Law Questions and Answers

Some ghetto-gangster guy who lives in duplicate apartment building as me , just threatened to shoot me?

he said that if he doesnt do it himself , he'd own a friend do it . It Probably is not credible and there is probably nought that can be done until this person if truth be told tries to harm me.

Answers: Actually, threatening to snuff out someone is actually unsanctioned. If you feel strongly plenty about it, I would report it to your local police department.

It is very soon called "making a terrorist threat" -- and if he is really surrounded by a gang, then they can be pursued beneath the RICO statutes.

That is, if he ever threatens anyone RICH...

why did he threatened to shoot you? Its not clear!!

You need to telephone call the police-if you are concern about the sanctuary of your life and others.

If this is not your concern-than you are basically as dangerous as this "ghetto-gangster guy".

Well show him some material heat, get a report at least.It will bring attention to your nouns through local records for somewhat "cleaning".
Don't confront him or aggravate the argument , just break out the squad on them.
Ta Da , watch'em run and hide.
We fix our neighbor hood pretty regularly, they can't afford any real counsel so they train up just taking the time off in secure unit.
Kinda like mowing the sward except the grass height is controlled by trimming the roots.

Why don't video game companies and movie studios adopt ideas from the public?

I own many great planning for a video game or movie, but no companies adopt suggestions from the public because its "unsolicited material". Many people enjoy great ideas for things close to this that would otherwised never have be thought of, so why can't companies legally adopt these suggestions?

Answers: They can legally adopt them, however it is a can of worms. They can not prove that you did not steal the idea for example.

If a company be to make a activity based upon your suggestion at hand is a possibility that they could be sued by you for stealing your idea. To avoid these kind of lawsuits many types of companies will not even look at "unsolicited materials.

Movie studios will not look at unsolicited script.

Record companies will not listen to unsolicited tapes and recordings.

Game companies are duplicate way.

Moreover, if the company come up with a hobby that had a similarity to your theory they could be sued by you even if they came up near the idea independently.

Therefore, they don't look at unsolicited concept as a defense to possible future lawsuits going on for ownership of an idea.

I am not a advocate. If you need permissible advice singular a licensed lawyer can contribute legal insist on.

Citizens advice above is unmoving on, and I can say that because digital entertainment startup companies are my business.

The means of access to go in the order of it are these:

1 - If you are nor interested in money, later share your ideas among the independent hobby developer crowd or learn how to do the programming yourself

2 - If you are interested within money, then you are looking at a intensely high risk, but potentially large return business. There are individuals and companies that participate contained by funding development to build a business. But a short time ago an idea short a business plan is not likely to interest anyone. Ideas are not a scarce commodity, but team that can build a product and deliver a service are. Work to prove you can do that, and you will start to get attention.

Is it illegal to cut a X'mas tree from public manor or forest?

In the news, nearby is a family lost surrounded by the woods looking for a x'mas tree. I would have thought i.e. illegal to cut down trees from public stop. Otherwise, our parks or forest close to cities will be bare minus trees.

Answers: CDF issues permits.

They cost $10 per tree, beside a limit of two per address, and you bring back a map showing where to run cut so that CDF can spread people around. It's a fun bearing to get a tree - I do it every year.

The lost relations DID have a licence. They were foolish, but not criminal.

Richard

Yes, that is to say completely illegal surrounded by my home state of Oregon at least. But we enjoy a zillion U-cut X-mas tree farms and the trees individual cost $10 and the its safe, so I don't know why anybody wouldn't basically go to one of those.

Emancipation, without court, this is correct right?

I'm asking for another creature, she wants to emancipate herself and move within with me and my parents. She wouldn't hold to support herself. I read that you don't have to progress to court to become emancipated, "Is it necessary to move about to court for a minor to be emancipated? No - There are situations in which a parent and child agree that a child may live within a certain method that other parents might forbid. There are many situations contained by which a child is emancipated without obtain approval from the court. Through an agreement between parent and child, the minor may be effectively partially or completely emancipated. For example, a minor may move out of the parent's house and be self supporting. There may be an actual agreement. Or the parent may simply not contest the situation and not constraint that the child return home." So as long as the parent agrees she can emancipate herself without court, correct? The site say this is "legal information" so I'm assuming it is correct.

