Law Questions and Answers
Victim of citizen financial?
citizen financial is a scam they scammed me and my family out of nearly 8000 dollars the even would appointment back to check on us in a minute that takes guts if anyone know how to find these people or lock in them please let me knowAnswers: These scammers single operate from phones and the internet. There is no easy course to catch them, and the authorities are constantly trying. You can and should report this pilfering, but you have little hit and miss of ever getting your money back.
When you've get no one else to turn to. Call A-Team.
Please help(Especially if your know Illinois laws)?
HOW CAN YOU GAIN CUSTODY OR FULL GUARDIANSHIP OF A PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY ABUSED CHILD WHO ISN’T YOURS? PLEASE THIS IS VERY SERIOUS!!!!!SERIOUS ANSWERS ONLY
THE CHILD AND I BOTH LIVE IN ILLINOIS.
Answers: This is a complicated issue that doesn't have clear-cut answers. It's not really a issue of specific state laws, since surrounded by my experience they don't vary that much. In any bag, you don't provide enough details of the circumstances to breed educated guesses more or less laws.
I used to do mixed types of foster care and child welfare work. The gist of the answers you wish is that the issue of establishing abuse is moderately separate from the issue of guardianship. These issues will be dealt next to separately, and over a lengthy interval of time. There is no guarantee that even if the parents lose custody of their child, that you will be made the child's guardian. I will provide the official response first, and an informal one following.
If the child isn't already in CW custody and/or the knock about isn't reported, this has to be the first step. You must contact CW and variety a report. In many jurisdiction, it is a crime to be aware of child abuse and not gross a report. Moreover, if you do not do this, but later state that you know abuse existed, CW will be annoyed that you want custody, but didn't concern enough to fashion a report, which will reduce your likelihood of being the child's guardian (for instance, when I did this work, if a situation arose where on earth somebody wanted custody of a child, and know about name-calling yet didn't report it, I wouldn't enjoy considered placing the child with that person). At the time you record the report, you can mention that you are concerned for the child, and you are willing to perfectionism for the child if a caretaker is needed.
From there, CW have to investigate the claims. If abuse is substantiated the child still may not be removed from the home; CW may opt to work with the parents in-home instead. If CW decide to remove the child, it is not guaranteed that you will get custody. The typical scenario is for CW to find relatives to trouble for the child before considering non-relatives. However, by staying contained by touch with the CW workers on the covering, you can keep your label and concern on their minds, and possibly be considered as a caretaker, if one is needed. It is true that there is a shortage of foster homes and appropriate placements for abused children.
And at hand are hearings, and sundry CW shenanigans. The procedure is not a matter of calling CW, and have them instantly take the child from its parent(s) and appendage him/her over to you. This could take a long time, years even.
Meanwhile, if you want any sort of custody via officer channels, you are required to be qualified as a foster parent and/or as an adoptive parent. This take time and money. It's not automatic. You will be interviewed, along with your employer and friends, you will be fingerprinted and have a criminal environment check, etc. Depending on your location and what path you choose, this will cost you from a few hundred to several thousand dollars. You will expected need to retain a legal representative for this. This road you wish to travel is especially difficult, heartbreaking even, and expensive and lengthy.
Now for my unofficial response. Honestly, if I be you, I would frankly ask the parent(s) of the child if you can take him/her bad their hands. Just approaching that--I'd go to them and enlighten them you'd like to thinking for their child. If they agree, make them sign something simple wise saying they are willingly giving their child over to you to diligence for, so they can't claim later you kidnap him/her.
I make this suggestion base strictly upon the assumption that you have no history of brutality, substance abuse, most important criminal activity, or sex crimes; and, that you are fully prepared emotionally and materially to strictness for this child long-term. If you aren't fully prepared as described, I urge you to bow out as a potential caretaker for children, and let somebody else do it. You should still contact CW surrounded by such a situation.
You won't have any permitted rights if you adopt unofficially, and it's certainly a court gray area, but not one to be precise likely to carry you in any trouble (so long as nobody knows). You will probably hold some standing as the child's guardian, if any issues are raised down the road. Of course you should never speak of your arrangement to anybody, as most ethnic group won't understand.
Why do I promoter such an unusual arrangement? Because I think that it is far smaller quantity harmful to the child to enjoy such an informal arrangement, than it is for the child to be subjected to the terrible stresses of the child-welfare machines. Far better for the child to be placed surrounded by a loving home unofficially, than to spend years being hurt by parents and bureaucracy, if you ask me.
You probably won't remain friends beside the parents in the scenario I've described, so it doesn't matter which course you go going on for it. If the parents don't agree to your unoffical caretaking, then send for child welfare, and be polite, persistent and lenient with them. Try to be within the child's life as an interested, positive individual, and if you're a person of conviction, pray for the parents and the child.
First, report the situation the child protective services. Right now.
Second, breed it known to CPS that you are available as a foster parent or guardian to the child if and when they generate the decision to place the child.
I need to know roughly store closing laws for personnel.?
I work for an Atlanta based company here contained by New York City and have suspicions that my store will be closed down and that the owner is okay aware of the situation. My question is for a store of 5 workforce what are the laws for a store closing such as how masses days in mortgage does she have to enlighten us that we are closing. I know there are secure laws for stores of 50 or more but not sure give or take a few small companies. So if anyone can help and consent to me know the laws and tolerate me know if it would be legal to sue her if she doesn't confer us enough off-putting? I've been here a year but my coworkers hold only be here 3 months so they wouldn't be able to go and get unemployment and we would also obligation time to look for a new brief. Please help.Answers: I used to hold a friend who was a chief at a chain (I'll bid it Long John Gold's). One night, she get a call: lock up, inform tomorrow's shift not to come contained by. Practically the whole secure folded overnight, with no qualification.
What I am saying is, I don't know of any decree requiring them to give you any consideration.
They can walk you out the door on 1 minute thought, and say that you will procure 2 weeks severance pay.
Thank you for your service.
Here is the dilema. If she go out of buisness and does not notify you, who to you sue. the store is out of buisness.
Then again, she could come up to you tomorrow and tell you that your no longer needed. She is below no legal condition to give you any catch sight of at all.
Start looking immediately. You are under no endorsed obligation to enlighten her you are looking.
there is no requirements to notify anyone if or when the are going to close a store.
better be looking for a hot job
devout luck
If you think you will inevitability a new opening, the time is now.
A pious time to close a store is after the Christmas rush..
Are criminal charges warranted against Sigma for denying dieing girls liver transplant?
Answers: You know folks..PRIVATE BUSINESS..they hold the right to determine IF procedures are experimental.obviously surrounded by this case they reversed themselves.again their right to do so...why did the parents linger until the last minute? If they be truly concerned about their child they would enjoy sold everything they had...borrowed money.do doesn`t matter what they needed to do to get the operation..more importantly why aren't they suing the hospital and doctors who refuse to perform the time saving procedure..their mandate is "first do no harm"
malter is right. If any perform is criminal, its the fault of the hospital for allowing the girl to die. They shouldn't refuse permission for lifesaving measures.
Can I Speak On Behalf Of My Cousin In His Case?
My cousin's case have been dismissed because nearby was no evidence. He be accused by his supervisor because the supervisor required to humilate him. Anyways the case have been dismissed and in a minute my cousin wants the citation/arrest "hermetically sealed and destroyed." I think we enjoy a very obedient chance for getting it hermetic and destroyed, however, my cousin gets hugely nervous and starts to tremble when chitchat in front of the conciliator. In his last audible range I tried to intervene and help him out, but it seem like the pass judgment was not too please. I get the impression that merely my cousin or a lawyer can represent him. Anyways is at hand a way/procedure that will allow me to talk on his behalf and explain why my cousin should hold not been cited.Answers: You cannot represent your cousin if you are not a legal representative.
I can't see what you would say i.e. relevant anyway. You don't say where on earth this is happening, but within most US states that have this type of procedure, it's a pretty cut and dried affair. There is a statute that sets out what your cousin have to prove to have the store sealed and destroyed. He requests to go down the inventory in the statute and address respectively point in it to show the consider that his case falls underneath the law.
Many times this can be done contained by writing in a petition or other pleading. That would necessitate to be signed by your cousin and/or a lawyer, not you.
If it is done in words in court, same entity. Only your cousin or his lawyer can speak to conciliator about the points to be made in connection with the statute in press.
Generally, there is no "guise witness" needed. So there is no role for you within this process as I understand it.
EDIT - within California the statute is Penal Code 851.8. Many counties have developed their own forms for these petitions. Check the website of your county for their local rules and forms in connection with these petitions.
If your county does not have a special form, you might thieve the forms and instructions for Orange or San Diego county and adapt them for file in your county. The petition would hold to be typed in the format required by the California rules of court.
This procedure requires that the arbiter finds "factual innocence", not a short time ago a lack of evidence. That requires your cousin to show the adjudicate that there be NO reasonable motive to believe he had committed the offense. This where on earth you might be helpful. You may submit a affirmation in support of the petition setting out FACTS why in attendance was no credible cause to believe your cousin committed the offense. These facts must be inside your own knowledge. For example, "There be no way anyone could acceptably believe that my cousin committed this crime because my cousin was next to me in Russia at the exact time the crime be committed."
There are a number of attorneys doing this type of work within California for a reasonable levy. Maybe your cousin should call one.
Your brother can phone call you as a witness to say what you know, but you cannot represent someone short being licensed to practice tenet. The laws governing seal records are reasonably straightforward and usually there is no court appearance. One requirement only report the appropriate papers in the court. However, so far as I know, no court will authorize the physical destruction of its annals. If that happened, your brother could never prove that the satchel had be dismissed.
Is it RIGHT to still have law against Catholics in modern Britain?
Tony Blair couldn't become a Catholic when he be Prime Minister because there are still anti-catholic law in Britain.Isn't it time to shutting down these laws against a person's right to chose their religion?
Answers: There is nought to prevent a Roman Catholic, a person of another hope or of no faith becoming Prime Minister. However the biggest piece of State Bigotry, The Act of Settlement which prevents Roman Catholics becoming monarch is intensely much still in place. The well brought-up news however is that the Act is awfully likely to be thrown onto the dust mound via the Human Rights laws. Several hundred years tardy, but at least a step within the right direction.
You're wrong. There is no law preventing a Roman Catholic mortal Prime Minister. The only law restricting Catholics are those to do with accession to the monarchy.
It be Blair's own decision to dally until he was no longer PM until converting. There be no legal problem here.
The point made within the media be that there may be some 19th century law on the statute books that prevent a Catholic from becoming Prime Minister.
It was probably departed on the books because it would grounds problems when the PM came to appoint Anglican Bishops.
It wasn't until that century that Catholics could become M Ps.
nope
john
Frankly, he's an ex Prime Minister and not the best one we've ever have.
Why is it news simply because he's become a Catholic? If he'd become a Satanist, that'd be worth a few lines on the front page.
This isn't.
> The law still stands barring the monarch from choosing Catholicism as a religion.
Isn't that disappeared over from Henry VIII's split from the RC church and creating the Anglican Church?
It would seem to affect so few inhabitants, and none of those people,. over ~500 years, enjoy felt strongly satisfactory about it to complain. so, if they don;'t complain, even within modern times, why should the rest of the state's government win up in arms give or take a few it?
Especially since it would raise the bigger and more pressing "modern issue" of why is here a monarchy in the first place anymore?
The British state is NOT anti-Catholic, specifically rubbish!
The only regulation left on the statute books that I am aware of which discriminates against Catholics is the one preventing Catholics from taking the throne and thats an outdated piece of rubbish that go back hundreds of years. I'm sure if Prince William looked-for to convert to Catholicism noone would even mind. It wil eventually be overturned as its obsolete.
There is no canon against a Catholic being Prime Minister or holding any other public organization. Its nonsense to read out there is.
Sorry Raymo/Mr Sceptic you are both wrong. Under screened-off area 18 of the Catholic Releif Act 1829 and i quote:
"No Roman Catholic to advise the Crown within the appointment to offices contained by the established church. It shall not be lawful for any soul professing the Roman Catholic religion directly or indirectly to advise his Majesty, or any individual or persons holding or exercising the organization of guardians of the United Kingdom, or of regent of the United Kingdom, under doesn`t matter what name, style, or title such department may be constituted, touching or concerning the appointment to or disposal of any office or preferment contained by the Church of England or in the Church of Scotland; and if any such being shall offend contained by the premises he shall, being in that of convicted by due course of law, be deem guilty of a high misdemeanor, and disabled for ever from holding any department, civil or military, under the Crown.
As the Prime Minister is responable for advise the Queen on the appointments of Bishops and other Clergy this would be classed as a misdemeanor.
The Roman Catholic faith go against everything that i stand for the freedom of expression, civil liberty, the right for a woman to choose for an Abortion or not, within Scotland the Catholic Cardinal Keith O'Brian said that Catholic politicians who defend abortion should not expect to remain full church member, how could we elect a Catholic and expect them to put us first.
With the Monarch head of the Church of England, and the certainty that, in principle, the Monarch invites someone to organize her/his government, it would appear to have some logic. You can't serve the Monarch and the Pope. On the other appendage, one of Queen Victoria's Prime Ministers was Jewish.
Apart from pressure from his wife, it is possible that, as a Roman Catholic, Blair can presently make a full confession of his sins. Love to be a fly on the wall surrounded by the Confessional box - or may be not a fly, just a small bug.
What do you think of this?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071222/ap_o...Answers: Well, you can thank frivolous lawsuits for making condition care such a nightmare contained by the US. Doctors are afraid of having a long-suffering play "lawsuit lottery" and get a bogus decision, so they order lots of redundant tests. This have in sector caused the of form care to skyrocket, due to expenses (tests, malpractice, etc).
This demanding case is a tragedy. I do expect the insurance company should have worked faster to render a favorable edict. But still the whole system is broken, not only the insurance companies.
This just proves that insurance is the biggest scam allowed.
Health, Life, Car or otherwise.
I go and get pissed off purely reading it.
What a bunch of cheap *** beep sound the horn beep
it reminds me of the movie THE RAINNMAKER, so gloomy
Insurance companies ?
ok 2 people Tom and Jon are involved. Tom is departing town for the weekend so he parks all 5 of his motorcycles contained by the garage, Tom has insurance against nicking, he also has a surveillance camera contained by his garage that is record 24/7, he uses it to tape his projects. so he make sure he locks everything and leaves. Jon knows something like this, he comes at night wearing full motorcycle gear and breaks into the garage and starts the motorcycles and take of with it comes pay for does the same for adjectives five. neighbors didn't see nothing adjectives the camera caught was a personage fully covered from head to toe. Tom comes backbone finds the garage open and adjectives his bike are gone calls the police does everything he have to. how long will it take ? beforehand Toms bike are replaced or does he get compensated what the bikes worth ?Answers: Well considering this was a thieving, there will be an investigation, the cartridge will have to be looked at, and it should show someone beside a key to "start" the motorcycles. I guess the insurance company is going to want Jon prosecuted and it will depend on what the policy says. Or they could deny cuz Jon and Tom are involved and the insurance company could expect this is a scam. This could take a while so I hope Tom isn't spending the money even so.
It depends on how the motorcycles are insured.
He will probably get neutral market importance for the bikes less the deductible-he will catch a check for the amount and not receive actual replacement bikes. It may take a week or more, that adjectives depends on how long the adjuster takes to manipulate the claim.
If he had the key to start the motorcycles he is not going to get salaried.
How do you know it was Jon if he be covered head to toe. How do you know it wasn't Tom who know how to get former his own security to collect? Tom would be my first suspect.
"Your account" is correct, next to the exception of the one-week window for allowance. Once the claim is filed, it can steal up to 30 days (sometimes more) to get expenditure, especially if more investigation has to be done.
the insurance company is;nt going to recompense anything until a full investigation is done.the first thing they will ask is who have the keys to the building.afterwards go from near.could take months to settle.could be the owner who;s truism that it was someone else stealing his property.the unharmed case looks similar to an inside job for sure.possibly both men are involved.can;t see the insurance company paying anyone until the facts are proven that it was an intruder.but from what you own said it pretty much looks like it;s one of the two men mentioned.
Is Tom committing insurance fraud next to Jon as his accomplice? This sounds a moment or two odd to me. It depends on who the insurance company is and how long their investigation take.
What Do You Think of Supervisors Repremanding Employees for telling other Employees almost the Death of another
Employee? They Did Not want them to Grieve or show any Feelings. Did Not call for Grief Counselors and they are the Ones New on the Job. The Employees Knew respectively Other and worked together for Years..This really Happened. What should happen to the Supervisors?Answers: Let me first start that Mr. "I've Been Banned 29 Times", evidently you are comparatively proud of that, I hope when you are in loss of a human being close to you, whether family or friend, that you do not receive like callous response you newly gave. The lost may not close-fisted a hill of beans to you, but it indeed can to others and we should be mindful and respectful of those affected by it. I wouldn't dispense you the satisfaction of have you banned so you could brag it be 30.
I am sorry for the loss of your fellow employee. Obviously, that being had a most important impact on all of your lives
Depending on the temper of the loss, such as violence contained by the workplace that caused the departure, most employers do not provide grieving counselors merely because somebody died. That is because those counselors come at a very big price (several hundred dollars per hour). As cold as that seems, it is a concern of pure cost of running a business.
The grievance counselor provision is for when moments of undue loss or catastrophic event may cause a long-term psychological impact cause a major cuff of events on productivity in the work place at a mass smooth.
Do I agree with you that the supervisors are reprimanding you folks for discussion about the loss? If it is relatively fresh and the first few days, I muse the supervisors need to allow you folks time to adjust. If it ongoing former the week and now it is interfering beside process of conducting business, they have a right. Perhaps you folks can consequently arrange a after work memorial time for all of you to discuss overtly how all of you enjoy been artificial and remember the fond times and the person's life. Have a correct celebration of the person's life and discuss how you be affected by have them in your enthusiasm no matter how brief. Invite those supervisors as a apposite will gesture.
Otherwise, in attendance is no law or lawful requirement that supervisors allow co-workers a moment to grieve a loss employee. The solitary mandate as outlined in your member of staff handbook on what is established as funeral be off would apply.
Good luck and much prayers during your time of loss
I'd have to know profoundly more about the circumstances earlier I could form an opinion. It sounds a bit over-the-top, but I don't know adjectives the sides to this issue.
I could see a possibility there might be some judgment for a reprimand under spot on circumstances. But those circumstances would at best be extremely rare, and I would focus simply correcting the employee would be more constructive than issuing a reprimand.
By the course, as a civil service employee, in attendance were at lowest possible two occasions that I received reprimands I considered unjustified. I never asked for grievance endeavour because I felt that would merely compound the problem.
Something resembling that happened on my tremendously prestigious job. They call it Gossip and rumors when it was true. It is senseless and as a Student within Counseling that was a Five Way whammy.
1st the shock of the sudden loss
2nd not mortal able to grieve the loss of a friend and co-worker
3rd not individual given time to recover
4th the Supervisors are path too green to lead anybody anywhere they are hard, ruthless and are automatons in inevitability of serious therapy. They are bordering on Megalomania. Those within higher positions should suspend the Supervisors and bestow an apology to the workers that were notify people of the the loss of a fellow worker.
5th Professional Grief Counselors should be on foot to help beside the grieving process.
Most Employers need to re-evaluate their handling of human resources and Supervisory staff and take a file out of Google employees Handbook. Stop man Asinine towards their employees that are hired labor Not Slaves. Sometimes employer make the Mistake of wanting to protract a hardline profit over the happiness of those they exploit. The result is poor productivity, high turnover rates within employment and sagging profits.
What do you do if an employer make promises more or less benefits and will not keep them very soon (regarding paying taxes)
I (as well as atleast 5 other people) be hired within a 3 month span of time (approximately 8-10 month ago) and told when we be hired that a benefit of the job is that the employer would repay a percentage of our federal tax. While not a soul has this documented from the employer, atleast 6 individuals are able to verify it and running has in words stated that they did say it but did not be a sign of it in that road (now covering it up so they don't have to pay). It be initially presented as a job "perk" (as near are no others with the job). Several workers have quit over this and we are adjectives going to be heavily taxed, as they own only be withholding 6% of tax (not adequate to cover taxes in PA). Is in attendance legal recourse?Answers: It sounds approaching the company is only paying the employer portion of FICA and has not be withholding the other FICA, state and federal taxes. Companies do not pay your taxes for you. They must withhold them and distribute this money quarterly to the IRS and state. They cant give you a 1099 at the extension of the year since you are not an independent contractor. You will actually be liable for the taxes that they did not near hold. You need to christen the IRS and report them ASAP. They will be fined and you may be able to work out a expenditure plan with the IRS.
Employers are required to earnings a portion of the tax and insurance by regulation and to the employer it is considered part of the "benefits" even though you as an hand do not seem to see any "real" benefit. If you be self employed you would have to settle this tax yourself.
So they are recitation the truth, you are just seeing it from another stance.
When a company says they will a clear a percentage of your federal tax, steer clear. The money they are supposedly going to use to recompense the tax is money withheld from your paycheck anyway. Why not tolerate you pay full taxes, but allow you a highly developed rate of pay?
More Questions and Answers:
[619] - [2419] - [1038] - [1720] - [68] - [1196] - [209] - [2261] - [2040] - [165] - [70] - [986] - [2263] - [1465] - [1803] - [1527] - [2345] - [1458] - [661] - [2122]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: