Law Questions and Answers

Why must home owners be required to shovel city sidewalks?

I reside in the midwest and we are currently getting hit near a heavy bout of snow. Like may cities mine requires residents to shovel/salt the sidewalk next to our property within 24 hrs of the snowfall finish or be billed for the clean-up. Why is it my responsibility as a tax paying home owner to clear the city sidewalk? Land ownership regulated that MY property begin 7 ft from the road. I do not own the sidewalk! Just like the road is cleared by plows the city should also steal responsibility for the sidewalks! .. and please no bs answers about taking civil responsibility to do my part of a set for the community. That's why I pay taxes!
Answers: Because it is the responsible piece to do.

You live in a community and surrounded by any community there are things that populace do for each other.

The tangible shame is that you will not do this on your own and have to be forced to.
I agree near you. I don't always shovel the sidewalk because I don't own time to. I keep it verbs as much as I can, but if I was ever fined by my city for such things, I would be at the terrifically next city tryst complaining about everything I see the city force doing when they're wasting tax payer dollars by stopping by the grocery store contained by a city vehicle, standing around doing nothing at parks, hiring illegals, etc.

I would clear their lives miserable if they were to force me to rate a fine that I don't believe is constitutional.

I don't think the city should hold laws that dictate what homeowners are forced to do to help yourself to care of city property. Cleaning the sidewalk is a courtesy and should never be punishable next to a fine for not keeping it clean.

Did you know that if someone falls on rime or snow on the city sidewalk by your house that you are the one who will be sued for not cleaning the sidewalk?

Did you also know that you have to settle up for repairs or replacement of these city sidewalks if the local kids damage it or it get cracked from age?

Too much government - at the local, state and federal level! We need smaller amount government regulation. Most individuals will shovel or sweep the sidewalks as a courtesy to people contained by their neighborhood. We don't need more law to tell us what we "have" to do if not...
Yes, you do pay taxes and yes, that subdivision is owned by the government. However, if the affairs of state was responsible for cleaning the sidewalks, it would require more rates money to cover the cost of extra employees, time, equipment, etc. This cost would hold away from schools, direction, and even maintaining the roads. By shoveling the sidewalk within front of your house, it saves you excise money that the government would otherwise collect to do the livelihood - and knowing the government, they would find some track to jack the cost up. This can spark an entire debate about the legitimacy of take in your Midwest nouns, but it's also common courtesy to pedestrians. If the sidewalks are not shoveled, pedestrians must saunter in the street, which may organize to more accidents surrounded by the long run.

It's a tricky issue, but a great question.
You do realize obviously that if someone is injured on that side walk that YOU as the homeowner ARE responsible and CAN be sued and the personality who is injured CAN win in that suit?


Been in that done that.

Go to the next town talk and tell them you want your taxes raise so the city can clear the walks. Then better amass in the things you have need of for the next 20 years or so because when your neighbors find out their taxes go up because YOU did not want to get out and clear the walk you will not be popular.
I am a homeowner who also reside in the Midwest. Shoveling our walk is a annual occurance here as well. It is a sanctuary factor. If someone walks on the sidewalk & falls, you will be responsible if the sidewalk wasn't sufficiently cleared bad. If your property is laid out like most areas of the Midwest, that 7ft that you claim is the city's is technically yours. It is for right of process access. Contact the city attorney in your community to procure confirmation.

Until you get confirmation, grin & accept it. Clear your walk, any doing it yourself or hiring someone else to do it. Having the city clear sidewalks will require more workers & they are paid $15/hr or better, thus increasing our taxes even more. If you want to bypass the ordinance, subsequent summer have your sidewalk ripped out at your expense & put subsequent to the road. Due to the layout of my neighborhood, my sidewalk lays next to the street, so after a 2-3in snowfall, we won't see our tramp until it warms up satisfactory to melt snow & we enjoy never been ticketed for not clearing our walk. Good luck!!.

Teenscreen - just another passageway to put kids on drugs?

TeenScreen is a very controversial so-called "diagnostic psychiatric service", aka suicide survey; done on children who are consequently referred to psychiatric treatment. The evidence suggests that the objective of the psychiatrists who designed TeenScreen is to place children so special on psychotropic drugs.

"It's just a mode to put more people on prescription drugs," said Marcia Angell, a medical nouns lecturer at Harvard Medical School and author of "The Truth About Drug Companies." She said such programs will boost the public sale of antidepressants even after the FDA in September ordered a "black box" sticky label warning that the pills might spur suicidal thoughts or travels in minors. (The New York Post, December 5, 2004)

See correlation - http://www.psychsearch.net/teenscreen.ht...

Question - What are your thoughts ?
Answers: I agree with the "It's a short time ago another way to put those on prescription drugs" statement. I mean, yeah, conceivably these teenagers are depressed, but a test can't determine that for sure. A individual can't just wish if another person is depressed, you know? And even if these inhabitants ARE depressed, I don't think it's right. I niggardly, if a person doesn't want your assistance, don't force it. You know how many fruitless parents that are just so incredibly gruesome at communicating with their kids are newly going to think "Oh resourcefully, my kid must be depressed, let's put them on drugs" It's a stupid idea contained by my opinion. If a creature really needs relieve, they can find it elsewhere. Drugs are probably only going to hurt them contained by the longrun.
Haven't we figured this out on the other hand?

The pharmaceutical companies are probably the most powerful group in the US today.

And the system and the pharms won't be happy until we are adjectives addicted to their happy pills.

I, for one, reject to fall for their bs, and I noticeably won't drug my child so a teacher doesn't hold to deal beside child-like behavior.

Our inherent laziness and utter inability to pocket responsibility for our (or our children's) actions is butchery us.
It is a powerful tool to push kids onto antidepressants. My husband and I both have have terribly gloomy reactions to antidepressants and enjoy therefore refuse to put our children on them. We have have CPS after us over this issue.

To Janis616 above: I have have clinicians and psychologists "suggest" and even try to force me to give my kids these meds. They did a pile-up of "evidence" on me and sent it to CPS, who threatened me near "Medical Neglect" charges.
so many kids are on drugs and they aren't helping them. basically making them suffer even more. i think populace need to gossip to more kids instead of putting them on drugs.

How do I legally catch rid of a roommate?

My boyfriend and I rent a house in which I am the signature on the lease and my father is a cosigner. For the 6 months we have be here we have be subleasing the two extra rooms. Our roommate Bob has be renting a room since we first moved in. Us three own been great friends. Last month my mother moved within. Bob and her have since, developed repulsive relationship.

Prior to the month of December Bob notified us that he would not hold his rent until the 5th and we agreed as he has other paid us contained by full. December 5th Bob gave his 30 daytime notice out loud to my boyfriend and asked if he could use his deposit to pay for the month of December and earnings us the remaining $50 of the rent. My boyfriend agreed. As of this date he still has not remunerated the $50.
Answers: Unfortunately for you.if he has be a resident there it is his home as resourcefully. as far as the cops are concerned he can do what ever he wants to do nearby as long as he is not breaking the law. The one and only thing you can do is notify him that his rent is due. In writing. (The choral agreement on letting him use his deposit for the months rent was surrounded by good religious conviction then but he have since backed out of that agreement). Once he is astern on his rent he can stay there for as long as he can achieve away with it. What I indicate is he may not ever pay you rent again and be in that thru the next month as all right. You will have to evict him. Well this take time and depending on the state you live in and the law governing renters you may be in for a long dispute. I think it would purely be better if you make energy living with you horrible for him and it would be his edict to move. But be careful he may want to give up when you are least expecting it. close to in the middle of the dark, and most of your thing will give up with him. You are contained by a situation that I would not want to be in and nearby is not a good process to handle this if this man is affiliated next to any gang members. Or you could only do like contained by the movies.lock him in the freezer and move out, you will be off him for the next tenant to deal next to him!
srry didnt have time to read your details but i know your own to give them atleast 30 days identify and and deal near any diposites or stuff like that beyond that im not sure

Minimum or maximum securtiy prison???

how do you know whether a prsion is maximum or minimum security prison?
for example this prison within california ... Salinas valley state prison????
what type of crimes do the inmates of minimum financial guarantee prison commit? and im assuming the inmates in maximum shelter prisons are convicted of like murder, rape and other crimes close to that right????
Answers: Just in lingo of levels in the prison system, a person is sentenced base on the level of the crime itself, any "specifications", such as use of a gun, the prior history of the felon and most importantly, the compass of incarceration that is allowed by statute ruling for that state. Bear in mind also, a convicted murderer next to various severe specs can start a life sentence contained by a max prison and if he behaves as a "model prisoner" can and is normally upgraded to a minimum prison over a 15 to 20 year period. Just because it is a minimum prison, dont mull over that everyone in near did minor felonies. I hope this help
the maximum security prison is reserved for the hardest offender for crimes such as serial rapists, serial murderers, terrorists, in other words the worst offender. there is single minimal contact with anyone else, usually on lock down 23 hours a light of day in their cell.
and minimum security is for those convicted of neutral felonies that are not a serious flight or warranty risk.

Question about SSI and children?

If I am approved for SSI (not ssd) will my 2 year mature also receive a check? I am very confused roughly speaking this and I get mixed answers roughly speaking it. Thanks to anyone who can explain this better to me (:

also I live in the state of virginia. I know it vary from state to state. Thanks!
Answers: Call the Social Security office and ask them and bring the CORRECT answer.
How can you have a two year hoary AND get social financial guarantee (not disability) benefits?

I would assume that you may be speaking of survivor benefits (and if so, I am very sorry) and if to be exact the case your 2 year prehistoric would get the benefit check, and you would singular get one if you be married.

The above answerer is correct, just send for the social security authority and they will tell you what is going on.
Hmmm, I'm assuming you are applying because of a disability but don't own enough work credits to qualify for SSD? I know that if you be eligible for SSD, your child would receive a check that amounted to 50% of your check. I'm not sure about SSI, I don't muse so.

If that's not correct and you're talking survivor benefits, after yes, your child would receive a check.

You need to parley to someone at SSA.

Celebs getting appearance fee's for charities?

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/a821...

I'm disgusted if that's true, it was contained by the papers also. How can celebs not support a children's charity?. I mean by adjectives mean claim travel expenses but demanding a payment.. she denoted it to an american hospital (AFTER a fuss was made) ? big operation it was money that could enjoy gone to the British charity it was given from?

I won't be buying anything she's get anything to do with.. not that I would , they are lately back to take money, so transparent.

I prefer take that if I have to pick a band of the pop world that's transformed.. at least they write their own work.

since she like America...go rear legs there and don't seize any money from British people OR companies.
Answers: We are adjectives disillusioned with charities, no thing what we give single 10 to 15 % goes to the charity itself. It's revolting, if we grant say a tenner to BHF by purchasing Christmas cards,they solitary get lb1-lb1.50. Animal charities grasp on average 80% of donations.Something should be done.
MOST celebrities get hold of "appearance fees" for their "charity" work.

Amazing how the sheep fall for their crap.
She does this for a living
she be worth the money
You work and expect to be paid
She is like peas in a pod
Hate to break it to you but most of the charities and charity events out there are freshly shakedown operations where on earth the organizers and such hang on to most of the money and the charity itself gets little or none.

What happens if a character doesnt have plenty money to be buried?

i am curious what happens to a individual if they do not have ample money to afford a funeral? will the state just foot to have them creamated?
Answers: It depends on the state but some do cremate and others provide a totally simple and inexpensive funeral. Comes down to cost and then a burial plot etc.
I would guess that they go and get sent to a local landfill - at least specifically how things work in Jersey..

U know the law in the region of driving??

u know da law going on for being approaching 17 to get ur receipt and 18 to get ur license??? have that law passed on the other hand? or not
Answers: it da pends (or depends for those of us who speak english) on where you live. Where do you live? We will be capable of help you closely more if you gave us adjectives of the information.
If you are in the amalgamated states, its 16 to get your license and depends on which state as to when you can catch your permit. Here within Illinois you have be contained by Drivers Ed in High arts school to get your grant, you cannot get it on your own. Once you go by the class and turn 16 you can get your license. There have been rumors around the law shifting to 18 to get licensed, but they are a short time ago that, rumors.

What is your opinion just about Euthanasia?

My Person opinion is that if someone is surrounded by terminally ill and suffering and they are officially sane then they enjoy the right to choose what to do with their natural life and the Government should not have the right to interfere

I would really similar to to know what other people's opinion nearly this issue is. Please no rude answers and I respect everyones opinions
Answers: I've never contained why there's so much wailing and moaning about allowing some 90-year older cancer patient who suffers constant agony to train their life beside dignity while at the same time plentiful of those same people devise it's perfectly moral and defensible to slaughter some 3-million babies a year.
There should be no YOUTH IN ASIA. Enough Americans were kill or wounded in Korea and Vietnam.

As far as RIGHT to die? The Kevorkian defence says it adjectives.
I support legalizing assisted suicide for the terminally below par, but with restrained restrictions. These restrictions should include:

1. An independent evaluation and an administrative hearing concerning the person's mental capacity to request assisted suicide. I would NOT support an inquiry into whether the character has "satisfactory to live for"; that is totally subjective and courts should not second-guess anyone on that. The hearing should be ONLY on the issue of mental competency.

2. A mandatory waiting time of year.

3. A round of mandatory counseling.
These are hard moral judgements. A party dying a painful release...euthanasia. is a nice word for committing suicide. Right or wrong, where to draw a procession. I am sure you are suggesting this sollution out of empathy for a suffering soul.
A simple shot?? Is a person sane who requests to kill himself? Or is he depressed. Pain does that to a character. Unfortunately death is on the odd occasion easyly done by administering a narcotic. Probably the only one who does it successfully is a junky who give theselves an unitntional overdose.

I really do not think that most MDs want to take home a decision similar to that. Removing life support is a total different thing.
MDs see copious die and unfornutely it is not always pleasant.
And who is moral adequate to make the declaration who dies or not. When does it become murder? I am sure Hitler had lady reasons for his euthanasia. Where is the smudge?

Probably you are against capital punishment or let just name it murder. Probably you are for abortion but seems approaching murder to me.

I do not think that any human can breed this judgement, make it once it is particularly difficult, the second time a little easier and so on. A pathalogical contract killer goes through alike process.
A soldier never gets used to passing and the agony but they harden themselves to adopt it.

The Government is not a person but a structure, it have no concious, morals and screws up most things government do.

But having watch many society suffer, die, and seen oodles animals euthanized I know in my heart I could never assist in human euthanasia. It is murder wraped surrounded by a nice name. Unfortunately we adjectives have demise in adjectives. Might sound approaching the most pleasant way out but consequently again you do not know how you will feel when your time comes whether surrounded by pain or not.

Who has the authority to drop statutory rape charges?

21-year-old have consensual sex with a 15-year-old. No force or coercion involved. Parents relay the police and he's charged, the "victim" is told she can't drop charges and neither can her parents. Both the victim and the 21-year-old hold given statements and its now contained by the hands of the DA
Answers: Thank piety a DA with guts! Because it is adjectives the parents have no concept how to raise the CHILD appropriately.

The DA at this point.
As a child you can't consent
It statutory rape, you own no say
you can waste to testify maybe which will stop it
What is a 21 year weak doing with a 15 year elderly???

A proper parent would ask. Even a Cop would like to know.
No one can. The fully fledged is a sexual child abuser and is in the hand of the law very soon.

And - a 15 year old cannot "pass consent" to have sex near an adult.

I hope they fry the 21 year elderly creep.
If I am reading your statement correctly, the DA is offering a plea bargain here. In the state of Ohio, where on earth I live, statutory rape cannot be dropped and is automatically picked up as a state charge regardless. If you can get this tender in writing, it might be worth your time to consider. Even though the sex be consensual, minors are not considering having the facility to make that type of decision for themselves, which is why the charge is later rape. If you decide to "lug this to the box" it is guaranteed to convict. I hope this helps you.

More Questions and Answers:
[1340] - [1156] - [2339] - [2564] - [1194] - [579] - [1622] - [1892] - [69] - [336] - [820] - [858] - [1653] - [30] - [1818] - [2499] - [2183] - [376] - [1171] - [830]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: