Law Questions and Answers

What if I kill a human being who has adjectives my sister and was set free due to absence of evidence?

What are the chances that I will attain death-penalty?
Answers: It will require extreme faith for you to gross it through this. I have a sister whom I adore and am highly close with and I have a feeling the rage you must be aware of from this experience.

But something my mother used to tell me I respect as damn good direction is this - - Do not become (in character or behavior) approaching those whom have sensitive you, that makes you of late like them.

I believe if you focus more on therapeutic from this incredible tragic loss, and more on maintaining a close relationship near your sister (in spirit), and commit to living your life as a biddable example for others to follow- I truly believe, that the killer who have murdered your sister will suffer and learn the torment he has given you and quality the loss you are enduring.
The creature who sadly kill your sister: I'm sure your sister would agree; are not worth you dying for.

She wouldn't be happy if you get yourself into such trouble for the likes of a personality who is scum, to read out the least.

Remember that God say, vengeance is mine I will repay.

Though trust the issue into His hands, because He care for you.

And He will not be slow to fulfill His promise.
Because you are planning this in finance, I believe this is first-degree murder. It depends on the state you live in, but surrounded by a most states it is a mandatory life sentence. I believe.

Wikipedia say that new hampshire, spanking new jersey, and new york hold never put someone to death for anything. If you live surrounded by Texas the chance is deeply higher, near 405 executions since the reinstatement of the death cost in 1976.

Wikipedia also say that since the reinstatement of the death cost in 1976, nearby have be 1099 executions. So out of the many murder cases, explicitly a small percentage of people who enjoy been sentenced to departure.

After writing that and reading the other answers, I'm not sure how true that is. Wikipedia is not other accurate and I probably didn't take something into consideration.

But any way, don't assassinate this person. He will carry his eternal damnation, and you don't have to blend him. Wouldn't you rather be near your sister some day after you die, instead of joining her executioner? You might be mad satisfactory right now to whip another's life, I would be too. But the eternal consequences are not worth the crime. And life span in prison is no bearing in the park any.
And if this burning did not take your sister's time, then don't even risk the demise penalty, the prison sentence, or anything else. Treasure every moment you enjoy with her and stay as far away from that individual as you can get. It sucks like mad that he got past its sell-by date, but it doesn't have to turn you into a executioner.
I can understand you,,I know you love your sister totally much..But, think of urself..If you find her ex-husband and shoot him,,you will be death sentenced or time imprisonment for the rest of ur time..and bsyds your soul will be burned to hell..,,[and remember the 7th Commandment: Thou Shall Not Kill]..Your life will with the sole purpose be wasted if u do that,,but I know you can't simply forget what happened to ur sister bcoz she manner alot to u..But do u think,,your sister will be glowing seeing u where she is in a minute,,behind the bar of the jail??? Where she is very soon I think is surrounded by HEAVEN..and I think, she have fogiven her husband already,,coz u said that she was soo CALM and COOL..and be GOD-LIKE..If you really love ur sister,,you'll just hang about for justice and some empire who will just appear to be the witness..JUST WAIT and I'm sure God will make a contribution justice to her..

REMEMBER:

DON'T WASTE YOUR LIFE TO KILL ANOTHER PERSON..COZ I AM SURE YOUR SISTER WOULDN'T BE HAPPY IF YOU WILL BE DEATH SENTENCED OR BE PUT TO JAIL..
Prove him criminal within court
People who perform do not consideration 4 consequences. They talk smaller number do more
I am sure u r not one among them
your family lost one contestant by misdeed of of one person.
the ruling wants lone believe in evidence.
forgot yesteryear.
why you waste your natural life for never comings matter.
forgotten is not a cowardice achievement.
our life surrounded by this planet is fraction of time.
to kill aperson for murder is worse than the crime itself.the govrment or the judiciary or a soul has no right to thieve the life of another humanbeing.

How much evidence do I need contained by order to fluff up someone down (in good conscience)?

Answers: If it is a criminal charge, you inevitability evidence that would show their liabiliy beyond a reasonable doubt. If it is a civil concern, then you stipulation the majority of the evidence on your side
in criminal grip, the burden of proof is usually beyond reasonable doubt. it falls on the prosecution and later it is shifted to the defence counsel to rebut it. when the negotiator felt that guilt have been proven beyond logical doubt, the accused will be call for his defence. so unless the court declared that one is innocent, he may be guilty as hell for the acquittal system only that guilt have not been proven beyond pretty good doubt.

and then near is the qualty of evidence. which is the best evidence? direct or circumstantial? i haven't took evidence so i cannot answer this one.

Do you have any polite reasons why the U.S.(of)A. should preserve marijuana illegal?

Answers: No. The gov keep it illegal because they brand more money with it one illegal. First, through underhanded ways. Second, surrounded by my state dealers and growers remuneration an illegal substance tariff on their stuff. They walk contained by, have the weed weigh, pay the export tax, get a stamp proving contribution, and walk out next to all their weed free and clear. But the import tax mark up is extremly elevated since it is an illegal substance.

Pharmacuticals also lobby to hold on to it illegal. The official synthetic thc rx marinol has be around for 20 years. THe fda and gov and medical community KNOW it has medicinal worth and isnt that harmful recreationally. However, a one months supply of marinol at the lowest dosage is 1000+ in need insurance. If real weed be legal, pharmacuticals would loose out on that money. As a cancer forgiving, I can tell you that marinol is worse than marijuana. I dont close to synthetic things for one, but it made me paranoid and jittery. I was too elevated and that was on the lowest dosage. That could be because it is ONLY the synthetic thc at a concentrated horizontal.

All deaths associate beside marijuana involve dui or some other such thing that shouldnt be done while intoxicated no concern the source of intoxication - alcohol, otc med or legal rx. People involve to just use more responsibility.

I do have a sneaking suspicion that it should be age controlled though, just resembling cigs and alcohol.

If it were to be legalized, they would probably still hold growing illegal bc of the money item. Why pay a huge charge when you can grow it at home? The gov wouldnt make any money.

A lot of citizens will throw up the gateway drug theory. The merely gateway drug is peer pressure. Think about it. When be the last time you be pressured into doing something you didnt want to do? In hs I bet. When you feel the obligation to fit in and be cool and will try anything for those purposes. I dont give attention to many adults are going to be pressured into going to cocaine or meth or doesn`t matter what.

While marijuana is not chemically addictive, it is most certainly psychologically addictive. Once their is an addiction, yes, it will bring spoil and hurt to you and your family. But specifically true of any addiction from alcohol, cigs, gambling, even working too much. ANY addiction will raison d`¨ētre those problems. The key here is to use responsibly and not get hold of high 24/7.
I do not reckon it should be made either opening legal or criminal.

Besides it can cause GREAT HARM TO THOSE SUFFERING FROM MENTAL ILLNESS OR DEPRESSION.

Though it does apparently enjoy some healing properties for those suffering from glaucoma such as I do: but I use Pregablin; which can gross you feel equally 'spaced out', and within some cases enhance other pains ten times worse; like rheumatism.
Personally, I believe the U.S. should legalize marijuana. After adjectives, people are still smoking it, and abundant are going to abuse it of late like they do alcohol and cigarettes. If it's legalized, after it has to be regulated and the parliament will tax it similar to there's no tomorrow. The only upside to marijuana is that, unlike cigarettes, it have been shown to hold some medical benefits that cigarettes do not. I wouldn't be surprised if in the subsequent decade or so, pharmecutical companies end up creating a pill form from the plant.

Personally, I don't approve of marijuana because I can't stand the smell. But later, I also don't approve of cigarettes either.
Yes I hold. marijuana is a dangerous drug. it destroys the go of those who use it outside officially regulated purposes.

I have be at new undertaking for 3 weeks. i am supposed to get remunerated every week. the first week i had to submit alot?

of paperwork. i get it all faxed contained by ontime and should have gotten first check deposited surrounded by my account on the 2nd monday i worked. i get an email that sunday saying i needed to resend a form to obtain paid near my office coordinator signing it. they wanted it contained by by 7am their time which is eastern i live in centralized and our office doesn't unfold until 8am central. i get the form faxed in once i get to work but i guess because of the time thing they didn't money me. this week on wensday i got a phone saying that they susposedly didn't bring back the fax. wensday is 2 days past payday so i'm sol again. i sent the fax 3 times a moment ago to be sure they got it and sent an email necessarily begging for at lowest some money as bills are getting past due immediately. i have gotten no response or pay envelope. is there any legalized action i can lug?
Answers: First of all, find out from your employer why this is going on and if this is mundane. I don't think it is. If your boss can't serve you resolve this then you must budge over his head. Talk to the human resources department contained by your local office as resourcefully. If all else fail, then you should be capable of report this to your state's local employment office. Make sure you own all the paperwork that you faxed and the date when you faxed them. Also let them know who you talk to and what steps were taken to try to procure this resolved.
You can show them the fax confirmation and let them know that if you do not procure a response, you will file a complaint beside the labor board.

Talk to your HR person first.
The bureau is in another time zone, you hold to fax the paperwork, they claim they didn't get it..
Is this one of those "work at home" job I keep audible range about?
Send copies of the paperwork contained by a registered letter, and narrate them if you don't get a check, the subsequent letter will be from your attorney.

Mistaken for shoplifting within a big dept. store?

i can't sleep... the guard on Lacoste store mistaken me and mom for shoplifting yesterday, he required to open
Question Details: the big Lacoste paperbag my mom's handling beside one polo shirt inside amounting to 4,750 in phil. peso.w/ a tally on it. Mom giving him the paperbag to check but he did not check it nor open it.He saw my( see through)plastic bag(w/ popcorn, & contemporary jeans inside that i just bought at another store w/ unloading.) &demanding me and mom to open it & adjectives the people at hand were looking at us bec of an argument between mom & the guard,why he's doing this to us, it be really an embarassing experience.we just turn there to buy a polo shirt?& be kinda bit tired & mom is sick at that time and just needed to buy a gift for my brother.& freshly wearing an old clothes.unlike other customers near who really looks "rich".all i want that time is to grant them the items &plasticbag& not getting it anymore.i am a medical professional,i feel degraded so much,i can't sleep.the incident be on my mind until now.the store mngr, the boss of security asking for forgiveness,if your on my situation what will u do?
Answers: If he held you against your will you can win false imprisonment charges. Sec Guards cannot detain you on a hunch.
Also he have no right to look in your heaps.
Did he contact you in an distasteful manner? Battery charge.
Did he produce your mom to fall down and suffer a heart attack?
Hold the store owner vicariously liable for the whereabouts of the security guard and charge them beside intentional infliction of emotional distress.
If you have reciepts to prove you'd bought your items,then the store doesn't hold a leg to stand on!
If they're still trying to accuse you,give an account them to check their security camera footage,as it will show you going to the checkout and PAYING for your items.
Do not consent to them get away next to accusing you of this,especially if they take it to the police.

I know alot of store collateral get antsy around this time of year,stores are severely very busy and they own to be extra watchful,but don't permit this security guard's false accusation make you suffer.
I work contained by a Department store and you can not search someones plenty or make an assumption that someone have stolen anything unless you see them put something in the sack. And even with this they hold to walk out of the store near the mdse to even say they own shop lifted it. What you are describing is stereo typing. They see you and your Mom not looking your best and just assumed you two be thieves. I would contact the negotiator and demand an apology. If that does not draw from result..everyone has someone that are sophisticated in the corporate world over top of them.

Whether the same rule applies to Americans also contained by America and India?

"Indian American couple to loose mansion Indian Express", Delhi, 20.12.2007
New york: A day after it convicted a multi-millionaire Indian American couple of "modern hours of daylight slavery," a jury has fixed that their posh mansion should be forfeited to the government. US District Judge Arthur Spatt planned the sentencing for March 28 next year and will hold audible range to decide whether the bail of India-born Mahender Sabnani, and his Indonesian born wife Varsha Sabnani should be revoked and they be sent to a federal prison.
Answers: The directive of forfeiture in the U.S. applies to anyone, citizen or not, surrounded by the United States. Drug dealers, organized crime member and all will, can and enjoy lost everything they own that ca be tied to the money they made off of the crime. This is why so plentiful invest in foreign countries and buy/maintain properties outside the U.S. Money launder is an important segment of the criminal scene for that reason-if it was purchased near money from a legal source it is not competent to be taken. I do not know how Indian law works on that.

Should torture be used against enimies of the state?

Answers: 1) Define "enemies of the state".

Some years ago President Bush said those not for the US surrounded by the war on horror were against the US. Would that mingy that those who opposed the wars on horror and in Iraq be eligible to be treated as "enemies of the state" (and so eligible surrounded by turn for torture)?

2) It also raises the interview of how do you determine someone is an "enemy of the state" (and so is eligible for torture). Is a human being an "enemy of the state" simply if they have be tried and convicted of such in a court of imperative or can one be declared an enemy by executive fiat?

2) Is it OK to torture a cat or dog? Or suppose a dog savages a child. Would it be OK to torture it next?

If the response to both is NO, why then would it be OK to use torture on a human one, whether an enemy of the state or otherwise?
No, torturing individuals doesn't achieve the aim it is supposed too. The logic is that if tortured long enough and strong enough most nation will confess to anything to stop being tortured.

They may even pass false information just to craft the torture stop, this in turn would not put aside innocent lives or prevent future terrorist attacks.

Secondly, if your referring to world-shattering Muslims or "terrorists" one should keep surrounded by mind that if they die for their cause next they become martyrs, so they can be tortured to annihilation for their religion which is what they want. Why give them that gratification.

History is also full of examples of people who be tortured but turned out to be innocent, but that seems to be irrelevant at the present time.
Yes

Caution or not?

Hey, about 3 years ago a group of friends be in town, they did a silly piece and got stopped by the police. They get their names and address' taken by the side of the road, adjectives of the group were roughly speaking 13 and they never heared anything from the police after this, neither were their parents contacted. I'm confused to weather this counts as a guardedness or not? The police man gave them a discussion to and set them on tehir way.
Answers: Minors next to no follow up?

fuggedaboudit
No it is not a caution.

A police presage has to be formally given at a police station and documented.

If this is a UK interview...you can safely cold-shoulder the shite from the Americans.
No, it's not a caution, their name were lately taken in crust anything came up similar to a complaint about what they'd be doing, for instance,or if some damage be found where they'd be.

A formal caution happen when someone is arrested for an offence, admit it and it is decided that it is not appropriate to charge them & whip them to court. It's done by a senior officer at the police station and is recorded.

Should I sue Yahoo! Answers?

I just get an email from Yahoo! Answers that read:

"Hey, Fatman, don't hit that snooze button too many times.

Your cross-examine may expire in 48 hours."

Do you feel I can sue because Yahoo! called me stout?
Answers: But you are fat, aren't you? Why else would you hold a user name of "Fatman"?
you are an idiot

sue me
Lol.
Maybe shifting your sceen name will fix the problem.
i surmise you should know what you have wrote for your description,,your self appearance,,and your common sense!!
You'd hold a better case suing them for calling you "man"
It' single liable if it's not true, are you over weight mannish?
Lol. It's probably a computerized automatic e-mail that gets sent out and inserts whoever's user ID into that slot.

Ex: "Hey, Leona8522, don't hit that snooze button..."

I wouldn't sue them over it. You picked the ID.
No, you enjoy no grounds for a case. First, you are using the handle "Fatman" so they are probably using your nickname to personalize the e-mail.

Secondly, you signed away any rights you may hold had when you checked the box that agreed to the expressions and agreements when you opened your tale.

Lastly, Yahoo is a huge corporation that can bankrupt you short blinking if you pursued legal deed. Not too mention if they wanted to they can drag this satchel out for decades if they wanted to. But best of luck if you want to sue.
a user sent you that, VIA YA.

See the difference?

Web sites are immune form suits of the temperament you ask about because they are only just conduits for the info.

The very accomplishment of editing what goes through open them up to suits, and that is why they don't do it. near would be no email at all, in actual fact, no internet at all, if that be not so.

Rape and torture of Megan Williams...?

I am sure that by now everyone on Earth and possible Mars, have heard of the rape and torture, In West Virginia, of Megan Williams.
This is indeed a low incident in the history of West Virginia.
Many race have given their judgment of what should be done to the individuals, who are guilty of this crime.
I disagree with adjectives of you.
They should be put in prison where on earth the prisoners can punish them.
In prisons, there are every benign of low life that you can consider of and some you can't think of.
However, one type of individual will not be tolerated. This an individual who harms or rapes a child or a woman.
I read of a man who be put in prison for raping and murdering a babyish girl.
He died in prison of a ruptured bowel. It doesn't whip a genius to numeral out what happened.
Also, I am sure that if this crime have happened to a white woman, within would not have be such an out cry. The news would enjoy died down long ago.
Where was The Rev Al Sharpton when five black kids kill a white kid?
Answers: google it

More Questions and Answers:
[2536] - [1541] - [919] - [138] - [2470] - [1656] - [1161] - [1190] - [757] - [1207] - [1307] - [1805] - [783] - [1422] - [1203] - [1731] - [2407] - [1733] - [1415] - [2336]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: