Law Questions and Answers

Can I get sued for making profit indirectly using a trademarked cross?

I am a YouTube user and they recently started a program call the partners program. If you sign up, you can net money off of your video.

I want to do this but my username shares the name of a crucial newspaper surrounded by Texas. I want to make money rotten of my videos but I don't want this company to sue me by maxim I am making a profit off of them. I enjoy put disclaimers in my profile that right to be heard that I am not affiliated with them and do not represent them.

So can I bring sued for making money off of video with a username approaching "SanAntonioPress" or "DallasMorningNews" or "NewYorkTimes" ect?

Answers: If your name is possible to cause confusion next to another's trademark (i.e., as to the source of the goods or services you provide), afterwards you may be infringing on that person's trademark rights.

A disclaimer, in and of itself, is not ample. Imagine if I sell "Ron's Pepsi-Cola" brand soda and put a disclaimer that I am not affiliated near PepsiCo. It would be silly if I could get away beside that.

set up a new details.

Have any judges ever be dismissed from the International Court of Justice?

It would be great if you could give a date and the judge's residency.

Answers: "A judge can be dismissed by one and only a unanimous vote of other members of the Court. " And it does not appear that that have ever happened.

What issue is currently taking place involving the ontario ministry of transportation?

what issue is currently adjectives involving the onatio ministry of transportation and the vanity licence approval department

Answers: See the news story below

Cross examination?

for arts school i have this "court case" or trial or doesn`t matter what
on the book to kill a mockingbird
the trial is on the ask is tom robinson a matryr and im on the yes team for some common sense

so im one of the 3 lawyers and i requirement cross examination tips
similar to what are the main/ important question should i ask?

Answers: Cross examination is where on earth you get the opportunity to make clear to the client's story thru your questions. You return with to lead the witness, so if the other side objects remind them that this is cross.

Example: Isn't it true that it be not Tom, buy you who is th matryr? (Aside: what is a matryr?)

An example, say for a crime of Speeding:

Officer, you be parked behind the billboard werent you?
Answer: Yes

And here was profusely of traffic wasn't there?
Answer: Yes

And within were lots vehicles traveling over the posted speed bound, werent there?
Answer: Yes

And near were also plentiful cars traveling within the speed confine weren't there?
Answer: Yes

But you couldn't stop them adjectives could you?
Answer: No

So you stopped the car beside the cute young chick didn't you?
Answer: Yes, ugh, I be a sign of. . .

Even though the radar showed that she wasn't speeding, correct?
Answer: Yes, I mean no

In tangible life, here's how cross nouns works. You extract from your material (in this skin, I guess it's the book) every fact that's favorable to your position that the witness know about.

Then, you simply use your question to confront the witness with those facts.

A honest cross exam question states a favorable fact-- one that the witness cannot deny beside any credibility.

For example:

Question: It's true, isn't it, that you told Officer Smith that you didn't remember what the person looked approaching?

All cross exam questions should be question that have to be anwered yes or no. You should not ask: "What did you speak about Officer Smith?"

On cross examination, you're not trying to bring back information-- you're presenting your case to the jury.

Good luck.

Question for attorney or paralegal only please?

Do you judge that a party representing him/herself within divorce court always get 'shafted'. Do you know of some that have presented their luggage well - and have a very apposite outcome?

Answers: It depends, if the only issue is the termination of the bridal, go on short an attorney.

If the issues include child support, custody, visitation, division of property, and spousal support, if you cannot agree on these things then you should own an attorney.

This would depend on the type of divorce.

I have see many pro se divorces that turned out fine. Usually these are the uncontested ones near no children.

If you have children, or expect doubt from the respondent, then I would strongly suggest hiring an attorney.

They don't acquire "shafted", they just do not hold the needed training and knowledge to suitably represent themselves. And if they are unhappy near the outcome, they only hold themselves to blame. Being pro per and losing does not give them right for an appeal. It is other best just to own an attorney represent you...unless it is a very amicable split near neither party arguing over property, but if near are kids involved, an attorney is needed.

Criminal background checks- federal crimes?

if a personage worked for the DEA would the cases they were involved near show as federal crimal cases on their backround check, showing them vs. the USA.
We ran a check on a possible empoyee and she told us explicitly why it showed up- any truth to that?
I need tangible advice- the state these cases are in will not make a contribution me any info b-cuz I am a civilian. THANKS to anyone who can help!!

Answers: That doesn't nouns quite right to me. My rationale for this is if a police officer is involved contained by a case that go to court, the case wouldn't enjoy his/her name surrounded by the case title, so a DEA agent's entitle wouldn't show up either. Also, if he/she be actually working for the DEA, that vehicle they are an employee of the US parliament, so it doesn't make sense that they'd be involved surrounded by a case against the US system.

Have you called the DEA even so to confirm that this person is or have worked for them? You might want to do that if you haven't already to make sure this personality has even worked for the DEA; that might enlighten you a lot right within.

Was she an employee of the DEA (agent, other) or be she an informant being salaried for her information?

As an agent, no, her name wouldn't show up within the court papers. If she was indicted as a subject of a criminal complaint, consequently yes, she would.

Can you get a restraining proclaim on someone in prison so when they carry out they can't harm you.?

I hold two sons, their father is in prison for getting a 13 year prehistoric girl pregnant, he was 27. He be into drugs really bad and stole from everyone he know. He has be writing letters truism what a great person he is immediately, I really don't believe him but that's not the issue. I don't want him to be able to acquire out of prison and disrupt the boys lives more than he already has. I am by no method saying that he can not see his kids but really how am I suposed to know what open-handed of person he is going to be. I don't want him to obtain out and go to their university or something. We have no custody papers or anything we hold never been to court, he have never paid child support, I simply want to make sure my boys aren't anymore upset by this experience than thay already are going to be. I don't want him to know how to hurt them anymore. What are my options, any concept?

Answers: In order to capture a restraining order, you will enjoy to convice the court he is a threat to you and your family.

You enjoy not mentioned anything the court will transport into consdieration for this. Unless there is more to it, you probably will not attain one granted.

The charge he is in for is not a threat to your boys, and the drug problem probably won't be considered any, seeing he will be clean when he get out.

If there is more to it, you should christen your local women's shelter for guidance, they have advocate that could help you.

What is the thing call that lawyers read through to see the results of previous court cases?

Question speaks for itself, heh

Answers: There are several different sets of books certain as "reporters" (containing the full text of decisions) and "digest", collecting summaries of similar cases by topic.

Courts and publishers also produce "credit sheets" regarding cases as they come down, earlier they are included in a book.

West's Digest
Shepherd's Citations
There are permitted anthologies that go by subject concern.
And of course, tenet reviews and journals.

Lexis Nexis

Can you file a lawsuit against against an immigrant who threatened to massacre you?

This is a 100% serious question. Can you database a lawsuit against against an immigrant who threatened to kill you and also kicked you surrounded by the knee several weeks next. The direct statement made against me was: "You are going to see glory in 2 weeks." And later several weeks later I be kicked in the knees by this person, aggrivating a previous knees injury? What steps can I take to bring back compensated?

Answers: Yes! You can. File a police report first, then do what it take to file the canon suit.

That isn't a civil case, its a 100% a criminal covering. If there be any witnesses you would. You would have a satchel for battery contained by from the kick to the knees.

Assault is either the intent to commit battery-operated, or the arousal of fear of bodily spoil in another soul, in a demeanour other than by the use of words. In some states the attempt to commit mobile must be accompanied by the "present knack to succeed" (i.e. the means near which to actually inflict bodily damage.)

Battery is the act of using force against another creature which results in any bodily injury or offensive touching. It does not obligation to be intentional; force applied with criminal negligence is sufficient to be considered mobile. In addition, the force does not own to be directly applied to the victim. For example, directing a dog to attack someone is considered freestyle.

My advice would be to report it to your local sheriff or municipal police department depending where on earth you live.

You may not have a lawsuit even so. Did you file assault charges against this soul with the police? If so, what be the outcome? You may be able to profile a civil suit against him, but if he has nil, you'd be spinning your wheels and won't find any money.

First rule of suing: Only sue people (or businesses) that hold money.

And if the immigrant is illegal, you may interweave up getting them deported and nothing more for you. Think going on for your options first.

Why would you database a lawsuit? To collect money? You should press charges against them.

Do you think that the passing penalty should be legalized surrounded by Canada? if so why?

This is for an essay I'm doing and I just want some facilitate...

Answers: Before you make up your mind, purloin a look at the way the passing penalty have actually functioned surrounded by the United States.

You don't have to sympathize near criminals or want them to avoid a terrible punishment to ask if the demise penalty prevents or even reduce crime and to think going on for the risks of executing innocent people. Your interrogate is much too important to settle on the argument of sound bites or in need answers to these.

125 people on loss rows have be released with proof that they be wrongfully convicted. DNA is available in smaller number than 10% of all homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent nation.

The death cost doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the death cost to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The death cost is neither. Homicide rates are higher contained by states and regions that have it than contained by those that don’t.

We have a angelic alternative. Life without parole is very soon on the books within 48 states. It means what it say. It is sure and swift and rarely appealed. Life lacking parole is less expensive than the loss penalty.

The destruction penalty costs much more than time in prison, mostly because of the allowed process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent people.

The demise penalty isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants next to the worst lawyers. It doesn't apply to ethnic group with money. When is the later time a wealthy entity was on demise row, let alone executed?

The annihilation penalty doesn't necessarily give support to families of murder victims. Murder casualty family member across the country argue that the drawn-out death cost process is painful for them and that natural life without parole is an appropriate alternative.

Problems beside speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent people released from annihilation row had already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent individual.

As an American I say that on the Flip side, if you do standardize capital punishment, at hand has to be some law in place that keep a tight rein on the amount of appeals a death row inmate can generate. In theory the Death Penalty is a cheaper route but contained by actuality it turns out to be alot more expensive because of the constant legal fees these murderers pile which cessation up being rewarded for by the Taxpayer.

More Questions and Answers:
[214] - [2029] - [1759] - [2403] - [2480] - [1968] - [286] - [1180] - [1547] - [376] - [2524] - [128] - [1321] - [210] - [1348] - [1699] - [2535] - [1889] - [1070] - [528]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: