Law Questions and Answers
What is the statute of limitations in Australia for property wreckage?
18 months ago a friends car be hit by by an uninsured driver, my friend didn't have insurance any, nobody was hurt but my friends saloon was totaled in a minute he is left beside a debt of 15000. Is it possible to sue this driver or has the statute of limitations run out?Answers: no way of unfolding without a scorecard.
Lapse in ins. coverage:Is it possible to NOT return with your tag taken for 30 days if this is my 1st time w/ a lapse?
I hold been w/ Nationwide Ins. for over 8yrs and never have a lapse in coverage. But just now, I had to fly to Fla. (I live surrounded by NC) b/c my grandma was sick. During this hectic time, I have wrote out my car ins. check and be going to mail it the subsequent day back my flight left but forgot. By the time I get back, I have a letter from N.W. wise saying my poicy had be cancelled. During the next couple of wks I be getting different stories from my agent about reinstating my policy w/out a lapse. However, they terminated up not being competent to do so. Therefore, after being totally fed up w/ them, I switched ins. companies. Then, concluding week I received a letter from NC DMV motto that I had to turn my strip in for 30days b/c of the lapse!? When I call the DMV about this, they said I be supposed to have rewarded a fine of $50 from the 1st letter they sent. However, I just received 1 letter but apparently it be the 2nd letter! I never know of this "law" about lapse within cov., is there any means of access to avoid losing my tag?Answers: Appeal to the DMV: but probability are they aren't going to be impressed with so tons gaps here within what happened.
All you can do is be in motion there surrounded by person (phone is a spend foolishly of time) and show them the coorespondence between you and the insurance companies, as well as the certainty you have current coverage very soon. Someone in DMV might transport pity on you and waive it... might, don't hold your breath!
They hear "I didn't get the letter" in the order of 50 times a day! They own no obligation to impart you a break, just so you know, you're surrounded by the wrong here. As soon as you said "I forgot" to mail it, you're at blame. Sorry, but it's true.
Just be nice and see if the nice lady on the other side of the counter buys the sick grandma string... :)
Hey MADD, How can I legally maintain the drunk that totaled my truck off the road?
A woman drove across a highway median and hit my truck. It be totaled and I am having ongoing subsidise problems now. She have no insurance, property, or even job. I with the sole purpose ended up beside bluebook value on my newly paid past its sell-by date vehicle and actual out of pocket medical cost due to having an uninsured motorist policy myself. I probably won't collect for 4 days missed work or misery and suffering since she is on disability / welfare.On the police report it says that she admit to the officer that she had taken 3 puffs of cocaine and it cause a panic attack. So, not singular did she fail the feild sobrity examination for alchohol, she was smoking crack while driving!!!
I would close to to prosicute her criminally in such a road as to keep her from getting final her drivers license until she pays me for my time missed at work and pain and suffering.
I hold a civil judgement, but as they say you can't draw blood from a turnip. I only just want to keep her stale the road as long as possible so no one else suffers.
Answers: i agree next to wizjp you really need to win in touch near the DA.
ask what is happening near the case.
beforehand you do that you need to take home sure that you have adjectives the police reports and take your decision papers with you.
if they utter their not prosecuting the person. later ask who the victims advocate is.
you should share the DA if they are not going to prosecute.
You want to press charges for assault if that doesn't work, take your papers to your local communication outlet.
this person could shoot some one and should not be on the street
The sad cut is unless she's in intern she probably will drive without her license as do thousands of convicted dui'ers.
j
The District Attorney, or local prosecutor, is the one who will build the decision on whether or not to prosecute and what charges to prosecute. You really enjoy no say contained by what happens. Now, as a martyr, your input is essential, and most states mandate that you be given a chance to be hear, but the DA still makes the outcome.
As for the license suspension, there is hugely little that most DA's can do with regard to that. In most states the Department of Transportation sets the rules that governs how long a license will be suspended.
Tiles ordered and paid for from turkey to a showroom within uk no longer required what are my rights?
Answers: If they are fit for the purpose and not faulty, the showroom is not underneath any obligation by canon to refund. Some retailers will but can charge a re-stocking levy. Because they're from afar, I can't see them going back.
None lm afraid if its simply a overnight case of you changing your mind - if they be damaged or broken when you take them you can claim a refund
Fingers crossed for a bumpy ride!
The merely sure way of one able to return them and self refunded your pocket money would your finding fault next to the tiles.Either they are not exactly what you ordered , they are not suitable for use or they are faulty.
Can I do something about age nouns?
I was fired from my duty. i only worked nearby for 6 months. I was working at another livelihood for 10years and I quit because this employer offered me more money doing the same item , Then she hired a new commissioner who told me I sounded to old on the phone. She kept on watching everything I did at work. and she told the owners that I be not up to her expectations. Well I do not have a opportunity now and I am looking. But presently i feel that everyone that call them for refrences will be told I did not know what I was doing. I am 61 years out-of-date and have never be fired from a job. I individual had 5 job in my lifetime because I other stayed at my job that be the first time I ever left a assignment on bad vocabulary. What can I do? Any advice!!Answers: Hi, Certainly you can, nouns is a subject that opens everyone's eyes, ring the Discrimination board or the unreasonable dismissals department / or see - ring a Solicitor (first consultation is free) and You will have your chore back " next to a written apology " if you want one" (Personally I would in skin something happens resembling this again).within a week or two at the Maximum.
Now remember if you are surrounded by the wrong it will backfire but Honestly I think you will do capably
Good Luck and do not let them meander over you
Merry Xmas
Davo
Western Australia
See an attorney about an age nouns suit under Title VII. First you'll database a complaint with the EEOC, who will investigate...and probably fix this on their own without you need to file suit.
http://eeoc.gov/charge/overview_charge_f...
If you are contained by the U.S. contact your local unemployment department. (Usually called (Your city/county) Onestop)
They usually enjoy services for "mature workers". I infer they give guidance to brief seekers (and maybe possibly incentives to employer??) I just saw something just now on my local site about it but I didn't take-home pay much attention as I'm in my 20s.
If you can't find it beside a search engine appointment 1-8OO-fedinfo and ask for the number to your local unemployment bureau.
Advice from me...I worked as a caregiver for people beside Mental Retardation for a while, its very flowing to get into these job and they prefer mature and retired those. Doesn't pay ably...maybe $8/hr...but it's something...and it's something you can get the impression good just about doing at the end of the afternoon.
**Oh yeah...and sue them! (Sorry I didn't realize this was the Law section)
Good luck!
converse to an attorney, the comment about you sounding too ripened on the phone is a red flag that this woman was discriminating base on age.
I wouldn't put that job down as a suggestion, especially if that manager is giving the reference. If you were on pious terms near someone from there, ask them if they can be your citation and use them as the contact.
Is this harassment? Serious associates only.?
My wife works within a call center. They enjoy six different "teams" with 12-15 citizens per team. My wife's troop is mainly comprised of women 30-60 for some idea and two men in their 40's. The floor boss drew a picture of a woman near saggy bare breasts and wrote "saggy bottom girls" on the whiteboard baggy on the wall in their piece. I know this is inappropriate, but can he be charged near harassment? He said that be their new "team" christen?Answers: yes he can, and a free slap from you.
The floor boss is an insensitive jerk. What if he'd written something derogatory give or take a few blacks if they were adjectives or mostly black? The same rules should apply.
Is this harassment? I don't muse so.
I do think he should be demoted, transferred and chastised.
This falls underneath the category of creating a hostile work environment, which is by definition harrasment. File a complaint with your HR department hastily, and have anyone else who saw this and be offended database a complaint as well. If you achieve no satisfaction from them (or if your identity is revealed to the offender) report a complaint with the labor board of your state.
This behavior is poor.
From the way you phrased this, I believe this man falls underneath the "Great Gallant" type of harasser. Here's the definition from Wikipedia.
Great Gallant: This mostly verbal singling out involves excessive compliments and personal comments that focus on appearance and gender, and are inappropriate or embarrassing to the receiver. Such comments are sometimes accompanied by leering looks. The "wolf whistles" of a street harasser are one example of this.
Thought improper, I doubt one can sue this man for doing this; it's much too tame to bring into court, at most minuscule as far as I know.
Unbelievable! That is completely inappropriate behavior, whether it is committed by a man or a woman. This guy must be from the night ages to dare do something like this.
At the remarkably least this should be reported so that the proper disciplinary movement can be taken. I don't know for certain if persecution charges will come from this, but regardless most companies have a nought tolerance for these acts.
There may capably be a new floor boss within the near adjectives.
No, he cannot
but it is inappropriate
EDIT**
Monte T... are you clich¨¦ the board of labour enjoy a camera phone?
yeah, he can be charged with hounding. Most businesses would want them to deal near the offender first and afterwards take their complaints through the fasten of command before it reach a legal stratum.
this probably isn't the first time he's done this and it certainly won't be the closing if they don't take endeavour.
They need to:
1. Document the incident--take a digital picture of the drawing; save a journal near the time and dates and what be said and to whom and by whom.
2. *speak up as a group* and let him know it is rude and needs to stop. Point out to him specifically why it is obnoxious. on an innocent level, He's probably such a troll that he think he's being amusing and witty and may not even realize that he is certainly hostile, misogynistic and ageist.
3. speak up each and every time he is disagreeable and harassing.
4. if he doesn't take them seriously or continues near the rude comments, then embezzle the documentation and complaints to his boss or human resources.
5. if the company culture will not deal next to the complaints, then contact a attorney about permitted reparations.
sounds like a lawsuit. that's funny; I'm going to use it ...hope I don't find sued for copyright infringement. grow a pair why don't you
Paypal have found within my favour and refund me for an item that has presently arrived. What should I do?
I bought an item for lb215.I started a dispute with ebay and the retailer finally sent me the item.
I forgot to terminate (close) the dispute and Paypal hold found in my desire. I have be refunded lb150 so far. What happen now? Can I maintain this money or will Paypal start some sort of recovery process against me? Is it newly bad luck for the vendor or can I be forced to give vertebrae the money?
I presume the seller have proof of postage. Has anybody else been surrounded by this position before?
Answers: You enjoy the item and if you are going to keep the item you necessitate to pay for the item.
distribute it back or you are going to acquire the seller excluded from ebay and that isn't fair, so do the right thing and put in the picture paypal that you have received the item.
Merry Christmas
Hmmmm if you are bright and breezy with the item presently you finally have it, adjectives decency say you ought to refuse the refund payment really.
However, if the wholesaler has be a totally evil git .. naw, send it pay for! Be a nice HONEST person - it IS christmas!
yeah have same thing, disputed something get refund and item turned up, i did the honest article though and told the seller and they sent me an invoice/money request for the amount through paypal and i rewarded them their money!!
and yes paypal can take it rear legs. they have the right to. afford it back past your disputed against.
If you are an honest person you will do one of the following:
1. Retun the item.
2. Return the money.
You are properly liable to do one of these. To do eitherwise is either fraud or thieving.
Proof of postage is NOT proof of delivery, did you sign for it?
If you did sign for it you own to send it backbone or pay up
Sounds likw your quids within mate. Some people own all the luck
don't be a push
you've got the products so return the cash
what more is here to say.
otherwise you are guilty of fraud
Keep the money and why are you recounting us this?
I once got a fridge freezer element for nothing the guy who deliver it said he did not know who it was supposed to be for and lately left it next to me. Still works.
Do you still want the item? I would log into paypal, and send them the money you own been refund back.
Your retailer won't have proof you recieved the item unless they sent it "record signed for" or "Special Delivery" or used a courier. Proof of postage is not proof of delivery. But I'm sure that's not the point.
Go to www.paypal.co.uk and click on distribute money. As a recent payee you should easily be capable of select your seller.
I know it seem tempting sometimes to drill bad seller a lesson, but lb150-lb215 seems to me to be too much of a lesson.
Do the right point and pay the money to the wholesaler. He may have have a non-performing seller strike, but i would ruminate that would be he last of his worries, when you breed the offer of paying him the money.
Get his email address and settle him via paypal that way.
Honest, mate. You've immediately got the item. Hence legitimate title will pass to you ONCE expense has be recieved by the seller and not until that time.
Send the item back or repay the change.
As other users have said, the fully clad thing is to return the money.
As far as the statute is concerned it is theft. The relevant skin is Attorney General's Reference No. 1 of 1983 [1985] 1 QB 182. In that case an hand received an extra lb74 in her settle by mistake. On discovering the mistake the employee substandard to give the money put money on. The Court of Appeal confirmed that this was an fault contrary to section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968.
I judge you are OK as the seller didn't respond to compensate pal within time or in the right road. If anything it would be up to the seller to jump after you.
What Would You Do????
Ok so a month ago i get a run within with the CAS(cps equivalent) and they obtain a complaint from a public health nurse which be unverified. So shortly after them leaving they land MY medical files illegally in need consent or a warrant of any kind. So i settle on to file a complaint near the workers supervisor for invading my doctor/patient confidentiality well the supervisor agrees that the worker be wrong and says she will donate me a written apology, i was happy with that.(that be 2 weeks ago) then yesterday she(the worker) say she has to come backbone out cause at hand were "new" allegations i am a drug user... WTF??? I own never touched a drug in my life span.I tell her i will stir for hair folicle,blood and urine trialling to prove it.
Do you think that possibly this worker invented this lie because she be angry i filed a complaint against her? She have openly obtain and spoken to my doctors just 2 weeks ago and if at hand were concerns of drug misuse she would have specified about it.
Answers: Well, you enjoy established a motive for retaliation for that CAS worker, so, yes...I'd threaten legal management. If not for harassment on their element, then for libel or slander on the bit of the party that made the allegations. By them acting on it, I believe they're simply as guilty. I'd personally stick to suing them, that approach, if they want, they can sue the other party for fraud.
And, seriously, since this isn't your 1st run-in beside CAS, don't back down. Trying to prove an expectant mother.of self an unfit mother, is stress that noone needs. Causing undue stress to a pregnant woman should be a crime within itself.
Good luck.
Sometimes certain foods we drink will result a positive drug outcome. I would hire an attorney and allow him/her on how to advise me correctly.
You might own a very lucrative lawsuit on your hand...
Normally, I'm not big on running to a lawyer, but surrounded by this case, you are self seriously harrasssed.
I'd get an attorney, but I'd still do the drug test. You're in the right here.
I would contact a attorney..There is someone that is not attachment you and reporting you saying you do drugs or doesn`t matter what. Do you have enemy's?
They enjoy to follow up on complaints that they recieve but the investigation into something is suppose to last 30 days and if nil can be proved then the defence is closed.
She could have made that up but afterwards again why would she want to make you silly anymore and then profile another complaint. Are you saying that a nurse you see at the doctor call in on you? Did anything at adjectives show up on your tests? Just person around someone smoking pot can get into your system -i know those that have tested positive for THC and they don't even smoke it but bring they were around it -it be in their system.
I would sue the hospital/doctor's organization over my medical records if i be you
Can a 15 year old child REFUSE to be in motion with non custodial parent on court ordered weekends?
Can the non custodial parent 'force' the minor child to departing with them? Can and will the police department serve? There is a lot more to this, but the non custodial parent does own a COURT ORDERED visitation guide, and has NEVER done anything to spoil, (in any fashion) this child. How can the visitation be enforced against the CHILD?Answers: The child has the right to disallow to go, but if in that is contention between the parents, then the non custodial parent will see the child refuse to go as the child have been influenced by the custodial parent--not because of anything the child in actuality wants.
The non-custodial parent will enjoy the right to call the police within to have the child forcibly removed from the custodial home, but if the child is competent to convince the police that he has a lawful reason for not wanting to travel with the parent, next they may not force the child to go.
But previously things get that far, the child is old-fashioned enough to sit down near the non-custodial parent and explain why he doesn't want to visit at this time. The child is at an age when his social natural life picks up (I'm going to assume that this is why the child doesn't want to visit) and he and his parent need to negotiate between themselves how they are going to touch their time together. It needs to be made clear to the child, that since his time beside his non-custodial parent is limited and his parent desires to spend time with him, that he desires to make an go to call during the week-just to converse (5-10 minutes of idle chit chat) and to arrange his social calendar around his visitation times or when he can't, to negotiate an alternative visitation time next to his parent.
If the reason the child doesn't want to call on doesn't have anything to do beside his social life, after a better effort by the parent wishes to be made to find out why the child doesn't want to go. Is in that someone else at the non-custodial parent's home who is making life difficult for the child? Is the custodial parent truism things, not specifically to the child but around the child that causes the child to quality like he have to choose between his parents?
If the child isn't forthcoming about why he doesn't want to shift and the custodial parent is not helping to figure out what the issues are, after this is when you need to jump back to court on the custody issue and own social services get involved to interview the child to see what the definite issue is. Please note that this is a drastic and serious turn which would indicate near are some serious issuses going on.
I hope you figure out what is going on.
Good Luck.
idk i know at thirteen they can choose who they live near
and my dad had a court decree for visitation rights and at about 15 i stopped going to see him
he didnt name the police tho
No the child can not be forced by the non custodial parent but the custodial parent can be found in contempt of court for failing to surrender the child for visitation.
If you telephone call the police, they will follow the divorce decree visitation diary.
Had the same issue.
You must modify your motion..So more court, more lawyers, and more money down the drain.
If the non custodial parent make a stink over the kid not wanting to visit next simply go subsidise to court and have the custody agreement modified. The kid is antediluvian enough that the court will listen to the child's wishes and MOST imagined side with the kid.
By 15 yrs alot of kids are so consumed beside hanging next to their friends that their parents become like a situation noise. Its quantity of them spreading their wings but it can still hurt to survey them do it.
The kid should be encouraged to state some contact with the noncustodial parent. It doesn't nouns like the home dynamics involved the non custodial parent as being offensive so the kid should show RESPECT to the parent that did help create it by keeping within contact with the parent. (Christmas and birthday card and copies of the report cards and a college photo each year would be a wearing clothes offering).
Family is family and the kid should be skilled to understand that.
In Texas the police can not force a 15 year behind the times to go. I also, as a 17 year veteran officer would not allow the child to be forced, physically, by any parent to go. I enjoy had dozens of consultations next to different assistant district attorneys about this. You should hold audio and video of the confrontation to defend against a contempt of court audible range if you are the custodial parent. I do not think a intercede would find contempt though. I would attempt counseling as a family, next to both parents. If there is no history of trouble the custodial parent should do everything possible to stir up the child to go. Remember that law vary state to state, but I doubt any state would allow a child that frail to be dragged kicking and screaming against their will.
Police farce?
Do you feel that British police are incompetent to fight crime because the parliament sidelines their duties to obtain as much revenue from drivers as possible, or, are they in recent times lacking like sense of justice and protection as the ancient fashion conquer bobbys.Even when I was a kid surrounded by the 70's, the local bobby would be well set in the community and would respected for the process he knew what be going on and we knew that he be boss, not for standing in the road pointing a speed gun when antiquated ladies a being robbed.
Answers: The policy have a massive enunciate in what we do. After adjectives they fund us and dictate what we have to do.
The current state of play manner we complete more paperwork than ever before. They will enjoy you believe there is smaller quantity, but that is plainly not the case. They will also state that near are more officers than ever formerly. Where are they then?
Even as a firearms officer I have a feeling the brunt of what the government want...target, targets, and more target. That means when I'm not dealing near firearms incidents I have to issue tickets, tickets and more tickets. To some scope my discretion has be taken away.
What I'd like to see the management do is get rid of NCRS (National Crime Recording Standards) which will effectively be determined that officers no longer hold to spend hours on cases where culture do not want to complain. An example of this would be a report of say two brother warfare. when you turn up its obvious they hold fought, as one has minor injuries. Neither want to complain and state they enjoy kissed and made up. Under the old system it would be a hurried pocket notebook entry and Bobs your auntie, thats the end of the event. Today the officer has to crime an assault, hold statements, interview the offender and submit a report asking that the crime is in a minute detected. All this takes time and technique that the officer(s) spend less time on patrol and smaller amount time helping people who really involve us. All this so the government can enjoy some more crime figures!!
They also requirement to scrap the Human Rights Act, deport immigrant offender (by that I mean those that are convicted of crimes that kind our society worse, i.e drugs, guns, violence etc), and roughly overhaul the criminal justice system so that punishments in reality reflect the crimes. Give victims adjectives the rights and limit those of the guilty party.
I could go on and on, but rant over!!!
I agree near you to a point there that an interpretation of the police could be made along the dash you address
,But we, have to be faithful in the approach to the duty a policemen have,
Every time he/she attends for duty they are given that duty by a senior, and they, in turn are also below instruction it sounds like you, and I grew up when the Bobby be a figure of complete authority.
Sadly, them days are long gone, near a certain component of our society, (Not All) Policing is a thank less work and not one I, could do ,Honestly, could you,?
its not just the police who should be aggression crime its all of us.
posterior in the 70's the police would not hold come across housing estates that where anyone run by drug dealers near every one turning a blind eye. i know of a incident where a outdated man was assaulted by a 18 year elderly lad, at a shopping prescient with roughly 25 people adjectives looking on.
the old man died 3 week next.
most of the 25 people that witnessed the incident have known this lad adjectives his life all the same not one would help the police to convict him.
things enjoy changed since the 70's and not always for the better more drugs and so on so please don't simply make out its down to the police
I be a kid in the 70's/80's and I honestly do not bring to mind what ppl are constantly on about adage there be always Bobbies on the pace. I rarely saw any to the best of my recollection.
You will find that most officer who are frontline "Response" have little time and smaller number inclination to issue tickets for seatbelts etc. In the last 5 years I hold issued approximately 4 or 5 and these were to specified criminals. With a caseload of enquiries to follow up on and ppl to arrest there are more pressing matter and if it is a "generally ruling abiding" person they will almost other recieve words of advice. The one and only traffic I deal next to are drunk drivers/disqualified drivers and those who checks reveal are uninsured or have no licence.
There are departments devoted to Road Safety and it is because of high publicity that everybody think all police concord with is poor canon abiding motorists. If you have have a ticket you have broken the decree. I have 1 speeding sanction in 18 years of driving. If I'm honest I should hold had like mad more and so would the vast majority of road users.
That said nearby is far too much paperwork which is probably part of the use I dont issue tickets
I think here are a lot of reason why perception of the Police has changed but mostly it's reduced powers, too much paperwork, appalling pay and no rights to strike, a few discouraging apples giving the whole service a bleak name, medium misrepresentation and public misconception, to name a few.
I've without question that if your local beat bobby could still make available little wotsits a good clip around the ear, and later cart them home by the scruff of their neck to parents that would then discipline them, near would be fewer ASBOs issued.
The Government, by making the undertaking paperwork and target driven, and by introducing PCSOs and Highways Officers instead of beat bobbies and traffic officer, has little by little eroded any motivation and respect within and for the service. Add to that apalling settle up, reneging on pathetic "retribution rises" (can you imagine other professions even settling for the promised 2.5% short picketing, let alone the certainty that it's actually solely 1.9%), and it's a wonder we still have a Police Service at adjectives.
One final point about speed cameras and vans; the Government get the revenue directly to the Treasury, so there's no incentive for Police to catch speeding drivers as a monetary exercise. If you look closely at speed camera vans immediately you will find that at least partly of them are manned and provided by your local council and not by the Police at adjectives.
And for all those populace who think that speeding or traffic offence are not a crime in equal way as an ancient lady person robbed, I would ask this - if your husband/wife/child was run over and kill by a speeding driver, wouldn't you consider that a crime and want justice? I would. Phew! Long answer. Merry Christmas!
The Government speak near forked tongue.
They need you to swallow the nouns bite of ''We are the Party for Law and Order''.
On the other hand they cannot enjoy an effective Police Force arresting and imprisoning.
The Prisons are already overcrowded and underfunded.
Also, as you utter, they cannot have an unexploited and demoralised Police; therefore the Government pump the Road Safety ticket for the Police to enforce.
What nobody realises is that the serious repeat insecure drivers have no licence, tariff or insurance and have no registration attachment to the sports car they are using.
The upshot is that the normally protected driver is being capture on camera a few miles an hour over.
Of course there is the truth of the change milking, I do not think that even a highly stupid Politician would deny that.
Sorry; British Politicians would deny the colour of sh1t if they thought they could get away near it.
More Questions and Answers:
[1611] - [1627] - [2504] - [1153] - [1033] - [1703] - [1965] - [1261] - [1392] - [1561] - [1395] - [1238] - [1139] - [662] - [2525] - [2515] - [935] - [578] - [1071] - [1901]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: