Law Questions and Answers

Is 14 a legal working age as a bank clerk for a supermarket in california sacramento?

Is 14 a legalized working age as a cashier at a supermarket within california sacramento because i was wondering. They read out that a legal working age is 14 but i dont know if a 14 year feeble can be a cashier.
Answers: Yes, age 14 is endorsed to be permitted to work as a supermarket cashier because this is not an occupation excluded from the application of Subpart C of Part 570 of Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth within Section 570.33 and paragraph (b) of Section 570.34 thereof.

*/End of Line.
well it depends if they supply alchohol you cannot and also many require other parts to the duty that would also require you to be over 18 because as a cashier you could responsable for other things that require person over 18 like use of undisputed equotment (like a baler)

Trespassing order?

I be skating at the local mall garage and the payment gave my friend and I a trespassing demand. We were longboarding trying to form down the ramps, which sucked and very soon I regret even going there.

Now, what is this trespassing lay down and does it prevent me from going to this mall? When is it lift and is it considered a felony? Will my college hear about this?
Answers: A trespassing demand is a notice that if violated renders you subject to cost for "defiant trespass." You may use the precinct for shopping, but you may not use it for skating.

Definition of "defiant trespasser" 18 Consolidated Penna. Statutes, § 3503 (b) Defiant trespasser.--
(1) A party commits an offense if, knowing that he is
not licensed or privileged to do so, he enters or remains within any place as to which notice against trespass is given by:
(i) actual communication to the performer;
(ii) posting in a bearing prescribed by law or
believably likely to come to the attention of intruders;
(iii) fencing or other coop manifestly designed
to exclude intruders;
(iv) notices posted surrounded by a manner prescribed by statute or reasonably probable to come to the person's attention at
each entrance of academy grounds that visitors are
prohibited lacking authorization from a designated
school, center or program sanctioned; or
(v) an actual communication to the actor to resign from
school grounds as communicated by a academy, center or program official, member of staff or agent or a law enforcement officer.
(2) Except as provided contained by paragraph (1)(v), an offense
under this subsection constitutes a misdemeanor of the third amount if the offender defy an order to head off personally communicated to him by the owner of the premises or other authorized party. An offense under paragraph (1)(v) constitutes a misdemeanor of the first level. Otherwise it is a summary offense.


My answer is: no, it won't keep you from going to the shopping precinct to go shopping. However, if warranty catches you skating again, you are probable to be prosecuted. No, your college will not hear about it.
A "no trespassing" direct is an officially record warning not to dance onto a particular piece of private property. Trespassing is a misdemeanor and the property owner is free to sanction you from the property for life if he so chooses, and that alert simply means not to be in motion back in that.

Why do they print "In God we trust" text on money?


Answers: Because Congress said so, for no moral reason. It is arguably a infringement of the establishment of religion clause in the Constitution, but the Supreme Court have not ruled on the matter.
because this country is run by religious wackos.

why is one and the same phrase engraved above the speakers podium at the House of Representatives in D.C. ??? what give or take a few separation of church and state???

at the root of every war contained by the history of mankind is a fool clinging to a gross misinterpretation of his religion.
The whole "King & Queen" entity was purported for thousands of years to be "God Ordained" to maintain people from "rebelling" against the aristocrat order...

When our country come into being...relatives were still used to the model that "God" had a paw in select "leaders..."

So...to appease the religious zealots at the time, and give foreign American citizens that "God Ordained" feeling...

They added that statement to the money to furnish it true "legitimacy" in the eyes of the commoners who still needed to believe that any U.S. President be "God Ordained..."
Why?

Removing the motto "In God We Trust" from American currency would mark the extension of a tradition that began during the Civil War to rescue the country from "the ignominy of heathenism" and be expanded in the 1950s to combat the philosophy of communism.

The target of atheist Michael Newdow's lawsuit is one of plentiful phrases that have be printed on U.S. money since Congress in 1787 authorized the first American one-cent piece to display "Mind Your Business" on the front and "We Are One" on the wager on.

During the early 1800s, "E Pluribus Unum" ("Out of Many, One") be placed on coins by the U. S. Mint, though this was not mandate by law. David Lange, research director of the National Guaranty Corporation (NGC), told Cybercast News Service that the phrase be dropped during the 1830s because the mint director believed it was redundant near "United States of America."

According to the website of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the motto "In God We Trust" was first placed on United States coins "largely because of the increased religious sentiment existing during the Civil War."

While Treasury Secretary Salmon Chase received frequent appeals on the topic, the first was a communication sent on Nov. 13, 1861, by Rev. Mark Watkinson from Ridleyville, Pa., who proposed "the recognition of the Almighty God contained by some form on our coins" even as the nation was one torn apart by internal conflict.

"What if our Republic were not shattered beyond reform?" the Baptist minister asked in his missive. "Would not the antiquaries of succeeding centuries rightly use from our past that we be a heathen nation?"

He then suggested replacing "the goddess of liberty" on U.S. coins beside a design that included an "all-seeing eye, crowned with a radiance; beneath this eye the American flag," as well as the words "God, Liberty, Law."

"This would produce a beautiful coin, to which no possible citizen could raise objections," Watkinson added. "This would relieve us from the ignominy of heathenism. This would place us openly underneath the Divine protection we have individually claimed."

A week later, Chase wrote to James Pollock, director of the Mint at Philadelphia, that "the trust of our general public in God should be declared on our national coins." Therefore, Pollock be instructed to "cause a device to be prepared minus unnecessary delay beside a motto expressing in the fewest and tersest words possible this national admission."

In December of 1863, Pollock submitted designs to Chase for new coins next to the mottoes "Our Country," "Our God" or "God, Our Trust." Chase responded that the phrase should read "In God We Trust," and Congress approved the design on April 22, 1864. Later that year, a two-cent piece became the first U.S. coin to transport the motto.

"Since then, the motto must appear on adjectives silver and gold coins by imperative, this being extended to the underside metal coins which have since replaced the silver issues," Lange of NGC said, even though "no tenet has ever be passed requiring its use on the minor coins (cents and nickels)."

That loophole came into play surrounded by 1883, when Chief Engraver Charles Barber chose to drop "In God We Trust" from his new design for the five-cent piece and bring fund "E Pluribus Unum." "No official observe was made of this correct, nor was in that any public outcry," Lange said.

The next controversy concerning the motto came within 1907, when President Theodore Roosevelt commissioned sculptor Augustus St. Gaudens to prepare new designs for the gold ingots eagle and double eagle, without the words "In God We Trust" because Roosevelt considered it sacrilegious to put the Lord's nickname on something as common as money.

However, when the unmarked coins were released the following year, the public outrage be so great that not only did Congress instruct the motto restored, the Act of May 18, 1908, also made the phrase mandatory on all coins upon which it have previously appeared. "In God We Trust" was later added to the one-cent coin in 1909 and the 10-cent piece contained by 1916.

After 55 years, the motto returned to the nickel in 1938, when the phrase be included among the items specified in a design competition for a exotic coin featuring the imagery of Thomas Jefferson, the third U.S. president, and his home in Monticello, Va.

"This edict was made by the Treasury Department, probably because the motto by later appeared on all of the other current coins," Lange noted, though he added that elected representatives officials probably remembered the incident surrounded by 1907.

'A single man with a determined mind'

While adjectives U.S. coins have carried "In God We Trust" since 1938, the motto be not displayed on paper money -- which be introduced during the Civil War to temporarily replace coins in a metal shortage -- until Matthew Rothert give an offering at a church service in 1953.

As Rothert dropped a bill into the collection plate, he notice that it didn't display the same motto as the coins. He wondered why, especially since daily money had surpassed metal coins as the most adjectives form of U.S. currency.

On Nov. 25, 1953, Rothert sent Treasury Secretary George Humphrey a letter note that people surrounded by foreign countries, even those behind the communist Iron Curtain, be anxious to obtain the currency of the United States of America.

"President Eisenhower puts primary prominence on religion and spiritual values," he wrote. "People abroad, as resourcefully as at home, should see and recognize this prominence on our most popular medium of exchange, our dissertation money."

One of Humphrey's assistants responded to Rothert's letter, suggesting that such an management would best be taken by Congress. Undaunted, Rothert began writing hundreds of junk mail to senators, newspapers and even the president. As word of his struggle grew, he received support from a number of Christian organization.

Eisenhower approved a joint resolution of Congress on July 30, 1956, declare "In God We Trust" the national motto of the United States, and the phrase was first used written money in 1957, when it appeared on the one-dollar silver qualification.

"Through the persistent hard work, flood of letters and speeches made by Matt Rothert, the phrase 'In God We Trust' is in a minute on all broadsheet money currency of the United States," said Aaron Martin on the Arkansas Memory Project website.

"The bill that was passed help keep our confidence alive worldwide, but more importantly, it showed how a single man with a determined mind have the power to change some of the biggest things surrounded by the world," Martin added.
Because this country was founded by Christians! It does not issue that we are the melting pot of the world. That is great and adjectives, but people obligation to remember how this country was founded. I am, by far, not a christian, but I do respect the reality that this country was founded upon christian principles. People spend to much time focusing on trying to devolution this country to match their own beliefs when it really is not prominent what the rest of the country believes, just surrounded by what you believe. It is all newly a simple set of rules that respect each other. Who care that we have that on our money, does it spend any differently next to or without those words?

People parley about seperation of church and state, but if you really look into what this finances, it was expected to keep the state out of the church, not the church out of the state.
Knee-jerk response surrounded by the early 1950s to communism, by the christians.

The christians saw this as an opportunity to threaten the secular foundations of the American political system: and they have be right.
A few years ago when this nation was created by men and woman who go to war against England. A lavish jewish bussiness man came to the aid of this nation and give his vast opulence to this nation. This was a result of Gods Mercy. When several of the founding fathers give all they have and many in attendance lives to boot that was also a result of God mercy. When against adjectives odds this nation servived again and again against adjectives odds, That be Gods grace.
This nation above all nation formed on the face of the top soil has a large amount to be thankful for. We are not ultimate. We are not smarter then other nation. We actually single have one great item that makes us different consequently other nations. We are blessed next to men and woman who are praying around the clock for us. That may seem resembling a small thing to you. But I sure can use prayer.
So whey do we trust God. Us that know God know he can be trusted. Many folks can tell you of great accounts of Gods loyalty. God alone can be trusted. And that money is Gods alone.
The foundation of this country and the source of all freedoms come from the creator.

This country is founded on the belief that adjectives rights come from a source above all powers on floor and that those rights may not be taken away by any power on earth. Those rights are given directly to the populace and the people grant the power to the government to protect those rights.

We pledge to respectively other to respect and defend those rights. We lone trust those rights to God and not to any other power not even our government.

We are the simply country in the world that is to say based on the belief that rights are from God directly to the society and for this reason we hold found favor with God and own been given so frequent blessings.

Those that do not believe in God should thank those that do for protecting their rights. Those that do not believe contained by God should encourage those that do to stand by the belief that adjectives rights also are given to those that do not believe. If this is not true then the majority would enjoy all rights and since the majority believe within God it could be assumed that those that believe in God hold the power to control the political affairs.

The separation of church and state is only true if you believe your rights come to you from beyond the rule or the will of the majority.
yeah what he said

Should gun control be adopted?


Answers: Where own you been for the second 200 years? Don't we have gun control - isn't that what the neocons are upset in the order of?
Gun control = people control

So no! If you give attention to gun control is good you should study this movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYkO_3dZA...

This will shatter that myth for you forever.
Hell no

what so we have no agency to defend ourselves against the criminals be it the police or basically regular old crooks?

would you fairly read about the Lady who be raped beaten and kill with her panties on her chief in a Spackle bucket

or

the woman explaining how the man get that hole in his chest.

besides when I look through my sights my hand don't shake and I hit my target how much more control do you want
We currently have gun control contained by place. One must have a license for concealed military capability permit. A pay for ground check is performed on those wish to purchase guns. And in various states there are spot on types of guns that are banned.

Now... if you are speaking of a bar on guns... you would want to put that in place if you don't fastidiousness about the 2 Amendment and ones right to own arms and protect themselves or their family connections. A ban on guns is a horrible conception. Then I wonder who would be the only ones near them????

One of the reasons our founding father put the 2 Amendment into place was so that our command would not gain all the power. So a dictatorship could not rise. You see... those who enjoy and enjoy freedom, will not consent to that happen.
It's interesting that those areas next to the most gun control have the matchless crime rates.

Who obeys the law? Of course, it's the law-abiding citizen.

I'd rather hold a fully-armed populace of law-abiding citizens than all gund man banned and not knowing who the unpromising guys are. Most officers are against gun control of any description, despite what the press say.

Gun control = all 20 rounds contained by the 5X ring.

Calif Deputy
Yes, there is other gun control. Do you want mad nation or kids having guns??
Fact of the thing is also that people don't want criminals have guns, how do you stop them? I believe that gun owners need to stand up and be responsible for the reality that the laws allow criminals to find guns easily.
Some ask why the statute abiding should be responsible in any process for the actions of others, economically either they are subject to some law, or they see murder and crime all around them, any way, the enjoy to lose a little freedom, is it better to lose freedom from gun weilding criminals, or the political affairs elected by the people???
Guns must be controlled contained by order to prevent the rate of mass killings such as those within schools and malls.

Respondants Motion to Dismiss : DVI (this civil matter, not criminal)?

The Petitioner have since moved out of county
Warranty/Deed records found gone a forwarding P.O. box(they don't live in that county either)
The clerk of court have forwarded a subpoena there
Yet they hold not been "served"
I know of at hand real where on earth abouts (intelius), however cannot find any legal court contained by that records to prove this.
The DVI is 5+ years out-of-date , and it pretty much crumbled there duration in this county because "having" it.
The deem keeps resetting the court date proverb they haven't been "served"
With, outstanding tickets, no D.L. , and sold the house trying to find a channel out of there own "curse" .
These annals are nation wide and enforcible surrounded by and with adjectives states.
Any officer can read records and amount up there authentic MO .
This will be the 3rd court date coming up.
Has anyone been through this ?
Whats the routine on this?
I've never have a violent police report or charge surrounded by my life.
They file and the judge give it to them .
(lol...like ratification out candy)
O'well..Thats life
Answers: DON'T WORRY ,GO TO COURT ,WHEN THEY DON'T SO UP ASK JUDGE TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE.THEN FILE A EX-PARTE( RESTRAINING ORDER) AGAINST THEM AND HAVE IT SERVED ON WHERE THEY REALLY LIVE .

How long does it take to find a restraining order against someone?

I’ve just this minute been acceptance threatening phone calls and text messages about man seriously beaten up or murdered. I get really scared and delete the messages and diverted the calls. I know the ethnic group who are doing this and they know where I live, where on earth I go to university. I don’t know if their mortal serious about this, but I’m not sure what to do, if I be to get a restraining command against them, how could I do this? How long would it take to be put into motion?
Answers: The temporary decree can be signed the same light of day if you complete the paperwork early ample, or usually the next sunshine at the latest.

However, the demand can not be enforced until it is served. This could take a while if the soul is being evasive.

This is usually done at the Clerk of Courts office contained by your local courthouse.
Threatening calls are plenty to get a pro tem protective order. In my town they can issue in a few hours as there is a authority on call 24/7 beside a fax machine at home. The application is sent by fax, the command is issued by fax. Then the cops have to serve the character -- to give him the proclaim. The last bit can lug the most time.

Does shoulder tapping ever work?

For cigarettes, not alcohol. If a personage was walking surrounded by to a convnience store and was asked to buy a pack of cigarettes for a minor, does that ever in reality work?
Answers: If some complete stranger tapped me on the shoulder I'd potential have him/her charged near assault.
no

How do i claim my rights to the HOWARD HUGHES ESTATE?


Answers: Um I would say that you hold to prove that you have birth rights or that you enjoy a legal document that states that you enjoy some rights to the estate. If this is a real grill then you involve to get a attorney and go from in attendance if not the I hope you hold fun try. Happy Holidays
I would say, attain a time machine and jump back almost 30 years to stand in queue with adjectives the other kooks of the time.

Do Americans find it more difficut to deal beside questions of sexuality and GOD than State approved torture?

I lately posed a question about our divine nature (God) and our innate sexual drives. It be removed as being abhorrent. I have read answers to question on the morality of torture which suggest that the American people find this morally fitting. Do Americans (of the USA variety) find issues regarding the State controlled torture of suspects smaller quantity offensive than question on the moraltiy of free sexual expression?
Answers: Not having see your original put somebody through the mill, I can't guess as to why some found it objectionable. However, since only two "reports" are needed to own your question pulled, I don't contemplate that adds up to an avalanche of empirical evidence that USA posters find it tough to agreement with question of sexuality.
Unfortunately, yes...It is sad.

I bought a car 2 years ago and problems...out of warranty already...?

I purchased/financed a 2005 Chevrolet Impala beside 17,000 miles on it back contained by November of 2005. It was fine until more or less 3 months ago when it started giving very distinguishable transmission problems, the horn doesn't nouns loud anymore, it sometimes acts close to it want's to die out when siting idle at a buoyant. The dealer desires to charge me outrageous fees for diagnostics, I went along beside it and they found nothing wrong next to the car! I'm out of warranty and my credit isn't so great, I tried to trade it contained by for something cheaper than the trade in pro of the car but they wouldn't approve the financing. I still owe $17,903 on the coup¨¦.

Is there any other steps I should help yourself to to getting another car?
Help...suggestions would be great.

NO SMART @SS/CARCASTIC ANSWERS EITHER!!!
Answers: Im not one smart here, but the only drive to take your saloon back to a dealership is because of the warranty. If your sports car is out of warranty, take it else where on earth. Of course they are going to charge you huge prices and find nothing.

You involve to find a good local mechanic. Still owing that much you are not likly to receive a trade in, especially near poor credit and high milage. You will if truth be told be lucky to get the amount you owe on it if you put up for sale.

Again, find a local mechanic. If you cant find one, try Sears. They will probably charge a lil more than a mechanic or repair shop, but they are usually pretty good and anyone that they are a chain focused on customer service, you own recourse if they jerk you around.


BTW, hold you tried just an overall tuneup? New battery-operated, spark plugs and wires, fluids flushed and new fluids put surrounded by... You would be surprised what doing those things can do for your car.
you seem to be to be in a bind the principle why this is happening and the bank wont work with you is you are what they bid UPSIDE DOWN the only piece you can do is one of 2 things sell the coup¨¦ in your local rag and take what money you capture to get something else or see if i can bring back you a loan my good friend is a investment banker who gets individuals loans who cannot get loans from any other source and i would be joyful to see if one of the lending companies would work beside you and i am 100% sure one of them will let me know if you want to try you can email through my email it is unfurl and i am 120% serious about this we own a huge laundry list of lend companies and i mean 100's of them if we can gain people near no jobs and on welfare brand current cars i am sure we can help you

permit me know if you are serious and we can help you

Chris R
I don't expect to sound CARCASTIC (is that a pun?) But it sounds to me that you remunerated to much for a plain jane car to initiate with. this could be due to the certainty that you have desperate credit. But hey a lot of relations have impossible credit. You also may have be in to big of a hurry to catch a car and didn't choose a well-mannered sound motor from a reputable car marketer. Now with that said.I own no idea where on earth you live but in Texas near are about 30 jillion loan companies that will work beside bad credit relations to get them contained by a vehicle. The best place to look is in the thrifty nickle. Here it is a free newspaper that lists adjectives kinds of services & point for sale. another place is on the internet...hummm I wonder if you enjoy already done that. And then here is the old tryed and true.stir to a big town drive around for hours looking at car lots and transmit them your situation, sonner or later you will find a peddler that will not let you be in motion untill your driving off surrounded by his car. If this fail I'm sorry, but you might even get lucky while driving around and some rich basturd run into your motor and total it then you will find rich suing his pants past its sell-by date...

More Questions and Answers:
[102] - [447] - [1856] - [1344] - [2305] - [1086] - [2395] - [98] - [1650] - [532] - [1848] - [348] - [1614] - [1426] - [950] - [1553] - [2405] - [461] - [553] - [517]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: