Law Questions and Answers

Is it legal to take a BB gun?

I'm 17 and I live in New York State, is it decriminalized to carry a CO2 powered BB gun on me for protection? Is it officially recognized to carry it anywhere contained by my car? I know you hold to be 18 to buy one, but you only own to be 16 to use one. I want to know what the laws for it are within New York. Its not a real firearm next to gun powder bullets, just a C02 powered BB gun
Answers: You are wanting to convey it for all the wrong reason my friend. It will not protect you, in reality, it will probably get you shot! A existing thug will laugh at you pulling a BB gun for protection and a cop will probably shoot you, no a cop WILL shoot you and afterwards file a report that you be armed.
If it is protection you are looking for, join a boxing club or revise self-defense, or better yet, don't get hold of yourself into a situation where you consistency threatened.
good luck...

okay, we are retards, i'll simply add this note----
don't be such somewhat ***** and toughen up. when i was your age i used my fists, and still do, i don't obligation no gun to make me get the impression like a man, hit the gym, punk
the problem next to your age group today is they all want guns to variety them feel tough, hoist some weights, learn how to row *****
You can buy one in NYS when you are 16, unless they enjoy changed the law contained by the past 5 years. You can transport it, it's not considered a firearm. It may be considered a concealed weapon if you have it unobserved in your belt. And you can catch into serious trouble using it to threaten somebody.

I STRONGLY reccomend not ever using it for protection. You're not going to hurt anybody with it. It's not going to make available you any kind of protection. Trust me, i've be shot with one, bee stings hurt more. It's only going to put you in a hazardous situation. What happens when you verbs it and the other person pulls thier .44 magnum and shoots your ***. They're not even going to receive into trouble if they have a convey permit, because you purely gave them a reasonable reason to protect themselfs.

Edit:
To answer your examine, no, keeping it in your glove box is not informal. Using it WILL get you into trouble. If somebody starts a fracas and you shoot them with it, you will most definately capture an assult charge. Using it to intimidate somebody is also illegal.

Also, don't over estimate it's power. Every shot will be slightly weaker than the finishing because the CO2 cartridge looses pressure. The most it will do is effect a welt contained by the skin, it's not going to go into somebody.
NYS OR NYC ?

make a difference...no BB guns in the City.
see grip law knit.
Bigger Q is why risk pis_sing someone off next to a BB gun ?
just because you tote a BB gun doesn't be a sign of someone else won't have a REAL gun.
-----------------------------------

So you don't approaching our opinions ? tough - because they emulate what people believe what would/will crop up to you if you continue this undertaking. tired of opinions, and all the same no comment on the case decree link ?
hmm hey im not too sure but from what I hear you won't be in trouble for have one as long as it's not loaded. but if you were caught beside one and it's loaded nothin will happen to you adjectives they will do is hold your parents resposible lol.

Should a government agency be established to monitor adjectives internet activities inwardly the United States?

I need facts more than opinion about this question...
Answers: There already is one, but you didn't hear that from me.
No, we don't need big brother watching our every moves.

Jazzy
According to Frontline, the CIA already have black rooms setup at the major internet hubs to monitor adjectives internet activity.

FYI, the debate next to the internet monitoring vs. the Constitution has not be performed nonetheless. Until the gov't defines privacy beside the internet, the gov't can monitor it.
"Should" is a call for opinion, not facts. Maybe you should re-phrase the question.

I don't know give or take a few you, but I don't like the theory of being monitored. Think of the sizeable bureaucracy that would be required for this. Think of all the relations sitting in cubicles we would hold to pay to in recent times to read Y!A posts let alone the rest of the internet!
if you dance to the google headquarters, they have a big monitor that lights up every single computer that's online at that moment and can access where on earth they have be surfing.

i think if you're a sex wrongdoer you should have to afford your I.P. address so that authorities can watch where on earth you've been.
what's to vote there aren't already one already i could type these words and they would already be onto you
such as : bomb, terrorist, so on and so on,

whats to stop some nerdy brain surrounded by America designing a computer program to do this, if you imagine a total space of a deed word document such as Microsoft word is about
25 kbytes, here are 1,000,000 kbytes in a gigabyte so the power of some supercomputers could scan the trellis hourly.

just a short time thought, why are there so masses satellites in the orbit of the land and what are they all in attendance for,
No. It is unConstitutional.

Power of attorney form?

Can this form be signed by a notary public or it has to be an attorney?
Answers: Depends on where on earth you live and how it will be used. Some states require a POA be drawn up by an atty; some allow a "form" poa to be used. Pretty much all require a notarized signature to be valid
The form can be signed by a notary public.

This is not right.. job cross-examine?

why is it when were working at a place and we are more or less to quit because of a new career, the proper way to do it is by giving ur company a 2 weeks identify that u will be quiting therefore they could look for someone to replace you.. but why can't companies to duplicate to the employees. if a company is goin to fire someone why cant they furnish them a 2 week notice, so that soul could look for a new mission within those 2 weeks. companies immediately a days just fire you and ur stuck near all these bills but no situation.. if we give companies the respect of a 2 week identify, shouldnt companies to the same for team.. what do you think.
Answers: If a company lays you rotten it should give you discern however, if you're fiered for gross misconduct they wont want you on their premises for obvious reason. It's not fair but that's the style it goes.
Most right companies for professional jobs fire minus warning so that you cannot wound the company or screw anything up on purpose.

Those type of companies usually propose a several package.

Now if you are working at some lower closing job, they don't.
Double standard, you can quit tomorrow if you want, it only puts a bad tang in your former employer mouth.

The reaosn for the 2 weeks is so the company CAN find a replacement. IF they fire you, they don't care something like replacing you they just want you gone, and near is the double standard.
Because an employee who know he's about to be fired is possible to sabotage current projects, steal from the company or worse.

Instead, it is typical for companies to donate severance packages - that is, verbs paying salary for a few weeks so the individual can look for a new profession without going broke.
Good point...
It depends upon the charge you have and your relationship next to your boss. Some places actually do.

Good luck
Star for you
this is a righteous question.
the company is exposed if it no longer have your loyalty.
someone who knows they will be agree to go contained by two weeks is a danger to the company.
conceivably a company could be required to pay the member of staff for two weeks of work instead.
If a company is firing you, they've probably got flawless reason and a register of all the times they've counseled you more or less your deficiencies. If you didn't see it coming and prepared yourself, that's your own bad habit. However, if they have never told you a defence for your firing or they don't have fair proof, they leave themselves open out for a lawsuit.

On a separate topic, companies can and have laid culture off minus notice and I don't conjecture that's fair. (Though again, habitually you can see it coming far in credit, even if they didn't officially report you.)
Interesting point.

Not sure why this is. Maybe they're afraid the person will "walk postal" and shoot the place up. It's happened over and over again, whether they be fired on the spot or not. Or if a person have notice of termination, they could wreck havoc on computer files, other documentation, divulge priviledged info to competitors, etc. But from a strictly human aspect, I agree beside you. Unless of course, the those behavior/performance/actions is a direct threat to the safety and well-being of others.
If you don't ever want to use them for a mention, there's nothing truism you have to pass them any notice.

To administer notice is to be courteous.

Companies or team usually give no catch sight of when terminating or quitting when relations be less than amiable.
> the proper route to do it is by giving ur company a 2 weeks notice that u will be quiting thus they could look for someone to replace you..

That is a courtesy, not a requirement.

> but why can't companies to the same to the workforce. if a company is goin to fire someone why cant they give them a 2 week interest

Often they do. Sometimes yo might get as much as a year's admonitory.

sometimes they will give you a severance pack even if you are let travel immediately.

People commonly don't want those who have quit or be let walk to stick around for many job because they are unmotivated to do their best, and in reality may be motivated to harm the business.
There are no law covering the termination of employees unless the termination is due to nouns.

You are not required to give 2 week spot, they are not required to give you discern. They are not required to give you severance reimburse.

While it is a courtesy to give 2 week spot, it is not mandatory.

Most companies don't want you hanging around for 2 weeks probably stealing information or equipment from the company or soliciting clients away from them. Hence, they usually just put in the picture you to leave.

Why is death cost not culpable homicide amounting to murder.?

There are numerous instances,when law enforcement agencies, have failed to come to the aid of one,who sufferred horrific injustice at the hands of the powerful and influential.And within defence,when the target was constrained to deliver even-handedness himself,the very directive proclaims him/her a murderer and awards death cost.Does it not tantamount to murder ? Whose law is it anyway ? What right have law to enforce "so call justice" when the victim himself be not heard ? Please be commonsensical and offer your view.
Answers: It happens adjectives the time, the ones who have the power craft the law ( sometimes an undue law ) but we can't do anything unless we punch-up for what we believe is right and just... Due process of regulation was not exercised as you mentioned the sufferer was not hear which is really sad but contained by this world where injustice prevail, it can not be help unless one and if only everyone do something roughly speaking it..
I can barely clear out what your talking roughly. I know of no instances where someone kill someone in self defense and get sentenced to death.
The ruling is the law made by the ancestors. You elect a legislature and they enact laws. If you don't resembling the laws, vote contained by someone new.
It's a really good sound out though many empire who support the death cost would not buy your argument. I personally believe the state should not enjoy the right to execute its own citizens. What the hell if you can't trust the government next to our tax dollars why should you trust them near our lives?

In the eyes of the law an execution is not like peas in a pod as murder, you might see that as a legal fiction because within the end somebody be killed. Supposedly an execution is the collective judgment of a society against a convicted criminal for crimes committed.

People who support the death cost feel assets punishment protects them; and that it is right and just to enjoy murders and rapists put to death. These are also population who believe the government works for them by providing this protection next to the guarantee that justice will be done.
Mr.Know, I will probably answer your press as soon as I become a lawyer. One item is anyway true, penalty disappearance should never find place in Earth and surrounded by mens' good and pure chimney corner. It is the fruit of devil's dreams.

Requirements of the data protection Act?

hey does anyone know what a working fully fledged must do too meet the requiremnets of the information protection act
Answers: BASICALLY PROTECT YOUR DATA ON YOUR COMPUTER BE IT AT WORK OR AT HOME.
A WORKING ADULT IF YOU HOLD DATA ON ANYONE YOU MUST PROTECT YOUR DATA FROM ANY UNAUTHORISED PEOPLE VIEWING IT OR TAKE STEPS TO STOP IT BEING STOLEN.
FOR INFORMATION ON THIS CONTACT HMRC WEB SITE THEY CAN TELL YOU ALL THE PITFALLS OF KEEPING DATA SAFE
The Information Commissioner's website is tremendously useful surrounded by explaining the basic responsibilities for employer. The link is: http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisations.

I could be wrong but.Did the State of Massachusetts broker a side deal beside the Venezualan Govt while?

Romney was Governor? Isn't their senior officer anti USA?
Answers: you are correct sir !
No. The state had no contribution in it. It is a privately funded operation run by Joe Kennedy call Citizens Oil. The agreement was between the private company and Venezuelan organization to provide heat for the poverty stricken associates of Massachusetts.

And, who says Chavez is a criminal? George Bush? HA!!! Like the pot calling the kettle black.

Bush sure doesn't attention about anything except getting control of the middle-east oilfields for himself and his oil-rich buddies.

Should I declare Bankruptcy?

I enjoy 3 accounts with Citi that I owe around 4 dignified each on. First for a time history About 3-4 years ago I went through a company that be supposed to get me out of debt inwardly 3 years. Well one year into it things werent working out. They were not calling the Collection Agents to settle and I be doing the work they were supposed to be compensated for. I was paying them a monthly levy plus a fee for every reason they settled. It got concrete bad. Next entity I know they were one shut down by the FTC for taking everyones money and not settling. I filed a complaint but never get any of my money back. The couple cards they did settle never be marked paidor anything on my credit report.
Ok present dayI am surrounded by fear of paying the wrong entity and my debt never going away. I just received a epistle that a collection agency has brought suit against me because I never responded to the papers I be served in Massachusetts. Thing is I never get served Ive been living contained by Florida for 9 months.
Answers: Bankruptcy will damage your credit even more. My suggestion is to contact your creditors directly and ask them if they would work next to you to clear up your debt. I believe that they will work with you as it is surrounded by their best interest. Because if you declare ruin they get zilch back.

Bankruptcy will also verbs any chance of buying a house, vehicle or any other major purchase for at lowest possible seven years, and then you enjoy to work HARD to get it fund. Not only that, but I believe you enjoy itemize all you assets and foot them over before file. Not to mention more money out of your pocket to pay for the branch; who will want his/her money up front.

Good Luck
I wouldn't unless that is your 'last resort' remedy. Do you make plenty to pay your monthly bills? One of the other things you can do (if you enjoy some cash) is to offer the agencies a small percentage of the match as a settlement. Example, if you owe $4k, offer them $1.5k as a settlement. You should enlighten them the only other selection you have is liquidation. They will usually take something to some extent than risk getting nothing. But, you must obtain that agreement in writing and they must agree to bring a cashiers check. Never give them your sandbank account numbers. And check this site for money admin (Financial Peace) and listen to this guy on the radio.


http://www.daveramsey.com/
I wouldn't.

Under current bankruptcy law, you'll probably not be able to discharge these debts. They'll enjoy you paying the debts under a plan by making payments through the Court, and later you have blown your see on declaring liquidation.

Most cases are declared in the rouse of unpayable medical expenses. What happens contained by two years if, God forbid, you have huge medical bills and can't discharge them contained by bankruptcy.

The best style to take protection of this problem is to make the minimum compensation on all accounts, but the smallest one. On the smallest one, manufacture the biggest payment you can every month. After that one is remunerated off, do matching with the subsequent smallest bill, and so on until all are salaried.

You may have to reorder things base on judgments against you.

You may want to contact the attorney handling that one overnight case and enter into an agreement to pay monthly payments contained by the judgment. That protects you because as long as you build the monthly payments, the Court won't do anything to you.

** Note: This is a general discussion of the subject event of your question and not officially recognized advice. Local law or your particular situation may swing the general rules. For a specific answer to your query you should consult legal counsel next to whom you can discuss all the facts of your satchel. **
If there is a result against you in Massachusetts and you be never served, you should consult with an attorney to see in the region of it being vacate. Do you know where service be allegedly made? Typically lack of service is grounds to vacate, but you requirement to consult an attorney. Don't let anyone explain to you the ball is within the creditor's court. They have a perspicacity until you do something to change that.

Bankruptcy WILL discharge this debt, even beneath the new statute. Contrary to popular believe (especially on yahoo answers), pretty much everything that was dischargeable earlier is STILL dischargeable. So yes, Bankruptcy an resolve this, but it's not necessarily the best decision within your situation if the credit card co wrongly ot a judgment against you. But if it is unlikely you'd return with it vacated, liquidation is probably a wise choice. Please consult a local attorney that specializes within collections and bankruptcy.

Why is information important to form popular will?

Deals beside political science. A statute is merely a minor form of expression of the popular will.
Answers: So, the popular will, if it exists, is just anything it is that most people or adjectives people contained by an area would want. If the administration is passing statutes to 'express' the popular will, first they inevitability to know what the popular will is. Usually, this is at least a moment or two bit difficult for the government. To congregate enough information roughly what people have an idea that, the government have to sponsor polls, conduct surveys, or go to town meeting and talk next to people. So there's sympathetic of a disconnect between the information that's out there (each entity knows what he or she thinks) and the information that affairs of state has access to (the administration only know what a handful of people think). This is definitely a problem for the government if it's trying to express the popular will contained by a statute; the government risks ratification a statute that reflects single some people's views.

What are your thoughts on forced rehab to drug users?

Me and a friend were chitchat about some law, and we came up beside some ideas, they might be dumb but dont flame, purely thoughts. We thought all drugs should be wrong (like they already are) and stiffer, harsher fines and punishments, but not always sentence to prison time.we suggested FORCED rehab for the bad drugs close to meth and so on (I included steroids)

he also said that would work better than jail time, because jail wouldnt fill up and it would sustain sober them, prison is for murderers,rapists and other things, not people who do drugs.my friend also suggested legalize marijuana. Even though it is bad of late like the rest, it doesnt own as much of a damage as meth and the rest of them, so it could stop most general public from doing other stuff. Im not saying put on the market it in stores or anything but also no mass selling of the drugs.that be just an conception.I also thought any prisoners other than rapists murderists etc, should own the chance to do some of their time surrounded by the army and reduced prison time. dumb?
Answers: all drugs should be lawful. The government should put a bet on up semi trailer loads of crack and heroin into the cities and give it away. That approach, no one would enjoy to steal to get the stuff, and most of the users would be departed from overdoses in a situation of weeks or months.

That would solve everything. No more crowding in the jail. No more having to release ferocious criminals because there isn't satisfactory space. Be a heap cheaper surrounded by the long run, believe me.

Except in VERY VERY VERY undercooked cases, forced rehab doesn't work. Jail doesn't work. Parole and probation doesn't work. Intervention doesn't work. All are just components of an ineffective, multi-billion dollar a year willow benefitting shrinks and counselors and probation officers, treatment center staffs and everybody else surrounded by involved the bogus, unscientific scam.

Nobody talks a drunk out of drinking. Nobody conference a junkie out of using. The few that manage to stop do it by and for themselves.
forced rehabilitation never works!!!!!

the first step to repossession is to admit the problem and second to settle on to overcome it!!!!
From what I understand the problem is that rehab isn't that available to homeless, inhabitants, and when it is they throw them out as quickly as possible.

I really dream up there should be drug carrying out tests for welfare recipients...I plan giving someone housing and money is just enable them. That extra money could be used to help those who can be helped or put towards the right variety of help.

**I deliberate jail is cheaper than rehab and thats what it boils down to
Not dumb at adjectives. For rehab to work they say the user has to fashion a personal decision to quit, but it seem to me that if the person is monitored and pee tested capriciously with the threat of detention centre if he relapses, that should have some adjectives of success. And you're right, it would store the taxpayers considerable costs.

As for marijuana, that should depend on objective statistics-- possibly from those Scandinavian countries that hold programs that legalize constant drugs.

But your general belief is absolutely logical-- treat addict as ill those and continue to inflict strict penalties on manufacturer, importers and dealers. The not as much of addicts, the smaller quantity customers for the criminals. It's a shame the legislators we elect have considered the criminalization of drug possession as a political gambit and verbs to mislead the public and waste taxpayers money.
No track! Who do you think supports those rehab places? We, the taxpayers, that's who.

I voice legalize adjectives drugs, tax them, vend them to anyone with the money to buy and present the junkies a place to snort their way to glory or shoot themselves off the planet.

Who care.

Look at all the money we could rescue not fighting "the time of war on drugs" (which doesn't work anyway)...empty out the prisons, put the drug cartel and street gangs out of business and release our decree enforcement agencies to take contemplation of our real problems.

I voice if you want to be a junkie - have at it.

More Questions and Answers:
[1878] - [1052] - [1011] - [350] - [641] - [1525] - [1019] - [405] - [1735] - [1388] - [2557] - [148] - [146] - [607] - [853] - [1065] - [1482] - [740] - [432] - [1475]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: