Law Questions and Answers

What's the best way to business deal with an member of staff who always looks for the "gray" areas?

Every time I contribute her a new impression or a project to finish, whenever I discuss a new corporate policy, she finds some gray nouns around it and then argues against it. If I utter, “Okay then, what’s your concept?” she just give me a ton of hazy answers. What is the best path to deal near someone like that? By the course, I don’t have the opportunity of firing her at this time.
Thanks.
Answers: Thank her for her input and then recount her to do it your way. If she continues to sputter, enlighten her your mind is made up and you would like her to procure to work on the project.
I would just transmit her what needs to be done. If she can come up near a concrete answer have her write it down. Make copies for you and her ( bullet points) and manufacture her stick to them.
Is this person research disabled?
Give her busy work until she quits.
The next time they come looking for the gray issues, transport them to the "gray water dump" slice of your local state park.
i think u get a personnality problem here she's not cooperating with u is she cooperating next to someone else or is she after your job conceivably ,office politics i cogitate.
My impression is that she is doing this for the sake of person difficult, rather than wanting to really be informative. If this is the case, after I would give her the routine time to day work specifically more black and white. If she has a problem beside that, I would be honest with her and share her that she seems to enjoy had difficulty completing to tasks.
later don't ask for her opinion. bestow her other duties untill you do have the pick of DOWN SIZING. your the boss, play the game. theres nil like in the lead , BY THEIR RULES.
She is creating problems because she thinks your decision might adversely affect her and she doens't really trust your decisions . You involve to be more understanding and assure her that she won't loose anything if she follows your outlook.
If you are in charge...
"Thank you for your input, but let's do it my passageway for now."

How do I file a officially recognized response to a civil lawsuit in CA?

I wrote a response reminder in regard to my civil suit, but I need to check it's authenticity. If you have the comprehension of checking for legality, I will transport you the letter via email. I do not hold money for a lawyer and I'm person wrongfully accused by a company I used to work for. I'm anyone sued for contract violations and they are seeking damages of over $100,000 - unlimited.

I am mortal accused of soliciting and assisting another employer, which never happen.

I'm not really sure on who to turn to, as google has given me no luck. I also go to the website listed on the papers I be served, but I never found any legal forms or lend a hand.
Answers: I AM NOT A LAWYER. NOTHING IN THIS POST SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE. ONLY LICENSED LAWYERS CAN GIVE LEGAL ADVICE. I URGE YOU TO GET A LICENSED LAWYER ASAP! The infromation below assumes your case is contained by California!

Having said that you can probably answer with a California Judicial Council form for an "Answer Contract". There is a cooperation to the table of contents for California Judaical Council Forms below

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/form...

This link go to the form, but I notice near are two of them, so check them both.

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/forms/docume...

You will have to permeate in the form and give somebody a lift it to the courthouse with check for the payment. It's maybe $250. You can telephone call the Court Clerk or just bring your checkbook to the courthouse next to your answer. You will need a proof of service form. Once you folder the answer then copies must be promptly sent to adjectives parties to the litigation.

Here is a linl to some informatiom on contracts at NOLO Press which sell "do it yourself" law books.

Unfortunately, the complexity of the defence that you are involved in will require the expertise of a licensed legal representative.

http://www.nolopress.org/resource.cfm/ca...

This may buy you some time, but it is critical that you get official advise from a licensed advocate.

Civil cases are complex and, unfortunately, your problems are of late beginning.

You might know how to get a attorney from legal aid. Call your local pub association and ask them if they can refer you to an appropriate lawyer.

I AM NOT A LAWYER. NOTHING IN THIS POST SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE. ONLY LICENSED LAWYERS CAN GIVE LEGAL ADVICE. I URGE YOU TO GET A LAWYER ASAP!
when you necessitate medical help, you shift to a doctor.
when you need financial oblige, you go to an accountant
when you inevitability any sort of help you dance to the appropriate professional. for legal assistance, this would be a lawyer. did you not know that?


I guess he didn't approaching my answer. he sent me this message:
"You answer questions in need even ******* reading them. That's pretty ******* douchey to me. You ******* douchey bloody **** rag."
Your response must be within the form of an "answer". If the complaint was "verified", or signed by an officer of the company that is to say suing you, your answer must specifically admit or deny every allegation.

Your answer should also include your "affirmative defenses", a index of legal reason why they cannot win. These are not factual reason. They are things like--the statute of limitations has expired, in that was no contract surrounded by writing, etc.

The answer must be in the format required by the California Rules of Court.

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/form...

When you database the answer, you be required to pay a file fee of almost $300.

This is going to be very, amazingly hard for you to do yourself. Please rethink your verdict to try to do it alone and see if you can find a way to hire an attorney.

Otherwise, I am persuaded you will end up losing this armour.
I am not an expert in ruling... but i figured any aid might help you.
You really should try to find officially recognized help ( lawyer) . but if you don't own the funds . you got a great deal of work to do. Find an attorney that gives FREE consultations.. progress to the library and read everything you can find on the subject.. in reality there might be one on column. ????
I have also see lawyers that work Pro Bono ( for free) to serve people basically like you.check them out.

http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/prob...

You can also ask the court for an extension while you desire legal council, to win more time.
Best of luck to you Be strong and keep at it...

Is MyP2P.EU legal?

I be recommended the website http://www.myp2p.eu for watching soccer games. Can someone tell me if this is allowed or not? Please include details. Thanx.
Answers: by definition P2p's are legal, it's the content they put out or allow to be put out that change that. If you are in the obedient ol' USA then it would be unsanctioned to view anything to be exact broadcast by the cable networks without WRITTEN authorization. However, who is going to come after you??

Is it breaking the law if you put a picture of a miner on your my space, w/o the parents consent?

Answers: It's not against the imperative to post pictures of miners, but you might get fined if you post pictures of farmers.
Most coal miners live on their own and don't inevitability parental consent for anything.

It is not illegal to post non-sexual photos of your friends beside their permission.
Most miners are big bizarre brutes with tattoos and scar. Why would you need to ask their parents anything?

Richard
Neither is unsanctioned; the coal type or the underage type. No one owns their image. I can put your picture up on the internet in need your consent, as long as I own the film/media on which it is stored (and I don't defame or slander you).

Why would people who refute the death cost think that go would be more humane?

These are the same general public who support euthanizing innocent people and animals on the justification that not all lives are worth living and time should not always be prolonged. What purpose does keeping someone alive to punish them for the rest of their lives serve besides some hollow revenge for the victims, and how is that smaller quantity painful than taking the trouble-free way out of shame by end one's life. Opponents of the departure penalty might read aloud it hurts the families of the defendants, but they didn't exactness that terry schiavo's parents wanted her to live. And even when an animal get hurt, it still tries to survive.And there are criminals who try to choose the loss penalty because they quality it would end their own suffering. Besides if family of murderers should be allowed to decide their providence, we might as well freshly let them go and get off beside a slap on the wrist or not punish them and just consent to them go home, since that's what they really want but know they can't receive so they reluctantly settle for less.
Answers: Opposing the passing penalty does not parsimonious you sympathize with brutal criminals. You don't own to condone their acts or want them to avoid a awful punishment to ask if the death cost prevents or even reduces crime and to mull over about the risks of executing innocent nation.

125 people on release rows have be released with proof that they be wrongfully convicted. DNA is available in smaller amount than 10% of all homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent nation.

The death cost doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the death cost to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The death cost is neither. Homicide rates are higher within states and regions that have it than within those that don’t.

We have a dutiful alternative. Life without parole is presently on the books surrounded by 48 states. It means what it say. It is sure and swift and rarely appealed. Life short parole is less expensive than the release penalty.

The departure penalty costs much more than natural life in prison, mostly because of the permitted process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent people.

The loss penalty isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants next to the worst lawyers. It doesn't apply to ancestors with money. When is the later time a wealthy entity was on passing row, let alone executed?

The passing penalty doesn't necessarily minister to families of murder victims. Murder target family member across the country argue that the drawn-out death cost process is painful for them and that vivacity without parole is an appropriate alternative.

Problems next to speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent people released from passing row had already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent creature.
*The only point humane refers to is there "feelings". It have nothing to do next to societies real time conditions.

Legal Protection in The Court Building from Process Service?

Am I correct contained by believing that once you are in The Federal Court of Australia's Precinct, the Court protects you against the service of other Court matter?? I have to progress to Court again and I believe that a process server will attempt to serve papers in a related situation whilst I am answering the request of teh court to attend.
Answers: Probably not. In the US, they can serve you anywhere they find you, including a courthouse. What would make a courthouse exempt? If not inside the building, they could serve you surrounded by the parking lot.
brSee Rules 58-72 on Service of Prcess in Australia. I see no exemption from service within the Federal court of Australia. I will post more if I find it.
http://www.courts.sa.gov.au/lawyers/dc_r...

Mother gives 13 year antediluvian and friends laughing gas to get glorious!!?

LAKE ELSINORE, Calif. - The mother of a 13-year-old boy has be arrested for supplying nitrous oxide, or laughing gas, used during her son's ditch parties at their Lake Elsinore home.

Maria Antonia Mendez be arrested for providing the gas used by the teens to get elevated. Riverside County sheriff's Sgt. Evan Petersen says the teens skipped academy and hung out at the home.

Police began investigating the travel case after a school officer notice repeated absences of a group of students. Canisters of nitrous oxide be found by deputies serving a search warrant Monday evening.

Investigators enunciate the teenagers filled balloon with the gas and inhaled it.

The sergeant say the 28-year-old mother also participated within the nitrous parties. She be booked for investigation of multiple counts of child endangerment and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.


Who can believe this?? Are people really this not cognizant??
Answers: Well, she was 28 which channel she gave birth to this child when she be 15...so she probably never grew up and doesn't know how to be a responsible adult. I expect to hear more from this store, close to she was have sex with some of these kids. Pathetic.
i can.
yes
28 year ancient mother with a 13 year elderly son.

Do the math. Sounds like a nice familial to start with.

Richard

Do you agree with me that the minimum age to appear contained by pornography should be increased to 21 years?

Give your reasons if you disagree. In my feelings an 18-year-old is too young and not fully formed to decide despite doesn`t matter what law say about him/her.
Answers: My answer is one and the same as for the drinking age.

If a person is infirm enough to run to war and assume the responsibilities of an entire country, next they should be old ample to drink, appear in a porno, etc etc.
I devise 21 should be the age every one becomes an mature.
I agree though.
YEP.
Yes, I strongly agree with you.
idea guilty???
18 is immature...
but i dunno...
some population need to sort mistakes like that.
Why 21? There are lots of associates who are immature at 26. Should we be aobut preserving youth? A few hundred years ago those were considered matured at 16 and before that at 14.

I suppose a better answer is leave it at 18 (because they'll be out of illustrious school) and to have more begin discussion on sexuality, responsibility (not preaching, but honest discussion) so people revise not to be so uptight about their and other's sexuality. Perhaps after they can think more clearly on the subject and spawn a better decision FOR THEMSELVES - not for you.

Also: By 18 a personality should have a obedient idea of their sexuality - what they want and don't want. If they don't want to be involved contained by porno - they won't. But if they like sex and ponder of it as good verbs fun, then that's their attitude. It's solitary prudes and people who suspicion their sexuality that make existence miserable for those who enjoy their sex ands see zilch wrong with exploring and playing next to it.
Mind, I'm talking aobut educating youth on sxexuality - the pleasures and the danger so they can make compitent decision and not be fooled or scared.
yes cos of wat tis have led to.. child ill-treat.. yes..

The profit that can be generated from selling such descriptions is seen as a factor contained by encouraging the original name-calling that is photographed or film.

The children's charity NCH has claimed that emergency for child pornography on the Internet has lead to an increase in sex treat roughly cases.
Yes I agree!!! at eighteen, most young adults are fresh out of lofty school pretty much, and uncommonly ever know what they're going to do next. (hey, that's me!)
The three year block that follows graduation is probably one of the most central times in a person's energy, as far as self-identity goes. Believe it or not, a great deal of maturing happens here for most inhabitants.
I think it would be smart to dally a while before making a edict to expose oneself like that. It wouldn't hurt!
Who know? Maybe by raising the minimum age, the empire who previously considered pornography as a career would realize that, by getting themselves into that situation, they would be promotion their bodies, along with the several others who have fall into the same trap.
The body is no longer a mystery when it is exposed for adjectives eyes to see. It merely becomes an goal of stimulation, and the spectators become animalistic. After all, to be precise all pornography is. There is no tricks to it.
I think it Should be 20 OR 21 as ably.. 18 yrs old is still a youth... I've always thought that the lawful age should be at least 20 since it's out of the teens.

Plus it basically makes it nouns more pedophile-ish to say "Teen porn" when they're 18, however still teens.
I AGREE WITH YOU.
18 IS STILL BEING IN THE "TEEN" BRACKET, BEING AN ADOLESCENT, SO 21 SEEMS A NICE IDEA
Age shall not be criteria. It shall be bust size.
I dont think age make any difference here.The government within many countries including India freely allows pornography and the police are so non-judgmental with the prostitutes.AGE MAKES ZERO DIFFERENCE IF A WOMAN WANTS TO SELL HERSELF.You cant stop a woman from selling herself and she may story about her age.PEOPLE AT 15 ARE APPEARING IN PORN,this newly shows how WESTERN culture is influencing our dupatta wearing indian women.
is 18 like and entry where on earth earlier evils and taboo become good?
its in recent times like truism u can rape some1 after 18 because then ur matured

Would it be illegal for Nickelodion to fire Jamie Lynn Spears for man pregant?

Jamie Lynn just confirmed that she is pregnant at 16 years out-of-date. She is star of the hit Nickelodeon show "Zoey 101" If they were to fire her, would that be sex nouns based on pregnancy? Could she bring a lawsuit against them for unlawfully firing her? I don't suppose any girl/woman should be fired based on pregnancy!
Answers: It totally depends on what her contract say. If there is some characteristics of morality or image clause contained by the contract they may have the court prerogative to fire her.

BTW - Did you realize that she is a minor child? Does it not shock you that someone got this child pregnant? I probably shouldn't be, but I'm merely a little floored that at 16 she is coming out beside this information like it's no big do business. Call me old fashioned, doesn`t matter what. I know that kids this age (and younger) get pregnant everyday, but do they call for to advertise it close to its something that we should applaud???

I guess being discrete and have any sense of morality is not what is expected with the Spears inherited or anyone in Hollywood for that thing.
Her being pregnant might be see as a bad emblem, but i do not think this is celebration.
They shouldn't be able to fire somebody base on their appearence.
Probably, but I am not sure. I wonder what it says surrounded by her contract.
No, its just equal as it would be illeagal to fire and adult self pregnant.
its illeagal that the father is 19... i think.
yeds it would. SHES PREGNANT???!!?1?!?!??!?AHAHAHAHAHAH~!!!!... WHITH WHO????
shes 16 shes still a kid appropriate job elder sis Brit. I dont think she should be fired, but if the father is elder, stachatory rape, then thats another story..
Actually i don't regard as it's illegal I infer they can, but I also think they own to have another defence besides just that.
Most possible she signed a morality contract or something similar before working near Nick - as much as I agree that a girl/woman should not ever be fired based on pregnancy, this is different. Little girls and boys keep watch on Nick and she is a role model.
not necessarily.there are recurrently clauses in stars contracts stating that they cannot smear their reputations b/c of how that might affect the show. Not to mention, this is a kids show...what are the parents of kids watching supposed to make clear to their children about little zoey getting a big belly..not fitting for Nickelodian at all.
That would adjectives depend on her contract. It's not like she have a normal full time position. She has a contract next to the network. Whenever that contract expires, the make friends can simply decide not to renew it.

Either instrument, the Spears family have yet another aim to be ashamed...
Yes, she could be fired. Most likely for a contract defilement. She could not bring a lawsuit against them because of the contract with Nickleodeon. Part of a show business contract repeatedly stipulates a certain code of behavior or emblem, especially when one is a role model for other children.

I DO think Jamie Lynn Spears should be fired. She made a impossible decision and near are many girls who looked up to her, and unfortunatly her sister. Would you want YOUR daughter looking up to girls similar to that? I think not.
She should be fired base on her breach of contract. She is unable to make the role that they hired her for. Her character is not a pregnant unwed teen.

It's a impeccably legal point to let her budge.
May be a moot question -
if the advertisers adjectives bail out because of a perceived image problem...
Yes, it would be immoral for them to fire her, unless there be some clause in her contract that she have broken by getting pregnant. But most likely she will know how to keep her brief.
Ahh, heck YES!!. Now let's put this into perspective. Where do you think these Spears girls academic their high moral values and line traditions? If you don't think that the second piece this girl though of was "Gee, how much could I brand on this if they fire me? you have never dated a Southern bimbette... I enjoy no doubt she is claiming she did no know how this could crop up. Don't get me wrong the South is loaded beside some of the most beautiful and brightest girls contained by the country, (just not them Spears girlz). I certainly don't remember ever audible range Britney or Jamie mention where they might resembling to attend college. Let's just hope Nickleodeon is smart plenty to sever ties with this girl in the past her boyfriend does. This is a bad situation explicitly only going to gain worse for this guy... And if you want to know what Jamie Lynn will be like as a mother Just look at Britney. Remember, the apple does not fall down far from the tree. This pair have certainly turned out to be some of the finest role models for childlike girls I can remember since... Oh, perhaps Anna Nichole.

Demographics... a legal form of segregation?

I simply want to hear intelligent peoples' opinions on this concern. I want to write an article labeling the pros and cons of the effects of demographics and submit it to the American Civil Liberties Union for review. My stand is that demographics say how much percentage of spot on races, sex, etc. live and work. They also pass statistics on who responds to certain products. Is this not a form of nouns? If we are all equal, next why do we label who lives where on earth, works where, and eat what?
Please state whether you agree or oppose contained by your answer. Agreeance will not necessarily win you best answer, but the most well composed argument will... regardless of stance.
Answers: Demographics can be misused.

For an example, in that was an instance where on earth a business studied demographics to determine where to place its businesses surrounded by order to avoid the black population.

But, for the most subdivision, demographics can be a marketing tool, as well as a civic planning tool. In these instances, tribal and religious background play a really minor role.

An example of a positive use of demographics would be determining where a great deal of elderly people lived within order to most advantageously place a senior diversion centre.

Now, to win to your mention of equality. People should have the OPPORTUNITY to be equal, but should not be FORCED to be equal. This mode that I am free to use certain products that you do not.

In this passageway, who eats what, who works where on earth, who drives what kind of auto, are adjectives demographics that have nought to do with equality. These are chosen behavours on the factor of each individual base on their tastes.

Discrimination occur when one treats another differently due to race, religion, ethnicity, disability, and even lately sexual situation.
segregation is forced. demographics is an observation.

Equality have nothing to do near preferences, so if a company can appeal to its target market through the use of demographics it not with the sole purpose increases their chances of selling their product, but it deliver the products needed to the people who obligation them.

From a government perspective, it is the best method to allocate services etc. Why give a million dollar village a free community clinic next door, when across town their is a poor nouns which are more likely to use it and necessitate it?
Demographics is nothing more than studying where on earth people live and their conduct. That doesn't do anything to segregate people. It's a study of what is. It endorses no hard to please belief or philosophy. It can't discriminate.
The ACLU uses this data to determine where on earth they have the best kismet to get favorable decision on lawsuits. They file where on earth the local population and judiciary has a brand up that would be sympathetic to their arguments. By filing contained by a Federal court that is more possible to rule in their favor they can be in somebody`s space their agenda. If just one district sides near them it becomes the imperative of the land until the overnight case can be overturned. Judicial activism bypasses the voters and is how the ACLU can impose the will of the few on the various.
Demographics are a way of assembly information on a group of people contained by order to provide them something. Segregation is racism by a governing body. Different strokes for different folks, right? It would be adjectives to sell snow cones surrounded by Antarctica... I believe that there is no other instrument to discover who wants a product than assembly information on who wants, what, when, where on earth and why. I firmly disagree until you can find an ethical way around this. An interesting thought though, KFC does not merely sell to African-Americans nor does Mcdonalds supply to just the Scottish.
I totally agree beside you there, and I've be thinking about that lately. I believe that the undamaged concept of "race" is racist. Ancient societies never separated people base on physical differences, so why do we? It shocks me when the news will report on the polls of how "black people" respond to abiding issues, because I feel that this is segregation and it promotes racism. I believe general public are people, no business what they look like, and near are no differences between us. I strongly reject the idea of "race". I get the message separating people base on nationality, cultural differences, femininity, religious beliefs... I don't necessarily agree with separating ethnic group based on these things, but I can read between the lines it. Separating people by see, I can't understand that at adjectives.
I disagree because you have a misunderstanding between statistics and a officially recognized form of discrimination. Demographic is a statistical style to study the human pattern contained by a particular nouns of interest. It is useful within determining what type of service or resources should be allocated to that area.

The potential misuse comes within the form of allocation. It is open for interpretation and if someone's intent is to deprive a group of culture their rightful resources, then it may be nouns. Beware that discrimination applies to a peter out list of group such as see, age, sex etc. You are not protected outside of that list.

So demographic itself is not discriminatory, it is the misuse of it that will organize to discrimination. If demographic is simply s statistical tool, then it cannot be a "endorsed form of segregation."

More Questions and Answers:
[999] - [2005] - [361] - [808] - [1020] - [133] - [1933] - [2283] - [2555] - [963] - [956] - [892] - [326] - [653] - [42] - [1055] - [1719] - [2236] - [9] - [822]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: