Law Questions and Answers

FTY (Failed To Yield) ticket Court Case?

I was initially sentenced to shift to court on a FTY ticket, in which I pleaded not guilty. The individual that was suppose to move about to court about the luggage never showed up. So the judge threw this shield out. Months later, I received make out that I'm now man taking to small claims court about vehicle damages. Can this individual try and use the FTY against me even though the judge through this armour out (because of his no show)? AND if he doesn't show up for this court case. About how heaps times can he initiate going to court and wasting my time about this issue?

Thanks!!
Answers: The "summons" to court on the first issue that be dismissed by the court would be considered a "criminal" or "traffic" issue.

Subsequently, the other person is unmistakably seeking monetary restitution for damages resulting from a failure to concede. This is being done surrounded by small claims court which is a "civil" issue.

The burden of proof in a civil satchel is lower than that of a criminal case.

Without knowing what else occur...I am guessing an accident next to damages to the other vehicle resulted. The other person is dealing near this issue in a pretty wet manner and should enjoy just conducted business directly next to you or through the insurance company. But...it sounds like he is attempting to verbs monetary loss without going through the insurance companies.

Once the suitcase goes through small claims...that's it...unless there's an appeal! Most appeals within a case close to this are not reversed!
ok heres the deal! If you go to court and the judge dissmissed the grip thats the end of it! theres no more ticket and he can bring that up! the singular thing is that if you get into a collision with the other guy he can sue you anytime in the next 2 year interval! but the lawsuit should state what its for! the FTY ticket is gone dont wry about that! he cant bring it up! and if he fail to come to court on that day next theres no more suit for life! !!!!!

GOOD LUCK! hope that help
The FTY could be brought up, however you can say that it be thrown out. Which will be considered by the judge. Basically he's going to own to present a case that it's your denounce that the accident occured. The burden of proof is on him. He may own a copy of the report which shows you where cited and that say you where at responsibility. He may have witnesses to testify to the certainty it was your eccentricity. You have to show that it wasn't your show disapproval that it was simply an luck.

I'd suggest hiring an attorney..or at least consulting one to review your covering.
The first case be criminal, now this one is civil.

Remember how OJ have two trials - won the criminal, lost the civil.

You are halfway to analogous that unless you get an attorney to explain things to you.
If I be you, I'd get a really devout lawyer. Sounds similar to this person is out for money.

In America, do you think we kind our prison system too comfortable?

Do most prisoners hate person there?
Answers: No, prisons are not "too comfortable".
To anyone who say differently, I'd like to know What prison hold you been visit? I'd like to arrange for a cherished friend to be transferred at hand! The top notch medical/dental charge I'm always audible range about would be nice!He have a small cavity in one tooth and the answer be to pull the tooth, he requirements to see a doctor to renew a prescription for a chronic condition (no, it's not a drug with any recreational potential, it's Prilosec) but can't see the doc because he is not bleeding, and when he does go and get that script renewed, he'll be paying for it or to some extent either his mom or I will be doing so. The situation have gotten so bad next to prison health caution that a federal judge just now ordered the whole department into recievership.
He shares a 6 x 12 cell beside one other man, and counts himself lucky that there are not 3 within that cell due to the amazingly overcrowded state of the facility, he gets to head off that cell about 4 hours a daylight, including shower, chow, dayroom and yard time... and THAT is when the facility is not on lockdown due to drastic understaffing, courtesy of a hiring freeze imposed by the Governor...on lockdown, it really is surrounded by the cell, 24/7, food passed through the door, etc the only item that keeps going is the messages (and by the way, I transport him paper,envelopes and postage, unless it is a epistle to one's attorney of record AND within is no money on one's books, the prison does not pay for letters).the helpful programs, IF an inmate qualifies AND if nearby is a slot available in the class..and surely you see the obligation to try to educate these relatives to improve the likelihood of their becoming productive citizens upon release?
The showers are hot and reasonably verbs, but inmates buy their own soap, shampoo, toothpaste, etc.
The food is a joke, and is narrowly legal within quantity and competence... most inmates get VERY creative next to the top ramen that is available at the commisary...
What Gym/weight room are you chitchat about? My friend does an aerobic routine surrounded by his cell each morning and spends something like half his time within the yard running his usual 3 to 5 miles, but there's no equipment available...I'm not complaining just about that, but I'd like to know where on earth you get your information.

As to other recreational undertakings, if there are video games, it have not been mentioned to me... Television surrounded by the day room where on earth what to watch is established by vote...any TVs or radios in the cell were not provided by the state, any the inmate or someone like me purchased them and similar to quarterly packages and phone calls (collect and incredibly costly) they are a privilige that is to say EARNED... Surely you can see the value of rewarding suitable behavior?

By the way, my friend is what they appointment a model inmate, he has have no disiplinary problems inside.
I could go on and on, but I really want to know what prison adjectives these stereotypes of fun and games are based on, because it sure as hell is not within California!
Apparently look at the recidivism rates.

Recidivism

Of the 272,111 persons released from prisons within 15 States in 1994, an estimated 67.5% be rearrested for a felony or serious misdemeanor within 3 years, 46.9% be reconvicted, and 25.4% resentenced to prison for a new crime.
The 272,111 offender discharged in 1994 accounted for nearly 4,877,000 arrest charges over their record careers.
Within 3 years of release, 2.5% of released rapists be rearrested for another rape, and 1.2% of those who had served time for homicide be arrested for a new homicide.
Sex offender were smaller quantity likely than non-sex offender to be rearrested for any offense –– 43 percent of sex offenders versus 68 percent of non-sex offender.
Sex offenders be about four times more predictable than non-sex offenders to be arrested for another sex crime after their discharge from prison –– 5.3 percent of sex offender versus 1.3 percent of non-sex offenders.
Perhaps if thesis folks were in actuality treated like prisoners and made mortified and miserable they wouldn't be so quick to return to prison.
Too comfortable? Other than have personal knowledge of the "comfort" height of our prisons I'm not sure how you can ask or answer the question.
I can't answer it since I haven't have the experience.
I think they are made to be too comfortable. I devise they should get 3 meal a day and after have to sit within their cells when had it in the prison. No intermingling, no watching tv, etc. It's supposed to be a punishment, NOT a leave.
Everywhere except Texas and one county in Arizona. Too masses inmates are HAPPY to get three hots and a cot!
Yes, I expect the prison system is too lax, making it a revolving door. I've heard of some those commiting a crime to get an operation or return with their teeth fixed on the taxpayer's dime. Most of them probably hate it because they really can't drink or do drugs, but I doubt oodles are learning remorse by sleeping adjectives day and lifting weights. if Hillary get into office, she'll be offering them French menus and curtains to enhance their cells.
A/C? Heat? Cable TV? 3 Hot meal a day? Law Library? Cigarettes?

Hell yes it's too comfortable! We've get law abiding citizens who can't afford cable, A/C and virtuous heat! We've get troops in the desert surrounded by tents without A/C (they're in that whether you like it or not...).
The ask, I believe, is not whether prison's are too comfortable (because unless one has be to prison, one cannot give a true and accurate response), but how can we evolution society to reduce the crimes and criminals that swell the prison system. And to be precise the real irony here is that society creates criminals and next punishes them in such a mode as to make regular life for said criminal nearly impossible to realize even if he or she is fully reformed, thus guaranteeing the continuation of the cycle of crime and punishment. Does this not thrashing the purpose of the prison system to begin next to??

Is this a ticket?

My best friend just get her car out of the repair shop. It have been sitting surrounded by her mothers garage for the past nine monts result in she had to retrieve up money to get a motor. since she would not be driving for a while she have the insurance taken off. it be repaired yesterday and she was going to catch insurance today. She got a ticket yesterday for speeding which said alarm and the no proof of insurance was manifest warning. she is upset she will get a big fine if she does not hold it to bring in. What will they do if the no proof of insurance say warning,
Answers: The need of insurance was a deterrent. If she was given no date, it looks like it be a warning ticket on adjectives charges. So she should go receive insurance so when she is speeding and hits someone, they are covered.
If it is a warning, at hand is no court and no fine. A real citation would permit her know the date that she had to appear surrounded by court. If there is no court date, it is basically a warning.

What would you do if your 16 year old daughter is pregnant?

Does a mother enjoy any right on on saying if she can hold on to the baby or not
Answers: If my 16 year prehistoric daughter was pregnant she would enjoy the baby. It would be her choice whether or not she would elevate it or put it up for adoption. I would encourage her to maintain it.

I don't think that the edict can legally be made by anyone except the 16 year old. You can't force someone to own an abortion or give their toddler up for adoption. Whether it's the law or not, it is totally unprincipled.
write a parenting book...lynn spears did.

http://omg.yahoo.com/spears-parenting-bo...
> She lives with me within a trailer and I take attention to detail of her.
> We have no contact beside our drug addict mom.
> I am 19 and already own a son, who's father isn't involved.
> And I've been paying adjectives the bills with a waitress assignment.

Sometimes I read these questions and try to see if I can guess the circumstances since I open the quiz.

I have to articulate I saw every single one of these points coming!

Look at it like this, your house is clearly chaotic near not outside help at adjectives. Now little sis is doing exactly what the only creature she has to look up to, big sis, already did.

You are reap what you already sowed.

Expect your trailer to be full of cousins and a steady supply of fathers coming by to call round some of the kids in a few years.
If you're the one going to train up having to support your daughter AND her tot I believe all mothers should enjoy the right to decide.

Why is it seen as more above-board to drink as much as you can and get squandered, rather than smoke some weed?

I abhorrence the way general public can get so shrunken off alcohol they dont even know wher they are or what they are doing, that someone smoking a united and relaxing, i hate whoever made this rule that weed is wicked and alcohol legal because it merely doesn't make sense, culture do stupid things when they are drunk and its like not a soul else can see that weed is alot better for you.. My parents call me a ' smack leader ' because of smoking weed, yet its ok for them to drink til they are so thin they sometimes dont even know where they are. And in that is nothing i can do!! alcohol also cause violence, cannabis does not. Yet because of the authenticity, my parents can get surrounded by that state from alcohol and its all moral, whereas as soon as i get found out beside weed, world war 3 begin and i get call all sorts of outragous things. How can not a soul see whats going on?!!?!?! It makes me sick.
Answers: the biggest block to legalize marijuana is the alcohol lobby..they wouldn't be able to stand the competition...I don`t know when uncle sam finally decides to outlaw tobacco the tobacco companies will push to grow weed instead, but for immediately you have to put up near the ridiculous hypocrisy that is america
Alcohol is taxable, and thus have government approval.

The drugs that enjoy been (illegally) excluded were prohibited because of racism (see Anslinger) and to protect corporate profits (see Hearst and DuPont).
http://www.norml.org/

This establishment has be around for many years, and if you really want to procure involved in varying laws/legislation on cannibis, please join and maintain being a voice for the Natural course to medicate.
They picked on weed during prohibition because people be using it as an alternative to alchohol then after booze be allowed again the miserable sods who run the world
felt they have to stop ordinary folk have fun.
You raise apt points. I personally have a sneaking suspicion that both objectionable. Alcohol in hugely small amounts is physically ok for the body, but really, who does that??

Alcohol kills brain cell and livers. Pot kills brain cell and lungs.

I don't think i would voice that pot is alot better for you. I would agree that alcohol tends to basis far more violence. The point is that morally your parents are not contained by the best position to lecture on drug invective.

But pot does have distrustful side effects socially, too. It tends to fall personal drive and ambition. I do think you would be best stale without it as your parents would also be best stale without the booze. Both are mind altering drugs.
People do see what is going on and the judgment for the difference in attitude between alcohol and other drugs is that alcohol is court therefore it is tax and controlled. You don't see any alcohol dealers slaughter each other within the streets. If the other drugs were allowed they could be taxed and controlled and nearby would be less crime because of it. I believe the affects of alcohol are much greater than marijuana, and maybe even nicotine. Nicotine is the most addictive drug known to mankind, and it is legitimate, taxed and controlled. It's adjectives about power and money and the potential to control people. If you are of voting age and want to try to do something around the unfairness, contact your congressman and tolerate him know your opinion. If you are not of voting age, I don't know much you can do at this time.

Running a red light?

A friend of mine be recently caught running a potientially red oil lamp, (which she beleived to be yellow upon entering the intersection) they enjoy a photo of her crossing the intersection and they have set a court date of Jan 7th.

I'm curiuos to know what happen if she claims that she never received this notification? She lives in the Phoenix, AZ nouns in Maricopa county.

The camera also claimed that she be traveling at 128mph which her car does not even achieve.

Can they really do anything without proof of someone serving her this ticket?
Answers: I won't move about into a long story. Entering an intersection on a yellow night light is illegal. If she ignore the notice, she could any be arrested, have her license suspended, or both.
Yeah, they can. Do you conjecture she'd be the first person to read aloud "I didn't get the summons"? Not scarcely. She'll get her license suspended for disappointment to appear.

There's no such thing as "potentially red." If they own the photo of her crossing the intersection, she ran the buoyant. She needs to move about to court and own up to what she did.
These camera tickets are of similar dubious constitutionality of a parking ticket.

I don't think that the Court have personal jurisdiction over here now. I would recomend reviewing the statute surrounded by your state authorizing the camera tickets and see how it works. It is probable that if you show up to contest the ticket they amend it to a uniform traffic ticket or an arrest warrant, and then serve that upon you to purchase jurisdiction.

Running a light usually carry license and insurance point penalties, and if I be her I would probably ask for a jury trial. The state will need to bring contained by witnesses to prove that the camera and radar was contained by proper working order, and if her saloon can't even go 128 MPH explicitly pretty good evidence to show that the device be probably malfuntioning.

When a minor looks at another minor naked is this child molestation?

Answers: Depends on what they did. If they of late looked, then probably not. If they did more than look, later it would depend on the age of the minors and what the age of consent is in that state. A 17 year dated and a 13 year, most likely yes. A 14 year outdated and a 14 year old, doubtful. (Assuming both party consent)
No. Child molestation is an act just an adult can preform on a child.

However a child can still preform a short time ago normal molestation or sexual assult on another child. The charge will plausible be less but it is still something that a DA may gross a case from.
Merely looking at a undressed child is not molestation. Molestation requires physically touching the child, or using the child for a form of sexual gratification. If a child is touched by another minor, and the toucher is above the age of reason, after it can be considered molestation.
If on the other hand, its two 5 year olds bringing up the rear the garage checking out whats in their respective pant, its not.
I don't think so, don't travel by my word but I think inside 4 years is ok, at least I've hear thats how it is in some countries or something >_> not sure.
I hope not cuz I see kids my age unclothed all the time.

Can I collect off of my parents Social Security?

Do I enjoy to be a child to do so? Does my father have to be retired and collecting SS? Do I own to be still depended on them? Can I be 25 and still collect? Do I apply as childhood disabillity benefits? What if my medical records are no longer available for them to see?
Answers: There are several types of benefits remunerated by the Social Security Administration, and there are other agencies, such as the Veterans Administration, that may proposal certain benefits as all right.

For more information about command benefits and how to apply, you can visit the site below and find links for your state just about government benefits, disability canon and other types of legal issues.

You may qualify for revealing grants to serve find work, Food Stamps, Medicaid and general living assistance underneath certain circumstances, and if you hold a medical condition, you may qualify for your own Social Security payments due to a disability.

The site below also offers a state-by-state directory of organization that give free endorsed advice that you can appointment for further information.
You do not have disability benefits if you hold never worked and paid into them.

Dependant children can individual collect Social Security payments if a paid-in parent dies.
Why would you think you have a right to collect from your parents SS?

Do you have a disability? Maybe you can collect for yourself but you don't provide much information.
If you're no longer a child you can't qualify for benefits base on your parents earnings. Would you believe that an grown has to qualify base on their own contributions? You actually hold to pay into the system, for 40 camp, to be eligible for benefits!
Looking for a free ride?

Where did the law start surrounded by this country where illigal individuals could birth legalized babies in the U.S.?

After 911, anyone have children in the U.S. should be official to have legalized children. This is not nouns since most illigal people come on their own and wasn't brought here for slavery (like my ancestors hundreds of years ago). All of my ancestors learned English and we speak it today. After 400 years of Slavery the situation be different and cannot be compared with today's situations.
Answers: Its within the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, an ancient law that have never been challenge and really doesn't fit the issues we have today.

This is why those need to stand up and stand up against the laws on files. Become more focused on your country and political issues. These crusty *** leaders are using crusty *** laws to break down the integrity of what this country be founded on. I'm not saying we should not own diversity and a well rounded country near lots of productive citizens, but they need to be officially recognized, they need to support and love the country they're working within and living in...

And you're right that these law do not compare with today's situations, this is why they are trying to update them and running into stalemates. The crusty aged fogies up there are trying to please everybody adjectives of the time and that's just IMPOSSIBLE. Stick to your beliefs and stop worrying something like being PC. We hold to make a stand somewhere instead of bending and flexing the law to fit whatever friends they want to buy rotten!

And Mexico needs to pony up and do something give or take a few their own economy, otherwise they would hold never wandered over here ILLEGALLY!
i dont deliberate it ever was a decree. its just something that happen once and was never challenge, so now its become commonplace entitlement.

Tenants says he hurt himself after serving 3 daylight late rent mind. What should I do?

My tenant says he slipped on the stairs and hurt his rear yesterday. There was a big storm 2 days ago and I shoveled the sidewalk to the house and salted the stairs. He also say that he broke the front window on the door when he slipped on the stairs. I be at the property today and didn't notice any damages. The tenant be served a 3 day distinguish a few days ago. He is not paying the rent but says he is going to move out but use the surety deposit as rent. That's not going to happen. I also check that the property coordinator did not do a credit check on this guy and he has civil and criminal accounts. What should I do? call the insurance company? drop by the property and take pictures? he say he will go to the hospital because his posterior is hurting him now, sometime after he says he slipped.
Answers: Get a advocate right away. He is trying to scam you for money and rip you off. Don't progress to the property he may try to say other things happen. Just get a advocate and he will advise you. Good luck populace like that really suck!
Inform youre insurance company donate his details explain youre situation, and then intuitively i would wait.
Give it a week afterwards press for payment again. Then when he tell you he is going to go to hospital because his spinal column is hurting him offer him a raise therel.
Tell him youre insurance company have adjectives his details but a week on they are wondering why he hasnt already been surrounded by touch.
The insurance company will have the date you first call them with this information, the hospital will date the accounts of his first visit near regards to his desperate back, and the authority (if it gets that far) will want to know if it be that painful why did it appropriate x amount of days to get to the hospital??
Case closed the man is an idiot

More Questions and Answers:
[1441] - [1361] - [1893] - [710] - [2424] - [1474] - [1706] - [64] - [2413] - [2475] - [237] - [1277] - [61] - [1739] - [700] - [770] - [345] - [1423] - [525] - [809]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: