Law Questions and Answers

If a burgler breaks into my house and eats a twix tablet and gets caught, does he enjoy to buy me a new twix banister?

Answers: Yep and he would go to intern for breaking and entering. Possilbly. It might depend on if you press charges or something. And I love twix bars.LOL
Yes, you can sue him civilly for damages. You would sue him to recuperate money equal to the cost of fixing or replacing any lost or damaged property - including the cost of a spanking new Twix bar. This is surrounded by addition to any criminal penalty imposed by the state.

Most criminals have no money to fill a judgment, but this remedy is in theory available in any crust.
lmao yes everything that he takes contained by one way or another he pays for one agency or the other. by money,or by buying it

If a steel bar falls bad a truck and impales you while driving, do you own the bar?

Answers: I should infer you would own the guy who was driving the truck and anything else you can get from him within court
No but you own the hole that it makes within you though. Usually they won't ask for it back cuz that would be objectionable. But actually the hospital would hold on to it to show the victim later either throw it away or endow with to the person to maintain. Hey I guess it does belong to them afterward.LOL. I know this because I watch truma go in the er so trust me on this one.LOL

Temporary residence license plate in New York State/City???

I am within New York City tending to a people emergency and my plate was stolen on September 16th, 2007. I file a police report in the Bronx, NY where on earth my family resides. The problem is that I obligation to drive back to Georgia (Cobb county) and I enjoy no license plate. None of my family member are at our residence because we are all attending to our situation in New York. Can anyone make clear to me what my options are? This is such a stressful situation.
Answers: Contact the NY Department of Motor Vehicles within the Bronx - they'll handle your situation. Bring your ingenious of your police report with you - they should hold given you a receipt for the loss of your plate, and the DMV will customarily waive the fee for a replacement or intervening plate.

Have you ever broken the law?

i am your local cop... its time to turn yourself contained by! CONFESS AND BE JUDGED! IT IS YOUR TIME!!!!
Answers: Yes. I killed a cop.
Yea,

But its none of your damn business. Cops resembling you on powertrips. DICKS.
Yes. Even been arrested.

And I deserved it, too.

No, No, No..wasn't a felony...
disorderly conduct.
The number of "laws" are so pervasive (and as a broad rule, stupid) that there isn't anyone who hasn't, consciously or not.

What are the Pros and Cons about mortal 18 years old to vote?

close to?
Answers: anyone who believes that there is some "right" to vote contained by federal elections or thinks we live contained by a "democracy" is a blithering idiot.

your privilege to vote in federal elections is not protected by any federal directive.

we live in a constitutional republic, not a democracy. democracy is mob rule, our system of management gives the minority a voice.

the cons to the voting age self 18 is that it has no carriage on your knowledge of our system of political affairs. just look at the ridiculous first two answers. we necessitate a test within place to Gage your understanding of the command and current events. then the better you ranking the heavier your vote weighs.
I wouldn't voice there are any cons. We live surrounded by a democracy, or mostly a democracy. Exercise your right!

You are of legal age to vote. You should be of sane mind and intelligent adequate to cast your vote to the claimant that most represents your convictions.
No cons at all! The voting age should never deviate from 18.
I purely wish more kids your age be more interested in voting.
What cons? Its your duty as an American to aid pick the next senior officer of this country. More young relatives need to vote and steal action and settle on what's right for you.

If your sales competitor is a public figure & VIP obstruct you fr sales ceremonial by fine threats, what do u do?

Answers: This really is not very different from the finishing question you asked in relation to this subject.Quite simply the answer can only be matching...put yourself first, or are you going to carry on contained by your working life anyone dictated to as to how you are going to achieve anything or return with anywhere.Inform this so called grandee if he was worth anything at adjectives he would not be the slightest bit phased by any other individual.it only say to me that he has extremely little confidence definately no drive and clearly wants the pavement made easy for him..I hold never heard of an individual man able to palm off fines on another, there is clearly something I am missing....There must be someone above this somebody so go and make clear to them that you are going for gold and if at hand any fines to pay consequently let them be compensated by the IDIOT who clearly can't perform on his own merit. If I owned the company that personage would not be on my payroll tomorrow morning, of that there is beyond a shadow of a doubt what so ever my friend..You only carry respect that you earn..How much do you respect yourself and why work for anyone who can't respect you... By the way you can also recommend this VIP that he is not an asset, he's a clear liability

Why does the goverment use a bible to sware on at courts and?

Religion is not suppose to be based on our goverment right so why do they other bring it up it certain situations god this god that .god said u cant marry like peas in a pod sex .but the church and religion is not suppose to justify our day by day lives in our goverment but it stills does .a short time ago curious
Answers: Good question. The ACLU doesn't want everything to be base on religion so they have be trying to get rid of it.
The truth is our country be founded on Christian principles. You will not be able to go and get rid of that without destroying the country as you know it. The ALCU requests you to believe that the majority of the country doesn't want Christianity and that there is separation of church and state. WRONG! They twisted the significance. Read the first amendment again. It states CONGRESS shall make no imperative. It doesn't say anything nearly separating the people from religion. It say to keep the senate out of the people's lives and not the other way around. Christianity is the proof of our government. No same sex conjugal is wrong. The people who first come here did so to get away from the rule of the King contained by England and his laws so they go to Europe and it worked for a while but finally they came to the bright world to start over. The ACLU doesn’t want you to know this, but only not long has the ACLU be able to corrupt the system. It used to be that in that was a Bible within every class room and government bureau. There were prayer meeting in Congress. The Founding Fathers go to great lengths to create a 3 mode government so that within was oversight and not a soul branch would have more power than any other. Sadly it isn’t that channel anymore. The ACLU has tried to win people to vote their mode and that didn’t work they went to the court system and started bullying their track. They have succeeded somewhat. The ACLU is atheists. They would a bit wipe Christianity off the obverse of the planet. That means getting rid of the Bible and everything it stands for. And any other symbol too. People own every right to practice freedom of religion.
Good question/point you raise. I enjoy to routinely testify in court and as a result must 'swear' on the bible. I think it's to some extent amusing, really. I have the utmost respect for the bible, the religions and inhabitants who recognize it as a religious document, but to me, it holds no intent. Neither does 'swearing' on it.

Don't get me wrong, I other swear to tell the truth and and so I do - but its got nil to do with the book on the table. I guess it's supposed to remind family of a higher power and further compel them to be honest. Maybe it comforts others by convincing them the creature who swore on a bible is less gifted of lying. So now, surrounded by theory, am I individual dishonest by placing my hand on the bible? Shouldn't we variety Muslims swear on the Qur'an, etc.?

I realize I'm answering your question next to more questions, but within really isn't an clear answer other then our rule was started by immensely religious people and near will always be traces of that see. I don't want to start a debate about religion, but isn't a non-Christian swearing on a Bible only like a Christian placing his/her foot on a peanut butter and jelly sandwich? I believe that we'll never have a 100% religion free parliament, but what we've got is much better later what it could be.
Our leaders are completely failing to separate individual belief from Reality-based secular government.

The court use of a Bible is undemocratic and unconstitutional of course, as if the employment of a chaplain for the Senate, etc. or posting religious doctrine contained by statehouses or courts.

In the case of the courtroom, you own a choice of swearing on a bible or "affirming" on your honor i most places. If you insist on your rights, I do not believe any state has the right to prohibit your refusal of the bible nor the right to deny you the recognized religion's holy book of your choice. The cross-question would be how you would gain enforcement of your rights. The usual practice would be to refuse the bible and affirm as an alternative.

The country is really screwed up. This is newly one of the ways. Don't beiev we're not under statist pseudo-religious influence. It's basically about everywhere.
I don't really get the drift what the hell marriage have to do with using a Bible to swear you will enlighten the truth in court ... but the answer to the first sector of your "question" is that usually they don't use an actual Bible anymore. They also now ask you, when you are anyone sworn in as a witness, to "swear or affirm" -- affirm plan that you declare lower than penalty of perjury that what you're just about to say "is the truth, the intact truth, and nothing but the truth."

Which countries still haven't signed the human rights act?

and WHY?
Answers: You don't sign an exploit. An act is a piece of national legislation which have to be passed by Parliament. Countries sign treaties. There are nine core treaties on human rights http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/ signed by members of the UN and the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to which contributor states of the Council of Europe are signatories. Non-signatories include Federated States of Micronesia, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Tuvalu, and Tonga.
Israel or maybe it freshly blankly ignores breaking adjectives laws

surrounded by jest they have signed up but its not worth the dissertation its written on
The question wrongly assumes at hand is one human rights act. There is a human rights conduct yourself in the UK, but as for international human rights, in that are many treaties which are portion of international law and i believe the US remains the most significant non-signatory.

All significant states enjoy signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) but the US won't sign the equally important IC on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). This is due to the definition of rights within the US, where a false distinction is made between rights.

More surprisingly, the US and Somalia are the single 2 countries in the world not to enjoy signed the Declaration of the Rights of the Child. What company the US keeps.

at hand are also regional human rights instruments, but that is another put somebody through the mill...
Team America. World Police.
Because they dont like to answer to anyone for their crimes.
I believe human rights feat causes deeply more problems than it solves

How long does a company keep your employment account in New York?

I worked for a company back in retail and I moved out but did not give identify to an emergency, I recently reapplied for a different position and I be called for an interview. What I want to know if they will enjoy record of me or will it be resembling I never worked there. This be about 6-7 yrs ago. Thanks for your back guys. I really want this job but I don't want to gamble away my time and theirs if they already have copy of my leaving lacking giving notice. Im not a unpromising employee or individual it was undesirable circumstances.
Answers: ever heard of a computer?
They own and will keep an text, and that one falls under the NON rehire status. gist when they run you SS# your name will POP right up. Sucks Huh. I dont approaching it either. All you can do is Tell HR the reason and hope and pray. It wont do any good. but you can try.

Which country violates the human rights accomplishment the LEAST?

Answers: Probably Norway or Canada.
Sweden, Norway or Switzerland but the latter screwed up last year next to a little entry called rendition flights, the worst one by far is Israel.

The baltic countries tend to be better for human rights
Vatican city.

Yes it is a country contained by its own right.


And even there, here are still a few Human Rights violations.
I would read out this is an unanswerable question on a philosophical height as well as a practical one.

On a practical height there are such things as "financial and social" human rights which, like adjectives rights in international treaties, states hold the obligation to fulfill. Since a solid standard of living is a human right under this regulation, wherever here is poverty (everywhere, i believe) human rights are being violated (strictly speaking).

On a philosophical height, and even if we only stick near civil and political rights, how do you measure violation? would it be the fewest violations by number (even if they be very serious) such as torture and detention without trial (cough, Guantanamo Bay, cough) or the smaller quantity serious violations (even if within were many) (1.2bn Chinese aren't allowed to join up unions)?

If you want a legal answer, tons countries have no judgements against them from the UN Human Rights Committee (though UK does) so it is a tie.

within response to comments above, i think you will find Turkey have had the most violation under the UNHRC, but whether you can vote this means what occur in some areas of Turkey is worse than genocide surrounded by Darfur or the Israeli treatment of Palestinians is very get underway to question.

Good query, though.
Most countries don't voilate human rights.

They only countries that do are the brutal totalitarian communist states.

More Questions and Answers:
[1773] - [740] - [263] - [2026] - [20] - [256] - [2468] - [2128] - [1464] - [1069] - [1012] - [937] - [589] - [531] - [238] - [2552] - [784] - [2164] - [596] - [1566]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: