Law Questions and Answers

Why is executive privilege legal when it's not sector of the US Constitution?

And since it's not a part of the Constitution could it be legitimately challenged?
Answers: because those are the rules for the inhabitants, to whom the rules that govern us, do not apply
The US Constitution allows presidents to invoke executive privilege when they want to ... It's part of the separation of powers. Executive privilege allows ...
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story...


There should be zilch that is not applicable by the US Constitution and what is currently up. The US President should not be allowed to be "legally" corrupt otherwise why bother having a US Constitution.

It should be challenge otherwise the US President can be an emperor.

Imperial Presidency - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The author wrote The Imperial Presidency out of two concerns; first that the US Presidency was wild and second that the Presidency had exceeded ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Pr...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Two...
It's not surrounded by the constitution, but it's not prohibited by the constitution either. So congress can move about either path.

If i quit my job can my boss reasonably not pay me my ultimate check?

im thinkin about quiting my duty, maybe even freshly walking off.. but culture are advising me that my boss might not permit me get my ending check.. that cant be legal right?
Answers: Not properly, no he cannot withhold money he owes you for work you preformed; even if you owe him money unless you signed something saying he could. If he withhold your check, go to the labor board.
If you quit your employment he/she may have you sign a formal notification adressing your reasons for quiting, you enjoy the right to not sign it but by Law they must pay you, your finishing check for the times you worked. . It is however, better to give your 2 weeks identify if you plan to use your current employment as reference..Good Luck!
Bytheway, they may not recompense right there and next. It may be mailed to you..
He must pay envelope you. However, he can deduct from your rate any expenses you owe him. Make sure you turn in any and adjectives company furnished tools, uniforms, etc. earlier you go. Just a limitation to play it safe. Some employer will file criminal charges of pilfering against you if you remain in possession of their property after termination (not regularly, but some do). Document everything just within case, it will abet your case should you hold to get the Labor Board involved.
No he cannot withhold any of your reimburse
If you give spy as required by your contract, he can not hold your last recompense check.

However, if you simply walk rotten the job short notice, he can hold the later paycheck for damages as you left him next to a sudden vacancy which could mar his business.
You are entitled to be paid for every hour that you work. That self said, there are like mad of employers that will withhold the money until ordered to pay cheque be the labor relations board or by a court.

Is it legal to video cassette someone without here knowledge surrounded by california?

Answers: in publi c places, yes but you are irrelevant to trespass or obtain video on private property.
Under consistent circumstances. For example, you videoed a robbery or mugging in progress.

New Jersey abolished the departure penalty today, do you muse Texas would ever do something this stupid?

Gov. Jon S. Corzine signed into law Monday a guess that abolishes the release penalty, making New Jersey the first state within more than four decades to reject capital punishment. The bill replaces the loss sentence with time in prison short parole. Other states have considered abolish the death cost recently, but none have advanced as far as New Jersey. The nation's last execution be Sept. 25 in Texas. Since next, executions have be delayed pending a U.S. Supreme Court judgment on whether execution through lethal injection violate the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Now I know other states may follow, but does anyone out the have an idea that TEXAS would ever do something this stupid?
Answers: it will become a cesspool for even more crime, this is the worst law they could enjoy passed. New Jersey crime is among the nations worst and this will individual help to increase it. Texas will be the ending state to abolish the death cost. I dont think directive abiding citizens shoud cede rights to criminals. The death cost is usually reserved for the most egregious acts of crime andshould remian okay in place. Look at much of Asia, where on earth caining (sp?) is punishment for simple crimes, the crime rates as a result are incredibly low.

I fint it ironic that libbies hate means punishment but have no qualms over abortion.
I hope so. Try reading a book call "Better." Then ask yourself what exactly society is accomplishing. Not considering the reality that Christians make up the majority of this country and follow the "ten commandments" etc etc etc

I could be in motion on forever on this subject, basically population who justify slaughter people who wipe out people is purely plain retarded.
what makes "execution" different from murder?

" Who have the right to take away what he can not create?
Beyond the power of the conscious, beyond the power of the state"
Sammy Hagar

Edit:
so not a soul seems to resembling my answer huh? thats cool. just a point of clarification here. I also contemplate abortion should NOT be legal, it too is murder. obligation proof? if a pregnant woman is addicted to drugs and loses the child as a result she can be charged with murder. yes it have happened
Texas could do something this stupid, they elected Bush governor didn't they? I cogitate they learned their lesson next and probably won't do anything about the destruction penalty until the courts breed them. The death cost is a waste of money, if we are going to use the disappearance penalty later our courts and prosecuters have get to get it right the first time, in recent times to many mistakes are made very soon. Then we need to set tremendously strict guidelines for the death cost and take away the human perspicacity part.
Once adjectives the bugs are worked out:
1 Conviction
1 Appeal
1 Execution

EDIT:
soccerbum1982 - it is that conservative christian population that supports the death cost so strongly.
Or course Texas would never do this, the right-to-lifers that go ga-ga nutso over abortion would never repeal capitol punishment.

In my judgment, only one party wrongfully executed, one innocent person, is root to stop the process. At least if someone's contained by jail, and innocent, they still own a chance to be vindicated. Dead, not much, eh?
It have been shown statistically that possessions punishment does not reduce the murder rate. The merely use of capital punishment is for revenge; it have absolutely no dissuasive effect.
The U.S. is one of the few civilized countries which still wipe out condemned prisoners, and I think Texas is one of the bloodthirstiest ones. It seem to be a custom there. George W Bush proudly signed over 150 demise warrants while governor of the great state of Texas.
How abundant innocent people did the state take out?
No, Texas would never do something this...smart.

Over 100 people from death-row across the country own been released due to DNA evidence, I bet you would get the impression differently if you were on the other side of the argument, wrongly jailed, held from your relations, and killed for something you didn't do.

Any by the bearing it costs us MORE money to execute someone than to jail them for energy due to the endless appeals and allowed expenses.

And why is it so many religious ancestors who go to church every week believe it is ok to execute someone, I don't believe eye for an eye is in the ten commandments.
What? The state where on earth the criminal George Bush was governor? No route!

He's the "dead or alive" guy, the murderer of innocent men, women and children.the murderer of American soldiers.

His state followed him like a dog chasing a rat.

Sooner or after that, however, the death cost will be done away with. Then Texas will a moment ago have to traffic with it.
Sooner or after that, Texas will carry out like peas in a pod kind of comprehensive study that lead to the passage as this bill contained by New Jersey. New Jersey did the right thing and surrounded by the right way. It instituted a year long study commission up to that time taking up an abolition bill. Among the many witnesses earlier the commission were family of murder victims who do not support the death cost. I have given a cooperation to the commission report, below.

You don't have to sympathize near criminals or want them to avoid a terrible punishment to ask if the annihilation penalty prevents or even reduce crime and to think roughly the risks of executing innocent people. Your interview is much too important to settle lacking thinking about these.

125 general public on death rows own been released near proof that they were wrongfully convicted. DNA is available contained by less than 10% of adjectives homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent people.

The demise penalty doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the loss penalty to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The release penalty is neither. Homicide rates are difficult in states and regions that own it than in those that don’t.

We hold a good alternative. Life minus parole is now on paperwork in 48 states. It ability what it says. It is sure and swift and uncommonly appealed. Life without parole is smaller amount expensive than the death cost.

The death cost costs much more than life contained by prison, mostly because of the legal process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent individuals.

The death cost isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants with the worst lawyer. It doesn't apply to people beside money. When is the last time a loaded person be on death row, permit alone executed?

The death cost doesn't necessarily help family of murder victims. Murder victim ancestral members across the country argue that the drawn-out departure penalty process is hurting for them and that life minus parole is an appropriate alternative.

Problems with speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent general public released from death row have already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent person.

Would this be copyright infringement?

I sell digital art on ebay, mostly photographic manipulations. I own a shot of a champagne bottle with the given name clearly showing. It has be altered to look more like a fine art, in any luggage the name is noticeable. If I were to market it would it be considered copyright infringement? If the label be blurred to the point it was unreadable would that spawn any difference?
Answers: If any protection in the bottle exists, most plausible it would be in trademark ruling. For example, the Coca-Cola bottle shape, as well as the Coca-Cola mark, are famous trademarks. Copyright and other IP rights may play a section as well, but it's impossible to influence under the rough facts you've presented. Of course, you should not publicly disclose any more details.

In short, your use of the bottle in your digital art infringes the bottle's trademark if your art creates a prospect of confusion. This area of trademark tenet is actually pretty complicated surrounded by my opinion. Thus, I strongly suggest you contact an attorney if you agree on to pursue your artwork further.

For a general discussion on the use of trademarks surrounded by artwork, I suggest you read the article I link below. It's a nice introduction into the statute that you may find helpful.

http://www.venable.com/publications.cfm?...

If you want to avoid any permissible problems altogether, the best way is probably to want permission from the champagne company. Who know -- they might actually resembling your artwork and appreciate the free advertising.
copyright and trademark infringement yes.

the shape and color of the bottle and sticky label may be protected elements of trade dress.

see www.chillingeffects.org for definitive internet copyright info.

If i am 16 and have have my license for under a year can i drive siblings?

and how do they know if they are your sibling?
Answers: depends on what state you live within.
yes you can as many as you want but solely immediate line
after a half of a year you can drive next to anyone.
If the how your talking more or less is the police, then im sure in that are ways of finding out if your related or not.
Yes, but it depends on the state.

U.S. citizens have never be required to carry permit. With the Real ID Act, that is starting point to change. Your passenger should get State IDs and convey them.

If anyone asks, your word and theirs should be good satisfactory to establish they are your siblings. If your passengers are not siblings, any policeman should know how to get them to come clean it.
It depends on your state.

And most states will let you drive your siblings. They don't "know" it's your sibling (unless you enjoy documentation on hand) but most police officers will thieve your word for it (or call your parent to see). You should call for your local DMV - that's going to be your best bet.
You can drive, but they have to be belted within the car and you can't articulate on your cell phone while you are driving.

Kansas has only just beefed up its form belt scandal to include it as a primary offense. I just love beuracracy.

It's unmerited how the states sucked up to the insurance industry like they did.

What is the difference between an amendment to the constitution and a us law?

Why would one notion be better as an amendment rather than of late be made into a law
Answers: An amendment is set within stone. It's really hard to move. If they pass a directive, the next Congress can repeal it.
Although law are enough to do almost anything, Amendments trump law. The Supreme Court will therefore over-rule any imperative which conflicts with the Constitution.

For example, Congress not long considered a law to deny wicked aliens born in the US citizenship. This regulation, if passed, will never take effect because it conflicts near the 14th amendment says that anyone born surrounded by the US is a citizen.

In order to enact an amendment, they will involve 2/3 of the Congress and 3/4 of the state legislatures to ratify it. This is not undemanding to arrange, which is why we have few amendments.
A federal directive is enacted by a majority vote of both houses of Congress (the Senate and the House of Representative) and the signature of the President.

An amendment requires: any (a) a two-thirds approving vote of both the House and Senate; or (b) an application from two thirds of the legislatures of the States, followed by ratification by three camp of the States. That is why there hold been solely 27 Amendments and, literally, thousands of laws. Creating amendments is too bulky as the simply way to create law.

Meet The Parents - Home Surveillance Legality Issue?

Anyone who has see Meet The Parents the scene with the motion activate hidden camera's to i.e surveillance babysitter accomplishments, would this be legal.?

As it is your own home here should not be a problem with it? but your are still video tape people in need there practice...
Answers: There is no expectation of privacy when you are a guest in anothers home. People set up "nanny cams" to monitor their children at home with the babysitter, or mysterious cameras to catch thieving housekeepers and this practice is legalized.
This depends on the state you live in, but I am pretty sure this would be unlawful without some type of posted disclaimer (i.e. "These premises are monitored by video surveillance") somewhere distinct either outside or insane your house. You most clearly cannot use hidden camera footage to benefit from someone else's schedule without their consent. However, I am not completely sure on this issue because you hear contained by the news how some ancestors catch babysitters and such doing against the law things in their houses.

How slow are the wheels of sprite?

My neighbor is a thief. I hold watched adjectives summer while he steals job supplies from the family he manages to con into hiring him. He have 2 criminal cases pending against him. One for lying to an officer give or take a few who he was contained by 2005, and another for theft by taking contained by August 2006. He also has a recidivist charge since he have been convicted of pinching and arson, among other things, before.
I antipathy watching him rip off the worthy people of our county. His finishing victim be an 80 year old man. How long do these things usually appropriate?
Answers: Until the DA is good and equipped with evidence virtuous enough to convict, because you acquire only one adjectives, unless he insists on his right to a speedy trial.

There are probably higher priority cases surrounded by your jurisdiction for the limited resources the court have, and it is not in his interest to own a speedy trial most likely, so it could be a while...I don`t know up to 18 months or even more.

Remember, he is innocent until proven guilty in a court of directive.
Not only dose the criminal facade present charges , he will face long residence ones also. Most court records can be publicly veiwed .
In appendage to various employer , average people resembling us can make a determination of weather to "adopt a person" or let them "burn within hell". Some people due coppers however, TIME usually plays a deciding factor on this.
Remember "Actions speak louder after words".And "The one on the bottom is really the one on the top."...lol, words of wisdom from a fellow state officer.
Other things to run in to description are dates of the occurance and situation not purely the charge(s). You really need to money attention the dispositions of the cases as Well ..
1st Cor. 12:12
Just slow ,,,,,,,,,,

What should be legalized first marijuana or prostitution? u have to pick one?

Answers: isn't prostitution already legalized?
I've been paying for sex next to the same woman for 23 years immediately, and paying and paying....

EDIT:
thepopeyebob - totally understands
I love my wife, ouch, I love my wife, ouch....
marijuana, not that I smoke it don't you know..
you can draw from a prostitute in las vegas its permissible.
Besides I have what resembles a prostitue that lives beside me, dear lord I apologize for that..
but I've been paying for what I bring back since I married her.
dear lord I apoligize for that too.
prostiution-aids/diseases
or...
Marijuana isnt bad for you. Its merely illegal because Harry Anslinger
(head of treasury within 1930s) was have his multibillion industry threatened, so he appointed his nefew as head of harmful drugs and narcotics, secret meeting were held to try to find a course to make one of the worlds best resources out of the style. Eventually the made a movie called "reefer madness"(look it up on google video[not on youtube]). All it did be tell lies to trick the unrealistic americans into teahing thier children not to, and so on. America has be suffering eversince. in the 1920s it be predicted that all sports car fuil would be run an hemp, but those greedy bastards had to be in motion and screw up everything for america. if you realy thought go to norml.org (gives frequent facts of benifits of marijuana + pro-legalization of marijuana) if you have any question or would like to know some accepting info when chosing where you stand you can email me (yahoo, if you scan these please dont delete my comment for this) nirvana270793@YAH00.com
if we ever want to receive a natrual resource that was falsly accuse of wrong doing we must make our voice heard (norml.org, ect.. email me if you want to know ways to stand for even-handedness, [also sory if you dont care for politics but he can realy comfort, as he is the only presidential candiday that will confer about the taboo subject, due to the creeps of not getting elected Ron Paul, you can go to ronpaul2008.com]
Its a plant not an evil drug (also can be used to replace 10-20% of potentialy addictive and costly medications)

More Questions and Answers:
[1627] - [471] - [1467] - [754] - [2304] - [1853] - [2453] - [110] - [1763] - [699] - [497] - [918] - [1189] - [551] - [1940] - [2492] - [475] - [2233] - [260] - [1946]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: