Law Questions and Answers

Is the Jena 6 debate a case of reverse nouns & domestic "racial" terrorism?

I am disqusted that these young men are getting charges dropped, convictions overturned and the uninformed unaware racial biased support of Sharpton & Jackson Flunkies! The truth be told, at hand are usually circumstances, distrust & plain ole' dislike that precipitate this type of violence whether national or or otherwise, but! should an apeals court overturn a valid conviction based on tribal protesting.That's just plain crazy.. It's funny that they use the excuse of the boy self charged as an adult at 17 ( afterall, most gruesome crimes are charged at the adult plane at that age).

These Young fellows, some of whom own numerous Juvenile convictions of previous assalts alledged; Are getting a pat on the back by oodles for Knocking a victim unconsious and proceeding to see that "unconsious" victim on and in the region of the head "near shoes on". Gang violence of this humour is awful.

Oh, and for those that a shoe is not a weapon...Check your case directive.
Answers: If they beat someone up they should seize convicted and race should not be looked at one road or the other. They assaulted someone and should be charged with it and sent to lock away or juvie. By the way, lots of kids younger than 17 are charged as adults. Kids take locked up and charged for MUCH less than what these boys did. Knocking someone knocked out can get you are completely serious sentence. Kids get sent to incarcerate for throwing even one punch.
I think it most manifestly is reverse discrimination and it sickens me that culture are standing up for them when they really did commit a crime that they deserve to get punished for.
By the opening, I would say they be guilty too if they were white kids defeat up a black kid, what they did was basically wrong.

I work in a locked residential treatment center near juveniles.
it's disgusting too that charges were not like for both with equal offenses. think almost it.

i am not racist - either approach, it's just equality that i am after.
I don't see how it should be over turned,but it is going to be...If not Jena,La.is going to be just approaching L.A. was when that Rodney King Sh8t happen...There are going to start Robbing,and Burning everything..They have get to get in that ways
Now if I white men did a Black like that,,they would be raise hell,and the whites would get 20 yrs respectively,,,and nothing more said just about it.And the Black who sue and win some money for it B/C the School didn't protect them...
most definitely a defence of "DRT"

I was hurt at work, Can I sue?

I hurt my appendage at work on Monday the 17 useing a grinder. Before I began to use the tool I have asked my supervisor if there be a guard for the tool I was in the order of to use. He informed me that he had never see the tool used with a guard up to that time and informed me to be very carefull. I begin to grind for aproximatly one hour when my thumb cought a rib from the grinder wheel. the subsequent morning I told the director and was told that a guard didnt exesit one would enjoy to be made. On Wednesday my supervisor showed the oem guard for the grinder still new within the bag it come in, surrounded by the office of the man who purchased the grinderand. He did not permit anyone know that it exsisted . My thumb was just sprained but my work gloves were abraided at the cuff. Can I sue the man who didnt put the guard on within the first place? Can I sue the one who told me to work with out the guard?
Answers: Lawsuits are designed for obtaining compensation for a distrustful affect something has have on you ie. a serious bodily injury.

A judge will expected not hear the case because a sprained thumb only just constitutes serious bodily injury and the medical bills prabably aren't that expensive. HOWEVER, you ARE entitled to be compensated for the medical bills and damage to your personal equipment (gloves) recieved as a result of this incident. This is what your employer have insurance for and Worker's Compensation coverage. Now, if he refuses to compensate you, afterwards that would stand as sufficient grounds for filing a lawsuit.

Also, if you really want to pursure it, you can database a complaint with OSHA concerning tasteless use of safety equipment and negligence and they would probably love to come within and snoop, pick and prod. From that, they could file criminal charges, but again, the likeliness of that solidifying is slim.
In instruct to sue, you need to prove damages.

You probably enjoy an OSHA violation, but that won't lattice you any cash, and you may return with fired.

If you have an actual injury, you could wallet a workers comp claim.

Unless you want to get fired, I recommend not trying to sue your employer on a frivolous claim.
first of adjectives - did you report the injury? there is a statute of limitations for that. if you did not report it rapidly, they may prove you not be credible.

did you not know that you were supposed to use this appliance without a guard? if you did why did you still use it? parley to your supervisor.

inquire with a reputable worker's comp advocate.
Unfortunately, most states have workmen's comp law that preside over this issue.

They are most often surrounded by support of the company with little benefits to the member of staff.

For instance, in Oklahoma, we're a "not at fault" state...sounds worthy, right?

If you and Johnny were smoking a cigarette and the loop off the enthusiast blew the ashes in to your eye and you get burned...you could get compensated for time sour.

But, what they don't tell you, is that beside not at fault states, in that is a legal panama of what the employer can pay you for the injury, and even if they relay you, like they did my sister...pick up that 50 pound box of IV fluids or lose your position...and she did and ruptured a disc...they're not at fault.

Her natural life was ruined...and the max she could sue for be $18k and get on disability instantly.

So, check next to the laws contained by your state and see if you're a not at fault state...from what I take in, most are, and if so, you'd have a MUCH better shot have you been surrounded by a car wreck vs. this.
Depends on how scantily you were hurt.

This is negligence on the factor of the individual who did not give the guard to the supervisor.

You would enjoy had to enjoy gone to the doctor to have your paw x-rayed and examined. If the doctor states you tore ligaments or there is some type of despoil, you are eligible for worker's compensation while you are off of work.

If it become a permanent disability or durable damage you might know how to sue the company.

However, there are ramification for suing the company. If you lost your hand it would vary.

A thumb sprain should still be checked out by a hand specialist. It is better you hold your hand, thumb, and adjectives four fingers and they heal.

Do not chitchat about suing, only just go to the foot specialist.

Then if it is not good, speak to a advocate. Definitely keep this to yourself if this is the bag.
yes, you can definetly sue. if there be suppose to be a guard and there wasnt afterwards you have a skin.

it is the owner to make sure that the working enviroment is as undamaging as possible. him/her taking the chance to in recent times wing it. is a big no-no.

though i know you have a solid baggage here. i'm not sure who you would sue. the manager or the store. my guess would be the head. but you should make sure so your not wasting your time and money on court fee's and notarizing papers served. ect. adjectives this and your suing the wrong person. so craft sure first.

good luck

oh ps. when you sue? and you can one and only get adequate money to cover your medical bills. dont for get to ask for him to pay envelope for the court fee's., pain and suffering sometimes you can win extra for this.
That's a tough one. Where I work, we are not allowed to use gloves beside a grinder, so that would be a violation on your sector. All our grinders are supposed to have grinders, so that's a ruin on your supervisor's and company's part.

The company lawyer could easily turn this into human being your fault. Or at the minimum, toss it out.

We have a similar situation at work were a supervisor told his member of staff to "be careful." When working beside an unsafe tool. The supervisor automatically was fired, and the hand was given 5 days rotten subject to discharge.
Report it to OSHA. Let them do an investigation. If you are injured, see a doctor using Workman's Comp. Fill out all the paperwork only as you have stated it here.

File a complaint to OSHA.

Let it walk from their.
The first question you own, can you sue the man who didnot put the guard on in the first place? No you cannot sue the man who didnot bother to put the guard surrounded by the grinder in in attendance because, as you yourself is a grinder user, you should have set this first of all up to that time using any tool for that matter. Never hear of the usual motto in any construction site SAFETY FIRST, earlier you start to use tools inside the construction or any establishment, especially power tools which is dangerous and unsafe for non- knowledgable handling them. The company surrounded by this situation assume that as a USER you should have put the guard on the grinder in the past you used it or ask that it would be installed before using it. If none is available you hold the right not to use it or find other grinder with guard on it. Since you told the supervisor on this problem and of late told you to be very CAREFUL on handling it, you took the risk of using the grinder beside the best of your ability.

The second question-can you sue the one who told you to work short the guard? No, I donot think he is responsible on your injury for that thing.

The only one you could stir after in this bag probably the management or the company sanctuary policy regarding working on risky power tools. They are the sole managing director for the company this. But if you are asking for physical damages, you are going to have a intricate time suing for this purposes, might as well as the company for medical compensation similar to going to the hospital for the injury instead of asking for a bigger sum.

HIPPA Laws...Helpful or a Complete Joke?

What do you ladies and gentlemen think of the HIPPA law that all the doctors and hospitals are so readily abiding by in a minute?

I understand if you hold a psychiatric condition or STD you may not want the world to know about it...but own any of you been to the doctor's bureau or hospital lately and seen the rights it's taken away from you?

You can't enjoy your door open while waiting for the doctor to come into the room...HIPPA say you could overhear something.

You can't be with your loved one contained by the emergency room when they first check in...HIPPA say they may have a underground about their form they don't want you to know, but the doctor needs to know.

When your family circle member comes out of surgery, you can't see them right when they're put into their room (yeah, you've already wait umpteen hours to see them again)...HIPPA says they may own suspicious bruises and need to be reported privately.

Anyone else get the impression we should fight this since ALL our rights are gone?!?
Answers: All you have to do is bring that patient to sign the hippa form that your competent to be with them and know their information. Your making it a bigger traffic than it really is. Its to protect you, not make your duration a living hell like your making it out to be. I resembling it because its my information, and who ever I want to know my information will know it because they will have a hippa dissertation on me.
I'm sure you'd be the first one to b*tch if info got out that you didn't want.

Your insinuation that its OK to be ashamed if a mental disorder shows how shallow you are.

Go release a whale or something meaningful.
HIPPA be put into effect to protect a patients privacy. It is still our(the patients) choice if we include somebody in our treatment or not...connotation when we first check in to the ER, or only just go for a doctors stop by, we CAN choose to have somebody contained by the room with us.

HIPPA be made for doctors/nurses, and other employees as a legalized way for them to know it is not ok to discuss patients illnesses and disabilities to others. It be meant to help out us, not take away from us!
I abhor the HIPPA laws; they are a farce.
My husband is sick, too sick to hold track of the 10 different medications he take. But the medical insurance refused to hand over me any information about what they adjectives would cost because he had not given blessing for them to talk to me. I wasn't even asking more or less the meds - just roughly speaking what they would cost, because he's too sick to handle the bills. They should own given him a form when he signed up for the insurance so he could say it be okay to talk to me - but they never did. It cause endless amounts of trouble and aggravation.

Yet when the meds have to be ordered from a specialty mail-order pharmacy, those folks had no problem recitation me all roughly everything! It doesn't make any sense.
I'm not totally familar beside HIPPA, but I know people are strange. People own lies they keep from their family and friends. Maybe the woman had an abortion that her husband didn't want, and she lied to him and told him she have a miscarriage. The doctor asks her "have you ever be pregnant? I want complete details". Does she look at hubby and say "would you mind departure the room?" It's so easy for it to be on the doctor, she act like she doesn't want him to will, but she's relieved he did.

I had a problem beside my phone bill, so I called them. They asked me if I would impart them permission to look at my archives. I told them that they made those records, they be their's, so why were they asking me for consent? The representative told me it seemed really stupid to her also.

I ponder laws are made to serve a perfect purpose, then lawyes procure a hold of them and make them rediculous.
There are lots reasons somone may not want another to haev access to this information, it can be used against somone contained by an infinite number of ways in the wrong hand.

You still have the right to allow another individual, relative or loved one to be on your information release form available at every doctor or hospital you call on, thanks to HIPPA.

How can people copyright a maxim?

i had this stupid personage message me on myspace saying i cant influence this saying because it be copywritten by a girl i think hes full of crap is it true tho? can someone really copyright a aphorism?
Answers: Copyright doesn't mean a entity cannot repeat a saying or slogan. If so, you could capture sued just for singing a song while walking down the sidewalk next to your buddies.

Basically, copyright means you can't use something, usually "intelectual property", creative pieces such as a work of art, an editorial/article, somone elses music or lyrics, or even a catchy slogan printed on a vest, TO MAKE A PROFIT, if someone else owns or has already copywritten it.

You can't really copyright a phrase because words themself are public domain, not a soul owns them, but a specific creative combination of words, such as a song, or words printed in a constant artistic style so as to make them a inimitable creation of the artist/author, can be copywritten.

If she want's you to stop using her saying, communicate her to sue you, and see how far it goes. (Hint .it won't run very far)
If they didn't originally influence it, they can't.
People can copyright their own slogans, but I've never heard of a entity copyrighting a saying.
"Help, I've fall and I can't get up" is a biddable example of that.

What happends when these people die? Are they burried or cremated? Who pays for this?

When someone who does not enjoy any money or family. Someone who is homeless, Disabled or surrounded by assisted living. What happends once they die? What happends to their body and who pays for this?
Answers: The taxpayers pay for it.

Every State have a different way of handling these proceedings.

Usually the masculine is tagged "John Doe" and the feminine is tagged "Jane Doe". If not a soul claims the body for the statutory time allowed, his or her body is cremated.

I am not sure what the State does after cremation.

I do not mind paying taxes for a homeless persons burial.

This is a exceptionally sad event, which occur on a daily font.

It is a shame the United States Government spends Billions on who knows what besides period of war, and we have seeking work, homeless, mentally ill, unwanted children, etc. living within the streets.

They ignore the undesirables but are fundamentally good at creating the undesirables.
I've hear a lot of those bodies are donated to science if in that is not any sort of later wishes in their files.

Homeless, I cannot speak for, but surrounded by the case of my Aunt who just now passed away...she had lived contained by the nursing home for over 25 years...and had accumulate about $1000 of extra money that would hold been $6.00 or so a month of overage from her nursing home bills...that the nursing home set aside within her name to a funeral home, and upon her annihilation, being her decriminalized guardian (my grandma) had died a few years prior and none of her nieces and nephews save for my dad and my family would sustain...they'd have simply given a quick cremation/burial contained by an open spot contained by the cemetary...but because we helped...she be still cremated...but buried at the head of her mother's grave near her own small marker.
Seriously? You've never wondered where on earth dog food comes from?

What will happen if expresident Joseph Estrada guilty for plunder satchel do you think more rallys will see?

Answers: it might trigger some more bombing on the part of Erap and his cronies. they are, after adjectives, paid to ensure that intimidation will occur when Erap is decidedly guilty. but i'm sure the system has done adjectives measures possible to safeguard them and the people against these kind of violent protests. and the majority of the ancestors will breathe a sigh of relief for finally putting the finding on paper.

what's subsequent: whether GMA is up for impeachment for her hello garci scandal.

What are the ground of harrassment from someone elses attorney?

i had someone elses attorney telephone my phone 10 times in 15 mins and the simply message that was moved out was when the later call be placed
Answers: Sounds to me like the legal representative has too much time on his hand.

I wonder if he is billing separately for each hail as.
Sorry. That's not even close to harrassment.

Is it legal for an attorney to supervise a look in between a child and the absent parent?

Answers: If the intermediary so ordered it in a Court of Law.

Those are expensive visit!!!!

An attorney gets compensated by the hour, ouch!

What did the Absent Parent do to get this type of judgement?
Yikes!
That would be up to the consider presiding over the case and the law of your state.

Do you think that a ssn # or a birth warrant be required for public education?

Answers: Yes, completely. People use to need them to enroll within public school, but the liberals, trying to support illegals, don't want it, since that would have it in mind illegals couldn't go to our school.

I say they should obligation both.
.
of course, better but, implants for non-speaking english immigrant. ben franklin foresaw this
I think it should. As resourcefully as immunization documents. I had to pinch my 6 and 7 year olds for a TB test second year because a student from south of San Diego wasn't tested and brought it to school beside her. That was 2 months of of total nervousness.
A Social Security Number and a Birth Certificate is required for Public Education as well as the child(ren) obtain specific shots for specific illnesses. An updated picture is also very considerable these days.

With as plentiful child predators on the streets, divorced parents kidnap their children, etc.

If I was a parent, I'd enjoy a pit bull next to my child at adjectives times, even to the bathroom, and I am there too.
Birth pass is necess to register for school, but NOT an SS#.

If you run a personal ad, and you voice you want to meet someone who is large, is that illegal?

How roughly speaking if you say you want to run into a "sugar daddy" type, for a long term, mutually benefitial relationship. Is that unfair?
Answers: No, of course not. You're not selling yourself, you're only just saying you're not a cheap date, but you want a commitment.
Probably depends on where on earth you are.

BTW...Do you like ferret? I've got some spare 'squeaky toys'
Not really not permitted. But you have to be wary. There is a very fine procession between being a excess of space and being a prostitute.

How in the region of something like
"Good looking 20 something looking for a man to embezzle care of me"

Or even better, flip over to the subsequent page in the dissertation and look at the job ad, get a opportunity and stop being worthless.
Not contained by America, but I would not be so blunt about it. You could influence you want to meet a season and financial secure guy... I think stating you want someone's money is not a angelic way to bring it, could get you abundantly of negativity or no responses.

More Questions and Answers:
[1813] - [2512] - [1911] - [1487] - [2426] - [1288] - [2334] - [623] - [598] - [2508] - [2391] - [2351] - [855] - [1867] - [573] - [2550] - [2011] - [447] - [928] - [1517]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: