Law Questions and Answers

Is graffiti removal a form of tax-supported racism?

Answers: No.
Of course not.

Richard
No it actually is done to draw from eyesore scribbling that you liberals believe is one of the God given constitutional rights of scumbag lowlifes to deface other peoples property.

Maybe you should post a sign within front of where you live that give dirtbags the OK to deface the place where you live.

With your leftist liberal logic it must be racism to stop these same scumbags from doing drive by shootings.

Harrasment from ex-husband?

My ex husband has be harrasing me via phone for the past month, and I own saved adjectives messages from him. He lives in one state and I surrounded by another. Our son get's dissabilty which is in direct deposit contained by my name. The rationale being is that he have had guard accounts closed due to him being overdrawn.I enjoy a savings narrative for our son which a certain ammount go to that. I send money every month, contained by cash. I be foolish not to ask for a signed reciept for what I sent. My ex is now threatning to own me arrested for fraud. I do have hill records of adjectives withdrawls from my bank, and his reserves. I know that my ex has a drug problem, but I do not want to goto the step of reporting him, due to the reality that him and my son live with his parents and I dont want their house taken because of him.
I enjoy tried legal aid which can not abet me with this concern. Can someone please help me beside what to do. I plan on filing for full custody at the first of the year.
Answers: I really do not know the answer to this Amy but what I do know from going pay for and forth with my husbands ex is, documentation is the most celebrated piece of evidence you can have surrounded by your hands.I have so much evidence in my hand for Patrick to go to court next to her that we not only won the right to throw her out of the as one owned home, we were hand all of the proceeds from the public sale of the home too! It is imperative that you either write a check or money command the money to him, and NOT cash as you own no way of proving you sent him the money. A bill is just that, a subtraction.it does not prove anything. Pat's ex claimed we owed her 6 months child support.well I have every check ever written to her and we were not merely, not behind, but ahead by one allowance. She accused us of not helping next to school clothes which the peacemaker told her this is what child support was for.I have a check written out for ----- for school clothes, and be able to produce it contained by court. Because of the documentation we did all along she lost doomed to failure in court. We step back to court this coming Jan. and she will loose again because of adjectives of the things she is once again accusing Pat of and again we have proof she is a swindler. Our Lawyer told us one thing from the start,DOCUMENTATIONDOCUMENTATIONDOCUMENT... SHE WILL GET NOTHING AS LONG AS YOU CAN PROVE HER WRONG. And she won't Amy as long as I own a check book and a pen and I do tape adjectives of her conversations vie phone. It is against the law to tape someone within this state and her state unless they are for-warned that they are being tape at the very outset of the conversation. the conversations were not supposed to be hear by the judge but he hear them anyway because our lawyer told him we have them and he wanted to listen. HUH! He hear an ear full. He then know she was a storyteller. And forget about the parents going to put in prison .they don't seem to be doing anything to sustain you get out of him trying to achieve you for fraud. You need to reclaim Amy and her son..not his parents. For God's sake Amy keep archives. start writing checks or money orders..it is merely in your favor contained by the long run.
Document the abuses of your ex-husband and report an action surrounded by court against him so that he will be ordered not to commit the same engagements again.

Union Contract, Two people hired at like peas in a pod time, how do legally resolve senority issues?

Two society hired at the same time, how do properly resolve senority issues in a coalition contract.
Show me the source where I can research your answer. two individuals hired at the same time, same morning , same minute, what are the legal things you can use to pick who have the senority
Answers: when i was hired at matching time with a few otheres they held a "lottery" the lower the # we drew the more senority we have
Read the contract.

It's not a legal issue, it's a contract issue. The idiom of the contract applies. If the contract is silent on the question after the employer is free to make his own verdict.

There's no law that you can look up that say that, because it's simply a basic principal of directive.

It's called "The principle of legality", which is that EVERYTHING is lawful unless there's a specific law that say it isn't. That means that an employer can promote whoever he requests, *unless* there's a law or contractual constraint that says otherwise. If the contractual condition is to promote "the senior employee", but there's more than one equally senior employee, after he can promote whoever he wants, *unless* there's contract writing that says otherwise.

It's not an unusual situation within big employers where on earth a whole load of new trainees might adjectives start at 8am on the same Monday. If there's an initiate spot for one of them to be promoted, then the employer picks.

Richard
You would enjoy to look at the contract of "a" particular league as all enjoy some differences when looking where seniority comes into play. My historic experience, on both sides, is it does not matter as far as same hours of daylight, hour, minutes. It would come down to who was asked first(overtime) or who asked first (time off) Companies now and then if ever try to define this down to a moment, to some extent leaving it for the league to work the issue out amongst their members.

Since when is waterboarding torture? What else is torture?

Honestly, since when is waterboarding tourture? I always considered things similar to, cutting adjectives the flesh off someones arm next to a knife, or taking a belt sander to their unclothed chest or breaking respectively of their fingures with a tack hammer one by one or even putting their head within a vice and turning it till their eye popped out ( all horrible things that should never be done to a entity ) torture. Since when is, simulating drowning torture? It seems to me to be exact just a approach to cause nouns and enough discomfort that over a immensely long time it would make them speech, not actual torture. What's your oppinion on the subject?
Answers: I first learned something like what waterboarding is during a college French class during the fall semester contained by conjunction with a discussion of the French surrounded by the Algerian war for Independence. Waterboarding have been used for thousands of years, and be criticized because it elicited false confessions during the Spanish Inquisition.

It is an "enhanced interrogation technique" by which confessions can be elicit in smaller amount than five minutes. It does not require a lot of hose down -- I read of several instances during the Vietnam war where on earth a canteen full of water be used to elicit information. No, there is no marine that enters the lungs, but the subject react as though he were drowning. I will not describe how it is done because I do not want you to try it at home.

American military personnel are trained surrounded by resisting certain types of physical torture, but they really cannot be trained to resist waterboarding because here is no real bearing to resist it. It is an effective instrument of securing information, but it also has demoralizing effects on the martyr of waterboarding.
I think you should enjoy a session of water boarding and after I would resembling to see if you have impossible to tell apart opinion on torture.
Good luck!!!
Waterboarding or forcing information to prevent American death should be allowed.

What is torture? Having to listen to all the medium attention they give to Shrillary! It's everywhere, it's driving me nuts, I'm going insane and gonna crack any second!! AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...
If you don't consider this torture, are you likely to participate contained by a demonstration of waterboarding?

If we have question for you that you can't possibly answer (you don't know anything since you weren't there) do you think you would consent to yourself drown or make up an answer to stop the idea of being drowned alive?
Erm...so you don't meditate that immobilizing a party on their back and pouring wet over their face and into their breathing passage - thereby making them experience the process of drowning and letting them think that they are just about to die - not a form of torture?

You really think it's of late about 'discomfort'? Are you up for a demonstration to see only just how uncomfortable it can be?
u might wanna check out the dictionary buddy..torture is any kindly of harm to living mortal, such as psychological, physical, and any other kind of article that can be "scared."

HELP! PLEASE! they are trying to kick my sister out of college!?

They wrongfully accused her of cheating and give her an f on essay and i came surrounded by next sunshine to explain to the teacher that i watch her write her essay and the teacher be very mean with me so i get nasty hindmost and she went to the dean and in a minute they are projected their anger at me onto my sister and are talking in the order of kicking her out of school.Are we competent to file a lawsuit against the college?
Answers: Somehow I'm betting there's more to the story. Has your sister been within trouble before for any explanation? How is her attendance?
You are not a party to the situation and the educationalist had no use to speak to you.

I agree with the others..in that is something missing in your story.
nope. you never told us why they guess your sister wrote this.it was none of your business and your mouth i.e. causing here to be threatened near being expelled.you and your sister just have yourselves to blame for this.
------retired texas deputy sheriff------
if ur sister is innocent as u enunciate, u might wanna get a attorney for difamation and psychological harm, but if it doesnt work instead of wasting money on a legal representative u should hire someone to give the don a good scare-if u know wat i mean- b/c sometimes in attendance are certain cantankerous culture who like taking power of the power they have n ur sister be just caught within the web.
Really and no offense intended.

With of late your parent involvement and sister's.. things could be worked out and they might give her the benefit of the doubt. The university does not want to be sued and needs to prove the charge of cheating.

Later if adjectives things are calm they would consider the issues and possibly ask you to hold some input. The way they look at it is such. If she be not guilty then it would be freshly a simple thing.

Your making statements in actuality hurt her case. Why would you be so persistent? No crime so no reason to be ruthless. Nasty achieves nil.

Roommate has bailed and disappeared belonging. help?

i shared a place next to my roommate, but only my cross is on the lease (because i have correct credit). we got into a spar and she has vanished, taking only some of her things. she refuse to turn her key contained by although i asked that i be around when she comes for her things. it has be a few days and still no word. is there any decree or rule about her keeping the spare key? can she just come surrounded by here and take doesn`t matter what she wants while i'm away? and does she own a certain time issue to do this? breaking my lease/abandoning my place is an option right immediately and am not sure what will happen to her things if i do.
Answers: until she turns contained by the key she is still see as still living there so she is responsible for 1/2 the rent.

About her belongings.. write her a dispatch and give her 30 days to retrieve her things or at that point you become the owner.. You are required to store her things for a average amount of time, what is deemed resonable is contracted by the courts.. (usually 30 days)

So you best option is to dispatch her a letter giving her x number of days to retrieve her things otherwise they will afterwards belong to you and you will have the right to do anything it is you need to do.. I would also explain contained by that note that until the switch is in your possession she is still officially responsible for 1/2 the rent.

For your info... You are the person who is on the lease, but she is within essence your tenent, and is responsible under a month to month occupancy (no need for a written lease between you two but if you have one it would have be better.. but the law still see her as a month to month tenent).. Meaning she is required by law to make a contribution you a 30 day identify before she can move and is responsible for 30 days to verbs to pay rent.. She have not moved as long as she still has a switch. EVERYTHING is in your favor, and what you do is up to you.. Those are my suggestions .. so perfect luck.

Don't make the mistake of putting her stuff outside as you are responsible to transport "reasonable care" of her possessions until they are deem abandoned.

As far as her credit card knob... If she is residing at that address, maybe recieved post,pays rent..utilities.., stores clothing, does any act that she can show that this be her place of residence,.. it is perfectly legally recognized for her to gain access in any passageway to her place of residence. Even if she were to break a pane and enter it is legal as long as it is her place of residence.

Keep within mind.. Laws slightly differ from state to state.
I would check with the owner of the property and see if they can switch out the lock for you. As for the belongings, hold you tried to reach her on her cell phone? I would dally to see if she contacts you with the subsequent couple weeks before throwing them out.

The law vary from state to state about the length of time past a property is considered abandoned. Best of luck.
Doesn't issue if her name is on the lease. If she be paying rent (to you or to the landlord) she has a right to the place for the time she's compensated. She has to turn the key in in the past moving out. Property is usually considered abandoned after 90 days, but it depends on the state.

I jus recently get charged w. a misdemeanor4 attempt to commit battery. will this prevent me frm gettn a livelihood?

I just lately got charged near a misdemeanor for attempt to commit battery. i didnt in actual fact hit the person, tho. im contained by college now, and i needed to know will this misdemeanor prevent me from getting a ajob? and if so, what kind of job will i not be able to capture?
Answers: Well u can still get a chore, but unless they tell u that they don't except fellans consequently no
Only when you're applying for good job will they ask you about your arrest history. Judging by the route you wrote your question, you probably don't enjoy to worry in the region of that. Try to avoid getting a conviction on your record, though.

Should an employer be allowed to know the genetic makeup of their employees?

Answers: Only if you agree within order to go and get the job. You don't enjoy to give it. They don't enjoy to hire you.
NO

This is none of their business
Yes

Is sending US citizens out of the the USA legal jurisdiction for torture a critical evil in today's world?

San Francisco Chronicle, Sat., Dec. 15, 2007, "Ex-aviation firm worker say executive told of CIA "torture flights." An employee of a San Jose Calif. aviation company, Jeppesen International Trip Planning which is a subsidiary of the Boeing Co. be told by one of the owners that flights were arranged for the CIA to distribute five American Citizens to Foreign Counties for interrogation and torture, or "torture flights." The United States Government under G. W. Bush have asked that the evidence be squashed on the bases of National Security. This information is all right documented according to the lawyers who file the suit against the CIA, and the United States Government.
Answers: according to international law, is "any deed by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a human being for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third individual information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third personage has committed or is suspected of have committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any purpose based on nouns of any kind, when such distress or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public bureaucrat or other person acting within an official dimensions. It does not include pain or suffering arising lone from, inherent in or incidental to legal sanctions."[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture
Of course..

Look I am a devoted Democrat, but I don't believe 90% of the rubbish that most race in the f¨ēte are spouting and the other 10% would have be done exactly the same by Democrats if the rolls be reversed.

So, my suggestion is for all of us to go and get off of our lofty horses and stop pretending that everything we hear is the truth.
Anywhere the U.S. government have jurisdiction, the U.S. Constitution applies, including protected rights; which are NOT limited to citizens.

It would be a grave crime for the U.S. senate to send a citizen outside the borders of the United States involuntarily.
Yes, President Bush is bent on getting information in the region of these people from this evil group that hold sprung up ( there is other a cause that these associates join contained by every generation).
There are plots foiled everyday threatening this country. He can't let political party dictate the course of his actions to save these at bay. If he have to get them out of here to break them, consequently fine- we are at war whether the liberal, bleeding heart feel that these people's civil rights are one violated or not, because this is a war and the rules do not apply.
They are worse later Communists who put you in prison- these those kill you. They would be proud to rape and take out our women.
Torture is never necessary.

No evil is essential.

Not good things are sometimes compulsory, but evil, never.
No its not. We have plenty of dutiful torturers right here in the flawless ole' US of A.

The problem is that here we put them on Death Row. Saddam, Stalin and Hitler put 'em to work.

We need to put them to well brought-up use. And make 'em work for prison wages...lol:)

Is it really illegal to bear a tag stale a matress if so why please give me a source so i can do some mor readin

Answers: It's singular illegal to remove the label until the mattress has be delivered to the consumer. The function for this, is so the consumer is aware of what the mattress was made of.if you read the ticket, it will tell you adjectives of this,
I think it is crooked to remove the tag prior to Dutch auction.

More Questions and Answers:
[1864] - [2456] - [1254] - [2086] - [2473] - [28] - [2401] - [130] - [2183] - [1712] - [1428] - [1540] - [2571] - [575] - [2348] - [632] - [1206] - [2238] - [1565] - [521]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: