Law Questions and Answers
UK: Should prostitution be made illegal to barney the sex slave industry?
Talks are starting to consider making prostitution illegal within the UK, in a bid to face-off the illegal sex slave industry.Could interdiction prostitution, simply put it underground, and make it more profitable for the sex slave industry, as they are already immoral?
Answers: it is simply the stupidity of government.
prostitution man made illegal will not stop the sex slave industry, explicitly a separate issue all together. it have nothing to do near the legal sex industry.
i for one do not approve of whats officially recognized now, but those have a right to do as they please so long as they motive no one else damage.
sex slaves are not prostitutes they are SLAVES forced to do what they do. it is not a choice. the two are not connected in anyway save for the media or politicians need a vote or women's groups willing to be in somebody`s space their idea of morality and women's rights regardless of others evaluation.
And Women like LILLY (answer 2 above) who expect men make women want to be prostitutes and we exploit them. utter pug-wash. i respect women so don't include me within your radical feminism.
What ever is eventually granted it will not change the facts
would enjoy thought legalising it would be the answer
then near could be regulation
The Labour party have an old academy puritanical feminist agenda and it has nought to do with sex slavery prevention. They only just want to stop people have sex for money because like occupation MP Dennis MacShane they all regard as it's "dirty". You should have hear him in Parliament the other week discussion about and I quote "Dirty feeble men, dirty middle aged men and dirty young men".
I deduce prostitution means sexual and financial freedom for all those who whip part surrounded by it by choice - which is the majority of sex workers.
Edit:
Following up on Mr Skeptic's challenge to me below.
He say "The vast, inestimable majority of women in prostitution are prisoners - prisoners contained by fact, prisoners of poverty, prisoners of drugs, prisoners of abuse".
That sounds approaching Christian soldier rhetoric to me, not grounded in reality. There are thousands of women working as escorts in the UK and elsewhere by choice because they approaching the money. Maybe some would say that these women are prisoners of wantonness but if they don't consider themselves to be victims then why should I or anybody else?!
I don't assume it is possible to make prostitution informal. How?
Keeping it legal provides the safest course of controlling the sex slave industry, but they need to tighten up on this.
More minister to and advice for girls who approaching this work is what is needed, as many tend to rely on those who control them.
And for those of you reading this maxim that prostitution is illegal you are wrong it never have been. It is unjust to solicit for sex and various other things connected beside it are illegal.
It's already dishonest in the U.S. contained by all but a few isolated areas and there's still a big problem next to it.
The only bearing to eliminate the problems are to normalize and government regulate it so that within are no huge profits to be made by the sex slave traders.
By the way, I don't see the difference between it mortal illegal to solicit sex and prostitution self illegal. One is the perform and the other is the bartering. Even though the law are worded only give or take a few the solicitation, where I live, they run the prostitutes bad on a regular basis and use other law to arrest them if they don't leave.
Edit: I reason that people on here are spending too much time worrying almost whether prostitution itself is illegal or not. The certainty is, that without solicitation, the prostitution could not take place; it would just be consensual sex - the money is what make it prostitution.
So, having said that, why don't we adjectives concentrate on the actual question which is "warfare the sex slave industry" - not debating on whether prostitution is legal or unfair.
Prostitution is illegal, but contained by my opinion it shouldn't be.
There is clearly a bazaar for it, so there should be legalised brothels that can be controlled by local authorities.
No one should be force to trade sex, but those who choose to should be allowed.
Its the oldest trade in the world
even if every country baned it
it would still travel on illegally
woman are the weaker sex my ar-e they are
they are sitting on a gold ingots mine.
joyeux noel Mon Ami's
The oldest profession? There's a few million neolithic hunter-gatherers would like a word.
Where a commodity is contained by demand, but restricted by statute, that is the green frothy for organised crime to make millions. Whether it's drink, drugs, sex, anything - if the public want it, and the government say-so they can't have it, the criminals will supply it.
The pragmatic postion would be to legalise, regulate and control the industry. If you fashion it legal, you can put the criminals out of business, protect those selling the commodity and ensure a risk-free supply of the commodity to the consumer.
If that is not proper for the sex industry, perhaps applying law which already exist more rigorously would be the answer. It is already illegal to supply drugs to associates, to force them to take dishonest drugs, to imprison them unlawfully, to assault them, to live bad the earnings of prostitution. The explotative elements of prostitution are already unjust.
Many of the women involved are in the country improperly and fear for what might surface to them if they come to the attention of the authorities - perhaps a more humane approach to their asylum / immigration status might see them to come forward safely?
While I would not want to suggest that "KEYPOINT" is a user of prostitutes, his quote:
"I consider prostitution means sexual and monetary freedom for all those who lift part contained by it by choice - which is the majority of sex workers."
is complete and utter rubbish, and the sort of nonsense that men who use these women come out beside to salve their own consciences.
The inestimable, vast majority of women within prostitution are prisoners - prisoners in reality, prisoners of poverty, prisoners of drugs, prisoners of abuse. Perhaps men who use prostitution could be shown the conditions overriding to their 'hosts' situation and shown how little of the money they pay, if any, go to the women.
Perhaps a couple of well-publicised trials where customers of in prison girls stood trial for rape - after all, do the girls in fact consent to sex? If the answer's no, how isn't it a rape?
I think KEYPOINT is over-estimating the extent of the "escort / callgirl" side of the sex industry - men paying serious money for companionship and sex, where on earth the women have more control; and underestimate the extent of the "street whore" side of the industry where for the price of a few pints, the subsidise of a car or a hindmost room in a wipe parlour is the setting. It is the latter case where on earth the desparate women are truly prisoners. Most are so broken that they don't regard themselves as anything, consent to alone victims - which means KEYPOINT have no need to verbs about them.
No. It is underground as it is. Legalising it can bring roughly speaking greater benefits.
As it is, sex workers can have untreated sexually transmitted diseases putting clients, and more importantly, the regular partner of those clients (if any) at risk. Legalising it, like it is contained by Holland can result in better sexual condition and also restrict the sex slave industry.
Put it this way, it is a damm verbs harder to force someone to work in a officially recognized and regulated industry, than it would be now.
Hello,
(ANS) This is a massively contentious subject nouns, should prostitution be legal or unsanctioned? Because its a morally (ethically) difficult issue there are plentiful wide range opinions.
**I am clearly and totally against ANYONE being forced against their will, or coerced, or tricked into sexual slavery. I am against individuals from any country being trafficked or treated as products or a commodity in lay down to make money from them.
**On the other mitt I don't think the problems associated near prostitution can be or will be solved by making sex in exchange for money unofficial.
**May be one of the very few solutions is to produce legalized red light districts, surrounded by large towns & cities located away from residential areas, a place where on earth sex for money can be conducted legally (or next to the authorities turning a blind eye) AND where the sex workers can be licensed and hold to prove where they come from and as condition of working be made to have regular condition check up's etc.
**I think outlawing prostitution will almost certainly trade name the whole sex industry a far more chancy and send both workers & punters underground. I chew over it would make it far more difficult to control too.
**I've see several TV documentaries about Polish & Latvian girls kidnap into the sex trade but eventually rescued. ALL of the stories were other shocking, upsetting, very disturbing & heart braking. You wouldn't longing this kind of treatment on an animal tolerate alone a young girl or woman. YES! some attempts must be made to stop the trade within young women & girls from other countries into the sex trade.
Ivan
def yes, men enjoy always exploited women and it should stop, they might swot up to respect us more.
Garnishment question?
My hubby is getting sued for anyone default on a loan. We hold a court date set for February. However, they've put a hold on our bank narrative for $83 until March. Can creditors garnish your sandbank account? If so, can they do it formerly the court date?Answers: Your accounts can be garnished if the court think that you might empty out the story beforhand.
Not as a rule; there have to be a judgement of some type ordered by a court for an actual garnishment to be in place; I'd check beside the bank and see who in fact placed the hold and on what authority,
If you owe it, you go to court to attempt to give pleasure to the claim without have a garnishment placed and avoid some of the fees.
Yes, it is little known but contained by certain cases, "Holds" may be placed on some of your accounts. I'm not sure that they can frills your bank justification before a court date tho.
Is it legal to buy a taser surrounded by Canada?
Answers: only if you dont seize caught
Passing a law?
I am interested within trying to get a imperative passed in the state of Kentucky. How exactly should I progress about doing this? Who would I enjoy to write? How can I get citizens to sign a petition?I know nothing just about this subject, so any and all information that you can grant me would be MUCH appreciated.
Answers: It is best to start with your senators and representatives contained by state government. You are their constituent (you vote within their district, presumably) so they are more likely to listen to you and your concept. Here is the web page to find out who are your designates:
http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/Legislators.h...
If a child support agency will not enforce my order, who do I contact? The state Attorney General?
I own a Nevada Court Order and my ex lives in Idaho. The demand states he is to pay $248.00 current and 284.00 In arrearages every month. The defence worker lowered his arrearage payment to $25.00 per month and the arrearage stability is $27,500.00 which will take 90 years to wage off. The state imperative in Idaho is that they can frills up to 50% and they are not doing that. They refuse to lift my calls surrounded by Idaho and my Case worker in Ohio never know what is going on and tells me nearby is nothing I can do. How can I procure him thrown in young offenders` institution or his license suspended? Should I involve the D.A. and the Attorney General in his state?Answers: First of adjectives, I don't know if answering this is worthwhile, as you seem to report society who tell you the truth. You already did this to my wife, and I wonder if you didn't do it to everyone who posted something that you did NOT want to hear hear.
Here's the truth:
If the bag worker lowered his arrearages, it was inwardly the guidelines of the caseworker's responsibility. Federal Law, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, merely allows garnishment of up to 50% of his disposable income, after taxes and legal deduction. (The government get theirs before YOU.) That's the directive. So if you feel they are not taking 50%, what is it 50% of? You will never grasp 50% of his gross income. That's illegal and it won't come up.
Second, if he is this far behind, he is already restricted by federal statute in his knack to travel, as he cannot get a passport, or take off the confines of the US. He has to wage his support in full in the past he can go to Canada, Mexico, or anywhere else.
You can with the sole purpose get him thrown within jail or license suspended if he is not paying anything, and you can prove that he have the ability to settle, and get him until that time a judge and convicted of contempt. That is the regulation, like it or not.
The standard concensus of case workers is that getting some support is better than no support. His debt will simply continue to grow until it is rewarded.
Part of the problem is that you have a Nevada directive, being executed on someone within Idaho, and apparently paying you in Ohio. This make the burden cross 3 state jurisdictions to be enforced, even if the overnight case is assigned to the state of Ohio.
Even if you get the D.A. or the State Attorney General involved, which one will you seize involved?
You might want to consider thinking about what is best for your kid, and approach your ex almost some form of settlement to make this progress away. If he has any extra money, it may be worth taking a lower percentage one time and calling it appropriate rather than waiting 90 years to collect.
Keep surrounded by mind that as the debt grows, the interest of the case workers will grow, if it appears he is not making any attempts to take-home pay. I suspect he has a garnishment on his wages, and that he is communicating near the appropriate agency in lay down to show good principle. All of this is evidence that he is trying to comply with the command, and the state won't even start a case against him.
Do you want to drive him underground, or do you want to collect what you can?
So that you are clear I've answered your interrogate now. Like it or not. So shift ahead and report me so they deduct points, or get rid of my account. I don't diligence.
Get over your anger, and stop picking on my wife. All she did was answer your put somebody through the mill and tell you the truth. I expect you'll delete this, and seize pissed, probably have a drink or seven, consequently write a huge rant to everyone about how ethnic group are picking on you and you're the victim because someone out at hand told you the truth, while all the other idiots out at hand who feel they are victims whip your side. Take a clue from the folks in Idaho. If they don't clutch your calls, it's probably because they've talk to you until they are blue in the obverse and they are sick of you. State agencies have that authority. If they find you to be hysterical and unreasonable, they don't own to help you. Take a look at yourself and grow the **** up. People resembling you are the reason I don't spend greatly of time on Yahoo answers.
Your options depend on the law in your state - for example, some states allow intercepts of levy returns every year.
You may qualify for free legal warning or assistance from a non-profit organization within your state.
Below please find a link to several online endorsed resources for Nevada, including links to organizations that provide free endorsed services.
I have also down a link for Idaho, but if your decree is from a Nevada Court that may be where you are going to go and get the most help near this case. I can't furnish you legal proposal but I suggest that you first try to find a Nevada attorney to talk to.
I hope you follow if you throw him in young offenders` institution and he loses his job he won't be paying you anything. So it sounds resembling you are willing to carry your revenge even if it means you won't be getting compensated. You might want to watch yourself...if you try to take him thrown in lock up...they might end up lowering his payments again, departure you with even smaller quantity. The reason he is NOT going to be thrown contained by jail is because HE IS PAYING and they don't throw parents contained by jail or suspend their license for paying their child support...even if they are behind. You necessitate counseling to get over your anger.
Are lawyers gazetted officer?
Answers: An officer is called gazetted when his/her appointment is notify in govt gazettee. If a attorney is appointed to an office by bearing of a gazett notification he will act as gazetted officer.
But when he is doing his private practise he is not.
Well lawyer are not really officers but neither are they "liars" similar to one of the users has commented. He seriously requirements to recheck his definition and understanding of statute and lawyers.
Lawyers are lawyer unless they become a judge. Even Advocate Generals are of late "Advocates."
Weapons..HELP!!?
Hi everyone, I work in a small boutique surrounded by NYC and I heard nearly a woman who got stabbed weeks ago contained by her shop..NOW..what kind of weapon can I hold legally?I'm not the owner so I'm not even thinking around a gun..
What about mace?
the boutique is outstandingly small..I don't have anywhere to run...and above adjectives I don't have change..we work only near credit cards..
Any advice???
Answers: since you are not the owner, you inevitability to check with the owner more or less keeping weapons on your personality while at work. Most businesses will not permit the carrying of military capability. There are some that will.
If your business owner allows weapons, consequently they may be carried in an evident manner unless expressly prohibited by local or state tenet. This is how private security officer can carry foot guns and mace.
The reason that most business owners don't want their team armed is that people may over counter to a situation. If you get some nut errand in the store that wants to leave but won't, it would be adjectives too easy to verbs out the mace and take them down. This is not a trial use of the mace. If the person is not hurting you or threatening you, next you can't mace him.
I have carried a small pocket axe at work and every where else I dance for years and years. I have never needed it as a weapon. I own opened thousands of junk mail, boxes and such with it. I guess if I ever entail it for a weapon, it will be there.
Working within retail there is other a risk that some will try and rob you. It is a low risk and you really shouldn't worry something like it.
NYC sucks for getting any type of self defense weapon not to mention using it without individual hammered beside problems from court.
Why would you live in such a rabble bag nouns full of thugs and psycho morons who really need to be executed on the spot.
I would move the hell out of in that and work somewhere else like far south as Florida or west to Arizona in that you can work for better wages and be able to keep yourself with little problems within court.
New york is a joke of a place to live no constitution and its full of slime
I am in a officially recognized dispute with employer over injury at work.?
C-9 request for surgery on rt shoulder be submitted by my Ortho Dr ,employer denied me treatment,by stating injury was not work related .Hired legal representative ,claim went to the Industrial Commission of Ohio .District Hearing Officer approved claimMy Dr have already performed Orthoscopic Surgery ,but because employer is once again appealing further treatment be denied (physical therapy) so now 2.5 mths following Dr says surgery is needed again because no follow up treatment be allowed ,retore what he fixed ,and has very soon progressed into a worse condition,requiring even more drastic measures to fix .
My employer has hired a up to date team of lawyer to bring me down and now desires me to co-operate with them by seeing an employer rewarded Dr ,calling it an independent evaluation.
How can they call it that if they are paying for the call on ?
Can and or should I refuse to walk ?
Is this now turning into personal injury grip
This same employer didn't call me an ambulance when I have a heart attack at work
Answers: You need a attorney and yes you have to consent to there doctor look at you but zilch else
Get a lawyer and SUE his BUTT rotten. I think he would repay your bills instead of spending money to fight you and loose surrounded by court.
I live in Massachusetts and where on earth I live there is a program call Workman's Compensation administered by the state. They are the final word. So he is breaking the law.
I have an accident surrounded by 2001 and I am still getting medical coverage through that program. The accident be 6 years a go. I am presently 70 and retired.
Make sure the lawyer's major practice is contained by Workman's Compensation.
A friend of mine was jerk around by lawyers for over 5 years. He followed everything "their" lawyer said to do. His employer was not much relieve. Be patient! Dont do something stupid! this is what "they" want! Follow thru next to what you began, & you may win similar to my friend!
Another instance I know of was impossible to tell apart way. Sooner or latter, you'll win, an they know it!
Contact the Bar Association for a good legal representative
I believe they have a right to enjoy you examined by their Doctor (They must pay for it, of course). Have you considered contacting the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ? If they lug your case they will provide lawyer free. BTW, because physical therapy be denied by your employer is not a good object NOT to have physical psychiatric help. Next time do the therapy on your own, if important and worry give or take a few the bill later. This sounds similar to A torn Rotator cuff. If it is, you MUST do the therapy or you could own major problems.
the problem is that your contained by Ohio and the worker's comp in Ohio is VERY different than it is surrounded by any other state. but--you need to hire your own attorney. the employer is allowed to call for for an independent eval, but as long as your drs treatment notes support everything, the employer's dr doesn't own much of a choice. don't refuse the appt but definately grasp an attorney. most of them will take the overnight case and get $$ out of your settlement, and it suck to own to pay an attorney-but you're going to requirement one. don't turn it into a personal injury case---if you do that, you throw away any rights to pursue it as worker's comp. the deal near the heart attack- you should have sued when it happend, but immediately it would just build you look "disgruntled" which usually ticks off courts. you might also want to request a case mgmt. nurse-they own to provide one if you ask for one. they are really good something like making sure you get the assistance you need. right luck
What was the ruling for Baroda state edge vs peck?
Answers: You can go to lawresearch.com and verbs up the info.
What is the importance of classifying statute into legal system,system of statute,branches,sub-branches,institutes?
legal system, system of directive, branches, sub-branches, institutes and rulesAnswers: I'm not entirely clear on what you are asking, but I'll take a guess. In the U.S., nearby are numerous sources of law. There is the federal constitution, federal statutes, federal regulations created by agencies, federal executive information, state constitutions, state statutes, state agency regulations, state common directive, municipal ordinances, etc. To some scope, this is not so much by design as by historical happenstance. Settlers formed forts, which became cities, which have local governments and local law. Eventually cities were combined over government controlling larger territories, which following became states. So presently there be both city-made law and statewide tenet. Then came the Articles of Conferation, the Constitutional Convention, and so forth. This is the historical, "how-it-happened" explanation for the United States surrounded by a nutshell. Any other country will have its own history, recurrently similar, and always near the result that there are more local governing bodies sharing power next to governments over larger territory.
Why is it important? Well, we could surrounded by theory re-write the system from scrape, say, to wipe out all smaller government and just enjoy federal law over adjectives. That would simplify things in a unshakable sense, and promote more uniformity in the rights and obligation shared by our citizenry. However, that would make the system smaller number responsive to local needs, local sentiments, and local voice. So, we could go the other way--just enjoy states, or just enjoy cities. But then we lose the benefits of large-scale cooperation, such as the FDA, the interstate highway system, and the military. So, maybe some form of power-sharing between small and large government provides the best mix of responsiveness and capability to pedal large tasks.
More Questions and Answers:
[2360] - [2037] - [1867] - [1953] - [2454] - [2476] - [1161] - [557] - [1253] - [2094] - [1008] - [2043] - [890] - [2084] - [832] - [688] - [1887] - [11] - [962] - [1143]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: