Law Questions and Answers

Why are criminal laws are morally and ethically injustice?statuotory rape and white colar crimes may hold sent

ences of a murderer or violent criminal?

I get the impression out raged when i hear that some one who comited draud,counter fiting,forgery may spend a enthusiasm sentence in a federal prison.What ther doing is wrong and inevitability to be punished but not a long time a reasnoble sentence and also statuotory rapest may spend 20 years,30 years,or a life sentences contained by certian states.
Sex with a minor is rape its illigal and im not going to budge out of my way to do it but stautory rape=forcible rape within the eyes of the law but moraly it is injustice.Sex near children deseves a high punishmen but sex beside a teen ager is wrong and who ever dne it does deserve to go to put inside but not a decade or life sentence approaching a murderer.
I know the law is the imperative.I dont agree with the law but i follow them but i wish they be imposed fairly.
Answers: you obligation to go into a trade in equality - be a judge or legislator or something so you can get things more fair. we stipulation people contained by these positions working for fairness. work yourself into the position of being the one who make the rules or sentences.
How is sex with a teen any different than near a child?
Statuatory rape is a terrible crime and deserves the harshest of punishments. Teens are not competent to think for themselves properly and are normally manipulated by adults which leaves lifelong scar on someone who has be a victim of it.

As far as sentencing go for "white collar" crimes--it is meant to deter individuals from commiting these crimes surrounded by the first place--a first time offender of a minor (depends on the dollars and down time the person have been involved surrounded by something and the sophistication of an operation) is not going to jail for 30 years.

If someone is a repeat offender--clearly they're not getting "it" and inevitability a stiffer sentence or some sort of something that will offer the individual another alternative to making money once they are released.

White collar crimes do enjoy victims you know---we all payment a price for white collar crimes. Just because people give attention to that some insurance company comes to replace whatever is missing doesn't be set to that the crime is victimless.

Yes there are what appear to be too harsh sentences for too little of a crime, but it is not other as it seems. There are recurrently appeals and deals mortal made that the general public doesn't hear something like.

Single mother fined $220.000?

Just heard a single mother have been ordered to settle up "the music industry" $220.000US for downloading 24 songs. It makes me sick.

How something like the music industry go after the pirates contained by China, or even in the US who download, distribute and for profit go artists music. No lets budge after the single mother...Sure fine the lady a couple hundred bucks, but $220.000???

This country is sick. Just for this I wil NEVER EVER buy a compact disc again!

We should make an narrative and each of us take-home pay that woman $1 to cover her legal fees. Cause weve adjectives done it.
Answers: Get off your soap box..prohibited is illegal, we adjectives know it..and its the chance you choose to purloin, and if you get caught, capably, thats what can and does happen.
I agree

I could see a couple hundred dollar fine, but $220,000 is outrageous. This shows that music industry is greedy and hard and doesn't deserve our respect or support.
Well, she was dumb adequate to go to trial fairly than accept a plea quibble. To-date the RIAA has be rather flexible and laissez-faire in dealing near people they enjoy filed suits against. The average settlement have been for a couple of thousand dollars which is essentially just plenty to make folks stop doing it.

Just because she is a single mother does not absolve her from the reality that she broke the law. Where is it legislated that single mothers are allowed to break the decree while others cannot?
They are charging her $9,166.66 per song??????
That is sick but I guess they want to make an example out of some one
Where i stay they sold pirated are not above-board, still those CD are sold surrounded by the market once caught respectively CD or VCD are confiscated and for respectively disc will cost $1000 per piece.or jail for sooner or later with fine of $5000 bail.

What she did be wrong, but paying that sum of money is ridiculous to say. if respectively song was to cost filthy dollars per song she don't hold to pay $220,000 for 24 songs she solitary pay $1,200 that 24 songs.

Another article she can do is admit that she did download the song not knowing that she be fine so much budge to a subordinate court to settle her problem for her and the court will rule u out at $220,000 is bribery not payment of cost of the CDs
She in reality shared 1,702 songs but the lawsuit was focused on solely 24 songs. And she was offered to settle for a few thousand dollars.

It is not the certainty that she "downloaded" the songs, her mistake was that she "shared" what she downloaded thus violating copyright law.

Law, Collection agencys?

Is it illegal for collection agencies to eliminate to give you a written statement? I own been ignore them for months and am now entering a credit couseling program to remuneration off my debt. This requires me to catch an updated statement. Can Van Ru collections agency deny me a written statement by law?
Answers: According to the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act: "Within five days after you are first contacted, the collector must transport you a written notice recitation you the amount of money you owe; the name of the creditor to whom you owe the money; and what motion to take if you believe you do not owe the money."

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/cred...

Is the Situation in Jena, La proof that Jim Crow is using the even-handedness system to keep white supremacy alive?

only just curious
Answers: Racism is alive and well adjectives over the U.S.A. and its not just white on black its white and black on Latino and latino on white and black on white and throw Asians within there and its adjectives messed up, problem is you have racism surrounded by every aspect of life from reverse racism surrounded by affirmative action to racist red neck's close to the KKK you have inhabitants like the Rev. who regard as they are helping when really there of late helping to separate, every one in this world requests to learn that a Human enthusiasm is a Human Life no matter the color of at hand skin the problems in Africa and Burma are happing near no remorse but in the thriving Middle east we are all over the place creating racism for American solders, we hold fox news creating this malevolence toward Americans of middle eastern descent its a vicious circle of hate and greed. Its make to world go round
No.

"Jim Crow" law mandated separate but equal accommodation for black persons. But these separate restrooms, drinking fountains, etc., be rarely equal.

The even-handedness system for blacks in Jena is not separate, or mandate to be separate. Blacks encounter the same system as whites do.

The argument is in the region of equal treatment under a single system, not two systems.
Why is it White Supremacy? If the Jena 6 have beaten up some one who be responsible for hanging those nooses on the tree,More power to them,hopefully they knock some sense into that idiot.BUT,my understanding is they vanquish up an innocent white kid based SOLELY on his color. I'm sorry,conceivably I'm wrong BUT isnt that RACISM????????

It has become zilch more than an excuse to play the RACE CARD.NOTHING MORE.

A friend of mine was routed by 3 black guys,so,from what I'm reading in alot of these answers,It WOULD be ok for me and a few friends to jump after the first black guy we see and beat the crap out of him.Even though he did zilch wrong???Because thats what happened within LA..right????
So NO ONE would have a problem beside me and my friends doing that. Sharpton,Jackson,the hip hop community would take OUR side and protest on our behalf,right? I be determined,an eye for an eye..right????We couldnt find the ones responsible,so lets attack the first black guy we see,Like what the Jena 6 did..and its defensible?
Two separate Judiciary systems.
Whites face adjectives white juries.
Blacks obverse all white jury.
Do you understand how specifically two different systems even if all the population involved but the defendant were untouched?

What happened within Jena makes me incredibly sad. Racism is rampant surrounded by this country and indeed, in the world. I freshly never thought that it could take on such an gross form in the US again.

The sttruggle of blacks within this country has be a model to liberation movements around the world. Fight on!

Whites: You inevitability to understand that the argument for Immigrants rights and African rights is not meant against you. What is needed is equality, an ruin to racism and classism.
Peace.

Should junk food be evil?

In North America
Answers: that will not work because of freedom. the last entry we need is not permitted fritos and candy bars one sold under the table and the courts dealing next to people who violated the imperative by eating rime cream. the enforcement is a nightmare.
Not if you beieve in freedom and the thought of having personal choices.

Of course in that are those who prefer totolitarianism...
Not if you wish to live surrounded by a free country. They can have my Snickers when they pry it from my cold, comatose fingers!

.
Everything should be illegal.
You should move to China.
Huh. Ahem.

Yep.
If ancestors want to make cast-offs food illegal why don't those citizens just stop drinking it.

Oh wait...

That might be too complicated for people to hold to make a choice more or less something, Yep - better outlaw it so no choices will have to be made. (Im kid of course)
watch out, you ask and the subsequent thing you immediately some liberal will be in front of the TV cameras, truism we are doing it to "protect the children". wait a second, they are already doing it contained by some cities. no selling "junk food" next to in a unquestionable distance to schools or no hasty food with surrounded by a community.

welcome to the nanny state. the get started with cigarettes and officially owned guns. now it is open up to anything they want to go after.
No another example of Dems controlling culture.
I dont think cast-offs food is the reason for size.
sports drinks and sodas are the problem
I eat cast-offs food all the time but beside in ends
but nobody realises how much sugar and calories in sodas
A lot of empire drink nothing but sodas
Drink more marine. i will not fuss about bottled river. If you will drink water that approach good
drinking more hose down is the answer to obesity
We should verbs to eliminate the most unsafe, unhealthy, or intolerable things we do. Some day we will adjectives live in bubbles. And how long will we live afterwards? Every right, and freedom we surrender, we surrender for all adjectives generations, until the authoritarianism starts a revolution. And rights and freedoms are regained near blood.

We should resolve to mind our own business!
ILLEGAL?!?!?!?
Just don't eat it!!!!!
Yeah and own gangs and other criminals making profit bad of selling illegal funyuns and twinkies. Also its a free country, if you want to be corpulent then hey its your right! They should instruct people on why its desperate for you but prohibition never works.
Nah, it should be a penny a calorie. With a surtax for ingredients that require a chemistry degree to deciper.

You could freshly stop eating the stuff, you know.

Bait Cars are almost always placed contained by minority areas..why?

I have be watching several police shows which show segments on bait cars and how they ambush so called saloon thieves. My issue is this: for the most quantity they always show minorities stealing these cars and severely rarely show these cars within a non minority areas. Are the police perpetuating a in no doubt stigma/ stereotype that causes the medium to take plus of? Right is right and wrong is wrong. But is the portrayal of such actions equal or just for that matter?
Answers: The ask answers itself, the show is designed to appeal to a certain demographic that will respond to the demographic and targeted advert that the station inserts to make a bigger profit.
When the information shows 50% of the audience is SWM, christian, divorced, median age of 27-38, income of $45,000 then the broadcasters know who is pool liner up at the trough and feeds that demographic what they will consume.
It is not a ask of right or wrong, is a question of maximize the profit share to the fullest potential.
Far as the placing of bait cars, is a matter of statistical research also, when x number cars are stolen within or near y nouns, just close to fishing, one returns to the spot where the fish bite.
If that nouns is an economically depressed location, that is where on earth more thefts of stuff is most likely to come to pass at, in the fastest time possible.
I take your issue, yet I cannot agree that 12.9% are responsible for the crime while the 81.7% hold no part surrounded by them.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications...
It is simple math and economics, when the worker bees are happy and or settled, the queen and drones can do what they want with little if any interruptions.


I
pfffff.
That's because that's where on earth they deal drugs and steal cars.Duh!
Nothing to do next to race..
Well they could place a bait coup¨¦ on my street and leave it at hand a month with the key in the ignition and at the failure of the month the only item that woud have happen is at least one neighbor would hold called to complain the keeping was an eyesore.

They put the cars where on earth people steal them - doesn't bring in much sense to put them in areas where on earth people don't/ won't steal 'em does it?

Maybe if the relations who are so worried about the stigma/ stereotype they are developing they oughta stop stealing stuff!
You'd hold to study the records pretty thinly. No TV show shows the entire situation.

That being said, as a guy witha scope in statistics, I'd be of a mind to bet the house that these areas overlap and hence there is a strong statistical correlation:

1) What you call for "Minority Areas"
2) Poverty
3) High denisty of cars to go along near high density of population
4) Rate of sports car theft
5) History of coup¨¦ thieves contained by the area

I'd voice if you want to catch sports car thieves, dance where the sports car thieves spend most of their time.

If history shows that within are more car thieve to choose from in one small(er) nouns, then it is more well-run to use one car that might draw out any of several of them, afterwards to spread reasources all over the place surrounded by low density areas and hope for the best.

Think about it within termns of football - if the defense wants to stop the offense, they plan for wht they expect the offense might do next. They could freshly put all 11 guys on the dream line every play, but they don't, because they check out of obviously major areas uncovered if they do. Same in the shield you asked about.

That is a purely statistical answer, I hope it make some sense to you - I was trying to show that while I economically understand that it may look approaching race is a factor contained by their decisions, it may not in fact be the case. I hope it help you understand, even if it is not what you needed to hear.

And you didn't ask my opinion on whether or not it consitutes entrapment so I didn't describe you :)
they put the cars in big crime areas - I have see the same shows and they do enjoy white people stealing them too

I never focused expressly on the race of the folks - I do laughter, regardless of race, within seeing them hauled stale to jail

I also approaching the ones where a cop act like a drunk and relatives steal from them and they get pounced on - THE BEST!
This is the second time I've be to this particular category,
why? Because it's a honey pot for adjectives the racists, bigots and aversion mongers in the world. Are you kid me? Asking these
creeps anything and thinking you'll get one out of ten answers
in attendance are not motivated or fueled by hate, ignorance, or a short time ago plain stupidity is absurd! Do yourself a favor and take off these idiots to themselves...yeah, I said it!
You see it and say "they're placed surrounded by minority areas." I look at it and say "they're placed contained by high crime areas."

If you're a fisherman, you progress where the fish are. If you're a cop, you stir where the crime is.

This isn't almost stereotyping, it's about looking at olden data to predict feasible future occurrence.

P.S. They're not "so called saloon thieves." When you consciously take a saloon that's not yours and drive off contained by it, there's nothing "so called" going on for it. The person is a short time ago a thief.

(UK) Who is breaking the law if I survey copyright material on youtube?

Me, the being who uploaded the film, or both of us?

Some films are clearly copyright infringements. What if I don't know that the motion picture is a copyright infringement?
Answers: Arguably both, plus youtube itself.

Typically,youtube is gone after first (they are plenty busy with that ) :)

Then, the poster would be gone after.

Then you, especially if you made a copy and tried to share it again.

Why you at adjectives? Well, in a impressively techincal sense, there is a copy made surrounded by your computer's memory while you stream it.

But that is a low even issue for the copyright owner - much better to stop it at the source then to step after everyone who downloaded it, right?

A good place to revise about this thoughtful of stuff is http://www.chillingeffects.org
Is it ethical to view copyright infringments is what i would really close to to know? The law is a chocolate starfish!

What right (if any) do I have to mandate employer-paid healthcare in Los Angeles, California?

In instruct to avoid paying me benefits (namely health care), my employer is terminate me after seven consecutive months of full-time employment. Our employee guide states that any full-time employee is eligible to receive benefits after six months of full-time employment, but the paperwork take about thirty days to be processed by the healthcare provider so my employer squeezed an extra month of work out of me short prodiving me with insurance.

Is near a law contained by CA that mandates robustness care coverage by your employer after six months of full-time employment? If so, should I be putting up a m¨ºl¨¦e over this? Google searches on this topic are mind-boggingly convoluted, so I appreciate contained by advance any help out in answering this grill.

Thanks!
Answers: Health coverage is a benefit offered by your employer-
The waiting period for an member of staff to be eligible under an employer group health plan is determined by your employer and their insurance possessor upon the employers initial nouns of the carriers bid for coverage.
If you are terminated minus having coverage prior to your termination-you hold no rights to health coverage from your employer.
If you have health insurance at the time of your termination- you would be offered inside the first 90 days after your termination COBRA coverage- which is the same coverage as the group plan within effect with your employer individual you are responsible for the entirety of your premium- which can be very costly.

But- from what you hold described here- you have no right to robustness coverage
Under the limited facts and circumstances you provide, the answer is no, you enjoy no right to insurance.

Cameras/artists in courtrooms?

When here is a trial, I see on the news painting of people surrounded by the courtroom, but never photos or videos.

When someone attacks or yell at someone else in a courtroom, I see a video on the communication.

Why don't they show photos or videos of courtroom trials that not a soul was yell or fighting? Always single paintings?
Answers: Generally, photos and video are not allowed into the courtroom because they are too disruptive to the trial itself, as the photographers try to position themselves and their equipment for the best shot.

This is to protect the constitutional rights of the defendant.

In contrast, an artist sits gently and sketches.

Also, an artist is cheaper than a film crew.

So, in attendance is not always photo or video footage for you to see.

But if you want to see trials where on earth there is no yell or fighting, spend a light of day at the courthouse, where trials are accessible to the public.
The courtroom is supposed to be a "court of record", but (evidently) they want to control the record.

Any and adjectives photography and filming should be permitted so long as it does not disrupt the court or prejudice the jury.
It depends on the court jursidiction and moral fibre of the case whether cameras (still or moving) are allowed surrounded by the court room. If they are not, you get the painting.

The reason the medium doesn't put out pics where everything is faint and orderly is because no one watching the communication would be interested. Sex and violence trade.
It's up the discretion of the Judge. It's the Judge's courtroom, how he conducts it, according to his State's laws, is his/her business.

Of register, about the individual time outbursts occur surrounded by courtrooms is when everyone is aware that the proceedings are being film. Folks act out purposeful. It's the main plea, lots of judges don't want anything to do next to video cams or cameras of any kind within their court proceedings. It's actually asking for trouble.

Has anyone's child ever dissapeared and the local police department refused to even folder a missing person's re

Answers: I don't think they will record until the child has be missing for at least 24 hours. If its be longer than that then someone desires to go to the medium and be damn quick going on for it.
Sure - most missing kids are runaways and turn up on their own in a few days.

Why did the plice tel lyou they wouldn't appropriate a report?
for missing persons over 18 and possibly over 16 they may require a 24 hour waiting term. For anyone younger they will start looking immediately, and if they don't you put on a pedestal a holy stink!

More Questions and Answers:
[1192] - [1845] - [1336] - [237] - [540] - [2254] - [1253] - [2179] - [2506] - [2436] - [1018] - [2275] - [2069] - [650] - [682] - [1138] - [173] - [2037] - [2229] - [1338]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: