Law Questions and Answers
Could the president go to detention centre if he/she breaks the law?
What if he or she committs a crime, they could confidently get themselves out of it since they are the president right? ionoAnswers: I can't see that scheduled. For instance, the truth about the Clintons is that they stole roughly speaking two hundred thousand dollars worth of furniture, paintings and the approaching from the White House. You and I paid for it. They be not questioned. Try that at your opportunity and see what happens!
ya.
everyone is equal when it comes to the court.
After they retire they can progress to jail.
It might be possible that they could run to jail, but it would be extremely unlikely. Look at the finishing 30-40 years!
They wont..they will just gain a slap on the hand and achieve impeached..Example..Watergate scandal
I am pretty sure that they can step to jail!
yes noone is exempt from the directive though they probably wont get much or any incarcerate time
sadly yes , but it depends on the crime
The president pretty much have to go to top-security prison after his / her term for screw up the country :)
100%
No matter what any president does, he will other have adequate money and powerful friends to keep out of send to prison.
If that's true then he should be surrounded by jail already.
You own NO idea how much power the Shriners own do you? The good ol boys transport care of their own!
yes they can and the first step to specifically impeachment
It depends where he or she come from
You call for to read up on the executive branch rights. If the Legislative or Justice branch brings the charges and they are upheld even the President can be incarcerated.
In some democratic countries like the USA it is possible. In shadows dictatorships he / she would send the opponent to jail. This is the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship.
yes. the regulation can force them out of presidency and then they can go and get sentenced to jail.
that never happen though.
Yes the President can go to sentence to prison if he/she breaks the law because the President is considered a civilian. If the president commits treason later that offense is punishable by death. Proving that the President have commited a crime is hard so you will probably not hear that a President have been arrested.
You don't see Bush surrounded by jail do you? Hes a master criminal ! No convicted felon have any rights. Impeach the vietnam dodging coward
well let see um WATERGATE, I dont remember nixon doin any time! i feel these gas prices are a crime and its adjectives because he only have 1 year left and he owns grease wells contained by texas so hes making as much as he can while hes in here , and the lovely usa gets to recompense him all that "manufacture me richer" money but of course noone cares- take what im drivin' at?
In theory, yes they could travel to jail. But it will never come to pass. It has other been a custom for the tentative president to give pardon .
Yea, they certainly can attain themselves out.
They are reach and can buy any best defense (that is if business went as far as court).
But I come up with that if they do commit crime - they should be on the same plate beside others and pay for the crime as others do.
But again if a President is chosen - nearby is a great deal of responsibility he/she will enjoy and if there be no corruption in elections - President will with ease not commit any crime.
Hey, that would be nice. But we all know that things come up.
The president cannot be prosecuted or go to sentence to prison while he remains in bureau. The House of Representatives must first vote to petition the senate to impeach the president. The Senate will hold a trial and determine if the President is guilty. If the Senate finds the president guilty, the president is removed from office, and criminal charges can next be filed surrounded by the federal court against the ex-president.
As soon as the president is removed, the vice-president becomes the unusual president. And usually, the new president will allow an official Pardon to the deposed president clearing him of any criminal charges or convictions.
This is what happen to Nixon in the Watergate affair. Look up on it.
Why not? No one should be above the imperative.
This maxim,however,does not apply to corrupt regemes, where on earth greed or power have precedence over equality.
You bet a President can go to lock up if he/she breaks the law.
But you can be sure a they will be exonerate before they even see the outside of sentence to prison.
The chances of that occurring would be rather small contained by the USA. Even Nixon got pardon, and Bush doesn't even get mentioned for mortal involved ratting out an undercover agent anymore. The crime would have to be earthshaking and massively very public, probably hold to catch him/her surrounded by front of multitudes of people and on show. He/she would also need to be impeach first or else simply out of department.
According to Article 2, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, a president is specifically forbidden from issuing pardons surrounded by cases of impeachment. Of course, a silly little detail like that didn't stop Ford from pardoning Nixon.
First they would be impeach and then the would bring back arrested.
If it were so, our Current Joke would be contained by jail already.
Is it legal to...?
brand name out with someone for moneydeal in your panties
give someone a handjob/finger them for money
I'm wondering where on earth the line is drawn between legally recognized and not legal sexual act for money? I know it's illegal to confer someone oral or have sex near them but what about other things?
Answers: selling your panties is permitted and quite frequent too.the rest is not
Performing sexual act for money is prostitution, and is illegal surrounded by all states except for a few counties contained by Nevada.
It would depend on your definition of "making out;" if genital contact is involved, it's prostitution.
You can sell your panties to whomever you please. Ick.
A 'handjob' is still sex surrounded by the eyes of the law, and if you do it surrounded by exchange for any "valuable consideration" next it's prostitution, and is illegal.
"Valuable consideration" is anything that have value to you - money, a shirt, food, concert tickets, anything.
Richard
I believe this is really Bill Clinton asking question on yahoo.
Got Fired from a job and they asked me to sign a form motto I quit.What do I do?
I just get fired from a job that i've be working at for about two years. They give me stupid reasons for firing me but none the smaller number they did. I just turned 21 years old-fashioned and have to be honest dont know much going on for the working field i.e. break pay etc. anyway the ppl at my charge asked me to sign some form saying I disappeared on my own which I didnt but told me to sign it if I didnt want problems and I did. Well turns out i'm being told they did that so they wouldnt enjoy to pay me for my two week leave pay they owe and other stuff. Is this true? Does anyone know if I can do anything? Thanks for your timeAnswers: Get a attorney! They can't force you to do that and I think they be being fairly presumptuous making you sign those papers. And the fact that you did it, didn't serve any, but defend your rights, girl. Don't stand near and take it!
you entail to get some endorsed advice ethier from a solicitor or from citizens direction bureau,because they cannot sack you, then ask you to sign a form stating something different.
ask somebody who works for a alliance they should be able to recommend you further in claiming what you are owed
Call or pop in the unemployment bureau apply & report them..never sign anything u don't understand especially if it's not true..u can also report them to the BBB
revise ur rights and use them to the fullest!!!!
Not only that, but if you "quit" you are unable to unemployment compensation that you might otherwise bring back. Since your former employer would have to payment part of that compensation, they'd free money if you say you quit.
They also don't own to pay for job loss if you were to choose to collect it. You get duped, chalk it up to experience. Also, when you get fired, they enjoy to pay you what you are owed contained by wages when you walk out the door. If you quit, they go and get 72 hours to pay you. If you feel like it, you could possibly hire an attorney to argue you were pressured into signing. Or if you are a suitable bluffer, and know a few key court terms, you might know how to get them to pay packet you for your vacation time, etc. It would cost smaller number to pay you what you are owed, as compared to the cost they would enjoy to pay their lawyer to go to court.
Don't sign that newspaper. Then they can get out of you getting Unemployment. Go to the Labor board. Tell them what happen. You sound honest so don't agree to them get away near this.
NEVER SIGN A THING. IF YOU QUIT THERE IS NO UNEMPLOYMENT PAY.
Go to your department of Labor office and record a complaint. They will know if others have file the same type of complaint that near is something amiss. Good Luck and stand up for yourself.
Yeah, you may be entitled to unemployment compensation, break pay and other stuff if they fired you for read aloud lack of work (laid off). But if you voluntarily quit, you won't find that stuff. Also if they fired you for a good sense (late or something) you will be denied benefits. I have to sign a page acknowledge I'm terminated every year end of Nov (construction job), but it say under the principle: "Lack of work in your classification". I obtain unemployment adjectives winter. I'd get a attorney if something illegal is going on near with your firing. Not sure what loving of problems you / or they mean...if its something serious resembling life or feeler, you could tell the police or basically walk away and vacate it behind you. You're solitary 21, you'll have lots more job. ...its only money...you'll catch more.
Go to the Labor Relations Board in your city or county ( you find them contained by the phone book under United States Government) and profile a complaint. If you cannot find the phone number, call your town or city clerk's organization ( under County Government and ask for the number)
That document you signed prevents you from getting laying-off benefits. Go quickly and start a claim.
You are probably not the individual employee they treated close to that. Time to have their collective hand slapped!
Best wishes!
Don't sign. Take the paper they want you to sign and report them to the the Labor Board and show them the composition. They sure have alot to hide from view don't they?
No matter what, the considerable step is for you to contact the Labor Board. This former employee won't approaching getting a call from them. Even if you get fired you still have rights to protect yourself. Think of the dismissal you will lose if you sign that paper.
DO NOT SIGN IT.
If you "quit", you aren't entitled to remaining vacation salary, unemployment, etc. They manufacture you sign it so they can save money.
If you already signed it, straight away send surrounded by a letter stating that you revoke your signature because you did not become conscious what you were signing. It won't be binding, but it may relieve.
Sorry old buddy, you are up the creek. That piece of article makes a big difference surrounded by your separation and since you signed it without their forcing you to do so, you hold relinquished your separation pay. You could purloin the matter to a attorney but he would charge you a darned fortune to even get it into a court. Remember surrounded by the future NEVER sign anything given to you that even remotely get the employer off the hook. They want you out..consent to them pay you.
What are the rights of direct care providers when assaulted by full-size clients with retardation disabilities?
Answers: What are you gonna do, sue a mentally disabled soul? If a retarded individual hits, kicks, bites or throws something at you, next just show him who's boss and hit him right spinal column twice as hard. They're not rather as stupid as you think and can even be pretty manipulative if they see that you let them achieve their way. But even an animal doesn't mess beside somebody who fights spinal column.
You have matching right as anyone else.
You can use the minimum force necessary to protect yourself, no more.
Richard
"What are you gonna do, sue a mentally disabled being? If a retarded individual hits, kicks, bites or throws something at you, afterwards just show him who's boss and hit him right put a bet on twice as hard. They're not rather as stupid as you think and can even be fairly manipulative if they see that you let them find their way. But even an animal doesn't mess near somebody who fights hindmost."
* 1 hour ago
The above is some of the best advice ever offered on yahoo. Don't be a subject. No one is subject to crazy people, and for too long, nurses/caregivers hold been treated close to punching bags by manager of hospitals and faciilites. It is NOW a felony to assault a healthcare worker, and for too long it wasn't even an issue, primarily because of female workers in need the backbone to make it an issue.
Treat em' similar to a cop would treat em'. If they attack you, slam em' down, lock em' up, press charges. Screw the mental retardation aspect. Protect yourself. You have a right to stir home safe and nouns to your family and loved ones. You own a right to make a living lacking being attacked.
Damn, I revulsion my nursing co-workers. Stupid, pathetic women nurses.
My wife, an RN, works surrounded by a mental health ward. Whether the client (patient) is retarded or simply deranged make no difference. You were not hired to be a punching rucksack. You certainly may use force to protect yourself. The knob here is training. If you work for a company or some organization, they are required to submission you some training and guidance in handling patients who become assaultive. If you are a private nurse, working for a ancestral and taking care of some familial member, next you are stuck with finding your own training. The second switch is documentation. Every time this client of yours becomes discourteous, you need to write it down. Time, date, place, and quote the threats, obscenities, and anything physical action he took and what protective measures you have to employ. Go find yourself a book on Police Report Writing.
Los angeles having its own militia what do u reflect on?
should los angeles have its own militia? reckon about respectively naighborhood in los angeles have 2 or 3 militiamen with guns how much safe and sound would los angeles be? who would rob a naighborhood with civilian soldiers guarding them?how abundant gang members will be arrested gratefulness to soldiers dressed as civilians?
i mean COME ON! we cant simply trust the LAPD to take comfort of this for us this is our city too its time for us to take responsibility contained by securing our selves and our naighborhoods and not act approaching a bunch of scared babies waiting for the police to come and collect us.
with a cuple of thousand militiamen among us walking the streets wouldnt you have a feeling safer? knowing that theres always someone immediate ready to aprehend a burglar? or a gangster or to braek up fights?
Answers: The concept is viable but the problem is preventing the 'guards' from establishing directive and order inwardly the precepts of law.Without constraints you would enjoy sanctioned thugs on your streets..who or what would control them?
Never happen. Too lots burned out hippies in charge who still judge everything can be cured with a collective. Criminals have more protections surrounded by Los Angles than anywhere else in the country. How would you arm your Militia near your State's gun laws the route they are now?? You simply about can't even take a water pistol. . .
Would this be illegal?
If a entity is shoplifting at my place of business can I lock the doors so they can't set off til they give me the stuff rear legs or until the police arrive. I was told I'm not permitted to touch them and it's so frustrating that I can't do anything.Answers: I know what you mean and face a similar situation as a teenager but next to physical touching/grabbing that I was right and sick of. I locked the door and called the police. He hightailed it out the posterior door and I never saw him again. Good riddance.
I think you can lock the door. I would.
stifle: I never had to finish the call upon to the police and never did tell my parents out of nervousness that they wouldn't believe me. I know now that they would hold, but views are different when see from teenage perspective.
You should ask this question of your local police. If they say-so don't touch them, don't touch them, and for your own safety I don't suggest locking them within with you.
Get a surveillance camera, and grasp 'em on tape. That means of access the police can bust 'em and get you spinal column your stuff, and also take them bad the streets for a little while. Video footage have been used surrounded by Texas to get robbery and even murder convictions., and a camera can even deter a crime.
Good luck.
It is a grey nouns, but unless you posted the rule plainly, probably you would be arrested for false imprisonment, and would lose your store to the shoplifter in compensation for detaining him/her against their will.
South Africa have a similar law; if a black man is robbing you and you detain him at it, even if he is arrested, he can complain and the police will let him dance, with his loot, and send down you for embarrassing him. He also consequently gets the subsequent 6 months of your entire income as a fine on you for his humiliation.
Friends of mine over there lost a year's remuneration completely on two break-ins.
Our laws are moving contained by that direction, not as far, but it is well set if you shoot a guy invading your house, be sure you kill him up to that time he gets outside, or the statute is on his side and you can be punished.
I would check with a GOOD advocate before doing anything more than calling the police and file a report, which probably will do you little good unless you own connections.
It is frustrating that the evildoers have adjectives the rights anymore, but that comes from the people we elect to organization to make our law. Only rarely is anybody put into bureau for being biddable and honest and believing in enforce the laws equitably and neutrally anymore. We elect those with money, next to polished but meaningless words, etc.
And we protest laws that might mar criminals. Both rich and poor...criminals get more protection than citizens. And if a challenger says he believes within a code of ethics lacking loopholes, he is pilloried as a religious nut in reporters.
Anyhow, while I am not a lawyer, from what I read you gotta permit the shoplifters come and go as they will, unless you hire a police officer to be in attendance to protect your goods. Or get hold of yourself deputized!!
I sympathize with you! But ask a legal representative in your nouns tho!
There are two general standards for nouns. One is the person departed the store without paying. The other is the individual hid the items on his personage or in a case to avoid paying for them. You need to find out which standard your community is using.
You might be justifiably able to lock the door and maintain the thief within, but it is a bad theory. Panicked thieves can be fundamentally dangerous. Is what he is stealing worth your injury or disappearance?
Invest in a moral closed circuit TV system. Invest in merchandise alarms. Hire a payment firm, if you must. And, finally, always, other, prosecute the shoplifter. Word will get around that your store is a tough nut and the thieve will go to an easier spot.
As others said it is a VERY bad model. Of course there are criminal charges that can be bought against you. But others covered that.
So someone have something in a jacket, you see it and lock the door. They whip it out before the police come so you enjoy no proof. They can sue you bigtime and heaven assistance you if it happens to be a minority.
So the individual is trapped. They could pull a pierce, a gun or even a toaster. Say they just instead seize an employee and emergency the door be opened. Employee get arm or back twisted and they can sue you. They could purely say that you put them surrounded by danger.
It is equal as robbery. You tell workforce to just steadily hand over the change. So yes, no touching, no locking doors and no confrontation even if is a twinkie.
Much depends on the business as to what to do. Changing line of verbs with displays can work. If you enjoy some items that are more expensive have them surrounded by a higher traffic nouns.
Sometimes training staff to always be out on the floor and ask "can I serve you" can help. Having team doing more stocking during high traffic times not earlier or after the store closes. the list is incessant.
If you have a small business you could in actuality go to home depot and install a few cameras yourself. Some business owners purely post a sign saying " these premises are monitored by CCTV".
By and immense studies show that the human element is most high-status. If a person enter the store and is looked directly at with a "hello" that help plus it is good business. If adjectives of the employees are bunched up discussion about doesn`t matter what someone is going to steal. If the cashier/cashiers are bogged down checking people out someone will steal.
Studies also show that in actuality spending more money on an extra employee or two can certainly save road more in admiration to losses. Some businesses also make more money purely in sale because there are empire about.
So knowing the business you enjoy is key to a honourable answer.
What does Internet profiling mean?
This is the single term contained by general that I am asking going on for. "Internet profiling" what does this mean?Answers: I'm not sure that "internet profiling" have a precise definition as yet.
But, within general, it refers to the collection of information nearly you based on the question you ask at Google, Yahoo!, and other search engines; the sites you stop by while browsing the net; the merchandise you direct online; and the like.
The information to be exact collected about you is repeatedly sold to merchants and other more or less lawful parties. But frequent people are concerned that it might be used for smaller amount innocent purposes either by the elected representatives spying on you or crooks trying to steal your identity.
Consider this case and pass proper legal advice--?
An arranged nuptials took place some 1 year back, the bridegroom said adjectives fraud things about himself ( his grades, degree, property, father errand etc) and his family circumstance by deception, took thickset dowry, works in IT company but his some degree are farce, heavy mental and physical torture of girl by inlaws, attempt to damage the girls' character, attempted murder of the girl but she yell and was save by neighbours, girl is mba but due to fear disappeared her gud job, and immediately has a child. Doesn't want to return back-fears her energy and her child.Please tell the charges that could be framed aginst the boy's and line. Give legal suggestion and complications in them. Also the time this travel case may take to settle.
Answers: In your second question, if that be concerning this lady single I told you that all these facts you mention in relation to this case attract both division 3 & 4 of the The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
as well slice 498A Indian Penal Code relating to cruelty. What are the complications involved in such cases is, that as far provision of slot 3 & 4 of The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
are concerned, here section 3 can even attract this female & her family for giving dowry but clause 4 attracts only the husband & his own flesh and blood for asking dowry for which onus to prove lies on them to prove they never asked for it, not this lady or her kinfolk to prove they were asked for it. As far provision of passage 498A IPC are concerned it will be the medical reports & other evidences of this lady to prove the physical & mental wound inflicted on her by this man while demanding dowry. Once these issues regarding seeking dowry & inflicting physical cruelty surrounded by doing so is proved this man & his other relatives involved in such activate will be sent to jail for polite time. I cannot give anytime spell for these cases will take for settlement,may be five to seven years even more.
Under Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and Divorce Act 1869 nearby are certain grounds underneath which divorce can be sought. In given fact by u the grounds on which a petition can be file is on the basis of wrong information given by the other body i.e. on cheating at the time of marriage, physical and mental torture to girl after nuptials, defamation is also a valid ground on which divorce can be asked for. Attempt to murder can be proved next to the help of neighbors if they enjoy witnessed it. Charges can be made against the boy and every one who was supporting him, also protection for the girl and child be requested for within the court.
About charges it depends after filing the petition within court what all grounds are proved and underneath what charges the matter go. What il suggest u is that consult a lawyer and also be all set with your evidence that u want to prove surrounded by courts. Cause the other party might also be trying to conduct yourself against u in the court. So if u want to approach court later do it before them.
Best of luck..
"An arranged conjugal." Well, you've said it all right in that.
---You should be asking this question to a legal representative instead on answers yahoo forum, if its a real existence issue---
You'll need an arranged legal representative. Maybe a deranged lawyer. Perhaps I can minister to.
When i turn 18 is my record cleaned?
Well i be convicted of a misdemeanor of false reporting. I am currently 17 and was wondering if it will jump away when i turn 18?Answers: For most things. It will be there if the military or the Government want to see it, but otherwise, you will be okay. If it's for a errand, the record should be hermetic.
it wont magically disappear when you turn 18. it takes 7 years for it to that. but if you be cleared of all charges surrounded by the end. it shouldnt come up.
the best process to find out is just be in motion to the sheriffs office when you turn 18 and ask for a fund ground check and see if that shows up.
I would think at 18 it would be hermetic. at any rate with it self a misdemeanor it will go away to adjectives except law enforcement and senate in 7 years.
No. It doesn't clear up until you are 40. You can catch it cleaned up if you go to court... I reflect on it's a rather simple procedure.
sometimes, this happen automatically. sometimes, an application must be filed to hold the juvenile record 'expunged'. It adjectives depends on the state, and, on the 'class' of the crime (how the crime would have be prosecuted if the person have NOT been a juvenile, or if the juvenile have been prosecuted as an full-size.
As of 12am on your 18th birthday, your criminal record will be exponged, and when involving the govt, since it is a misd. they give somebody the third degree, but for something like that, it will elapse by. Felonies are the things that really nip you in the butt.
To acquire off the story stay out of trouble.. You do the crime you pay the time.. Ciao
I believe that once a misdemeanor is written into your archives it stays there when you accomplish 18, 19, 25, 30 and so on. Life goes on near a misdemeanor written into your records. You can bring a job because most article handlers are bored and sloppy.
You entail to petition the state county and city, to expunge your
juvy records. No felony's and it shouldn't be a problem. Best of
luck. and behave yourself.LOL
Interesting answers your getting.
Your history will be "sealed". That means it still exists and will verbs to exist forever. However, to open a hermetically sealed record requires a court direct. Those kinds of directives an not lightly given out.
Frankly, you misdemeanor charge is so minor that you own very little to verbs about.
The individual routine query to your juvenile copy will come from the military and then individual if you are in procession for a clearance for classified information. The misdemeanor is too minor to even interfere with that.
The ethnic group answering this question hold their collective heads up their asses.
You've get to find out what the laws are within your state, in your jurisdiction, and don't rely upon strangers for information. Including me.
Shipping to Canada?
I have a flat rate priority letters envelope with a video activity inside. I need to e-mail to Toronto. I filled out the 2976 form for customs.do I want any other forms.and .what the heck do I do with the 2976 form...on the USPS website it say to take the form to the post department..Im trying to print shipping label from home and avoid post departmentAnswers: You're going to have to bring it to the post bureau. If you are mailing anything over a pound, you hold to mail it from a post bureau and anything with a form attached mostly has to be taken to the post bureau.
With a 2976 form, you fill it out completely and consequently remove the backing from the left-hand side. Stick it to the moved out of your mailing sign. This is the only form you call for. Once you bring it to the post office, the clerk will remove the white right-hand side of the form; this is kept by the post bureau for 30 days.
More Questions and Answers:
[2386] - [1315] - [1474] - [2237] - [1008] - [434] - [673] - [1800] - [951] - [915] - [2427] - [1624] - [1760] - [1377] - [1345] - [110] - [78] - [748] - [1858] - [537]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
