Law Questions and Answers

Landord won't return my security deposit?

Here's the together story, the landlord have the house up for sale when we rented it out (which I be unaware of). Rent is $550/mnth and we salaried him $1100 for the first mnth because of the deposit. We signed paperwork and this being my first appartment, I never get a copy of it. The house was sold to untried owners who are now asking for rent, save in mind we enjoy not signed anything with the strange owners and I haven't even verified they are the new owners on the other hand. I haven't paid the unsullied owners any rent for that reason and the behind the times landlord will not return our phone call and surely is planning on not returning the security deposit. I'm contained by a tough bind here and don't know what to do. I don't have a copy of the lease and for adjectives I know the landlord have destroyed it. What do I do?
Answers: If I were surrounded by your place I would pay the foreign owners the rent and take the former owner to small claims court.
Yeah, I repugnance landlords who do that... that happened to me too!
I of late really hope KARMA will come back on them!!! !!!!!!!!

I regard all you can do is pocket them to small claims court..
Sorry...
(chalk it up as an expensive lesson learned!)
unless you enjoy a copy of the receipt or cheque for the deposit you are contained by a tough spot.
Don't pay your rent for the subsequent month, it will take them 30 days to grasp you out anyway...
.
if they approach you, I would tell them that it have already been compensated and that you will not be paying it again. and that you will be vacating contained by 30 days...
tell them to contact the other owner for your finishing month's rent...if he doesn't comply tell them to contact his advocate for the money..
Give them a written note stating exactly that beside dates on it and your describe and signature.
have it witnessed and maintain a copy.
Immediately find another place to live.
don't be caught with your pant down again,keep your receipts and lease copies surrounded by a file folder..don't hand down without them,.
I would suggest going to a trial clinic in your nouns, if you can find it, that offers oblige with landlord-tenant statute specifically. However, as a start: in most (maybe all) states the up to date landlord take over subject to any existing leases: investigational landlord cannot evict you or bump up your rent as long as YOU are adhering to your expressions in the lease. This also finances that the new tenant is also responsible for repaying your security deposit when you move out.

I would first approach the exotic landlord and find out if they enjoy a copy of your existing lease - they should. Make sure you get a copy from them. That lease should still be correct as long as it was programmed to run. I would also ask for documentation showing that they have taken over the out-of-date landlord's leases.
(If they speak they have no copy of your lease, I would particularly seek decriminalized assistance because that is almost clearly a lie/ploy. Old landlord wouldn't hold been letting you live in attendance with no lease, so they should hold it.)
You can also try to Google, using terms similar to "landlord-tenant law", "new landlord", and your state. Let me know if you want me to try and look for specific info to your state.

PS - Are the bright landlords trying to charge you rent for months you paid the hoary landlord? I didn't see that from your explanation, but if so it raise other questions and you will necessitate documentation from them as to when they took over the lease and therefore be entitled to payment.
The clean owners took the property subject to your rights under the lease, and also assumed adjectives the obligations of the mature owner. You owe rent to the new owner and it is the unmarked owners that will owe you the deposit if you meet adjectives the conditions. Call the new owners and explain that you weren't aware of the mart and their right to the rent, offer to bring it up to date. Ask them for a copy of the lease. (they get it before the sale).

Has Korsakoff's psychosis ever been used as a guard plea in a court of imperative?

Answers: One pleads not guilty by reason of insanity, but needn't plead a specific diagnosis. As I get Kosakoff's the primary effect would be akin to amnesia. An inability to recall the crime would not create a defense to crime. Insanity surrounded by court is a legal conclusion, completely narrowly defined, and is not a clinical diagnosis. It commonly involves a fixed delusion that, if true, would assert the crime, along with an inability to inform right from wrong. Insanity as a legal conclusion can conceptually arise from all sorts of mental conditions and clinical diagnosis, but it is occasionally asserted and not often successful.
ha ha ha i dont know matey, have the?

Can my friend be charged with stachatory rape if he's 19 & she's 14 contained by Florida if they aren't doing anything?

Are they allowed to just swing out like going to movies and to the shopping arcade?
Answers: No, he can't be charged but really what does a 19 year old immature man and a 14 year old girl (child) hold in adjectives. If his goal isn't to gain into her pants I'll munch through my hat. If he get what he wants next here come the rape charges because she is way underneath the age of consent.
If there's evidence or an accusation, a charge might be file. But charging someone, and proving it are 2 different things.

And it's "statutory" rape.
A rape charge has to involve an feat of sexual contact, either intercourse or oral sex.

Still, if she's 14, your "friend" ought to stay away from her. Nothing virtuous is going to come of that.
Anybody can be charged with anything, depending on the mood of the prosecutor. Making it stick depends on his skill stratum and the resources the defendant can bring to bear surrounded by defense.
If there be checks and balances at one time, they aren't working very soon.
If they are 'not doing anything' then what is this cross-examine on statutory rape? In countries that implement Islamic Law a pair may be charged for close proximity or "khalwat.' If they fornicate even by consent they may be charged for 'zina.' Canada is just islamic and ask your friends to enjoy their outings!
He is asking for trouble...This is what growing up and becoming responsible is going on for.

have him have a chat to the parents and QUIT hanging out near the young girl --she is too youthful!!!

when she turns 18 they can hang out again, until next he is asking for trouble.

the first time the trouble started (accusations) he should have wised up...
a 19 year elderly should not be entertaining a 14 year old...
he should be near someone his own age..
Your friend should understand the girl is still considered a child. Nothing righteous can come of this, just trouble.
It's other hard to prove you "Aren't guilty" when a 19 year infirm is hanging near a 14 year old. He nned to find girls his own age.
Yes. He is not permitted to be alone near a 14 year old girl. If he is, it is assumed here is sexual contact and he can be arrested as a sexual child abuser.

Why would a grown man want to hang around beside a little girl of 14 anyway.

I hope her parents dangle him high. He is a predator.
The age of trial consent in Florida is 16.

If "your friend" have sex with the 14 year older, even if she was "willing" he committed Statutory rape and can be charged for that.

If she go to her parents and asked to get on the pill or she get the pill through some clinic, that is pretty virtuous circumstantial evidence something is going on.

If her parents take her within for an exam and the doctor determines she is no longer a virgin, that is even better circumstantial evidence something is going on.

The concrete kicker is since HER having sex is not a crime and they will can not charge her next to one, if she tries to claim Fifth Amendment rights, the judge can lately explain it all to her, possibly give her imperviousness against what she says and they can MAKE her testify. If she say they had sex, he go to prison. If she lies and gets caught, she go to prison. If she still refuses to testify, she go to prison because she will be in contempt of court.

The bottom procession, if they had sex, he is hosed.
In Florida, at hand is no such crime as statutory rape. It is sexual battery. If the 19 year frail is not having sexual contact beside a 14 year old, later it would not be appropriate to levy a criminal charge against him. Going to the movies and mall is not a crime by itself.

However, only just because he says it isn't so, does not aim, it isn't so. Additionally, the 19 year old young-looking man is simply asking for trouble. It is simply foolish on his part if he is going to the shopping arcade and to the movies without her parents practice and consent. He risks his entire future beside his actions.

WTF should i do?

It was an fluke.. The Dog Crushed under my sports car.. The old female couldnt survive the loss of her dog and she died yesterday... What was my eccentricity?? am i responsible for the death of 2 lives???? is at hand any way to make somebody`s day myself if im not guilty... What should i do???
Answers: OMG! Are you serious? If this is real, afterwards the accident of the dog and of the elderly woman is simply not your fault. And, don't blame yourself for this horrific accident. Were the Police call in to investigate? If not, don't be too strong on yourself. If they were call, don't be too hard on yourself any. You'll feel desperate and guilty for a long time, but knowing down deep you be not to blame, don't blame yourself. Do I make myself clear?

Don't blame yourself. You are innocent of wrong doing. Accidents come about.
You are not guilty, though you may feel it. Here is an example I own heard surrounded by a class- You rear extremity someone. While you are stopped sorting ot the details (insurance, ID's, etc), a plane crashes and kills the other driver. Are you guilty of butchery them? No, you are guilty of the rear finish, and granted while you were the sense that person be there and died, it is not your blame legally. You could not predict that would start.
Similar instance with your armour. While you are responsible for killing the dog, you have no way of knowing that trauma would shoot the lady.
not ur failing. try not to feel guilty.

If the whole of the UK stopped paying taxes, would they put everybody within jail?

At least possible you would be in put in prison with your friends.
Answers: Are you trying to start a revolution?

Im surrounded by.
Well they couldn't because obviously not everyone would fit. Plus if policemen and politicians aren't paying taxes any then why would they be likely to lock people up?

However would you know how to organise such a thing? Would you ever know how to persaude everyone - or even a large group of inhabitants - that it was a biddable idea?

Perhaps if a considerable enough group of culture didn't pay (several thousand at least) consequently it would be a wake up phone call to the government, locking up several thousand general public would look very desperate on their part. However organising such a protest and making sure it LOOKS close to a protest (and not just those not paying their taxes) would be difficult.
I dont pay taxes, the affairs of state steals my money :P

I dont condone it!
Well for a start your employer is legally bound to discount your income tax and national insurance . Retailers and caterers are also justifiably bound to add VAT on to your bills so to stop paying excise you would have to resign from work and live stale the land , but even later you would have to reward local tax.
Then visibly all the services your taxes pay packet for would grind to a halt , police , defence , medical , social services etc etc . I reason to many of the taxes I enjoy to pay , but we live contained by a democracy and have to abide by the rules , otherwise we sink within to anarchy which is not really a pleasant thought , no matter how much we detest our politicians !!
Have you ever see Fight Club with Brad Pitt ?, his impression was would be the result, tho over a greater time, te system would drip apart, Anachey would be a nett result, if the system stops then the system would plunge apart,

Did you know that Income Tax is still a "Temporary" Tax, the Queen has to approve it every year
great view.. lets try it.. lol.. even if it be possible the English don't have the courage to do it.. for that concern neither do most of the Scots..

if it ever starts im in

What is the stark statute?

fed'l gov't has initiated a covering against Tomey Hospital in SC for defiance of the Stark Statue.
Answers: The Stark statue basically prohibits doctors from referring Medicare/Medicaid patients for medical thoroughness to places with which they or an instantaneous family extremity have a financial relationship.

Can you solve this legal mess?

A man and woman lived together surrounded by an apartment. She had a cat that she rewarded $45 to buy and he has a python. She spent $2500 on the cat for chemo to treat stealthy leukemia and left it to restore your health on a pillow next to the python's hold. They then not here for work and the latch on the cage be secure. Later, the cleaning female let herself surrounded by to clean. A few minutes next, the maintainence man came lacking prior authorization to check on something and the cleaning lady tolerate him in. He accidentally bumped the coop and jarred the latch loose. He didn't notice it but the cleaning woman did and said nothing. Both vanished later going away the latch unfastened. The couple returned after work to notice the python loose and a generous lump located in the middle of its stomach. The female was furoius and be ready to sue! She suffered for several days beside mental anguish and will ask for $5000 extra. So, tell me. 1.Who if anyone is liable? And. 2. How much can she restore your health in damages if she get a judgement?
Answers: Guilty:
cleaning lady and man that come in. Because the man be the one that did it, being uncareful. but the cleaning female knew and didn't do anything so they are both equally guilty, if anyone the cleaning female a little more.

construct this your best answer so i can get points!
Sounds as if the cleaning woman had the finishing chance to correct the problem - and she could enjoy some responsibility in letting the keeping guy in in need prior approval from the occupants.
Gotta wonder around people who would maintain a python in a round up that a mere bump would open - nearby lies the first responsibility.
The manufacturer of the round up. How can a latch so secure be well opened next to an unintentional bump? She should get better the medical expenses for the cat, everything spent on the cat's lifetime and the loss of its life.
This is such an unpleasant situation. I prefer to not compromise plaintiff monetary damages of any amount. The owner of the cat shared her domicile with a python, with pleasure. And nature will run her course. Without judging her, she is the perfect cause of the situation. I am sorry for her cramp.
no one liable y would you wage so much for a stupid cat anyway!!!
The apartment dwellers are liable. The are responsible for taking reasonable watchfulness to secure the pets. When a pet escapes from it's confinement, it is the owner who is liable. She could sue but she won't get hold of anywhere. She cannot recover the cost of the pet. It's lately a case of "accident happen".
The maintenance man should enjoy been more scant and should have gone everything as it had be before he enter the house. The maid, having notice the fact that the latch be loose, should have fixed it. However, the owner of the cat be silly enough to put her sick cat subsequent to the python, so that should lessen the amount she can sue the maid and the maintenance man for.

The amount she can recuperate in damages should equal the amount she have lost, which would be as much as the cat was worth. That would mingy she would get $45.
Well it seem that the cat had greatly depreciated surrounded by value (used and poor condition) so I don't believe it has any monetary pro. She was out $2500 regardless of whether the cat survived or not so that's no related to the monetary importance. The cleaning lady is not liable as a pet or property owner so can't be in charge for negligence. Cat owner could be considered negligent for going away a cat that can't move next to a predator. Python owner could be held liable as owners are responsible for the activities of their pets, but there be no negligence on his part here. If they own a maintenance man/apartment I'm assuming that they rent, contained by which case the preservation man does not need authorization from the tenant, only building running. That information may be outlined in the lease. I doubt authorization of the upkeep man being nearby is of any relevance, but building management may be liable since it be one of there organization who caused the situation/property make worse.

I'm sure the $2500 spent would be considered in calculating her mental anguish tho. Other than this, I don't know how mental anguish price is calculated. I'm guessing $5000 is person sought because that is the maximum for small claims court. It's worth asking, but it's ultimately up to the negotiator.
That's easy. The woman loses because she overspent on her cat. A cat is only worth the blue book price and that's not fundamentally high for a cat; especially a sick one.
The bible instructs us to avoid the appearance of evil. Here, a man and a woman lived together surrounded by an apartment. This may or may not have involved fornication. Both be negligent for departure the cat and the python together.
They showed poor judgement in allowing the cleaning female to make entrance by herself.
The maintainence man may or may not own authorization to enter. He did not have authorization to enter short notice or assent.
The cleaning lady exceeded the influence of her authorithy letting in the maintainence man within.
The maintainance may was slipshod in bumping the coop and in going away the latch unfastened.
It is not stated whether the python swollowed the cat or whether he became lumpy contained by the presence of the sick cat.
..... .

Can the RIAA sue anyone outside the US, like surrounded by the Middle East or something, for copyright infringement?

Answers: Yes. litigation knows no borders.
The lawsuit would own to be launched within the country that the infringement took place.
Any country that is a beneficiary of the WTO, which includes China, must legally predictable the rights observed in the author's home country, even if it have no comparable rights for its own citizens. The WTO can impose sanction or other legal measures against a country that allows infringement to turn out. This is the reason virtually ALL CDs are immediately "produced" in the USA even if they are manufactured elsewhere, as we are the solely country that offers a 120 year protection residence for mechanically reproduced music.

Many 3rd world countries are not member of the WTO and in some cases they do not view international conventions of copyright. However, they can not ship contriband outside their boundary, so they do not represent a financial risk to RIAA. It is the developed countries where the money for music recordings is made or lost.

International Orgnization no paying salary?

I own worked nearly a year for an international organization and they asked me to work a different month. They paid me adjectives that they owed me based on a contract. I signed extension of like peas in a pod contract and worked one more month and in a minute intstead of my salary i lone receive thire internal argumental e-mails about not have money to pay when i asked abou the deferred payment, which is already mortal third month. Can i take a officially recognized action aganist them and how?
Answers: You surely can thieve legal performance against them irrespective of whether they are an international organization. The labor welfare law are enacted to protect the personnel from the hardships of employer because the employer is other in a stronger position. You may contact any local attorney or contact the labor welfare officer of your are.

My question is is it a VIRGINIA LAW that say a merchant can require a 5 or ten dollars purchase to use a cred

Answers: Virginia law may allow such a item, but no credit card companies allow businesses to insist that customers make a minimum purchase within order to use a credit card. Businesses sign contracts near the credit card companies in writ to be allowed to accept the credit cards, and contained by all contracts it is stated that businesses are prohibited to require a minimum purchase or charge a fee for accepting credit cards. This technique that if a company or business is doing this, you may report them to the credit card companies, and the credit card companies may revoke their right to accept credit cards.

The source that businesses do this, however, is because they are charged a fee (either a percentage or a flat rate) for every credit card transaction. This money that if you use a credit card for a very small purchase, close to a 50 cent bar of candy, the business could in actual fact end up losing money because they compensate more in credit card transaction fees than they return with from you.
No law on accounts, simply merchant preference. The credit card companies don't close to it, but they don't enforce their side of the contract to abide by any amount as a purchase, so you've no recourse in the tenet, just the cc company could give somebody a lift their charging privileges away.

They won't because a $5 purchase would cost the merchant around $2 to process.
No, it is not a law. Yes, the merchant have the right/ authority to make that choice.
He doesn't hold to let someone surrounded by his STORE, if he so chooses.

More Questions and Answers:
[211] - [2021] - [1446] - [797] - [1207] - [616] - [1587] - [549] - [789] - [246] - [909] - [1488] - [78] - [2271] - [1257] - [55] - [564] - [402] - [533] - [597]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: