Law Questions and Answers
Do you think its moraly right for the goverment to allow the Dutch auction of tobbacco products knowing they kill?
Answers: It could be argued that it is morally wrong to block the sale of diamorphine, cocaine, LSD, ketamine, cannabis, etc, when the public sale and/or use of Volatile Substances (glue, aerosols, etc) and Khat, fly agraics, alcohol, chocolate, knife, etc are not as restricted, yet they adjectives kill.
Governments build very contridictory law on a regular basis. Some founded on science, some founded on moral frenzy and media frenzy, some founded on the interests of business and some founded on the doctrine of Christianity!
is it morally right for relations to drive even though car accident kill citizens.
is it morally right for people to own guns
is it morally right for family to eat fatty foods since it is bleak for them and might cause their demise.
If people want to die it have nothing to do next to the morality of government
The rule should concern themselves with running the country, a bit than telling general public what they should think and what they can do surrounded by their private lives.
They can advise empire as to the possible dangers of tobacco, but ultimately it is up to respectively person as to whether they cart that advice or not.
If we adjectives stopped smoking the government would inevitability to look into other areas that they can get taxes from.
So, non-smokers, it is surrounded by your interest to let us transport on with our 'evil weed' otherwise you'll own some tax slapped on you!
No. In reality the government should be prosecuted for living sour immoral yield as, instead of banning a agreed poison they just toll the rear call a halt off it!!
You can't legislate morality.
I conjecture that the government is to involved within everyday life. Alot of things butcher that are for sale..including alcohol, perscription drugs, guns, ammunition, automobiles, motorcycles, knife, pesticides, poisions, plastic, animals...the list is continuous. My question to you is "Where do you draw the strip?" Should they outlaw perfume because it makes someone sick? How give or take a few condoms because they are birth control? How about everything made of plastic because it cause cancer? How about every motorized vehicle because it cause air polution? How in the region of cell phones, ipods, and blackberry's they cause distraction and swish polution? OH and lets not forget rope..someone might commit suicide (thats bent too)
no, but if they didnt there would be a lb6bn shortfall contained by the treasury every year. Besides there are so tons things that can kill on the souk if they were adjectives banned life span would be stagnated
Smokers would have to stand on street corners looking for a provider, but they might be cheaper.
Pst: it's not what goes contained by the mouth that defiles, but what comes out the mouth: Matthew 15:11: James 3:6. If you verbs believing lies(laws), the law will without doubt condemn and kill you: Job 15:6... 1Corinthians 15:56...James 1:15.
By the using of law all perish: Colossians 2: 20-22.
Grace --> Mercy ---> Peace near you all. Amen.
If the policy was to ruling out everything that was doomed to failure for us we would be living in cave and eating vegatables. TAX money power and income is the driving force down any government and beside the tax on cigarettes so high-ranking they will never ban them a moment ago keep putting up the price.
I am a non smoker but still have a feeling that smokers drinkers and car drivers gain a raw agreement on tax within every respect I guess that includes almost everyone.
Everyone talks just about reducing their carbin footprint but the tax footprint we hand down behind is at least possible a size 13 and no one seem to care.
Sorry the vegatable are nearly done and I involve to clean out the hole in the ground have a great year and Happy Christmas to all.
Do you consider it's morally right for the government to allow the Dutch auction of bombs, guns and ammunition meant for bloodbath?
Alcohol kills more family than tobacco and they'll never stop allowing that to be sold.
Yes, it's up to the individual to make the choice. Haven't you have enough of individual told what you can and cannot do, what happened to responsibility?? Let's frontage it if they were to exclusion the sale of things that wipe out where would it stop? Cars, alcohol, fatty foods, sugary foods, over the counter medicine etc., etc., they all exterminate in by some means, or have the potential to.
I am sooooooo sick of this nanny state!!!!!
Just similar to Domestic Gas, Electricity, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Ships, Buildings, Zebra Crossings, Guns, Knives, Baseball Bats, Beer Bottles, Drunk Drivers, The Police, Stairs, Bath Tubs, Fire, Kitchen Equipment, Lawn Mowers, DIY Equipment.
In effect, anything the Government allow for sale
If you decline down the stairs...you could die.
A gun can kill you, a pierce, a box cutter, hell slice open a finger beside a good newspaper cut and if it gets infected that could eliminate you..
Food can kill you. Trees can exterminate you. Ice can kill you.
How tons things should the government outlaw because they might destroy you?
it is the weakness of the administration.Modern govt allows such unethical business as they do plentiful unethical work trailing the screen which public could not know.
Can legal exploit be taken against individual trying to harm by black tricks?
Answers: I fully agree with Syed. Just to join for your information, few months back when one of the top Senior proponent was arguing back the bench of the Supreme Court of India, he pointed out something regarding astrological prediction on which the Judges contained by the bench told him that they (the court) don't believe in astrological predictions, so if the court doesn't believe within such astrological prediction how can you think of making them believe within magic or black trickery by bringing any legal motion against the person adjectives in adjectives such illogical & unscientific things???
In common No. It would depend on the country where it is practised. Unfortunately Blackmagic is not even so clearly defined. Legal action can be initiated against any creature or institution if he or it violates indubitable provisions of legislations ( civil or criminal) enacted by the State. In the non-attendance of codified law, the civil wrong, call a tort, is covered under the tortious regulation or the customs and practices prevailing in a nation/society. Black illusion in the adjectives sense it is used worldwide is neither a civil wrong or a criminal action. BUT, if the voodoo etc., affects your duration, liberty, property, or contained by any manner cause a damage, afterwards the perpetrator can be proceeded against.
Further, law and logic, do not budge together. In most civilised nations, a soul cannot be convicted for an offence unless it is proven beyond adjectives reasonable doubt that he is the culprit. How could any one pin the liability on such entity, in a court of imperative.? Proof, is essential for any legal exploit and in its unreality, the black magician will freshly walk out cheerily from the court. But the big question is what is this black point.? Books are plenty on this topic. Movies abound with believable tale. But nobody has still dare challenge this practice. Like astrology, the perpetrator thrives on your mistrust of the unknown.
Though many, ( USA, and India, have) countries hold a blanket law prohibiting such undercover practises and cults, in most of the cases the guys escape beside a warning or a fine or simple incarceration.
One can crystallize the legal liabiity within this fashion;-
1. Harm cause by black magic is to be established beyond doubt. Otherwise allowed action will go amiss.
2.In the absence of its clear import and demonstration of this evil practice, and in the unreality of codified law, outlawing such practices, legal performance, per se, against this magic will come to nothing.
3. Further if you are tormented but cannot exhibit any visible sign of the damage, sustaining a conviction is impractical.
Regretably, legitimate action can be initiated, but sustaining a conviction and incarcerating him or her for voodoo etc., within the absence of proof that the damage was cause by black magic, is still a far cry.
Krish.
can u prove it. iof u can prove and provide concrete evidence, next may be yes.
Is freedom only a state of mind?
why can't relatives go where on earth ever they want to?live where ever they similar to?
is it some sort of discrimination?
Answers: No one is truly free. and never will be while they are still breathing.
folks can go where on earth they want but like everything at hand are rules and ways for doing it.
freedom cannot over be achieved because in attendance are always some rules
gravity, if we want to live me requirement to eat etc...
Freedom is state of mind as all right as an ideal. Modern society does not allow freedom within the truest sense as that would be anarchy, if you were competent to do as you liked when you like along with the rest of mankind society would crumble to dust. Instead we hold a variation on the matter, a form of freedom that allows people to live within harmony (or at smallest try to). Unfortunately to achieve even that in attendance has to be rules (contradictory but true) otherwise you restrict the freedom of others through your engagements. Society is a product of this variation on freedom and as such populace wish to protect it this is where on earth the boundaries you mention come from.
True Freedom would never work in the modern world, ethnic group are neither ready for it nor organized to make the sympathetic of sacrifices needed for it to be workable.
Freedom can become a state of mind, because where on earth ever you go (or are), at hand are rules about what you can and cannot do. So vitally, there is no freedom ANYWHERE surrounded by our nation.
"Stone walls do not a prison make
Nor iron bar a cage..."
Freedom is a state of mind, yes.
Freedom is just a state of mind.
People can't go only just anywhere because there are privacy and property law.
If you can get sanction from whatever country you will to live, you are free to relocate.
There is some sort of discrimination contained by everything in duration...just progress with the flow and you'll be o-kay...remember, no on get out alive...not even Jesus.
No, it's not just a state of mind; it's definable and tangible. It just doesn't exist within today's world, largely because of people who politicize the word for their own ends and legislate the realness out of existence.
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed goings-on according to our will within precincts drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the precincts of the law' because law is regularly but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violate the rights of the individual."
~Thomas Jefferson
yes it does.. you define it you implement it , you live it and breath it.. it is individual ,,
free society is a group of population who come together to form a so city with rules and law. it is a concerted effort. this by definition vehicle that not all will enjoy the freedom they desire. this means you hold a limited freedom by your collective choice.
freedom as most below stand it is the second point i made. free dom can and for the most part is
freedom of speech
freedom of choice
freedom of movement
freedom from concern of government
freedom to observe the laws and morals set by the collective.
every article else is a personal choice, your choice to live in society or to disregard it
why people cant freshly live anywhere comes down to a collective choice and controls by the collective for the supposed good of adjectives. the recognition of park ownership and the ability of those to properly care for the topography and its resources. most people come to nothing badly within the last point.
thus this lead to a collective decision by the free society to govern the integral
hope this help you a bit
Freedom is more than a state of mind. It involves have control over your own destiny.
Freedoms sometimes come into conflict. Someone's freedom to live where he like may well come into conflict near yours if he decides he requirements to live in your house.
its becoming that route !!!
voltaire said, "i may disagree with what you enjoy to say, but i will preserve your right to say it "
ill-fatedly, the govt ratches up the fear even, then take our liberties away !
What would be the reason that this physician´s bureau would be searched by the FBI?
Federal official spent much of Tuesday taking documents from Bloomington offices belonging to Dr. Kamal Tiwari, a local anesthesiologist.So far, no information have been released as to the source for the investigation.
Around 8:30 a.m., Federal Bureau of Investigation agents swarmed Tiwari’s medical practice at 2920 McIntyre Drive. Uniformed Bloomington police officers be eventually posted outside the office, where on earth they prevented anyone from entering. An FBI agent was also posted at a reverse entrance to the medical office.
By Tuesday afternoon, a handwritten sign on the door said the organization was closed and directed anyone who needed give a hand to “go to the hospital.”
Bloomington police cars were also see outside Tiwari’s Pain Management Center business office at 2400 Cota Drive. Throughout the morning and afternoon, a Budget moving van be loaded with several boxes taken from the building, while a uniformed Bloomington police officer stood just round the corner.
Answers: Breezer...
There are any number of reasons why this Dr. may be the target of an FBI investigation, because the agency is empower by law to investigate alleged violation of ANY federal criminal statute.
It's possible, in insertion to writing bogus prescriptions for federally controlled substances (mentioned above), that he had be submitting fraudulent billings for reimbursement under Medicaid or Medicare.
Finally, it is entirely possible that the FBI investigation involves alleged actions that have zilch whatsoever to do with his practice. It's possible the FBI have reason to believe that evidence of the bent activity may be found surrounded by his office.
Bottom flash: There is no telling what this doc allegedly did that brought the FBI to his bureau, based simply on the information contained by the story. Eventually, the charges will become public (if they are filed) and will no doubt be reported by duplicate paper. That's the individual way you'll know for sure.
Usually, it is a discrepency within prescription drugs, especially anesthesia type drugs.
Many Dr.s become addicted, or sell the drugs and if the paperwork doesn't contest the usage, they are screwed.
Prescription painkillers are BIG business now. It could enjoy something to do with immorally supplying a dealer or writing phony 'scrips. Although you would assume the DEA would be involved...
Seeked help of ex but included personal matter of girlfriend.?
My girlfriend of 10 months wants to donate me after I emailed something she sent me, it was not to be discussed beside my ex, but instead I was seeking insight.Am I contained by the wrong?
Answers: Ummm, no one can say-so if it is right or wrong, that is personal belief. I can say however that after one and only 10 months, I would be very upset if you shared anything almost me with your ex unless it be to tell her how damn sexy I am, or relay her what a catch I am etc etc...
yes
What documents are needed to obtain a matrimonial license in california?
Answers: Siskiyou County Marriage License Office
County Clerk
311 4th Street
Room 201
Yreka, CA 96097
530-842-8084
$43
Getting a nuptials license in California is a relatively comfortable process. Although I believe the following information to be up-to-date, it is always a well-mannered idea to double-check the requirements beside your town's Municipal Office prior to applying - especially if you have any unusual or questionable circumstances.
Age Requirements
Basically, both the bride and groom must be 18 years of age or elder to apply for a license without parental consent. If any the bride or groom is under the age of 18, a parent or permissible guardian must appear with the couple. In increment, the couple will need certified copies of their birth certificate and the couple must also schedule an appointment near a counselor and appear before a peacemaker. Please check with your county clerk for more detailed information.
Fees
The license allowance is approximately $80 but it varies for respectively county and some offices individual accept brass. It is a good perception to call ahead and ask how much the license will cost. You can use the county dig out form below to obtain the phone number of your local couny recorder's bureau.
Appear in Person With Proof of Identity, Age, and Residency
For adjectives offices, you both must appear surrounded by person to apply for the license. You will be required to prove your age by presenting one of the following:
valid driver's license
valid passport
valid birth permit
valid state identification card
You should also be prepared next to the following information:
your parents' names
your mothers' maiden name
your parents' birthplaces
Blood Tests
Blood tests are not required.
When One Party is Widowed or Divorced
In the suitcase of a previous marriage that concluded either within divorce or death, be prepared near the divorce papers (or annulment documents) signed by a judge or passing certificate - no issue how long ago the death or divorce occur. Rules regarding divorce ebb and flow by county so you may want to call and check up to that time applying.
Waiting Period
There is no waiting period.
Residency Requirements
You do not own to be a resident of California.
License Validity
The license is valid for 90 days and it can only be used within the State of California.
well if you want to marry me i will answer you if then i won't.
What does socio-economic background be going to?
I hear this term profusely but do not understand it. What does it plan?Answers: it is your economic circumstance, ie...did you come from poor roots, middle class, or upper class. only within addition to how much money your grandparents and parents may or may not hold had, it take into account social (society) reason as to why your economic surroundings is such...so for example, not to imply they are any worse past its sell-by date as a family, but a poor inherited coming from the inner city has slightly different reason as to why they are poor compared to a poor family surrounded by the mountains in Virginia. Both are considered poor...facade a lot of impossible to tell apart problems, but technically when the reasons are broken down, it can be see they are 'poor' for different reasons. Same can be said at the other cessation of the spectrum...growing up were you middle or upper class within a nice neighborhood going to good school? Was it your family that have money, or were you raise modest with apt work ethic and the drive to make your own millions...elderly money versus new money. These things impact and are impacted by your social surroundings.
social and monetary groups
like
white / rich
white / poor
black conservative / rich
Chinese / middle class
Social status - Your standing contained by the community. Cop,crook, jobless, chef, student, drug dealer, white collar, blue collar ...
Economic status - Wealth or drought of; Upper class, middle class, rich, poor...
Background - Where someone comes from
Socioeconomic relates to where / what social and physical environment an individual lives and works.
For example: a white-collar worker might live contained by the suburbs and work in a business district. Socio-economic group might be an affluent middle to upper class 'status' - closely associated near income and education. Further, a blue-collar worker might be view as a middle to lower class 'status' - - - get the conception?
It is a classification of where an individual might live and work and how much 'spending' power he/she might enjoy.
This includes things like femininity, race, income, and where on earth you live.
Why are Psychedelic Mushrooms illegal?
Answers: Mostly because we hold a bunch of busy body lawmakers who deduce interfering in other people's lives is their top priority.
Most medical doctors agree that drug ill-treat is a medical problem, not a criminal problem. But we are too stupid to treat it as a medical problem. Instead, we spend BILLIONS each year on interdiction and incarceration. What we hold accomplished is the erosion of our civil liberty, violation of posse comitatus, and increased hostility. Our drug laws are selectively enforced, reducing overall respect for the canon. We allow private property to be seized for bogus reasons.
In a renowned case contained by Texas, one police officer could not be bothered to plant real drugs on his victims. Instead, they be convicted of possession of cocaine and sentenced to prison for sheet rock. It was singular after the family of one of these men manage to get together adequate money to hire a decent attorney to run test on the so called "drugs" that the nouns was discovered and most of the men be eventually released.
Sheet rock. What drug abusers need is treatment and rehabilitation, not prisons sentences that cost us adjectives and more thoroughly destroy their family.
because they're hallucinogens and...let's say.. they receive people muse they can fly, so they jump rotten balconies and break their legs.
true story.
IN SHORT: Psychedelics can break the spell of the Powers That Be and expose their duplicities and atrocities.
" ...if their public sale were legalized, the popularity of these psychedelic drugs would be restricted, their widespread use—which, I devise, is feared—could indeed prove a threat to the continued expansion of modern industry. If new opportunity were extended to individuals for strange and exhilarating explorations into the mysterious universe and the mysterious self, the market for media entertainment, for bag tourism and for all the modern bits and pieces of commercial hedonism would surely diminish.
Finally, in our technocratic civilisation, contained by which adjustment to the machine entail becoming like the contraption, the hallucinogenic experience is one way of releasing, for a while, the faltering human spirit trapped inside the appliance."
http://www.psychedelic-library.org/misha...
a hippies answer- because they make you devise mannn
a doctors answer- because its essentially food poisoning and can be very injurious if the bacteria get to any part of your body besides your ingestion system (ie if you breathe contained by the bacteria you can find bacteria within your lungs)
my answer-- the government is simply a big corporation. there a short time ago like adjectives other people, they want to be rich, and not enjoy to do anything. the easiest way for this is to allege a stable and predictable economy. if society take mind altering substances, they appear to make un-orthadox choices and work in an un-orthodox path. this makes the command scared because immediately you are not just a statistic anymore, you are an individual that make choices on your own, not just a computer program that follows the pre-determined pathway the governing body has made for you. they be paid all your choices for you.
although the Psylosybin mushroom is not brutal when eaten properly (ie* zilch goes wrong near inhaling the bacteria rotten it), there is a extremely similar looking psychoactive mushroom that is VERY cruel if eaten, and habitually people guzzle these on mistake and die.
my advice to you is if your planning on doing shrooms for the first time... put together sure someone else has already tested out the shipment of shrooms before you (a time or 2 before to see full effects) and dont do more afterwards you can handle (ie no more after an 8th... thats plenty for ur first time) maybe even a partly 8th. and no matter how upright of a time you have remember... EVERYTHING IN MODERATION! dont seize lost in glory. dont abuse any substance. use them as tools.
oh yeah, and if you do gain caught by cops with them on you, its considered manslaughter because they amount your selling poison to other people.
Because they are psychedelic
Fight at work UK?
I am a team leading light? I was informed a guy have left rash the evening before. I be in the canteen making a drink the guy be in nearby. Reading someones paper he have taken from there pouch. I asked him about the evening until that time and told him who had informed me.I be not intending to take it further but needed the guy to know that it be not acceptable.
He become aggressive I said lets shift outside we can sort this out. I ment see the person and confirm not spar. Its Christmas good will to adjectives men.
Anyway he through a punch the first landed but have an exboxer I mange to block the rest and restrain him. I let him stir he seemed to hold calmed down.However he had lost the top upper teeth contained by the afray. I backed, past its sell-by date he came at me again hitting me surrounded by the mouth this time there be a witness.who heard the commotion have come into the cateen. I was restraining him again. He calmed down and I passed him a towel and.I finished making the coffee I reflect he caught with an elbow. We av be suspened
Answers: If this goes to some form of disciplinary audible range then you will entail to get ALL your facts right. Trying to remember them when asked roughly speaking it in xxx days, or weeks, is never a appropriate idea. Write out a complete report, man as honest as you can, which you can use at any subsequent meeting is paramount.
If your colleague is doing like peas in a pod then you will own some corresponding facts that will tally and hopefully people will see this as a storm surrounded by a teacup and that the whole incident be isolated and behind you.
Good luck.
"Let's dance outside" does a problem. You should get entity into formal, i.e. asked him to go to your organization together.
In fact, when someone told you whosoever give notice early, you should ask him to your organization in the precipitate morning in the subsequent day. You should ask him whether it be true and understand his difficulties, i.e. be a apposite coach. Then, you should consult your supervisor about this shield and raise the flag of the possibility within firing him.
Now those are too late. You should attain a lawyer and travel with that attorney to report this fighting to police. It is a grip of assort and can be criminal. If the court sentenced that you are a victim and underneath a self-defence situation, then you may hold your job posterior.
In fact, you should bring some training on leadership or violent intelligence etc. Try to read the series of Collin's Best Practise
you asked to go outside i parsimonious one thing lead to another you both are at blame..sorry but true
Do you think some of the sex perpetrator laws are too caustic?
for instance, say you are a senior contained by high conservatory, 18 yrs old, and you start dating a sophmore 16 years older. You can be charged with statutory rape even if she consented to mortal with you. If this be to happen, the guy would be required to register as a sex criminal for the rest of his life. It would stigmatize his likelihood of getting into college, where he could live, his job, and the options for advance his life. All b/c he happen to love someone that was 2 yrs younger than him.Answers: contained by a case resembling that, i would say its for a time too harsh...but contained by cases were grown men rape babyish children, i think they should hold to spend 25 years in incarcerate with a lonely 350 pound man.
Its one and only illegal if you gain caught.
Technically thousands of cases of 'statuatory rape' occur every prom season between without a flaw willing partner.
Charges and registration onto that database only materialize if one of the parties (obviously, the womanly in most cases) is charged beside the "crime".
However, for the thousands of others, nothing will ever come of it, tablet transmission of STI and unwanted pregnancies.
In some US states, here are already amendments to existing laws allowing sexual contact within this particular situation - but those official waters are far from settled, with continuing question about the threshold of consent and definition of sexual act.
The problem is the idea of "nothing tolerance" laws, that founder to take into details the situation. As in the above scenario, for example. Or a man and woman parkign their vehicle for a quick fumble. Or contained by the case of a man man caught taking a piss behind a dumpster on his instrument home from a bar. That's public indecency technically, and that equals registration as a sex criminal. Which screws his life span up, as everyone around him will know he was a sex wrongdoer, but not what his "crime" was.
It ruins profusely of people's lives.
And for what? For the chance for politicians to appear to be doing something SOLID against paedophiles and rapists, even though it won't really affect them much at adjectives.
It criminalises people doing non-hazardous things, and brands them for life alongside some of the worst criminals within society. That's not good.
~A 16 year antediluvian, as a matter of decree, cannot consent. If you decide to do her, no situation how willing she may be, it is a criminal feat. The age differential and the respective age of the participants determines the height of the crime - from misdemeanor sexual misconduct all the opening up to rape. If you choose to ignore that simple reality of life, be prepared to foot the price. Knowing the consequences, why would you consider the risk of diddling a child who could turn on you next week and put you astern bars. Even if she doesn't blow you contained by, have you considered what her parents might know how to do if they find out? Your felony record will inflict you far more grief later contained by life than will the SO registration.
You departed out the best part. After you do your time (and significant prison jargon are mandatory in various states), you could be subject to civil commitment for life within several states. The number of states with such Draconian law is growing; soon all 50 will enjoy jumped on that fussy SO bandwagon, especially if the neocons and 'Christian' bigots maintain their stranglehold on the hall of power.
You don't have to agree near the law. You of late have to observe it or to pay the price if you establish it doesn't or shouldn't apply to you because you want to get it on near a minor.
Keep it in your pant or do it with an fully fledged.
NO, I think Sex Offender law should be even tougher if anything.
We need to conveyance in the route they are classified. For instance, as in the bag where it is two teenagers have consensual sex and those who get intoxicated and urinate surrounded by public can be charged with indecent exposure and would be classified a sex wrongdoer if convicted. These people next to nothing more than poor ruling should not be classified as a sex offender.
Actually the answers you enjoy recieved are pretty much wrong. In MOST states the age of consent for sex is actually 16, some are 17 and individual a handful are 18. So the situation you are describing is actually tremendously unlikely, and would only begin if you lived in confident areas. That said virtually all states also own "close in age exceptions" contained by their age of consent laws, which finances if young nation are only a few years apart and if they enjoy sex they will not be prosecuted. Example: Connecticuit's age of consent is 16 but a 2 year leeway exists. So a 15 and 17 year matured is legal but a 15 and 20 year antiquated is not.
More Questions and Answers:
[288] - [1074] - [727] - [2206] - [563] - [1699] - [537] - [2355] - [999] - [334] - [717] - [1843] - [1326] - [1545] - [166] - [2363] - [865] - [554] - [1447] - [1950]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: