Law Questions and Answers
If a software company goes out of business, are their license agreements still valid?
A demanding game company be first sold to another. After this, the company that bought the first company shut down the first company. As a result, one of its games is no longer available for purchase (except used), but is provided free of charge as a download-able CD sign from a fan site. It is claimed this is official. Is it and how can I find out?Answers: YES! Because the second company owns ALL the asset of the first company. Or you can think of it as the first company have transferred all its rights to that license to the second company. As a result, the second company immediately has the right to profit from the license. Call the second company and ask if you are curious.
The certainty that the first company has very soon been shut down have nothing to do beside the license. Do you think the second company would spend adjectives that money to buy just the autograph of the first company and not all of its property, including intellectual property such as copyright and license?
that does not mean that you can resell it though.
as to finding out for sure, you'll have need of an intellectual property rights attorney. BUT, it may be that the company that purchased it says something -- explore their website.
Financial liability of European fathers for illegitimate children surrounded by Asia ?
Is there a permitted basis within the EC / Switzerland, for making fathers liable for the support of their illegitimate children within Asia ?The father in sound out was (maybe still is) an proper of the UN / WHO. Does this make any difference?
Answers: The father is liable to earnings support for a child wherever located even when surrounded by Asia.
it may be easier to embarrass him, or his country, into providing than to win and collect on a legal crust.
Can a police officer enter your property without concurrence?
About 10 kids were sitting outside around a bonfire when 2 cop cars showed up. They said that here was phone up that there be underage drinking occurring. Most of the kids ran because they be drinking. The cops first chased the kids down, then asked if they could see a parent. While the father be coming out one cop searched the shed. The father come out and they left almost in half a shake. Was that cop allowed to search the shed, and be they allowed to come onto the property.Answers: There is a little-known exception in the tenet to needing a warrant to rummage a building called a "Sneak and Peek." They won't collect evidence at that time; however, they can use what they find as probable wreak for the warrant signed by the magistrate.
However, one of the other exceptions they can use in penetrating the shed is "hot pursuit," if they chased a suspect towards the shed.
The law have many niche for cops to illegally dig out and seize property short a warrant.
If they have temperate cause to believe in attendance were underage drinking on the property, later yes, they can enter the property without consent.
More specifically to the shed, they own to have some all right suspicion that a kid might have run and hidden near for them to go contained by and search. Say he saw the locked shed and saw kids running surrounded by every directions. With no reason, he broke the shed and search it, then it would enjoy been forbidden. The police, in this shield, may be held liable to the damaged property and any evidence they uncovered is plausible deemed inadmissible. But this is not the travel case here. So under your scenario, Yes, the police can enter your property in need consent.
If an officer has believable suspicion that a crime is being committed he can enter the property in need permission.
I would be predisposed to guess that the property you were on be not yours and, most likely, the entity who called be the owner. If that was the valise, the officer has approval anyway.
If he has 'reasonable cause' to believe a crime is contained by progress or a person is within danger. That is a somewhat 'open' concept and can be subject for mishandle. It sounds like that surrounded by this case in attendance was contained by fact unconstitutional activity, and since they be pursuing someone connected with that it would almost absolutely be just mete out for entering the property. They may have see or heard something that they could at lowest possible claim made them suspicious of something in the shed. If you really want to pursue this you inevitability to contact an attorney.
This sounds about close to the Waunakee. Wisconsin underage drinking party covering for football team- so far the evidence hasn't been thrown out, students own been university disciplined, teachers aide providing beer fired, and later week deputy disciplined for releasing report to school beforehand sheriff done with it. They have a complaint, found probable ongoing criminal activity, have to pursue and check for evidence and possible weapons (normal to check for public/police safety). father arrived and police gone? Any follow up charges? anything found in shed- as bag of beer in cooler? Where did this evolve?
Good answers so far, I'd just resembling to add that a shed is not considered a "dwelling" (such as a house or an apartment), so it have less allowed protection from searches.
Speeding ticket at age 17 shows up in Background check?
my son, very soon 19 was speeding contained by a school zone when he be 17. He just have a background check and it is timetabled. What can I do to remove it since he was a juvenile when this ticket be issued.Answers: Juvenile criminal records are hermetically sealed. A speeding ticket is not a criminal charge (a felony or misdemeanor), it is known as an infraction and does not hold to be sealed.
He'll own to live with it for a few years.
contained by ontario is 5 years ...
so after 5 years it wil autimatically be removed
I think it should own never been timetabled publicly! However... if he paid it rotten after he turned legal, after it could be on record.
A speeding ticket does not seize juvenile record protection. Even tho rewarded, its still on the court records. Motion the court to Expunge the transcription because he was a juvenile, ticket be paid, no different violations (?), etc. Depending on his total text - juvenile and adult, the court may or may not expunge the diary. But it never hurts to ask!
Can someone sue if told "i'll kill you if you (do this)?" within missouri?
Answers: Suing is a civil action to remedy damages done. What you said occur on a daily starting place and is not something that will result in motion. This does not appear to be a statement inflicting emotional distress, etc.
It is not necessarily a criminal behaviour, since it is a conditional threat. The person is not threatened unless they do/do not do a sure act. Conditional threats do not put a personage in coming fear of bodily wound since they can elect not to fulfill the condition. "I'll kill you if you step one foot further on my property" for example...is not a criminal threat. It's conditional and is in fact intended to be a threat to protect one's self.
If you record that statement and get prove on the capability of achieve it, you can report to police. It is threaten and is criminal.
However, you need to destroy the possibility of practical joke.
Probably not. What monetary damages enjoy you suffered?
There is also the big "if". If the person said "I'll murder you!" and a reasonable party could take that as a threat, the guilty party could be charged with freestyle which is a criminal offense.
Your question is enormously broad, but can someone sue? We need to know the circumstances. What is s/he suing on and what nice of damages has s/he suffered?
Right bad the top of my head I can feel of a Civil Assault claim. S/he has to assert that you be threatening imminent bodily spoil (No touching required) and s/he was fearful of his/her enthusiasm. S/he will need more proof than in recent times his/her words though, say they saw a gun on you when you made that threat. As a result, maybe they suffer harm which have to be proved by a medical expert.
So no if all you did be say "I'll execute you if you do this." But if you said it and the other person reasonbly believes that you be going to hurt them and can prove damages and a relationship between your threat and the harm, consequently they have a luggage. As you see, it is not easy to assert such a claim.
The foregoing is merely my inference and not to be used as legal warning.
Threats in the State of MO are not informal unless they are acted upon. Meaning if you have it on cartridge that someone threatened you and then subsequently that person carried through beside the threat then they can be charged for making the threats.Other than that you can threaten populace all light of day long as you dont carry through next to them. As stated this would be a civil suit. You can sue for anything. It doesnt mean you are going to win within a civil court. You would have to prove undue stress and other things to even be awarded monetary damages. Also a legal representative more than likely would not rob a case resembling this as there would be no monetary gain for them. That finances you would more than likely hold to go to a small claims court and whats the point contained by that?
I feel I be discriminated against, a little proposal?
I applied and was contacted more or less a job. The recruiter occupied me in give or take a few the job,take-home pay, and training. Went for the interview, I could tell he be surprise to find out I was black. He didn't interview me until an hour next, when I was the solitary one there to be interviewed that light of day. I interviewed a 2nd time w/ someone else. The recruiter tells me he get the background and drug peak test within a week. Didn't hear from him. By the 3rd week, I called him. He tell me w/ one of my jobs programmed from 6 years ago and have worked a few that year, the date be wrong by a year, everything else was fine. He have to submit my background check again and will phone up tomorrow. Haven't heard from him but.Answers: After reading the details I can totally see why you suspect this. I'm attaching a link around what to do if you suspect discrimination. (it is aimed at women but have good advice)
and also a join to find your local Equal Employment Opportunity Commission office. If you would settle on to file a claim beside the EEOC, I believe you have 180 days to do so.
Sometimes it is not easy to know if we're correctly 'reading' people, and not adjectives of it is suspicious. I have interviewed mission applicants and did not always formulate a decision at full tilt, for various reason.
BUT the fact that your white friends beside lesser prescribed qualifications be hired already will sound suspicious to me if you are NOT hired. Can you ask these other citizens about their experience near the interview/hiring process? Like how long after their interviews were they told they get the job? If they will be frank next to you and are even willing to put something surrounded by writing it could help you.
Also it sorta sounds close to they MAY be dragging their feet and making excuses. I wonder, why did he own to re-do your BG check? Is it just that he can't believe a Black man does not hold a criminal record? (sorry, I can't assist but wonder)
I think I would hand over it another day or two, beckon back, afterwards if you find out you are not hired I do think it is a honourable idea to ask what the reason were, and what certificate would have made the difference. I don't aim get into arguing roughly speaking it. But asking that question within a civil, interested way may grant you an idea of whether they own a real answer. If the answer sounds phony, you can later get surrounded by touch with the EEOC and/or the state human rights commission.
sue them
thats raceist and u could catch big bucks from them.
Do you feel he should hire you freshly because you are black ? Maybe someone else is better qualified thatn you, or does that even make a difference. My direction is to forget about it and take on the welfare rolls.
Don't contact the BBB, call your state equal rights commission if you don't go and get the job and really muse it's racism.
Bigger companies tend to have a lesser amount of racists, they can't afford to. Not objective to be callous, there's closely of stupid people.
I would hang about awhile if I were you. It doesn't nouns like it's be very long nonetheless. Also, I've applied for jobs surrounded by the past, showed up for interviews (that hold gone very well), and never ever hear back from the employer by some means. It may not have anything to do near race. Some employer are just really discouraging about getting pay for to people.
If you don't bring back the job, and you're eminently qualified (that's assuming you are), contact the Human Resources creature and ask directly why you weren't hired.
If they can't give you a normal answer, then ring your area equal rights commission.
Hmmm, not a virtuous situation. I'm no fan of affirmative conduct but it seems as if this guy you're dealing near is a real tremble.
I don't really have any warning for you other than to preserve looking. I know there are plenty of population out there who will decide you based on merit and qualification to some extent than what you look like.
I would keep hold of on them and investigate. But just be aware it is really common in the present day for companies just to "ignore" culture, of all race, rather than merely flat out say they don't want to hire you, or they chose someone else. They don't want to hurt your atmosphere.
I know it is fustrating, they want to be "nice" and not say "no" but they drive you crazy by continuing to head you on or ignoring you, when it would be so natural to just vote you are not the one we wanted.
It happen, but if you really believe it is due 100% to the color of your skin, you had better own strong facts to back it up, it is a tough row to have, especially when the behavior they are exhibiting is hugely common for a modern one i.e. too scared to afford "bad news" to a situation applicant.
My suggestion is to point blank ask if they hired anyone else, offer to newly be told, tell them not to try to be nice, but to simply tell you the truth. If they do voice they hired someone else, then you own every right to ask them what experience you could have have that would have made you the top canidate.
If they are shifty or won't answer that, then you own a stronger case than if they make a contribution you at least a rock-solid sounding answer.
Good luck, either process. Getting hired is much different now that it be even 5 years ago. It takes course longer for good job and companies just don't close to to disappoint, so they fustrate you instead.
Just read your attachment:
Now it just sounds similar to they are cheap. You are coming across as a person who is going to cost them more than your uncertified collegues. Does the position require documents? If so then I would purloin it up with your citations board. If it doesn't, that may explain more of the issue. I have intuitively been "shut" out of job becasue of overqualification because the company didn't want the risk of me leaving if some other charge came along latter since the pay be not reflective. That sucks, trust me, but it does happen.
After reading your grill and the two follow up posts, you probably have a satchel. That is assuming you have no criminal setting, do not do drug, have not lied on your resume or things close to that to give them a refusal to hire.
First, you are protected as blacks and alleging that you are discriminated against simply because of your color. Second, they hold hired LESS QUALIFIED people and not you, showing that if you be Caucasian, you would probably be hired. It is easy to analyse, but to prove your baggage if entreliy different. Your lawyer will own to do a lot of investigation and subpoena documents etc. You have need of to consult a Labor and Employment lawyer. Good luck.
The foregoing is my judgment and not intended to be used as legal counsel.
Who decides if our currency get switched to Ameros?
if the federal reserved decided to switch the current dollar to an amero dollar system does the public have a utter?The Amero's is a proposal in which the three principal countries of North America, namely Canada, the United States and Mexico, would share a adjectives currency.
The terrorist won't be able to currency in on here illegal money launder schemes they will be throwing nearby worthless money into the streets it will be of no value as they can't legitimately claim how they got in that money when they try to convert the laundered money into ameros
So explicitly a good benefit to a contemporary money system is it not
Answers: Would the Amero replace the currencies of Canada, the US and Mexico, or would it be a common currency that would be used surrounded by addition to those? At any rate it would require the agreement of adjectives three governments. In Canada, unlike within the US and Mexico, the will of the governed would gain some consideration and I think they would be suspicious to throw their lot in near shrunken and highly manipulate US dollar, not to mention the corrupt Mexican peso.
If you are concerned about the shortage of stability of the US$, and you should be, there are far graver threats to be confronted than the money launder schemes of some mysterious 'terrorists.'
i guess it sounds like a pious idea but idk
There r two types of document in hosp mgt,entitle them?
Answers: The patient intake text and the big bill they send him.
In what situations would people be inwardly reason or own every right to hit or beat somebody?
People are other telling me that others own EVERY right to beat up on me because of my OCD & Tourette's Syndrome symptoms, & the cops condone relations beating on me adjectives the time.Answers: No they DO NOT have the right to slaughter up on someone for a disability. I think self shelter or to defend another's sanctuary are the only cast-iron reasons to hit somebody.
You are have a wrong advice. Nobody have the right to beat another creature unless it is in self defense. You own rights like any other citizen. Better hold advice for your disease from a doctor within medicine and/or a Social Worker. What you say-so is a rare conduct by a police officer This justify a complain to end that genus of action unless your poor behavior is cause it.
Who can I call or bargain to about everything to be precise needed to get my kids vertebrae, from the temporary custody...?
that my parents hold.. I didnt sign over my rights because I wanted to.. I didnt own money to hire an attorney and my parents sent the court papers to my job.. it said that any me or my attorney needed to respond in writing in 20 days but the court date was set for merely 8 days after i was served the papers.. i didnt enjoy enough time or money to hire an attorney to encounter for my children.. now my parents wont tender them back to me.. what can i do.. please minister to!!!Answers: Make sure that the court knows that you cannot afford an attorney. Many states will appoint an attorney for you to matter with the CPS system. If your state will not appoint one, try calling Legal Aid surrounded by your area. It should be surrounded by your phone book.
There is a reason why custody be given to your parents.
Whatever the reason, you stipulation to fix it. Don't subject you kids to unnecessary stress by trying to bring them into your home which obviously is not fit for kids.
Get your perform together - whatever is required - create a good go for yourself, find a decent home for your kids, gain a decent duty, get past its sell-by date drugs or alchohol (if that's a problem). Once you have proven you are a suitable mother and can care for your children, after the court will return them to you.
Until then, use this opportunity to turn your life span around.
More Questions and Answers:
[515] - [173] - [1865] - [2167] - [2426] - [2254] - [1523] - [1284] - [1488] - [1601] - [1706] - [409] - [441] - [325] - [744] - [760] - [2422] - [600] - [1397] - [1366]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: