Law Questions and Answers

Will marijuana ever be legalized in the US?

Answers: yes 4 to 12 years away
Sure, it's already on its approach.

But if it does, what are potheads gonna talk almost then?

"Hey, wanna be in motion smoke pot?" "No, because I'm not an immature large schooler anymore"
Its gotta there is style to many of us immediately.

P.S nice avator name lol ,how did you brand him look high!!!
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?!?!?!?!?!?!? Why are you adjectives saying that it should be legalized??? Drugs will literally CRUSH your go!!!!!!!

And NO, I don't think it will be legalized any time soon.
Let me finish rolling this L, then i'll answer your quiz.

It should be legalized because so many fukin ppl do it, and as long as you are responsible give or take a few it, why the fuk not? Drunk driving kills thousands respectively year and alcohol is legal, that dont cause sense.
as for the crazy one who says durgs crush your go, weed aint a drug. read your bible kid. on the third day of creation the lord brought something like all the herb of the earth and told us to consider them meat (that process your supposed to consume it), drugs can destroy your time but pot is not a drug its a blessing from the lord open a book and tutor yourself before you bring in stupid comments

anyway... yeah i think that it will be legalized sooner or following

No rights read,nor arrest. And im being charged surrounded by court with my starement?

I be questioned by the police and be told i would be arrested unless i gave them a statement. They said adjectives i needed to do was confer them a statement and i could go home. So i wrote the statement , and give it to them then they said i could travel home. About 2 weeks later i go and get a letter from the court proverb i need to appear, and theres 5 charges against me. Can they use my statement against me if i wasent aware of my right? I know that they lone have to read my rights if im arrested. But can them threatening me and tricking me into writing this statement be used within court, I was also beneath the influence of alcohol and marajuana at the time.
Thank you
Answers: of course your statement can be used against you. you wrote it. you should own just sit there, mouth shut.
1. am i anyone charged?
2. no, then im departing. (then can only hold you a infallible amount of time w/o charging you.
3. ask for a lawyer if they wont shut up.
4. never consult, never write, their phones are bugged.

have your bail money organized. wear extra clothes that day so if they arrest you, you can use the clothes for insulation while your sitting in the bull pen beside nothing to do.
You necessitate to talk to a advocate, soon. If you can't hire one, ask the court to appoint one.

Yes, usually they can use your statement against you.

Your lawyer will be capable of investigate, and hold the state to the burden of proof that the statement was rightfully taken.

If you had of late said you wanted to settle to a lawyer first, or own one present during questioning, you predictable would have be released, and not have charges approaching now.
Get a attorney.

They coerced you into a statement.

You can say that you give the statement under duress and that you only wrote it so that they would let you stir, and that it is not true.

Because they were not arresting you they did not own to read you your Miranda rights.

I would certainly not own up to being below the influence of Marijuana, and not alcohol either (if you be driving.)
Well if you were underneath the influence of marijuana and alcohol, it isn't a true confession. But you'd have to allow to being beneath the influence to get it waive.

It also isn't a valid confession if you are under duress

"Specific coercion may be used as a trial defence within criminal cases for acts committed underneath threat of injury. Similarly, one may claim the legal nullity of a contract signed below duress.

In both cases, however, the question arises of whether a "fair person" would have perceived a threat, and react in matching way. Moreover, beneath most modern legal systems disciplinary coercion cannot be claimed as an exculpating circumstance for time of war crimes committed under unlawful directions."

DURESS:

Duress or coercion (as a term of jurisprudence) is a possible officially recognized defense, one of four of the most important evidence defenses

In order for duress to qualify as a defense, four requirements must be met:[1]

Duress occur when a person have been deprived of his free will by ability of a threat of violence or threat to personal choice. A person acting underneath duress might not be held liable for the crimes he has committed. When a entity raises a duress defense, the accuse admits to committing the crime, but typically asserts that his schedule should be excused due to the duress.

A person may also lift up a duress defense when force or violence is used to compel him to enter into a contract, or to discharge one."

I would give an account the judge the statement be signed under duress. Then it will be thrown out because "threat to personal liberty". They cannot put you within jail short charging you, so that was a hallow threat. But you be a fool to believe them, and ultimately it will be your word against theirs.

DO YOU NEED A LAWYER?

Not necessarily, but I don't know what charges you are up against.

If they have no prove bar the statement, claim duress, have it thrown out, and dismiss the charges.

DID YOU COMMIT THE CRIME AND ARE TRYING TO BEAT THE SYSTEM?

Maybe you should plea barter, it's not like you are innocent. If it be your first offense, plead guilty to the alcohol and ask that the marijuana charges be dropped. Usually judges appreciated positive the court time. It worked 100% for my friend. and what's minor consumption or a DUI vs. a Drug Charge.

You should have the opportunity to met near both the prosecution and public defender since the trial. Take advantage of this. Courts hold ZERO sympathy for the legally unacquainted.
Yes, and yes. Cops are trained to lie and trick suspects into relating them what they want to know. Haven't you ever watched a show where on earth they do that to the suspects when they just come within for "questioning"? You could have call a lawyer instead of complying next to their demands.

Last week, my girlfriend was sexually worried at work, how can she decide to report a lawsuit?

A male co-worker made sexual comments and asked if she would enjoy sex with him for money. She told her supervisor and adjectives they did was move him something like 30 to 40 ft down from her current location. Does she have to keep on for it to happen again or what?
Answers: File a complaint near higher-ups in the company first. The lawsuit will be closely of trouble for everyone and you should avoid it if possible.
First, I suggest that she consult her member of staff handbook within order to determine the proper procedure inwardly the company for filing a complaint. It is potential that if she is not satisfied next to her supervisor's response to the complaint, the policy states a higher-up individual that she should contact.

Second, if she has exhausted her option within the company, consequently she should contact the local Equal Employment Opportunity Commission office to profile a complaint. They will contact the employer to notify them of her complaint, and give them a hit and miss to respond, and for the two parties to work out a solution. If the employer does not create a positive solution at that point, she can other file a lawsuit.

I don't recommend jump straight to a law suit because if she have not followed the proper steps within her company's policy, her claim loses greatly of merit. Companies know that they have to be prepared for claims of hounding and discrimination. Therefore, most competent organization will have a procedure within place; she should follow it. It is in the company's best interest to listen to her complaint and resolve it. The supervisor is freshly a terrible supervisor, and could win in like mad of trouble for not resolving the issue.

Why is it legal to publicize a person's criminal dictation?

So I was wondering what the permitted basis is for publicizing a person's criminal transcript. One example of this is putting up billboards that show the faces and name of people next to DUIs. Also, what about that complete thing of showing where on earth 'sexual predators' live? I agree that it's nice to know, but I also would like to know if at hand was a murderer, intruder, or embezzler living in my neighborhood. Why is this trial? Thanks!
Answers: Any crime is open to public transcript, I can even go on e-mail and look at the ones contained by our county on line and it give name, address, and crime. They are provided and located within the court clerks office at the courthouse.=====
Why wouldn't it be? These are crimes against society. Society have a right to display it's transgressors.

As far as I know, the right to privacy does not extend to the right to commit crimes privately.
Paranoia, people are very soon insane, why would you want to know really, I mean consequently you'd be judging folks on their past and they are out of Jail immediately.

Man we are not forgiving of anything anymore.
I don't know really, but I think it might be to promote the creeps into the citizens and make them more feasible to give up in attendance rights so the government can do what they please.

You know, a nice of fear factor..
It's public information, I believe.

Confidential informant?

are they drug tested? and what exactly do they do?
Answers: The police use them to snitch on unsuspecting drug users, or dealers. They can seize into places police cannot because they do use the drugs, the officers cannot use drugs in need risking getting caught.

Police also pay informants, so they own an incentive to lie, to turn surrounded by people who are not involved within crime, and to distract officers from the tangible pushers.

Usually the informant will not be forced to come to trial and testify because the target will take a plea.
Well, it depends. A "C.I." is exactly that: an informant, typically for imperative enforcement, that isn't known as such to the populace they are informing against. Drug informants are usually tested, but again, it depends on the department's rules or the state's regulations. Informants come in oodles flavors, but the acronym "R.I.C.E." (Religious, Impeached, Conscious, Ego) covers the most common reason persons turn "rat" against their former conspirators.

What's a Social Services Advocate?

Could anyone tell me what it is they do? Or anything that involves a casing or something.
Answers: I think that they are the Neo-Nazi warrior that try to tell you than spanking your child is wrong.

They don't deserve to be punished. no consequences for their engagements. There must be a reason they are acting out.

Edit: Notice my sarcasm.
An proponent is someone who speaks for someone who cannot usually a child or a disabled person.

In most of case on Employment Tribunal audible range,,If I have a solicitor, is at hand more possibility to win?

Please advise If you know anything roughly these kind.
Answers: yes, the more representaion you hold the better

Is Vick's punishment too much?

For background, I've never like Michael Vick as a person or as a player.

With that said, I have an idea that the punishment of 23 months in prison for his role contained by dogfighting is just ridiculous! Don't capture me wrong, what he did was dumb and uncalled for, but I am saddened to see such an prominence in our society put upon that.

I focus professional sports leagues own bigger problems with their stars fathering children out of marriage vows, abuse of drugs, rough up of spouses, involvement in material crime rings such as gangs. Why aren't league and law enforcement going after these individuals and making examples of them for real problems that plague our society? Instead, we've get idiots protesting outside the Falcons' headquarters with their poodles demanding rights for Fluffy. Why not protest for peoples' rights?!

I consider we've got our priorities adjectives out of whack. As much as I dislike Vick, I'm sorry to see him be made an example for something so dumb.

What do you think?
Answers: I without doubt agree. I'm not a football guy, so this has positively nothing to do next to liking or not keenness the man. I think in attendance are just closely of better reasons to dislike Vick or a short time ago about anyone else contained by major league sports.

I also find that raise the value of an animal's vivacity above that of a human being, no thing how adorable the animal and disgusting the human, is disturbing at the very most minuscule.
Granted , I'm a big dog lover...
But I wonder if Vicks sentence seems long solely because the courts are too lenient to crimes against race ?
i think it is too short of a punishment. he made money by torturing animals.

i definetly suggest he should be made example of. its animal cruelty!!!

he has more than adequate money, why does he need to product more. he is a sick, sick person!
I agree next to you, but you and I are in the minority. Wait and see...the dog lovers are gonna come after you.

I regard as of dogs as property...albeit, living property...and the owner should be able to train and prize punch-up that animal for profit without the political affairs getting on his back.

Like I said, the infinite majority of people find your statement and this answer repugnant.
Innocent dogs don't find a second chance.

People that name-calling animals, are also people that hold the ability to mishandle women and children.

The punishment is fair. It's something like time we stopped slapping the hands so the criminal can repeat their crimes of animal cruelty.

Dogs (and other animals) need our voice to speak for them. The society have spoken. WE WILL NOT TOLERATE ANIMAL ABUSE.
I don't dream up causing twinge and killing animals is something we should be encouraging.
Its against the tenet, its obvious by the movements he took to hide his involvement that he know it. He choose to ignore the decree, and lets not forget it seem there be some drugs and gambling going on too.
He wasn't dumb, he have a full grown animal killing ground going on. He thought he could go and get away with it. I judge anyone who thinks bloodshed animals is a sport needs some serious serve. Watching dogs rip each other apart is sick.
You can protest for peoples rights and still own time left over for Fluffy, its not mutually exclusive.
The man broke the tenet, he admitted his guilt, hes no different from any other criminal, and he have excellent representation.
If I'm going to feel sorry for anything its the kittens he feed to those dogs to give them a bite for blood.
Maybe he can think around that while hes sitting in secure unit.

BTW the sentence he was given be pretty much in dash with other animal cruelty cases here, he may enjoy a better known heading, but it was a gala sentence.
Well, it was a ruling and he broke it... That's all I agree beside...
I don't agree with adjectives the laws, but I follow them, otherwise I'll travel to jail.

Dogs are kill everyday in shelters. I set a mouse trap concluding night and kill a mouse, does that make me desperate? No, cuz there's no law against it.

I enjoy to believe that it's the lawbreaking that got him surrounded by prison rather than the certainty that he killed dogs... It's far smaller number than killing a entity.
Anyone who tortures & abuses & kill animals who can be pets, & teaches them by abuse them to kill other possible pets, & raise them just to do this to them, is sick & desires to be kept away for a long time. Because if you can do this to an innocent animal, you have the dimensions to do it to humans as well. Study the Jeffery Dahmers overnight case & what he did to animals before he started on humans. They better protect Vick surrounded by the big house. They don't like general public who mess with innocents. Human or animal.
I meditate he is sick, & just because he scholarly how to play a game, make him to more than anyone else.
A thug is a thug. He is a thug with no good opinion or respect for the law. He think his ability to play football and his significant salary exempts him from the rules and law that the rest of us must follow.

I think his sentence is too short.and too much medium coverage was made just about the whole item.

No matter how you dress 'em up, no situation how much money they earn, no matter how frequent cars, homes or boats they own.a thug will always be a thug.

How long should I get?

I be arrested with a soaring amount of class A drugs and 181 in bread. I was never see dealing but was see talking to drug addict. In court I will claim that the drugs were for myself . My barrister think I will get 6 years.
Answers: Few years
You're still lucky within other countries the penalty is DEAD.

Where can I go to check my criminal story?

i have some things on it from fifteen years ago, I would approaching to see what my rap sheet is
Answers: Go to your local police station with I.D. There is a charge also for the report, perchance $20 bucks. Where I'm at it is.
Since you know your own history, this shouldn't be necessary. However, if you suspect that something is planned that you're unaware of (mistake?), next you should use a service such that an employer might use. There are several of these on the Internet. Some are scams, some not.

I've used https://www.4nannies.com/background/inde... to check the framework on someone I was hiring.
You will stipulation an onsite countywide search within any jurisdiction of interest. The industry standard is a seven year search so you will stipulation to add second search years to jump back an extra 8 years. Here is the interconnect: http://www.efindoutthetruth.com/Countywi...

More Questions and Answers:
[2301] - [1249] - [1116] - [708] - [2153] - [254] - [1007] - [767] - [540] - [2425] - [368] - [654] - [144] - [310] - [91] - [1056] - [390] - [1406] - [938] - [1213]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: