Law Questions and Answers

What is the difference between shooting someone to save other lives and "waterboarding",?

that for one minute give the sense of drowning?

COLORADO SPRINGS, Dec. 10 -- A heavily armed man who killed four young-looking people at a missionary training center and a church Sunday apparently intended to gun down masses more victims before he be shot by a former police officer who was serving as a volunteer shelter guard.

I believe the terrorist and the gun man lost their human rights when they started to kill others.

Answers: You don't see the difference between shooting somebody who is actively bloodbath other people and torturing a terrorist SUSPECT for information that he MAY enjoy?

I don't think anybody would own a problem with torturing somebody who be KNOWN to know the location of a bomb or such. It is more using torture as a fishing expedition that bothers people.

When you waterboard someone, they're not inert.

When SKM was waterboarded to engender him reveal the location of an upcoming attack, and the location of Pearls body, he was - when it be over - still alive and healthy.(Unlike Daniel Pearl after he beheaded him for the cameras)

What you hold to remember about the waterboarding fuss is that - to a Liberal - Americans are inherantly worth smaller quantity than other people.

So if you're be going to to a terrorist in instruct to save the lives of Americans, that's not a disinterested deal, because they believe that the terrorists rights are more significant than Americans lives.

To David: SKM - and the other two people the CIA waterboarded" - be not "suspected" of being terrorists. They *were* terrorists, and be boasting and bragging about their feat. The waterboarding of SKM occurred when he amenably boasted to the interrogators that an operation was currently running and that they'd never find out where on earth in time to stop it. When they waterboarded him and he told them where on earth it was, they stopped it.

Waterboarding and other torture technique (and I do agree that it is torture) wasn't used to gain normal type information almost things that had happen, or to get evidence that could be used against ancestors. It was used ONLY when the interrogators have strong reason to believe that here was an ONGOING operation that the terrorist they be questioning could impart them information about to agree to them stop it BEFORE people get killed.

Richard

Water boarding is used within people "suspected" of mortal terrorists. A shooting is done to someone currently holding a gun where no other opportunity exists.

rickinnocal - The question be about hose boarding in standard and not about a specific skin you have approved to justify. Apparently the ends prove right the means to you and as such we should adjectives simply accept that and allow torture of ANY suspect that intends to hurt US citizens. Let us adjectives hope we are never the victim of mistaken identity...

rickinnocal - You also articulate "terrorists rights are more important than Americans lives". Well, it's a nouns bite and probably makes you get the impression better. I feel that the obligation to respect the laws WE passed at US and international level need to be respected. When we violate our own law we are no better than the terrorists we seek to trouncing.

no. they didn't lose their human rights...that's what's supposed to be great about human rights...

...they're guaranteed for adjectives... it's an unwritten code about how expensive human life is to adjectives of us.

When someone doesn't value human time... that's when we show our humanity... to treat that person approaching a human...despite their lack of human worthiness.

we are good individuals... we have respect for adjectives human life. That's what make America great and better than others... we respect all human vivacity...

How to set right the Govt Records of a property which has be fradulently sold ?

One of my friends inherited property have been just this minute sold fraudulently by a criminal using forgery photographs and records. The properties are within the name of his father who died long subsidise. Now the entire duping has come to lighting. My friend has also launch a Police complaint. Now what is the way for him get hold of the official store set right once again?

Answers: First, he is going to need a legal representative that works with actual estate matters. Secondly, it is not possible he will be able to correct the text until the fraud is proven. Right now it's in recent times a claim.

If a property is fradulently sold and registered it by forged photographs and documents, you can get matching set it right by making a representation to the Registrar for cancelling the registration. However, yuou own to prove the fraud conclusively.

Based on the different ways an employee can commit fraud?

by working at a dosh register, describe how a fraud investigator can be proactive.

Answers: Accounting fraud habits give the impression of being to be popping up everywhere these days. Many small business owners surface that their companies are immune to accounting fraud for two basic reason: they don't have oodles employees, and the ones who operate with money are usually close to the owners. But regardless of size, any business is adjectives to fraudulent activities by team. You may want to read the full page about false bookkeeping at the source below:

Put a camera above the register.

Does an intoxicated driver have a basis of action beneath Missouri law when public house owner allows him to drive home?

Does an intoxicated driver have a lead to of action beneath Missouri law against a tavern owner if the intoxicated driver, after self served alcohol by the tavern owner or employee who know or should have prearranged that the driver was intoxicated, is involved within an automobile accident surrounded by which only the intoxicated driver himself is injured?

Answers: The drunk driver probably doesn't hold a cause of performance, but, depending on what the state dram shop laws articulate, a person who is hit by the drunk driver might enjoy causes of act against both the drunk driver and the server of the alcohol.

Man, I hope not. The tavern owner did not "let" the person drive. They are pretty much unqualified to prevent someone from driving.

People that try this "it can't be my fault, they permit me" should be treated like the children they profess to be. If the tavern owner is responsible, it ability the driver is not. As such, the driver should lose the privilege to drive, to drink, consent to sex, get married or do any other item that requires that a person be an grown. They are admitting they are unqualified to think for themselves.

Since when is it someone else's imperfection for the decisions I or you engender for that matter.

If someone is not grown enough to appropriate responsibility for their actions but want to blame someone else- put them within diapers where they belong.

I hope not. It is the drinkers responsibility to know when to quit drinking. The bartender isn't his mother.

He wants to take responsibility for his own dealing. "The Devil Made Me Do It" is not a legal defense.

How can you have a contract signed ...?

How can you own a contract signed in front of a notary surrounded by France without the party been within physically as the parties currently resides surrounded by the UK and USA

Answers: AMerican embassy can notarize. Parties MUST be present in decree for a notary to be valid. You may need to execute powers of atty for this transaction.

Parties notarize where on earth they live and forward to the next get-together and notary.

in some countries and situations yo u can do it by proxy.ie someone acting surrounded by your stead.

marriages hold been done this process believe it or not

If a person is qualified as any a solicitor or a barrister what do they have to do to emmigrate to canda or

USA?
Would they hold to do another degree contained by that countries law when they take there?

Answers: In Canada you would own to get your LL.B and article for one year formerly being call to the bar. Although our common-law is similar to the UK, it is still different and you enjoy to learn this.

if you come to the UK you would most likely be told to lug a degree surrounded by and English college of lessor quality. in recent times because they feel if it be not gotten in the UK it can't possibly be any apposite.

i have a post grads level in psychology from the USA. when i go to see about work i be told to get a amount here first even though it was far below what i be already qualified in.

i fixed not start a second carear because of it

Can a lawyer contained by Ontario help a friend sue someone on his own time?

My friend is person threatened with court from her ex's attorney, who happens to be his outmoded friend from school. The legal representative is using his personal email for their exchanges, even though he works for a law firm. It's transparent he's doing this work for free on behalf of his "friend". Shouldn't he be using his work email address for his threats? Or do you think he's afraid of his bosses finding out what he's doing?

Answers: Up to his employer; lawyer have greatly of leeway to exploit.

lawyers can afford away thier time as they chose. it is called pro bono work. His boss may not close to the idea of Him doing pro bono on his time but rightfully he can do that if he wishes. profesionally it could cause him problems depending on how his associates consistency about how he is using his time. This is possibly why he is using private email.

Legal question?

no previous criminal journal prior to moving to small community and married the town golden boy. now hold been arrested and facing serious charges due to his community and financial influence. fabricated and false charges. i hail as for help and i carry arrested,jailed,finewd,etc.he ...please help. he and the local da and police are best friends and grew up together.

Answers: I would move and take the hell out of there. Once you're former this current issue, your problems should go away provided you stay away from that place and it's apposite ol' boy network.

Lawyer up, and do it right presently. Call IA (Internal Affairs), and seriously consider moving. Little corrupt places like that will go and get you imprisoned, or worse.

Unemployment?

I filed an laying-off claim at the end of november, I recieved the information within the mail on how much I would attain and for how long I would get it. I call "marvin" at the time I was told to telephone call. I got a note in the e-mail yesterday and it had question about a prievious employer (not the employer that fired me) I answered the question and mailed the form put money on. Today i called the severance agency and they told me that they were making a determination on whether i would recieve my paychecks or not. Has this ever happen to anyone and if so what did it mean? Did you still bring back unemloyment?

Answers: Whether you are eligible for unemployment benefits depends upon abundant things. They will determine who you were working for during the benefits-eligible time, how longed you worked, how much you made in net and why you are no longer employeed by them.

You usually have to be employed 17 weeks surrounded by an eligibility period to collect anything. Then, they consider why you not here. If you quit the job, you won't receive benefits. If you were fired, you won't attain benefits. Unemployment compensation is for people who hold left a brief through no fault of their own...approaching being out of work or your job position individual done away with.

So, purely continue to donate them what they need...they will determine eligibility.

Other factor are also considered..such as the company may dispute and say you moved out voluntarily...in which suitcase, you wouldn't be eligible. You may have to provide proof that you be laid off..

If you be let budge for cause by the prior employer who is confrontational the claim and don't have plenty time on the last post you left for a stand alond claim of u/e, you may be denied. They necessitate both jobs to qualify for you to hold enough time for a claim to be approved; or have need of the income from teh first job to set the amount you willl catch.

Why do people grain that they have the right to abuse/neglect an animal???

Isn't it adjectives sense that if you don't want to take protection of an animal you shouldn't have one!?!?!?!?

Answers: I've never unspoken how anyone could believe they had a right to invective anything, human or animal. Generally, however, such people are extremely insecure and normally mentally unstable. The only piece I can do is report offenders when I see them and rescue what animals I can.

some folks think of their pets like way they expect of their kids toys... some object contained by the way.. getting kicked and stepped on... messing up the house...

they never come up with of it as an animal.

if you're not going to take diligence of your pet, then don't bring back a pet. someone will love the animal and treat it very okay.

Yeah that's just not cool!! It's cruel.

More Questions and Answers:
[756] - [2417] - [1714] - [2565] - [2127] - [355] - [441] - [1615] - [690] - [983] - [2526] - [964] - [768] - [464] - [986] - [2202] - [401] - [1590] - [1994] - [1480]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: