Law Questions and Answers
I used to work for a company and they still owe me $2000. On 09/20/07 they gave me a check for the the total?
amount, near was no cover for the checks.What should I do beside the chcks and what if the "stoped payment" on it?
Please help!!!!
Thank you.
Answers: No cover? What?
What should you do beside the checks? - I would deposit them in my checking picture.
If they place a stop payment on them I would sue them.
I would nickname the company. Even though you're not an employee here... you are still entitled to the money you earned.
If its a small company...ask to speak to your mature supervisor/boss. If it's a bigger company... call the accounting department.
Good luck.
Happy holidays.
What do you penny-pinching by "no cover" there wasn't plenty money in the wall to cover the check?
If they wrote you a bad check you can sue them. If they owed you money, give you a check and then stopped it, you can sue them.
Was the money for wages (which would include things resembling commission, earned time off, etc) because if it was and they compensated you late afterwards, depending on State law, you may be entitled to penalty.
Richard
College: Attend on day of celebration?
Is the team leader of a college allowed by law to read out the following or is the law man broken and violated against ones human rights and under equality law:"Many people from your confidence attend college on your day of celebration, you should attend an not pilfer a day bad, as you will miss education."
This is lower than British Law.
I wonder if the college head broke any canon.
Your help beside refernce will be appreciated
Answers: The head of college concerned does not appear to be prohibiting bunking off, as the law permit the authorisation of a pupil's absence if he is taken out of university on a day exclusively set apart for religious observance by the religious body to which his parent belongs. It is not clear whether this is a college of highly developed education or a college. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/schoolattendance/...
As this is the position under the Education Act, it sounds as though this be kindly suggestion and a hint that this be not a festival for which it be customary for students of this particular conviction to take time past its sell-by date and fall at the back with their childhood. It is always permitted by regulation for the head of a instruction establishment to offer liberally advice.
Don't be ridiculous.
He's giving you guidance - "you should attend an not take a year off, as you will miss lessons."
If you choose not to take his suggestion, then stay away and miss the daylight of education. It's entirely up to you. Depends what you regard is more important - the celebration or the sunshine of classes.
How can giving you advice POSSIBLY be against any canon or a violation of your human rights? The interview is stupid.
Richard
Whats your best argument for or against the death cost?
Answers: To me it would depend on if it really was a determent or if its a short time ago being used to clear up space contained by the prison system. Is it more humane to kill someone or hold them in a cell for the rest of within life.
1. The destruction penalty is a deterrent to one
2. Why should society support a convicted hired gun for years and years and years
3. Some crimes are so heinous they justify the disappearance penalty
its successful 100% of the time
A dead man can not snuff again
You don't have to sympathize beside criminals or want them to avoid a terrible punishment to ask if the passing penalty prevents or even reduce crime and to think in the region of the risks of executing innocent people. Your cross-question is much too important to settle on the principle of sound bites.
125 relatives on death rows enjoy been released beside proof that they were wrongfully convicted. DNA is available surrounded by less than 10% of adjectives homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent people.
The demise penalty doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the passing penalty to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The demise penalty is neither. Homicide rates are superior in states and regions that enjoy it than in those that don’t.
We own a good alternative. Life minus parole is now on files in 48 states. It way what it says. It is sure and swift and from time to time appealed. Life without parole is smaller amount expensive than the death cost.
The death cost costs much more than life surrounded by prison, mostly because of the legal process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent relatives.
The death cost isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants with the worst lawyer. It doesn't apply to people beside money. When is the last time a affluent person be on death row, consent to alone executed?
The death cost doesn't necessarily help family of murder victims. Murder victim kith and kin members across the country argue that the drawn-out disappearance penalty process is tight for them and that life in need parole is an appropriate alternative.
Problems with speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent ethnic group released from death row have already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent person.
I am Pro-death Penalty. This is an essay I wrote which debunk the MYTH that the death cost cost too much money to be practical.. Enjoy!
One of the most seemingly persuasive arguments against the death cost in the United States is the notion that it is far more expensive to taxpayers for the Criminal Justice System to execute a condemned criminal than it would be for one and the same individual to serve a sentence of life in need parole. According to Studentabolition.org, a prominent anti-death penalty website, it is stated, “A annihilation penalty satchel costs an average of $2.3 million, about three times the cost of imprisoning someone surrounded by a single cell at the highest indemnity level for 40 years.” I will embezzle this information, couple it with superfluous statistics, and explain exactly why this is incorrect.
First, let us look at the $2.3 million numeral. This figure originate from an anti-death penalty article printed within the March 8, 1992 edition of the Dallas Morning News entitled, “Executions Cost Millions.” The article cited that most of the costs incurred in a departure penalty crust were base on the trial and sentencing hearings. I concur beside the cost analysis for the moment and believe it to be a fair representation of the actual cost of a passing penalty crust.
Now, we will look at the cost of life short parole. Again, Studentabolition.org states that the cost of imposing the annihilation penalty is, “…three times the cost of imprisoning someone within a single cell at the highest financial guarantee level for 40 years.” We must look sensibly at this. The author of this article means for his reader to infer that a life lacking parole case costs just $766,666.66; which is one third the cost of a case where on earth the death cost is a possibility. The $2.3 million figure accounts for adjectives aspects of a death cost case according to the Dallas Morning News article, however Studentabolition.org accounts ONLY for the cost of internment of the individual who receives a sentence of go without parole. Manipulation of numbers is how the anti-death cost movement has fabricated the cost claim against Capital Punishment. So, let’s try to find a feel for what the indisputable numbers should look like.
We call for to consider the costs of the trial and appeals in both disappearance penalty and life span without parole cases. The Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC), another anti-death cost organization, have concluded that the costs of trials and appeals for death cost cases is twenty-one times that of a life surrounded by prison without parole defence. Although some estimates are much higher, let’s simply say that a equal estimate of the cost for the trial and appeals for an individual being sentenced to energy without parole is $70,000. According to DPIC, this would mingy that the same suitcase, if brought to trial for the death cost, would cost $1.47 million. I will give the DPIC the benefit of the doubt and keep hold of these numbers.
Cost so far:
Life Without Parole: $70,000 vs. Death Penalty: $1,470,000
We now call for to take into consideration the cost of captivity for both death cost and life lacking parole cases. Looking back at the Studentabolition.org estimates for the cost of detention over 40 years, we find that $766,666.66 divided by 40 equals $19,166.65. This indicates that the cost of incarcerating one person sentenced to natural life without parole is simply $19,166.65. This figure is wrong when compared to the actual costs of incarceration. For Fiscal Year 2001, the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that on average, it costs $27,025 per year to incarcerate one inmate ($22,650.00/yr for facility operations plus $4,375/yr medical guardianship, food service, and utilities). This is up from a little over $20,000 surrounded by the Bureau’s Fiscal Year 1996 report.
Before we factor this amount into the total costs of the death cost and life lacking parole, we must address another flaw that Studentabolition.org has beside its figures. The cost of detention will not remain the same every year over a forty year time. We must take into depiction economic inflation, rising healthcare costs, rising preservation and construction costs, etc. For this reason, the Bureau of Justice Statistics surrounded by the same survey cited above, detailed that the cost of internment rises by an average of 3% year-to-year. Also, another problem exists with using the numeral of $27,025 in that this number represents the AVERAGE cost calculated next to all inmates surrounded by consideration. We must remember however that the AVERAGE inmate is not serving a sentence of life in need parole. The largest populations of inmates serving life sentences for revolutionary crimes, which are comparable to death cost cases, are in maximum indemnity prisons and therefore incur a cost much sophisticated than $27,025. Since that data is out of stock to me however, we will use the said figure. Likewise, I will do indistinguishable in calculating the cost of incarceration on departure row.
To calculate the cost of enthusiasm without parole, we run $27,025; multiply it by 40 years and factor in an increase of 3% respectively year. This yields that the cost to incarcerate one inmate serving a sentence of vivacity without parole amounts to $2,187,007.19. We can presently compare this to the amount required to incarcerate a death row inmate. Antideathpenalty.org presents the statistic that the average time an inmate spends on annihilation row is eleven years. So again, in command to give the anti-death cost authors the benefit of the doubt, I will use that information. Now, we will take $27,025; multiply it by 11 years and factor contained by an increase of 3% each year, which yield an amount of $393,923.52.
Total cost of trial, appeals, and incarceration:
Life Without Parole: $ 2,257,007.19 vs. Death Penalty: $1,863,923.52
I find it to be interesting how different the numbers are when both sides of the argument are held to the same standards. Actually, I surface that I have be very handsome to the abolitionist argument as I have neglected to try to reason for the many obscured additional costs of incarceration. Think roughly speaking the increase in population of inmates next to Hepatitis C, HIV, and AIDS who will require additional, more expensive medical trouble. What about geriatric fastidiousness of inmates as they reach the terminate of their lives (and prison terms)? These factors and others enjoy the potential to add substantial amounts of money to the already dignified cost of life short parole.
The truth is, a comprehensive study on the costs of the death cost versus the cost of life short parole has never be completed and I am not attempting to pass my number-crunch rotten as such. My purpose however was to prove that the anti-death cost movement’s claim that capital punishment comes near a higher price label is shaky at best and to give an example showing why, when dealing beside politics, things aren’t always as they seem to be. The attempt to provide false information and to manipulate statistics contained by order to inflict changes within policy should be discrediting to the authors of the articles I have referenced The reality that such measures were even taken should own people interrogate the validity of any other arguments other member of similar organizations own made.
How do you make money efficiently with an expired drivers license?
Answers: Real duty close to the bus line
deal in it to an illegal
You be the lawyer: Is this a silly lawsuit and a authentic waste of taxpayer money and resources?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071215/ap_o...This is wasting the court's time, the judge's time, everyone's time.
Answers: i agree, it's a bunch of rotten baloney if i've ever see it. i'm studying the Constitution right now, and at hand isn't anything in near that even IMPLIES that "ladies night" is illegal. If that be the case, restaurants by the thousands would be sued because they own early birds, free kids meal at certain times, and celebrity discounts.
hell, movie theaters would be out of business then, and so would school (free lunches based on pay envelope. the mindset here says nation can sue schools because they're categorize based on salary).
I agree. These sorts of suits taking "equal rights" to ridiculous extremes should - contained by my ever so humble opinion - result contained by the filing legal representative being sanctioned.
Richard
to be precise so stupid!
they guy is gonna lose and go into debt and look similar to a complete idiot to the world.
unfortunately, everyone is trying to win rich now adays by sueing eachother. its worrisome! seriously, im afraid to do anything because i might get sued!
It *is* is a weighty cross-examine:
Our laws and public policy prohibit providing same services at different prices base on gender, see, religion, national origin, etc. We call for that "discrimination". Everyone knows that much.
This satchel is about if restaurants and bar are allowed to have an exception to that rule.
On the obverse of it, it is not clear why they should when no one else is allowed to.
But that is to say what the court is there to clarify, and nearby is value surrounded by due process.
I believe there enjoy been similar suits in connection with gender related pricing at dry cleaners - contained by that case the decide factor was that womens clothing is constructed differently and requires different handling and diligence, and hence the service is not the same.
Expect the bar to make a similar argument, that somehow the service contained by providing drinks is not the same for men and women, no thing how tortured an argument that is.
And expect them to lose unsuccessfully making that argument, or making the argument that they need to do it for "marketing purposes". that may or may not be true, but it is contrary to public policy, and any business would want to pilfer advantage of such discriminatory opportunity if they could.
Expect the ladies to be paying the same price as the guys pretty soon.
And here is marketing solution, since I am a marketing guy:
Sell little chits to men and women - read aloud blue to people who want guys to recompense less for a drink, and red for citizens who want ladies to pay smaller amount.
Sell them fro $1 (or whatever the souk bears). Collect the chips behind the counter.
Then at the designated time, adjectives drinks to the designated group are discounted as one chit is applied to each drink purchased until none are disappeared.
If the guys at the bar want to attract the ladies, they will foot in finance for their drinks to be cheaper, and the ladies will show up for the cheap drinks, just as presently.
Yet this program is gender indistinct :)
Ticket for crashing into a tree, case dismissed?
i crashed into a tree while it be raining, i was going 45mph on a 55mph road, i guess i hydroplaned, the ticket states that i be driving at an "unreasonable speed" everyone is telling me my overnight case will get dismissed but i stipulation to hear it from a lawyer or a police officer, so will it go and get dismissed? should i get a attorney?Answers: you were without a doubt driving at an unsafe speed
the speed "limit" only is how hastily you can safely walk in model conditions
you got the ticket probably becuase you hurt someone, you should be made to discharge for the bill
forget the lawyer surrounded by this one, not worth the money
plead not guilty to the ticket, when you get to court nearby will probably be an assistant DA there that will site you down and consent to you plead guilty to a lesser misdemeanour
plead guilty to that, pay the fine and be cheerful youre not in detain
If your speed was a factor contained by your accident after they probably won't let be in motion of the "unreasonable speed" - the posted speed limit is the speed confine in apt, normal conditions. With wet on the road you do inevitability to go slower.
right luck though.
I just required to say how stupid it is that they make available a ticket to someone for getting into an accident. It's not close to you wanted to obtain in an misfortune!
If you hydroplaned, you should sue the municipality for not having proper draining doing a tour. Go check to see if there are storm sewers and if they are clogged by leaves.
As to your press, I have prearranged people who enjoy gotten ticket for things like that. They didn't carry their case dismissed and have to pay a fine. It sucks.
Just because you be under the speed constrict does not mean that you be not travelling at an unreasonably high speed. I run into this situation frequently beside newly-licensed drivers who think that the posted speed constrict is a license to drive at that speed. The judge will call for to decide whether you requirement to have your license lift. One way to ensure that you lose your license is to approach this near the attitude that your speed could not have be unreasonable because you were driving lower than the speed limit. You entail to convince the judge that you really and truly do twig that you have to drive at a restrained speed based on adjectives the circumstances, including weather, time of day, and your own fitness to drive.
It's impossible enough that presently, your auto insurance will become prohibitively expensive. You just thought it be ridiculously expensive before presently. After this accident, even if the ticket is dismissed, your owner will non-renew you, putting you into the assigned risk pool, which means you're looking at anywhere from 500% to 3000% increase within the premium for liability coverage. Lots of judges will pretty much automatically convict on this reality pattern, which within many states routine that the license is revoked and you will have to dance through the written and road tests again after your 18th birthday. In some states, you will be adjectives from taking the test and getting a license for at lowest a full year.
It might not be a bad theory to get a attorney so you can develop a negotiated plea and possibly keep your license.
It's impossible to answer in need knowing the laws of your state and town. However, plea bargain is pretty common for minor traffic offenses.
It won't rework the amount of money you pay for the ticket, but you can usually gain the number of points reduced, which will make a difference on your insurance rates. Normally, it's pretty much an assembly flash operation where purely about everyone get their points reduced without the aid of attorney.
If you were going 10 mph beneath the speed limit, it might be possible to capture the ticket dismissed completely, but it would be hard for you to win that suitcase on your own - hydroplaning is a strong indication that your speed was too hurriedly for conditions. A lawyer might enjoy enough experience to return with the case dismissed, which would amass you money on your insurance, but you'd probably be paying the lawyer as much as the fine you're getting out of.
About how much does it cost to file for a power of attorney?
Answers: Varies from state to state and by the number of page in some states; nickname the local clerk's office or check the county website.
bowdlerize; YOU CAN'T GET A POA FROM A DEAD PERSON. YOU NEED TO CONTACT THE PROBATE COURT IN THE COUNTY THEY DIED IN TO HAVE AN ADMINISTRATOR APPOINTED FOR AN INTESTATE ESTATE IF THEY DID NOT LEAVE A WILL>
Depends on what you are really asking--there are different kinds.
General POA--get a form from organization supply store & fill contained by the blanks. Cost of form & notary.
Durable POA--Still get a form.
For life span and feeding decision. Get them free at the local hospital business office.
Guardianship. File a suit. Whatever the local file fees are.
There are other types.
Nothing. You can write one out on a piece of notepaper.
Want to make it 'pretty'? Download one for free from adjectives over the internet.
Under 'some' circumstances the person that the holder of the POA is asking to adopt it might ask for it to be notarized. My local notary charges $10 for that. (I'd like to see where on earth the first poster gets things notarized for a buck! )
Richard
A good website that let me know what are taxes spent on or how much taxes are used for the death cost?
Answers: I have several. The actual numbers rise and fall from state to state but the bottom line is impossible to tell apart: The cost of the death cost is much greater than the cost of life contained by prison.
1. Final Report of the Death Penalty Subcommittee of the Committee on Public Defense, Washington State Bar Association, December 2006,
http://www.wsba.org/lawyers/groups/commi...
2. New Jersey Public Policy Perspective, Mary Forsberg
http://www.njadp.org/forms/cost/Moneyfor...
3. The Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury Office of Research's Report, "Tennessee's Death Penalty: Costs and Consequences."
http://www.comptroller.state.tn.us/orea/...
4. Kansas: Performance Audit Report: Costs Incurred for Death Penalty Cases: A K-GOAL Audit of the Department of Corrections
5. National Bureau of Economic Research, The Budgetary Repercussions of Capital Convictions, by Katherine Baicker
http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8382
6. Indiana Criminal Law Study Commission, January 10, 2002)
7. Costs of Processing Murder Cases in North Carolina,
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/northcar...
How many ethnic group here on Y/A are involved in a judicial thing? Past and present?
I myself are on probation till may 08 for drunk driving.So I'm not looking to put people down,I can do a dutiful job at that by myself.Answers: I sued someone contained by small claims court in 2000; he settled out of court. I lawfully changed my surname in 1999.
Technically, I be involved in "judicial matters" for almost 4 years when I worked surrounded by a probation/parole department.
Do you approve of death cost being vetoed in NJ?
It should be noted, that surrounded by several recent cases of Virginia, Texas, etc etc it was found by DNA evidence that innocent ancestors were sentenced to demise.Even if 1 innocent person have the potential to be put on death row, consequently the whole extermination penalty desires to be abolished.
so it be right thing to do by exclusion death cost?
Answers: I agree with you. New Jersey did the right article and in the right path. It instituted a year long study commission before taking up an abolition bill. Among the masses witnesses before the commission be families of murder victims who do not support the loss penalty. I hold given a link to the commission report, below.
You don't enjoy to sympathize with criminals or want them to avoid a unforgivable punishment to ask if the death cost prevents or even reduces crime and to reflect about the risks of executing innocent nation. Your question is much too celebrated to settle without thinking roughly speaking these.
125 people on release rows have be released with proof that they be wrongfully convicted. DNA is available in smaller amount than 10% of all homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent relatives.
The death cost doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the death cost to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The death cost is neither. Homicide rates are higher surrounded by states and regions that have it than surrounded by those that don’t.
We have a correct alternative. Life without parole is immediately on the books within 48 states. It means what it say. It is sure and swift and rarely appealed. Life in need parole is less expensive than the disappearance penalty.
The destruction penalty costs much more than go in prison, mostly because of the official process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent people.
The annihilation penalty isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants next to the worst lawyers. It doesn't apply to relations with money. When is the final time a wealthy being was on passing row, let alone executed?
The loss penalty doesn't necessarily lend a hand families of murder victims. Murder object family member across the country argue that the drawn-out death cost process is painful for them and that life span without parole is an appropriate alternative.
Problems near speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent people released from extermination row had already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent human being.
Yes. The death cost does not accomplish the stated objectives.
It is not a deterrent to crime. Murder rates are lower in states that do not hold the death cost.
It costs more.
It is not fairly applied.
See http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/FactShee...
yes, but inopportunely it would be more effective if adjectives states would an it..
More Questions and Answers:
[445] - [2513] - [1121] - [194] - [1785] - [2567] - [331] - [343] - [1125] - [1269] - [2135] - [1826] - [551] - [1390] - [1494] - [2129] - [1604] - [2369] - [999] - [2491]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: