Law Questions and Answers
Opening statement for a roe v. wade debate?
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=81s6q0k&...im suppose to write an opening statement/paper for the roe v. wade valise but i have no view how to start it. i know that in the initial statement im suppose to summarize the paper, but im have trouble with it. can anyone furnish me ideas on how to start it or wat to put surrounded by my paper? its requests to be 1-2 pages and its due tomorrow.
Answers: The fourth amendment and the right to privacy. Where does it lapse?
An effective slit statement tells a story. You singular use facts, not argument or conclusions. The jury that hears the story can form its own conclusion-- and the course you put the facts together in your story will determine what conclusion the jury comes to.
So, you get going by listing every reality in your stuff that's favorable to your side of the case. Then you weave those facts into the form of a story.
That's adjectives you need to know to draft a unbeaten opening statement.
Is it legal to own a gunrack in a vehicle next to a gun on it in california?
I hold a shotgun would it be legal to put it up contained by the back windowpane of my pickup in california? unloaded obviouslyAnswers: Yes, because this is not a pistol, revolver, or other concealable firearm, you may legally possess your unloaded shotgun upon your vehicle's gun-rack. But by adjectives means, do not simply take my word on it, see what the State of California, Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General have to say going on for it:
“Nonconcealable firearms (rifles and shotguns) are not generally covered in the provisions of California Penal Code section 12025 and and so are not required to be transported in a locked container. However, as beside any firearm, nonconcealable firearms must be unloaded while they are being transported. A rifle or shotgun i.e. defined as an assault weapon pursuant to Penal Code 12276 or 12276.1 must be transported in accordance next to Penal Code section 12026.1.”
*/End of Line.
Only if you be transporting it for cause. By that I imply you are taking it to a gun shop, gun show, to someone to legally go, or to a range or hunting. Carrying it to "carry" it is unsanctioned in California to enjoy in your sports car, but you are allowed to transport it.
Also you can have ammunition surrounded by the truck so long as its not within instantaneous reach of the driver or contained by a lock box. If you have a single shell inside reach of the driver and the gun - its considered "loaded" by the imperative and some prosecutors will go after you for it. (some wont).
No, you cannot.
First of adjectives, you need a concealed weapon certification to carry a gun surrounded by a car. "Concealed" routine that it has to be out of verbs.
Federal law covers the transport of firearms, and say that it needs to be locked contained by the trunk in a out of harm`s way container.
Well, I'm not going to get best answer for this, but Superman is correct. There is no state tenet generally making the OPEN carrying of an UNLOADED firearm against the law. There may be some local ordinance which does so, but I doubt it. Note, however, that the police have the right to examine the weapon to fashion sure it is not loaded. (PC 12031(c).)
How long does it take for a latest law to come into effect?
I found out just about this new imperative that governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed that said that gay students can use the opposite femininity bathrooms and locker rooms (like a boy who cosideres himself a girl using the girl bathroom.) I was wondering how long would it run for that law to be live? I tried to get more info but I couldn't. If you want to see this article walk to http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/articl... Thank You!!Answers: *The time frame in go into effect is stated in the the bill it's self.
Lol... Who know?...Especially, if it's ex parte.
Is keeping sabbath a moral law ceremonial tenet or a dietary law?
Answers: It's a religious regulation.
Well it's considered a day of The Lords rest.
It is the 4th commandment not a canon. Exodus 20,Ezek 20:20
It is to be kept holy
Laws are ordinances (subject to change)
Remember,We are not below law we are lower than grace.
Moses ceremonial laws be abolished after Christ resurrection, not the ten commandments
Yes it is surrounded by various parts of the trial testament. Rev 12:14
And it refers to it the day beforehand the tomb was found available.
The pagens worshiped (idols) Ishtar (oshtar), a female SUN (not SON) goddess of fertility(lol..little did they realize after it was the that sperm be alive,before the egg) ,verbs in gold ingots (condensed sunlight), and had a symbol of an egg (google : easter) (lol...chocolate bunnies and colored egg's own nothing to do near Christs resurrection)
The pagens feasted on sundays and the christians fast from friday sunset to saturday sunset.( there be no 12am)
The pagens made a law of no work on sundays.
And over a couple hundred years, fast sabbath keepers become sunday feasters.
Even the wearing of a ring (being placed on the finger) was a pagen sign of sexual copulation or takeness.
Hey...The bible warn many would be lead astray, and one day judgement would come.
I sent a holiday letter to a educationalist that I thought still worked there.?
I sent it today, this mentor quit on October, I thought he stillworked there but I call later to the university after I sent it and they said he no longer works there since October. Will they dispatch it back to me or will they forward it to his home address even though he quit on October(2 months ago).
If he get fired on October (which I'm thinking he did but not sure), will they forward it to his personal address or will they send it subsidise to my address ?
Answers: Check with the U.S. Postal Service for a time length on how long they will forword mail.The university doesn't decide if he get his mail, he does. He would own had to put surrounded by a change of address near the Postal Service.
When a letter is recieved to a company or management organization, the company or body is not obligated to forward on the letter.
If the conservatory has the reminder, you can ask them if they could forward the letter to the teacher's ultimate known address. If the instructor has moved surrounded by the last 12 months, the post bureau should redirect the post to the clean address.
Not much else you can do except for re-writing your letter and sending it to his/her home address.
G Government?
Explain what "right" of assembly are guaranteed by the constitutionIn what ways might you exercise these right
what methods would be unacceptable
What are 3 aspects of a "reasonable" regulation that government might variety to control assembly
Explain the "Content neutral" rule that government must follow.
Explain: the "Right of Association"
Explain the Courts edict in the boys scout defence
Answers: Your question is much of a syllabus afterwards a query. You may refer to the site below to gain all your query
www.manupatra.com
www.vakilno1.com
www.legalpundits.com
www.westlaw.com
Who would have thought that contained by the United States of America in 2007 we would be debating the merits of torture
Answers: Who would of thought that contained by 2007 the citizens of the United States would have be subjected to being blown up next to air planes, have to watch living human beings be be-headed, own to listen to taped messages from terrorists, unfolding us that more is to come? Who would of thought all of that???
Merits of torture.and you can quote me on this: "Why should I support what happens to a TERRORIST that would with a smile kill an American child basically because he can?"
And whoever memtioned the G. Convention, The United States signed that with other COUNTRIES. At no time or any place hold we ever signed ANYTHING PROTECTING TERRIORISTS. And if 'torturing a terrorist' results in ONE American go being save, then by adjectives means please torture away. I'll purloin a American or any human life OVER a terrorists rights or even a terrorists vivacity..
EDIT TO MONTEE IN REPLY TO EMAIL YOU SENT TO ME: You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine. I hope that your vent towards me have made you feel better. I deduce that people resembling you need to vent to perceive better about your wishy-washy, gutless attitude towards torrorists. You want others; like military member of different nations, to stand and exchange blows for your right to state your opinion, because you are only just to 'against' taking action for yourself. You do enjoy my pity.
there is no such debate. we abhor torture. the interview is if 30 seconds of stress where on earth no permanent or conditional harm or aching is inflicted can be considered the same as boiling contained by oil or skinning alive.
we do allow ourselves to stress prisoners. one example is by imprisoning them. its not nice, but its not torture.
plus it prevents empire from being lit alight and forced to jump from sky scrapers. contained by this way hose down boarding is a way to stress one being to prevent the genuine torture of thousands.
Still believe everything you see, hear, or read surrounded by the media, huh?
I'd approaching to personally draw together the man or woman who wouldn't torture or at least condone the torture of someone who might possess the tiniest bit of information which might abet to prevent another 9-1-1 or worse. I'd spit in your obverse!
Here's a flash for all you bleeding heart, pie-in-the-sky folks living up near in the rarefied stockade of the Big Chocolate Candy Mountain -- we have a bullseye painted on us by a few million subhumans who really do believe that they'd dance to Paradise if they tortured and then slaughtered your wife, your mother, your children, you. My counsel to you all is to return to veracity, if you've ever actually be anywhere near it contained by the first place.
Can he really sue me for moving out??
I moved into an apartment with three guys. BIG mistake (I'm a girl). One of the guys is enormously irresponsible, immature, loud, inconsiderate, never cleans up after himself and dialogue crap about everyone he know. And his excuse for how he acts is, "that's only who I am, I know I'm an a$$hole"But anyways, he was other putting me down, making fun of me, telling me everything he think is wrong with me, and freshly recently he said he "have some friends he can get to destroy me"
Well, I decided I've have enough of him. So, I brimful all my things and I moved out of the apartment the subsequent day. So here's my interview:
My name wasn't on the lease (because I'm 20yrs.old). I never signed any papers in the order of anything for the apt. Can this guy sue me because I wont pay the remaining of what the lease is? I'm going to remuneration the rest of Decembers rent, but I'm not paying up until April, because my name isnt on the lease and I'm not living here anymore.
So, can he really sue me for that???
Answers: As long as your name is not on the lease he can't do anything, surrounded by order for him to do anything, is if you vandalize and he had proof it be you. In fact you could win him for harrassment, and get alot more out of him, but no he can't sue you for that, he can try but he will not win, he is purely trying to scare you into giving him the money
To a unquestionable extent it depends on the laws of your state near respect to renters rights. Different states may have different law.
However, generally speaking, if you're dub isn't on the lease and you never signed any type of paperwork then you cannot be officially held responsible. Apparently in appendix to being an anal cavity this guy is stupid as all right.
Anyone can sue anyone. But I don't think he would prevail within his suit. With his verbal threats, you should consider file criminal charges against him. However, you his threat was not an outright threat, so it would not promising end up surrounded by criminal court.
In regards to the rent issue, I devise you had no substitute but to move out. You could even argue that his conduct resulted in him constructively evicting you and request damages for moving expenses, etc. Don't be afraid to struggle it out in court, as you would potential win if you play your cards right and tell the truth. It would be willing if you have witnesses.
What are those popular words???? Deny, Deny, Deny. Your name is NOT on lease,,,,deny, deny, deny, any other type of agreement..
Is death by noxious injection a cruel and unusual punishment?
If murder is such a serious crime then why does the state do it?Answers: i regard as the same article
u know that the us is up there near iraq, pakistan, iran and other troubled middle eastern countries in the peak amount of executions
keeping good company, aren't we?
I focus capital punishment is wrong..I reflect on if you kill someone you should hold to stay in send to prison until you die.
To me that's worse than dying.
Its stupid yeah! Why spend hundreds of dollars on poison when a damn machete would do the job freshly fine.
And what the hell is all that in the order of putting alcohol on the needle! So you bring an infecton big effing deal your gonna be limp in 5 minutes who care if you get rather rash.
Your gonna die any way!
I imagine being chopped up into pieces contained by an industrial shredder with your family circle watching (like Saddam use to do to people) is cruel and unusual. Or any of the crazy things the Brits use to do, like drawing and quarter.
Being put to sleep doesn't seem too cruel, I've have several needles in days gone by few years, and they hardly hurt at adjectives. As for being unusual, it seem to be the favored and most common (usual) form of wealth punishment so not unusual at all.
No. Lethal injection is not cruel or unusual, conspicuously since it is used so sparingly. The state does not commit murder since the individual who is being kill is losing his/her life as a consequence for committing a horrible crime. The conduct yourself is neither arbitrary nor capricious. They have have a chance to appeal, the appeals own failed, presently they have their sentence imposed.
Maybe they should hold considered the consequence before committing the crime.
i contemplate you are missing the point.
its not 'cruel and unusual' if you contend that you are merely requesting the state to find a more 'humane' method of execution.
its the RIGHT of a state to execute that is the grill. Is there ANY point at adjectives to doing so? Is it ETHICAL?
I totally disagree with the annihilation penalty...did you know it costs apx $72,000pa to save an inmate on death row and $40,000 within general population.
As to demise penalty, who give ANYONR the right to take another natural life...life incarceration without parole..tough labour..because ethnic group forfeit their human rights when they take a natural life
I do not think it is I have it in mind your killing them what does it event how it is done. and the sate does it (if it must) to set an example what do you think would start if murderers who have kill lots of innocent people get off near just a slap on the wrist? every one would start to do it I denote you would only bring back a slap on the wrist why not kill your mingy boss. That is how the world will think immediately if someone gets kill for murder then you will consider twice about doing murder. So the state make examples out of others so we do not cross the line.
Does anyone know what the following california motor vehicle code violations imply?
Answers: I might be able to help out you if you add to your cross-question and post the violations you are conversation about.
You own to give a citation or actual despoliation code to get an answer.
More Questions and Answers:
[1589] - [678] - [165] - [2464] - [149] - [972] - [2046] - [2290] - [1494] - [163] - [968] - [1507] - [1918] - [227] - [1677] - [1400] - [2394] - [1030] - [345] - [691]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: