Law Questions and Answers
Can the court system make someone on welfare wages fines & costs ?
" Can the court system make someone on welfare settle fines & costs ? "The other option is community service, but I meditate it's ridiculous to send me fines & costs tickets posted next to a warrant for my arrest.
They are small charges, and I'm no genius, but you can't jump to jail for disorderly conduct tickets, or can you ?
( If they really looked-for to force me to make a pocket money, and I refused after them giving me probability, how much jail time could someone attain for having disorderly conduct tickets ?? )
CHECK OUT THE BIGGEST PART OF MY STORY: " I be given almost all my fines for playing my stereo loud "
I'm slightly bi-polar next to mood swings, and I was usually drunk playing my radio, and didn't realize the cops be coming, I can't believe that in my small town, that the cops have nothing better to do, but bequeath me tickets every time I played my radio loud, and of course I'd forget almost it 3 years later. Just to be reminded of how undue cops & judges are.
Answers: A fine is a fine no business the ability to salary; of course they can.
Of course you can stir to jail for them. Probably not for long; but still
Get your workshy butt off welfare.
I work near someone who is Bi-polar, and she isn't "slightly bi-polar".
It's no excuse not to work.
Yes they can and they should.
If you can't (or don't want to) pay you can other sit in send to prison until your fee is compensated. they will have a set amount of money they will embezzle off the fine for respectively period you sit surrounded by jail. (they did surrounded by Texas) I was wacky when I got a fine that I didn't know just about it or I would have sit in lock away all weekend to settle up it off.
Yes. The reality of being disabled or on welfare does not within any way negate your obligation under the ruling. We live in a society ruled by tenet; it tries for fairness but as in adjectives human endeavors perfection is inattainable. In the USA you live in a democracy. The process to make change in the imperative is through democratic processes. If you feel you are the target of injustice there are ways within a democratic society to try and make change.
Personally, if you were drunk and playing your radio loudly plenty to disturb me, I would call the police too. Other populace have the right to live contained by their homes without individual blasted by other people's music, you know.
See TATE V. SHORT. This case established that if you are too poor to earnings a fine they cannot put you in secure unit merely because you are indigent, what the court will do is work out an installment plan for you to pay the fine. Here is the join:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ge...
Yes you can go to send to prison. Not so much for the tickets, but if you fail to settle your fines and/or agree to the terms of the court by a guaranteed date you can have a bench warrant issued for end to comply and failure to pay packet fines and fee. How much time you seize or what happens is up to the go-between.
Secondly, you being drunk or bi-polar are irrelevant, they own nothing to do beside you making poor choices. A judge will not contemplation if you were intoxicated at the time, If you received more than one ticket for alike offense you should have cultured your lesson after the first time.
You should be thankful you haven't already be placed in top-security prison. If you are on welfare that is irrelevant to. Just because your poor doesn't denote you get free miss for breaking the law. You can't hold your cake and eat it too.
Lets make criminals work more?
I right to be heard if you have committed a desperate crime you should become pretty much a free labor slave to society. Why do we pay adjectives this money to house criminals when they are owing us?Answers: How many raincoat can I make contained by one day?
Because slavery devalues Labor. That's why the Antebellum South have a few rich folks and a lot of poor ones. And, appreciation to the downward pressure on wages caused by Chinese Slave Labor and Indian Child Labor, the majority of culture using government Social Serivces work full time in need making ends meet--making Welfare the biggest Corporate giveaway going. Bringing back slavery contained by the US would just engineer the situation worse.
But we already make criminals work more through Drug Laws. It's be known for more than 40 years that partially of all Street Crime, is the result of the artificially soaring prices the government sets for against the law drugs. Another quarter is committed by career criminals who could be put away for keep if we had the resources to prosecute them effectively and the prison bed to keep them for long sentences.
Thus, a coherent Drug policy that emphasized preservation and Rehabilitation could cut street crime by 75% Substantially reduce Drug Law related crime and the rest of it get a lot cheaper and easier to touch. Plus, the gangs wouldn't be so capably funded.
What we're really paying for is the triumph of "Morality" and Authoritarianism over sound policy and Common Sense.
While living within Alabama I nosed around to see how firm it was for a soul incarcerated. Come to find out, they have: air-condition-cable-clothing- floating meals - thaw out in the winter and -access to phones and the Internet. They enjoy a yard to play near their inmates and socialize. Not only that they acquire a certain amount of dollars for one there and they don't own to pay taxes, support their selves, they attain free housing and medical. What's wrong with this picture? I thought if they committed a crime, they are to be punished.
I spoke beside one person that have a brother that had basically been released and he have went to the nearest store. While contained by the store he told the clerk to give him adjectives of his money. The clerk did, the robber then told him to send for the police, that he would be waiting right outside. I ask why did he do this. The robber said: I can't deal beside the outside, everything has changed and I'm not competent to work, I have no money, no place to live, and I own no friends, worse yet, I don't approaching my family. He said he looked-for to go home and that's where on earth he went when the police come. The next time he get out, he tried to rob again and was murdered.
A prisoner have more rights than a hard working citizen. A citizen have to, work, pay taxes, support himself and his kith and kin. We have no vote so and get billed for everything plus keep hold of up all prisoners, military, political rich general public, plus the people who are sucking adjectives they can get for free. Somewhere along the smudge I never learned how to suck for senate aid as in food stamps, free medical, or any other item. I either worked or I go hungry and I did several times. So what can we do to make prisoners be punished instead of man rewarded for their crimes? Not a thing!
As for myself, I enjoy never been arrested, not even a moving contravention ticket,,,,,I feel as if I am the one self punished, not the criminals.
What's the difference between a misdemeanor, and summary offense ?
I have out-of-date disorderly conduct tickets, and now I hold a warrant for my arrest, If they don't get the fines and costs money.( The clerk said, " It's one and only a summary offense " - I told her, " If I had to do lock up time over these old tickets, how much time could I gain ? " - She replied by saying, " Nothing " because she herself know how stupid it is to issue a warrant for something so petty )
My mom makes $10 or $20 payments here, and here, but then forgets in the order of it, and every 6 months, or so ... I get these stupid tickets.
I want adjectives the fines & costs erased, the system is being really excessive to someone that recieves a s.s.i check for bi-polar disorder, and can't afford to pay it rotten. In these old tickets, my ill will mental disorder was deeper, and dark. I've gotten out of jail for assault charges, that reduced to misdemeanor charges, and afterwards lowered to what is now a bunch of summary offense tickets. Would the system really progress as low as to make you pay packet something you cant pay ?
Answers: I would suggest contacting a decriminalized aid office within your area and ask almost your options - the relevant law vary from one jurisdiction to another.
I expect that "summary" offense money it had be reduced to the level of a traffic ticket, tho I could be wrong; surrounded by some states these offenses are considered to be low grade misdemeanors.
I am 16 and I'm dating a guy that is 18 is it unofficial in South Carolina? Will it be permitted when I turn 17?
Answers: The age of consent in South Carolina is 16, so you're fine.
It's not illegitimate to date at either age. But if your ask is about sex, it is potential NOT statutory rape since you are 16. If you want to get married you'll inevitability parents' permission.
My suggestion is that you date just until you are a little elder.
There are no laws that restrict "dating". However when you bear it past a grasp to say goodnight is when problems arise. Age of consent within your State is 16 that doe snot mean your BF is out of the woods. Use notify when texting, emailing, phone calls etc adjectives carry Federal regulations. No sex chitchat, chat etc! furthermore even though age of consent is 16 your Father can legally forbid you from seeing this man (yes hes a man) and even want a protective order. So let keep it simple. Dating is fine but if you purloin it further there can be problems and even near no problems Dad can still forbid the relationship and if you disobey him your Bf can be thrown in send to prison
Can my employer change the days and hours that I work lacking my consent and without reproving?
I currently work Sunday to Tuesday and every alternate Wednesday which really suits me. Now there are rumours that my employer wishes to change my hours. What are my rights, I do not want my hours to conveyance! Do they have to present me notice in the past a change resembling this?Answers: This will depend on your length of service and the terms of your contract of employment.
Are you surrounded by the UK?
Do you have a contract?.or something call a Statement of Particulars?
these days employer can usually get away beside this unfortunately
Read your contract, if it states you enjoy to be flexible to suit the needs of your service, next I am afraid you dont have a leg to stand on
This have happened to me surrounded by the past. I live contained by the UK and work for the NHS
Sorry
A verbal contract depending on how long u've be in the duty should suffice to have a typical working routine. Should your employer wish to revise it they have to inform u of their intentions IN WRITING next to a 30 day spot period - for the member of staff to allow discussions to take place and voice their concerns.
If u work contained by a sweat shop ... sorry u r ducked i'm afraid
Depends what is in your contract. If you are individual employed by hours per week and your job includes weekend work, after yes they can. Thats what my contract is, hours per week, and i work for Birmingham City Council. So they can move your hours and days around 'to meet the needs' of the service we are providing. But near me it only happen once in a while due to something resembling being really short staffed.
But if your contract specifies days that you work later they can't, but I would probably guess that your contract would be like mine.
The employer can brand name any changes indispensable to support his business...he doesn't have to hold your permission or endow with you notice.
You, then again, have choices; convert to the new hours or quit.
Yep, they can money it without see.
If you need lasting days off for religious reason, the company would have to accommodate you, but they enjoy to know about the religious necessity, and you hold to ask for the accommodation, and it have to be true, not made up.
For instance, Jews and Moslems observe the morning of rest from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday. Christians generally do a short Sunday.
The answer to your interrogate is that your employers can metamorphosis your hours, providing that they give you a 28 hours of daylight notice spell. The notice of their intention must also be surrounded by writing.
Providing that they do so, then at hand is nothing that you can do.
However, the 28 daytime notice length can be used as a consultation period, to help out you negotiate if you need to.
Thoughts on Krytocracy?
This may be a bizarre question, but who think that krytocracy is a viable form of government? For those who don't know what it is, krytocracy is a form of parliament in which law lords enforce the law by themselves, on an individual idea. Think of the state Israel was surrounded by during the time of the Book of Judges. In my opinion, society are too stupid to follow the law and obligation more incentive to do so. For example, underage drinking--it's illegal, even so so many individuals do it. The best way to stop such practices is to grant a group of enforcers the powers of judge and jury, and allow them to pass out the law. All you would call for are a bunch of people who are practically incorrupt and non-hypocritical, and in attendance you have it. I'm not motto America should be this way, but possibly elsewhere in the world this could work. (I know that they do this sort of entry in the Middle East, but I'm Christian and they don't realy tolerate non-Muslims surrounded by such countries...) I would live in such a state if I could.Answers: Iran have some Christians, even noted to have a Jew within Parliament. Pay your charity tax- zakait(?) and see if you can emigrate there. Judges beside power to enforce? As the Maccabees? Something like a war law situation? Inquisitional court system sort of close to old Spanish, some S American sytems? Judges work as investigating prosecutor would under English adjectives law, make decision of crime committed, enforcement usually police but could be military special section/Gendarme's, or within some crimes a court officer could execute defendant. Code Napoleon replaced Inquisition in Europe mostly- separate prosecutor from judge- but some remnants remain, intermediary has extra powers to compel and investigate compared to American, English Common tenet based systems-Greek at times, Italian, rather on Netherlands courts. Eastern Europe variation have prosecute rs sometimes having quasi- judicial power to determine defendants guilt on consistent crimes, nearest comparison is prosecutor says defendant guilty by his investigation and appearance since judge is more close to appeals court appearance- defendant gates a unsystematic to prove innocence but legal presumption is he have been found guilty and is newly trying to influence sentence by introducing mitigating factors to arbiter, might present new evidence or discredit prosecutor evidence, his responsibility.
Try Iran which would be the wrong religion for you, but the "krytocracy" would clear you feel at home.
Is it legal to pulverize shoplifters?
Answers: no, its caled uneccesary use of force (unless you are assaulted while trying to detain them, if thats the shield then bright and breezy stomping)
pul·ver·ize
Pronunciation: \'pl-v-rīz\
Function: verb
1 : to reduce (as by crushing, battering, or grinding) to very small particle : atomize <pulverize rock>
2 : annihilate, demolish (intransitive verb)
I would say that would classify as murder, so no, it is not allowed.
Nope.. unnecessary use of force. Even if the person is found guilty mere touching can (and habitually does) result in them sueing you, the company and the company can turn around and sue you surrounded by order to collect face.
Was there a drug bust sour travis base park route in equal feild?
fairfieldAnswers: Yes, and they are still looking for you as a material witness.
why how much are your guys dictum they lost of yours?
How can a birthfather who's name be removed from the original birth licence get custody?
He also have already done a paternity test which shows he IS the biological father. The birthmom did deeply of horrible things and eventually her and her family salaried money to remove him.Answers: Where are you? In the US? England? You want custody? Is there a wedding involved with a 'legal' father? Does Navaro grip law apply? You state 'paid money to remove him' - is this cost of court proceeding to amend or officially change the document underneath a state law- or are you stating bribe/illegal change/ falsification of record. Motthers age may be important- state law on grandparents liabilities may allow them custody of minor childs brood.DETAILS NEEDED.
Name is more or less irrelevant. It is used to show the paternity, and within your case, near is DNA evidence to prove that. Custody is usually awarded to either the Birth Mother or the Birth Father, contained by the best interest of the child.
You need a advocate if you want to fight the skin. The above is my opinion and not to be used as allowed advice.
He could emergency that the paternity be restated on the certificate, sue for custody and a paternity testing might be needed again.which he might need to compensate for. His best hope is if he can document and prove his paternity and prove the horrible things she's done. I believe that at least some of what she's done is a felony, but at the thoroughly least a crime. Unless you've signed away your rights to that child or enjoy them taken away by a court of law, your rights as the father never turn away.
What is terrorism?
a question that i be looking for an answer to. please people: i asked that interview to see how different people viewpoint this term. no wiki or google. your own definetions. basically state your age range (under 18, 18-25, 25-40, 40-60, 60 and above), masculinity (male \ female), country of origin, and religion. followed by definetion. much appreciated.Answers: MWM 60 US (Gulf Coast) Agnostic
Terrorism is a attitude and mindset that attempts to modify behavior of others through instilling a fear of antagonism into these others. Terrorism seeks appeasement... throw them a bone, so to speak. When what they deserve is to throw them a live grenade beside the pin already out. Terrorists are bullies who never learned to recognize how hurtful their actions are, or they are psychopaths who don't CARE.
A minor characteristic is that the intelligent terrorist KNOWS his/her concept are deeply into the minority, unspeakably unpopular, and practically speaking impossible to implement, but s/he wants to push them on everyone else anyway.
Terrorists are a virulent form of sociopathic thug who cannot fathom out why others DON'T want to follow their ideals, and they cannot understand that their ideals are unpopular because they own no merit, no substance, or no fairness.
Terrorism is a way of go that frequently is adopted by those whose lives enjoy been taken over by an belief that is of constrained or no value contained by the real world. Terrorism is a living example of tunnel perception to a goal in need consideration of those through whom you must tunnel.
Terrorists live under the horribly mistaken depression that they are doing good - when within fact they construct themselves and those who harbor them pariahs.
Can you tell I'm not conspicuously in favor of terrorists?
This misconception is one of the most widely held misconceptions more or less Islam today. And yet within the Qur'an, the Creator unambiguously states:
"Nor take go - which Allah has made revered - except for just bring. And if anyone is slain wrongfully, we have given his descendant authority (to demand retaliation or to forgive): but tolerate him not exceed bounds in the thing of taking life, for he is help (by the Law)." [Al Isra:33]
Based on this verse, it is Islamically unlawful to murder anyone who is innocent of definite crimes. It is well to remember at this point the distinction made above between Qur'an and Sunnah, and the Muslims: simply the Qur'an and Sunnah are guaranteed to be in accordance next to what the Creator desires, whereas the Muslims may possibly deviate. Hence, if any Muslim kills an innocent soul, that Muslim has committed a grave sin, and incontestably the action cannot be claimed to own been done "surrounded by the name of Islam."
It should be clear, consequently, that "Muslim terrorist" is almost an oxymoron: by killing innocent family, a Muslim is commiting an awesome sin, and Allah is Just. This phrase is offensive and demeaning of Islam, and it should be avoided. It is hoped that as the standard level of public awareness and comprehension of Islam increases, people will preserve "terrorism" and "Islam" separate from each other, not to be used within the same phrase.
Jihad or Holy War?
Another sense advanced in support of the misconception is that the Creator have imposed `jihad' on us. The term "holy war" is from the time of the Crusades and originate in Europe as a rally cry against the Muslims in Jerusalem. Jihad is an Arabic word explanation struggle, but in the context of abundant verses contained by the Quran, it carries the goal of military struggle, or war. Allah at a snail`s pace introduced the obligation of military struggle to the Muslim community at the time of the Messenger . The first rhyme ever revealed in that nouns is as follows, "Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is ably able to assist them." (Al-Hajj 39)
This elegy lays down the precondition for all war in Islam: within must exist certain brutal conditions on the people. The Creator unequivocally instructions us to fight tyranny and persecution, even at the expense of bloodshed as the following poems shows (translation), "And fight within the cause of Allah beside those who fight beside you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the ends. And kill them somewhere you find them, and drive them out from where they drove you out, and unfair treatment is severer than slaughter, and do not fight near them at the Sacred Mosque (in Makkah) until they fight beside you in it, but if they do encounter you, then slay them; such is the reward of the unbelievers. But if they desist, afterwards surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. And fight near them until there is no unfair treatment, and religion should be only for Allah, but if they desist, later there should be no nouns except against the oppressors." (Al-Baqarah 190-192)
As one might imagine, the method of military struggle have been clearly and extensively defined within the Qur'an and Sunnah. Since this subject is a huge one, we simply summarize part of it by note that it is unlawful to kill women, children, the infirm, the elderly, and the innocent. From the Sunnah, specifically in the study of the Sunnah call Sahih Bukhari, we find: Narrated 'Abdullah: "During some of the Ghazwat (battles) of the Prophet a woman was found kill. Allah's Apostle disapproved the killing of women and children." (Al-Bukhari 4:52:257)
A related misconception to jihad is normally propagated by Muslims who say that "Jihad is merely for self-defense of physical borders." The Qur'an and Sunnah refute this notion categorically. As the verse cited above show, jihad is obligatory where there is injustice, and Muslims requirement not acknowledge imaginary lines around the dust when it comes to upholding this obligation. The Messenger of Allahr have also commented on this extensively in the Sunnah. From the study of the Sunnah call Sahih Bukhari, we find that, Narrated Abu Musa: "A man came to the Prophet and asked, 'A man fight for war booty; another fight for fame and a third fight for showing off; which of them fight in Allah's Cause?' The Prophet said, "He who fight that Allah's Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights contained by Allah's Cause."
Hence, the Creator obligates us to punch-up wherever individuals are being grossly deprived of freely audible range or practicing the Message of Allah as contained in the Qur'an and Sunnah. Sayyed Qutb, a familiar Muslim scholar eloquently discusses the notion of jihad and self-defense contained by his book Milestones, "If we insist on calling Islamic jihad a defensive movement, after we must change the implication of the word `defense' and mean by it `defense of man' against adjectives those elements which limit his freedom. These elements bring the form of beliefs and concepts, as well as of political systems, base on economic, cultural, or class distinction."
Judicial Sytem of Islam:
A third reason habitually cited for the misconception about Islam which say that this way of enthusiasm tolerates the killing of innocents is that the judicial system of Islam is unnecessarily raucous. This reason is anodyne in two respects. First, it presupposes that human beings are more freshly and more merciful than the Creator, and therefore we can alter the law. Second, it is normally based on gross oversimplifications of Islamic tenet, such as saying "adjectives theives get their hand cut off!"
The Qur'an and Sunnah form it clear that the law of retaliation (or equality) govern us for murder and physical injury, but forgiveness is better as the following verses from the Qur'an show (translation), "The give back for an injury is an injury equal thereto (in degree): but if a person forgives and make reconciliation, his reward is due from Allah: for (Allah) loves not those who do wrong. But indeed if any do help and watch over themselves after a wrong (done) to them, against such there is no mete out of blame. The blame is only against those who persecute men and insolently transgress beyond bounds through the land, defy right and justice: for such near will be a grievous penalty. And whoever is merciful and forgiving, these most surely are actions due to courage." [42:40-43]
The Creator ordained the directive of retaliation on us knowing full well that we might cross-question it. In many non-Muslim societies today, nearby are ongoing debates around the death cost. In Islam, this discussion is moot: the Creator has granted the matter for us. He have however given us an interesting verse contained by the Qur'an which advises to consider the thing carefully if we want to deduce it : "And there is natural life for you in (the regulation of) retaliation, O people of reading, that you may guard yourselves." [Al-Baqara :179]
Most people are also ignorant of the stringent conditions which must be met for the law of retaliation to be applicable. The Sunnah is full of examples of the Messenger of Allah showing us when the law's preconditions be fulfilled. For example, a thief is with the sole purpose liable to lose his or her hand if the item stolen exceeds a abiding value, and if it is proven that the item be taken from its normal resting place. Stealing food is not punishable by the loss of one's foot, and other items are exempt as well. This is purely an example of how gingerly the law is applied surrounded by Islam. However, penalties contained by Islam are meant to establish peace and warranty for the society.
The Sword of Islam:
Finally, another reason advanced for this prevalent misconception is that Islam `spread by the sword'. It should be clear by immediately that we must always distinguish between the Qur'an and Sunnah and the Muslims when it comes to determining what the Creator have asked of us. Allah has stated clearly surrounded by the Qur'an (translation), "There is no compulsion surrounded by religion; truly the right way have become clearly distinct from error; therefore, whoever rejects Satan (and what he call to) and believes in Allah, he indeed have laid hold on the firmest handhold, which shall not break off, and Allah is Hearing, Knowing." [Al-Baqarah:256]
Hence, it is impossible to adopt Islam under duress. Even if misguided Muslims be to try to `force' Islam somehow on others, it would not be accepted by the Creator base on this verse. Historical arguments that try to demonstrate that Muslims did not `convert others by force' are truly secondary to the argument given above. However, it is worth note that historically, Islam did spread by peaceful resources.
The Message of the Creator was introduced within Africa and southeast Asia by trading Muslims. However, the people started converting to it surrounded by big numbers when the Muslims liberated them from the clutches of the cruel rulers who used to excise then heavily and loot precious belongings from them whenever they need so. And today the largest Muslim country in the world is Indonesia. The military expeditions that lead to the conquest of large swathes of realm in Europe and intermediate Asia were adjectives marked by tolerance of other creeds and hope.
More Questions and Answers:
[1282] - [978] - [1783] - [1148] - [1910] - [930] - [2205] - [2216] - [1539] - [2058] - [558] - [675] - [1974] - [313] - [1632] - [2346] - [1518] - [1784] - [1608] - [655]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: