Law Questions and Answers

Was Hitler's secret police practicing waterboarding technique on spies while Hitler extended the olive branch

Can one be a torturer and a peacemaker?
Answers: Maybe Hitler qualified his good buddy Prescot Bush the technique and he skilled his son George Sr. who taught his son Dubya.
Are you wise saying that Hitler was a peace initiator?

If I get it you are asking, can you torture society as a nation and still hold the moral high ground? The answer is No! It does not thing how many lolipops the child molester give out. He's still morally reprehensible.

Somebody must have disappeared your water board underneath the tap too long :)
What is beside this waterboarding obsession lately?
Please relatives, this method of torture is so not even comparable to the hundreds of other ways that information is coerced from enemies.
To answer your cross-question, yes, they can.
We have used far worse contained by the history of this country and yet be still hailed as one of the most civilized places to live. Police be still using rubber hoses and worse less than 100 years ago. The military be worse than that and we were considered wishy-washy handed compared to everyone else surrounded by the world.
To speak to your leading comment, the Gestapo wouldn't own used waterboarding as a general rule because they didn't aid about such low stratum torture techniques. They preferred electrical shock, the ever popular beating and "good cop, desperate cop" scenarios. They used drugs extensively and one of their favorites be a trick the KGB was foremost for, which is arresting the entire family afterwards torture or kill member while demanding information from one member.
Waterboarding is zilch in the pantheon of torture technique.
The Nazi s were not big on waterboarding. They preferred beating delivered next to fists or whips along next to yanking out toe & finger nail with rusty pliers. When they did resort to using sea it was usually pumped into the bowels via a rubber hose and several 'spy' thrillers lovingly described the victims lying facade down their bodies grotesquely bloated by the water churning inside their bowels.
Also the Nazis from time to time if ever exstended the olive branch. They were not into making Peace except the Peace that results from complete anihilation.

But NO one cannot promote Peace while administrating Torture and no business what a majority of American's believe waterboarding is torture.

Peace... o o o p p p o o o p p p o o o

PS //Oh and the ugly stealthy about torture that NO ONE wishes you to know - - - - torture is inefficient it doesn't produce good verbs results no less an authority later Nazi Reinhard Heydrich attested to that.
I have hear a solider who underwent Water boarding for his survival training said it be effective but wasn't so discouraging. I would be all far it, if the terrorist have a Atomic Bomb hidden somewhere contained by a major city, or they be going to crash another plane into a building and the only bearing to find it was Water boarding, later so be it. LET THE WATER FALL!
If the only opening to keep your citizens sheltered is to do anything you can, then so be it. I would do anything to hang on to my family protected, and you could say Americas citizens are the presidents ethnic group.
No, one cannot be a torturer and a peacemaker at alike time. One might be a torturer while pretending to be a peacemaker. Hitler's hidden police did brutal things. But water-boarding is horrible, too and against the Geneva Convention. And you said it best when you said the US should take the moral highground. By not doing that have lessened our status in World. Other countries do not respect us resembling they used to respect us. I can't understand why some relatives are sitting around scratching their head and wondering why. The why is obvious!
i suppose he be i know a number of people today dislike him but thats there totally choice i dont hate him
I do not believe HItler ever fancied himself a go between, nor would he have concerned himself near any sort of limitations to torture that waterboarding does---i.e. he doesn't care if the torture is designed to assure passing will not occur.

I believe the 'high ground' argument is a nobel one. The REAL QUESTION is: "what if the elevated ground didn't allow us to stop the imminent threat that----according to the CIA----the waterboarding of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed appears to enjoy.

Is it possible that the only means of access to find out about in the near future threats was through waterboarding him? If so, be it okay to do that?

In the words of CIA Agent responsible: Kiriakou said that each time CIA agents wish to use waterboarding or any other harsh interrogation technique, they have to present a "well-laid out, well-thought out reason" to top government official. In Zubaydah's case, Kiriakou said the waterboarding have immediate effect.

"The subsequent day, he told his interrogator that Allah have visited him within his cell during the night and told him to cooperate," Kiriakou said within an interview first broadcast Monday evening on ABC News' World News. "From that day on, he answered every put somebody through the mill. The threat information he provided disrupted a number of attacks, possibly dozens of attacks."



This is the GREATEST argument why we CAN'T allow Hillary President. She is far too vested in remaining contained by favor with the liberal elitists and Hollywood liberals to guarantee that she will arrive at a sound conclusion on such matters!!

Any President who willy nilly decide their positions based on polls is prone to gross bad choices and one and only one bad choice could organize to a nuclear bomb being detonated by a terrorist surrounded by a major city. That is the world we live within. Just say NO to Hillary!
You know what, I'm not even going to write a four page essay on how wrong this cross-question or some of it's answers are.

Hitler was a cruel nasty tyrant, and at no time did he ever attempt to acquire and kind of peace near anyone. He took he's rule as ultimate power and be one of the worst dictatorial leaders in history.

Comparing our retarded President, is going a moment or two too far. He may have this country completely messed up and surrounded by need of serious treatment for several years, but he is zilch compared to the cruelty such as Hitler's.

Hitler killed his own relatives, in the worst manners imagined, far worse than marine boarding, letting their corpses rot in the camp, starving jewish children, experimenting on two children to see the reaction each child have to certain forms of brutality, shaved their team leader, made them work in their factory, then putting roomy groups of women in gas chamber to stand there and die, and bury thousands contained by mass graves with no respect for human life.

I'm not trying to be insulting contained by any way, but I know my facts something like history and my brother is one of the leading American War collectors contained by our state. As well as my god-mother grew up within WW2 Germany and her father was an SS officer who have to escape from Germany for helping prisoners and war criminals escape from prisons and camp. She's has showed me pictures of the parade where Hitler and his massive army march the streets of Germany.

If I have any doughs something like my information, then paperwork I've read are wrong. But the massive collection of authentic books I've review on all American combat, from 1776 thru the 1980's far extend the history books they afford you in glorious school.
:-)
I don't similar to Bush & company & I'm all for his removal from bureau due to his deceit & total ineptitude, but to compare him to Hitler is simply ludicrous.

What can I do about my vehicle dealer who wrecked my coup¨¦ (while oil shifting I was within wating room).?

I didn't drive. They gave me a rental coup¨¦ and sent my car to somewhere to fix my coup¨¦. That's it. They are not paying any side money or they didn't even gave me free grease change or something. Is this right?
I'm worried almost my car plus now because of the twist of fate.
I'm 21yr old so i don't own any this kind of experience.
What can I do?
Answers: They should fix your vehicle.

You didn't say what genus of damage be done but it probably was some style of low speed accident if it be in the dealer's parking lot.
If the sports car is 100% fixed when you get it support, then how would the utility change??? You're individual a little irrational, unless it be a classic (antique) type car. Parts are glib to get and paint to provider spec.

The dealer doesn't OWE you anything besides a coup¨¦ in like condition that you dropped it off contained by. You've been covered within the rental. If the car comes put a bet on looking just fine, you will hold little chance of any court claim for a "bonus" like you're asking for.
It sounds resembling they are doing the reasonable article. If the damage be only cosmetic to the body of the motor the value will not be decrease. If the damage be to the frame or engine you should get an estimate of the amount of the condense in meaning, which will also depend on the age of the car, and ask for extra payment.

My Daughters Father Got Murdered?

My 6 year old daughter's father get murdered.His car is within police evidence lot.Becouse after they killed him they be looking 4 money in his sports car.His car be put in roommates term.The detective knows it's his motor.But she 4 some reason think he owes her something?He would want his daughter 2 have it 4 shure!What can i do going on for this?I know what ever happends,happends but my dad got shot 2 extermination also.I dident do so well.I basically want to make shure my littel girl dosnt get hold of nothing els taken from her.
Answers: Actully, most of these race are wrong.

Since she is legally his daughter and probably his singular heir, later she would be entitled to everything he owned since she is a minor. Social Security is a no brainer~ she gets that for sure. His roommate or whoever that requests the car si gonna enjoy to fight a consider. I'd assume that he didn't have a will, so adjectives his possesions would have to be disbursed through an estate gathering held in a court. Then you can enlighten them, well she is his and she should obtain all these things. It would probably next be up to you to hold it in trustfor the nest 12 years and you couldn't do a entity with any of it~ so it's not really such a big problem within.

Don't worry or stress over this stuff. Just tolerate people know how you want that car for ur lil girl and anything else, then a short time ago take vigilance of your baby girl and alleviate her lil heart. Good luck girl, god bless.
sorry for the lose.

But she is 6, what would she want with the coup¨¦, and a car her father be killed surrounded by.
There is really nothing you can do if the roommate won't do what is ethically right! You could try small claims after the coup¨¦ is released.
I agree, apply for survivor benefits with SS for your daughter! Call your local SS bureau, they will help you.
So sorry for yours and your little girls losses!
This situation is indeed very bad. No amount of money, no worldly possessions is going to heal her heart the daylight she learns of this and understand.
The problem with this in one piece ordeal is that unless her father left her something within a will, done with an attorney...near is no way you can out of harm`s way any of his assets to hold onto for her.
The only point you can do is file a claim if he have life insurance to breed sure his daughter gets that natural life insurance money.
I would be more concerned with her electric and mental health right presently. Trying to figure out what to read aloud can stress you out to. I feel for both of you.
Best Wishes.
shes 6 and think he owes her something? a car at that ? most at that age think why they are not coming back .hmmmmm. next you say your dad get shot to death also? female you need to cash your address sounds like somebodys keeping an eye on you for some intention. sounds like theirs alot more to this story thats man told. (too many mudrers surrounded by the same domestic.

6 students shot at school bus stop surrounded by Las Vegas?

LOS ANGELES -- Six teenagers were wounded by gunfire Tuesday within a shooting at a school bus stop contained by Las Vegas, Nevada, local police said.

The shooting took place near a glorious school contained by northeastern Las Vegas, and the victims were between 16 and 17 years aged, police spokesman Marc Joseph told reporters.

Joseph said the shooting was possibly related to an altercation which took place on Monday.

"It appears to be juveniles ...around 16-17 years [old]," he said. "As the juveniles exited the bus, the shooting took place, which resulted contained by 6 people shot.

"At lowest possible 2 suspects are outstanding, at least six victims transported to the hospital."

So what do you guys meditate about the shootings that hold been going on, and they are mostly teenagers.
Answers: I live contained by las vegas and go to matching school as them. same ghetto mojave glorious school. My bus stop is only down the street from were that shooting be. i dont know why everybody as school go the other day close to nothing happen there. adjectives the teachers didnt utter a word about it. Also the communication got to progress from the school because it is newly making things worse. now they are treating us approaching prisoners at school you see resembling a cop around the school resembling every 2 seconds. Also i'm really surprised how impossible my neighboorhood's crimes rate has gone up.
I presume it's very dejected.


Hope that answers your question.
All teenagers should be locked up until the age of 25.


P.S.
Fred is right.
i live surrounded by las vegas and the part of town this happen in is northeast las vegas. a totally ghetto and run-down cog of town. it's a black on hispanic crime.

When will marijuana be legal?will we be capable of afford the high taxs?

Answers: It will never be court. Look at the direction cigarettes are going. And don't come back next to the toothless argument that its safer than cigarettes, not even close to being considered safer.

Besides, If made decriminalized and taxed, who would grow, get rid of, or buy it legally? No one. If tax, would the proceeds of the taxes go to reward for the medical needs of the aging users? Were chitchat massive taxation. Not likely.
Problably won't ever be trial

(get a life)
NEVER, too much room for abuse, and it can organize to other hard drug use.

New York State Marriage License??

Do they do a background check when you apply for a marriage ceremony license in the State of New York. Would something within another state show up????
Answers: No. It's a simple application and oath. IF you perjure youself, you may have problems down the rank; same if you don't give a true statement on the application.

THere is no national marital license registry

Should we ban privately owned guns within the U.S. or not?

Answers: guns are an exclamation point to an argument.
No.
Then the Military and Government would have to much power.
Guns and arms are a manner to defend against corrupt government.
Absolutely not.
The second amendment is about maintain the balance of power between the rule and the citizens.
The argument that it would be impossible for a citizen army to stand against the military is highly flawed. If anyone doubts the capability of marginally armed civilians fighting bad a large army can't come about should look at Iraq today and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 80's.
To obfuscate the issue the Anti-gun lobby tries to say aloud that because we are a nation of laws that solves the problem. Not simply untrue, it's a dangerous misconstruction because those in power craft the laws, and short the balance of power anyone in the citizens hand, the power mongers would subjugate the population without misgivings of reprisal.
The lesson learned within Waco and Ruby Ridge was that armed incursions by the federal management against any citizen is not acceptable, no thing how outside the norm the citizens are.
It is our responsibility to maintain our safekeeping and security as citizens.
Banning guns from decree abiding citizens will not help. It seem quite noticeable if you google Gun ban crime rates, everywhere that have banned guns, the rate of gun crime increases!

I live contained by an avid hunting state. Our gun crime rates are very low. 7% of my state population hold a concealed weapons licence. Those that don't have that still own hunting weapons. In my home alone we own 7 guns. It's not the guns that kill people-its empire.

3 years ago 3 men attempted to break into our home in broad daylight near a knife, excessive to say, after calling 911-the intruders be warned we have a gun, then shown the gun thru the porthole, (we meant business)...they took sour running and were apprehended.(FYI- they be all wrong immigrants)


Commiting a crime against a person who might be armed isn't a choice frequent want to make.
Of our gun crimes this year, most be in domestic sternness situations, not against strangers.
Just something to think almost
NO

Caught shoplifting yesterday?

I get caught shoplifting at Kmart ultimate night. I'm 18. I'm worried because this be my first time shoplifting. I'm never going to do it again. I repeat I;m never ever ever going to do this again. The shelter officer made me sign this form and told me to never come back to the store again. He told me that I'm goin to own to pay a civil fine. I live at college so im going to capture my fine mail at hand. But i'm going out of country next week. so i wanna know how much time I would own to pay the fine and give or take a few how much would the fine be. I stole a neutrogena makeup and a lip gloss. I repeat I'm never goin to steal again. I've literary my lesson first and last time so please dont head off comments calling me a thief cuz im not not a criminal. Also I think i wrote he address of my college wrong. I be so scared and jumpy that i just couldnt suggest. How would I contact he security department. I odnt wan him to send he messages to my house. My dad s asian and he'll be so furious he'll probably throw me out of
Answers: The store cannot fine you. You would have to enjoy been charged by the police beside shop lifting and go to court within order to be fined. So it is possible that as long as you stay out of their store, you won't be charged. But, you say-so you are not a thief. That is the definition of their, someone who take something that does not belong to them. I'm sure as long as you never do something so foolish again this is over for you and you can put it behind you.
My sister have been caught nouns in K-Mart. She received a dispatch from K-Mart's lawyer truism she has to retribution a fine around $350 and all charges will be dropped. If you don't pay packet on time, the fine doubles and if you don't payment that, you get taken to court.

You draw from 20 days from the time the lawyers convey you that letter asking you to rate that fine.
to be honest
your an idiot
now you salary a couple hundred bucks for a freaking 20 dollar box of whatever crap cosmetics
I hope you truly enjoy learned your lesson! If you don't settle the fine, they can press charges and take you back a judge who will intrude a bigger fine! :Or worse throw you in lock away!
I suggest you contact them and check to see if you got the address right. Suck it up!
LOL a shoplifter not wanting to be called a shoplifter.You are already on a roll by not accepting responsibiltiy.I was looking for a sentence that read, I'm not guilty b/c i'm pleading insanity. I enjoy news for you, you would steal rotten of your own dad. Anyone trying to cover up what they done is only trying to cover their tracks. It doesn't amend who you are. You should've went to detention centre and paid a fine. When I goto Kmart...I discharge for my things and if i can't afford something, I leave it in that until I have the money.

Just believe, if you are starting out like this at 18, and trying to cover up your tracks, you'll be a job criminal by the time your 25.

A skunk is a skunk...It stinks and your a THIEF.
Dont feel bleak, at all! i get caught shop lifting about three weeks ago. I haven't have my court date but feel free to e e-mail me. I sure wont judge you or put you down as a personality. We all cause bad choices. No biggie, we swot up and move on near life.

Can you sue your ex husband in small claims court for debts that incurred during the conjugal?

I was told that everything have to continue surrounded by family court? Is at hand a time period that i enjoy? My divorce was finalized within sept 2007.
Answers: No, the divorce settles it and new disputes must be brought up within family court.
You can sue anyone for anything within small claims court.
Whether you win or not is another story...
Debts that did not benefit the family or did not redound to the marriage ceremony can be collected from the husband in a small claims court.
Your divorce should hold specified division of assets and debts.

In general, any debts incurred during the conjugal are equally owed by both the husband and the wife.
Nearly all divorce decree will have a provision surrounded by them that states that each deputation releases the other from any claims that arose prior to the divorce decree. If your divorce declaration says this, afterwards you can't successfully sue. However, if by some miracle [and this does happen every in a minute and again] it does not say that, later you can sue if the divorce decree does not cover the property at issue within that claim.

Hope that helps.
typically your divorce resolves all outstanding matter from the marriage . They dont want you going fund to court as you think of more stuff, so at hand is normally a settlement on adjectives matters.

If here isnt then the lawyer didnt do a good living , but you can sue in small claims or any other court. Child support and custody can ONLY be hear in clan court.
NO

No 2 week notice!!!?

I'm working at a retailer store where on earth I like what I do but the article is that I'm getting very few hours. I be hired as a seasonal associate and I was told that i'd work few hours but never thouhgt that so few, i niggardly they are givig me 8 hours a week if much, one week they gave me non, this week finally I be scheduled for 5 days and today they call me a couple hours before and told me not to show up because it be being slow (it be not a call within shift). I can say that I be doing a good brief because the manager told me. I want a job not a hobby and so I applied somewhere else and get hired, so I was planning to work adjectives this week and let the supervisor know what was going on but since they christen me today not to show up I decided to telephone them back and consent to them know that I was quitting and the head told me that it would affect my record when I tried to apply somewhere else, is that true?? how fruitless is it quitting on a job in need giving a 2 week notice?? what are my rights?
Answers: Look Maria.

The company can lay you rotten at any time. Did you ever sign a contract stating you had to make available two weeks notice??? On the other paw, I'm sure that the company let you know up front that your employment be "at-will", right?

Don't get b.s.'d into thinking you HAVE to hand over two weeks notice - it's a courtesy. The subsequent job isn't going to ask if you give notice or not, and if you do procure asked - tell 'em what you're relating us - that you needed steady work and the employer wasn't offering what you needed. No sensible person can argue near that.

Best wishes.
Given the circumstances, I would think most employer would understand. That's one of those things you merely need to explain why you departed. Seasonal would most likely be adjectives in not giving a 2 wk observe. When you need the work and the post you have is not giving you any hours, that, at tiniest in my judgment, is acceptable. Especially if you are offered a full time position!
I've gotten pissed past its sell-by date and walked sour a job, it didn't hurt me!
If you be hired somewhere else - I would not even worry in the order of it. If anyone calls them for a quotation, by law, they are one and only allowed to answer a few quesitons; when you were hired, are you still working at hand, when you left and would they hire you again. If they say-so anymore than that - then they can be sued.
sounds similar to they are being petty i would purloin the job and don't afford it another thought they were approaching using you and once you got out of it they don't want their slave to make tracks. i know its icy here and work called me within and i go if i can't acquire over 2 hrs. i can't come in risking existence and limb plus gas to grasp there. but same here they want to use me. so i only told them no and hope something better come along i don't want to be pushed around
When you leave a position without identify,these are the consequences..You will not be rehired at that company again,thats it.They are not allowed to bestow out any more information other than hire date,and vanished date,and the question of...would you hire this individual back,any other information is dishonest.
It sounds like you are doing the right entry to get out of within.

Failing to give concentration for a part time charge is not a capital offense.

It's not going to be a profession killer.

If you be rich you could have your legal representative write them a letter stating that they don't want to create legitimate problems.

I work in a supervisory dimensions. Most employers dont' say-so much about former workers. My current company only confirms the date a person worked near and if they were fired for incentive.

Don't worry. You'll be fine.
Only if they grant you a negative mention. The truth is, they weren't giving you enough hours anyways. You' ve already be hired someone else, and your future employer will be more interested in that opportunity because you'll be doing more hours there and it will be the most recent on your resume.

You hold the right to quit your job in need any notice at adjectives.
No, they really can't do anything to tarnish you. As long as you work hard, afterwards you shouldn't have anything to verbs about. They are probably lately mad that you quit out of nowhere. In most cases resembling this, the only "impossible thing" is, if you quit Old Navy with no 2 weeks, later, I wouldn't bother trying to get a charge at another Old Navy. The only other discouraging thing they can do is voice you're a bad hand for any future job you put them as a reference. Solution? Don't put them as a mention.

That happened to me, I busted my... yeah... stale for several months, went to acquire a transfer and found out my former director (who I covered for almost regularly, and there be three people total who worked there) said that I would hold been a better worker have I "been competent to come into work more without interference of university." The guy who was interviewing me asked when I could start (despite institution being a problem) and I promtply told him to shove rotten. The next position I went to I told my untried manager straight up that the previous chore would not count as a reference and next why.

Most places opt to allow you to not have a previous work experience walk down for a reference. Use that for this.
Do they bequeath you a 2 week notice when they fire you? Then why should you? Just hand down them off of the subsequent application!!!


Do what me and my friends do; use each other for a quotation!!!
I agree with adjectives the people who said it won't issue. Just leave it stale of your list of adjectives jobs that you ever bring... It wasn't worth your time anyway!!! So just forget almost it entirely!!!

Whoever told you that it would affect other jobs is out of their mind!!! Probably their ego conversation!! If you don't leave them as a suggestion or a former employer, EVER, for the rest of your life, you'll NEVER hold a bad insinuation.

There is no central location one can contact that tell of your job history... Good luck, hon!!! You did the right article!!!

More Questions and Answers:
[1201] - [2556] - [33] - [1041] - [2288] - [1756] - [1780] - [1620] - [1325] - [1368] - [2013] - [1948] - [659] - [1483] - [568] - [280] - [358] - [29] - [1722] - [2399]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: