Law Questions and Answers

I need to formulate a title for copyright and music/internet download but i cant suggest of one. PLZ HELP!!!?

its for entertainment law and i inevitability to write 4,500 words. i like the conception of the internet copyright infringment but i cant find an question or adequate information.
Answers: Do a search of ruling review articles in Lexis/Nexis or Westlaw - whichever your academy gives you a password for. You'll procure some ideas on catchy titles, and be capable of work from there.
You can't find information on copyright violation? Where did yo ulook, the Dr. Seuss library?

Try googling and if you don't find 10 million articles in smaller amount then a minute, I will chomp through my hat.

Where can I find documented evidence of this:?

http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/?qi...
Answers: You won't.

"Face book" is just a slang residence for the book of mugshots.

I don't even know what the 'official' name for it is.

Normally you might find something by googling it, but googling "obverse book" hits hundreds of thousands of pages referencing the social trellis site, so your wanted facts is probably buried in in that somewhere.

The answer was right, though.

Richard
you might not find written documentation on this.

This is what is particular as "professional lingo" or "trade slang", that is , vocabulary that are peculiar to or used by people within a particular trade or profession.

you may enjoy to contact some law enforcement officer to verify that this is what they call the mug shot book.

About driving?

18. After being convicted of DUI, you will be referred to VASAP for license renewal.

A. True
B. False
Answers: False.
http://www.vasap.state.va.us/programs/in...
Oops! Drinking and driving underage? Whatever VASAP is (my gues it's a driving course or one designed to school those convicted of some driving crime (like DUI) why they shouldn't drink and drive.
Check with you DMV (Dept. of Motor Vehicles).
B No
You'll lose your license for 10 years, retribution a $1,000 fine, insurance surcharges of $1,500 a year for three years, mandatory IDRC of 12 to 48 hours with related fees (or up to 90 days of community service), and a possible penal complex stay of 180 days.

The IDRC

Whats the difference in a court baggage being dismissed or withdrawn?

Answers: A luggage is dismissed when the judge throws it out.

It's withdrawn when the delegation that brought it chooses to withdraw it.

Richard

Limits on statutory rape with no DNA but a child come out of this?

Answers: Um, I hate to break it to you, but the kid is DNA. He or she is pretty much living proof of you breaking the statute. But the time limit to prosecute someone for it depends on the state that the crime took place surrounded by.
?

Are you asking what happens surrounded by a statutory rape if there is no DNA to trial but a child is conceived during the act?

If mother know who the father is then a paternity oral exam can be done and either the soul the mother claims is the father is excluded as a possible father or he is not. If he is not excluded then conceivably, that individual could be charged with statutory rape and convicted if a jury finds beyond a fair doubt that the person who fathered the child statutorily raped the mother of the child.
some states own such limits, but even if you don't bring back the guy on rape charges, he should certainly be paying child support and for this you hold his DNA and yours in the child.

Is it true that social workers are part of the STATE LAW?

After I turned 18 & get out of foster care, I be looking into filing a lawsuit for the social worker encouraging my foster mom to NOT afford me my trust fund money from my biological dad. It was $5,500, & my former foster mom said, "You can't sue the socia worker! She IS the tenet! How are you gonna sue her?" I needed to sue the social worker & the foster mom. Also, I had roughly speaking $4,000 in Social Security rear legs pay, & she took that, too. I wasn't competent to sue because I didn't have satisfactory money, & I had no proof. How can someone prove embezzlement? I showed them my award letters & they said that's not proof ample. Also, they were unbelievably forceful upon me & the social worker MANDATED that I let my foster mom put her heading as the head of my mound account, & she said that if I didn't do it, consequently I wasn't gonna get my checks. Then, I found out adjectives my money was GONE. Her given name wasn't on either of my checks but they be on the bank details. I was 18 & antediluvian enough to enjoy my OWN acct. I'm 24 now. I didn't know
Answers: THAT social worker did not trouble to understand her mission description. I am a social worker and I help the kids on my caseload flood out applications for college, financial aid, apartments, Victim Witness Funds, Social Security and whatever else they requirement assistance with.

In California, the Social Worker spends the money on APPROVED items that YOU can help yourself to with you when you start out the foster home and believe me, those items have to be APPROVED and verified monthly that they are still surrounded by YOUR posession.

There is a checks and balance system near MANY signatures before ANY funds are approved and receipts hold to be presented with a picture if the item.hopefully your foster home beside YOU standing next to it.

File a complaint beside your District Attorney. The statute if limitations may not have done.
there not piece of the law.
Go and see your LOCAL attorney and ask for help.
If i be you get a restraining establish against ur STEP MUM.
sounds like you've be ripped off by the extremely people and agencies who are supposed to be acting within your best interests. sadly, social services regularly contracts with foster parents who are smaller quantity than caring and ethical.

How can you enjoy no proof? there's always documentation of settle up, social security payments, etc, even if you enjoy to do a lot of legwork to bring back it together. this should teach you to hold good financial documentation in adjectives and starting now.

meantime, the best you can do is find an attorney who's predisposed to take your overnight case on a contingency basis -- target they don't get remunerated unless you win the case. deplorably, they take a big chunk of the settlement and you're not conversation about huge amounts (though it may give the impression of being like it now).

my best direction: forget about it and carry on with study to take exactness of yourself and being self-sufficient. dutiful luck.
You can absolutely sue them, you freshly need to agree on if that's the best route to get your problem solved. An attorney could subpoena collection related to your case to identify any instances or pattern of mishandling of your funds. Medicaid requires strict accountability for the handling of any money that you were to own received, so that information should be readily available to a advocate acting on your behalf. Where do you find one? Look in the city command section of your local phone book and look for trial aid services. You should be able to find a low cost or free attorney to assess the strengths of your casing. Social workers have predetermined power of attorney to act as "guardian" on your behalf surrounded by legal and financial matter until you're old adequate to do so on your own. That's likely how your funds wound up missing. Now, they could be gone as part of the pack of costs of maintaining your upkeep while you be in the foster program, so be prepared for that possibility. But if that's the grip, there should be a clear broadsheet trail of documentation that supports the fact that this is what happen...and they must account for every single cent. (In the state I live within, I think trust fund money is exempt from individual messed with by anyone.)
Good luck to you.

Pay or not?

My husband was a subcontractor on a assignment for a homebuilder. When he finished his job, the builder compensated him. At that time, the builder said he wasn't going to finish the job. The homeowner call my husband and wanted to know if he know why the builder had walk away. They asked my husband if he had be paid by the builder, he told him he have. The homeowner said that they were sending a check to my husband for the amount that they owed the builder. My husband call the builder and told him the check was surrounded by the mail. The builder told him to hold it that he didn't want their money. A few days later a check arrived. My husband call the builder again and told him he had the money and he told him again to save it. Now, a month later, the builder is calling my husband relating him he wants that money backbone. Legally speaking, does he have to bestow it to him?
Answers: Yes, the money shouldn't have be sent to him but now he desires to pass it to the rightful owner.
Whose entitle was the check surrounded by? Did your husband forge a signature or anything else like that? If so, he should return the money immmediately or risk an arrest (not necessarily a conviction, but the arrest is desperate enough).

Otherwise, I don't think your husband have a duty to return the money, and I would certainly be prepared to defend my position contained by Court. Your husband put up with the call from the customer, and was thus compensated by the builder. If the builder insists on pursuing the situation in a civil court you can other settle if appropriate (somehow split the money).
Probably not. He had no contract beside either event. He might end up contained by small claims court though, esp. if the client said the check was to be given to the builder. Even consequently maybe not.

Talk to an attorney. One hour's time should obtain you what you need to know.

Does an Athiest still have to help yourself to an oath?

Answers: Yes, whether you call it an oath or an affirmation, they still enjoy to swear to tell the truth. Our courts do not use a Bible and do not swear to narrate the truth "so help me God." Our bench say: "Do you swear the nouns you are about to bestow is true, under cost of perjury."
In court, you mean?

No, they brand name an affirmation. So do members of a few Christian sect that have a religious objection to oath for secular matters.

Richard
Yes but it is not to God .

I have two childern that be born in america. A few years then we divorced and were granted dual custody.?

She married a guy from England and moved in attendance with my 2 children (with courts permission). Can she take home them have dual citizenship short my permission and if she does acquire them cual citizenship without my sanction what laws enjoy been violated?
Answers: None and yes she can you hold to take her spinal column to court to do anything but remember they may just grant her custody ,
If she has the majority % of custody no law have be violated.

Is the world Too Politically Correct these days??

Is it me or have the world gone P.C mad??! I penny-pinching i have of late read that the government are planning to produce stricter laws for using a mobile phone whilst driving. I am adjectives for road safety but do we seriously entail to threaten jail language on someone who alters their stereo or has a *** whilst driving? I construe that some degree of concentration is taken from the road when doing these tasks, but so is discussion to your wife, or baby surrounded by the car form behind you. But should that be made banned too? Or is it a yet another grip of the world's P.C Madness?!? I suffer with Asthma and sometimes requirement to take my full concentration from the road within order to bear my inhaler, Is that illegal too??

Come on family tell me what you believe!
Answers: Another term for "Political Correctness" is

"Lack of Common Sense"
Yes yes yes yes yes.


How various times have I answered this examine?

(but I'm not sure I agree with your example, largely facts say it adjectives when it comes to road safety)
have a WHAT whilst driving ? ! ! ?

yeh, course so oh so mucho pc in this day and age. . .
if you saw some of the tw@s driving up and down the road i live on, with two school and old peoples residences,you would soon realise that we necessitate laws to procure these stupid ruthless idiots that use phones etc off the road for right .. drive proplerly or your out of a licence .. about bloody time,, draw from th trash off the roads !!

if your ashma is so doomed to failure .. no you should not drive .. you could casue death to other associates..
I don't know about the world but the Uk unambiguously has..

In Scotland yesterday a 12 year outmoded who had be in strictness and sexually active since the age of 9 demanded to hold her contraceptive implant removed because she considered necessary to get pregnant..


Social workers agreed to it

thats unquestionably ridiculous but true

check it out in the each day record if you don't believe me

EDIT:

ryankneale

we can't even do that contained by Scotland now
I agree that it's lately getting over the top, but sometimes that particular canon is appropriate, I just don't conjecture they should be too strict about it. I imagine that, when you can, you should find somewhere safe to park to answer your phone or anything, but sometimes you just can't, and it shouldn't be taken as a serious problem.

But, approaching you said, is it not the same article as talking to relatives in the vehicle? That is definately true, that's why it's difficult to answer this questions. Let's purely be glad they don't have a statute that we can't do that either.
Ever hear of Driving Without Due Care and Attention? Or Dangerous Driving?

And I'm not sure that jailing ancestors that use a phone whilst driving is what people would phone call 'politically correct' either.
What within the world does reckless driving enjoy to do with political correctness? Absolutely nought! Political correctness is about speech, not driving behaviour.

Studies have proven that cell phones distract drivers. So does putting on makeup, reading a broadsheet, changing clothes, and profusely of other insane things people do astern the wheel. Anyone who cause an accident this process and survives it should get a much stiffer cost than someone who made an honest mistake, and if giving tickets to these people formerly they cause an calamity reduces accident, I'm all for it.

By the opening, people who tailgate at 75 mph to bully ethnic group out of their way or swerve into the right turn lane to ratify other vehicles should hold their licenses lastingly revoked. These aggressive acts are inexcusable and can lone lead to disaster.
Yes, the world is too politically correct.
Like, you know, how we cant vote 'Merry christmas' anymore.God forbid we should insult someone. Like seriously...if someone said Merry Christmas to me..and I didnt celebrate I would simply say it subsidise. And If I know of someone who celebrates something else, later I will say Happy ____ w/e.even though I dont be pleased about it.
And like santa cant vote 'ho ho ho' because it insults people? similar to seriously...people...i dont know, they hold to stop. lol.
hope i was competent to answer your question.
NO.
They should lock up more Lawyers and distribute more Ministers to Guantanamo Bay!.
I don't think you know what that word routine.

Public safety have nothing to do near being politically correct.

The effect of chitchat on a cell phone while driving is similar to being drunk. Driving is an extremely insecure activity and the parliament must regulate it to protect the public. That is their job.
It adjectives depends how hungry and how many relations are politician's debt collectors for new law being setup for collections. Yes, forced collections can be legalised everyday
by respectively authorised law executor and the number of the increasing or stagnant law and fines amendment politician from 100 to 1000 contemporary minor laws to legalise more money collections from citizen individual setup in a year and 100-1000 Items for price hikes are mortal arranged for all citizens to support the quantitity of parliament personnel income, housing allowances, entertainment allowances, vehicles ownerships, instruction, marriages monogamy or polygamy, their children to enter politics every year depending on the population on inhabitants in the politics involve these collections if they are not doing foreign trades with other countries, they will hold to do massive collections and massive price hikes toward their own citizens to support salary for political organization that has be increasing by 10,000 people every year as income collectors on citizens. Again it adjectives depends on your country and the education and moral given by the senate you reside in to be terribly honest with this IQ experiment game. Some countries own fixed government size where on earth empty places are just on replacement of post where on earth others are
what we called the expanding governement , where on earth the government official will expand into a family group, upgraded into city population, multiple cities and the in one piece country will become a government nation eventually as debt collectors because they do not want to become the payer on price hikes and when adjectives the citizens become political debt collectors and no one desires to be the payer, collections will be targeting adjacent countries when everyone becomes permitted in setting up country law in legalising money collections target neighbouring countries eventually surrounded by years to come.
To be neutral no country entitle is mentioned here to avoid unneccessary extortions, you will have to see your own elected representatives yourself. Some countries with minor law offense, do not carry fines - only advise and training, other money making politics country just close to monetary fines even small small minor issues like chitchat to public in street, holding hand, parking a larger car subsequent to the politician, wearing miniskirts in town, guys have long hairs contained by public, eating enduring cooked farm animals, internet or press word what can be said and what cannot, press freedom, uncircumcised man, religions in mass medium advertisements, commercial posters and advertisement on swimwear etc, etc that is why within some countries these new law imposed daily/monthly/yearly to make money from adjectives civilians to pay politician benefits and luxuries approaching higher salary, free clubbing/entertainment allowances, free luxury cars, free mansions, free wifes, free petrol supply, free maids, free jets, free bangalows for every wife, free parkings. free toll compensation, free energy settlement etc. etc. Some country just provide advises on minor offenses and they do not put you surrounded by jail for couple mutual agreement on holding hand in public places for example. It depends on country and greediness of human spirit
Yes.

More Questions and Answers:
[1427] - [283] - [314] - [1957] - [1745] - [1462] - [2065] - [81] - [1981] - [992] - [429] - [2223] - [1694] - [229] - [1798] - [607] - [892] - [713] - [612] - [928]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: