Law Questions and Answers
Liberals have has-been to close our military options within Iraq?
Liberals say that we can't officially use White Phosphorous (or White phosphorous-like compounds) on Iraqi civilians...BUT they are wrong:As long as we just claim that the White Phosphorous we use on Iraqi civilians be ONLY intended for illumination & smoke blind we can use it on them as much as we like...
The justifiably depends on the "stated intention" (as long as we say we have no intention of using WP on civilians, we are legally surrounded by the clear).
Question:
Why do liberals claim that we are not legally necessary in using WP on Iraqi civilians when (in reality) the authority of how we use it is really a non-issue (so long as we adhere to the restraints inside the legal loop holes of "stated intention").
More info of what I'm chitchat about:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallujah%2C...
Answers: Liberal are not surrounded by charge of our military. Our neo-con CIC is responsible for tying soldiers' hands. If you presume the WP thing is ridiculous, research the escalation of force rules.
And what section are you with sir? Willie Peters is a doomed to failure deal for anyone. Those who use label to describe the actions of others read very little of the reality of life.
I'll be ready to bet that the three thumbs down were by those who've never served. Young and inexperienced.
I would articulate stand up for what you believe in! If you find laughed at or picked on next just keep hold of trying don't stay down try again!
Miley Cyrus
Hannah Montana
FAN MAIL ACCEPTED: cyrusm83@YAH00.com
so you think other human beings are lab rats or something?
Don't you watchfulness what your soldiers do and to whom and why?
Well, let's phrase it this way:
If Saddam have used such weapons on civilians, would you own considered it acceptable? Would his rationalizations of have a different 'stated intention' changed either the hurt done to individuals or the (lack of) ethics contained by such an act.
Or do you consider the nouns of such an action to be dependent on who carry it out.
And an addendum on drawing things with a broad brush (and not to Goodwinize the answer or anything): Liberals (of almost adjectives stripes) consider the Holocaust to have be a horrible thing. And almost adjectives conservatives agree. Right and wrong are not always aligned to anything political label one affixes to oneself, but a discreet consideration of what constitutes ethics - on which in attendance are at least a few comprehensive consensus. (and could go on for page and pages and volumes of debate).
If you required to argue that sometimes it is unfortunate (but necessary) for civilians to be harmed or kill in the conduct of time of war (the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki for example), you might be able to craft some sort of a case depending on the objectives to be achieve and the alternative options. Heck, I agree that the atomic bombings at the stop of WWII was a unusual example of a situation where the ends did support the means.
But summing up an already long response, you might want to pilfer a bit of advise from writer/poet Alexander Pope and drink more extremely from the spring of knowledge - look beyond the shallow label of 'liberal' and 'conservative', consider what your ethical tenets are and why you hold them, and at least congratulate yourself for reading through such a long response :).
First of adjectives, does it really matter?
The cooperation you cited leads to a so-called "documentary" which supposedly portrays US helicopters dropping white phosphorous on citizens. Further, the picture shows bodies where the skin of the citizens artificial is burned, but the clothing is intact.
WP burns skin-and clothing. And given enough time, a moment ago about anything it comes contained by contact with.
WP does not hold the delivery system to be deployed within the manner described.
There are plentiful other discrepances in this "documentary" that can be listed-but I digress, don't I? Sorry. I merely required to point out the lack of plausibilty of the documentary.
The liberals (here or abroad) are using this to indirectly name attention to their cause-namely, to end the time of war. By claiming we are unjustified in using WP as a chemical weapon, the impliication is that the US is no better than Saddam Hussein, who regularly used chemical weaponry on the Iraq people. This is designed to build the reasoning for attacking Iraq "for oil" more plausible.
Obviously, if the stated intention for the use of WP is legal, consequently raising this issue is for one reason-what the liberals similar to to call 'raising awareness". However, when it is base on fallacies and fabricated evidence, intelligent ethnic group tend to dismiss such claims as the ennui it is.
Incidentally, I believe the US is party to the hottest protocol of 1980, which prohibits the use of incendiaries on civilian population, but but not a signee and as such, is not subject to the restriction anyway.
Do I have to be an Indian citizen to profile a patent surrounded by India?
I am a US citizen with overseas citizenship to IndiaAnswers: Citizenship is not a factor. However, if you plan to folder in the US too...and your invention be invented in the US, next you probably need to directory in the US first and catch a foreign filing license..which happen automatically if the invention doesnt have nationa financial guarantee implications.
No, and you don't own to file contained by separate countries (that would be craziness). You can file a "PCT application" which protects your rights and priority date in most developed countries.
IRS ILLEGAL???????????? wow?
I heard that income export tax is not supported by ANY law.Can anyone prove or disprove this?
SHOW ME proof.
Thank you.
ALSO, what do you hold to say in the region of this?
Is this crazy?
Thank you :)
Answers: Okay, first, the income tax is allowed and is supported by law. For proof, lug a look at the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which provides:
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from anything source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and minus regard to any sample or enumeration."
The means of calculating the income excise due and owing the government is articulated surrounded by Title 26 of the U.S. Code (also known as the IRS Code). Title 26 is simply too voluminous to include surrounded by this answer, but it is available online and in any tenet library.
Some say that 16th Amendment be unlawfully adopted. I hold heard the reason why this is believed and can only respond that, even if these arguments be correct, the issue is long dead immediately. The income tax is here to stay.
Others right to be heard that Title 26 does not contain a command to pay taxes; to some extent, it merely tells those how to compute the amount of taxes owed. This is a semantic argument, and as noted below, it is inaccurate, but still ancestors argue it.
Title 26, Subtitle A, Chapter 1, Section 1 includes a command to pay income taxes, so I enjoy no idea why folks would right to be heard it doesn't. You can read it yourself at the following site: http://www4.tenet.cornell.edu/uscode/html/...
Further, the IRS Code contains language stating that due fraud and tax evasion are unauthorized (USC Title 26, Sec. 7201 and 7202). To declare that in attendance is no command to pay taxes is simply wrong.
In my attitude, the income tax is supported by directive. Some would rather we abolish it, including some who are running for office within 2008 (Ron Paul, for example).
To respond to your question, the notion that the income excise is unsupported by law is not crazy. It is merely wrong.
Federal income due is included in an amendment to the United States Constitution.
You might want to produce sure the person you hear that from can read...
Read the 16th amendment of the US Constitution...Link below
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_A...
I gave you the answer! The 16th amendment give the Congress the ability to collect taxes on incomes. Constitutional amendments ARE ruling!
It is supported
Do not believe everything people put in the picture you.
This has be brought up by fascists so often that the courts no longer laugh at inhabitants who bring this up in their tariff evasion trials.
If you know someone who evades taxes, turn them in. By not paying their share, your taxes are high.
You heard wrong. Check the sixteenth amendment. The Internal Revenue Code is the statutory body of regulation for this.
You may have hear that there is no canon mandating reporting of taxes. That is true. The US have a self reporting system. But there are steep penalty for not reporting your income or reporting incorrect income.
You are mistaken. Read on:
Passed by Congress on July 2, 1909, and ratified February 3, 1913, the 16th amendment established Congress's right to interrupt a Federal income tax.
Far-reaching within its social as well as its financial impact, the income tax amendment become part of the Constitution by a curious series of events culminating contained by a bit of political maneuvering that went awry.
The financial requirements of the Civil War prompted the first American income charge in 1861. At first, Congress placed a flat 3-percent toll on all incomes over $800 and then modified this principle to include a graduated charge. Congress repealed the income tax contained by 1872, but the concept did not disappear.
After the Civil War, the growing industrial and financial markets of the eastern United States mostly prospered. But the farmers of the south and west suffered from low prices for their farm products, while they be forced to pay illustrious prices for manufactured goods. Throughout the 1860s, 1870s, and 1880s, farmers formed such political organization as the Grange, the Greenback Party, the National Farmers’ Alliance, and the People’s (Populist) Party. All of these groups advocated frequent reforms (see the Interstate Commerce Act) considered innovatory for the times, including a graduated income rates.
In 1894, as part of a large tariff bill, Congress enacted a 2-percent levy on income over $4,000. The tax be almost immediately struck down by a five-to-four decree of the Supreme Court, even though the Court had upheld the constitutionality of the Civil War charge as recently as 1881. Although tend organizations denounced the Court’s ruling as a prime example of the alliance of government and business against the cultivator, a general return of prosperity around the turn of the century softened the constraint for reform. Democratic Party Platforms underneath the leadership of three-time Presidential challenger William Jennings Bryan, however, consistently included an income tax plank, and the progressive wing of the Republican Party also espoused the concept.
In 1909 progressives surrounded by Congress again attached a provision for an income tax to a tariff bill. Conservatives, hoping to wipe out the idea for apt, proposed a constitutional amendment enacting such a duty; they believed an amendment would never received ratification by three-fourths of the states. Much to their surprise, the amendment was ratify by one state legislature after another, and on February 25, 1913, with the documents by Secretary of State Philander C. Knox, the 16th amendment took effect. Yet in 1913, due to large exemptions and deductions, smaller number than 1 percent of the population paid income taxes at the rate of with the sole purpose 1 percent of net income.
This document settled the constitutional cross-question of how to tax income and, by so doing, effect dramatic changes surrounded by the American way of enthusiasm.
It's supported by a large volume of taxation legislation, as you would expect. That's how the taxman knows how much to rob.
As for the constitutional validity of that legislation, it's allowed underneath the 16th amendment.
For each of the following lawful scenarios, determine whether the petitioner's 14th Amendment guarantees.
For respectively of the following legal scenario, determine whether the petitioner's 14th Amendment guarantees have be violated. Your response should include each of the following:1. Legal grill: This is the question the mediator must ask himself or herself to determine if the right has be violated; for example, has the State of Florida violated the defendants' 14th Amendment guarantee to equal protection lower than the law?
2. The verdict: this is the answer to the legal press described above.
3. The rationale: This is a minimum of one-paragraph explanation of the decision. In the rationale, you must cite specific facts which support your verdict, including reference to how the 14th Amendment applies.
Answers: Best you do your own homework, to be exact the way you swot.
Do you own homework.
What is the basic outcome that was hand down in Brown v. Board of Education?
1.What is the unfinished decision that be handed down within Brown v. Board of Education?2. What does “separate but equal” mean?
3. Which amendment is said to be violated by the institution of "separate but equal" research facilities?
4. How does Brown v. Board of Education relate to Plessy v. Fergusen?
Answers: Brown v. Board of Education, a side slab
Brown v. Board of Education was just about the inequality for white and black schools but also almost adjectives special education imperative can be traced back to Brown v. Board of Education
1.That the system of setting two school systems, one for
whites and one for blacks was against the regulation.
2. Even if both systems were equal, which for blacks be never the case, it's still be against the law.
3. One school for whites, one schools for black
4. Brown v Board of Education be about background, Plessy v Ferguson was a public accommodation. This meant that blacks did not enjoy to sit in the support of the bus, be served at lunch counters, Sadly this was not enforced until the civil right movements of the 60's
1) Schools must be desegregated
2) Seperate services based on see are acceptable merely if they are "equal"
3) the 14th (no state shall deny to any person the equal protection of the law)
4) Brown "overturned" Plessy as far as school are concerned although cases like Green, Cooper v Aaron, and Heart of Atlanta be needed to expand and enforce it.
1. The basic outcome is that race-based segregation in instruction violates the 14th amendment rights of minority students.
2. "Separate but equal" be the legal standard that predated Brown v. Board of Education. Adopted surrounded by Plessy v. Ferguson, an old railroad satchel, it was the weak standard that segregation was acceptable under the 14th Amendment provided that whites and blacks be provided equal, though separate, accommodations. In essence, Brown v. Board of Education rejected Plessy's holding by arguing that the "separate but equal" standard serves to promote continued inequality between whites and blacks contained by the education context, for it perpetuate a notion of black inferiority that hindered the performance of childlike black students going through school.
3. As noted above, the 14th Amendment.
4. As noted above, Brown v. Board fo Education effectively overturned the Plessy holding of "separate but equal."
1. All students enjoy a right to the same core education near the taxpayers money.
2. The theory be that even though the coloreds(their words,not mine) were within a different school they get just as apposite of and education. This unsurprisingly was instrument wrong.
3. 16th and 24th
4. Plessy was barred to ride in a whites simply railroad car even though impossible to tell apart fare was compensated, seperate but equal applied yet again.
Ok tolerate me answer this simply. Brown V. Board of education arranged that seperate was automatically unequal.
2. Seperate but equal system seperate facilities of like quality.
3. That would be the 14th amendment which said "no state shall..deny to any personality within it's jurisdiction the equal protection of it's law."
4. Brown V. Board of education overturned Plessy V. Ferguson. Plessy V. Ferguson stated that states could hold seperate but equal facilities.
the 1954 brown vs. board of ed. stated that the 1896 baggage plessy vs. Ferguson was unconstitutional!!!
1896 stated separate but equal, brown proved that separate wasn't equal, thus end segregation.
that's in a nutshell. inevitability more info? do research!!!!!
On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision that "separate university facilities are inherently unequal." The decree effectively denied the legal font for segregation in Kansas and 20 other states near segregated classrooms and would forever conversion race relations contained by the United States. This site is a resource for information and source material going on for Brown v. Board of Education.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954),[1] was a signpost decision of the United States Supreme Court, which overturned nearer rulings going back to Plessy v. Ferguson surrounded by 1896, by declaring that state law which established separate public schools for black and white students denied black children equal pedagogic opportunities. Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Warren Court's unanimous (9-0) finding stated that "separate educational services are inherently unequal." As a result, de jure racial segregation be ruled a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This accomplishment paved the agency for integration and the Civil Rights Movement.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a highlight United States Supreme Court decision surrounded by the jurisprudence of the United States, upholding the constitutionality of racial segregation even surrounded by public accommodations (particularly railroads), underneath the doctrine of "separate but equal".
The decision be handed down by a vote of 7 to 1, next to the majority opinion written by Justice Henry Billings Brown and the dissent written by Justice John Marshall Harlan, (with Justice David Josiah Brewer not participating surrounded by this case). "Separate but equal" remained standard doctrine in U.S. ruling until its final repudiation in the subsequent Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education (1954).
The signpost Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954) settled the request for information of whether or not blacks and whites can receive an education integrated near or separate from each other. The satchel overturned the 1896 case of Plessy v. Ferguson, which established the doctrine of "separate but equal." This concept stated that separate public services of equal quality do not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which read:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalize in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall put together or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunity of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of enthusiasm, liberty, or property, in need due process of law; nor deny to any personage within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.
Linda Brown was an eight year weak black child who had to cross Topeka, Kansas to attend order school, while her white friends be able to attend classes at a public arts school just a few blocks away. The Topeka School system be segregated on the justification of race, and beneath the separate but equal doctrine, this arrangement was reasonable and legal. Linda's parents sued surrounded by federal district court on the basis that separate services for blacks were inherently unequal. The lower courts agreed next to the school system that if the services were equal, the child be being treated equally near whites as prescribed by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Browns and other families surrounded by other school systems appealed to the Supreme Court that even services that were physically equal did not clutch into account "intangible" factor, and that segregation itself has a deleterious effect on the nurture of black children. Their case be encouraged by the National Association For the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and be argued before the Supreme Court by Thurgood Marshall, who would following become the first black justice on the Supreme Court.
What hapenned to the Huntingdon Life Sciences staff filmed abuse animals?
I'm not talking something like court cases regarding anti HLS activist.remember the original UK documentary, which showed lab workers physically abuse and punching dogs and other animals? Were they ever dealt beside? Did they go to prison?
Answers: probably not.
try this relationship
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/stop_huntin...
yes they were prosecuted
Death penalty?
For or Against it?but earlier you answer please read
I am definitely for it!. If you put to death someone the same piece should happen to you. Why should that soul get to live their duration. Life is the more precious thing in attendance is and they took that away from someone else so what gives them the right to live?
I am not trying to force my assessment down your throat but I Would really like to hear some in good health thought out and INTELLIGENT answers
Answers: I could not agree with you more if i tried.
I am against it, because if you annihilate someone who killed, does that trademark you better? I believe the death cost is just revenge, because it doesn't brand name a difference one way or the other. Besides, duration in prison is no pic nic. You are surrounded by the worst of the worst, facing beating, rapings and worst, you have no freedom to do anything. Imagine living approaching that every day of your natural life.
But I respect your opinion, in recent times don't agree with it
The disappearance penalty is the right choice for stern criminals
It has a 100% nouns rate
To the poster with the essay
The numbers you use are flawed
You must compare chronological criminal records surrounded by each see to see if that played into the decision.
But greatly nice try.
How can you kill someone for slaughter? That's just hypocritical.
Here's an essay dealing next to my thoughts and arguments written a couple of years ago. If you don't agree with me, be off a comment, I'd love to debate with you.
http://indisputabletruth.wordpress.com/2...
Here is an excerpt:
The destruction penalty violate the right to life as proclaimed surrounded by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948). We treat prisoners resembling animals. Committing a violent crime does not kind someone any less of a human human being, and sadly, it seem a human trait to commit heinous crimes. Some believe it is necessary to execute undisputed prisoners to prevent them from repeating their crimes. This may be a valid argument, but there is other a risk that someone innocent will be executed. The death cost will not prevent a person from repeating a crime he or she did not commit surrounded by the first place. On the contrary, one study found that the death cost causes jury to acquit murderers due to the fear of making a mistake that would result surrounded by an innocent person one executed.
In addition, our officially recognized system is prejudiced. In Southern states, eight percent of blacks convicted of murder receive the death cost while only one percent of white murderers gain capital punishment. Also, murderers are seven times more expected to get the loss penalty for bloodshed a white person than a black human being. This strikes me as obvious prejudice. Senator Russ Feingold states, “The loss penalty legitimizes an irreversible feat of violence by the state and will inevitably claim innocent victims.”
Here is a different perspective. You don't hold to sympathize with criminals or want them to avoid a calamitous punishment to ask if the death cost prevents or even reduces crime and to believe about the risks of executing innocent family. Your question is much too key to settle without thinking nearly these.
126 people on demise rows have be released with proof that they be wrongfully convicted. DNA is available in smaller quantity than 10% of all homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent populace.
The death cost doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the death cost to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The death cost is neither. Homicide rates are higher surrounded by states and regions that have it than contained by those that don’t.
We have a obedient alternative. Life without parole is very soon on the books surrounded by 48 states. It means what it say. It is sure and swift and rarely appealed. Life lacking parole is less expensive than the loss penalty.
The demise penalty costs much more than enthusiasm in prison, mostly because of the legalized process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent people.
The disappearance penalty isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants near the worst lawyers. It doesn't apply to family with money. When is the finishing time a wealthy party was on extermination row, let alone executed?
The destruction penalty doesn't necessarily oblige families of murder victims. Murder subject family member across the country argue that the drawn-out death cost process is painful for them and that vivacity without parole is an appropriate alternative.
Problems beside speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent people released from extermination row had already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent being.
Edit for ya staff and Darin: The point about see is that a defendent is much more like to frontage the death cost if the victim be white. Although whites and non whites are murder victims in approximately equal numbers, 79% of adjectives death sentences come in cases where on earth the victim be white.
I'M being BLAMED FOR A ROBBERY CASE WHICH I DID NOT COMMIT! HOW CAN I BEAT IT? WITNESS POINTED OUT MY PICTURE
witness pointed out 3 ppl which i know! and be getting blamed for a robbery case we did not commited i get book ed and, out on bail now! what evidence can oblige me prove i did not commit it?Answers: You will need an Atty and he or she will lend a hand figure out your defense. Oh and catch the Lawyer before answering ANY question no matter how innocent you are.
A devout lawyer.
Eye witness accounts are the lowest accurate and most often wrong "proof" presented within court.
Get a damn good advocate.
I agree with a biddable lawyer, seize the best you can afford!
Also, a strong alibi for the date and time in ask is a good start! If you can show evidence that you be somewhere else at the time of the crime, the prosecutor will have a not easy time getting a conviction.
Example: Let's say the crime happen at 8:00 pm. If you can get witnesses (or surveillance video, or even a time stamped credit card unloading, with your signature) showing that you be 40 miles from the scene of the crime at 7:50 pm ... you have purely punched a big hole in the prosecution's skin!
This would be enough to formulate a reasonable character think that the eye witnesses be wrong! Get yourself a lawyer presently, and start thinking about where on earth you were at the time the crime be committed. Is there any destiny you were "caught on tape" somewhere far removed from the crime scene? If so consent to your lawyer know going on for it! Surveillance tapes from bank, ATMs, stores, factory security systems, etc can adjectives be subpoenaed and help prove that you be not at the scene of the crime
Do you think my career is discriminating against me if not what should i do (read details)?
I work at the pizza hut wing street name center in westervillie ohio. and its a vastly unprofessional work enviornment anyways i just moved to ohio from michigan my aunt get an international job position and travels alot she thoroughly very comfortable:)with that being said i picked up a subdivision time job at the name center and my aunt son is home alot by his self so he orders alot of deliever food pizza hut donato's chinesse and he directions what we call a pzones and it never fully cooke ne ways i command from work one day and he have creidts are under our house number merely manager can ok a credit and they start curious me about the 3 credit for 7$ that enjoy not been used and sayin that i can't enjoy them but they were not mine and the be honest earned crdit s on my cousin be partly so the deleted the credits which be very unmerited and a manager said the other mangers said her plump *** with do any article for food even lie i didn't fake and the proceeded to say i entail to no order so much pizza hut i don'tAnswers: Your boss have every right to question a questionable credit - your term, his account -you enjoy to admit it looks funny, also know that if he didn't interrogate it, he wouldn't be doing his job. However if the credits be placed in devout faith, and the governor deleted them, consequently your cousin has a right to sue within small claims court to get them wager on - but that is between your employer and your cousin - it have nothing to do near you, unless there is something fishy going on.
Now contained by regards to the "fatass" remark - he doesn't hold the right to call you that. You inevitability to inform him that you find it offensive, do that contained by writing, and make sure his boss get a copy and someone in human resources at Pizza Hut Corporate get a copy. If he does it again, then you hold a case for hostile work environment. If he starts pushing you heavier after you craft the complaint, you have a hostile work environment travel case. But you have to put in the picture him that you are offended first, in the past you can start making a case. Make sure you document EVERYTHiNG!!! from very soon on. Times, dates, witnesses, what be said and the outcome of the conversations!! Good luck.
Learn to friggin' type! This stupid text typing is annoying and stupid.
From what I could pull together, and it wasn't much, why do you think you're one discriminated against - do you even know what discrimination law entail?
WTF don't hold a clue what you said...too much nonsense
I got ripped stale on Ebay, how do I get my money backbone?
I started asking the seller question about the XBOX 360 I won. He be answering very briskly and being agreeable. When I was done asking question he told me once he recieved my payment he would ship it and endow with me a tracking number. Once I payed using Paypal he has be ignoring adjectives my messages. Its been 5 days since paying and I newly want the xbox or the money back. It be $300. I think it be a fraud. What should I do?Answers: contact paypal!! and 5 days is not long wait unless it be priority shipping. give it a few days.
also.. see if he printed his own shipping label. if so , their is a tracking number and if the mailman does not confirm it, paypal will take the money out of his side.
First, calm down. Five days is not plentifully of time for a shipment - especially during the heavy holiday gift-giving time when the post bureau is really busy.
Secondly, in the encyclopaedia, how did the seller influence he was going to ship it. Unless he sent it by Priority Mail or Federal Express, you should lurk for at least 7 days for ground abdication by UPS or Postal Service.
Then, did you check the sellers reputation? How be his feedback? Is he dependable and reliable in his sale? If so, you will more than likely receive your product.
Did the retailer give you the tracking number? If so, enjoy you checked it?
If you don't receive it, you can go to Ebay's home page. They hold a section near for disputes. Click on that and follow their instructions.
You can also dispute the payment next to PayPal..if you go to their home page, they also hold a section for disputes. They are correct at refunding payments if you don't receive your merchandise.
I deliberate you are jumping the gun a touch.5 days isn't a lot of time...
I market on Ebay. I always mention how the item will be sent, notify the buyer the morning it is shipped and send the buyer the tracking number.
More Questions and Answers:
[1621] - [2050] - [1270] - [2285] - [1135] - [1897] - [549] - [759] - [217] - [636] - [1984] - [146] - [1866] - [738] - [449] - [2281] - [592] - [946] - [2423] - [1789]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: