Law Questions and Answers
Unlawful possession of marijuana in trial york?
i was ticketed near unlawful possession of marijuana and i was wondering what my option are and if i should see a lawyer.the cops who pulled me over made it nouns like if i make available up my dealer than i could win away without a conviction or are they of late b.s.ing me. what should i do
Answers: in proposition, they could give you a accord if you give up your trader, but if your dealer finds out you give him up, the cops may be the least of your worries.
What associates don't understand, when you budge to court, the law is on trial as economically as the crime. This is why we go until that time our peers. To prevent an over zealous government. I will explain. If the elected representatives passes a tenet that says adjectives run away slaves, caught in the north, must be returned to, the owners within the south, we as citizens can find the slave not guilty. Because the law is iniquitous. This is what took place in the 1800s. If we find the tenet unjust to put pot smokers within jail, because we must clear taxes to keep them confined, and they are not a problem within society, we try the law, and find it is unmerited.
this is the belief of the old supreme court and our founding father.
Remember government like chaos, it creates more senate! All in the track of protection and safety.
Get a advocate. even a misdemeanor conviction for drug possession is a very serious point.and it will affect your employment and career option for the rest of your life.
You should unsurprisingly agree to give up your salesperson, but get a advocate to advise you on the accord.
English law, why are questioners wishful thinker?
When people ask a interrogate which is a legal situation, why do people thumbs down answers which are correct surrounded by every aspect, but aren't the words they want to hear?Common mistakes people generate are an incorrect belief that shops must accept returns on items which are not blemished (they don't have to!) or that reception goods or money surrounded by error makes them theirs (again it does not, everyone is entitled to be paid fair mistakes, even bank or mail command companies) so why do people constantly look right through and give the TD to nouns answers in benefit of the mistaken belief they can get something for zilch?
Answers: The thumbs down symbol is intended to be for answers which do not address the question or are not adjectives. In this section, they should be for those who read aloud "I dunno" or a variation of that "you have need of to consult a lawyer/citizens advice bureau".
Unfortunately as more and more question have become mere expression of view, more and more people are using them similar to voting butons on how closely the answer mirrors their own views or prejudices.
The Thumbs symbol have all but become redundant, it should be abolish - it is devoid of meaning.
I concur. In any category 75 population can answer a question and the entity posts the same press again hoping for that one person will demonstrate what they think.
Answers shows that you can explain even as if they be face to frontage and they just don't gain it or are unable to infer outside of the box. That translate to the TD. No thumbs down needed if you post an opinion yourself.
The process I look at it is that most people on here aren't trained to be a attorney. If anyone wants endorsed advice, they are at the wrong place. I agree, I administer TD for an answer that is totally unrelated to the quiz, harassing in temperament, aimed to advance someone's political agenda (we can answer a ruling & ethics cross-examine without bring within things like liberal magistrates v. conservative judges, it does not support the analysis one bit), and finally, an opinion that have no explanation (would it kill you to hand over a reason for your evaluation, something must have prompted you to reckon the way you think).
I see ambiguous views adjectives the time and that is the temper of the law. You can't enjoy a case next to just one gala and one point of view. We can discuss anything, but it's a bit unyielding when the person doesn't even know the directive OR at least bring the time to research it before they resolve to give their evaluation.
For example, I can ask a question in the order of the infamous McDonald's coffee case and I bet I will grasp answers like "she should not enjoy gotten a dime for burning her tongue." That's clearly wrong (and deserves a TD) if you have read or hear of the facts of the case. She did not in recent times burn her tongue, she had third-degree burn to her groin nouns, painful, eh?
Unfortunately the thumbs down workings is available to everyone on Y/A, responsible or not. It used to be available for questions and be much abused then, as race thought of it as a mechanism for cheering or jeering the questioner. Some general public have admit using it indiscriminately just to annoy culture. We can't change human moral fibre.
You'd be surprised how far this tendency go. I have hear of people employed as legalized advisers at a extremely high even getting into trouble for giving correct advice to their bosses when this did not tally near what the bosses wanted to do. A lot of citizens like to avail yourself of legal yes men and women who will concur near what they want. It is not surprising, therefore, that Y/A participant should indicate annoyance with what doesn't ensue to suit them!
A lot of times when people ask for guidance on any type of message board or forum, they actually want confirmation, not warning.
I don't agree with that, but unhappily, it's true. I've been on tons of messages boards where on earth people win sooo defensive when you disagree beside them.
As far as YA goes, it's not freshly a problem on the Law and Ethics board... it's widespread. I've posted 100% correct answers and still get thumbs down. I just pay no attention to it.
You will find that time and time again people ask guidance hoping it will agree with what they want to do. If it does not they will reject it. it is the perversity of human character. Most people on this if truth be told know the right thing to do, it's lately that they are tempted to do the wrong point and are looking for some justification
Is international law a tenet?
i want answeres in a veary detailAnswers: International decree is a very specific branch of directive... if you want more of an answer than that, then try not man so demanding of an answer in "veary detail" and try PLEASE and THANK YOU... it works wonders.
Is it leagal in California for someone to be walking around thier front courtyard?
with a riffle within thier hands?Answers: No - christen the police! Using guns in the outdoors (unless they are hunting, of course)- or possessing them outdoors is against the imperative.
If they have a license for the gun.
but that`s still freaky.
i hope not.
otherwise I don't wanna walk outside again..
Check with your local police.
There are abundantly of variables.
eehh thats a perculiar thing to be doing? uh if youve get a license and only fire the gun on a count a self defense . . . . after id voice. . . whatever melt yur butter?
Legal Studies: Law and Public Policy.whats the point of having it?
if i'm a attorney and then i get hold of a maters degree within Legal Studies: Law and Public Policy...can that lead me to becoming a university professor??? is near something after it i need to study...or is it a surplus of money and time?Answers: If in reality you are a lawyer afterwards you have a Doctorate contained by Juris Prudence and can teach within any University in the world.
If you don't know the answers..you hold been wasting your money. Try concerned in class.
Do you agree with this statement?
Have you ever looked at the concept of map within the criminal equality system? They intend to map not only offender but the children of offenders. I own a theory that the purpose of inter-agency working, ID cards, DNA trialling etc will one day organize to a society that is totally controlled and supervised through a computer controlled bureaucratic political affairs subsidised organisation. They've sold everything else! Schools already use a system of fingerprinting and ID cards so that our children can have their dinner. I enjoy no doubt that the worst piece about this will be the reality that the government will charge us for the privilege of total monitoring whilst employ a company incapable of fulfilling the role. I'd be interested in audible range of any company that has be successful in fulfilling this role. I'm not sure why our organization wrote the 1998 Data protection act or why they own ever entered surrounded by to conversation regarding the human rights of individuals.mentor.northeast@yahoo.co
Answers: To some extent, similar thoughts own crossed my mind. My wife has given birth to 3 children within the last 2 years, adjectives of which were DNA "tested" (by law) inside 48 hours of birth for a handful of VERY obscure diseases they hold no cures for. It occurred to me, if they store this info, not lone will their DNA be on file for adjectives criminal IDs against them, any crime THEIR children, siblings, parents, grandparents commit could be detected as well!!
VERY 1984...
Your tinfoil head covering is too tight.
Richard
Not to disagree with the smart-*** answers you hold already received but this is old report.
The Gumint (government) is spending billions compiling assorted (DNA, retinal scan, fingerprint, face recognition) databases on John Doe Citizen.
This is supposedly bent, but, considering 9/11, they are doing it anyway.
Big Brother is here and now!
haven't you hear about the VERICHIP ????
Please, please use Google or some other seach engine,
and reseach the Verichip program!!!
The Verichip give me the creeps.
The company that owns Verichip is Applied Digital Solutions
(ADS )
ADS is owned by another company called Digital Angel.
And ADS will be doing business as XMark .
The undeveloped premise is that ADS will insert a microchip under the skin. The chip simply holds a long hexidecimal number.
The number will be "better" after social security numbers
and "better" afterwards drivers licenses. The process it works is that the number will be linked to a colossal national and eventually global database that stores your christen, address, age, etc.
What's more, ADS is now on an upward curve the chip so that it contains a Global Positioning System detector in it.
So everything you're chitchat about have already begun.
It is a recipe for even more mishandle of, and contempt for our human rights which are rapidly eroding.
Perhaps in the future hackers who get into Government computers and infect programmes that are used to browbeat us will be our new hero.
totally right prison planet and its all starting to surface and is , everyones a suspect everyones monitored through all in attendance big brother technology , face confession cams , biometric finger printing (in a school effective you teaching your kids for the future), rfid chips on everything even within your arm because its gooood and much much more all for our sanctuary all this information is and will go into the command central database giving an overview of everything you will do .
it will be sold on the hindmost of fake terrorism resembling everything else and most will prob eccept it .
watch this essential viewing you wont see this on tv ----> http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?doci...
How to contact police with no phone?
right in a minute my phone is'nt wroking and i need to return with a hold of the police. does anyone now if nearby an email to get a hold of them. i own two toddles sleepig and my babysitter wont retrun my two month old home she emailed me clich¨¦ she be here at 8pm and it's now 12am and afterwards i get an eamail motto the car broke down and i know they hold 3 carsAnswers: if I were you I would be pounding on my neighbors door and ask to use their phone!! I cannot find a mode to call online, but if adjectives else fails chunk a rock through the neighbors skylight, the cops will come, just settle up for the window!!
glad you get ahold of them, hope all is very well and that your child is safe!!!
do you hold a neighbor? if so, go in attendance immediately; except; put the babies in the sports car and drive immediately to the police;
if you can't do that email a friend and own them call
nearby are numerous things to do. but do it now.
Go to the police station or a neighbor's house (to ring up from there) immediately. Take your children beside you.
What do u do if u contact by FBI?
Answers: I'm sure they will tell you the object they contacted you, and just lug it from there.
If there be no laws?
let say, everything explicitly illegal very soon suddenly has no punishment--would you rob advantage of this and do discouraging things? and if so, what would you do?Answers: Yes, in the total denial of laws, and to hang on to the order, I would probable used methods that normally will be importantly illegal. Lets say aloud it would to be a new Sheriff within town, and no harm could come to any one underneath my watch.
I muse my morals would remain the same. People who want to do impossible things will do them whether they are illegal or not. Like, if stealing tvs from a store become legal, with the sole purpose people who consistency they are entitled to it would actually pocket a tv and not pay for it, whereas empire with different morals would probably verbs to believe that it's right to compensate someone for their work.
One side note: if drugs be legalized, more people might try them but overall crimes and murder would move about down and people would be physician monitored.
You designed to say "everything is LEGAL immediately, right?"
Anyway, no, where is your moral values? I won't allow myself to sink that low. Legal and moral are not like peas in a pod. Even with everything anyone legal, moral values remain.
Hey if in that were no law, then i'd whip a gun and shoot the no good G.W.Bush!
HA HA JUST KIDDING.
If within were no law, i'd be the end of the world as we know it!
HA HA
Picture the Watts Riots carried out throughout the USA and that would grant you a fair view of what would happen.
Why do migrant famlies in Michigan bring more money/food stamps, per family?
Take the struggling single American father or mother of two or more children, working two/three job to make ends come upon,can't even afford propane,gas for car,etc.. they procure turned down in asking for more assistance from local agencies, but take a intricate look at the mexican migrate's Why do they get more food stamps and extra perk, education salaried for, nice cars/trucks/nice places to live in etc...Going on within my town right now!Answers: I don't surmise there are special rates for assistance for immigrant. They shouldn't be getting cars or trucks from welfare places. How do you know how much they get and how big their family are or what their income is. If you are working two or three jobs you probably earn too much to receive assistance.
You are mistaken.
Look at Snopes.com
This fallacy is fully address, point for point, as there have been another flurry of propaganda spam mail asserting what you've posted.
The financial requirements are the same across the board for public assistance. The one and only exception to the rule is for Cuban refugees and, lately, Iraqi refugee.
If the immigrant family falls below the income smooth, they will be eligible for benefits. If they don't fall below it, they won't.
You are singular venting your frustration and hold no actual supportable evidence that what you are inferring is true.
More Questions and Answers:
[413] - [558] - [1730] - [683] - [748] - [40] - [992] - [354] - [359] - [289] - [628] - [1989] - [2075] - [1172] - [415] - [877] - [1778] - [1159] - [1100] - [660]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: