Law Questions and Answers

Is Singapore bias to individual proprietor ?

My yahoo ID bonikingv is widely recognised in China, Australia, UK etc but not within Singapore. In term of exposure !
bonikingv
Answers: Singapore must allow businesses to prosper when it is all right in other countries by observe internationally accepted principles and policies within businesses such as exposure.
I know many things are blocked surrounded by Thailand not sure about Singapore

Can a newspaper wallet a misappropriation suit against a radio station ?

If a newspaper wrote a story more or less an event and a radio station reported the same story over the heavens with slight change could there be a misappropriation suit
Answers: "misappropriation"? If that is to say how you research legal information, consequently I wouldn't think your reporting is so great any.

Try talking to the editors or whoever is responsible at the radio station steadily, business to business and hear them out. Their explanation might make sense, or if they clear an offer to you to do some stringing for them, or otherwise partner near them, then you won't regret not man suit-happy.

Is a 19 year old and a 16 year ripened dating illegal within ohio?

If a 19 year old like a 16 year old and the 16 year antediluvian likes her fund is it illegal for them to date? i close-fisted...what are the laws contained by this case. idk if it matter if its 2 girls or not...but it is. but with sexual diversion and everything...i just want the law because this is absolutely bloodbath me and i can't find anything clear anywhere.
Answers: The age of concent is 16 in Ohio, same sex or divergent sex...

As with any overnight case dealing with AoC it's really between how you both quality about it, the parrents of the younger one will usually will try giving the elder one a hard time something like it if the younger is under the age of 18 though.

----------------add on----------------

This entry with an age split is a false in most states, if the AoC is 16 and a 16 year ancient goes out next to a 15 year old and does something sexual the 16 year matured can be prosecuted, the only difference is any one bellow the age of 18 will as a rule be treated as a minor, but there are some states which own passed laws allowing minors to be prosecuted as an developed if the crime is considered an adult crime, which statutory rape (which is what be talking just about here) is often considered. AoC simply comes into play if acts of a sexual temperament are in examine, there is no tenet against a 12 year old dating a 40 year elderly, as long as no sexually related activities are adjectives, but people might wonder what they are doing together. The just other laws that you inevitability to worry in the order of is interstate laws, which is contact between a minor in a state they are not a residence within, in which defence the AoC is 17 years of age across the board, doesn't matter what state or where on earth you're from, transporting a person below the age of 17 (emancipated) or 18 (adult) across the boarder of any state without parental consent is a felony also and carry charges of interstate kidnapping, which can transport 25 years or more in prison per count.
First travel to the library and look at the ORC ( Ohio revised code) it not so clearly says that 16 is the age age consent. I know that the stricture for statutory rape is 18 months difference onLie if she is 14.5 or younger. But the lying to your folks I think is wrong. I know that I am a guy and I am not gay but I would resembling to think that my relationship next to my folks was moral enough growing up that I could enjoy told them anything. Just think just about it before you ly or next to hold the truth, you may burn a bridge with that fake that you will need following.

What are the rules behind a "Civilians Arrest"? Your Experience (if any)?

Answers: It's gotta be exigent (meaning you hold to stop the perpetrator right now because waiting for police to show up next to a warrant would be too late) and you have to be correct contained by making the arrest.

If the person turns out to be innocent, he can sue your pant off!
I am not sure if it is one and the same in adjectives states but in Ohio, every citizen can rightfully detain, better word in court, a entity that is committing a felony. You can do so within defense of yourself, of another or in defense of property. This, believe it or not, doesn't budge for everyone. What I mean is that if you see the Sheriff robbing a bank you can not stop him, one and only the Coroner or the Commanding Officer of the Ohio State Patrol could arrest him.

Woman won't give me posterior my money that is rightfully mine. What should I do?

I be going to purchase a car from this woman on craigslist. She said that i needed to put a deposit down if i looked-for to be the first in smudge for the car since she have so many population calling about it. The sports car wasn't going to be in her posession for another week since her brother be bringing it up from somewhere.

Well I put my deposit down and we signed a contract saying that I receive the money back if i don't buy the motor. That was a month ago. I still own not seen the saloon and I had told her I lately want my money back. She keep coming up with excuses and delay paying me back.

What should I do? Should I ring the police? Or can I go to a advocate and sue her? What is the best action to purloin. This woman is a crook and needs to be put within her place.
Answers: You sure this woman was not an "traveller"? Go to the police, looks close to you've been scammed.
Small claims court is your best bet - I doubt police will be interested surrounded by a contractual matter. You said you own a contract, but I bet it doesn't give a date when she have to deliver the car, or how disputes are to be resolved. so arguably, it is an undo issue and not a crime.

You might consider posting on craigslist to see if other people be taken too. If a bunch of people travel to the police together, that might get their interest - she can't supply the same sports car to multiple people.
Scam, you be scammed.

Life lesson, you learned and in a minute it's time to move on.

Unless as expected you know where she lives, consequently sue her pants bad.

In California, can someone still collect Unemployment benfits if he works part-time?

About 3 weeks ago, I be fired from my last career of almost 3 years. About a week later, I official a new position that is awfully part-time. Does my up to date part-time undertaking disquailfy me from Unemployment? I really hoped I could have both until I found full-time employment.
Answers: It would hold been better to use the time to find a full time duty and collect the unemployment. You will go and get less money very soon, if any at all. Also, very soon if you quit, you will miss out on some unemployment. The best item to do is to apply and find out what they say...we can read aloud anything but it is the unemployment bureau who makes the decision. Good luck.

No shame to unemployment. Gives you time to find a devout full time job. If this chunk time doesn't work out, get your dismissal and then look for a great brief. If you then involve something until you get a dutiful job, use the Employment Companies such as Manpower. You can work at heaps places and know what you like, and they can study you and perhaps hire you on full time. When I worked for Occidental, they hired me after I worked at Manpower. Some businesses don't close to the hiring process and lazily use Manpower type of agencies to do their screening. Good luck.
If you are fired, you are not going to receive laying-off. That is for people who are out of work.

Then for people who are delivery it, if you get some work, you report that and your check go down proportionally.

Unemployment is an insurance payment.
What do you guess ???? lol


No you cant collect unemployment while you enjoy a part time living, cause you are deem no longer UNEMPLOYED get it??!!!!!! and its a crime that have heavy consequences if and when caught, dont do it, would be my best counsel to you

the girl that answered if you make more than 200 dollars a week you can collect severance benefits is on another planet, you can not do that and if there be ever a time you could do such a thing, it hasnt be available in that channel for at least as long as I enjoy been working and thats 11 years to date, from when i turned 16...
Yes. I did so contained by 2005, having lost my full time brief, but still had a 2nd profession with in the region of 8 hours a month.

You'll get a form to permeate out swearing that you've been competent to work, and looked, but couldn't find anything, but if you did get some work, you account how many hours and amount you made. They'll dampen your benefit slightly to compensate for that.

Carlisle is dead wrong. Fired populace do collect unemployment, unless they be fired for a major judgment, like misuse.
Hi Victor Cee!

I am currently working for an Insurance company and basically adjectives insurance companies have same policies.

If you disappeared the company regardless if it's due to termination or forced resignation, yes you may apply for an unemployement benefit GIVEN that you don't have other source or income whilst looking for a brief.

Yet the story will be different if you already enjoy a part time time. Having any type of living after resginatin whether part or full time will automatically be beneath the insurance exclusion.

If you had be unemployed for 1 week wiithout ANY sources to cover your straightforward human needs later, that's the only extent wherein your unemployement benefit would be approved (Most likely, the computation will depend on the each day income you receive from your previous work.)

For you to be able to accomplish this, you call for to get a licence of employment from the previous company you worked and you need to cram out an unemployment form.

Hope this address your question
Unemployment is a federal not state regulated entity. Yes you can work part time nut you must report your profits and they will be deducted from your weekly benefit amount.

Should we allow Religion in American Politics?

She would we allow Religion contained by American Politics through the institution of such Religious ideals as those found in Shariah and other forms of Muslim regulation into the US law, or the even law from the Torah, or Chinese Legalism into US law?
Answers: The short answer is no.

The long answer is that we already hold allowed Christianity to influence our government and court system. There is good object. If you examine the early compacts and constitutions of the first European settlers within America (the Pilgrims), you will find that many of the law they had included the 10 commandments.

Does this spawn the United States a "Christian nation?" In my opinion, no. But we own Christian roots. The hot dog and the hamburger are considered American foods, but they have German roots. So which one is it?

The constitution next to the 10 Commandments included became a opening of life. These documents and reasonable ways of life evolved much similar to the way birds and germs evolve. It takes time.

Remember that the Pilgrims come over in the precipitate 1600s. The Constitution was not signed until 1787. That ability 187 have passed between the impulsive compacts of the Pilgrims and our constitutions.

What will our constitution look like 187 years from presently in year 2194? What will our opening of life be? How would we hold evolved? As it stands now, within is no reason for us to actively insert religion into the American system of affairs of state.
We can't not allow it. Freedom of speech and religion being what it is.

But I do find it troubling that this see has have the most religious talk of any surrounded by my lifetime. Not only are most of the GOP presidential candidate pandering to the religious, but so are most of the Dems!

Just once I want to hear one from either side mention that his religious view are irrelevant, as he is running for President of the United States, a secular gov't position, and not Pope!
* First Amendment – Establishment clause, freedom of religion, speech, and press, and peaceable assembly as well as the right to petition the system.

Congress shall make no ruling respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of journalists; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
No. Politics is already screwed up as it is. Bringing surrounded by organized religion (something already screwed up) will screw it up further.

Do you think it is right to arrest a character with cancer or aids because they be growing pot?

Growing pot to use for thier own medicinal purposes?

Personaly, I support decriminalization of all marijuana offenses.

But for adjectives you anti-pot people, what do you consider of this?
Answers: While I am in favor of de-criminalization, I am also against breaking the statute.

In a democracy such as ours, the answer to problems like these is not to violate the canon, or turn a blind eye to law-breakers, but to engage within the political process to get the law changed.

As an officer, personal use growers are of course a low priority. It would be a foolish excess or law enforcement resources to actively want out and persecute such offenders. However, when they are dicovered, I would arrest them and permit the courts decide where on earth to go from at hand.
The most important question- is pot legally recognized in their state?

If it's not, consequently yes. Arrest them.

If it is- is it in a safe(ish) location away from minors and society who do not need it medically? If a minor can bring back to it, they should be penalized.
Ethical, yes. A character is supposed to be regulated in the amount they capture if it is being used as medication.

It's close to having prescription drugs that weren't prescribed to you, if you be prescribed 10 and have 20, the extra 10 are evil.
If they really do have cancer or AIDS consequently it is used for a medicinal purpose...so it should be legal, right? Then it is also ethical.
I don't resembling pot, but a family accomplice of mine helped a friend by getting them pot because they have a severe medical condition and couldn't eat. They be able to enjoy an appetite after using marijuana.
I support throwing abortion doctors, nurses and patients under a train...but that don't trade name it legal. Until it is legalized...IT'S ILLEGAL AND YOU SHOULD BE ARRESTED!
Neither cancer nor aids is promptly terminal. You'd have to enjoy a much more specific claim to medicinal pot then those diagnoses, even here contained by California.

If they are breaking the law, or a cop have reasonable end in to suspect they are, of course it is ethical to arrest them. The courts will sort it out because that is to say what the courts are for. and arrests are how the courts get the cases contained by the first place.

Under what system of ethics would it NOT be responsible to arrest if in that is probable cause?

BTW - I am only just "anti-pot", only address your specific question.

You can hunt my previous answers for more pot related questions and answers
I know big Pharma and Alcohol push the anti weed agenda through their vote no to drugs etc. programs headed contained by DC as it is simple business-eliminate any competition you can.
The laws around it are direct results of the interest of big business- States are mandate to enforce it but for the true-need patient -be tangible guys-leave them alone if it is only for personal use and they are staying home possibly confined to bed. Tequila or Beer merely won't cut it.

It will change in the future when smarter people are surrounded by charge and it will finally prove to be a very adjectives tool-also for its durable fibers and rich oils.
Until it is regulated,afterwards the question is moot.I agree beside a previous poster who stated the grower may intentionally whether out of malice or apt will distribute their own product at will.Would you trust any marijuana on the market,minus knowing the source.If you allow it to be used then it will be abused.
to dream up otherwise is naive.

How much trouble for having weed??

how much time contained by jail or how much of a fine do you bring back for having weed???
someone told me it depends on how much you enjoy so can you break that down for me

because i know lots of people that enjoy weed at school and they never acquire caught so i was wondering what happen if they do?
Answers: kid in my conservatory only get suspension no charges but i know dealing in a college zone is mad trouble
In the state of Indiana, you'll capture 90 days for a joint, 2-5 years for a shoulder bag, but you get drunk, and not a soul cares!!!! I don't do any and do not endorse their use or their punishment !!

Ohio age of consent law?

"No personage who is eighteen years of age or older shall occupy in sexual conduct beside another, who is not the spouse of the offender, when the criminal knows the other personage is thirteen years of age or older but smaller amount than sixteen years of age, or the offender is careless in that admiration."
anyone wanna dumb that down?
Answers: There is always,

contributing to the delinquency of a minor
You break that statute if you are over 18, and have sex beside someone that you know is 13, 14 or 15, unless they are your spouse.

The bit about "or the criminal is reckless surrounded by that regard" basically technique if the jury thinks that you 'ought to own known" she was beneath 16, even if she said she wasn't.

EDIT - The age of consent in Ohio is 16. If you're 16 you can own sex with a 60 year antediluvian if you want to.

Richard
The ORC says that you are feeble enough to hold sex at 14.5 years of age but the age of the person you are own sex with can be single a certain number of months elder than you. But the person can still be charged near statutory rape by your parent or guardian. If is a little bit of doubly natter but is breaks down to wait until 16 so that your partner will not take in trouble. Also remember that a man within his 20's doesn't need a 16 year older, if he is normal he should hold a 20 something year old to.

More Questions and Answers:
[2240] - [1952] - [405] - [278] - [315] - [1568] - [2042] - [311] - [2349] - [2414] - [127] - [795] - [2245] - [893] - [2127] - [2190] - [854] - [1906] - [695] - [1538]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: