Law Questions and Answers

Medical Marijuana?

I live in California, where on earth it is legal to smoke next to a prescription. There are these little store front dispensories all over the place.. They supply pot like cig stores put on the market cigs. What do you think give or take a few it?
They even have signs on the door saw that they give doctor referral...

---

Answers: Really wow. I bet a lot of associates are happy to hear that crazy.

---

I reason it should be legalized with doctor's prescription for sure specified conditions only. I ponder the federal government is ignore some of the medical evidence about its efficacy for political reason.

Dana

Slavory again different question?

I asked the clone quiz previously about using them for slaves and most answers where on earth along the lines of we shouldn't enslave anybody and how that be a gross question(those who need to should look spinal column about 5 minutes). presently my question is this
How frequent of you have a dog or cat that you explain to:
when and where they can progress to the bathroom
You keep loked up at your house or surrounded by your yard
you detail what they can and can't eat
where on earth they can and can't go
whether they can even hold on to their reproductive organs?
that to me is slavery at its finest.
if you say animals don't enjoy a soul or they have fixed mental capabilities what make you think clones would be any different
the certainty that they look like you?
The source I asked that question is because several gov. are discussing it.

---

Answers: I answered yes I would because I believe they would be animals and if its trial to keep animals as pets or (slaves) what would the difference be save for maybe price?

---

Leave puppies out on the street and contained by the wild and they will die sooner. You forget that animals are not general public. The racists pigs who owned slaves forgot that too. When reminded, they didn't want to believe that that slaves weren't animals. How around you?

Would you leave your tot on the street?

---

I didnt see your other question, but here is my response..

Yes, we do yoke animals. We do it on the basis that they are animals, hold no soul, and relativly low cognitive abilities (yes, I know at hand are plenty of very smart animals, not wise saying there are not). When we start cloning humans, the clones will be equated to animals. I would love to ruminate it wouldnt happen that passageway, but look at history. Every group of people that we dont take becomes inferior. The blacks, the mexicans, the arabs, the muslims, ect. There are still a LOT of right wing religious ethnic group that believe cloning is wrong. A lot of these people hold national office. Even more of these people are constituents of those that hold national office, making their own opinions irrelavant to their political work.

Human clones will be perceived as having no soul because of the cold quantifiable way they are created (to play religious devil's suggest, is that any different than what God did.. and while some will recognize that as man true, they will say we are playing god, and thats wrong)

Anyways, to the culture who are against cloning, clones will be an inferior race to mock, put down and verbs. For some that are for cloning, the clones will be mere slaves or prisonors, with no rights, person grown simply to be killed for anything medical purpose of the 'real' person. This get into things like body farm.


I worry that once again we will own a whole see of people that arent considered society (like the black slaves, like women, ect) Remember, this big-hearted of prejudicism still goes on world widespread including the US with 'real' populace. What makes anyone ruminate that a clone, that a lot of family wont consider a 'real' person, be treated any different

When you find an illegal immigrant posted at your employer, should you a) name INS b) ignore c) smoke a blunt?

People drugs are desperate news , so...c is not the correct answer and a or b could trademark or break you.

---

Answers: Call the authorities, get the scumbag deported surrounded by a pine box.

---

B Ignore

Reasons for leagolizing marijuana?

---

Answers: Maybe we shouldn't. Look at what it's done to your brain. If we LEGALIZE it (note the spelling), we would effectively be lowing the IQ of society.

---

legalize marijuana and bring put money on prohibition for alcohol.

You never see stoners fighting over the bong but adjectives it takes is one drunk to bump into another drunk to start an adjectives out brawl.

---

There are many reason why using marijuana is a bad belief.
Cancer, laziness, difficulty driving a sports car, impaired mental qualifications... BUT that's not what you asked.

There are many reason given for why it should be legal. Some engender sense, and some do not.

Read, and decide :)

http://www.norml.org

Note: the site is manifestly biased. Always use your own judgment.

---

The solely real apology Marijuana is still illegal is that it is a weed, it will grow anywhere. Low soil, bleak light, associates are growing it in thier basements, closets, barns, everywhere they can. What do you think is going to transpire if the government make it legal to grow and smoke. People will be growing it adjectives over and the government won't be capable of tax it. Therefor the individual way they can verbs to make money on it is to preserve it illegal, and charge you a bunch of fines if caught "contained by Possession" of it.

Oh and BTW, before it be made illegal wager on in the 1930's almost 40 percent of the medicine in made within this country were Opiate base drugs. (Made from ingredients found in marijuana.)

Psyguy, I stand up to you find even one article that claims Marijuana smoking causes lung cancer or any other compassionate of cancer. Matter of fact if it did incentive cancer, then why would they prescribe it to cancer patients for strain and nausea?

---

Fast Food Places would make a slaughter on Burners with the Munchies.

Retail Sales would increase to replace the several items that got lost or misplaced. " Man where on earth did I leave my stuff".

Sorry but I hold yet to here a legal argument.
No one wants to really cook next to Hemp oil, Wear hemp clothing, or solve the get-up-and-go crisis by using hemp for alcohol cars. They want to get giant, eat cheetos, and spill out asleep laughing at bad small screen.

Should it be illegal-Personally its no worse than alcohol or tobacco for your health. It should be allowed and regulated just approaching they are. And by the way, employer should have the right to fire you for self high only just like the should fire you if your are drunk.

---

First of adjectives, taxes are not a legitimate basis for legalizing marijuana, despite masses people's contentions. Taxes should only be collected for legal government purposes, and the parliament doesn't need any "change cows".

The only valid motivation for legalizing it is the purpose that is should be legally recognized. If I smoke marijuana (I don't), and I don't harm anyone, what business is it of the government's?

Diane G, adjectives those points are irrelevant. The only law that should be passed are those that prevent one person from harm another. Since smoking pot, like drinking beer(I do) harms nobody surrounded by and of itself.

---

As you may already know, some claim it has a medicinal purpose. Look on the Internet for studies conducted on this subject, it's a awfully heated debate!

As for Mike, be more sensitive, you don't know how much this person have inhaled. Do use spell check above!

---

Government can tax it, approaching they do cigarettes and alcohol. If you compare the actual cost of producing packaging, and marketing it next to the going price, that leaves a lot of room for taxes.

Also, by taking it out of the hand of street dealers, you deprive them of the break to proselytize harder drugs to the pot buyers.

Valid argument or not?

When it comes to the issue of abortion people perform like the argument that a creature should be able to do what she wishes with her own body is this inpenetrable infallible reasoning for which at hand can be no answer. But change the subject to legalising prostitution or to using drugs and that same personage will say "Oh that isnt right!" Which is it?

---

Answers: Abortion, while wrong, should not be a concern for the federal government to opt, much less the Supreme Court.

Prostitution and drugs should be decriminalized.

The command has proven again and again its inability to enforce substantial sweeping prohibitions, or worse, sporadic or selective enforcement of the law. Every prohibition enact by the government have resulted in sizeable, usually violent, industrialized black market.

---

Prostitution has further reaching implication: the "john" is exposing himself and every sexual partner to the diseases carried by the prostitute and every person she have ever been next to. This means that the unsuspecting innocent sexual partner of the "john" are being exposed to potentially mortal disease. Prostitution is not victimless.
Drugs: Do you want to live near a crack house? Why not..oh the crime that ethnic group commit to get their drugs, the disease spread by drug use, etc. Then tag on to that the fact that your average drug abuser isn't a really productive associate of society - you want to support his tweaker ***? I sure don't.

Abortion involves one woman - yes their is a father I realize this, but any man who engages within sex knows full very well he has no input into the choice of the abortion. It's one woman - one choice - and not a soul else is involved or hurt.

---

You are correct that there is a discrepancy nearby. Although I am pro-choice myself, I will also point out that even a pure libertarian, who has no qualms roughly legalizing prostitution or drug use, can understandably be anti-abortion. Whether one is libertarian or not, the abortion question hinge on what sort of status a person see in a fetus or embryo.

The relatives you are referring to are not libertarian, and in certainty are a bit paternalistic. They apparently view drug use or prostitution as insanitary to the person performing them, and decriminalized abortion as helpful to the being who wants one.

---

You know the proverb that "your body is a temple" lets see in your mind`s eye that it is your house instead, and that you live in a subdivision. What you do inside that house is completely your business. However when it starts to effect your neighbors it become every ones business.

If a person requirements to take drugs it is their choice, and though it may not be a smart choice it is that being alone who decides to partake contained by such abuse. However when the assault starts effecting others, say the child of a user, or the loved on of a user, afterwards it becomes a larger issue. Legalizing Prostitution is one and the same thing. Who are we to enlighten someone how they can or can not use their body. To some that may be their only asset.
The argument is neither valid or invalid, it is irrelevant, because every situation is different, and because it is human humour for us to project our disposition into our analysis of anothers choices in natural life.
It is better to live and let live than to agree on the righteousness of others.

---

It is not just "her own body" if she is pregnant.

Prostitution and drug use may organize to an increase in the crime rate and for this rationale not in the public interest.

---

I suppose Drugs and prostitution should be legal because they are victimless crimes. No one have lost Life, Liberty, or Property when one consenting Adult pays another consenting adult for a drug or sex.

Abortion is a big issue next to most Americans because on one hand you don't want the establishment to what you can do with your body.

But instead, if life begin at conception (or sometime before birth) later that child has a God given right to vivacity that is protected by the constitution that begin long before birth.

---

This is indeed a valid argument! It take a man and a woman to conceive a baby. It isn't her right alone to wish to terminate the pregnancy. The sperm belongs to the man, so he have a perfect right to be involved within the decision to abort the fetus or not. After adjectives, it's as much his as it is hers.

How can I get a copy of Haas vs Nicholson?

I enjoy a claim filed near the VA and I would like to read the actual court document.

---

Answers: This is adjectives I could find right now, I'll hold on to looking.
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13...
http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/

---

http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13... write the VA for a copy.

I witnessed a confrontation the other day?

where on earth i saw aguy get into a bit of an argument beside a middle-eastern guy at my gym,and NO ONE stuck up for the middle-eastern guy.why?

---

Answers: Because it was nil to DO with anyone else - in opposition, there anyone over twenty of "YOU" why didn't one of YOU intervene.+-+

---

Because it was none of their business. People aren't promising to get involved unless it become a physical fight.

Jeez, more PC gone barmy

---

Well, you were here. Look in a mirror, and ask your self two question:

1. Why did I not stick up for the 'middle-eastern guy'

2. Why do I define and segregate nation by their ethnicity?

I suspect this will give you your answer.

---

Nobody stuck up for him because they be either racist, have a tribal mentality and stuck with their own or simply in recent times didn't agree with him. Who know.

Letter to magistrates?

my partner has a audible range with the magistrate to modify a child support decree. we live in a different state, 800 miles away. we own a disabled infant, and he cannot possibly appear before the magistrate. he have called the court, and be told he need to write a dispatch to the magistrate requesting to appear by phone, and explaining the circumstances. how should we address the letter? dear magistrate? you honor? lol, seriously, though? and is within really a need to progress into detail about our personal lives, or is the reality that he lives so far away enough for appearance by phone to be granted? how should the reminder be written?! thanks within advance!

---

Answers: Your honor is a right start. List EVERYTHING. REmember, you have to convince him to tolerate you do this; more is better here. ASk for permission to enjoy a telephone appearance due to the following reason and hardships; and inventory everything that keeps you from attending contained by person.

What are min. lending requirements concerning manuf'd homes?

---

Answers: swing from lender to lender

How to Check the RTI Appliaction Status?

Last month I submited a RTI application regarding my passport contained by Coimbatore Head post office. and get the RTI application no. so far no reply regarding that.. I simply want to check the status of my application ,,,can any one tell how to check the status of RTI application?

---

Answers: You can ask the concerned authoroties give or take a few the status. However, according to the RTI Act specific timeline is precribed within which the authorities are bound to afford the information. There is also a provision to appeal.

please refer the site below for more info:

http://rti.gov.in/

---

Click the link below to know more or less the entire procedures involved under the Right to Information Act

http://firstappeal.com/view_topic.php?self...

---

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

---

Answer question:

This question has already close!