Answers: You can never assume legalized "information" received here is correct.

What you have described is not trial "emancipation, " it is merely parental acquiescence contained by a living arrangement. Without a court order of freedom the minor cannot contract, admit itself to university, drop out of school, consent to medical procedures, prohibit medical treatment, enlist in the military, etc.,

You already asked this. See the answers to that quiz.

Generally no, she cannot emancipate herself without court approval.

Sure if her mom or dad agree that she can move out she will be emancipated from them.but she will not be 'legally emancipated'. For that you a short time ago go earlier a judge and he asks you and your parents if this is what everyone desires then he explains what the liberty means to the child one emancipated.in my skin it was, "you are very soon an adult, you are responsible for adjectives of your own bills, but beings you are not 18 you can still not drink, gamble or vote!"
All the responsibilities near none of the fun!
Good luck!
P.S. If it's not legal and her parents redeploy their minds they may be able to construct her move back home!

First every state hold different emancipation law.

Second if her parents don't approve this then she wants to go to court. If she move beside you without her parents consent or if they money their mind you and you family can be charged beside child endangerment and interfere with the custody of a minor.

If you are a manly and she is your girlfriend then you can be in motion to jail for have sex with a minor (depending of your jurisdiction).

She is not emancipated if she is not married or don't support herself. Moving next to you and having your parent clutch care of her it's NOT deliverance; that's just an unofficial custody of a minor.

Go to the court and avoid having social services and the police knock at your door. Because eventually someone will give them a send for if you try to play home-made lawyers.

She is a minor so walk to the court and do everything right.

Lowering drinking age????

I need reason to support FOR lowering drinking age to 18 for topics;

motor vehicle accidents due to drunk driving
associates can develop alchoholism
affect school work

Answers: It is illegal to drive drunk regardless of age.

The biggest argument within favor would be if you are old ample to vote, old adequate to get married, antiquated enough to die for your country, you are mature enough to enjoy a drink if you would like one.

How roughly Equal treatment under the statute.

At 18 you are an adult and can construct your own decisions.

With rights come responsibility and from 18 to 20 you do not enjoy equal treatment under the decree.

How does society today respond to guilt, crime, and sin?

Answers: If its their own, it ignores it. If someone else is the culprit, It give him hell!

With hypocrisy.
If you cry, you are called 'weak'
If you do NOT cry, you are call 'heartless'
If you break down and weep, you are call 'fake'
If you are stone hard, you are call 'cold and brutal'
You are cursed if you do
and cursed if you don't
Hypocrisy.

What are the procidures of becoming an emancipated adult contained by southdakota?

any help would be dearly apperciated if you know any sites that willanswer question that you cant i would also be very greatful.
thanx Valentina

Answers: SOUTH DAKOTA

TITLE 25. DOMESTIC RELATIONS

CHAPTER 25-5. PARENT AND CHILD

§ 25-5-19. Emancipation by express agreement -- Approval of circuit court.

Emancipation is express when it is by agreement of both parents if living, and but for, the surviving parent and the child. Any such express agreement of emancipation shall be presented to the circuit court of the county within which the child resides for approval. The court shall issue a declaration of freedom if it finds the emancipation would not be contrary to the child's best interest. The announcement of emancipation and a copy of the agreement shall be file by the clerk of courts.

§ 25-5-21. Duty of emancipated child to parent.

The legal duty of an emancipated child to his parent is matching as that of a child who has reach his majority.

§ 25-5-24. Emancipated minor defined.

Any person lower than the age of eighteen years who:

(1) Has entered into a valid marriage ceremony, whether or not such marriage be terminated by dissolution; or

(2) Is on active duty near any of the armed forces of the United States of America; or

(3) Has received a declaration of freedom pursuant to § 25-5-26; is an emancipated minor.

§ 25-5-25. Age of majority for certain purposes -- Parent or guardian liability.

An emancipated minor shall be considered as anyone over the age of majority for the following purposes:

(1) For the purpose of consenting to medical, chiropractic, optometric, dental or psychiatric care, in need parental consent, knowledge or liability;

(2) For the purpose of his dimensions to enter into a binding contract;

(3) For the purpose of his capacity to sue and be sued within his own name;

(4) For the purpose of his right to support by his parents;

(5) For purposes of the rights of his parents to his returns, and to control him;

(6) For the purpose of establishing his own residence;

(7) For the purpose of buying or selling real property;

(8) For the purpose of climax all vicarious liability of the minor's parents or guardian for the minor's torts; and

(9) For the purpose of enrol in any arts school or college.

Nothing in this slice may be construed to relieve the minor's parents or guardian from any liability for the torts of an emancipated minor if the liability arises out of an agency relationship, out of the operation of a motor vehicle as provided in § 25-5-15 or some other principle of tenet other than the parent-child relationship.

§ 25-5-26. Petition for freedom - Procedure.

A minor may petition the circuit court of the county in which he resides for a announcement of emancipation. The petition shall be verified and shall set forth beside specificity all of the following:

(1) That he is at most minuscule sixteen years of age;

(2) That he willingly lives separate and apart from his parents or guardian next to the consent or acquiescence of his parents or guardian;

(3) That he is managing his own financial affairs;

(4) That the source of his income is not derived from any activity declared to be a crime by the law of the State of South Dakota or the laws of the United States.

Before the petition is hear, such notice as the court deem reasonable shall be given to the minor's parents, guardian or other individual entitled to the custody of the minor, or proof made to the court that their addresses are unknown, or that for other reason such notice cannot be given. If a minor is a ward or dependent child of the state, mind shall be given to the appropriate state agency.

The court shall sustain the petition if it finds that the minor is a person that fulfills the requirements of this slot and that emancipation would not be contrary to his best interest.

If the petition is sustained, the court shall forthwith issue a testimony of emancipation, which shall be file by the clerk of court.

If the petition is denied, the minor may appeal to the Supreme Court.

If the petition is sustained, the parents or guardian may appeal to the Supreme Court if they have appeared surrounded by the proceeding and opposed the granting of the petition.

A declaration is conclusive evidence that the minor is emancipated.

§ 25-5-27. Rescission of allegation of emancipation.

A minor declared emancipated below §§ 25-5-26 or 25-5-19 or his conservator may petition the circuit court of the county in which he resides to rescind the statement.

Before the petition is heard, such identify as the court deems logical shall be given to the minor's parents or guardian or proof made to the court that their addresses are unknown, or that for other reason such notice cannot be given. However, no liability may accrue to any parent or guardian not given actual make out, as a result of rescission of the declaration of freedom, until such parent or guardian is given actual notice.

The court shall sustain the petition and rescind the allegation of emancipation if it finds that the minor is indigent and have no means of support.

If the petition is sustained, the court shall forthwith issue a court decree rescinding the declaration of deliverance granted under § 25-5-26, which shall be file by the clerk of court.

Rescission of the declaration of deliverance does not alter any contractual obligations or rights or any property rights or interests which arose during the time that the declaration be in effect.

§ 25-5-28. Declaration obtain by fraud voidable - Proceedings.

A declaration of deliverance obtained by fraud or by the withholding of things information is voidable. The voiding of any such declaration pursuant to this paragraph does not alter any contractual obligations or rights or any property rights or interests which arose during the time that the declaration be in effect.

A proceeding beneath this section may be commenced by any soul or by any public or private agency. Notice of the commencement of such a proceeding and of any order declare the declaration of deliverance to be void shall be consistent next to the requirements of § 25-5-27.

To get emancipated, you will involve to prove:
1. You are mature satisfactory to manage your own affairs. This is demonstrated by things approaching a clean criminal register, good grades etc.
2. You can support yourself financially. You will necessitate to show income and anticipated expenses.It is HIGHLY unlikely you have the income to rent an apartment, recompense all utilities and put food on your table.
3. That your welfare is better served by not anyone with your parents. Hating mom's rules will not collect this criteria.
4. That there are no other defensible solutions to the issues at home.

You will need to hire a attorney to get you though the process.

You would entail to file surrounded by a court that has jurisdiction over your parents or custodial parent if you do not live next to both.

Also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipatio...

EQual applicants are qualified for the job, how do you resolve this officially.?

How do you resolve this legally, make a contribution me the burden of proof. What law covers this or how do you resolve this lawfully

Answers: There is nothing to resolve "reasonably." There is also no legal requirement that an employer select the BEST applicant for a position. The ONLY requirement is that the employer does not put together a discriminatory decision concerning whom to hire. All the rest is employer discretion.

There's no law. The employer have the right to choose whichever applicant he likes better, so long as he doesn't stand his decision on an unauthorized factor, such as race or masculinity.

The same even applies if the two applicants have different score - there's no law to prevent the employer hiring the human being who scored lower, lately because he thinks he'd engineer a better employee.

Hiring test, etc, are just tools to relief an employer make a conclusion - they're not binding on him. (Except, in some cases, within government job where an agreement between the political affairs and a Union makes them so)

Richard

An employer is competent to select any qualified applicant unless there is within place a higher standard (from coalition rules or company hiring standards) such as the most qualified applicant.

I would solve this by increasing adding an other interview for each applicant done by the candidates prospective co-workers, down rank reports or higher smooth supervisors looking for soft skills.

Two people hired at duplicate time, how do legally resolve senority issues?

Show me the source where on earth I can research your answer. two people hired at impossible to tell apart time, same day , same minute, what are the official things you can use to pick who has the senority

Answers: They enjoy equal seniority. No problem.

The only time this might concern would be if there be a Union contract, and if there is, after the contract would have expression that governs this.

Richard

When I be hired by a company for a contract covered position that recognized seniority, within had to be (by contract) a randomizing of adjectives people hired simultaneously to assign seniority among those those.

Without such a practice in place to vindication for seniority "ties" there is NO legally recognized way to establish any difference contained by seniority, therefore they would be considered justifiably to have equal seniority.

Best of luck!

I would suggest that surrounded by manymany cases, job where "seniority" is an issue are the sorts of non-creative, non-innovative job that are ripe for outsourcing, and then seniority lend a hand nt at all.

I don;t know if to be precise the case surrounded by your example, as it is hard to think waitresses being outsourced, e.g., (but not drive through charge takers!), but something to think around...seniority won;t help you if the work can be done elsewhere cheaper.

Do you think this is fair( it may be)?

as a trick i put a kids hoody into a clean debris can he took it out and laughed it rotten, what i didnt know was that his 4 year behind the times ipod and his envie phone was contained by it. he was crying for a partially hour and an hour later a tutor found them both in the can covered surrounded by powerade, now i am forced to take-home pay him over 200$ is it fair that i own to, i didnt lose his stuff and i didnt put the powerade on it why should i have to take-home pay when i can barely afford to get through

Answers: Your action (putting the hoody surrounded by the can) was the proximate effect of the electronics being ruined. But for your conduct, it would not have happen. Hence, you are liable.

yes, it is fair that you would own to pay to compensate for the spoil that occurred.

While you did at one remove cause the injure (pouring the power aide on the electronics), you indirectly caused it by placing the hoodie contained by the trash. The person that disposed of the drink have every reason to believe that doing so would not mete out damage as it be a trash can.

The fact that you did not know the electronics be in his jacket does not relieve the liability any.

If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
sorry

you are responsible for your actions,whether honourable or bad.you took someones property and freshly so happens it be damaged.quit making excuses and gain an extra job.if it be your property you would be asking for the same treatment. do unto others as you would hold them do unto you.

you took what wasn't yours -- joke or not -- and you know it wasn't yours. then the consequences of your whereabouts injured his property.

Man up. Pay.

It's absolutely neutral.

You are a bully and have no high regard for the rights of other human beings.

You got rotten really light. You entail to learn to consider about the rights of others or you will find yourself contained by prison.

Native come back and trade name your living in your own homeland.

More Questions and Answers:
[1401] - [1895] - [2484] - [60] - [777] - [1700] - [1259] - [1314] - [2193] - [998] - [632] - [267] - [2490] - [908] - [1165] - [530] - [262] - [2156] - [1558] - [2452]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: