Law Questions and Answers

Once again killers win. New Jersey ban death cost. Are those who care more for the rights of killer ->

than the victims they kill chirpy now? Are those who to some extent defend those who rape & slay innocent children than the children they victimize happy that they spared killer from getting what they deserve? I hope that one day you never be in motion through the pain & suffering of have your child raped killed & next told that the killer will be spared b/c they are those who attention more for the rights of killers than the victims.
Answers: I believe this post isn't roughly speaking voting Democrat, being a liberal or the "innocent" prisoners put to annihilation. Granted mistakes have be made. However the truth is the laws today protect the criminal more than they do the innocent. That is member of the point of this post. For the argument that nobody has the right to choose if a personage should be put to death.what are you thinking in the region of the person or population a killer have killed??? Sounds to me as though you conjecture that's alright. Yes it is a waste of taxpayers money to hang on to them in prison. Change the law. Put a time limit on their appeals, there's a foundation a jury found them guilty. It may not be morally right to put them to death, but that's not the point. They snuff out, go to lock up knowing they will stay there forever. It's close to slapping them on the wrist . What kind of message does that distribute? How many times do you hear roughly someone getting out of prison & turning around & killing again?? I am not a "bleeding heart" but I will speak that I believe in an eye for eye. You dance around killing populace, you die ...simple as that. I have without doubt no sympathy for somebody that killed a soul or persons. You don't close to the lethal injection because it's painfull??? How do you give attention to a person that be stabbed or beaten to disappearance felt? I find it knotty to believe they felt no throbbing.
This will not be the answer you want but here goes. What happen is this. The bleeding hearts say aloud the victim is insensible so they have no rights, but the living still hold rights. Twisted? You bet, but I heard that from an attorney.
Now the rest of the problem is this. The bleeding heart marched, protested, pleaded, petitioned. You are for the annihilation penalty, did you do any of the above. No, resembling the rest of us, you complained on the Yahoo. Not really much of a forum.
So unless you are willing to do something beside write question here the whole situation is irrelevant to you.

A small PS. I cannot say, for faultless that the death cost is right or not. I just know this, Timothy McVey will never again slaughter babies in a nursery. Look it SoapBox, next act tough on the internet.
what would Jesus do ?
fry them surrounded by the electric chair ?

gratitude for sharing your Christmas thoughts.
Great, now we gain to foot the bill for all the idiots who will NOW lone get a LIFE sentence for something they probably deserve to die for. I don't attention to detail about you liberal idiots who influence we don't have the right to pinch a life. Well later who gives the MURDERER the right to waste someone? Eye for an eye I say. Let the punishment fit the crime.

Hey Soap Box, burn any American flags lately?? Or do you simply use them to wipe your butt with??
I guess the one and only good that can come out of outlawing the death cost is that the wrongly accused and innocence will not be kill for someone else's crime by mistake. However, how often does that surface in murder cases? I dunno. Hopefully not closely.

I agree with you though. It is a surplus of tax payers money too for them to stay alive. End them close to they have finished another life (Or lives).
I surface the death cost is a waste of taxpayer's money. All the money spent on special cell, prison areas, legal appeals, court appointed attornies for mandate appeals - I'd rather lately lock them up and throw away the key.

I can hear your strain through your post, and I understand how hurting and angry you are - but the release penalty won't bring you peace, and it won't punish the perp as much as living contained by the terror of the standard prison population as a known child molester.
Sounds approaching you are in profoundly of pain! Has this happen in your ethnic group? If it has, I'm truely sorry.

I know I will receive a lot of boo's, but here go!

To answer your question, I believe contained by the death cost. I think the punishment should fit the crime. Please read, I know that there are innocent race sometimes convicted. I have no problem near an appeal. But these who are sitting on death row doing appeal after appeal, capably there's no since in this. Give them two appeals, afterwards off to the bench or lethal injection. If we would execute adjectives those on death row, and show the criminals what will come up to them if they kill, afterwards maybe our crime rate would travel down.
It should be up to the immediate family to decide on the execution.
And as for the SOAPBOX PREACHER "show some mercy" Where be the mercy for the child that was kill & raped??
You are the fool that makes these monsters grow bigger & bigger respectively day. Killing them does not bring them put money on but its relief for the victims knowing that this sick monster is no longer on this earth.
Show mercy bequeath me a break!! Where do you live anyway DisneyWorld?
And your preaching are not going to rid this country of people similar to me because we believe in protecting the innocent & sprite for the victims!!! You are the one that needs soul probing my weak friend!!
Here are the facts around death cost. US is the ONLY industrialized country to have annihilation penalty. All other countries that enjoy death cost, besides US are third world countries.

Why US wants to sign up 3rd world company? Does it want to show that we are uncivilized?

Killing for massacre is not justice. Also record, that in several recent cases of Virginia, Texas, etc etc it be found by DNA evidence that innocent people be sentenced to death.

Even if 1 innocent personality has the potential to be put on destruction row, then the together death cost needs to be abolish.

you need to address this problem 1st until that time executing anyone.
is it a right to kill someone?

does it product it all better if we eliminate them

did you ever think they be abused by the culture and then react to that abuse

doesnt god control passing?

The TRUTH vs. The LIE... HOW CAN ONE KNOW THE DIFFERENCE?

Society has become so wringing with lies, that lies enjoy in some cases become pleasing as the truth. A historice figure once said, "To brand a lie believable, describe BIG lies". The bigger the lie the more gullable race are.

Lies, like goblin tells hold worked themselves into the fabric of everyday life span...Do we really care anymore if someone tell the truth or a lie?

Government officals lie back to the public so much and get away next to it, maybe prejury should be taken sour the books as a crime.

Is that the origin why they took the bible out of the courts...and the statue of justice wear a veil across her eyes?
Answers: I understand and agree near the points you've made about lying, and no problem accountability seems to be completely away.

To answer your original cross-question, however, people want to know how to research the facts. We have the internet very soon, so it's not like you enjoy to look through the library card catalog. If someone is told something and they don't know whether to believe it, they should go to their computer and look at a choice of sites, even from other countries and other parts of the political spectrum, and then analyze what they've read to achieve their own conclusion.

Most people will not filch the time to do this, sadly.
Lies head to error, confusion, bondage and eventually death. Truth lead to freedom, peace, understanding, and lavish life.

When general public don't know the answer, lies seem to be the truth. Then they tolerate evil. This is why invisible Satanic forces (and Satan is the father of lies) works complex to hide populace from the truth, to encourage resistance to and tear down of the truth. This includes promotion of taking the Bible out of the courts, eliminating prayer contained by schools, trying to pocket Christ out of Christmas, etc.

Where there is no mirage, people perish.

Since you mentioned the Bible, Jesus say I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life; no one comes to the Father except by (through) Me (John 14:6)."

Invite Jesus into your heart, and you'll know the Truth.
Yes.In the 1940's,more than 500,000 holocaust victims be added to the number,with no explanation.
The holocaust occured,but clearly be exaggerated.

State Constitution vs. United States Constitution?

Why do state Constitutions reflect change in popular concerns more readily than the United States Constitution?

The state Constitution is not as stable compared to the United States Constitution. Why is this?
Answers: Just took my state constitutional ruling final last week. So this is probably the ultimate chance I own to use this knowledge for the subsequent year and a half.
As stated above, state cons are much easier to amend than the feed con. States have adjectives types of methods of amending them, from the initiative to Delaware's ratification-by-two- consecutive-state-assemblies. (By the way, Delaware is the just state where the population do not directly vote on state con amendments.) In most states, some proportion of the state legislature must vote 'yea', afterwards the public votes on the amendment as well. State cons can be amended for a quantity of reasons, and sometimes it is in actual fact easier to amend the state con (for instance, by initiative) than it is to get a particular law passed.
State cons also can be amended within response to a judicial decision that the public is wretched with. Because state cons can be amended so (relatively) effortlessly, state courts tend to interpret them more strictly than the fed courts interpret the feed con; if the public is unhappy next to how a state con provision was interpreted, they can amend it. If the public is glum with how the feed con is interpreted, amending it is a long, and usually futile, process. Similarly, state courts tend to defer more to stare decisis (precedent), because the state con can be changed if the people are doleful.
State cons can grant rights above the 'federal floor'; for instance, while the federal con sets the standard for, voice, what is a legal dig out and seizure beneath the 4th amendment, a state con may grant more individual rights than the feed con; this way, a force out that might be legal below the fed con would be informal under the state con.
State cons can admit rights that are not even in feed cons. The most common of these rights is probably the right to an tuition.
State cons may deal beside state-specific issues. For instance, the Florida state con has a provision for the humane treatment of pigs. Does this really stipulation to be in the state con? Couldn't a statute work of late as well?
Anyway, I'm incoherent. In short, state cons are pretty cool, and useful for defending civil liberty cases.
Because the State Constitution affects fewer population, and legislation and/or amendments are easier to enact.
Additionally, an amendment to the United States Constitution must be ratified by three-quarters of any the state legislatures, or of constitutional conventions specially elected within each of the states, beforehand it can come into effect.
An amendment to a states constitution, can come via either a two-thirds vote of the population, or in some states by a three-fifths approval by both houses of the states legislature.

Do I have the right to sue within this situation?

I posted a video on youtube back on September 1st. The things i talk about surrounded by my video are now within a commercial that is individual played nationwide. Clearly they stole my thinking straight off of youtube. I enjoy all the evidence showing that it be my idea first.
Answers: You realize that once you put something on YouTube, you own voluntarily abandoned your permitted copyright protection, unless you explicity declare that you enjoy not done so.
If the people who made the commercial, or their classified ad agency claim that the idea be in nouns before September the 1st, consequently you've wasted your time and money.
Did you copy-write it?
If you did, yes! Sue the hell out of them!
If not, your SOL.
No you can't.
Books, documents, music, video can be copyrighted, Ideas can not.
You have the right to sue anyone, at anytime, for any justification. I doubt you'll win in this bag, but you can give it a shot.

Talk to YouTube, they've get instructions on their website that describe copyright infringement laws. However, they may also own a clause that gives implicit sanction for anyone to use the videos they host as a section of the Terms of Service agreement when you signed up for an account.

You may indeed hold all the evidence showing that it be your idea previously it was theirs. That channel absolutely NOTHING to a advocate or a judge.

You'll necessitate to prove that they came up beside these ideas BECAUSE of your video and that the two party did NOT come up with them separately. They will claim that it be a coincidence and that they had plans to shoot the commercial formerly your video posted; it's tough to prove otherwise, and I think you'd be wasting your time and money to pursue it.

But after I'm not a lawyer, confer to one and see what they say.
1) You can;'t copyright planning, only the actual expression within fixed form of them

2) Your video is copyrighted

3) You are unlikely to be the first to have have whatever impression it is you are talking roughly speaking, and copyright protection does not involve being first next to an idea contained by any case.

4) If you deliberate your copyright was violated, next take anything means are available to enforce it. see www.chillingeffects.org for definitive tips on how to do that.
By jump the gun and posting your video at YouTube.com before doing the concrete work of approaching commercial interests, you not only consented but INVITED worldwide people to access your material. By placing it contained by the PUBLIC DOMAIN, you lost the right to pursue those now profiting from your work. You've have a life lesson.

Oh, I suppose you might variety some trouble for whoever is using it IF you can show that the ideas presented commercially are THE EXACT SAME as yours within the video and that your video was published first and identified near you as the author. Because, as Shakespeare said, there are no different stories, the use of MERELY SIMILAR ideas will not create an undertaking in IP statute.

Pursue the matter with the sole purpose if you have a TON of money to retribution lawyers - IP inhabitants are $$$$ - and accept that you will probably settle up only to be told that your work is not sufficiently grounded surrounded by commerce, if you will, to support a claim. There is no sense paying $1/2 million in official fees for a loss valued at no more than $1,000 or some such negligible sum.

My sister has a great model for a toy does she need a copyright back she can...?

My sister has a great model for a celebrity doll, and she make her own "customized" dolls all the time that are deeply professional looking.
She wants to messages one out to this celebrity or to their company as a prototype. I'm worried that they will see it and bring her idea. Should she grasp a copyright or some form of legal work done earlier she mails a prototype?
Also, where on earth should she mail it to? The celebrity's managment company?
Any allowed advice would be great
Thanks
Answers: The answers here that articulate that a doll cannot receive copyright protection are absolutely incorrect. The Copyright Office specifically mentions dolls as a type of three-dimensional ocular work that is eligible for protection. The deposit requirements are timetabled in the intertwine below.

http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ40a.h...

Now, whether copyright or some other form of protection is appropriate for your case is really something not a soul can say here. To answer your cross-examine, you don't "need" anything, but certain things may be preferable depending on your specific covering.

Before you speak to anyone about your doll, you should speak to an attorney first. You may want a non-disclosure agreement, among other documents, beforehand you proceed. Further, using the likeness of a celebrity may present other issues that you necessitate to address beforehand as well.
First, a copyright is impossible for things, patents are. I am not sure that she have anything patentable as many family already make eminence dolls. She might be able to receive a patent if she created some fresh process.

If the doll is a physical likeness of a celebrity, she will promising need to rate the celebrity a license fee for the use of their likeness.
> Should she procure a copyright or some form of legal work done in the past she mails a prototype?

She requests a business plan instead of a dream. The answers on how to proceed will come from the planning process.

tip: Copyright will not be involved, but seeking legal suggestion certainly will be.

Under no circumstances should she e-mail out a prototype or even a description until the legal and business "t"s are crossed and the "i"s are dotted. There is no rush.

There are too oodles issues here for me to go into surrounded by more detail then that.

How do you make money at the double with an expired drivers license?

Answers: Get a mission you can walk to.
I didn't know an expired license could be profitable.

What is the difference between a writ and a warrent?

i have a debt next to child support. I want to pay but am out of order in the us , so not earn us pay. okay long strory short i have be told i have a writ out for me. i looked-for to know what i must do take watchfulness of this. i do not like to enjoy this type of problems. i am trying to take concern of this but only money can fix this. which i do not enjoy, the other question is does this with the sole purpose effect florida or all the us. as my mother desires to send me a plane ticket to call in. what are my options.
Answers: Well, you hold to take diligence of it.

Since you are outside the US, it is hard for anyone to attain you.

It is likely what you own been told is a "writ" is really a warrant.

Contact your ex's attorney, and see what he'll rob to have the warrant withdrawn, or enjoy your mother hire an attorney on your behalf.

** Note: This answer has not created an attorney-client relationship. This is a broad discussion of the subject matter of your interrogate and not legal guidance. Local laws or your expert situation may change the broad rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult permissible counsel with whom you can discuss adjectives the facts of your case. **

How to deal beside a collection agency representing a non-existent company?

Hi,

To make a long story short. A collection agency started to communicate next to me in November 2007 more or less an open be a foil for with a doctors organization back surrounded by November 2001. Since 2005 that doctors office company be bought by another one. All my doctors are still the same. I simply called my current doctors bureau and they are telling me that I do NOT hold any open stability.

So what do I do? Also, is it legal for a collection agency to claim a be a foil for due 6 years ago? The balance is for $180. I also contacted my insurance company and they can't run back on their collection at that date.

So currently, I have nought to prove... or do I ?

Thanks
Answers: As long as a debt is owed, a collection company has the right to attempt to collect the debt. As such, it is officially recognized for them to claim the balance. The public sale and purchase of the doctors office change nothing.

That person said, the debt may be beyond the statute of limitations for collections in your state. That does not denote that the debt is not owed (if it is valid) and it does not mean they can't attempt to collect the debt, it a moment ago means they can't sue you for the debt and they can not trimmings wages etc.

The first thing I would do is to taunt the validity of the debt.

Learn more give or take a few your rights here: http://www.fair-debt-collection.com/
Send the collection agency a letter (send it certified e-mail, return receipt requested) demanding proof of debt.

Then they enjoy to produce the paperwork proving that there is a debt.
Have received a little letters "referring me to collection" for non recompense or overdue medical bills.
Most of the time they were due to their own book keeping errors or tactless billing of insurance companies.
Very often near is no collection agency, just an feeble lady within the back who sends the junk mail out, hoping someone will "bite".
To make you be aware of better.
Got a letter from an "agency" demanding expense.
It was for something approaching $850 dollars & I knew I did not owe anyone that considerate of money or that anything was overdue.
The bill contained by question be be due to a misplaced decimal point.
I just tolerate them send me parcels until they had spent more on typing, copying & postage than the amount "owed" (actually .85 cents).
I sent them a copy of the bill I asked them for & pointed out the actual amount in recent times to rub it in.
It would hold cost them more to process the $,85 check than it was worth.
Go through your checkbook & find what you can.
Ask to hold the office dispatch you & the "collection agency "
stating there is no money owed.
Best regard

Has everyone who signed up for the lowesclassaction lawsuit received their settlement?

I received mine and was sooo disappointed. I worked for Lowes for 4 years as a specialist and received smaller number then $500.00 ! I worked tons of overtime. I would be terrifically interested to know what the overall settlement was and what other inhabitants received. I cannot believe this is what I was waiting for.
Answers: If you kept the paperwork, in attendance will be a listing for the class's attorney firm, probably next to an 800 number. You should call and ask what the settlement be, and how it was apportioned. They'll give an account you--they were your attorneys.

** Note: This answer have not created an attorney-client relationship. This is a general discussion of the subject concern of your question and not legitimate advice. Local law or your particular situation may money the general rules. For a specific answer to your cross-question you should consult legal counsel next to whom you can discuss all the facts of your bag. **

Legal problem please help.?

After my tenant forced her way into our house, and pushed my wife, later refused to disappear, we decided we no longer feel safe contained by this home. This was a friday darkness, we then granted that we would be out by monday, and we would pay them the amount ($33) for however masses days it took to leave. But monday be our set day. We told them this friday dark when she (the landlord) called to apologize. Monday as we be just finishing up cleaning the house, we be given the 3 day possession become aware of. Which obviously we be moved out anyway, so we weren’t goin to fight this. From my insight the 3 days would start on Tuesday, and end Thursday at midnight. (correct me if I am wrong) They didn’t telephone, or come to the house to see if we had already moved, they file papers with the court since the 3 days were up ( we are assuming the 2nd or possibly even 1st day of the 3 days), to bring the eviction process going legally. We be then served on Thursday (the 3rd day). I be a little confused because I thought that they have to legally dally until the fourth day to record the papers with the court ( because it also say on the papers they filed that the time on the interest had run out at that time they were file and it hadn’t), and that was if we refuse to move, which we didn’t, then serve us thereafter? If this is true, and they didn’t linger until the 4th day to record the papers, and even though we were already moved out of the house previously the 3 days were up, we be not given the 3 full days legally to establish if we were going to fix here complaint, or move. So now we are goin to eviction court when we weren’t even living in that for them to evict us. I am a little confused near that also. I have read some stuff, and everything so far say they have to get sure we get 3 days, consequently they can file papers, and if they don’t follow exact procedure, it can be voided. I a moment ago want some advice on this situation, because similar to I said we weren’t even living there when they file these papers and even still with the 3 days catch sight of, we were goin to donate them possession of the house back, but they didn’t continue for us to do so. We actually told them that Friday that we would be out by Monday, because we feel they violated our privacy and then sanctuary. And that we were refuse to rent from them anymore. Thank you, I appreciate any advice.
Answers: When a Colorado Tenant have Broken a Condition of the Lease

Before filing a suit to evict a tenant for noncompliance beside lease conditions, the landlord must post a written, signed emergency in a conspicuous place for confinement of possession of the premises. The notice must state the root the landlord believes the tenant is contained by violation of the lease and impart the tenant three days to either move out voluntarily or correct the defiance. (Noise violations are conspicuously difficult issues for both landlords and tenants on the subject of eviction.) After the written notice have been posted and if the tenant have not moved out by the end of the three days and have not corrected the violation, the hotelier may file an eviction suit at the local Justice Center. In computing the three morning notice the first hours of daylight is excluded. Therefore, the three day length begins the daylight following the posting. The start of the three day time define begins running whether or not the tenant discovers it posted. Also the time continues to run regardless of whether it is a Saturday, a Sunday or a holiday.

Hope this help
First, you need to influence what state you are in. Laws are different from place to place.

Second, the 3 afternoon notice be served on Monday and includes Monday in most jurisdiction. So the 3 days are Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, meaning they can sue on Thursday. But as I said, this depends on your state's extraordinary laws.

It would be worthwhile for you to clutch the papers to a landlord/tenant attorney for a complete explanation of your rights.

EDIT on your additional details - name a lawyer first entity Monday, you shouldn't have wait this long. But in your answer to the complaint, state 1) that you do not owe any money 2) that you did not breach the lease 3) that you be forced to move because of the landlord's breach of the lease 4) that the Notice was impolitely served on you, 5) that the time period contained by the Notice had not expired when the complaint be filed, and 6) that you surrendered possession on XXX date.

Then permit the judge sort it out.
Look at the date of the possession discern. If it's dated when you were already GONE, after their case merely lost 100% merit. Also look at the date when it was deliver to you, and if it's when you were already gone, you'll win surrounded by court. Since you got the possession identify on Monday when you were already gone, you're worthy. They can't sue a tenant when they've already beaten their own reposession deadline and have been living at a different place already.

More Questions and Answers:
[1688] - [2302] - [36] - [2186] - [1118] - [931] - [1294] - [207] - [2146] - [1265] - [2054] - [1787] - [2152] - [1271] - [834] - [1486] - [2519] - [1520] - [990] - [955]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: