Law Questions and Answers

Do restaurants own the sidewalks?

I was within San Francisco today, and down at Fisherman's Wharf, my father and I bought some food from a little street-side booth. There be lots of tables for sitting, but they be all jam-packed, so we kept walking down the wharf and came across a restaurant that have a lot of table, and not one customer eating outside. So, we sit down and started eating. We're drinking for about 20 minutes, and eventually one of the waiter comes out and shouts, "hey, these aren't picnic tables, this is a restaurant. You call for to leave." I only nodded and said okay. I be a little ticked, so I took my sweet time preparing to go off. Eventually I just forgot give or take a few it, but then I get to thinking... how can they tell me to set off the sidewalk? My dad and I discussed it, and he pointed out that technically the city owns the sidewalks. I said perhaps they enjoy permits, but I truly have no perception.

So, was it trial of them to kick us out?

Answers: don't know roughly San Fransisco but in heaps places businesses are responsible for sidewalks(keeping them clear of snow, trash et-cetra and restaurants have use for outside dining) the city does preservation. the business definitely owns the table and chairs and could ask you not to sit in them. you would enjoy to check with the city to find out the authority of it in San Fransisco. since it be a waiter and not management it may be that properly they could not demand you not use the table or it could be that they could emergency it and as such the management know they did not have to be involved. contact city mayor/manager for more information.

no the city does

Fmla - how soon can i quit working question?

I hold been beside my company for 8 years, after the birth of our youngest child my husband and I have granted for several reasons, that I am going to be a stay at home mommy for a few years. I would really resembling to gain employment with this company again when the time is right. Here is the situation, I do not fetch any of our health benefits, my husband does. So simply I put money into 401k and get my paychecks. I enjoy been on fmla for 12 weeks and this week (13) took time off. I am wondering how long do I need to skulk before giving my 2 week sense? I am not sure if after being on fmla you hold to return for a certain amount of time so you do not hold to pay subsidise the wages they paid you while you be on leave.
Does anyone know anything around this???

Answers: fmla provides unpaid leave
since you own no benefits the company should not have be paying anything for you. if they continued to put money into your 401k then you will hold to repay anything they put in for you as okay as possibly any matching funds(only possibly will depend on company policy not law). if you want to step back to work at some point contained by time you owe it to them to let them know your plans right away. they had to by regulation bring you back contained by a comparable position with comparable clear. if they kept a job available for you afterwards you owe them the courtesy of letting them know your plans as soon as possible.

EDIT:
if the company paid anything for you or to you that typically you would have have to pay yourself consequently you will have to repay that amount. it does not business how long you work when you go subsidise, you could work for 30 more years you still owe them anything they paid on your behave. FMLA is unpaid give up your job.

How far can my employer make me drive to get something done light duty work i live within mi and work in tenn as a truck driv

i am a truck driver and my permanent status. is in tenn and i live contained by mi i was told that they can just make me drive 50 mi is this true according to tenn workers comp law

Answers: Your doctor is the person who will determine how far you can drive. You enjoy to make sure the WC doctor is the one who give the work restriction, other non WC doctors don't count.

The Doctor should decide what the restrictions are for your return to work, not the employer.

How can I become a California resident?

I know in lay down to be a ca resident, I must have lived within the state for 366 days. But in adding up to that do I have to be at lowest possible 24 to be an independent student? B/c I looked up the info online and requires a lot things: vote surrounded by ca, get a license within ca, bank acount, etc.

Answers: Residence for resident tuition purposes requires a year's residence, an intent to REMAIN contained by the state (voting registration, etc., is evidence of this), AND financial independence. If you are below 18 and not married, your residence is almost always your parents' residence. You enjoy to be 24 to be considered financially independent without insinuation to support from your parents. From 18 through 23, there are miscellaneous ways to show financial independence, but the usual is showing that your parents hold not claimed you as a dependent in the prior year.

Here is a full explanation. It is from UC Berkeley, but the other campus and CSU are pretty much the same.

http://registrar.berkeley.edu/Residency/...

Once you move within you are a resident but you can't go to colleges minus paying out of state rates until you have be here a year. If you establish residence or get a charge, you have to gain a California Drivers License. You will have to reregister your sports car when your current license runs out. If you bought a new motor shortly before moving contained by, you will have to take-home pay the difference in sale tax from where on earth you were to where on earth to the county you move to.

No tolerance?

someone told me their son's school be no tolerance i was chirpy for him then i be told that there is no tolerance for the truth or combat not no tolerance for the racist blacks, crazy islamo facists or the communist. seriously what is going on in this world when kids cant come to blows in college yet cram how ot pray to mecca?

Answers: In the USA, "zero tolerance" school have rules that, if you break them, you catch suspended or expelled. In some cases, that policy is proper. In other cases, it is wrong because it doesn't even allow someone to carry over-the-counter drugs close to aspirin.

i don't understand. what are you aphorism? kids should fight instead of praying? that's what it sounds similar to to me
~>>hannah

You're an idiot

Who cares wat religion or see people are? Seriously, we're adjectives equal. This is whats wrong with the world at the moment, we're adjectives at each others throats! And I don't indicate to sound resembling I'm preaching but seriously what ever happened to peace? It's christmas time! Lighten up.

"What is wrong when kids can't skirmish." Schools who want to prevent fighting and prejudice are the answer, not the problem.

Should marijuana be left to the states to regulate?

Federal regulation is mostly because marijuana be rated as Schedule 1, alike as heroin, in the 1930s on the pharmaceutical rating level.

Answers: Yes it should, all drugs should be gone to the states and the federal ban right in a minute is in vandalism of the constitution.

It remains illegal because home production of it is glib and therefore it cannot be Federally Controlled and "Taxed". People will eventually lessen their use of alcohol surrounded by favor of marijuana and the Feds will lose tons of revenue generated from alcohol taxation.
It's possible to trade name your own wine and brew your own beer but most people don't really bother. If marijuana be legal everyone would simply be tossing seeds out surrounded by the yard and waiting for the yield.
That's why the Government hates marijuana!

What is a Freeman?

I live in New Zealand, I hold heard of a legitimate status one can achieve call being a freeman (or man of the land). In this you are supposedly simply governed by the top power (god). Laws of the government do not apply, instead you are just accountable for debt or devastate to others. Common law is the foundation of any legal dispute...

Is this for unadulterated?

Answers: In the USA, the term "freeman" come from endentured servitude. Many times, men and women could not afford to come to the new domain from England on their own. They made a pact with a business that they would work for them for a specified time interval ( years) to pay past its sell-by date the cost of the trip. When that time period be over, that individual was considered a "freeman". I am not comfortable with your definetion, but I am not discounting it. I am solely speaking of this term as it applied within the United States. I hope this helps.

Growing weed in California?

I hold a good friend of mine, who be offered an opportunity to grow 70 plants , paying for nothing, but recieving 30 percent of profit... I told him it's the worst impression ever, but I think the view of so much money is all he can expect about... Can you guys convey me what the penalty would be...worst and best scenario? I want him to see what kind of trouble he could take in earlier he makes this outcome...it could jeopordise his wife and 2 children too right? Help me please...

Answers: here are two California Health and Safety codes.

11358. Every person who plants, cultivates, harvest, dries, or processes any marijuana or any part thereof, except as otherwise provided by statute, shall be punished by imprisonment within the state prison.

11359. Every person who possesses for mart any marijuana, except as otherwise provided by law, shall be punished by custody in the state prison.

As you can see by the punishment of state prison, it way the crime is a felony. This could severely affect his wife and kids.

That would be. Possesion, Possion with intent to traffic/Cultivation beside intent and on and on.

Each would be a felony and time in the "Don't drop the soap zone" followed by parole.

Smoke em while you can.

If he be just growing it for his personal use it wouldn't be THAT big of a do business. But because he is growing such a large amount, it would most indubitably be a felony, which, as I'm sure you know, carries stout penalties.

Parent agreement for crossing borders?

My mom and I will be going to the U.S. soon, and my dad isn't coming with us. We inevitability to make an agreement notification and to have him sign it so we can cross the border. What do we write?

Answers: This is a apt idea. While not an complete requirement it could help prevent any delay at the border.

Title the document "Letter of consent to travel". Have the father type it up and sign it. It just requirements to say something close to..."my spouse has my consent to travel near our minor children (A, B, & C) from Canada to the U.S. entering the U.S. on aprroximate date of X, and returnign to Canada on approximate date of Y. Have him sign the letter and return with it noterized.

p.s. There is a 99% chance the lettter will not be looked at by anyone at the border, but it could be considerate on the slight chance any question come up.

If your parents are divorced the court order probably restricts how far they can pinch you without the others consent.

In California it is a standard. May be contained by Canada too.

If you are a minor you are not allowed to exit the country in need the consent of both parents. They will not allow you out of the country without the form. It is not a simple dispatch that you can write on a napkin, it is a proper form that must be filled and signed by the parents. I signed one for my daughters but do not know where on earth the form was obtain. I would expect you can download it from the Canadian Government website.

Is gender seperation contained by a public school decriminalized? What about item confistication?

Last year, some seventh grader flashed someone on the bus, so they punished the eighth graders.

They sit all of the boys on one side of the cafeteria, and the girls on the other.

It go on like this for just about 4 months.

Also, they used to have "cell phone checks". They would not issue a notification, warrant, or reason for checking, excluding you went to their conservatory. They would bring a bin in, and you would enjoy to hand within candy, gum, CD's, iPods, CD players, cell phones, baseball cap, Gameboys, fancy pens, and doesn`t matter what else. If you did not give something up, they would pat you down and give somebody a lift anything they liked, which they would not provide back until the closing of the year. (Candy, gum, and other small items were thrown away.) It be always a mannish staff member that pat you down, male or feminine, and you could not request a female staff extremity.

Is this even legal?

Answers: the simply illegal piece is the male staff pat down the females

gender separation is NOT unlawful in school other wise the adjectives boys and all girls school would be closed.
not to mention I would have a actual problem with my girls man in the boys P.E. class after elementary also.
however by canon confiscated items have to be returned to parents upon request otherwise holding something that is to say known to belong to another personage without their consent is robbery.

You have controlled rights in school.
They need a foundation to search you.
Example: They believe you may have a gun. The sexual characteristics separation is not legal.
It's a type of segregation.
Try getting some endorsed advice and relating your parents.

it's probably very illicit for a adult manly to pat down a female child. but i don't really know. I cogitate lunch separation is legal, they used to do that sometimes at my university. The item confiscation chunk is up to the school.

C'mon. The kids know not to bring cell phones and iPods to arts school, so why bring them? They should keep them contained by their backpacks, but not surrounded by pockets and such. Kids text answers to cheat and certificate pictures of tests and stuff.

I suggest they should be allowed to have them contained by their backpacks for personal time and after academy, but not on their person. college is for school, not iPods.

The first article about seperating boys and girls is legalized I think. But I still muse it's unfair that they punished the wrong class.
Second of all I ruminate it's illegal to give somebody a lift away things that aren't bad similar to drugs or something. At my school they would rob away your hat if you wore it contained by class but would give it hindmost at the end of the hours of daylight.
last, Isn't that sexual singling out? You should tell a parent or trusted full-size if you haven't already. Get some friends to help you out and possibly even call some society that deal with this features of stuff.
I don't know much about this but I hope I help. Good luck!

"It was other a male staff bough that patted you down, masculine or female, and you could not request a womanly staff member."

Thats against the law. Someone mentioned that gender segregation isn't dubious because there are adjectives boy and girl schools. What he fail to understand is that those school are private school, which contained by a public school it would questionable. I'm tendency towards illegal on the sexual characteristics segregation because if all the public school did this for ten years straight, society as we know it could be severely damaged.

What state are you from that this happen in?

We live contained by a metropolitan area and students can be checked at any time- but they do use females to pat down females and males for males. They can confiscate items- and not return them until the call a halt of the school year. The student manual probably states what items cannot be brought to school- so that is a limitation for the students.
I think the concern of the flasher was not handle well- what happened to the flasher?

School is for erudition not boyfriends/girlfriends, not cell phones, handheld games, etc.

First of all some things will depend on your arts school districts policy. When it comes to teachers "Patting down students " I do believe the coach may be on thin rime when patting down a student. If a lecturer suspects something not right the proper procedure shoulkd be to take the student to the on site police officer if your institution has on or the principal or dean of discipline.

Now for the candy or gum maintain that stuff in your locker you do not call for to graze durring class. With regards to cell phones Cd's Ipods disc Players cell phones should be either disappeared home or in your locker. These things do not belong within a classroom. Teachers have a right to confiscate objects that will interfer near a students learning process. Base globe caps anything that can be related to gang colors should also be vanished out of the classroom. Become leaders not followers Work together with your classmates instead of surrounded by competition with one another. Also if you enjoy a friend that is struggeling manage out and help him/her by toutwering them and studying together. Tutoring fellow students will result within reinforcing what you have well-read and help a friend. DO not do the work for your friend but show them the steps they stipulation to do to solve the task at appendage.

There is time to be a kid, time to be a student and a time to become all that you can be. Ask yourself what do I want to be doing surrounded by 5 10 15 20 years and go for it. Good luck

Gender separation is faultlessly legal lower than federal law. Some provisions of the Education law that prohibited federal funding from being used for single-sex instruction be removed a couple years ago. Now, it's legal unless state ruling says otherwise.

Cell phone checks nouns suspicious. They can do a pat-down search if they enjoy a good result in, not just because you come to arts school.

I'm assuming this is a public school. If it's a private arts school then both are permitted.

I think the pat down is illegal no event if it is male or feminine. Not even a Police Officer can do that unless he has probable wreak or is arresting you. They can't walk up to a citizen and turn out them for no reason. They would be violate your 4th amendment search and spasm rights. They don't know if you have any of these items they are a moment ago looking so they have no principle to search you. If they see one contained by plain view they should know how to take it because you are in public breaking a rule, assuming it is against the rules.

Have you noticed when you run through any metal detectors they tell you to transport things out. They don't reach within your pockets or pat you down. They may use the wand but they don't touch you with that. They won't tolerate you pass because you are setting sour the alarm but they can't search you.

I imagine they are in defiance of inappropriate touching because not a soul has the right to put their hand on you without your go-ahead and without end in. This is Just My Opinion as I see the Law as written.

More Questions and Answers:
[1833] - [2374] - [444] - [655] - [2316] - [1228] - [2007] - [677] - [1927] - [1214] - [2024] - [584] - [1479] - [411] - [2435] - [1274] - [1003] - [2134] - [550] - [1827]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: