Law Questions and Answers

What are the odds of a terrorsit attack on...?

any where on earth in the US not name New York, Wahington, Los Angeles or Chicago?
Answers: I would say pretty suitable. one of the worst scenarios is a multiple location attack, focused on crowded places: Malls, sports arenas, big college campus. a combination of bombs, fire bombs, and guns, or worse, chemical/biological attacks, would be devastatingly destructive
You mean surrounded by a place named something along the lines of Oklahoma City?

Terrorism can transpire anywhere, all you have need of is one pissed off maniac.
Superbowl, NBA All star team game, Las Vegas, Orlando, Miami, tons of ports all over.

I'd influence all of those are practical scenarios, but the most predictable ones are the ones you list surrounded by the question.

Shame that we endow with more per capita in terrorism compliance to north dakota than NYC!
I would think that if they be smart, they would hit us in a smaller town, and not a metropolitan nouns. Look at the word "terrorist". Their main purpose is to instill the creeps and terror. What better channel than to hit you where you don't expect it.

But, as we adjectives know, these guys are not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree, and are cowards too boot. The real terrorist at the rear the attacks can't even show their face. They bring some vulnerable kids and childlike adults to do their dirty work for them.
In my opinion I 'd voice the odds increase exponentially near every passing time that we don't have one.We will be hit again. That is the inopportune truth of the matter at mitt. Brave men and women work tirelessly to prevent this from happening but, even they know the inevitable truth. The cities that you down are all possible target given there size and density. However, I muse it would be most wise for us to beef up the financial guarantee of the more vulnerable soft and effortless targets of middle America and the suburbs. Stay vigilant

What could have cause my drug test to be positive?

I one-time a drug test (gas crotography) ultimate friday. I have unacquainted any drugs in the ultimate 15 months. Completely sober no alcohol or anything. My probation officer told me today my test come back positive for Methamphetamine...he said it be trace amounts and showed me the results and the paper said the height was 308 what could create this? The only drug i own taken in times gone by two months was ex lax the darkness before the experiment
Answers: there are several herb that can cause an inconclusive recoil to drug test that would be golden trademark, ephedra, bitter orange, Poppy seed just to nickname a few they do not make every ones theory test positive but it depends on your makeup. there are also tons of prescription drugs that can do it too, close to Adderal and Ritalin ( they are amphetamines) in combination near something like an antibiotic or possibly even ex-lax or a cold medicine similar to sudafed they could show up different. Ask for another test!
Ex lax the dark before?
Why?
Are you sure you are not using purely a little?
pilfer it again if possible

one of my friend's audition results was switched at the lab next to another person.
Taking Sudafed or any cold/sinus tablets with Pseudoephedrine could impose a positive result.

Ask if you can be retested.

Canada and China have just this minute entered into a tentative co-operative venture that aims to enhance the sanctuary of impo

Canada and China have only just entered into a topical co-operative venture that aims to enhance the safekeeping of imported consumer stuff. What is the name of the different agreement?
Answers: Canada-China Joint Committee on Health - works
canada china joint committee on vigour

Child support?

my X thinks paying for my childs sports happenings subtracts from their child support is this TRUE.
Answers: Child Support is a set amount ordered based on a non- custodial parent's income. The custodial parent should use that money towards food, shelter, clothing and other expenses for the child.

If the non custodial parent chooses to spend auxiliary money for any reason on his/her child- which they should- it is not to be deduct from the child support being compensated.

Non- custodial parents must realize the child support does not always cover adjectives expenses and should be willing to aid with added expenses which include but are not controlled to extra curricular activities such as girl scouts, boy scouts, ROTC, ample science projects, summer camps, pen trips for school, sports/music equipment, music curriculum, dance classes, tutoring, summer college, college, etc.

Custodial parents should realize that a child's activities should be comparable to the income of both the parents and should not create a big burden on either parent- if the child desires to be contained by a lot of accomplishments perhaps the child requirements to help near some of those expenses through part-time and summer job.

Please know that all medical expenses for kids should be shared 50/50 by both parents and if you keep hold of your receipts for medicine and doctor's visit most disctrict attorneys will allow you to submit paperwork with no extra fees so that the parent not helping to pay envelope these expenses will be required to submit payments.
Child support is the money paid by a parent to serve provide for his or her children, who are not in that parent's custody. Under the Child Support Guidelines, the amount of child support is determined by a set formula, fairly than decided on a case-by-case cause by a judge.

Under the Guidelines, the amount of the clearing is based on the income of the parent who pays support and depends on the number of children self supported. Tables have be prepared listing the amount to be rewarded based on income rank and number of children. However, a court may order a support amount that is to say different from the tables lower than certain circumstances.

The federal Guidelines apply to foreign or revised child support orders made lower than the federal Divorce Act as of May 1, 1997. Ontario's amendments, which reflect the federal Guidelines, apply to untried or revised child support orders made underneath the provincial Family Law Act as of December 1, 1997.

The Guidelines, however, do not automatically affect existing child support information made before the above date. A parent with an existing child support establish must ask the court to change their demand to have the Guidelines apply. The Guidelines may also affect parents who enjoy negotiated out-of-court child support agreements, but simply if one or both of the parents bring the matter of child support beforehand the courts.

The federal government is conducting a review of the Child Support Guidelines.

Both the federal and Ontario government provide information to assist parents to understand the Guidelines.

The management of Ontario has prepared a series of question and answers about the Guidelines, entitled Federal Child Support Guidelines- What Ontario Families Need to Know.

The federal senate provides general information on the guidelines, including the following:
No it does not,but these expenses should be split 50-50.
You respectively should pay partially.
NO WAY, he should pay through the courts (The Department of Human Services) also he should oblige with the childs happenings financialy. Does the child not eat if he is playing orb. Your ex is crazy.
no. sports are a "luxury" check with you advocate anyway and get things within writing.
Not true. Although, they don't have to recompense for sports an such if they don't want to and if they decide not to that would move off you paying for them... which would ultimately subtract from the child support anyway... so, 6 to one half dozen to the other.
Your EX should foot child support, then if other finances arise, he/she AND YOU should dance in together. That is what my friends who are divorced do. (Mostly because one friend's EX think their kids should do VERY expensive hobbies and my friend just doesn't enjoy the money for that.) Now fi your EX cannot afford the extras" then the kids don't do it, or you foot. CHILD SUPPORT pays for SUPPORT..food, necessities, etc..not extracurriculars.
DEFINITELY FALSE!! Anything he pays over and above the child support is NOT deduct...Tell him he is just human being a good dad and to hang on to it up.
It depends on what your divorce spelled out. I would consult an attorney.
OMG.leave the guy alone.
don't do it save it legal so she cant come vertebrae to get you latter. you own to protect your self sucks but you cant say what might crop up if the future.
I believe Child support is a fixed percentage of what they form, so unless your ex agrees to something more (summer camp, sports etc) next I think that it does come bad unless you agree to something different. Attorneys are the only ones who product out in court disputes though.
Paying full support is for child not for sports activities.
He is required to endow with you $x.00 by the court. If he chooses to pay extra for the sports goings-on, etc that is up to him. He is lower than a court order to settle YOU. So he is wrong.
No it does not.
Look at the court order. If X is to retribution for things relating to the child then the answer would be yes. It will adjectives depend on the court order.
To put it simply, he is required to pay packet whatever the court ordered him too, no more no smaller amount.

If he chooses to pay for sports endeavours, or anything else for that matter, as an extra, to be precise his choice. Otherwise you get the money, and you choose what to do beside it, if you want to spend it on activities for your child that's your choice not his.

Anything extra he pays except just the child support amount comes out of his own pocket full stop.

Define one public policy or program that is currently used to prevent public charge crimes in your community.?

Research and demarcate one public policy or program that is currently used to prevent public proclaim crimes in your community. necessitate help
Answers: Video Surveillance Cameras. Do they count? They give the impression of being to be going up everywhere!

Should Drugs be legal?by drugs I have it in mind (Marijuana,Crack/Cocaine, Methamphetamine,LSD)..?

Do the lessons of Prohibition from 1920-1933 apply to this issue?
Answers: Marijuana isnt doomed to failure for you. Its only forbidden because Harry Anslinger
(head of treasury in 1930s) be having his multibillion industry threatened, so he appointed his nefew as person in charge of dangerous drugs and narcotics, underground meetings be held to try to find a way to product one of the worlds best resources out of the way. Eventually the made a movie call "reefer madness"(look it up on google video[not on youtube]). All it did was detail lies to trick the naive americans into teahing thier children not to, and so on. America have been suffering eversince. surrounded by the 1920s it was predicted that adjectives car fuil would be run an hemp, but those greedy bastards have to go and crease everything for america. if you realy care stir to norml.org (gives many facts of benifits of marijuana + pro-legalization of marijuana) if you enjoy any questions or would approaching to know some helpful info when chosing where on earth you stand you can email me (yahoo, if you scan these please dont delete my comment for this) nirvana270793@YAH00.com
if we ever want to make a natrual resource that be falsly accused of wrong doing we must create our voices hear (norml.org, ect.. email me if you want to know ways to stand for justice, [also sory if you dont meticulousness for politics but he can realy help, as he is the single presidential candiday that will talk nearly the taboo subject, due to fear of not getting elected Ron Paul, you can jump to ronpaul2008.com]
Its a plant not an evil drug (also can be used to replace 10-20% of potentialy addictive and costly medications)
why not ?

the people who do them don't vigilance what the law is anyway...
A crackhead will be a crackhead regardless of the consequences...

Besides it's your body... At some point individuals need to bring responsibility for themselves instead of relying on the government to protect us from ourselves.

Education is switch.

The biggest problem i've seen within my youth is when kids get elder and find out that all of the things they be told about drugs wasn't 100% accurate. The most esteemed information that could save lives isn't talk about because relatives see it as "ecouraging" drug use... for example... NEVER mix street drugs with prescriptions ...your knock on death's door by doing so, but they won't tell you that...they simpley give an account you not to ever do any of it. Schools usually talk going on for drugs in the generic sense and lump them adjectives in together as if they are adjectives the same..plainly anyone rational would describe you that there is a big difference between a couple beers and some mary j, within comparison to "shooting up". "Just say no" is a nice slogan, but it doesn't really narrate you a whole lot does it ?...an egg surrounded by a frying pan doesn't really convey the truth's something like the negative affects of drugs...but it's a nice optical if you're 5 I guess. So what happens when kids achieve 18 and start researching the negative robustness aspects of marijuana, and don't find any ?...they might begin to assume that not everything be as bad as they be told, because they weren't told the whole story. It's similar to telling kids not to own sex, without relating them why. "because I said so", works on children, but not on young adults.

People want to be responsible for themselves is what it all comes down to.regardless of the statute.
I like to reflect on of it as natural test anyway...


-----Added-----
I challenge anyone to present me a reason why Alcohol and Tobacco should be permissible, but Marijuana shouldn't be legal...?

Which of these kill more people ?
Which of these cause the most diseases ?
Which of these has the great addiction rate ?
Which of these causes the most crime to be committed ?
imho, we already hold enough impair drivers on the highways immediately.

on the other hand, if you'd legally recognized shootings when an impaired driver cause an accident, possibly there'd be fewer such accident in the long run.
I estimate so.

It would reduce crime because gang would not get money from selling drugs, because anyone could do it.

It wouldn't take home it moral only court.

I think you should be capable of do anything you want as long as you do not infringe on someone Else's right to life, lack of restrictions, or property.
Milton Friedman 1976 Economy Nobel Price, was against adjectives kinds of control and regulations, if Drugs are legally recognized then prices will budge down and many pushers will not hold enough motivation to initiate to drugs to our children, that flog their bodies when they are older ample to do it.
Police will not have the uncertainty to be corrupted also politicians. Our countries will not be spending a lot of money for making hughe barrier and points of control to impede drugs going into our schools and streets.
Of cours the lesson lerned on the 20's apply becouse alcohol is a officially recognized drug the same as tobacco.
Did You Know that partly million people die contained by USA becouse of deseases coused by tobacco?
50.000 people is inert each year becouse of accident coused by alcohol?
and only 3.000 empire die becouse other iligal drugs?
un saludo desde Bolivia
well some those say that they adjectives should be legal, and enjoy it up to the people whether they want to use them or not. the Prohibition time does somewhat apply here, singular then it be something that was legitimate and then made unauthorized, to many it is a big difference seeing as most of these enjoy not been official for over 100 or more years. those that distributed alcohol in the prohibition time (the Mafia) are still doing like today with these drugs, however the mafia is not so interested with what it is up to contained by modern days.

Where can I buy and smoke weed legally?

Answers: Berkeley and Santa Cruz, CA are pretty enlarge about this. I guess that in Berkeley they merely fine you for being caught next to a small amount in your possession. That said, don't drive after smoking it.
The Netherlands.

As a side file marijuana is not legal within Canada.
try Amsterdam


cheers!
why do u want to know??


stay in academy or make use of what you academic there

don't do drugs
I agree next to everybody else: Amsterdam. Also, if you are at least 30 percent Native American, as I believe that's the requirement, you are allowed to smoke marijuana on plantations in need risk of being pursued by the cops.

Hope this help!
Ask to Gabeira. That's his cup of tea.
Mais dois pontos na manha.
Thanks.
THE 60'S and the 70's are over . Get a haircut and attain a real living you stoner . If you must live in never never landscape ; go to Amsterdam . Coffee shops over here are basically pot shops . Good pot but it get old definite quick .

If you knew you could return with away with it..?

would you annihilate your worst enemy..how going on for a child molester or rapist or a mass murderer..

theres no chance of you getting caught
Answers: No, thou shalt not execute, if I recall...
No.

I don't believe within vigilantism.
hell yeah, i can picture it now:
a katana at the academy bullys (they target me) necks, blood gushing around...
No. I don't believe surrounded by lowering myself down to someone else's standards just because I can. Even though these general public are barbaric and savages, someone has to remain civilized.

What kind of doctors submit evidence to build criminal cases?

Answers: There are several different types of doctors who examine evidence. A coroner is a medical doctor. There may be psychologists, pathologists, several PhDs.

So generally any type of doctor can testify and examine evidence if approached by the prosecution of defense.
Potentially any primary physician. For instance, a minor child may be see by an internist, a pediatrician, a family doctor, an ER doctor. All of them are required by imperative to refer the case to the police if in attendance are signs of child abuse.

Ditto, gun shots are reportable, who ever treats them.
Medical Examiners. Other doctors probably would not be permitted to because of Patient confidentiality. They would also probably stipulation a court order by a Judge.

My sister's keepper issues and questions?

1. On page 122, Julia say, “Even if the law say that no one is responsible for anyone else, helping someone who wants it is the right thing to do.” Who embedded better how to “help” Kate, Sara or Anna? Explain

2. What is the metaphorical relevance of Brian’s profession as a fire chief?

3. On page 142, Brian says that when rescuing someone from a fire, that “safety of the rescuer is of a complex priority than the safety of the sufferer. Always.” How does this apply to his role in h is own relatives?

4. Do you feel that it’s ethical to conceive a child that meet specific genetic requirements?
If not, do you believe that there should be specific exceptions, such as the purpose of abiding another person’s life, or is this a short time ago a “slippery slope?”

anybody have any concept how to answer these questions its 1,3 that verbs me?
thanks
Answers: For anyone on Yahoo answers to back you, you need to identify the book you are chitchat about, and put this cross-examine in the category Homework Help, where on earth some people try to support students learn how to do their homework, not Law & Ethics, where on earth it is unethical for us to do your homework for you.

You involve to read the book, whatever book it is, and combine that near paying attention within class to the principles they trying to teach you, so that you can interpret the book according to those principles.

1. The law's work is not to make sense, but to punish citizens who have done impossible stuff. We all hold a responsibility to try to help our fellow human beings, to the best of our flair, and as influenced by our awareness of whatever the facts appear to be.

3. People enjoy a job to
* be capable of continue doing the profession
* rescue people

Let's suppose a rescue worker decide to put his or her own family ahead of the mass public. For example, we necessitate to evacuate a city, but let's get our family unit out first, and while we are doing that, we are delaying the start of our duty to the general public. That is corruption, treason.

4. The current state of art of conception is that God rolls the dice to determine how much of the child's genes come from each parent. There is also stuff resembling parental substance abuse ... if the father is a pouring smoker, it contaminates his sperm, to the detriment of the child.

As the fetus reaches diverse stages of development, the parents find out things approaching
* this child is boy or girl or twins
* this child has convinced defects

within some nations it is legalized for the parents to abort the child before some stage of nouns.

Different people enjoy different discomfort levels beside the rationale used by some parents to decide to abort a child, but right presently the law does not consideration what the reason is, solely if it is to be permitted or not

As medical science advances, and these law get revised, I instinctively believe

* if a woman is raped, she should have the right to abort the child of the rapist
* if near is a medical situation such that a woman and her child are both in imminant harms channel, the doctors should try to save one, but it the loss of one will help advance the odds of survival for the other, afterwards that is a natural life & death issue that the medical profession and family often hold to make, and I don't suppose other people should be second guessing them
* if it can be shown that an unborn child have a serious medical condition, then abortion may construct sense ... it is a judgement call ,,, how serious the condition relative to the current state of art and economics of medical protection

More Questions and Answers:
[822] - [2088] - [1162] - [1365] - [728] - [1716] - [2210] - [1516] - [157] - [311] - [842] - [84] - [807] - [231] - [2123] - [743] - [598] - [1866] - [2012] - [1221]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: