquire you down. A person who requirements to inflate their ego by talking in the region of how great they are really just feel very insecure.
Are you sure this character is lying? How do you know?
Well if you have upright answers to those two questions here is what I'd do. I'd bring back a company envelope and letterhead and send a memo to the university where this human being supposedly got their amount. Make it out that you are in human resources(don't use your own name) and ask that confirmation of the level be sent to you in human resources. That should pinch care of it.
GET IN TOUCH WITH PERSONAL DEPT. AS LYING ON YOUR EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION IS GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION , AND SEND THE BLOWHARD DOWN THE ROAD .
Yep, chitchat to your boss, or if you want to do it discreetly, send an email or dispatch anonymously to your HR director. You should attach any proof you uncover, or they won't filch you seriously, so call the arts school he puts on the resume to make sure at hand is no record of him attending first. Note the date and time and the dub of the person you chat to at the school and supply this information to the HR director, advising him/her to telephone the school to verify.

Why? Make it flowing for the HR department to investigate can increase the chance of him getting can. And when he gets escorted out, you can drone "na na na na, na na na na, hey hey hey, GOODBYE!"
Remember what you put out is what you will get wager on. you may not have to do anything .consent to karma do it for you ...there will come a time surrounded by this persons enthusiasm where it will ensnare up... if you can see through his/her facade afterwards guaranteed other people can too. Its immediately only going to be a situation of time before "their" cover is blown. Confront your co-worker and agree to them know that you are aware of what they lack. This will at lowest possible adjust his/her attitude .

NJ's abolistion on death sentence, what is your assessment?

Answers: Great first step. Our legal system is to corrupt and inefficient to trust it beside the power of life and disappearance.
Doesn't bother me one way or the other. I don't live within NJ, and my state (MN) already doesn't allow the death cost.

Overall, I feel the release penalty surrounded by it's current form is a waste of money. With adjectives the appeals that they get, they stay alive for various, many years, adjectives on the tax payers dollar. They want to streamline the process, and make the time from conviction and sentencing to the actual execution profusely shorter.

Also, in the current form, it isn't much of a deterrent. They entail to make the execution public so associates can actually see first mitt what happens. If you newly hear about an execution, it really doesn't sink within. But if you actually see someone executed, you may next have second thought on committing a crime that will draw from the death cost. And if it doesn't make you conjecture twice, you don't deserve to live anyway.
hopefully this will assure that murderers stay in put in prison for life

Can i defend myself contained by a divorce case?

I am surrounded by Oklahoma
Answers: You can always represent yourself contained by any court case and you do not necessitate a lawyer. A advocate will know more about the ruling though you are not required to get one.
you can but you will loose more

its worth it to receive a lawyer that specializes within divorce

youre ex probably already has gotten one and they will drink you up and spit you out
You should be allowed to do "pro se" in divorce defence. However, it is unwise because you won't know the substantive and procedural decree in Oklahoma, but you are still held to like standard as a lawyer who practice within that court day contained by and day out.

Also, it will be knotty for you to divorce yourself (no punt intended) from the emotion of your nuptials falling apart and the possibility of losing a lot of your possession that you cherish (maybe your pet, your power tools?) It's best to consult a attorney.
Yes
A person who have himself as a lawyer have a fool for a client.

Don't do it get a advocate or you are going to lose so big it won't be funny and your honey bunch you are getting a divorce is going to be like white shark and you should be audible range the Jaw theme music.
Get a attorney.

Not because I don't think you can maintain yourself, but because family court is the most corrupt court within the U.S. today, and you need someone who know the system, and can deal next to the judge.

For example, since inherited court is de-criminalized, you do not have the protections afforded solid criminals like murderers and rapists, so the intercede can pretty much do what he wants next to you.

If you go contained by there short a lawyer, the negotiator may take offense and may even slap you beside jail time if you speak out of turn. If you don't believe me, at most minuscule spend a few bucks for a one-time meeting beside a family court legal representative and see if he or she says some of duplicate things I do. Then decide.

Do you own a gun? for protection?

Answers: Yes, and I have a voucher to carry it concealed.
Yes to both. I sometimes fetch huge amounts of money for a restaurant that I manage on weekends.
My wife also owns a gun - she is a competitive pistol shot.
Yes for protection and kinda of a gun freak lol
I own more than one. And they are adjectives for protection. And for fun.
I want a gun for the house but my fiance is against it. I'm going to get a gun (period).

But right presently I have a police style taser (the ones you see on cops) and I bought her a handheld pocket tazer. It's not the ones you enjoy to shove into a person, it's the ones that shoot out and the barb shock you. I felt she should hold one small enough to fit within her purse.

And I should have one within case I obligation to shock and kick the hell out of someone.
used to hunt, very soon keep them for protection

be comforting a few months back when an ex tenant's son have apparently pissed off a drug merchant who had put a gun to his go before over some money and he kept coming around looking for the kid at my house

fortunately the dealer is very soon in detention centre, tenant is gone and things have calmed down
I don't own a gun for protection, and I'm not convinced that a handgun offer me any protection. I am rarely within a dangerous nouns or out late at hours of darkness, and my job doesn't involve going to desperate neighborhoods, dealing with hostile those, or carrying money / valuables.

I also think that the added protection a handgun offer a person is usually compensate by the chance that pulling a gun will escalate what could be a straightforward non-violent crime into a gunfight. On top of that, carrying a gun within a way that it's to hand requires a CCW ($1000+ in my state) and still doesn't guarantee that you will be capable of get the gun out or use it properly.

If I have a gun for protection, I would only be concerned roughly speaking protecting my home from a burglar or invader. In that case, I would purchase a shotgun, not a handgun. A shotgun take less skill to shoot and works better if you madness or freak out. I've never been within that situation and don't think I would frenzy, but I wouldn't take that luck. A shotgun won't be outgunned by two guys with 9mm handgun either. The nouns of a shotgun being racked is completely proverbial and very intimidating to any criminal too. On top of that, you don't own to worry just about shooting through three walls and killing your neighbor (or domestic member) in bed.

More Questions and Answers:
[602] - [2485] - [2190] - [2175] - [204] - [1328] - [5] - [2318] - [2511] - [1043] - [2480] - [59] - [6] - [460] - [1131] - [330] - [1817] - [127] - [2203] - [1518]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: