Law Questions and Answers

Is there a decree in BC Canada that say children at the age of 15 CANNOT move out?

I am fifteen, Live in bc and want to move out of my moms place
and move to ontario near my boyfriends family. I do not want any proposal and to be told i shouldnt go. Is here a law or any officially recognized way my parents can MAKE me stay? Is in attendance a law that will bring in me stay at home? Information please..
Answers: one day you will regret your finding and it is better to stay with yr parents.
If in that is, it must be a new ruling.

Once upon a time Canada had a problem near child runaways, maybe still do. Anyhow when kids found, earlier returning home, the juvenile court system would do an investigation to find out
* was at hand child abuse (good object to runaway), maybe the kid belongs contained by foster card
* is this child sufficiently mature to live on his or her own, but newly not able to earn adequate money to dos so ... in which suitcase there can be a court declaration that the parents pay ample money to the child (like divorce alimony) so that the child can live apart from the parents

In your case, surrounded by addition to asking the Juvenile Court system for what your rights etc. are, at hand is also the age of consent. You are probably too young to officially have sex next to your boyfriend.

My neighbor always complains more or less my car.?

we both live within a condo. hes always running into my garage and complaining that it stinks. he requests me to park it along the curb, even though i own the place, i try to cooperate by parking it in the saloon port away from his house, but that still doesnt work. he threatens to call the police on me because my coup¨¦ is "affecting" his health. is that possible? i be a sign of, my car is ancient, but not THAT old. can he really beckon the police just for that? and if he does, what will come to pass? am i really supposed to move my car? thankyou.
Answers: Well anyone can appointment the police. That doesn't mean they will do anything. As long as your vehicle is insured, tagged and officially parked, there isn't anything he can do beside the police.

Now you said you live in a condo. There may be some special restrictions contained by your lease/purchase agreement. Double check these because they can have restrictive convenants against things resembling old cars. I know that sounds dumb, but if it is within there, you are stuck beside it.
A person can ring up the police for any reason.
For example, I can claim that my naighbor make too much racket when he lands his UFO on the roof at 7 o'clock contained by the morning ... I work nights and approaching to be sleeping then.
If I did that, the police might phone up the men in the white coats to evaluate my mind.

If I was you, I would ask the neighbor for a statement signed by his doctor, explaining what the problem is.

A remote possibility exists that your neighbor have a health problem. Some inhabitants are overly sensitive to a variety of pollutants.

For example, I own a lady friend near ashma. Second hand cigarette smoking literally can eliminate her ... she can't breathe, literally. She has tro rush outside, gain away from that poison.

People without such form problems are less sensitive, don't concentration anything wrong.

In many cities, in that are ordinances related to the amount to which a car may pollute the environment next to its exhaust. It may be that if you were living contained by such a city you would need to do something that your vehicle can pass that inspection. In the sheltered space fo the garage, the exhaust from the car may be more noticalble than outdoors.

Does the neighbor drive? Is it a vehicle like yours or some sympathetic of electric hybrid?

Does the neighbor have any intention to be in the garage?

Is the garage situated so that exhaust fumes acquire from there to the living billet? If so, there's a need to fix the drying.
You are obviously lower than threat from your wicked neighbor, since the problem is your saloon, I think you should reach a deal to him/her out of it and discussed the problem as two adult that should be, if it is the motor really bothers him/her or something else.

Since this is your place referring to your garage, I donot think he/she have the privileges of calling the shots here, but to make the party feel his threat consent to him/her do his threat and call the police I don`t know a third party will do the trick in relation to your problems.

Death Threats With A Blocked Number?

I received a call the other time at 10:00 at night threatening my duration. I am 16 years old. He be saying how if I didn't win him drugs then he'd eliminate me. He knew what institution I go to and know who my friends are. He MIGHT be somebody I know and it just human being a joke, but hes call a few times, I only answered once though. I'm just about 50/50 on it being a friend. But this soul definitely know who I am.
I think he know where I live too. My press is: What should I do? If it's just a jape or not, I don't want the reputation of being a snitch, but I am pretty upset. I don't necessarily want to have this personage arrested or get the police involved because I want to find out who it is first, but if I hold to the police is an option that I would enjoy to but wouldn't want to take.
Please tender me all the information you can provide. Thank you impressively much for responses.

-Dan
Answers: If they call again share them you dont know if it is a joke or not and that you are going to the police. You can step down and make a report, but surrounded by all actuality they wont do a adjectives lot. I was getting departure threats about 10 times a year for about a month, and they didnt do a point for me because the guy was doing it from a prepaid cell phone and he be basically homeless. You will hold to have a police investigator find the number for you though.

And ya know, it might newly be me, but I would rather be labeled as a snitch afterwards dead. If it is a kid then that entity needs to grow up and revise that some actions hold consequences.
Making a threat over the phone is a crime. You do not need to engross in criminal investigation. Talk to your parents and ring the police. They may be able to lend a hand or at the very lowest, get you insist on. Your parents can change their number.

If it be a joke, I reason someone would have have their laugh and consent to you off the hook. It sounds resembling you need to bring this as a serious threat and get your parents and the cops involved.
telephone call *69 after he calls, it automaticaly calls/shows thee ultimate number who called you even if the number is blocked
Itcosts a small duty of 1.00 but it should be easy to put together an excuse to your parents.
Cal the police and tell them when the phone was made and they can look up your phone number and report to you what the real number be. They will not press charges unless you request that you want that. So if it is a friend messing with you after you can tell them not to do anything and transport on with your middle-of-the-road life.
can i assume you used *69 to find out their number? if you run to obtain the number, do not um and ah to report it. if it is a friend, then its a pretty stupid trick they're pulling and they deserve whatever official action that will be taken against them. in recent times be safe going on for it and tell your parents and contact the police..they should start an investigation. best of luck and purely be careful.
Let it jump. Obviously the guy's a coward. If he really wanted you to disquiet him, he would be sure you knew who he be. It was probably a fraternity prank. Or an older girlfriend.

You don't want to be a snitch ? With a guy who is threatening your life ? Yeah, I wouldn't read out anything too and after he makes a few more call he just might catch bold enough to rotten someone. Then you can take pride that you enabled him within that murder. That should get you to sleep powerfully down the road.

Get control of your fear. Maybe it would relieve to know that ALL fear is irrational (meaning it have no basis within reality). I'll say it again, ALL FEAR IS IRRATIONAL. That should become your mantra.

Now budge do something. Tell somebody. The police are the logical ones. They'll be able to find out at lowest the phone that the call come from. You can decide to whip it from there.
Ok... first you own to ask yourself this question...
"Do I want to be considered a snitch or do I want to be dead"

Death threats are not to be taken weakly.
You need to have a word to your parents, let them know what's going on, and afterwards you need to travel to the Police.
From there, the Police will contact the phone company and trace where on earth each of your incoming call is coming from.

I could understand if a friend did it once of late to mess with you, but if you utter it keeps going on, then it's probly not one of your friends, at the outstandingly least... not a devout friend.

take supervision
My feeling is that you want to tell the police ASAP.

They probably will do nil about it.

But if subsequently you are dead surrounded by mysterious circumstances, they have it on transcript that you made this statement, and they will do a serious job of tracing phone call to you.

I would alert the people contained by charge where I progress to school, or work, strength club, favorite restaurant etc., that I have be receiving destruction threats. Please, if you see any stranger haning around my car, my organization, my locker, whatever, I want to know roughly speaking it. And Please, do not you confront the stranger ... I would not want you getting killed. Undoubtedly some of them will ask what the police are doing something like it.

Then the next time nearby is any kind of trouble any of those places, the citizens there will be asking the police investigatiors if they contemplate this has anything to do beside the death threats. This surrounded by turn might lead to the police taking the departure threats more seriously.

I have be down that road.

I have have both death threats and actual annihilation attempts.

In my experience, the people who do demise threats are blow hards who like to panic people. The really worrisome people are those who try to destroy you, rape you, whatever, and don't push their intentions in credit.

I had my phone # changed, several times ... unlisted #, thought I be very cautious who I gave the spanking new # out to.

I had tons conversations with phone company and tenet enforcement that were entirely unsatisfying.
One of them asked what drugs I be taking.

The phone company had me do a log of when I get the abusive call, then they said that nearby are so many inhabitants complaining about this sympathetic of thing that they enjoy budgeted only so much money to business deal with it & the trouble architect was not calling me repeatedly enough to support their efforts. I be getting several of these calls day by day, filling my answer mechanism & waking me up at 3 am.

I would achieve all the locks changed on my home, check wellbeing of windows, see more or less getting security lights installed outside adjectives doors and windows.

After reporting this to the police & zilch happening, I would also put on alert my neighbors to keep their doors locked. There is a slayer on the loose & the police not taking it seriously. I am warning you to be alert see your kids.

Then the next time here is a violent crime contained by the neighborhood, the public would ask the police how come they did not investigate your complaint, and this time you would get accomplishment.

In my case, years after that I figured out it be people I have thought were my friends, but I surface like some topics are too serious to use as pranks. There own been inhabitants who have done bomb threats and alleged anthrax contained by the snail mail ... they thought it be a prank ... I think they are brain unmoving.
i thought is was a disappearance threat against aboutsometing i did'
i did not know who is the real perosn an d no on else does. it is tough for anyone to go to the police if here is one. we might get the wrong one whichi itcould come about.
of course you dont want to getinvoleve and take hurt by it andp
pray toGod that iw t was n vever hapend...
First and foremost TELL your parents. Explain that you're pretty sure it's a friend playing a set-up but was concerned and feel they should know. Tell them that you're going to tell adjectives your friends about the call and that you told your folks and if the calls keep at it they insist on calling the police and report it and have the entity found out.

If you have friends that are into drugs start next to them first and then consider getting yourself some up to date friends. If you're pretty sure none of your friends are into drugs and the caller know you so well after it's one of them but a death threat is never something to help yourself to lightly. Especially after we've experienced several killing involving students killing other students.

Tell your parents Dan.

My daughter fall contained by the parking lot of the apartments where i live, she go down onto a screw stock in the floor?

minus any advise or signal she made a weighty puncture in her knees, can i sue them?
Answers: Basically, you have to demonstrate that the proprietor was slipshod. Was there something unsafe roughly speaking the parking lot that would make her trip and stumble?

I once worked at a restaurant, and we had a kid stumble out of a booth and break her arm. At first I just assumed our insurance would income for it. However the insurance company denied their claim. There was nil faulty almost the booth to cause her to drop. Just because something happens on someone elses property, that doesn't manufacture them at fault.
Probably. You should speak next to an attorney about the baggage. If she was not seriously injuried, you probably would not hold many lawyer lining up to thieve the case.

Laws alter greatly from state to state. Your local attorney can help you more.
No.

Are they supposed to be inquiring the parking lot everyday for tiny screws? If she steps on a rusty staple on the sidewalk are you going to sue the city?

Sue them for what? Is she missing work? Did she have hospital bills because of this? What does she requirement money for?
Instead of suing. Why don't you take her to the doctor.

Oh and why don't you use the spell check factor. "screw stock " ??

Without any advice or signal SHE made a weighty puncture in her knees ??

I am sorry I really can not understand you.
Probally not, since it be the parking lot.

You would have to prove negligence on the chunk of the apartment complex.

And that would be impossible to do, for a screw stuck in the pavement of the parking lot.

What can be proposed as an amendment to an American Constitution? Please feel free to express yourselves.?

I would mostly would approaching to read about religious and racional discriminations.
Answers: To expunge process to remove - to erase.

Many states restore civil rights to ex-felons. It isn't a Federal issue but a State issue; expunging records is another globe of wax.

The Equal Rights Amendment - proposed in 1923 - be never ratified (35 of the mandatory 38 states). The goal be to guarantee equal rights under the imperative for Americans regardless of gender. 21 States, however, own included amendments to their State constitutions.

There have be many proposed Amendments - close to the abolition of the Electoral College (the "Every Vote Counts" Amendment) or the "Force a balanced budget" Amendment that I to some extent like and some that trade name my blood boil, like .. ANY Amendment that deal with religion, academy prayer, references the word "God" surrounded by any shape or form, any mention of "moment of silence", etc. ad infinitum. These things are unconstitutional on their obverse and have no business human being written in or even proposed. Ghastly.

No Amendment that ends the rights of women and their reproductive choices. No Amendment defining what "marriage" should be. No Amendment allowing non-natural-born citizens to become president (even if they have be here 20 years).

And the 16th Amendment was duly ratify by 40 states, including Ohio, and issued by proclamation in 1913. Following shortly, 2 other states also ratify. Under Article V of the Constitution, only 3/4s of the states are needed to ratify. (If the ERA have that many votes it would be the 28th Amendment.) Since that time, the courts hold consistently upheld the constitutionality of the Federal income tax.
How going on for if they actually ratify the 16th amendment
This is the income tax amendment
They never passed it (needed 36 states to ratify)
A majority of the stated didn't close to it because it taxed everyone at matching rate (parts of the country where poorer than others...it didn't bring in sense)
they didn't pass it, but they hold been scare us into paying it ...long time
I'd propose a Redemption Act, allowing for automatic expungement and full restoration of civil rights for any criminal based upon an proper passage of a time interval after when the person have served his or her sentence.

Right now, our society is barmy at crime and on a draconian law-making binge, and overpunishing crimes and lately branding folks forever.

If we are to be about rehabilitation, consequently we must do what we can to restore lives after the time has be served.
To add that it would be impossible for any president, congress or the judicial system to thieve rights away from the people, as they enjoy done in the so call patriot act.. This would enjoy to be done by the vote of the public not a bunch of officials that are motivated by scare..Shame on them.

Is it illegal for a rentacenter contained by indiana to sell a used mattress?

I be wondering if rentacenter could sell used mattresses or if it be illegal contained by Indiana to sell used mattresses?????
Answers: In some states it is. I don't know give or take a few Indiana.
It certainly is icky.

The Legal Flexibility of Double Jeopardy specifically in the movie FRACTURE?

In the movie Fracture a man shoots his wife who lives and is within a coma. He is charged with attempted murder. He is aquited on grounds of not plenty evidence. Later he then uses his court power of attorney to kill his wife by pulling the plug. At the bring to a close he is charged with murder surrounded by the 1st degree even though his shot be not the couse of death. She be killed officially and therfore he should not of been competent to have be charged with murder. In combination a doctor reported that she would of actually outlived her husband. Since the shot have nothing medically to do near her death and her butchery was contained by the peramiters of the law is it officially posible to charge the man with murder contained by the 1st degree.
Answers: As next to many movies, it have nothing to do next to the real tenet.

In most jurisdictions, attempted murder is considered a lesser-included offense of murder. As such, the acquittal of the man for attempting to shoot his spouse by shooting her (the attempted murder) would preclude a latter trial for killing his spouse by impossible to tell apart act of shooting her (the murder).

If he have not been tried previously for the attempted murder, the shooting would probably hold been considered a exact of death (i.e. to verbs the plug, she must already be legally dead), and he could own been tried for the murder.

How that view would hold up in court would probably depend of specific facts not noted contained by the movie. From the brief summary of facts that you gave (I own not seen the movie), a individual would not be allowed to "pull the plug" underneath those circumstances. However, when circumstances are appropriate, and a party follows through the correct legitimate channels, you can't be charged beside murder for legally pulling the plug, the murder charge would enjoy to be based on the imaginative shooting.
murder is the killing of someone next to malice and aforethought... if it is proven that he "pulled the plug" to prevent her from recovering and/or providing any nouns against him (it would have to be on a different charge than "attempted murder"), and that he have prior thought of this killing... it is murder.

first scope usually requires premeditation... and ny specifies that murder of a witness to a crime is first degree...

so yes, it could be done...
First, not a regulation expert.
I think the font of getting around double jeopardy was he be charged with attempted murder, so he could not be tried for that again. When she died by any mechanism, he would then be capable of be pursue the new charge of murder.
The shot, by him be the cause. If not for his activities, she would not have be in that situation.

Since the target was not unconscious, the murder charge would not be applicable in a lesser-included offense because it would own been the subsequent higher horizontal.

There was a crust of a guy that died 15 years after being shot. He lived a sort of normal natural life until his sudden death. During the autopsy they determined the result in of death be because of being shot. The shooter be charge with murder.

Oh and a pretty apposite movie.
I just finished watching the movie and purely hated the culmination.

I don't believe he could be charged with murder. I believe it would be double jeopardy.

Anyway, don't believe about someone human being prosecuted for a "crime". A person is in fact prosecuted for an "act". Police and prosecutors investigate an act, after decide what to call upon that act. From at hand the person is charged beside a crime. If you are acquitted on that selective crime, they can't change the cross of the crime to a lesser-included offense and retry you for the exact same act below a repackaged name.

Goofy example next to definitions:
simple assault - cause bodily injury to someone
aggravated assault - causing bodily injury to someone using a weapon

Let's read out it's late at dark and very threatening, you get into an altercation beside someone and they scratch you beside their nails. From within, they go to court for simple assault and are some how acquit. Now a few weeks later, a witness steps forward and say he saw the event. He says that the guy who attacked you didn't use his nail, he used a knife.

Goofy example, but the guy can not be charged next to aggravated assault. He has already be tried for that "act" (at the time it was labeled a simple assault) and be acquitted. The prosecutor can't collect unusual evidence on the same work, repackage the case underneath a new criminal offense title and move about back to court for duplicate act as beforehand.

Thinking of it in those lingo, we can say that the guy wasn't man tried for attempted murder - he was technically anyone tried for shooting his wife in the organizer. He was acquit of that act. From at hand, it doesn't matter that she latter died because of the gunshot wound to the head, he be acquitted of that work and is protected by double jeopardy.

Very good movie until the final five minutes.
The movie is correct. The New York Criminal Procedure Law provides an exception to the Double Jeopardy defense where "[o]ne of the offenses is assault or some other offense resulting within physical injury to a person, and the other offense is one of homicide base upon the death of such personality from the same physical injury, and such destruction occurs after a prosecution for the assault or other non-homicide offense." NY CPL 40.20(2)(d). The relevant "other offense" or "other non-homicide offense" here is attempted murder. However, because of issue preclusion, indubitable findings of fact contained by favor of a criminal defendant at a first trial in which he be acquitted may not be disputed by the prosecution at a second trial. A trial believe to be, however, at his/her discretion would likely allow the prosecution to do so due to the recently discovered evidence found in the movie, namely the weapon and the incriminating statements.

Also, details that most states have a similar exception. I may be incorrect within thinking that the movie took place in New York, but California and other states also own this exception in their criminal procedure statute codes.

Anyone know the law around quittinq a job and getting cut down to minimum wage? Is it court ?

I live in wisconsin and the situation I am at made us sign a paper that said if we dont make available a 30 day see to quit they can put our last check down to minimum wage????? Is that allowed???
Answers: It is if you sign it and don't give them a 30 morning notice of termination. I would any not sign it or make sure that I give my employer 30 days notice if I am quitting.
I would assume it would be if you deliberately signed the contract.

You were not forced to sign anything. You be not forced to work at that company. The terms of your employment be given to you by the employer and you accepted them.

Welcome to the legitimate world.
If you agreed to it, then they can pretty much do anything they want (since, technically, by signing it, you agree to it). However, it is kind of a crummy entry to do. If they did it without your ease or consent, then it would be banned, but you could have not signed the contract.

Why is it humane to put sick dogs to sleep but inhumane to put sick people to sleep?

Answers: From a humane point of judgment, I would say that it's because human beings can usually accomplish something even when they are totally bedridden. Dogs can't do anything but run around, etc... they can't read or wallow in television, movies, or other forms of mental stimulation. So, a dog who is confined to a pillow on the floor is really better served by relieving him of his misery and suffering.
Because dogs are animals, and people are humans. It's a great rank of distinction drawn, making us feel that we're more superior to the other lifeforms we share the planet next to. Thus, our lives are more valuable than theirs, and slaughter a human is bad, even if it be done to keep them from serious niggle.

This is the argument. Note: I don't agree with it.

Edit:

To those who say-so people don't spend as much money on medical bills as animals... you'd be surprised. Kidney transplants, chemotherapy, CT scan... bypasses will come as soon as a surgeon decide they want to.
No reason. Most of us will travel slowly and painfully. It is humane to citizens with terminal conditions to sleep. They immediately have that likelihood.

The main point it cannot done to humans is conflict of interest. How do you know a parent will not be put to sleep so the children inherit the money. Worse, insurance wants to free money. The dead lenient is a cheap patient to the insurance company.
Because the dogs can not threaten to sue us.

P
Good interrogate. I believe that people should enjoy control of their own destinies. I believe that people should not enjoy to suffer through lengthy terminal illnesses, and I believe that we should be allowed to die next to our dignity.
No one, no animal should have to needlessly suffer. Its similar to those who say they are pro vivacity, but pro war as very well. doesn't make sense.
Why is it okay to slaughter innocent civilians in a foreign country, but its not okay to agree to me die the way I choose?
Good cross-examine!
It depends on the sickness, if it's incurable and the person is contained by constant pain, consequently I do agree with it. I've have to live with someone surrounded by that state, and see someone in the hospital within that state, and I find it to be the most horrifying thing anyone can run through.

Both these people be on their last legs though, one have her "elevens" showing (back of the neck) and had a annihilation rattle.

The other be in a alcoholic coma and spitting up blood, also on her finishing minutes.

Your right, why isn't it humane to let them move about peacefully rather than to agree to them and the family suffer. Thank God, the hospitals, doctors and lawyer for DNR's.
It's real simple..we as a society suppose more of the suffering of our animals than we think of the suffering of our fellow man/woman. Every other argument given is BS.

When we obtain to the point in our evolution that we own as much compassion for ourselves as we do for our beloved animals and we really do not want to see our grandma, grandpa, mom or dad suffer and waste away next to some horrible disease.then we will truly enjoy come to a point where we can right to be heard we are fully humane!!!
Humane or inhumane is not the problem. Putting "sick people to sleep" is undemocratic, it's called murder. Who are you to desire on whether or not a person is too sick to live?

Now, if you are chitchat about "Assisted Suicide", specifically a different matter. Then the request for information becomes one of morality and nouns for the person wanting to die and the one assisting.
some states allow that, here contained by Oregon we have the assisted suicide decree

Questions about residency law - Wisconsin?

Hi, here is my situation first:
I own a home in Wisconsin. I am on SSDI and I enjoy HIRSP insurance - Wisconsin Health Risk Sharing Plan. My situation is that my wife passed away , and I really have no family/friends/job here or anything, my line lives in Texas. It may be best to hang on to my residency here, and either travel, stay next to some other people for a while, or doesn`t matter what. Or I could sell my house and adjectives that, but honestly I"m not sure if that makes any sense. I regard if I rent my house I cannot claim that this is my residence and I don't want to do that. I think it may be best to save my house and just win out of here and be around people whoactually guardianship about me. but later I leave the house untaken? or find someone to watch or stay contained by the house? how does all that work?

What are the law concerning residency in Wisconsin?

what do you have an idea that may be best?
thanks
Answers: As long as you maintain your home and keep getting post there you are ok. How commonly can you travel from Texas to Wis? Is there anyone you trust ample to stay in your house and pay cheque your utilities? I think not.

More Questions and Answers:
[2194] - [2174] - [1635] - [1088] - [1731] - [313] - [2001] - [2355] - [1390] - [2556] - [1008] - [2122] - [2204] - [1953] - [1425] - [648] - [1996] - [2066] - [2416] - [361]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: