Law Questions and Answers

Do you know any cases of government official convicted under RICO law?

Whether at the federal, state, or local level, enjoy any government official been convicted lower than the federal anti-racketeering laws?
Answers: The Gambino crime household is one. Frank Tieri, the first Mafia boss; There are also several others listed who be tried but not convicted.

Why should we be concerned of poorly informed public?

Answers: Because in a democratic state where on earth people vote on public policy issues (or for representatives who do) poorly informed elector will make poor decision that will harm us adjectives.
Being uneducated leaves the public adjectives to false propaganda.

In every arena, personal, business, political, religious, financial. If you are uneducated roughly whatever the topic or situation is, how do you know that what you are mortal told is accurate?

For example, the marijuana issue. It was originally made wicked due to racism propaganda. Now that the racism issue isnt working, they play up other things. Its dangerous, its a gateway drug, ect ect. The gov doesnt want it court because they and pharmacutical companies manufacturing marinol label more money with marijuana anyone illegal. (Do some research, also, I own links in several of my previous posts about this subj)

Now, I am not trying to turn this into a debate over marijuana, but this example shows what happen when the public is uneducated. Most populace believe that it is illegal because of how dicey it is. How few people hold actually done the research and learned themselves on mj or why it is illegal?

Drugs?????

im doing this debate at school and im a prosecutor. my situation is to keep someone who sold drugs contained by jail. any concept becaus the person im going against, the defendant is really accurate at what he does sooo if you have any suggestons going on for what i should bring up then please answer my interrogate even if u have to nclude your own experience or someone else's. THANXXXXX
Answers: Maybe you should look at the defendants specific situation back you go adjectives gung-ho on him.I know its your job to hold people within jail but what if he widely read his lesson by now..noticeably if you need counsel on how to keep him nearby you know your case isnt that strong.I cogitate drug charges are clogging up our jails.While I dont believe surrounded by drug use I feel the punishmets are too strict!Sorry to vent but it really is a silly system!
Depending on the drugs, get pictures of relations who have done it, stories of what happen to their lives and what it has done to their bodies. Especially meth, that shiz will rot your body.

Would you save some body's time?If by doing so,your own life would be also within jeopardy?

Answers: Yes.
Depends on circumstances.. for eg- I wouldnt give away both my kidneys to someone who's dying of kidney letdown and kill myself but I would throw myself surrounded by front of a moving bus to save someone within its path..
It shouldnt be that I put myself within danger and even so I cant save that someone I'm trying to liberate, that would be a pointless waste of my go..
I'd like to give attention to I would - but I don't think anyone know until they are in the situation. Freeze to the spot, or skip into action - til you are contained by it, you don't know how you'd react. I am a rubbish swimmer, so hope nobody ever relies on me to be the lifeguard!!!!
Probably.

Ex. It would be difficult to keep under surveillance someone burn to death trapped within a car if I could possibly attain them out.
Might I get burned or possibly kill trying to help them? Maybe, but I would still do it.

Would I bearing into a blazing car wreck knowing it is too belatedly? No.
Yes, I think most clad people would rashly, it is in our disposition unless you are a coward.
Soldiers and police officers do it on a on a daily basis basis.
YES i would salvage anyones life!! :-)
if it be Gordon brown or George Bush . certainly not!! because i don't believe contained by suicide . i would certainly be throwing my life span away. as those who saw me wast my effort contained by saving rubbish would definitely put me to death right now.

if it was anyone else Id risk my existence for theirs or yous with out thought
Up to a point yes. It's one of those things be you never really know how you will react, and respectively situation you could react differently.

I would approaching to think so, but I don't know if i.e. realistic.

I'm unnerved of heights but would achieve a child down from a roof top. Would I put myself in front of a gunman for another fully fledged, especially one I didn't know.not so sure.
Probably but not intentionally putting myself at risk.
I wouldn't knowingly put my duration at risk, but may well do so surrounded by trying to save someone vivacity.

When you see someone at risk, and realize how you could save them, you commonly are unaware of the risks you are putting yourself into.
I haven't knowing save anyones life, I wouldn't donate a kidney, and do not give my blood, but contained by helping people within other ways, I have sometimes put myself at risk. For instance collecting someone income for an elderly person, puts me at risk of self mugged for the money.
But everything we do comes with a risk.
that would depend on who it be. There are some people I would not urinate on if they be on fire

I'm 19 and got a DUI...?

i get it a couple months ago.. do u kno how long they will suspend my license for.. my alcohol level be ... 0.01% which was nought i had with the sole purpose drank 2 beers at da most. im in the state of california... the piece is that they didnt even take my saloon away or anything (meaning they didnt even take me to da station). the productive stop was for speeding...and dats when they smelled the alcohol.. i have more ppl wit me.. the funny thing is that i work for my insurance company so it kinda suck cancellin my own policy.!!.. do u hold any answers or me?
Answers: Hmmm sounds like you hold a problem with alcohol surrounded by your life. What do you estimate of that?
2 beers for a 19 year old is unlawful whether you were driving a vehicle or not.

I hope they take your license and you do put in prison time. You're a menace.
Bad state for DUI, especially underage drinking?
Suspend drivers license for up to 2 years, AAA meetings, driving classes, possible send to prison time and definite probation time plus pass judgment might ask for radom alcohol/drug testing. All of that will cost you money, some surrounded by one time payment and the others every time you attend a class or try-out.
I sure hope you don't lose your job over it!
VC 23136 makes it "unlawful" for a personage under 21 to drive near a BA of .01 or above. It is not a crime (and it is not "DUI"), but it does call for DMV doings. VC 13353.2 provides for a license suspenson. VC 13353.3 says it is for four months (so long as nearby are no priors). I am not a DMV expert, and don't know whether this argument works with DMV, but if you tested at .01%, the fringe of error for the testing apparatus would mean that you could ably have be below .01%. However, DMV may take the position that it does not situation what you "really" were, adjectives that matters is the exam. It couldn't hurt to ask for a hearing and receive the argument.

Typographical error in a decriminalized document?

i am about to sign an considerable document concerning money. but i noticed in attendance are 3 typographical error in date. but the error would benefit me.
i would just similar to to know if they could still "correct" the typo error once i have signed them.
does typographical errors within legal documents be changed?
Answers: A court will enforce what the party agreed to, notwithstanding the typos.

So, in your situation, this is what will surface. On March 31, 2009, you will expect to receive your money, in accordance near the date on the piece of paper you signed. The other group is not going to pay you, because they agreed to 2010. So, you sue them. A regard as being will look at all the evidence, and if the peacemaker is convinced that the agreement was March 31, 2010, and that 2009 is an error, after the judge will enforce the 2010 occupancy.

In legal gobbledygook, it's called "reformation." You can dance to the findlaw dictionary and read the definition.

http://dictionary.lp.findlaw.com/
As a general rule contractees cannot purloin advantage of a specified typographical error.
Generally they have a duty to phone such errors to the attention of the contracting party. One justification is to determine whether it is in certainty an error.

** Note: The above is not legal suggestion, but a discussion of the legal issues presented by your quiz. Local laws or your specific circumstances may vary the common rules. For a definitive answer to your question you should consult local permissible counsel.**
you should be honest and bring this to the court's attention.

My ex won't move out and the police say I obligation to evict her.?

We have 2 boys and she cheats on me. She go out till 4or5 in the morning. I own the house
Answers: Go collaborate to a lawyer. There is justification they go to conservatory for a long time.
If she lived with you, yes you want to go through the court system. It's not thorny. But legally you cannot only just kick someone out of your house.

Will i face charges?

my friend be driving a car registerd to me (that i own been letting her drive for yesteryear 5 months) and she decided to jump to a pharmacy drive through, say she be someone else, and obtain this other person's backache killer.

we know this other character (the one she took the rx from) and the person call the cops. I had no model my friend was going to do this, be not in the sports car, i have no copy and i was at work adjectives day (which can be verified).

the human being that called the cops know that i have zilch to do with it but requests to bust my friend. that is without a flaw fine with me. here comes the doomed to failure part.

i used to buy a few from the being that has the rx, and when they detain my friend, she will try to bring us both down with her. i haven't bought any surrounded by a couple of weeks, and my system is clean, the vehicle i drive is clean, my apt is verbs and my record is verbs.
would what she tells the officer be considered heresay? or could i facade charges (with no physical evidence
Answers: Unless the one bringing charges against the one who stole the rx brings them against you too then you hold nothing to verbs about.

STAY CLEAN it is surrounded by your best interest for YOUR LIFE. Stay away and run from anyone that lives an addiction lifestyle.
Don't worry nonetheless. Keep cool, stay calm, and if you are question, lawyer up directly. Say NOTHING until your lawyer arrives, no situation what the cops tell you.


...and stop doing drugs, later you won't have to verbs at all. And as a side benefit, you'll be much happier sober.

Is there any means of access to subpoena someone if all you hold is their email address and their former employer address?

My former employer owes me over $11,000. I am suing to obtain this money, but I obligation to subpoena someone who works or worked (I'm not sure) for that company, and I don't think he will be a ready witness. He lives in New Jersey, and I am suing contained by New York. Thanks!
Answers: Witness subpoenas must be served in individual. They do NOT have to be served at the person's residence, so if you can locate him within NY at work or otherwise he can be served there.

** Note: The above is not permissible advice, but a discussion of the allowed issues presented by your question. Local law or your particular circumstances may rise and fall the general rules. For a definitive answer to your interview you should consult local legal counsel.**
Ask a process server. Those guys are relentless. Look for his current address on the internet. If you can't find it yourself, here are a lot of websites you can wages to find him/her for you, like intelius.com.
If still nought pans out, put an advert in the article and pay for information.
An attorney and process server would know.

Why do Dems hate freedom and equality?

With that control of the Federal command and with FIERCE DEMOCRAT OPPOSITION (sound familiar), the Republican congress and President passed constitutional amendments exclusion slavery, extending the Bill of Rights to the states, guaranteeing equal protection of the laws and due process to adjectives citizens, and extending the right to vote to persons of adjectives races and background.

The Republicans in Congress also enact the nation's first-ever Civil Rights Act, extending citizenship and equal rights to people of adjectives races, colors, and creeds and providing equal rights of access to adjectives public accommodations. However the Supreme Court struck down the legislation eight years subsequent. It wouldn't be until 1964 that this act would be reborn.
Answers: And who is making the homosexual population within TODAY's society equal? Certainly not the republicans who are trying to ban gay bridal in every state.

I dont know adjectives the details about the history of these law, but today, it seems the republicans are the ones who can`t stand freedom and equality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Socie...

I imagine this be what you referring to when you said, "It wouldn't be until 1964 that this act would be reborn," which be all done by a Democratic President, Lyndon B Johnson.

You can also check out this page from wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_...

Where on the intensely first paragraph of the Article, "Origins," it talks roughly speaking how Democrats (although they were not call that at the time) were against a strong federal administration, and fought to have more power put into the states hand.

Also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stat...

I am not sure where you get your facts for this, but you might want to do some research that can easily be done on your own time formerly you pose another question.

More Questions and Answers:
[341] - [1240] - [943] - [2567] - [370] - [2212] - [624] - [2455] - [1845] - [1826] - [1099] - [1246] - [8] - [867] - [48] - [1512] - [2462] - [638] - [908] - [134]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: