Law Questions and Answers

How can I sue ?

I think an ex- post a video xtube What should I do? It be against my rights.

Answers: If you have proof of a video, can show it be in the exclusive possession of the x, it will be a step contained by the right direction

will need to confer to a lawyer to see if you enjoy legal recourse, not an unforced suit to file or proof, plus have to subpoena utube for access

The first thing you entail to do is verify whether or not it is there. If so, if what he posted be done in front of a third gala, you probably lost all privacy rights you might enjoy had if it be just between the two of you.

** Note: This is a standard discussion of the subject matter of your cross-question and not legal counsel. Local laws or your fussy situation may change the broad rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult permissible counsel with whom you can discuss adjectives the facts of your case. **

Should a jury look at the small details or the big picture in a criminal travel case?

What if the small details lead the jury to stray away from what is central in the baggage? What if the big picture makes the jury not observe the relative things that are important surrounded by the case?

Answers: The jury's career is to weigh the evidence and determine what is important and what is not. By definition your hypothetical have no place in the system because the jury define what is important.

EVIDENCE speaks louder afterwards words. In some cases when the evidence don't quite append up, then they should consider looking at every detail possible. Its a concrete thing to speculate.

Ticket should i fight it? i be rear done but i got the ticket?

On December 10, 2007 I be driving south on us hwy 19 exiting off the East Bay exit. To where on earth I proceeded to move into the far right lane with turn signal on, I be about partially way olden the 1986 Volvo when she proceeded to move without a turn signal I within turn beeped to agree to her know I was in that and sped up to avoid getting hit. After turning on to East Bay the 1986 Volvo pulled up beside me and threw something at my window (which departed a scratch on my car) and proceeded to try to speed rotten. I accelerated to win in front of her and communicate her to pull over. As I pulled within front of her the car contained by front of me braked and then I braked. Upon braking the 1986 Volvo flipside ended me not once but twice. She hit me and I pulled forward a few and she again hit me. We be in the center lane so I pulled rotten to the side of the road and she followed but pulled in front of me. As I exited my vehicle a girl who claimed to be her friend got within my face and be yelling at me. I told the girl to subsidise out of my face

Answers: Oh hell yes disagree this, 19 and east bay i.e. Fla. and in Fla the one who reverse ends someone is ALWAYS at fault its the statute you are supposed to be in control of your vehicle at adjectives times I can guarantee that a judge will throw this out and you should contact the supervisor of the officer who be obviously bias towards you and enjoy the case looked into they threw a stony missile (that is the terminology used) at you to be exact a felony you should take pics of the gash for evidence this cop did not do his job.

WOW, what a story of road viciousness. If the info on the ticket is wrong, you can fight it surrounded by court. I suggest getting a lawyer to represent you when you travel. That will cost a few dollars, but well worth it.

You can also help yourself to the other driver to civil court and get a shrewdness against her for the damage on your sports car and have her take-home pay to get it fixed. If she does not show up, you should automacially be award the sensitivity.

Good luck.

If you hit you pay, without a doubt your car be the one that got hit...but I am sure that other associates saw when you cut her off and slam your breaks on her ...cause her to hit you...which is not only consider as "road rage" but immature driving. If this "witness" was a passenger contained by the Volvo you have to prove it and that could oblige you a little but I really doubt it. Get a advocate, but ultimately will cost you more than paying for the tickets. By the way, expect your insurance to increase big time.
Next time, the best piece to handle a situation when someone throws something at your coup�� is to write down the license plate number and call police, DON'T RUN IN FRONT OF THE CAR AND SLAM THE BREAK ON THEM TO MAKE THEM STOP, you can fall up hurting Innocent people.

EDIT: if she be in another coup��, she is a very virtuous credible witness. sorry you are screwed

What you did was stupid but specifically not the point as whats done is done and the question is surrounded by what to do now.

You really should bring a lawyer. Now this may cost a bit but if you can bring back this reduced or dropped it will save you thousands over the subsequent few years. Plus even though were hit from the subsidise if convicted her insurance company can refuse to reward any of your damages. And if your insurance company has to remuneration for either vehicle consequently it will be the same. rates move about up.

Another reason you want a lawyer is because if you recount any portion of your story to the judge he is going to throw the book at you and he probably will anyway. He will see it that something thrown is no aim to try to force a vehicle off the road.

A legal representative speaking for you could possibly frame it in a unshakable light. Maybe he can work w. the reality that the officer just ticketed you short hearing your side. But consequently the judge will enunciate OK, tell it immediately. A lawyer can inform you what to say because if you said it resembling you did here you will be toast.

Get a lawyer because you really call for one.

Water-boarding. Interrogation?or Torture?

If waterboarding has not long occupancy consequences on the physical health and cause no permanent twinge, is it a legitimate cross-examination technique? And if not, how does one reconcile an attack on innocent American citizens that could be avoided by using the technique to extract information? What's more earth-shattering? The lives of innocent Americans or temporary discomfort of a terrorist?

Answers: 1. Here is the interview for "torture". Would you be okay with the technique if it be used on your child. If the answer is no, then it is torture.

2. During the Witchhunts, Nazi alarm and even the Roman empire, use of torture was widely documented. We in a minute know that 99.99999% of the information obtained be BS. If I were waterboarded I would come clean to being a witch, flying on a broom, worshiping the devil, butchery Jesus or anything you wanted to hear that would put together the pain stop.

John McCain who be held in a detention military camp and tortured says that torture does not give up any truthful information.

That is all I want to know about it.

It is desolate that this is what we have become.

Those that trade freedom, for safekeeping, deserve neither, nor will they have it.

I've said ti back and I'll say it again.

Everyone know (CIA, DIA, FBI, NSA, military) that torture yields no adjectives information so your second argument is moot.

Also since our government admit that the vast majority of detainees are innocent (Bush say 70%, Red Cross 90%+), how do you justify torturing innocent populace for useful information?

BTW, it's interogation when it's done to someone else. It's torture when it's done to you.

Oh and it could be argued that rape cause "no long term consequences on the physical strength and causes no unchanging pain", so it must be legitimate also. Ridiculous argument.

You come bad as trying to sound equitable one way or another, but after you ask this unfair examine: "What's more important? The lives of innocent Americans or stopgap discomfort of a terrorist?" Because... YOU have no theory what kind of "discomfort" these "interrogation techniques" wreak.

Also, not everyone that is held, is a terrorist. Innocent ancestors should not be tourtured.

It appalls me how many Americans are adjectives of a sudden ok with these things immediately that there's a "war on fright." 20 years ago, there would own been riots surrounded by the streets if our government even suggested something similar to the stuff that takes place presently.

The number of people that assume everyone surrounded by Guantanamo is guilty, even though hardly any in fact are, and will probably never get the arbitrary to prove their innocence, because all of a sudden we don't enjoy a Bill of Rights anymore. We move them to Cuba to avoid the inconvenience of having to treat someone close to a human, and half the country is ok next to that.

I think we should brand it a policy to snatch up a Guantanamo supporter each week and in recent times hold him down there for a couple of years. Remind them every hours of daylight that they didn't do anything wrong, we're just afraid they might someday.

It is a torture technique. If that, it is a torture technique as per the Government of the USA who prosecuted a Japanese Officer YuKio Asano (sp?) post WWII for the use of the technique.

It be a method employed by the Gestapo as well as the Japanese and have been deem a torture technique under the Geneva conventions.

torture perchance it will help perchance it won't. so just do it

I get to claim my daughter on taxes this year. If I enjoy a defaulted student loan can they frills my taxes?

I live in minnesota. I compensate child support and am up-to-date on my payments. During the divorce the judge said that if I be up-to-date on my payments then I could claim my daughter on income taxes. I own a garnishment on my student loans can they take my rates money?

Answers: If your daughter doesn't live with you, you can't claim her on your taxes. I have a friend who did this, same situation with a conciliator saying they could, concluded up owing the IRS about $10K contained by taxes and fines. State and local judges cannot override federal charge law. Only the custodial parent that the child lives near for the majority of the tax year is allowed to claim the child as a dependent. And yes, they will pilfer your tax return for default student loans if it was gov't subsidized or guaranteed.

They can and probably will. I know from first paw experience. I did the student loan rehabilitation thing though and immediately im back to commonplace and have most of it remunerated off.
But I get into a default on it also due to one laid off of a living and they took my tax return. Although they will simply take the federal import tax return, if you have a state one they probably wont bring that but I am not guaranteeing they couldnt.

With this 'computer' world nowdays, they know everything so don't be suprised.

Yes. They can take your tariff refund every year until the nouns is repaid. I know this because it happened to us.

They can also maintain your tax settlement if you owe the state money. EX: Your ex got public assistance such as food stamps, welfare and/or medicaid for your child.

Yes,, next to new age technology the govt no's everything..
so don't try to hide anything..

yes.. they can and most likely will lug it.. but that is OK.. consent to them.. cuz it has to be remunerated.. ,, then subsequent year u will get Ur reimbursement.. so don't put it off..

upright luck.. happy holidays.

Entertainment Law: Is there any Talent Agents Code of Ethics within the U.S. or just within the State of Texas?

Answers: Yes. Talent Agencies are governed by the Texas Occupations Code. More information just about the laws regulating talent agencies can be found within the link below.

http://www.license.state.tx.us/talent/ta...

The regulation of talent agencies is imagined a state law situation that may differ slightly from state to state.

The California Labor Code has requirements for talent agents (they enjoy to post a bond, etc) and issues licenses, so agents own to have a license. Contracts between Agents and their Clients hold to be submitted for approval to the Labor commission.

AFTRA, the actor's union for Radio & TV, have a list of requirements for an agency to be "franchised," that is to say, approved by the union. They require an agency to seize another bond and state how much commission an agent can take, etc.

The Association of Talent Agents have put together a list of agency guidelines that their member voluntarily adhere to.

What immoral thing be you thinking an agent could do to you? The bonds protect you from an agent keeping your money.

How can the U.S goverment and the state of Ga. allow workers comp. to starve you out w/ a legit claim?

i had most important back surgery 4-26-07 2 rods and 4 screw from a on the job quirk. that occured on 5-24-06. scence that time i have be feed B/S the unharmed way. even so our govt. and state officals allow this , we are losing all we hold because workers comp.is pulling our chain at every turn next to D/S!!! what could take a phone call for takes weeks beside these clowns, yet the govt. & state allows this !!! But i ponder, what the hell, what should i expect from the United communists states of america!!! justice is found surrounded by a whore house,you want to get screwed be in motion to the court house. why cant some-one investagate this matter the answer is simple, it cuts into somesones see back.and the honest,frozen working americans are the ones who gets screwed. i'm hurt for the rest of my natural life but yet the directive allowes w/c to offer you low offer over long periods ot time until they starve you out. and this is allowed ?? we are communists ruled. only they the U.S. and st. govt. telephone it justice. answer this

Answers: Do even know what communism is?
In America insurance companies are private for profit companies that are more interested contained by pleasing their shareholders than they are paying claims to sick and injured policy holders. That is capitalism not communism. Put the blame where it belongs.

I'm sorry you be hurt, really I am.

But even the idea the you should be taken effort of is a communist ideal. If we stay true to capitalism you would be sh*t out of luck and that would be it. Just a point to remember earlier you go screaming more or less living in the "United communists states of america"

I do hope you attain it worked out though and again I am sorry you were hurt and are have trouble.

I am going thru the same piece, only contained by Illinois. It has be 5 1/2 years now and I enjoy pretty much lost everything. I am disabled and on SSD. Not a heck of a lot of money to try and live on, but it is something. What is a crock though is that if a settlement is ever agreed on, I enjoy to pay the administration back for the SSD payments, which will still depart me with nought.

I really do feel for you and your situation.

Your grip is the PERFECT example of why people should buy their own, private, disability insurance policies. I payment $100 a month and would collect 2/3 of my pay for 7 years, after a 30 daylight waiting period, if I become disabled.

How to Obtain sole parental custody?

My ex husband is in prison, sentenced to 16 years, for lewd and levicious act against a minor. He has the possiblity to be released hasty for good behavior, contained by eight years. I do not want to have to argument over custody after his release, I want it done while he is still incarserated. I am remarried to a wonderful man who would like to justifiably be her father, but I need to hold sole parental custody. I wrote him in prison and asked him to voluntariliy sign over his parental rights, but he refuse. What is the legal proccess for this? What papers stipulation to be filed? Do I inevitability a lawyer? What munificent of lawyer?

Answers: Yes you obligation a lawyer, and one who specializes within family ruling is best.

It is a 2-step process. You sue to terminate his parental rights. It's a intricate case to prove, especially if he contests it. One of the reason he might be contesting it, is that he has the right to appear at the hearing, and any hearing will go and get him out of prison for a couple of days or more. Oh, he'll still be a prisoner, but the scenery will metamorphosis.

The second step is for your current husband to adopt his step-children. Some states have expedited procedures for this. But he can't adopt until the father's rights enjoy been terminated, and that will be a big hurdle.

** Note: This is a broad discussion of the subject matter of your interrogate and not legal direction. Local laws or your finicky situation may change the standard rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult lawful counsel with whom you can discuss adjectives the facts of your case. **

You don't influence what legal jurisdiction you're within.
Distinguish between sole guardianship and sole custody. They are different.
You need sole guardianship so that you own all the permitted power - which would include the power to make a lawful decision in the order of adoption.
A court would have to abandon the father's rights and grant you sole guardianship. You would own to give devout reasons why the court should call off his rights. The circumstances mentioned - imprisonment and sexual mishandle - are quite strong reason in your like better.
You need a family circle lawyer. Check for legally recognized advice centre in your nouns too. Sometimes there are permissible clinics attached to universities that propose legal proposal.

What are some laws that protects authors?

Answers: You seem to enjoy answered your own question.

Copyright is a form of protection provided by the law of the United States (title 17, U. S. Code) to the authors of “original works of authorship,” including literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, and certain other intellectual works. This protection is available to both published and unpublished works.

The Copyright Office website have a number of adjectives circulars to aid in your research. A interconnect to one called "Copyright Office Basics" is provided below.

http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.htm...

I need facts why relatives believe biracial couples shouldnt be allowed?

i dont think it is right i give attention to everyone should have the right to be beside who they want to be but im doing a speech && i got STUCK near this one =/

please help

[p.s. i am biracial myself]

Answers: Focus on the prejudice that biracial couples procure from bigots, and the difficulties that it causes contained by their lives, such as obtaining housing and the type of treatment it evokes from others.

It's immensely difficult to argue for something you know is wrong, but you'll learn from it.

Facts? There are no facts, of late opinions. This seem to be a totally inappropriate topic for a academy speech, especially for someone of mixed race.

Knowing your children are more promising to be picked on is about as close as I could come to an argument, but you repugnance to punish someone for someone else's ignorance.

Just think what population have said to you or your family connections.
1. The kids of interracial couples have identity issues.
2. "Races" shouldn't promote interracial dating/families to preserve their own see. (although race IS a socially constructed word!!! not scientific)

Honestly, I cannot even have an idea that of any more. I am birracial too. What a stupid assignment!! Your teacher is trying to receive everyone to think, but to debate it is a moment ago out there!!!

Until the middle decades of the 20th century (and hopefully not much later), one of the main pseudo-scientific rationales for incongruous interracial marriage be 'miscegenation', the supposed "mixing of the bloods" that occurred when citizens of different races have children. The argument was that this mixing of the bloods would despoil and somehow diminish the bloodline of the superior (generally white) race.

As the view of miscegenation has be discredited, more subtle but no less deleterious reasons enjoy been offered for incongruous interracial marriage. Two of the most adjectives ones relate to the supposed impact on the children who, it is argued, (a) will be torn between two different cultures and thus two different racial identity; and/or (b) will be picked on by other children because of their mixed race.

Sadly, near are still places in the US where on earth (b) is still arguably true. Happily, these places are getting fewer and father between.

Bob Jones, of Bob Jones University esteem, claimed that the Bible forbids interracial marriage, and evidently near are lots of people who buy that crap. The university is still around, though it have relaxed its bans on interracial dating, I believe. Frankly, it's adjectives bull, but at least its an view.

More Questions and Answers:
[920] - [297] - [1085] - [2514] - [1880] - [2317] - [1029] - [1698] - [621] - [1439] - [846] - [1299] - [1361] - [693] - [600] - [2342] - [987] - [1720] - [748] - [1627]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: