Law Questions and Answers

Without paying for the service?

where can i do a criminal environment check on someone on the computer

Answers: call the POLICE station and ask for the WEBsight to look on for resembling EXAMPLE: pedifiles and then you will enjoy the LINK you need.

I did this past.

There are a lot of sites. THey in recent times are not free.

Can a employer hold a paycheck?

can a employer hold a paycheck later later the date printed on the check? like if the check be dated for 12/22/07 could they legally hang on to it untill 12/24/07? i heard that this be illegal and i be curious, and also can they withhold one persons check for no motivation and give it to another?

Please post links or sites as to where on earth i can print info off. thank you!!!!

Answers: I believe they can hold the check as long as they close to, with-in reason. I believe that technically the maximum pay cheque period length for non-salaried workforce is two-weeks, or twice a month, with no more than 15 days of non-compensation.

But they want to print their checks a week ahead of releasing the checks they can without a doubt do so. Same as if they choose to print them months ahead and just expect that you work the alloted time. (Will hold to make compensations for secondary hours)

As far as releasing it to another person, exceedingly not legal lacking your written consent, unless you have be determined financially unstable and signed a waiver to have a court approved financial clerk. They can forward portions/entirety to
affairs of state escrow accounts for child support, dui charges(some states take this direct from your pay), or other such court invoked charges.

I conjecture it is illegal to withhold a paycheck in need some extremely valid reason, and next it can be debated by the labor relations of your nouns. Contact your local board of labor relations. If they can't show good court cause for holding it, they will be fined.

Why is it okay to abort babies in the luggage of rape? The baby didn't do anything wrong.?

Answers: So agree to me see if understand this:

Because she be raped and conceived a child, she should not have the right to conceive a child contained by love with a lifetime partner for the duration of the gestation and imagined several months after. Her own family must be delayed because someone deposited a successful sperm contained by her reproductive tract.
Because she was raped, she should own long term scar and physical reminders of a pregnancy she didn't initiate.
Because she was raped, she must lift the chance that she could die surrounded by childbirth - while uncommon, still a possible outcome of her self violated. (Remember that the US currently ranks higher that going on for any other Western country in both infant and protective mortality.) You are advocating a possible disappearance sentence for being sufferer to a violent exploit.
If she has other children, those children will be powerless to receive her full attention while she is in tardy stage pregnancy, delivery and reclamation.
Because she was raped, she will get through, for the duration of her pregnancy that is "obvious" to others, speculation in the order of her sex life, her social circumstances, and "Oh, how sweet - when its it due?" from oblivious bystanders, to remind her how sweet it wasNOT from the moment the rape commenced.
She may ably suffer postpartum depression, which can put her at risk for depression later surrounded by her life, as if the rape itself be not enough of a trauma.

Most rapes still budge unreported because of the stigma, guilt, fear, and trauma that shepherd this violent deed. One doesn't get the morning after pill if one doesn't dance for medical care.
Will you allow her to elevate this child of rape? Some mothers do so and do it with love and charity of heart. Many, however, are not pious parents to the children they conceive accidentally; how much more of a challenge it will be to parent one conceived within violence? If she is to endow with up for adoption the "half innocent" child, will she not own to grieve that? Won't she have to stress over whether the child is person treated well, if it is showing a predisposition to hostility itself, whether it may some day be a sufferer since she can not raise and counsel it herself?

Don't kid yourself - she won't procure off the hook emotionally next to ANY choice she makes. She will be face with guilt over putting a child up for adoption, for abortion, and for raise it herself. The consequences of the rape will be hers, so the choices MUST REMAIN HERS as well.

Let's buy and sell with the issue of rape more effectively up to that time we start inflicting the consequences of an unintended pregnancy on women.

You are right that the baby didn't do anything wrong. Nor did the babies that enjoy the bad fortune to be conceived on islands surrounded by the Indian Ocean or in Iraq. Let's put some go into taking care of problems that are of honest public concern, and let the woman give somebody a lift care of this terribly private concern.

If a woman is raped and she goes to the hospital, she is usually offered the "morning after pill" which would prevent a fertilized egg from implant in the bed of the uterus. In my inference, that would be acceptable.

Later possession abortions, I think are wrong. I have an idea that we need to coach women and let them know what to do contained by case of a rape so any potential pregnancy can be prevented instantly.

But that's a personal choice, and it's not for me or anyone else to judge others on this issue.

I wouldn't blame a woman for wanting to carry rid of a child who is the product of rape.

Think of all the psychological trauma of rape.
Then, deliberate of all the crappy, hormonal and psychological trauma of pregnancy, especially an unwanted pregnancy.

I wouldn't know how to do it, so I won't say that every other woman have to deal next to that kind of trauma. If she wishes to give birth to the kid and administer it up for adoption or keep it, more power to her. She's stronger than I am.

Oh, you're rich. . .

As a woman, I don't attention to detail to be reminded everyday for the rest of my life of something that wasn't my guiltiness or of my volition to do.

Really. . . You obviously can't gain pregnant, or else you might comprehend the stupidity of the statement.

It's NOT ok in my personal inference. I worked as a volunteer in a Pregnancy Center (we only just moved) and I had a few cases of this exact incident.
When a woman is raped it is VERY difficult to adopt the fact that a child have been conceived from such a rebellious act. However, you are SO correct surrounded by saying the child didn't do anything wrong. It take a very strong woman to verbs the pregnancy once this has happen.
God chose to have this child conceived, yes even within such violent act God chooses GOOD to come from the event.
A woman may choose to keep the child and love him/her for what they truly are...a miracle of God's work. Some women also choose placing the child within a loving home with parents who are incompetent to conceive.
Anyway you look at it..conception=life. Plan and simple.
Blessings all around.

With your apparently human being male - you lose more points for not have empathy for the victim.

The foundation it is kept as an exception for most prolife politicians is due to the higher occasion of the victim committing suicide, or not getting prenatal fastidiousness that would better her and the child's chances. Also, rape as incest could create a child that would not be viable.

While adoption should be offered as an opportunity, the last piece a victim wants is to be told she has no other option.

It is not a baby until it is born. So your grill is based on a anecdotal proposition.

In any case, it doesn't situation if there be a rape or not when it comes to justifying abortion.

If you don't want an abortion, then that is to say your right. Don't have one.

How can i get my drivers license pay for? my dad cancelled it by calling the DMV and i need to release liability?

so my dad think driving is a privledge so he took away my drivers license when i moved out of his house and in near my mom. They share joint custody but surrounded by general i choose where on earth i want to be. i'm 16 and live in CA.
anyway, as a punishment he call the DMV and had my driver's license suspended by revoking his signature on my DL44 driver's license form. I passed the exam and drove for a few weeks before i moved but once i moved i couldnt drive anymore. is in attendance anything i can do to make it so i a moment ago need my mothers signature on the driver's license form even though they share pooled custody? Is there anything i can do to bring back my license back besides keep on until i'm 18?
it seems similar to a custody battle would be alot of work so i don't know if its worth it.

Answers: Driving IS a privilege, given to you by both the State and your parents if you are below 18. While I tend to agree that if the facts are as you stated your father is being a push, the rule in California appears thoroughly clear that if you are under 18, and your parents enjoy joint custody, BOTH parents must adopt financial responsibility. I am not a family statute expert, but if your father is doing this out of some form of retaliation, there may be some sort of recourse within the divorce proceedings. You might ask your mother to consult her attorney on that.

two options
1. hold yor mom take it to the mediate.
2. ride it pout until you turn 17 then return with emancipated.

See if your mom would be willing to sign the form, and ask the DMV and see if she can. If they own joint custody her signature should be equally valid, however, if you do receive your license reinstated your Father could strike back at you within other ways - especially when you are getting ready to step to college..

Consider the cost (insurance, car) for you to drive. Do you have a profession to offset the costs? Could you tramp or take public transpo to where on earth you need to budge? Do you have straight As? (The ultimate would be good to prove your Dad be getting back at you for moving contained by with your Mom, and could acquire you a discount with insurance.)

Edit:You obligation to document your attempts at contact and to visit. I hold a friend whose father refused to call on, then turned around and said she did and he shouldn't enjoy to pay support for college. So brand name sure you document. With the latest response - it looks resembling you'd have to lift legal recourse - maybe he's violated part of the agreement? So put together sure you make attempts to enjoy contact, and document them. And if your paternal grandparents are still alive gross an effort to see them (not bringing this up) or if they are too far away drop them a nice chatty card near a photo about your existence.

driving is a privilege
with that said i would enjoy to agree that perhaps your dad did the wrong entry but that is not my place to read aloud. if his signature is required talk to him as his child and as a immature adult. explain your concerns don't argue a moment ago try to explain how you feel and hopefully he will realize it is a privilege you deserve. except your mom may have to pursue other option with the DMV.

EDIT:
check next to DMV your mothers signature may be enough since you will enjoy insurance the financial responsibility part for your father won't situation. go over this website next to your mother and then telephone the local DMV office. upright luck

http://www.dmv.ca.gov/dl/dl_info.htm#FRM...

work it out with your mom and dad directly. have a license and no insurance will be a problem. you need their support. you also requirement to learn to communicate / negotiate better beside your parents. i would think this could be a prized learning experience for you. the right piece to do is to not try to upstep your Dad. Discuss why he did what he did . Understand the reasons and next negotiate solutions. do it the right way. better for adjectives parties involved. positive holidays.

Language discrimination?

I read a report story about the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations which file a discrimination complaint against a restaurant for have a sign saying to direct in English. Funny how they file the complaint in English.

Could the restaurant owner hold been charged near contempt of court if he had hired a Spanish-only speaking defense legal representative?

Answers: Probably not.
In theory, this is a possibility. In actual reality, this is almost impossible: statutes and cases in the US are written contained by English, even if English is not the official lexis. Any prospective practitioner would have to wade through these documents and as such, would enjoy to be familiar with the English terms.
Engaging the services of such a lawyer would probably be not amount to contempt of court: I don't see how such a behavior would be contumacious to the court, although it is somewhat crude. At best, it is an attempt to embarrass the plaintiff/petitioner. The adjectives target, it seems, is the plaintiff, fairly than the court.
Perhaps, the intentions of the defendant would ultimately reveal whether he, she or it deserves to be charged with contempt of court.
My two cents worth: the court should not bring offended beside this act, but instead, require the restaurant owner to rivet the services of an English-speaking lawyer. Easier done, smaller number acrimony, less gamble away of time. More $$$ to English-speaking practitioners, too.

Absolutely not, please read up on what "contempt" is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of... might be a good place to start. They probably cited their sources, you can check those.

I'm sick and tired of this subject this is America an English speaking country! As for the give somebody the third degree that is what he should enjoy done! And then have someone doing sign language to interpret.

Yes, as I said an English speaking country.

Don't know the legalities of your skin, but people could cram history to find out what language Columbus spoke? And Amerigo spoke? And the resourceful inhabitant of these continents now name after Amerigo still speak? People could be less racist within calling people undemocratic human beings. A better phrase is "people minus visas." Then ask why they don't have visas.

Learning more than one lexis will help beside history and world geography. Medicine and Science are usually Latin based so Spanish is a well brought-up choice.

So many folks already know Spanish - Las Vegas, San Diego, San Antonio, Los Angeles. and Native American languages - Seattle, Walla Walla...

I regard as in a culturally diverse nation similar to the US we need to own some tolerance, to other languages. When I step to the local "El Rodeo" I’m not expected to speak Spanish to order, but...I do fashion an effort to right to be heard "gracias" and "de nada" That is a personal preference, for me.

I don't know Chinese and I don't want a Chinese owner unfolding me to order surrounded by Chinese, when all I want is some veggie stir fry!

Yes, this nation is primarily English speaking, and for the most chunk even those who do not speak English as their primary language, trademark an effort, and some do not. That is what make America.America!!!

Just another law suit to tie up an already strained judicial system!

*lol* great cross-question

uhm...I have no thought...

SI :D

To whom do I report an online business which took my money without providing the product?

A few weeks ago, I purchased an reason with a website offering online French tutoring. I have noticed the ad on several reputable websites and decided to try it. Their demo program revision worked fine, but was predetermined. I purchased the full version of the program online. I received an automatic email taking from the company, but they have neither allowed me online access or sent a copy of the program. I checked next to my bank and the amount be deducted from my reason. I contacted the support email of the company, and within minutes I received an automatic see that their email address does not exist. The phone number they have tabled for support is a disconnected number. I checked the physical address they list, and that address is in reality an entirely different business who has never hear of them. I am having my mound investigate. To whom should I report this company as bogus, since they are still advertising on several giant profile websites?

Answers: The FBI is really interested in credit card fraud..contact your local bureau.

It wouldn't hurt any to report them to BBB, but I agree with the personality who mentioned the FBI. The BBB handles complaints, but the FBI will investigate the fraud and crime. After adjectives, they not only took your money, if you compensated online they have your personal edge information as well.

Question...?

Is there a difference between sexual maltreat, sexual assault and sexual battery? If so, please explain.

Thank you.

Answers: Sexual treat roughly can be inappropriate touching within private areas. sexual assault is the forcing of sexual activities upon an unwilling get-together could be date rape . sexual battery is rape using Brut force.

Age limit to find a job contained by California?

what's the age requirement to get a opportunity legally surrounded by california?

Answers: CA Child Labor ages 14 & 15 Must have completed 7th category to work while school surrounded by session

Work permits
Except surrounded by limited circumstances defined surrounded by law and summarized contained by the child labor law booklet, adjectives minors under 18 years of age employed within the state of California must have a charter to work.

Prior to permitting a minor to work, employer must possess a valid permit to enlist and work. The permit to draw on and work are issued on the same form. A authorization to employ and work contained by industries other than entertainment is usually issued by an authorized creature at the minor's school. During summer months or when institution is not in session the work charter is obtained from the superintendent of the academy district in which the minor resides.

School within session:
3 hours per school light of day outside of school hours 8 hours on any non-school hours of daylight. 18 hours per week

School not in session :
8 hours per daylight 40 hours per week

in most states a personality is required to be at least 16 yrs of age to work within the main stream workforce, due to child labor law. There are rare cases where on earth a person 14 - 15 can attain a job but it any has to be for a close relative or they must show create for needing to work. Under 18 a soul also usually needs proper weekly work from their school and is fixed to what hours they can work.

I just get offered a really good situation and thirteen years ago I was convicted of driving while intoxicated.?

Should I be worried? I did put this on the application.

Answers: Though it greatly depends on the employer and any surety clearance you may need, I wouldn't dream up so. You were honest more or less it. It was pretty a long time ago and most likely it's in recent times a misdemeanor.

If you disclosed an old misdemeanor and it didn't stop you from getting the undertaking, you shouldn't worry in a minute as long as you don't do a repeat.

Hotel parking lot robbery. info please law advice?

if a hotel has surveillance cameras posted higher than their building to their parking lot below. And you purposefully park there and your vehicle is robbed is the hotel liable? What if their cameras are pseudo? Isn't that misrepresentation? Do we have a casing?

Answers: No the hotel is not liable. Businesses put up fake cameras adjectives the time as a deterrent. Most of the businesses I've dealt near may as well have fake cameras, because the picture standard was horrible, or they have the worst angles.

I once had the amiable experience of being awakened by pounding on my motel room door at 3 am contained by 20 degree weather near snow up to my A** and being asked if such and such saloon was mine, by the local Police, I have to get dressed and step out in the weather and inventory my coup��, which had adjectives kinds of stuff contained by it and lots of stuff missing... They didn't even come inside to make the darn report .. i bout froze my a** past its sell-by date and the Motels only contribution be to tell the Police what room the individual owning the silver car be in..
The pious news be that the crooks were laid-back and my stuff was immense and since it was cold they dropped most of it and run when they heard sirens, a neighbor have called it contained by... so i got vertebrae all but one camera lens... i have to wait until after trial to get hold of the stuff but I eventually after I calmed down and was heat again was appreciative, not many family ever see their stolen stuff again.My insurance paid on the claim and when i get the stuff back they still consent to me keep the money they have paid, because some stuff be slightly damaged. and my vehicle window be broken... but the motel was scott free of any duty..One reason I love my Motor Home, try and rob me and you will hear the chunka chunk of me cocking my shotgun...

The hotel is never liable. You are responsible for your own coup��, cameras or no cameras.

More Questions and Answers:
[1889] - [43] - [2145] - [490] - [1639] - [1771] - [547] - [2000] - [1142] - [1633] - [82] - [680] - [1937] - [1017] - [969] - [583] - [300] - [632] - [1013] - [1726]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: