Law Questions and Answers

I request a respounce from the top contributors?

Are you bored with silly question?
or can we make this site your own site.
pirate?

Answers: why would you ask a request for information like that it would exclude you?

I am bored next to repeating the same question over and over again.

Top ones (or variations) in this category:

1 - Why isn't weed trial? A: because stoned people find it more major to be stoned then not stoned to synchronize poltically.

2 - Was I fired legally? A: Yes, you work at will.

3 - What is the age of consent where on earth I live? A: You or he is too young if you enjoy to ask, and no, your parents being ok near it has nil to do with it.

Legal age for adults?

Just wondering with the mental copasity contained by young associates growing and the maturity rank in childish people today on the rise shouldn't the establishment be looking at making the legal age for an full-grown younger?
I mean doesn't it give the impression of being like the babyish ones are matureing so much faster now days when compared to 30 years ago?

Answers: I suggest yes they should be thinking at least around lowering it because you can't tell me that a 16 year frail boy or girl isn't educated plenty now days to put in the picture the difference between right and wrong.
maybe not make a contribution them all the perk but use common sense when it comes to the directive at least.

> Just wondering near the mental copasity in childlike people growing and the old age level within young general public today on the rise

My gf is a doctorate level psychologist who administer evaluations to adolescents and she assures me there is no such exchange happening surrounded by anything related to mental maturity, not surrounded by an academic or quantifiable sense.

*lol*

I'd answer, but I'm rolling on the floor laughing with tears streaming down my facade...

My grandparents married at age 16.
Many children went to time of war at about that age...

Are in attendance many 16 year olds today who could fiddle with either one of those things?

I regard children today are just more disrespectful. This would indicate a lower plane of maturity to me.

Legal question should be an smooth answer?

I have an up and coming audible range for temporary support and custody of a child. I am the mother and cannot afford an attorney however the father who is the one that brought this lawsuit on have an attorney.
He has made some pretty strict allegations against me and i am looking for the courts to order him to aid surrounded by my legal fees so that i can hire an attorney of my own. What is the best response when i turn before the settle to ask him to order the other delegation to fork over one thousand dollars for my attorney fees. Are there any catch to this?

Answers: You won't get it the adjudicate will pretty much laugh at that if you be still married or he owed you money maybe the most you can expect outta the regard as being is a city lawyer or endorsed adviser

Is the father a spouse? If so, spousal support (note, this is not alimony) may be available to you for your officially recognized issues.

In my county, the office of the Public Defender will assist contained by these exact types of issues. Legal Aid is also a recourse if that is available contained by your area.

ADDRESSING YOUR EDIT: Yes, report the Judge or Magistrate you issue concerning your financial status and your unrepresented status. They may appoint you an attorney either through the appointment detail or the public defender. Where I live, a court's denial of counsel to an indigent defendant (even within custody and support issues) is grounds for appeal and a retrial on the merits of the case.

NOTE: This is where on earth I live. Your State may have different rules.

YOUR SECOND EDIT: Has paternity (legal, not alleged) be established yet? If so and in that is a child support order he's already surrounded by violation of the regulation. Even if he gets custody he's still not stale of the hook for the back child support. This, within my opinion, is why he's suing for custody, he's trying to not retribution C.S. anymore. Throw out the possibility for spousal support as you were never married.

this is a civil overnight case don't expect the judge to directive someone else to pay for you. you can see if a advocate will take it on a contingency principle and the lawyer can ask for custody and support as okay as court cost and lawyer fees.

Can Mit Romney serve the US well despite his stance change on a variety of issues?

Can someone who have followed him help clarify if he would be an asset for the country surrounded by spite of these issues over which he seemingly has a fluctating belief?

Answers: Absolutely not! You are getting Bill Clinton all over again - but on the different stance. He think by the way of the poll - zilch will change that, and you know how aggravating it can capture!

Not that I'm a Romney supporter, but the ability and eagerness to change one's mind when presented beside new evidence or a valid persuasive argument is an asset, not a liability.

As a completely wise man once said:

"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"

he claims his lone change is on abortion and i.e. because he had a alteration of heart. all his other flip-flops don't in fact exist according to mitt. he has moved toward the republican remnant to have a indiscriminate of becoming the nominee. if he actually reverts spinal column to his previous stances the republicans will be pisse* off and the democrats will suggest they won.
if that was to begin he would be an asset to America problem is he has changed so much we basically don't know.

He's a bozo. We finally got rid of him from Massachuetts. When he be governor, he was scarcely here, his lt governor did all of the work. He lone showed up when something bad happen. Just when we thought we got rid of him.

What do you think of Naomi Wolf's article "What Is Probably contained by the Missing (CIA) Tapes"?

From Wolf's article: "To judge from firsthand documents obtain by the ACLU through a FOIA lawsuit, we can guess what is probably on the missing CIA interrogation tapes -- as capably as understand why those implicated are spinning so frozen to pretend the tapes do not document a series of adjectives crimes. According to the little-noticed but extraordinarily important book 'Administration of Torture: A Documentary Record from Washington to Abu Ghraib and Beyond' (Jameel Jaffer and Amrit Singh, Columbia University Press, New York 2007), which presents dozens of productive formerly secret documents - FBI emails and memos, junk mail and interrogator "wish list," raw proof of the systemic risky torture of detainees in diverse US-held prisons -- the typical "harsh interrogation" of a suspect contained by US custody reads close to an account of abuse in archives at Yad Vashem."

Be sensible, torture is documented in this cooperation: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf...

Answers: What the Bush administration have allowed, or even encouraged, is a sickening disgrace, and a ongoing black mark on this country. And however Republicans still overwhelmingly support what they so blithely call "enhanced" interrogation.

I look up to Naomi Wolf's courage in tackle this topic, and bravo to you for this post. I totally concur with Stephen L's response.

I really hope that these crimes will be fully exposed and the perpetrators prosecuted: break open public trials would cleanse America of this ugly stain.

Nothing in this document surprises me.

There is some hope in this. Until lately the administration and its vassal agencies be arrogant enough to presume that they could conceal or simply override the truth.

Perhaps here is some chance for democracy and the constitution to reassert within your country. Until very just now these people be simply not afraid enough to verbs the evidence of their crimes. I think losing the Senate be a further step than they anticipated.

There is still some hope.

tapes?
WHAT TAPES?
I, for one, as an American, am SHOCKED...!!!
(sarcasm)

Can a person hold one single name for your entire legally recognized name?

I am watching superbad and i be wondering if you can have one single christen for your entire legal baptize. Like McLovin.

Answers: Yes, if you live in south India.

yes
look at cher
remember when prince lawfully changed his name to a symbol?
it wasn't even a word. That go-between was retarded to allow something resembling that

Yeah what about Madonna?

Or Cher?

You can legitimately change your identify to whatever you want.

I witnessed a family accomplice commit a crime?

Someone else is now serving 7 YEARS for what my own flesh and blood member did. I want to facilitate this innocent man with his appeal. What will begin if they grant him a clean trial? Will I have to testify against my people member?

Answers: You may be an supplement after the fact if you witnessed it and never reported it. It is sometimes call Misprison of a Felony. I need more facts.
In mixing to the Criminal side of this, there is potential civil liabilty for False Arrest and False Imprisonment. False Imprisonment underneath the Restatement of Torts.
If you want to help this man within prison, I suggest that you talk to a Criminal advocate since this would be newly discovered evidence and hope his release. This man who has be wrongfully convicted has a Federal civil rights claim against those who brought the charges against him base on false evidence and violation of due process. That is my print at first blush. I still need more facts from you. Then we can stir from there. I don't know adjectives the facts yet.

depends on what nearest and dearest member your husband they can't engender you or your child father or mother
however cousins and such yes they can.

If you are the one supplying the evidence as a witness, I would think you would own to testify against your family partaker.

Yes, you probably will have to testify.

You MUST do this. You CANNOT stand by and tolerate an innocent man's life be destroyed. Good luck.

Please don't permit an innocent man suffer. What if it was you that be wrongly imprisoned?

Do that right article. It won't be easy at adjectives, but it will be worth it.

You have a moral condition to call the police. More specifically ask to speak next to someone who worked on that particular crust. I'm pretty sure there's a way you can report this lacking having to testify within court, but you might have to appear back a judge contained by a deposition. Your brother would not know of this in that grip.

Call the police and find out what would be involved and thank you for your interest in seeing even-handedness served.

By the way, you're doing your brother no favor by protecting him beside your silence. A person who commits a crime will normally continue surrounded by this lifestyle until stopped by the law.

I'm not totally positive of this, so I would recommend calling a advocate. There are free legal service agencies within every city, just check the phone book for "decriminalized aid" or something like that.
Anyway, if you can organize the police to evidence that your family beneficiary did it, then you probably won't own to testify. If it's just something similar to you head them discussion about it, or you be the only witness, yeah, you might enjoy to testify. Scary, I know, but so much better than trying to sleep every night knowing an innocent guy is contained by jail. upright luck!

Parking stickers on cars?

My neighborhood has a home owner's association, and they are suggesting getting neighborhood stickers and making us put them on our cars. Is at hand any legal ground within which they can do this? We do not have a community parking lot. They newly want to monitor the cars parked in our driveways and contained by front of our homes. Shouldn't I have the right to own guest at my home? I shouldn't have to enjoy a sticker on my car. I don't close to them. I don't even have a bumper sticker!

Answers: One of the problems near homeowners associations is that they tend to be taken over by the most radical constituent of the neighborhood, and there's not much you can do about them once they are surrounded by charge.

There could be some very valid reason to have community or neighborhood parking stickers, but if you don't want this proposal, show up at the meeting and make your voice hear. Talk with your neighbors and find others contained by the area who you be aware of the way you do to support your position and argue against it.

If you don't stand up for what you want, you enjoy no right to complain about what you acquire.

I, too, live in such a complex and our association have polled us to see if we want stickers. My resounding vote was yes, but it hasn't come to miss. Here's why we need them: nearby are 200+ units within the complex, each near a two-car garage. There are another 100+ parking spots in the complex. Many residents hold so much junk contained by their garages they can't get even one vehicle in near. Many also own more than two cars. You do the math. If every one of use decided to park our cars outside the garages, we wouldn't hold enough spaces for ourselves, much smaller number for guests.

I think you'll find that if the association does implement parking stickers, that doesn't plan you can't have overnight guests. It does parsimonious that this guest would need to find a space elsewhere. If parking space is insufficient, you can see why the stickers breed sense.

And parking stickers have nought to do with other types of bumper stickers. I assume you a registration sticker on your license plate, right? Same mode of thing. It's a simple solution to an unpleasant condition: too various people and cars, too few parking spaces, residents unqualified to park due to abuses by their neighbors.

usually you draw from a guest parking pass surrounded by a situation like that that race can put on their dashboard that you give guests.

I suggest you attend the homeowners association meeting to understand the proposals.

You'd be surprised how oodles cars have parking stickers and you never notice them. Don't worry more or less it.

If it is really important to you,consequently you can park outside the area that requires stickers.

Yes, it is a must and shouldn't be avoided due to mixed reasons including your indemnity which may be at risk since the parking can be made by any stranger if every one says he considered necessary to have guest to park too! Even the sticker wouldn't solve the problem if a stranger have to park and to commit what he planned! Regulating the parking and to keep just the legit to occupy is a sincere appeal to the inmates for their safety and financial guarantee plus comforts!

My birth certificate and baptismal licence names?

I budge by a name that isn't on my birth card. However, it is on my baptismal certificate and throughout my enthusiasm and school race refer to my name as the one surrounded by my baptismal certificate, which i approaching and am accustomed to. i actually use the birth permit name as a middle signature. for example: roger [baptismal] paul [birth certificate] then mother's maiden and after last autograph. --those are just example name by the way..heh. my baptismal pass has the full cross that i would like to enjoy. college apps are around the corner and i'm confused on what to put for my name. no one's ever really call me by my birth certificate identify except for a doctor.

Answers: your birth name is your endorsed name the if you acquire the school to step with the bap. nickname and they put that on your dip. when you go to a chore and show your social security card and diploma the name don't match that diploma isn't yours know what i penny-pinching.

I have a friend that did indistinguishable as you.when he filled out forms he would put the baptize he wanted to budge by in quotation grades ...example. John "Paul" Jones. That way the personage reading it will know what to call him.

You can also petition the court...or wallet for a name conversion to make it doesn`t matter what you want.

You should go by the mark that is lawful, which is your birth name on your authorization and social security card.

What do you think the president would say-so if i asked him why marijuana is illegal?

Answers: he'd choke on his doobie & say-so, "It IS??"

He would say..I can't charge taxes on that if you can GROW your own.
LOL AM I RIGHT? HEL* YES!!!

He'd utter you're hiding weapons of mass destruction surrounded by your bong.

He'd say that you're entitled to your evaluation.

People elected legislatures who voted it that passageway.

2 many apt answers already...
Bush is clueless, & would say...

"Marijuana is discouraging for you.
Bad people use it.
Marijuana is iffy."

He'd say that a majority of adjectives voters, represented by their senators and representatives, want and support the laws that trademark marijuana possesion illegal.

The President isn't to blame for ruining your fun. Its your mom, dad, your neighbors and the empire down the street. Its the people whose duty money pays for the rehab centers and the ambulances and the jail cell that drug abusers end up within.

Try talking to those populace about why they've ruined your fun.

And if he's honest?
It would cart the profit away that the government make

Choco nailed the argument. But if you want my 2 cents...

He would giggle slightly remembering his troubled youth of prep schools and misspent college time. Then sturnly he would look at the cameras documenting the event, and inform you that drugs are addicitive. That your addiction fuels the financial goals of others wage wars and mistreating others. That a strip was drawn to which drugs be truely harmful, and to put a bet on off from that file would be to endanger that which brought us to the present.

Just because something is less injurious, does not make it right. Only contained by the rare cases of things similar to alcohol and tobacco, evils of which this country had founded it's discount, had exceptions be made. Precident overrides principle in frequent cases, and in writing the law that legalized alcohol and tobacco, it did as well.

The sound out you should be asking is, why do you find it necessary to bother the commander & chief on something so trivial while at hand is so much on his plate?

He would say, and correctly so:

- that the directive relfects the will of the voting public,
- and that he if anyone should know that one has to stop person stoned in lay down to advance any design politically,
- so far for the last 70 years, 100s of millions of marijuana users own not been competent to organize effectively politically despite evidence they would succeed because they own chose to prefer remaining stoned and accept a small decriminalized risk over not being stoned and doing the sturdy work of political change.

want an example? look surrounded by the mirror :)

Seriously, this is such an FAQ here it is asked every hour. Use the search box on this page and contact the stoned guys (almost other a guy for some reason it seems) that asked like peas in a pod question as you and attain organized.

I bet if you contact them at all you will only share whiny stories about how someone else would do the work for your benefit and afterwards share tips about smoking.

And I am one who would support you if you be organized, but no way I am going to invest contained by participating politically if you can't get out near and produce your own interested and effective leaders.

So attain to it and kwitcherbitchen.

More Questions and Answers:
[774] - [573] - [1597] - [411] - [668] - [237] - [903] - [1986] - [807] - [2322] - [97] - [125] - [1973] - [202] - [1434] - [1028] - [699] - [823] - [898] - [2136]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: