Law Questions and Answers

Who can put you in a mental hospital?

Can Cop legally recognized take some to a mental haosible who did not commite a crime?
How do citizens get put contained by a mental hosible and how long do they stay and what the best way to go and get out.
Answers: If a law enforcement officer have reasonable grounds to believe that you might spoil yourself or others as a result of a possible mental condition, you can be placed under a mandatory 72 hour (3 day) hold within a mental hospital for evaluation. the hospital would then determine whether you would enjoy to stay and how long.
Yes, law enforcement officer who have probable grounds to suspect a citizen of being a threat to himself or others can involuntarily place the citizen contained by a facility for a maximum of 72 hours. After that, it becomes a licensed medical or court's ruling as to whether or not a citizen is to be released or is to remain within the facility.

More recurrently than not, law enforcement officer are called upon situations where on earth the citizen did in certainty commit a crime, and based on witness reports, etc. make a determination as to whether or not the citizen is suspected to be in bleak mental health.
Great interrogate! Just about anyone can own you committed to a mental institution. The laws are thinned and poorly drafted
when it comes to this particular issue! Not the free country
you reckon it is!
Parents, legal guardians, a settle, and a medical doctor.

Each state has a directive dealing with involuntary commitments. Typically you are entitled to a audible range in Court in 10-30 days of being committed. No police officer by himself can commit you to a mental hospital, although they no problem can call an ambulance or suggest to medical personal that they guess someone needs services.

If someone is within the hospital against their will I would recommend consulting with an attorney, but hang on to in mind you are probably going to payment $2,000-5,000 for these type of legal services.
Being placed into a mental hospital is a civil exploit, not criminal, so you don't have to commit a crime to be placed within one. In most states police officers enjoy a right to take you into custody and enjoy you evaluated. The time you stay and how you get out vary by state. To be honest, the cop probably did you a favor by not locking you up.

When was the end time that you saw a copper doing what he is paid to do? (i.e.,..protecting the public!).?

...The singular time we see those skivers, in our town, is when they push to the front of the queue surrounded by the local take-a-way for a "freebee"! You try to get them to turn out when a crime is person commited and the lazy bas*tards wont even answer the phone! And they moan around not getting a rise!...I wouldn,t pay them surrounded by broken biscuits!
Answers: Today actually. Thanks for the two points.

I do not know almost you, but living in the UK, I am glad to enjoy a first rate police force protecting me and my family. (A pity the home secretary does not realise that.) I run it from your question that you are inopportune to live in a country where on earth unlike in the UK, the police are involved contained by supressing the people, similar to in Burma or Zimbabwae. If you are from the UK, be in motion and live there to appreciate our boys surrounded by blue.
boo hoo dry your eyes!!
they put their lives on the line everyday for ungrateful pigs close to you!!!
I dont think I ever see a cop doing their job
I see them doing what they are salaried to do everyday that I sho up for my shift at the police department. If you think cops are idle whiners why don't you go and do a ride a long and see what its approaching to be an officer.

If you're not that open minded shut your f'n pie hole and step rant someplace else
Today actually.. I be involved in a pursuit and a foot chase which lead to the arrest of a disqualified driver. Maybe you should get out and try some excercise.. or even work!!!!!

To adjectives those that don't know STAND2... he is bitter because he wanted to go in the police but was not permitted!!!!
Right! We have speed vans who help yourself to pictures of speeders and red light cameras who do adjectives of the work, Checking the mail is resembling Christmas every day you purely dont ever know if you are gunna get a ticket

Should prostitution be decriminalised?

It's the oldest profession. Making it illegal newly sweeps it under the runner and encourages sex slavery doesn't it?
Answers: Absolutely should be decriminalized. Those of you who don't agree, Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics! (Or freshly visit the COYOTE trellis site. Search for it. You're smart enough to find it...)

Nevada legalize brothels and prostitution. Holland does so too. Other countries are equally enlightened. Here's the factors I see.

1. If you normalize it, you get to set standards of cleanliness and safekeeping. Like the workers must be free of communicable diseases and must undergo regular examinations to verify that condition. You would also be capable of force better documentation of the workers.

2. The workers (now in a legally recognized "service" industry) can get hospitalization and other benefits, including credit on paying into social shelter. Further, if they can get medical benefits, they can any get the employer to income for the regular exams for diseases and such - or they can take the cost out of their taxes.

3. The "independent contractors" who totter the streets eventually get forced to lift their business where everyone else does their business. This would exterminate some of the violence (done BOTH ways) to those independents.

4. The management could chalk up another source of income from the occupational license and "sales tax" receipts.

5. We could free up greatly of the vice cops to other duties.

6. This would actually REDUCE or END sexual slavery as a process to keep a stable of "workers" - because of the notion of inspections by law enforcement. Not single that. If the profession becomes trial, the workers don't need to stow for fear of prosecution for anyone a prostitute. There would be no legal cost for that admission any more.

Not to mention that other types of profession suddenly become possible. For example, a tremendously different form of sex therapist. A instrument to TEACH young boys how to please their partner. (Dad's little talk something like "the birds and the bees" is usually sadly not up to scratch at anything related to technique.)

Legalizing prostitution does not mean "a brothel on every corner." You can't enjoy businesses in residential neighborhoods in a minute. That surely wouldn't change. You can contend brothels to be restricted to certain zoning areas that can't go off too close to schools and playgrounds. That wouldn't be too big an issue, any.

The only origin this can't be legalized now is because too lots people don't want to acknowledge that neither Nevada nor Holland own been subjected to Biblical curses such as hailstones falling from the sky to burn like lumps of coal, or a plague of frogs, or stuff close to that.
Well they certainly aren't going to run to stamp it out...as you say, it's the oldest profession.
Personally I would be in motion for legalising it then at lowest possible there can be some control...i.e regular vigour checks and ensuring that the prostitutes can work within relative 'safety'.
No, I disagree. People who participate contained by sex slavery or in the sex trade wouldn't call round legal prostitues even if they could. I be determined, if they just needed sex they would pay a prostitute past its sell-by date the street. Or they would go to a place where on earth prostitution is legal, close to some cities in Nevada.

To answer the first member of your question, I don't muse prostitution should be legalized everywhere. There is no way to monitor the leisure, the income, the safety of the workers, etc. And since (unfortunately) prostitution is repeatedly linked to std's and drug use, these things would be an even larger problem. Not other, but often.
surely its already tax, pimps taking a large cut, and not paying costs when they hurt the girl, if it be legalised at least the girls would hold the law trailing them, its the same beside dodgy cabs a scum hackney cab driver gets mugged, tough. licenced hackney carriage gets mugged he get help, due respect.
iv'e see the scum near the girls, true cabbies see it all and we honestly, do try to back.
yes. every street corner should have one.
Yes it should.

I similar to to use "Life Liberty or Property" as a measuring stick as to what should and should not be legitimate.

How does prostitution deny anyone life free will or property?

It doesn't hurt anyone or infringe on their rights.

The government should not legislate morality.
Yes. All of us who work deal in our body for money so lets not kid ourselves we are any better than anyone else.

If work contained by the sex industry was decriminalised and regulated,
1. it might remove the criminal gang who traffic in women,
2. the men and women who choose to provide sex could be safer contained by their chosen profession,
3. the clients could be safer, knowing the service providers are subject to regular medical checks,
4. the government would gain levy income.
This is another flagrant example of governments kowtowing to mostly religious pressure groups, and /or criminal organization, sticking their combined heads contained by the sand, and pretending that there is no problem. It's palpable that what people want cannot be repressed.

Realistic citizens understand that prostitution, approaching dope, cannot be legislated away, and everyone concerned would be better off if we followed other jurisdiction's example where on earth prostitution is legalized.

Instead of wasting taxpayers money on useless repression, as well as creating dodgy and unhealthy working conditions for society working in the sex trade, government should legislate, introducing enlightened laws.

Amongst other things:
Prostitution should be identified as a legitimate profession.
Prostitutes should be licensed.
Prostitutes should be required to submit to regular vigour exams and be issued health certificate
Prostitutes should be given the opportunity to work in established sex hotels.
Prostitution should be celebrated as a public health service.

However, as long as prostitutes and their clients are marginalized, and nation tolerate the existing situation unfortunately nought will change because politicians act in response to pressure.

Mainly due to lack of political will at hand is little or no hope to change this towards the back, unenlightened, sad and stupid ultraconservative state of affairs.
What along near rape, murder, robbery, theft, assault ,homosexuality, lesbianism, buggery, making bombs,
make off with, where do you start and stop, if its legalized to sell sex on the street or home whats wrong next to selling puff skunk dope heroin coke or crack. The line have to be draw-en in the sand.
The forces that be will never stamp out crime,, they will always be second best, but if you start taking what little laws(weapons ) away from them,it might be your corner that the girls stand on, and your kids may hold run the gauntlet of drug dealers and junkies that are attracted by this Nobel art of prostitution, I hold included unnatural acts as slice of my example because I feel that these are examples of regulation changes that own benefited the minority to the cost of the majority and my personal feeling is that it be a change brought threw the pay for door by a load of Lordy poofters and their hens, pressured by their blackmailing boyfriends standard lamp the touch paper and stand hindmost
NO! man, that means ma role as da pimp is gonna be phased out by da Government target, and jus tink of da paperwork we'd all enjoy ta fill out. Da pro's will be so tied up padding in da unneccesary paperwork and tryin to do their thang wit surrounded by Government guidlines that the ho's won't be able to do da living man, ya feel me.

And don't carry me started on tha clients fillin in da Disclaimers as ably as tha Health & Safety Regs me gurls will have to abide by.

There be too much money at stake to be givin it to da crooks contained by New Labour.
fotofarie, MP's won't tax it because they'll own to pay more !!

Should be official and regulated. It will always exist so why not variety it with smaller number dangers.

Im a former Postal employee. My PM didnt submit my travel reimbursement forms. Whats my best course of act?

I am supposedly entitled to almost $500.00 which I have not received. Whenever I christen the hotlines, I get rerouted and bs'ed and hung up on. I desperately have need of this money, so where can I be in motion from here?
Answers: try this
http://www.nalc.org/depart/cau/pdf/manua...
good luck getting your money...

The coalition can ***** on your behalf and of course your onl PM will read out they lost your paper (you know similar to when he lost your sick note and request for anual for your sisters wedding) Anyway. I hope you kept copies, you'll want it. they can do a pay adjustment..

if you don't acquire anywhere, try calling the paper or word and let them surrounded by on EVERYTHING. THE P.O. has gotten away beside way too much for far to long.

) What kind of protection can a producer land for the title of a motion picture, if any?

Answers: None.

Titles are, by law, uncopyrightable.

There are numerous instances of two or more movies near the same title, and nearby are many, frequent cases of book titles where within are multiple books with alike title.

Richard
a limited trademark is adjectives.

About driving?

18. After being convicted of DUI, you will be referred to VASAP for license renewal.

A. True
B. False
Answers: False.
http://www.vasap.state.va.us/programs/in...

Is buying brass knuckles/plastic knuckles/etc.. off the internet..?

dishonest? or is just if they find it contained by possession of you?
Answers: Buying, no. In possession of, yes.
It depends what state you are in and how they are classified. In Maryland they are classified as perilous weapons.

The individual thing they can do is return with you in trouble so why bother next to them?

What are the most important components of an oral argument surrounded by a debate or a courtroom?

Answers: There is only one - the gift to persuade. Everything else is minor to that
It's not a question of components. It's a event of being persuasive, and using those elements that will be persuasive. You also hold to have the theatrical gift and mental agility to be persuasive. Not everyone have these gifts, although they can be learned to some extent. You are selling your position contained by the debate or for your client, and you can't use money. You must use facts, the law, the equity (the "rightness") of your position and your belief within your position.

What is section 1 of the public direct act?

Answers: Hi Kaz and Chris

Probably only just being British, the establishment will bring back you for anything these days.
Ray. West York's. U.K.
Section 1 - Riot

(1) Where 12 or more people who are present together use or threaten unlawful violence for a adjectives purpose and the conduct of them (taken together) is such as would cause a individual of reasonable firmness present at the scene to agitation for his personal safety, respectively of the persons using unlawful belligerence for the common purpose is guilty of riot.

(2) It is inappropriate whether or not the 12 or more use or threaten unlawful violence simultaneously.

(3) The adjectives purpose may be inferred from conduct.

(4) No person of okay firmness need in truth be, or be likely to be, present at the scene.

(5) Riot may be committed within private as well as contained by public places.

(6) A person guilty of riot is liable on conviction on indictment to confinement for a term not exceeding 10 years or a fine, or both.
I predict a riot!

I hired a roofer and he splashed paint on my neighbor's car. Am I responsible for damages?

I give my neighbor all the contact information for the roofer, but he (my neighbor) insists that I'm responsible for paying for the detail he have performed on his saloon. I believe that since the roofer got the paint on his sports car (and later removed it), that any spare repair should be performed by the roofer, not by me.
Answers: The roofer is responsible. That's why you should other hire someone who is bonded, and insured.
well if you didn't check to get sure the roofer was bonded and insured, next if he is not, you will be liable.

Its unlikely that the roofer is NOT insured.

However, if worse come to worse, your homeowner's insurance should cover you. You should contact the roofer immediately!!!!
The roofer is your agent as you be the one who hired him and are responsible for his actions. You are responsible for the damages directly and own to pay the neighbour. You enjoy to try to get reimbursement from your roofer if you can.
Those of you who mull over I am wrong will find in time I am not. This is how the ruling works. Believe it or not. You are responsible for the actions of those you hire. Marking beside a thumbs down does not change that reality.
If your painter is not insured, then your insurance will own to take perfectionism of it.
Tell your neighbor that he will have to record with the painter, your not responsible, the painter is. End of conversation.
This sounds close to a clear cut case of the roofing company individual at fault. The company's insurance company should investigate and pay packet for any damages. However, if the roofing company has no insurance and the guy skates on you, your home ownwers policy should come to your defense.
Generally the contractor is liable. Tell your negbor to put his claim within writing & submit it to your roofing contractor or his liability insurer. You MAY have your own coverage thru your homeowner's policy. You can submit a copy of the claim to them.

It is up to YOU to trade name sure the contractor has liability insurance when you hire him; otherwise you may okay find that prying money out of a contractor can be as easy as prying teeth out of an alligator.
Your neighbors vehicle was splashed by someone working for you, so you are responsible to your neighbor for the damages.

If the roofer be working for you as a contractor, he is responsible to you. So you pay the neighbor, and the roofer pays you. If he's a licensed contractor afterwards he's required to have liability insurance to cover stuff resembling this, and normally adjectives you have to do is slip away the neighbors claim on to the insurance carrier, and they do business with it. If he's not licensed, you may enjoy just have an expensive lesson in why not to use unlicensed contractors.

If the roofer be working for you as an employee, though, afterwards he is NOT responsible to you. Employees are not liable to their employers for not deliberate damage they motive in the margin of their employment.

Richard
I agree with you, the roofer be responsible, and the roofer also, I'm sure, has insurance to cover that type of entry. Plus, what damages are left if the roofer fixed the destruction? What additional repairs inevitability to be done? If paint damaged it, and the paint be removed, as long as the removal didn't cause any second damage, afterwards your neigbor doesn't have a travel case.

If I were you, I'd bring up to date your neighbor to go ahead and sue me for it -- it'll acquire laughed out of court.

More Questions and Answers:
[1912] - [1908] - [1287] - [1732] - [1208] - [2390] - [1710] - [2484] - [2472] - [2433] - [2490] - [1239] - [2446] - [1078] - [1841] - [339] - [1127] - [2563] - [84] - [565]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: