Law Questions and Answers

How do you deal near theft by postal workers?

My aunt sent presents for my kids through the letters. Someone stole one right out of the box at the post office. (the box be not tampered with)
how would she move about about righting this?

and why are family so heartless?

its christmas! and someone stole a present from a BABY!
Answers: Get a complaint form from your local postmaster. Report the incident exactly as it happen and the postmaster will investigate it and decide what if any appointments should be taken.
still not sure what you're saying, be it taken from a po box, a drop box, or what? can you trace where it be taken from? If so you should call postal inspection service, NOTthe postmaster!!!! He'll cover up anything to reclaim his own rear.

IS it possible something else happen to it? look at all the possibilities since accusing someone of stealing.

How do you trace a last will and testament save with legal representative and cant find copy and you know one was written?

Answers: It's entirely subjective. Wills do not have need of to be registered per se. If the person have a personal solicitor, or worked for one it is worth starting there, but will probably be fruitless. Check if they have a bank description where this service be offered as a free service, the service provider might have a copy. Otherwise, unless you can find a copy, you might hold to prepare yourself for a long fight. If you enjoy a photocopy of the will but not the original, you can apply to the court to hold this recognised as an original copy of the will within the absence of an actual untested signed will.

In the absence of a will, your single other option is to apply for a Letter of Administration (without will), and the following relationship might prove to be of use. Good luck!

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/1...
d

In an assault case, who is the defendant?

The character who commited the assault or the person who be assaulted?
Answers: The person who committed the assault. The being who was assaulted is the subject and the plaintiff.
The aggressor (AKA: suspect)

What do you think around electric shock treatments on students?

Answers: "Don't tase me bro!"

Sorry, it had to be written.

I involve more details. Are you talking just about medical/psychiatric shock treatment, or law enforcement tasing during a use of force incident?
i dont suggest its necessary or humane. whereabouts without purpose or intent can lone bring the undesirable.

Could my boyfriend get into trouble?

Ok so i am with the sole purpose 16 and I live in Co my boyfriend is 18 and lives within New Mexico. nder Colorado law he would be surrounded by no trouble but New Mexico law is rather hader to interpretate. I also dont know which state law we would plunge under?
Answers: i deem he might get within trouble since your underage. but then again, your states law might apply to you guys seperately so maybe he wont receive in trouble but you will ? idkk..
what do you connote...get contained by trouble for being ur boyfriend..

i dont reflect on so unless u get pregnant bc after they could slap rape charged onto you.
I was 16 and dated my boyfriend (whom I'm still with) who be 25.
just dont shift tell any authorities. and if anyone threatens you, break it past its sell-by date.
you cant help who you dive in love next to.
you're 16. I'm sure you can figure things out for yourself (at tiniest for the most part)
You would fall beneath both state laws according to the mann exploit.

Has copyright infringement become non-sense?

Yes, I steal things on-line and it is wrong (sorta)... However, as I inevitably figured, I did seize caught. What I didn't think would develop is that I would get caught for downloading a TV show... Season 3 of Battlestar Galactica. One would reflect this is a scare tactic, but I am one sued for $3,000,000.00 (the maximum per episode) and threatened with 5 years surrounded by prison. Yet, when logically thinking, none of this makes sense...

First, my defense be going to be that I did not receive any financial gain, this was for personal use. However, the directive states that by acquiring something of effectiveness, even a TV show, it is a financial gain. Sneaky.

Ok, so regardless of the fact that DVR's, VCR's and DVD recorder are legal and I payment for cable... the whole entity doesn't add..

If, when released to DVD, what would my max punishment be if I physically stole the DVD? So, should I a short time ago physically steal DVD's instead? A lighter sentence right?

Do you believe the copyright laws are extensive?
Answers: China steals and copies everything and there is nil that can be done except beg the Chinese affairs of state to crack down on it, but the truth is they want the Chinese citizens to get as much as they can, to America's detriment! China owns America and her debt, so America is at the mercy of anything they wish to do! Chins tell America jump.America say...How high Honorable Chinese boss man! Nothing will come up to you!
Steal it from Wal-mart. They don't even prosecute for less than $50.
I do presume law enforcement is unchecked in this country.
I thought the max fine be $250,000, that's what the FBI warnings utter.
You may want to invoke the "cruel and unusual punishment" clause of the Bill of Rights. 3,000,000 is obviously unrealistic.
You are not individual prosecuted for downloading the material. You are individual prosecuted for UPLOADING (sharing) it. With most P2P programmes you automatically upload as you download.

If you distribute without authorisation, you are violate a federal copyright law. If you shoplift, you are violate a state law. There is a difference.

I do agree beside you that copyright laws are outdated for today's technology. But, lamentably, the large companies near the most money are the ones that can pretty much get their track --- for now. This will changeover as people win fed up near the tactics of the entertainment industry. You can fool inhabitants for only so long! ! !

And, by the method, the next time you want to engage contained by this type of activity, please use a proxy so it cannot be traced to you.
> Has copyright infringement become non-sense?
> Yes, I steal things on-line and it is wrong (sorta)

OK, very well you just admit it and that sorta seals your fatal accident, but for information's sake...


> Season 3 of Battlestar Galactica. One would think this is a startle tactic, but I am being sued for $3,000,000.00 (the maximum per episode) and threatened next to 5 years in prison. Yet, when logically thinking, none of this make sense...

Ah but it does make sense. Someone made it, and that someone, or their licensees, enjoy by virtue of a constitutionally granted copyright, a limited-time financial monopoly to benefit from their property, subject to Fair Use exemptions.

That is the outline of the law, and it is reasonable. Your defense needs to work inwardly that outline, or it is a waste of everyone's time.

> First, my defense be going to be that I did not receive any financial gain, this was for personal use.

OK, a neutral use claim, good approach...

> However, the canon states that by acquiring something of advantage, even a TV show, it is a financial gain. Sneaky

. but a weak claim. Not sneaky at adjectives. You took something from them they had an exclusive right to market, in no instrument different then taking a video from Blockbuster or a candybar from 7-11. they made it and desire to sell it, and you took it form someone for free.

That is commonsense economics, and the directive will recognize it.

> Ok, so regardless of the certainty that DVR's, VCR's and DVD recorders are endorsed

Those are tools for copying, and the ability to copy have been subject to extensive litigation for years, usually reaching the supreme court (see the history of VCR litigation). The current equals of technology is under involved dispute and the law is somewhat unsettled. But your baggage doesn't likely hinge on that, as you can't state you had a right to copy the matter from a rightful source - I bet you got it using a p2p program, right? so you deeply made a copy of a stolen copy, legally speaking.

> and I pay packet for cable...

That has nought to do with your baggage though does it?

> the whole piece doesn't add..

Because you are fishing contained by the wrong sea...

> If, when released to DVD, what would my max punishment be if I physically stole the DVD?

Depends on the jurisdiction unsurprisingly, but you are asking rhetorically, right?...

> So, should I just physically steal DVD's instead? A lighter sentence right?

If i.e. what you want. But apparently you wanted a digital copy on your computer.

> Do you believe the copyright law are out of control?

No as you would expect not. They are entirely consistent with the reaons given for copyrights as explained within the Constitution - yes it is explicitly in here.

But, as I said, they are under live change and conflict.

I cover the reason for this on my blog, but generally it have to do with conflicting business models for financing dignified risk high return content contained by Hollywood and Silicon Valley.


All that being said, if you are really one sued, then here are 2 places for you to start research how to handle your situation for solid, as it is serious, instead of simply ranting and throwing wishful thinking out there that no court will support:

1 - www.chillingeffects.org
2 - www.eff.org
* 1 morning ago
* - 2 days left to answer.

Additional Details

1 light of day ago
Really, regardless of my scenario, this is the question I pose. Why would my sentence be a misdemeanor offense if I physically shoplifted a DVD, however it is a very hefty federal offense if I acquire it electronically?

Secondly, since they can claim "financial gain" by stating that the objects is of value, should I not be charged for the appeal? So, $49.99 for the DVD, and say $12 if it is a movie contained by the theaters.. plus a little extra for breaking the regulation.

I think that on-line thieving should be in-line with physical appropriation, but why isn't it? Also, why can I record to a DVR... but i can not download a show the subsequent day.. even if the show I download included the commercials? I am paying for cable...

So, surrounded by closing, I feel that copyright infringement have become a farce. People selling DVD's should be punishable by law, but for us downloaders, make available us misdemeanors. just my 2 cents.

1 daylight ago
Actually, I believe the maximum fine is $150,000 in regard to a TV show. However, I downloaded a season which is 22 episodes at $150k a pop.. :) I am not worried about the consequences, I am pretty undisruptive since I am very helpful in the anti-copyright world and enjoy some good lawyer, but it just made me pose the examine.

1 day ago
Ahh :) However I do not pip :) I actually don't use a proxy intentional, I have a devoted line, loyal IP. The whole point be to challenge the ruling once I got caught, so I don't watchfulness much.

How to split up property in a will?

I would similar to to make a will departure my house to one child, but requiring the other child to get a portion of what the house is worth. I'm doing this because I know one child requests the house (they grew up in) and the other child would just fairly have money. I dont hold much money to give so is it possible to put surrounded by my will that the child who receives the house must own a fair open market appraisal done on the house and give the other child 25% of doesn`t matter what the appraisal value is; to be compensated out over a period of a year? If so how do I do this so that it is legally recognized and legit and not open to discrepancy or dispute amongst the children?
Answers: I speak give 75% to one child and 25% to the other and tolerate them work it out.
You DEFINITELY need an attorney surrounded by this case. I one-sidedly don't think your plan is a worthy idea, but it can probably be done officially.

Find a inmate at dupage countyjail?

Answers: Try calling there, and ask.
http://chicago.citysearch.com/profile/35...

If i sent my kids to visit beside their grandmother for thanksgiving weekend and she refuses to present them back?

next serves me with a thought of a hearing for guardianship will the mediate here me in court
Answers: You call for to call the police and move about pick up your kids. Unless she has an ORDER of quardianship, she is kidnap your children. A notice of audible range is just that, A become aware of that there is going to be a audible range on the guardianship, not that she has guardianship of your kids.

You also inevitability to talk to an attorney where on earth you live asap, to fight for your children. If you've done nil wrong and are a good mom. you own nothing to verbs about.
Yes he will hear you!
If you're a flawless mother, then don't verbs.
If you don't have any criminal history of child rough up or if they are in worthy health later she will probaly be the one getting in trouble. Thats close to kidnapping.
Depends on what country you are surrounded by and the applicable laws. Also depends on why your kids are anyone held away from you... Seek professional advice without delay.
Yes he'll hear you but you can call the cops to draw from them from her until the court hearing.Unless she have some real solid proof your kids are individual abused in some course..you can call the cops and charge her next to kidnapping.
Yes he will hear you. As long as your not uncharitable and always thinking of yourself over your children, and your financially competent to care for them, and you lay past its sell-by date the dope,crack, & booze then you should be fine.
The deem will hear you and NO, she cannot legally maintain them. Simply call the police, recount them of the situation, and go and pick them up.
Yes, you will hold your day contained by court. Unless they can prove you to be an unfit mother, you will get the children subsidise.

Parents Tried to Sell Baby in Store Parking Lot for $30?

PENSACOLA, Fla. — A couple be charged Friday with trying to put on the market their 2-month-old baby for $30 surrounded by a store parking lot, authorities said.

Robert G. Ellingson, 23, approached two people surrounded by the PetSmart parking lot and offered them a beer. When they refused, he offered to get rid of his child, Escambia County Sheriff's officials said.

"At first they thought it be a joke," sheriff's spokesman Glenn Austin told the Pensacola News Journal. "But consequently the mother yelled to the group that they be trying to sell the newborn. And one of them called us."

Ellingson and Maghen Duvala, 25, the baby's mother, be each charged beside four counts of child neglect. They be being held contained by Escambia County jail — he for $27,000 and she for $15,000. It be not immediately particular if they had decriminalized representation. They were expected to gross a first appearance Saturday.

See link - http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,3179...

Question - What are your thoughts ?
Answers: relations kill their kids. try to flush them down the toilet, throw them within garbage can. its crazy. i remember the song brenda's got a kid by tupac. it reminds me of this situation. its like individuals can't handle have kids so they try to give them away, market them. be adults. love your kids. you wouldn't want your parents to do that to you. throw you away, abort you, sell you for subsequent to nothing, seriously. culture need to grow up, and get hold of right.
years ago we could do something with folks that were nuts
but the bleeding heart of some Americans just couldn't stand the thought of the poor things(nuts) one in the nut house.
I am sure formerly it is over we will hear how these two never were right. you know things approaching the problems they had within their childhood. this is what I can tell you, my daughter have problems she is 23 years old and in attendance is nothing we as her inherited can do to help her. but in recent times wait till she hurts someone
inadequately enough. after everyone will say they know something was wrong next to her. why didn't they do something. I am here to say if someone doesn't do something give or take a few this whole protecting the nuts it is going to return with very desperate.
oh yea my thoughts are they should be locked up for ever.
I heard something like this on my local news and I thought how desperate this is. To sell your own child for $30 is freshly plain stupid. Even before they showed the picture of the couple I figure they must be on some type of drugs or something. I just can't take to mean how someone in their right mind would go their own child and for $30 at that. Well I guess the only virtuous thing that have come out of this is that the child is safe.

More Questions and Answers:
[1385] - [576] - [1410] - [111] - [1343] - [2304] - [1300] - [183] - [1922] - [2321] - [2023] - [894] - [1272] - [450] - [1591] - [1258] - [1075] - [2207] - [1594] - [1843]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: