Law Questions and Answers
What Year was the US Constitution written?
I enjoy looked it up and keep getting different answers this is for a arts school report please do not say anything if you don't know what year it be Thanks:)Answers: "The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America. It be adopted on September 17, 1787, by the Constitutional Convention within Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and later ratify by conventions in respectively state in the nickname of "the People"; it has since be amended twenty-seven times. The Constitution has a inside place in American tenet and political culture. The U.S. Constitution is argued by many to be the oldest written national constitution. The handwritten, or "engrossed", inspired document is on display at the National Archives and Records Administration in Washington, D.C. The United States Constitution have 4,543 words, including the signatures, and takes approximately 30 minutes to read."
It be adopted on September 17, 1787, by the Constitutional Convention contained by Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
look at this source for info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stat...
1776 was the claim of independence
The U.S. Constitution be drafted on September 17, 1787.
It was properly ratified and become effective March 4, 1789.
The U.S. Constitution be drafted on September 17, 1787.
It was properly ratified and become effective March 4, 1789.
The first ten amendments (the "Bill of Rights") be ratified December 15, 1791.
Originally, 12 Amendments be sent to the states.only 10 be ratified..the inspired 2nd Amendment is now the 27th.
The U.S. Constitution be drafted on September 17, 1787.
It became efficient March 4, 1789.
The first ten amendments (the "Bill of Rights") were ratify December 15, 1791
I wanna say it be in 1782 or much subsequently than that.
After the colonies won the Revolutionary war, they adoped the Articles of Confederation which one-time miserably because the states were too independant. So they held a convention and adopt the constitution.
How can the constitution be written in 1776? I devise people be a little too busy war a war to be writing the adjectives law for a administration that they're not even sure is going to exist.
1787
http://www.archives.gov/national-archive...
In September 1786, commissioners from five states met in the Annapolis Convention to discuss adjustment to the Articles of Confederation that would improve commerce. They invited state representatives to convene within Philadelphia to discuss improvements to the federal government. After debate, the Congress of the Confederation endorsed the plan to revise the Articles of Confederation on February 21, 1787. Twelve states, Rhode Island self the only exception, official this invitation and sent delegates to convene surrounded by May 1787. The resolution calling the Convention specified that its purpose was to propose amendments to the Articles, but the Convention arranged to propose a rewritten Constitution. The Philadelphia Convention voted to keep the deliberations adjectives and decided to draft a fresh fundamental government design which eventually stipulated that one and only nine of the thirteen states would have to ratify for the unsullied government to move about into effect (for the participating states).
The US Constitution was written by Madison within 1787, debated at the Philadelphia Convention, and ratify by the states in 1789.
Constitution be written at a convention held during 1787. Signed by 39 of the 55 state delegates, it be submitted for ratification in September of that year.
Summer of 1787, specifically May 25 (opening day) to September 17, 1787 (day of signing). The document, after much consternation, be finally ratified within 1789. After ratification, George Washington was sworn within as President and at the first meeting of Congress, they voted to supply the Bill of Rights.
1787
1492
I thought it was contained by the 1700's like 1770's If that help at all sorry that I dont know the exact year.
What is your position on the embryonic stem cell research?
Do you think it is the equivalent of an abortion or a murder?Answers: My debate is not next to whether its the same as abortion, its does the ethical dilemma outweigh the potential honourable. It sort of the old philosophy of "Does the finish justify the means". To me the answer is yes, it does. But I influence that not from my personal opinion but from the country's opinion. Stem cell research could save lives, merely about everyone agrees next to that. However the country is back and forth on whether stem cell research is murder. Having that said, I regard as the end surrounded by this case does, approaching i said, justify the money.
ive read recently that non-embryonic stem cell research is instigation to outperfrom embroyonic stem cell research. so maybe soon this debate can termination because they wont have to use embryos. someone more knowledgable contained by this field can confirm or deny this
Do you think physical sternness is warranted against concealed camera spying?
I was covertly surveilled by a neighborhood see group.They even broadcast images of me over the internet. I very soon suffer daily humiliation. My anger is immense. How do I defuse this situation short resorting to mortal revenge?Answers: Yes, beat the crap out of them and put it on motion picture... then put it on utube.
If you be surveilled in a public place, you hold no expectation of privacy. Your best course of action is to put on your big boy pant and deal next to it like a grownup. Get counseling and explain to the shrink you're thinking about "mortal revenge," too.
If you believe some sort of compensable civil wrong have been done to you, turn seek endorsed counsel.
P.S. The answer about "libelous" video make no sense to me, as truth is an absolute defense to libel and it's VIDEO. Unless some huge falsehood be published with the video, where's the slander? Walking around acting in an degrading manner and have that be truthfully depicted in a video is not slander.
Geez! What in the world be you doing running naked into a neighbors patio or some spiritual zoned out dance within your speedo perhaps? Take your pills adjectives will be fine in the morning.
If Stacy Peterson turns up alive, will she be in trouble next to the law?
There is a accidental that she just walk away. I believe Drew did something with her body but what if...Answers: Yes, I would give attention to big time trouble. She would have to income for all the police hours spent on finding her.
If she purposely allowed an investigation to continue consequently yes she would be legally responsible for it.
Just close to the run away bride for a few years ago who allowed searches and investigations to verbs was held responsible for it to verbs. She was held responsible for the cost of the search and investigations and was criminally charges Stacy peterson would also be held adjectives.
I doubt that she is going to show up breathing, but weirder things have happen before. remember everyone thought the run away bride's husband be guilty for a while and then she showed up.
I construe the guy is a spook and is guilty but I will wait until they enjoy stone cold proof to be to harsh on him. He act so weird that I hope if he is found guilty they pocket his actions during the survey into consideration when sentencing him.
Only if she has be deliberately misleading regulation enforcement to place her husband in jeopardy...something i.e. hard to prove.
She is not obligated to contact regulation enforcement, but with the ongoing investigation of her "disappearance," if she is alive, she should send for in. But sometimes, those just confer on and don't WANT to be found. This could be the case, here.
Personally, I don't contemplate Peterson did anything. If the police had any valise at all, they would enjoy arrested Peterson. Unfortunately, rather than going to trial or to a jury, the bag has gone to the medium.
Odds are she's dead and her husband kill her. That said, if she really did walk away, there's no canon against it. If she turns up alive, all she have to do is say she be in dismay for her life, which would potential be true, so...no, probably not.
But in my assessment, I think she's motionless and Drew Peterson killed her.
The really creepy/chilling point for me is that they have a daughter name Lacey Peterson.
no, there is no imperative that says you can not wander away from a marriage,..
I need the most recent court ruling on the annihilation penalty.?
could anyone please give support to me i need the most recent court ruling on the loss penalty. it should be satisfactory to where i could summarize the majority and the dissentingAnswers: Here are the finishing 3:
June 20, 2002: Atkins vs. Virginia. A defendent who suffers from mental retardation cannot be executed
June 24, 2002: Ring vs Arizona. Unless the jury decides the sentence should be release, the judge cannot sentence a convicted defendent to wealth punishment.
March 1, 2005: Roper vs. Simmons. A defendent cannot be executed for crimes committed as a juvenile
The Court will issue a decision on fatal injection, probably in 6-8 months. This is the baggage of Baze vs.Rees. (They are scheduled to hear arguments within the case contained by early January, 2008.)
powerfully, yesterday the district court in las vegas, NV approved a motion in a income case that will be tried subsequent year. is that what you had surrounded by mind?
Making A Porno?
I Wanted To Start Making Porno Videos And Start Selling Them, But Before I Do I Wanted To Know Where Would I Be Able To Find The Laws I Must Abid By In Make Pornos And Keeping Them Not illegalAnswers: I would natter to a lawyer first and get hold of the forms you need to hold on to on file as to adjectives actors and actress have to permeate out and whet coppies of proof from them you need to copy. Then budge for it
Long Live Porn!
lol
Happy Holidays!
To film beside intentions to market the product, you obligation a permit, which no city authority will give in when you divulge its going to be a rated-X video. All porn movies you see on the market be filmed illegitimately. Once you finish filming, the subsequent step of editing, mass producing, and marketing is legal.
Porn producers evade prosecution because film porn is a misdemeanor; meaninng the law must in reality serve a warrant while you're filming, and enter your motion picture set. You must be very carefull within providing irrefutable legal documents to show the actors/actresses be all at, or beyond the age of consent (18). In 1984, Tracy Lords have used a friend's birth certificate to receive driver's license saying she be 22, when in reality, she was merely 16 at the time. Producers of her porn movies were charged near marketing child porn when it was revealed she be a minor when she started in the porn industry.
> All porn movies you see on the bazaar were film illegally.
Nonsense surrounded by the US by the first amendment.
Porn is not illegal unless it is obscene is a lawful sense.
Not matter what stage of production or distribution it is contained by.
All legit web sitems create mentino to a statute regarding keeping track of performer's ages, they almost other cite the legal code on the front page formerly you enter.
Find such a site/cite, and google it.
Also check teh web site for "Adult Video News (AVN)", the industry trade record. I am sure you will find more legal, business, and scientific advice afterwards you can fathom right now.
Who gets custody ????
My boyfriends involved within a custody battle near his ex for his three kids recently his parents approved to place a case against her due to credit card fraud at hand runs a chance that if they win the defence she will be locked up...If this is so who would get custody of the children since my boyfriend at the moment is not the one beside them will he be able to receive them or would there be a together custody situation even if she would be in detain.??Answers: How old is your boyfriend? I'm guessing he's an full-grown? Is his name on the birth certificate? If he's an adult and he's on the birth permit, he would generally be given custody, though her parents may want to row him. A family court would next have to seize involved an award custody based on the best interests of the child.
if the mom is within jail,
the kids stir somewhere
normally next to there father.
What are the consequences of being caught selling adderall?
Answers: Jail, fine, lifelong criminal history. Depending on the quantity, a felony conviction which will impact your civil rights for life span.
If you get a felony conviction, you could spend time contained by prison with some guys who are much bigger and more hostile than you are, and who may do unspeakable things to you if they suggest you are "pretty." Once you get out of prison, you will probably own a heck of a time finding a job better than dishwasher at a restaurant. It's best to stay on the straight and shrink.
Roe v. Wade(1973)?
The court ruled against Texas abortion laws.. but what be the reason? Does anyone know? Please help~~Answers: it be against the 14 admendment the equal protection clause. and that it was a constitutionally right.
The Court found an implicit right to privacy contained by the Constitution.
Are there any Canadians (or others) confused about our government's handling of environmental issues?
We have a great opportunity to be leaders in conservation and presently we are not only followers but indeed holding up the show alltogether.Why are we allowing Harper and his ostrich approach towards the pollution of the planet to dominate our national mindset instead of listen to people resembling Suzuki who have have it right all along?
Answers: Global warm must be stopped so that mankind will survive.
Again we see a one sided and naive approach to a complex problem prompted by Suzuki and the mechanical media. This issue cannot be resolved surrounded by a 30 second soundbite.
Kyoto would systematically shut down most of the oil and gas nouns in the western provinces. Kyoto would shut down the majority of starchy and medium industry within the rest of Canada.
Blindly jumping onto the Kyoto bandwagon would wreak hundreds of thousands of people to be out of work and increase the cost of both electricity and gas. This as you would expect would overload the EI safety lattice, causing taxes to dance way up making it impossible to run a business surrounded by Canada.
A better question is why should some countries such as China be allowed to "legally" take no notice of Kyoto and other countries have to discharge the price?
There is a middle ground but it involves making everyone cut emissions and certify that we must do so in a timeline that meet both environmental and societial needs. Kyoto is flawed and desires to be rebuilt. Such an agreement is needed but Kyoto is not it.
More Questions and Answers:
[1500] - [135] - [209] - [31] - [1769] - [43] - [2402] - [2370] - [751] - [2072] - [253] - [2297] - [2109] - [319] - [1939] - [2094] - [162] - [648] - [1747] - [1919]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: