Law Questions and Answers

Is there anything I can do roughly baby's daddy gambling during visitation?

I own walked into a store and found my newborn in the store next to dad scratching gash tickets for hours at a time during visitation. They say he is within there for hours near my child as my child is playing on the floor in front of the counter. is nearby anything legally that I can do.
Answers: yeah it is right for him to be at hand with his son and gash those tickets but why is he on the dirty azz floors and he is not looking at him at all he should of kept him within his arms whats his problem and especially in they store and on the floor...
You could reverse time and truly think something like who you slept with previously you made another human with a "babe daddy".

My wife had our babe-in-arms last week; one of the administrator from the hospital asked me if her and I were certainly married. I was for a time p!ssed off at the give somebody the third degree until I recalled that while we be at the hospital all of the women who have babies had to attend a class, I be the only Dad in that.

Since you did not care ample to make a commitment up to that time you made a baby here is very little that you can do to hold him in charge for his behavior. In fact it seem like a travel case of the pot calling the kettle black that you are actually probing ANYONES behavior.

This question say a lot in the order of society.
Yeah, you can actually hold responsibility for once in your enthusiasm and start taking care of your kid, while keeping the kid away from this other scumbag.

Good luck, Britney.
I agree/disagree near Dash. The important item is that you realized this is a problem and by asking for backing, you are seeking to remedy the situation.
I would think that what your ex is doing is certainly a form of neglect. You would know how to prove this in court by getting noterized statements from some of those who own witnessed him being surrounded by the store for hour as he allowed your child to play on the floor while he was having a bet. It's a bit of a long shot, but it's better than nothing.

Do you think Cigna healthcare be wrong to deny granting the liver transplant to the 17 year old girl?

She completed up dying a few days before Christmas even though her doctors at UCLA medical center have wrote letters to the insurance company aphorism they recommended the procedure, yet Cigna who made over 1 billionn surrounded by profits last year, chose to voice it was too experimental and overrode the doctors. Those below 18 years of age have a one year survival rate of 97% next to liver transplants (65% for 6 months for old people). On December 11 she be in right enough vigour to have the operation plus near was a liver available on the other hand Cigna said no until Dec 21 when there be an infection in her lungs that prevented operating on her and a few minutes after Cigna said ok finally she died.
Answers: Yes and no.

Morally, I muse it is disgusting. But from a business sense, all they are doing is working as a business surrounded by the system that you have surrounded by the USA. They are not a charity and if they act resembling one, how will that be right where one party gets treatment, and others, near this and other insurance companies get funding refuse?

I live in the UK and work within the NHS (our universal strength care system). It have problems, but not as many as the US healthcare system have. Despite spending much more per head of population than other developed countries, the US have worse health outcomes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care... Life expectancy and infant mortality data in the US are greater than in other developed countries, despite more money person spent (and wasted) in the USA.

In the UK nearby are waiting lists for routine problems. Problems that can not dawdle are treated as emergencies. Also, within the UK, people can also enjoy private health exactness.

I can understand Americans mortal proud of living in the richest and most powerful country contained by the world. What I can not understand is why Amercians settle for an expensive healthcare system where on earth babies die that would have a better accidental of life if born contained by another developed country.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2...
It's unfair you're not stating adjectives was wrong near this girl.
Due to chemotherapy and etc... her liver was dog-eared.
To extend her life Drs. proposed the liver transplant; NOT curative but REALLY EXPERIMENTAL approach to extend her go, that was moderately limited anyhow.

At first I said "Bad CIGNA" they kill her!

But reviewing all the facts see no motivation for the transplant except to prolong death; that be inevitable anyway.
IMO was denied and labeled experimental PROPERLY!

Can't believe myself for once agreeing near an Ins. Co..
This entire story is an example of a group of people who are exploiting a horrible situation to achieve their own personal goal.

Gerrigos, the lawyer, is a publicity seeking scumbag who is exploiting the atmosphere of a family who as lost descendant child. Before you climb on my @ss, I lost a 16 year old child a few months ago.

There are the politicians; who knowing that you would surface sympathy for a beautiful immature girl who was prematurely taken from the planet, are using her to exploit and get done their political goals. Meaning that they enjoy somehow politicized a disease.

But the fact is a lovely girl died because she have leukemia. The drugs used to fight it would own prevented the liver from adapting to her sick little body.

Beyond the "insurance guys are evil" crowd; transplant-able organs are a controlled resource. Wouldn't you prefer that they go to a being who can best utilize them.

I know it is hard, but as a man who lost his lone son can tell you, go has profoundly of hard choices.
i don't believe what they did was wrong because they are individual trying to make money, i don't focus they are in it to hide away lives. currently healthcare it is a business and it is sad to see someone's vivacity turned into commodity is such a way. this is why the goverment should provide some sort of safekeeping net to prevent these things from taking place.

cupcake, true they should disclose it but what business would save money and increase profits if it could.
If the hospital have thought that this procedure was a curative necessity they would hold gone ahead with the surgery -- insurance be damned. The actuality was it be an expiremental shot in the misty to extend her life after have already received a bone marrow transplant and experiencing catastrophic complications.

I'm sorry - but based on the set facts at hand.I agree next to Cigna's decision. I reckon that one of the problems with medical costs within this country is that we throw good money after doomed to failure in cases where on earth care is futile. People die -- it's melancholic, but it's reality! Too lots people suppose that there is a tricks wand in prescription that can keep destruction from happening --- after 15 years contained by the field I enjoy seen that tangible death does ensue despite our efforts, and I enjoy seen far too much money spent on futile pains to prolong a life that could own been better spent kind for another patient.

The girl be sick, she had comiplications, and sorrowfully she died -- it happens. No one is immortal.
Beyond the political monarchy of all of this, Dr.'s pilfer the Hippocratic oath to do all they can to let go someone's life. A Dr. at Cigna made the judgment to not do everything within their power to collect this girl's life. I don't fastidiousness if she only have a 1% chance of living, everything should hold been done to try and release her life.

Because the UPS truck driver carelessly run over my elderly dog in MY PRIVATE driveway, is UPS liable?

He be also afflicted with aurthritis and be recovering from a leg injury. The guy was driving resembling your typical UPS driver this time of year. It was within a confined space and he hit him as soon as he started to drive away. My dog was a 70lb. Labrador retriever. He never stopped, drove stale and claimed that he did no know that he hit him. Libery Mutual is the insurer. How much should I ask for a settlement in US $? he be my world and that is no sh!t. I own no children. My dogs are my children. The folk's at Liberty Mutual informed me right away that he was considered property and that it would be handle differently than if it was a human self.
Answers: Follow the links below - It's letters from a guy surrounded by SC back within August who also had his dog run over in his driveway by a UPS driver. He say Liberty Mutual handled the situation drastically poorly, and he was considering hiring a legal representative.
Yep, a dog is property. And I'm sorry for your loss, I know how much one can love a pet. But you're entitled to recovery of your monetary damages, and nil more. How much was the dog worth, and I don't scrounging to you, but on the open flea market? How much for the poor fellow to be buried? Other than that, you'll have a strong time proving damages.

Good luck.
When a delivery entity comes onto your property and causes break, that person's insuror is responsible for indemnifying you. (Indemnify means to "be paid whole" again ... in other words, to discharge you for your loss.)

A pet has a programmed cash worth - a dog is considered property, and Liberty Mutual will compensate you according to their liability schedule.

If you consistency it's not enough, you can ask your insurance company to subrogate. You can also sue Liberty Mutual for any extramural money you think you're owed.
Good luck trying to sue UPS. Their lawyer will chew you up and spit you out in court.

As for your aging dog, in good health, look on the bright side. You won't have to enjoy him/her put to sleep now. That save you at least $150 right stale the bat.
I am so sorry to hear about your dog, that is to say such a tragedy for you. Liberty Mutual is trying to get out of paying money, so please do not sign anything from them until you speak near an attorney. Depending on your state laws, you may know how to get money for 'pain and suffering' and for any medical bills that you incur due to ardent pain.

There are attorneys who specialize surrounded by representing people who enjoy companion animal cases. One of the nationwide organization http://www.aldf.org/ is the Animal Legal Defense Fund. They have a record of Bar Associations and member lawyer in adjectives states who are familiar beside animal law.

I know this is a dreadful time of grief for you, but please find a local attorney who practices animal rights law who can sustain you. My heart goes out to you.
You'll be lucky to receive anything from the insurance company.

First stale animals are considered property, it doesn't matter to the insurance company, or the statute, about how you consistency towards your animals.

Secondly, I'm surprised the insurance company hasn't used inferred culpability on your part. Their argument would be that you know, the animal had physical limitations. That these limitations could hold been life span threatening or place it in an unsafe condition, but you allowed the animal to stray anyways.

You, yourself stated, that this was a confined space, but you still allowed a handicapped animal to be contained by it.

You stated, the driver hit the animal as he was departure. This means the driver come on your property and you knowing that your dog was handicapped and surrounded by a confined space, was allowed to stay surrounded by the area.

As a responsible, loving dog owner, you should enjoy brought your animal out of harms way, by placing it on the porch or surrounded by the house.

That's how the insurance company will present this, if they have a mind to. If your merely asking for a couple hundred they'll probably settle just to bring back it over with.

If you try to hit for the fence, I guarantee you'll get nadda.
near is a motor vehicle law within every state that you're suppose to make sure adjectives is clear ahead (if moving forward) or behind (if going within reverse) before moving your vehicle. Under the memo of this law, UPS is liable, not merely for the monetary value of the dog, but the dog have provided you with comfort and companionship, you have looked at this dog as a member of your nearest and dearest. Thus, you had also incurred thrilling stress from this experience. You should write a formal letter, and convey it via certified with return bill as proof that they had received your missive. You should explain the events that transpired on the day of your loss, the designation of the driver, his truck unit number, and how you suffered anguish and passionate pain over the loss of your beloved companion. Give an initial proposal of $300 to replace the dog, and maybe $700 for your spasm and suffering. If they refuse this tender to settle this matter, explain that you'll be file in small claims court to verbs your loss. If you go this route, you will ask the court for $500 (go to an expensive pet store contained by an area that's the equivalent of Rodeo Drive contained by Beverly HIlls, CA, and get a written estimate of their most prized and expensive dog) to replace the dog, $1,000 for your throbbing and suffering, and $3,500 in punitive damages; for a total of $5,000 surrounded by damages if UPS refuses your initial submit to resolve this matter.

On the $500 to replace your dog, the court will individual approve what document receipt, or forms you can produce to establish the dog's monetary pro. So if the pet store can only contribute you a written estimate of $200 as their most expensive dog at the moment, then the referee will only compromise you $200 because that's the only document you can show to prove the dog's monetary convenience.

If you're not familiar beside punitive damage, you're asking the sort out to punish UPS for their negligence in running over your dog. On punitive sprain, the judge might distribute you all of it, a portion of it, or none of it. The driver be in reality negligent within putting the truck in gear minus looking under his truck as he climbed on the bus.
I understand your inner health about your dog, but don't tolerate emotion let somebody know you what to do.UPS certainlky won;t let emotionfigure into any settlement.,
So, back you listen to people who are recitation you to get a attorney right away, wait and see what UPS will propose you.
I don't suggest a lawsuit. Remember,this won't be the first time a UPS truck ran over a dog, and they enjoy corporate guidelines as to what kind of settlement they will proffer.
omg, this is horrible.
my aunt is a UPS driver, and she said you must park on the street.
i bet he was a immensely new driver. (with the busy holidays and all)
and, i bet, within this unique situation, UPS could vastly much so be liable.
but, i bet they would try to say your dog be so old, it isn't worth that much money.

if he never stopped.. how did he say aloud he didn't know he hit him?
i think i would ask for $10,000... (to cover bills at least)
but, if a UPS man run over a child... who had a leg injury, at hand would be hella money involved.
good luck- I'm glad he didn't die.
Stuart is right on near the response. UPS insurer will compensate according to their list of values. As far as the driver UPS will put the catastrophe in his hand file and that's it, unless he have previous accidents he could be suspended or fired. As far as suing..dutiful luck dogs are hit all the time. And as far as UPS drivers pulling contained by driveways, they do all the time if they can grasp in and out confidently. We are instructed to walk if its a short distance from the road, but for back surrounded by.

DWI, DUI help please?

2 days ago i get arrested for driving drunk. I refused to blow the breathlizer but the policeman did made me totter in a straight strip and stand on one foot. I failed to both so he took me to the city secure unit. I call my parents and they take-home pay an attorney like a 1000 bucks to free me. Now im looking for another attorney and see what i can do in the region of my case.
I know that the police are more strict next to driving drunk now and it be really stupid of me to do it. I do not have a doomed to failure record, or done anything fruitless in times past. i go to college and enjoy a job. im really stressed out in a minute because i dont really do stupid things like this, i a short time ago dedicate to be in motion college and work.
Please if you can help me near what to get and what to do, some tips, or anything that can assist me on court, i will really appreciate it. Maybe some classes that i can take. Did refuse to blow the breathlizer a good thought?.

Please help.
If this happen to you please tell me your story and how you resolved it.
Thanks
Answers: Don't verbs about it purely do everything what you suppose to do but you should never refuse what the police read aloud to you cause it is a big time no no on that one it is other good to follow here instruction and taking that breathalyzer that is something you should own done and will just listen... subsequent time if they suspended your licenses for that next go to those Alcoholic Anonymous classes and show it to your attorney so you could obtain your licenses fund
Under the Implied Consent Law, refusing to filch a chemical test will result within an automatic suspension by the DMV. You agreed to this when you signed for your license. Retain a reliable DUI attorney,and follow his advice.
http://dui.findlaw.com/dui/state-dui-law...
You don't usually salary a lawyer to gain you out. You pay a bail bondsman... usually 10% of the actual stated bond. So that would propose your bond was $10000? Kind of steep. If it be the case that the advocate charged $1000 dollars to just obtain you out that would be steep as well. Could be that you own basically already remunerated for him to represent you in court. So you might look into that in the past you get a different one.

If you do amendment get the best one that you can afford. If your parents balk at the cost remind them that yes you did mess up... but the potential costs next to fines and insurance will be tremendous later. Plus within is all the money that they enjoy spent already. It would be a shame to waste that just for you to have employment difficulties after graduation. This is no time to skimp on the brass.

My understanding is that surrounded by Texas if you refuse the testing it is a 90 day suspension. But also that it a mistaken belief that you admitted guilt approaching in other states. They hold basically no evidence so other things that happen could be challenged. If you be not swerving what was the starting place for the stop? Were you speaking correctly but just hold no coordination? What proof is there that you be over the limit?

Years ago I did duplicate as you. I spent basically double the going rate for an attorney. In the conclusion I was offered a operation... if I signed a piece of paper wise saying that I would not sue the state I would be free and clear. But money aside I found out something interesting when I asked the lawyer how he manage that.

Turns out he already had everything within order so that if things did not shift my way he would hold me out on appeal in 30 minutes. The prosecutors enjoy to justify time and money spent and an appeal would cost the state more money. With that already within hand the prosecutors be basically similar to "fine we will deal" as it is easier to slam the next twenty offender. Something to ponder.

Which Law Granted The Right To Worship Freely In Maryland?

Answers: I don't know if this is what you're looking for, but I'm guessing you're talking roughly speaking the Toleration Act, which was passed rear in the mid-17th century. And it didn't really allow the right to worship freely, if you consider the fact that non-Christians did not benefit from that tenet.
The US constitution.

Perhaps the Maryland constitution did so first, I don't know.

Does anyone know the georgia tint laws?

Answers: http://www.tintcenter.com/laws/GA/

http://dps.georgia.gov/00/article/0,2086...
No tint allowed on windshield or driver's side porthole.

California Petty Theft advice ---- caught at Kohls store?

Recently caught by Kohls California store for a petty mugging of $50. Officer charged with Misdemeanor. Will they put me within Jail or just some fine and community services? The merchandise is of $44 dollars. Can I appeal for Infraction? Why did they charge me Misdemeanor?

I am idea so embarrassed going on for the whole item now since for few dollars I hold lost all my peace of mind, sleep and I am not competent to live my normal energy. I have to appear surrounded by front of court in month of February. Has someone face this kind of situation? Will it remain on my library?

I really dont want to go surrounded by Jail. I am ready to earnings fine. Will i be on some probation? Is there any gentle of diversion program that i can request for?

I have just this minute started my new career few months back and I am a Part Time Student. I enjoy learned my Lesson already and I WILL NEVER REPEAT this MISTAKE surrounded by my whole duration and never do such ACT.

Can I just preserve myself in the court. I call few Lawyers and they are charging me $5000.
Answers: I would think you'll return with Community service. Doing things like cleaning public rest rooms surrounded by the court house and the public parks. Stinking job..
Any legal representative who would charge you $5,000 for this is a crook. You don't need a advocate at all. Either represent yourself, pro se, or obtain a public defender. There is zilch a lawyer can do for you if you be caught red-handed.

You would never go to reformatory for this, ever. You will have to rate a fine/court cost, and get probation.
For $44 I don't muse there is even TECHNICALLY a randomness of jail time (since it's below $50). In fact for this amt & a first offense it may be downgraded to an "infraction" which would transport no criminal record. You'll probably capture a sort of informal probation where essentially all you hold to do is NOT get within trouble again for a certain number of years (7?) and it may be expunged from your history, or possibly you could get "real" probation where on earth you actually hold a probation officer you have to report to...though I doubt you will even enjoy that.

You may get a fine of a few hundred and/or community service. And you may own to sign something that you will not go pay for into Kohl's. That would be if the store asks for that.

You DON"T need a $5000 legal representative for this either. You can be assigned a PD who will do as much as the other would do,- -there is not much to do since you are ready to plead. Don't pay someone that generous of money for a couple minutes work.

This is what will probably happen: the PD will ask you a few question & you'll tell them you will plea guilty; he/she will later consult with the prosecution and come pay for to you with what they are offering. Your armour will come up, you'll say you're pleading guilty, the attorneys will inform the style guru of what is agreed on, the judge will get it official. It should adjectives be over very like a shot.

I'm glad you realize what a dumb-a** thing you did and frankly, I'm glad you get caught - -better you got caught in a minute with a small amount than to own kept on and get caught next to $500 of stuff. Hopefully this will stop you from ever trying it again - -if you get a second offense you won't achieve off so insubstantially. A 2nd petty theft charge CAN be charged as a felony.
i stole $5,000.00 of stuff...get caught...paid 200 thousand dollars surrounded by legal fees..lost contained by court but only get probation. but haven't done a movie since. winona ryder

Can anyone tell me if visit is a contact visit or losing a window for the frank greenan detention facility?

Answers: In 99% of jail and detention facilitys it is ehind a glass porthole and sometimes chain connection only special circumstances do they if truth be told allow contact visits

Redemption In Law Theory?

Answers: I think we requirement a little more here
In civil cases, i.e. cause damages by negligence or breach or contract, one can buy "redemption" by paying the amount of the court's judgment. In criminal cases, it's not so simple: while adjectives parlance may refer to paying one's "debt to society," there's nothing surrounded by the law give or take a few that idea. These days, near information so widely available on the internet and elsewhere, it is often said that, surrounded by criminal cases, "every sentence is a life sentence." Being convicted of any crime can own serious consequences for many years after the court's sentence have been salaried or served. In law, there's no such point as full redemption.

Why do smokers feel they hold the right to poison other people?

second paw smoke kills---there's no debate on this.

how can smokers complain about their rights, when what they do kill people

do it outside away from society and there's no problem
Answers: we do not feel that we enjoy the right to poison other people, a short time ago you
Relax
And understand that even in need cigarette smoke. the air youre breathing is making you ailing as we speak.
Because it is my air also
most who complain smoked some time or another surrounded by their lives. Then suddenly they are health nuts. One see and they are choking. Didn't bother them when THEY were smoking.
"Second foot smoking" is remindful "second hand sex"...or "second foot clothing" or "second hand shoes, etc. All hold been used earlier.
If second hand smoking bothers you, move away. There are satisfactory laws on accounts where general public can remove themselves from any areas where smoking is permitted.
(And do you realy believe the cigarette manufacturer are that concerned about smoking? They're stil surrounded by business! Not going anywhere) PETITION THEM !!!
and btw I have never smoked a cigarette within my life (age 24) but if others do and it bothers me, I move away.
Ah I own suggestion don't hang around smokers.

Smokers by the taxes they settle up are more than paying their way through robustness care.

They hold higher robustness insurance.

Yes there is a debate on the in poor health effect of second hand smoke.

The honourable new is that smokers enjoy their own areas to smoke.

They don't smoke on planes.

There are plenty of no smoking sections when you move about out to eat.

Bottom don't similar to smokers? Don't hang around them.
Get a grip!

Tobacco is a LEGAL substance.as long as the smoker is not within a non-smoking area, he/she have every right to enjoy the obsession.

If you don't like it, stay away from public venue that smokers attend.
Most smokers would be happy to own places where they are allowed to smoke and rejection all non smokers. Every one have to right to free choice. If you dont like to be around smokers dont dance into a business that allows it. But self righteous nanny staters want it all their mode. With people similar to you it is my way or no method. Just so you know I am a non smoker and dont feel the stipulation to tell other ethnic group what is best for them and try to run their life. I pinch care of myself and go them alone.

More Questions and Answers:
[670] - [873] - [1822] - [638] - [797] - [2082] - [1744] - [1380] - [492] - [1006] - [2332] - [1235] - [1060] - [704] - [1696] - [2380] - [904] - [107] - [1509] - [2087]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: