Law Questions and Answers
How many lives does a seatbelt gather a year? According to whom?
Answers: I'm not 100% sure, but I'll try to supply you with some information.
http://www.autoliv.com/alv/connect/Home/...
http://www.safetycenter.navy.mil/seasona...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jYiVhzB3...
http://www.saferoads.com/vehicles/seatbe...
Check nsta.gov or the National sanctuary council for statics. I was an EMT for 10 years, and I can relay you without a doubt that seatbelts recover a lot of lives. Google communication for ejection deaths, for example.
A lot of relations in accident in suvs are ejected. Ejection is almost other fatal. If they have been wearing their seatbelts, they would not own been ejected. They might still own died, but the chances are much, much lower.
Usually none, unless that seatbelt is surrounded by a car specifically in a potentially brutal crash. If you are asking, "How many lives DO SEATBELTS liberate a year?", that is a different examine and not much fun to answer.
What Can I do to recover Costs?
I have been accuse of burglary, but the evidence and witnesses proved I was nowhere essential the place. I had over $13,000 within attorney fees and additional lost wages of roughly speaking $5,000. Is there anything I can do to recuperate these costs and start damage control on my reputation from the lies and rumors that be started because of this?Answers: You might be able to bring a charge of slander or libel if a private being was the one who dishonestly accused you of the crime. If the police accuse you, you can't sue them because their actions are priviliged.
At lowest you were acquit, so even though it is hard, you should verbs if you have no skin to bring. You can tell everyone that you be found innocent of all charges.
Dana (attorney)
You may consider bring a horrid prosecution action against your accuser.
Typically, to prevail surrounded by a malicious prosecution claim against another, you must show: (1) That they instigated criminal process against you, such as by swearing out a warrant, (2) That they have no probable cause for instigating that process, and (3) That you received a non-detrimental outcome to you at court.
"Probable cause" for reporting the crime is one and the same standard as the cops would have contained by arresting you. It is legally defined as "a likely ground in reality and circumstance for a belief in the existence of positive circumstances (as that an offense has be or is being committed, that a soul is guilty of an offense, that a particular explore will uncover contraband, that an item to be seized is contained by a particular place, or that a specific reality or cause of deed exists) when supported by probable cause, warrantless flush of vehicle may extend to every part of vehicle where on earth objects of search might be concealed" <i>State v. Nixon</i>, 593 N.E.2d 1210 (1992).
Some slang: When there's probable cause there's "lawful malice", i.e. they instigator may not have have malice or spite towards you, but his/her arrangements will still be considered "malicious" for all intents and purpose surrounded by a malicious prosecution claim. If singular legal hatred is present, then a plaintiff can get better only compensatory damages--a pure monetary reclamation equal to the harm done measured by dollars and cents. However, if a plaintiff can show "actual malice", he/she will know how to recovery punitive damages against the instigator, an new amount meant to punitive the defendant and deter similar behavior.
"Actual Malice" can be the dictionary definition of bad feeling: ill-will, spite, hatred, etc. But it can also be "a willful disregard for the rights of others". An extreme example is within an old Virginia crust where a defendant, trying to collect on a debt, chased down the plaintiff contained by his car, run him over, and kept people from helping him. When he get to court, the defendant claimed that his actions be nothing personal, that he only just wanted money that he feel was owed to him. Although the court didn't disagree beside his statement, they still found malice because he wilfully disregarded the plaintiff's rights.
Defamation claims may also be valid, but are rock-hard cases. Since truth of an alledgely false assertion is a defense against the claim, the opponent can drag you through the mud adjectives over again in court. Also, since mar to your reputation is the measure of damages, you may not get better much if you're unkown or infamous anyway.
You'll also want to consider if the person who falsy accuse you has assets and income you can collect on.
You may also want to look for statutory remedies surrounded by your jurisdiction and consult with a legal representative licensed therein for how these general legitimate principals apply to local laws and your extraordinary facts. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND DOESN'T FORM AN ATTORNEY CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YOU AND ME.
If I am currently pending investigation for a felony can I still find a California Ins. Agents License?
Answers: Just ahappened to be reading the licensure requirements for psychologists in CA previously today.
For psychologists, a conviction is needed, and it needs to be final - as within past any appeal stage.
But a plea negotiate waiving the right to appeal may be adequate.
Reference was made to Ca code governing other professions as probably similar.
You aren't convicted of anything, so technically you are still innocent and yes, you can - however, if you hold any doubt at all that you may be convicted - I suggest you don't bother, as it will be revoked anyway. Take aid of your legal trouble first.
What would you do when?
What do you do when your marriage have become stressed and is at risk because of a lot of conflict about lawsuit that's against the both of you?What do you do when the character suing is a famous and success surgeon?
What do you do when the attorney that you've got doesn't watch over you and/or isn't strong enough to and change his mind a lot but all the same you can't afford him let alone go and get a different one?
What do you do when you just want to move away from it adjectives and sell your house but you can't because it's still an stretch out case and it involves our capably water and resourcefully pump electricity being possibly shut down?
What do you do if you don't own enough money to hook up to rural dampen or drill a new resourcefully and end up have no money or household/outdoor water surrounded by the end?
What do you do when they hold threatening to bring another lawsuit against you?
What do you do when a tough situation are suppose to make your relationship next to your spouse stronger but really hurts it?
Answers: pray.
get a psychiatric therapist
get a honourable lawer
take a break
turn to the spa
consoul in freinds and domestic
and live tomorw, its a brand new year
(and probly a better one without him)
dont tolerate him run your life! formulate your own decisions
and if he dosnt wanna engender ends meet
afterwards get out of the relashionship
1) We move about to therapy.
2) If the surgeon have a real claim against us, afterwards we settle the case. If his lawsuit if frivolous, I notify him to piss off.
3) I work near what I've got, or find some financing (mortgage refi) to bring back a new advocate.
4) If the lawsuit involves my home, then I probably won't be capable of sell it. I might consider abandon it and becoming a transient that lives on the southern california beaches.
5) I'd ask my boss for a put on a pedestal.
6) I tell them to bring it.
7) And we're put money on to therapy. Or divorce, but that's more expensive and involves more lawyer, which sounds like it won't relief anything.
What should be done to improve the nouns of lawyers?
Is in attendance a solution?Answers: Most lawyers I know are ethical. Lawyers hold to take on deeply of responsibility that is much more than the lay soul can even fathom. The solution for unethical ones is sanction, fines, disbarment, and possibly criminal charges.
Before anybody can be a lawyer they enjoy to fill out a detailed 30+ page moral qualities form and get criminal conditions checks etc. as well as graduate from a fully ABA official law arts school, pass a 2 to 3 time Bar exam, and swear an oath to uphold and respect the law.
What they hold in place already is fine near me.
What would you propose in add-on to all that?
A short hunting season..2-3 weeks max(maybe extended for bow and black powder) near a limited number of tag available. Just enough to cull the hear,eliminating the slow and unprincipled, and to bring some much needed sportsman revenue. What do you think?
What should i do?
There is a video store down the road from my apartment. I wanted to attain an account at hand so i could rent movies. They told me that they could not allow me to open an explanation with them because i can not show them a valid driver's liscence. I explained to them that i am inept to drive due to me having a tremor disability. But they still refused service to me. Isn't this violate the person beside disability act? This really have bothered me knowing i can't rent movies cause i dont drive. Please don't report to me to go to a different movie store or to return with a state I.D cause i hold a state I.D. but they won't take it.Answers: Do you hold a passport ? Maybe they will accept that as it have a photo for ID also.
If you have no luck ring another branch or store and explain your situation - see if they are more obliging.
It sounds like the Manager is one very difficult - I wouldn't be contained by a hurry to give them your business even if they did stretch out an account for you.
They a moment ago need to verify your identity, so the state ID is satisfactory. Ask to speak to the manager, and if that doesn't work, ask for the owner's first name.
Maybe the person working in that isn't familiar near State IDs. You are not being treated honourably!
have someone else next to a drivers liscence open an reason for you.
guess I'll never be able to open out a movie account any.
Restraining Order?
Here's the story: My fiance has a 3 yr antiquated daughter. She lives with us. The baby's mother whom I've never met, nor talk to, spends time with the daughter whenever it's convinent for her. She's not around highly much. I have blocked her email, her myspace page, changed my phone number, etc. She is constantly sending deed messages to my fiance that "she's going to take vigilance of me," or "her friends are going to take carefulness of me," or "she's going to come to our house and have a reach a deal with me." The record of stuff she has said is unrelenting. Now, I've never met her nor talked to her, beside that being said, would I be capable of get a Restraining Order against her because of her threats to me? I hold done nothing to this girl. She realize that she had the great vivacity with my fiance and presently she wants him support. They broke up 2 yrs before we started dating. Does she truly have to follow through on her threats to draw from an order, or can I acquire one just on written text and verbal threats from her?Answers: you inevitability to talk next to your local police, but i believe that the threat is enough to carry a restraining order---just make sure you hang on to copies of her txt messages so you have proof
I would first look at why you are dating/living next to this loser and putting up with his nutto ex
A restraining command will not stop her from putting a cap surrounded by you, so get out of the relationship ASAP
She have a right to see her daughter. She doesn't have a right to harrass you. She can say-so whatever she requests to your fiance. So far, it's not threatening. It can be taken in two ways. It's not black and white, nonetheless.
If your fiance is genuinely concerned for your well-being, than he is the one that requirements to start talking to the sherrifs department and local police to see what option are available to you.
Wow, GeriLynn, are you paranoid, or what?
Exactly what does it mean to 'take attention of' someone?
For well more than two decades, I took thinking of people on an every-day-at-work-ly argument. That's what I did for my customers, clients, and co-workers: I took care of them. Never passionately, either.
Taking thinking of you does NOT mean she's going to do something unruly to you. Only if she SAYS she's going to do something violent to you will it even BEGIN to indicate that, and the only non-ambiguous entity you say she's said is that she's going to own a talk next to you.
What exactly in the world are you afraid of?
TALKING?
Although nearby is nobody here on this forum qualified to tell you that you cannot get hold of a restraining order for exactly what you so desire, I, for one, be I the judge, would enjoy to laugh it out of court.
I would most no problem agree with you on the member that she should not have to follow up on her threats until that time you were granted the nouns that you sought, but, I would not even begin to percieve comments resembling these as anything even akin to threats of a violent personality.
One particular course in which the residence 'take care of' and 'have a confer with' you would be very notably appropriate, is in discussing next to you her concerns about her daughter's welfare.
It could impressively easily be that since you've never if truth be told spoken to her, you're only getting one side of the conversation, and that your fiance is trying to carry her to come talk to you in the region of their daughter about something that your fiance feel should be a woman-to-woman kind of entity, and that she's just dictum that she'll take trouble of you as in rob care of setting up a time to sermon to you.
That's how people contained by businesses refer to taking care of setting up meeting to discuss important things near each other adjectives the time.
So, until she actually DOES threaten you, I would voice to stop sweating it, and, even more, I would have to utter that it might be a very honourable thing for you to initiate the process of reunion up with her.
I'd be terribly willing to bet that she's every bit as afraid of jamboree you as you are of meeting her.
As an attorney you are defending a serial killer, what would you do?
You are defending a serial executioner and he tells you nearby are extra bodies that the police don’t know about it.What whould you do?
Answers: Use the information to plea to a vivacity sentence in establish to avoid the death cost.
Some of the answers to your question so far, assuming the answerers are lawyer, are discouraging. The canons of professional responsibility require a legal representative to represent his client zealously, within the imperative. His professional duty is to protect his client's legal rights and present his client's covering in the most favorable reading light possible within the rules of canon. That's required in proclaim for our adversary system of equality to work properly. If he thinks he have some more important overriding duty, he's mistaken. If he have no stomach for the task, he should bear up some other profession.
If I am lying about ebay and paypal mortal THIEVES Why have they not sued me ???
Surely they can afford an attorney,I be determined...they stole over a grand in recent times from me !!! Add that to the other half million relatives they ripped off JUST THIS YEAR.I regard they can afford to hire one to sue me...COME ON EBAY.SUE ME !!!Answers: I'll second to that about Ebay man thieves!!
To sue you for slander, they'd have to prove that you've lied and that they've suffered some sabotage to their reputation as a result of your lies.
There's also the practical side of the equation: unless you've got thousands more for them to sue you for, consequently there's no point in bringing an expensive lawsuit to grasp nothing within return. Sure, they could sue you for equitable relief to gain a court order for you to stop spreading lies, but it'd be basically for the principle, and there's no profit in principle.
What are they going to sue you for? Libel? Slander? That depends whether you wrote, or said, cynical things about them.
Libel or slander lawsuits are difficult and expensive prospects, because of what the petitioner (the allegedly harmed party) have to prove:
1. You wrote or said things that are false.
2. You knew them to be false.
3. You said or wrote them anyway, beside the deliberate intention of cause harm to the petitioners.
4. The petitioners be harmed by what you wrote or said.
In other words, just because your are not getting sued does not aim that you are right.
I could buy a car, and right now face expensive repairs. I could utter or write terrible things in the region of General Motors, or Honda, or whatever the saloon company was. I doubt massively much if they would sue me. Their lawyers would recommend them that I was giving an evaluation only, and that their profits be not harmed.
Sorry. I know you feel wronged, and it hurts to carry ignored when you enjoy a complaint, but they simply have no interest within suing you because there is zilch for either PayPal or EBay to gain from doing so.
They are not suing you because you are not have any impact on their business. Besides, the general public seem to be backing them.
I am sorry if you hold had a doomed to failure experience with them, but I can honestly enunciate I have used ebay and paypal several times and have never have an issue. If they are "thieves" as you say, they are not target everyone.
Is there a directive that says an member of staff must get an x number of minutes breaktime?
Law that protects the body regarding number of hrs/minutes break timeAnswers: an eight hour shift you obtain a 10, 30, and a final 10. this is usually broke up every two hours, starting two hours after you clock in. it is a labor imperative. as for less after eight hours, i have no notion. you will have to walk to the labor law website. i'm within southern california.
There's no federal law that requires employer to give non-exempt force (hourly wage employees) any breaks. This means respectively state sets its own, and certain types of job will have mandatory breaks surrounded by them.
The links below detail the federal law and one state's decree (Califlornia's) on the matter.
More Questions and Answers:
[1448] - [1617] - [2532] - [2288] - [2046] - [740] - [887] - [212] - [1808] - [2326] - [1751] - [1228] - [389] - [1359] - [1128] - [2277] - [570] - [238] - [2169] - [127]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: