Law Questions and Answers
Do prosecutors generally deceit in writ to gain a prosecution?
From what I have see on documentaries, they often formulate claims they are not absolutely sure of, even when someone's energy is on the line. I consider that lying. What almost you?Answers: They don't lie any more than the defense attorney's that represent some of the most dispicible criminals on the planet . It's the instrument our sytem works for better or worse.
The answer to your question is no. Prosecutors do not "generally" recline in command to gain a conviction. I am not naive ample to believe that there are not some out in that that will lie, but to drain it down to general jargon, no..most prosecutors don't lie to gain convictions.
As a personality who has be a prosecutor for 3 years, I can tell you unequivocally, that I enjoy never lied in establish to gain a conviction. Most criminals do all you necessitate to convict them. My job is to place in the past the jury all nouns and evidence and let them wish the case.
Awe man the jury don't really know what really go on .Lol
none of them have had a felony and be on the other side..
Fed a nice lunch..the whole show is set up from the start.
Just a moral ol' boy.
Is It Cruel and Unusual Punishment For police to make you Urinate In Your pant, Not let you use the Bathroom?
I lately got In Trouble For a Minor AI Charge (Was Questioned Without any rights read), A friend Of Mine be Driving I was In the Passagers side. And When I get there I wait for 4 hours to Use the Bathroom I was In The floor Crying out In Pain and Begging to run to the bathroom and They would not have My Arresting Office bring me, Now I seem To Have Really Bad Pains In My Stomach and Its sturdy for me to go to the bathroom, Not Only That But Anouther individual came In And Was Forced to Urinate surrounded by His Pants as All The rest Of The Officers Stood around Laughing at him and wouldn't take him to the bathroom any, And This was adjectives Before They Even Processed any paper work, This be My First offense So I don't Understand The law All I know Is in a minute I have a huge Doctor bill because of an Apparent problem? So Is This Considered Cruel And Unusual Punishment To receive People On AI Charges Use the Bathroom In There pants Or clear them Hold It in for hours and Hours?Answers: Cruel but not unusual.
You're best bet is to influence out of trouble in the adjectives.
You're rights are only as upright as your ability to remuneration for legal representation.
. . . typical PIGS!!!
INeed to know my rights,paid 2 noble towards car which cost 3,500late partner folks wont give me vehicle?
My partner and I bought the car surrounded by June I paid 2 splendid towards it and he borrowed the remainder from a credit union. Tragically my partner passed away within September, he had be banned from driving but be irate that his father was driving our motor. Since his passing I hold tried to get the vehicle back but own constantly been lied to, until friday evening when I asked for it to be brought over so I can deal in it and pay spinal column my step-dad whom I borrowed the 2 grand from, I be told he was using it as it be saving him lb20 a week, I dont aspiration to make a profit from the saloon I just want to recompense my step-dad. His father then said his own coupé had broken down and that he would return the vehicle this Sunday morning. He did come round (in his own car) and refused to return the motor as he said he has spoken to a friend who have legal know-how and has be advised to save the car to protect his own financial interest? Myself and the kids are missing my partner unpleasantly especially at this time,Thanks,xAnswers: It is obvious to me that you can show an equitable interest surrounded by the vehicle and on production of the receipt for the lb2000 it proves that you own a share in the vehicle.
Talk to a solicitor, but I focus equity law might be the answer here.
Good luck.
To squirrel away yourself all this aggravation, at a time when you really don't entail it, get a solicitors proposal.
Be guided by what he/she tells you.
It might be that a communiqué from them will do the trick.
For peace accept veracity. If the car be in your partners' dub, it was his. Now that he is unconscious, it passes to his subsequent of kin...his parents, or his actual blood child if any. As a non-spouse, you have no right to inherit, so you can't claim the motor. You are out the money, as no one living owes you anything.not the sports car, not the money, and not anything else.
Questions about autopsies (in US)?
I own no idea if this is even the correct forum within which to ask but here goes...If a nearest and dearest member dies and an autopsy is REQUIRED by imperative, who pays? Is it covered by taxpayers (if it was perform by the county coroner)? Or would the family be forced to repay for the autopsy (what if that person be estranged from there family)?
Also, does anyone know if that personage was estranged from household and the family member did not claim the body, who would claim the body and who would pay to enjoy it buried/cremated, etc?
Are there any polite books or websites that cover topics like this? I don't enjoy a family branch about to miss away, I'm trying to get facts for a storyline for a storybook story.
Thanks!!!
Answers: There is no cost to the family for an autopsy that is to say ordered by the Medical Examiner. The county where the loss occurred will wages for the autopsy expenses and will be reimbursed by the county of the decedent’s residence.
If a family requests a private autopsy, they would be responsible for paying for it.
Here's a private co. that charges $2-3,000 for an autopsy!
http://www.1800autopsy.com/article.html?...
Unclaimed bodies are any buried in county section of the cemetary called "paupers field" or they are sometimes used for training purposes contained by medical schools.
In the US of A the taxpayers reward & pay & compensate & pay - - - - -
http://www.medicinenet.com/autopsy/page5...
"""Who pays for autopsies?
Presently, nearby is no direct funding to hospitals or doctors for autopsies. As part of the federal government's Medicare funding to hospitals, reimbursement for autopsies is abstractly included in fixed payments that hospitals receive. Thus, the federal organization contends that it is paying for autopsies. Since these funds are not specifically earmarked for autopsies, they may not conquer the pathology department or pathologist. Managed care organization consider the autopsy to be built into their hospital contracts. However, these organizations own stated that they are willing to reimburse for autopsies if and when they are convinced of their pro. Ultimately, the family may more repeatedly be called upon to engage the cost of the autopsy.
In our litigation-oriented society, a growing proportion of private-pay autopsies are motivated by distrust, anger, and a desire to sue the potentially responsible physician(s) and hospital. Several groups of pathologists and business persons throughout the country are marketing their autopsy services through direct communication, newspapers, funeral homes, and online. Whether the standard and objectivity of these private autopsies will match those of broad hospitals and academic medical centers remains to be determined."""
Wish I could throw more at you but it is late///
Peace... o o o p p o o p p o o
If the autopsy is required by canon, then the County or State pays the tab.
If not a soul claims the body, the County will bury the person, again at the taxpayer expense.
My wife is a nurse at a VA Hospital. One of the dated vets passed away and she be asked to contact the next of kin. The prehistoric man's records indicated a sister. She call and the sister told her she would not claim the body, she could not afford to travel to the hospital or ship the body and bury him. My wife then asked what she needed to do with her brother's personal effects, his year frail pickup truck, and the several thousand dollars in his forgiving bank picture. Suddenly, dear old sis, could take home the trip after all. If the sister within this case have refused to claim the body, the VA would own buried the old Vet. Of course, if that have happened, sis would not enjoy been competent to claim the money or the truck.
The coroner pays for the autopsies.
The coroner will also claim and dispose of unclaimed bodies at the department's expense.
My sister owes money?
I helped her to compensate check, now I want my money, she is so., that I enjoy to be careful to request for money.I did not write loan her money on the check, I did not variety contract. If she refuse to retribution, how can I prove she owe me money? The check is signed by me.
If everything fail, what permitted action I can steal? go to collection agency?
She is foreigner, she is departure Jan. 6, If I go to small claim court, will it be too in arrears? or call attorney? or telephone call immigration office?
Answers: Unfortunatley you loaned her the money, she is line maybe you could stir to Judge Judy...
She is your sister for GOD SAKE!
If you can wait til she pays you, specifically better , but if you really need money, converse to her nicely...ask her to payment you back if ever she cant wage take the consequences, probably you are the first one who will recognize if she is in trouble..
Dont verbs some other ways that money will come to you...
There is no joy for you Joy Joy. . .
You've no lawful contract. Hopefully, your sister will not try to beat her own brother out of your money. If she doesn't clear up the only recourse you own is. . ., tell mommy.
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES OF 1860-1865??? please help?
I own to do an essay for government class on Abraham Lincoln and the Checks and Balances of the branches of affairs of state during his presidency. I have to find 2 earth-shattering Supreme Court cases from 1860-1865 and write about them.Please agree to me know if you know an important luggage. Thanks.
Answers: Look for the Prize cases and the Ex Parte Milligan decisions. One deal with the War Poewrs feat and the other one dealt next to the presidential suspension of haebas corpus and ordering warring law.
During the Civil War, the Court issued two significant opinion interpreting the war powers. In the Prize Cases (1863), the Court on a 5 to 4 vote upheld President Lincoln's demand blockading southern ports--even though the order be issues prior to a formal declaration of period of war on the Rebel states by Congress. The Court found Lincoln's action authorized by a 1795 Act allowing the President to phone up out troops to suppress an insurrection. The dissenters argued the President's action be unconstitutional, as a blockade is quite different that an doings merely directed at those participating in an insurrection. Three years subsequently, in Ex Parte Milligan, the Court found unconstitutional Lincoln's decree authorizing trial by a military tribunal of Lambdin P. Milligan, an Indiana lawyer accuse of stirring up support for the Confederacy. The Court ruled that civilians must be tried in civilian courts, even during time of time of war, so long at least as the civilian courts are sympathetic and operating. The Court also found the President lacked authority to allege martial directive in Indiana. Four concurring justices argued that even though the President did not hold the power to order a military trial of Milligan contained by the absence of congressional achievement, the power to authorize use of military tribunals did reside in Congress lower than its war power.
Here is a cooperation to an index of landmark cases, arranged by topic. Take a look and see if you can find something that you can use--
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cases/t...
Also--think just about the Dred Scott decision of 1857 and how Lincoln's management led to the 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution.
Here's a apposite one
John Catron (January 7, 1786 – May 30, 1865) was an American jurist who served as a Supreme Court even-handedness from 1837 to 1865.
Little is known of Catron's precipitate life, but he served within the War of 1812 under Andrew Jackson. He be admitted to the Tennessee railing in 1815 and established a lands law practice within Nashville in 1818. He served on the Tennessee Supreme Court of Errors and Appeals from 1824 until 1834, anyone elevated to Chief Justice of that court in 1831. In 1834, the state legislature abolish the chief justice position, and Catron retired and returned to private practice. During the see of 1836, Catron directed Martin Van Buren's presidential campaign contained by Tennessee.
Congress expanded the United States Supreme Court from seven to nine members surrounded by 1836, allowing Andrew Jackson to name two bright justices. Jackson nominated Catron on March 3, 1837, his last full time in department, and the Senate confirmed Catron five days later.
Catron served as an associate even-handedness until his death within 1865 at age 79. Though not known to be a slaveholder himself, Catron supported slavery and sided next to the majority in the Dred Scott v. Sandford bag. However, he opposed secession and urged Tennessee to remain with the Union, ultimately human being forced to leave the state and run up permanent residence within Washington, DC, after the state seceded.
Upon Catron's loss in 1865, Congress eliminate his seat from the Court, departing the Supreme Court with nine chairs. Catron is interred at Nashville's Mount Olivet Cemetery.
Is it legal to wear bulletproof vest inside the plane?
Answers: Since Kevlar is made of a synthetic fiber, I don't believe it would set rotten any alarms at the airport. If you were military or a federal agent you would probably already know the answer. So I'm going to assume you are neither and don't even hold a vest. The idea that you would even call for one on a plane is ludicrous. You are more likely to win struck by lightning or win the lottery than get shot by someone while on a plane. If you appear to be on a plane where:
1. Someone be able to draw from a gun on a plane.
2. That person is inclined to actually discharge it. You might as ably kiss your behind goodbye anyway because that plane is going down. So unless your vest doubles as a parachute and possibly triples as a flotation device, you are better rotten taking the bullet anyway.
Yeah, and don't forget your crash helmet. Why would you want to? I bet it'd be hot and uncomfortable.
Infringement question for downloading a team game!?
I have a copy of beckon of duty 4 for PS3 and my friend said i own the license to copy and use it for my own use, so i use bitlord to download it for PC and i get an email from comcast (my service provider) wise saying EA games contacted them telling them i broke copyright law and such. well they dont know i hold a copy of the game for a different console. Also, if that doesn't conveyance the fact what will occur? will i be fined or something? i think if i get the game for PS3 it wouldnt business if i got for PC to play near a friend.ALSO - I stopped downloading the game at 0.9% basis i decided not to draw from it but didnt remove it from the loaded for a couple days, i just kept it on hold-up, does that matter?
Thanks.
Answers: No you don't obtain to download a copy of a game a short time ago because you already own a version.
Think of it this route. Suppose you were walking out of a music store near an armload of un-paid-for music CDs. Could you protest to the store owner that you had previously bought a disk and these be just "spares" for you to use at home. It is still nouns! buying one CD does not offer you permission to pocket more at a later time.
You probably hold a reasonable right to clear a copy, if it is made from the disk you already own, for your personal use. A download is not a copy of the disk you already own, however similar it might be.
The end-user license your friend refered to applies only to the copy you purchased for your PS3. It does not cover copying that activity to other consoles. One of the earlier answers said that it is trial as long as you don't make money bad of it...that is false. The simple feat of copying it, or attempting to copyit, is copyright infringement. It does not matter whether or not you made any money by selling it. You're probably looking at federal fines of at lowest $5,000 if not more. Theorhetically you could also be sent to federal prison for it.
Follow Up Question to Is it illegal to withhold money for religious reason?
My reason for wanting my own money is/was to buy An XMAS grant. My sister, who is a Jehovah's Witness denied me my right to buy myself an XMAS gift because of her non holiday celebrate beliefs. And I feel that isn't right. Is what she is doing against the law? She has the right to deny me money bur for her religious beliefs? I would deliberate that wouldn't be legal but I am not sure.For more info, see my artistic question here :
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/;_ylc=...
Answers: There seem little evidence that the payee is motivated by her own religious sensibilities.
By contrast, it seems secular and prudent to be skeptical of the notion of 'buying oneself a gift' when one have a pattern of financial irresponsibility. It would come across that the payee would have little difficulty persuading any oversight agency that she be acting in the best interests of the information holder.
What seems more troubling is the personality of the arrangement to allow the questioner to continue to qualify for his assistance. The questioner should probably discuss with the payee how he (and she) can most effectively grip to government regulations concerning qualify for the assistance received.
Learn more:
http://watchtower.org/e/20031208a/articl...
Sue her for it in the worst baggage scenario. Under my understanding it's YOUR money. She is the payee of your money. If she does not allow you to own your money she has essentially stolen from you and to be exact called aggravated burglary. I don't care if you considered necessary your money to buy a buddah wearing a stocking hat and a star of david necklace. Her religious beliefs enjoy nothing to do next to it. Tell her you demand YOUR money or you will embezzle her to COURT for it.
Edit: It sounds to me you need a alien guardian because your sister is taking advantage of you. Putting your money contained by her account is seriously bogus. I infer you need a non-family beneficiary to become your guardian/payee of your SS checks. My wife currently handles adjectives the money we make. But if I wish to get an X-mas offering I'm sure she wouldn't attempt to stop me, and she doesn't have her own picture which I do not have access to. I despise to say it but you necessitate to do the following: Either A) Get a non-family member to abet handle your money (I'm sure there's various a social service in the nouns that can help you beside getting a non-family member to be your payee) or B) Learn to pedal your money. You seem to be a smart creature capable of research to manage your finances. Take some classes! I'm sure there's some to be have by a social service in your nouns. What she is doing is just down right wrong. Since she is religious I don`t know point her nose surrounded by the bible where it dialogue about stealing from the poor and defenseless and what G-d think about that. Might modify her tune real rapid.
If she is the asigned care taker it is Her choice how it is handle. If you have a problem next to it, try to get another caretaker. She have the burden of taking care of you, she also have the Right to decide what's best.
Is it illegal to withhold money for religious reason?
I receive Social Security and someone else IE my Sister has receive my payments. I have to enjoy a payee to receive my money or else I wouldn't acquire any. I am being denied my own money because of what I want to spend it on. My sister is denying it because of her religious beliefs. KEYWORDS : her religious beliefs. Is that forbidden?Answers: I have bookish that there are two sides to every story so I want some details.
1) How old are you? Are you a minor and your sister is responsible for your watchfulness and needs?
2) Knowing that she is Jehovah Witness religious conviction opposed to indisputable celebrations-why did you even mention Christmas present for yourself as part of your request for money?
3) How is your relationship near her other wise? Are nearby frequent disputes about that money? Is money the solely area of conflict or are at hand other issues that are in conflict too?
If you are a minor beneath the guardianship of your sister the money is not really yours-it is hers to provide for your needs first and foremost beside your "wants" being subjected to her discretion and decision.
Declaring that you wanted to buy yourself a "Christmas present" may enjoy been see as disrespect towards her and her religious practices. You did not say what the item be that you wished to purchase. It may not own been age appropriate-or potentially disadvantageous in her view.
If this is an isolated incident-she usually does give you money to buy things next just don't antagonize her in the order of a holiday in the adjectives.
If there is a shape of behavior-with her always maxim no to your request on other occasions-then keep a illegal written record and if you also enjoy a Social Service worker assigned to your case share that near her. She may have some influence as to how you are being treated. Perhaps ardent neglect?
You hold to be able to prove it. If she is smart, she will claim something else, resembling she doesn't have it or something.
If YOU are prudent, you will ask for it again and not mention what you intend to spend it on, on sort of a "don't ask, don't tell" philosophy.
It adjectives depends on:
1. why she is your payee (why do you need to enjoy a payee in the first place)
2. what her religious reason are.
If you tell us these two things we can guide you.
If she is the asigned concern taker it is Her choice how it is handled. If you hold a problem with it, try to catch another caretaker. She has the burden of taking safekeeping of you, she also has the Right to prefer what's best.
More Questions and Answers:
[2517] - [2177] - [814] - [2044] - [279] - [210] - [185] - [2076] - [2203] - [273] - [143] - [879] - [354] - [876] - [1817] - [373] - [296] - [567] - [1985] - [203]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: