Law Questions and Answers
What is considered litter, and can I be fined?
My husband and I bought a lamp, and the box be too big to fit in the saloon, so he removed the item and placed it in the vehicle just fine. Well, I tried to rob the box and fit in the coup¨¦ and it wouldn't fit. So I placed the box next to the trash receptacle and some female picked it up and walked into the store complaining. Can we return with in trouble for littering? We tried to do everything possible but didn't consider of taking it back into the store. Has anyone hear of someone being fined for such?Answers: Was here room in the trash receptacle for it?
For the most sector i would say within is not much that can be done it is always possible they may call for the police but not likely. But simply as a guide line you could own crushed the box or disassembled it and then found some place to put it.
Well...it is trash and not surrounded by the proper place.so you COULD get fined.
I sincerly doubt you ever would find fined for it though.
YOU SHOULD HAVE PLACED THE BOX IN THE DUMPSTER. YOU PROBABLY WON'T BE FINED BUT SHOULD REMEMBER THIS AS A LESSON
Court proceedings for a murder trial?? What to expect?
My brother was murdered within May of this yr., & 1 of the killers be just arrested the other year. I have No concept what to expect during the court proceedings. Could some1 plz share their knowledge or personal experience's; so I know what to expect. Thank you. Any Lawyer, P.D., Prosecutor, Judge, some1 that's retired? some1? I am contained by the state of Fla. The man is charged w/ 2nd degree murder.Answers: Well, I live and work surrounded by Florida... I can tell you that this could steal a very long time to return with to court.
Following arraignment they plea not guilty and waive speedy trial while the pukes lawyer puts together a travel case. It could take months or even over a year to step to trial.
Florida is a public records state and adjectives court dockets and information are covered by the Sunshine Laws. You can go to your county Clerk Of Court web-site and track the travel case. You can go to your local Sheriff Office network site and look at the booking information.
You should also check with you counties State Attorney's Office network site and look for a link to the 'Victims Assistant'. They will answer every cross-examine you have and hold on to you completely up to date daily on the status of the travel case. They are very adjectives and I used their services all the time when I be a homicide detective.
If you want to email me what county you are in.. and who the defendant is... I will find you links, addresses and phone numbers and email them pay for.
Last, but not least... I am sooooo extraordinarily sorry to hear about your brother. I hope this defendant get what he deserves.
I sat on a jury for a murder trail. They will enjoy opening satements, from both sides, consequently the prosecutor will give the evidnece and dance through the witnesses, then the ally will do the same.
Depending on the evidence it can and usually is exceedingly upsetting to family mambers.
Good Luck, and God Bless
I am applying to a job that give me a company car. Will they find my DUI after 7 years surrounded by california ?
When I was 18 years old-fashioned I blew a .01 the morning after a night of drinking, surrounded by santa barbara county. Now i live in contra costa county. Both within California. the only punishment i get was drivers liscence suspension for 1 year. Thats it. no fines. No court. Just that.It have been 7 years and I am applying for a pharmaceutical career that gives me a company saloon and pays all my insurance and everything. I hold called 4 insurance companies to bring back quotes and to run my record and at hand is no trace of the DUI. They only check the ending 5 years.My question: When I goto apply for these job and they do a background driving check are they going to find my dui after it have been over 7 years?
I stated no on the applications, but dont want to excess my time interviewing if it comes up>HELP i need an accurate answer!
Answers: Assuming that adjectives the facts are accurate, you were NOT convicted of a DUI. In certainty, you were not convicted of any crime. A Preliminary Alcohol Screening device (a "PAS") showed that you be driving at a .01 while under 21. That can be a infringement of Vehicle Code section 23136. That is not DUI, which is VC bit 23152. However, if the PAS registered .01, it is unlikely that you would be charged, since there is a side-line of error in any trialling device, and it is very difficult to prove the charge beyond a believable doubt when the test itself is doubtful at that point.
However, the DMV does not necessitate a conviction to suspend your license. When they get a report of the PAS result of .01, they suspend your license underneath VC 13353.2. The possible error in the tryout does not matter beside DMV, because it is the test result alone which cause the suspension.
So, if you are asked whether you were CONVICTED of any offense, the answer is "no." If you did not move about to court, then nearby was not an iota conviction, and none will be shown in any register. The determination under VC 13353.2 is statutorily defined as a CIVIL situation. If, however, you are asked whether your license was ever suspended, the answer is "yes," but NOT for DUI--it be for driving at .01 when under 21--a far smaller number serious offense.
If you are not asked, it is unlikely that this suspension will appear in any transcript.
Just go for it. What do you own to lose?
Not the answer you want, I know. I just suppose you are worrying too much about this. The company motor has nought to do with it.
Either they find the incident and ponder it's bad, don't find the incident, or find it and suggest it's been long adequate time since the incident.
If it was when you be 18, I think you are going to be fine.
your biggest mistake be to lie on the application
it would own been better if you be honest about it DMV will show the DUI till the light of day you die. After 7 years if you have a verbs driving record it should not situation, odds are they will check in the past the interview. BTW a adult arrest text is a public record unless it is hermetically sealed or expunged most states will not do this for a DUI. I wonder what the above poster meant by a "standard DMV check"
no
Most dmv reports individual go backbone 3 years. and if they paid to walk back futher the restriction is 7 years.
Only if you have a felony will ANY blip show up
Why is it that family courts do not own to meet the evidence requirements of typical criminal courts?
Allowing bench to dictate peoples lives without any proof of the accusation is a complete surrender of our rights to the courts.Responses on the questions in the order of Spear's custody case clearly shows we haven't advanced much since the Salem witch trials. You ancestors need to start posting links to fund up your claims, you are making numerous unfounded accusation.
Do you really think that driving minus a license is a legitimate intention to take away ones children? Is letting ones child sit on ones knees when driving in a residential neighborhood really such a crime? Should young at heart parents be able to travel out and party?
I do not follow Spear's occupation, and obviously am not as very well informed as many posters here, but I find the conception of a judge man able to control someones enthusiasm who has not be convicted of a major crime to be substandard. From my understanding Spears have not been convicted of a DUI or any drug or alcohol charges, she simply lacks turbulent control, which is not a crime.
Answers: The proof requirement for a criminal action is "beyond a reasonable" doubt". For most civil cases, including nearest and dearest law cases the standard of proof is the "preponderance of the evidence", which simply money more likely than not.
In clan law cases, the Courts are most concerned near the protection of the children and the parents' rights usually are secondary. Courts hold taken that stance because in familial law cases, the children usually are not party to the proceeding, represented by lawyers or guardian announcement litems, and thus, do not have a "voice" surrounded by the proceeding.
If the Courts stood by while a parent conducted themselves inappropriately and did nothing to protect their children, the Court, contained by essence, would be putting the rights of the parent ahead of the children's rights. It simply is not acceptable, within most advanced societies, to allow a parent to do as they please and to expose their children to potential harm. Children are not property, resembling houses or cars. Children are individuals with rights and their right to remain nontoxic should be honored.
With respect to the Spears case, it appears that Brittany's schedule "more likely than not" expose the children to an disappointing risk of harm. She could glibly rectify this problem by attending parenting courses and controlling her substance abuse. Should she accomplish those items, she most feasible will regain significant parenting rights.
She probably either didn't cart her drug test or she former it. They wouldn't take her children away simply because she didn't get a renewed license.
Yea she didn't lift her drug test which is considered a bomb. Here's a source to back that up.
Perhaps you are not aware of the differnce between Civil and Criminal courts?
The Spears custody cases are civil matter, not criminal ones.
I haven't follwoed that closely, but at least constituent of the issue may be her failure to comply next to earler probationary terms in relation to agreements with the courts (rehab, mental condition, taking care of children, divorce/separation jargon, etc.) as well as society's expectations more or less child endangerment that apply to her as well as anyone else.
It is not close to she was keelhauled into court for no result in. It is because there is one or more legal disputes to be decided on the subject of matters the court have jurisdiction over.
Civil and Criminal courts have different standards of evidence required to support a ruling. Ask OJ about that :)
Is it hard to bring back married in California if i am underage?
I be just wondering..because i've be with this guy for over a year..and we are thinking roughly it..1'm 15..to be exact..and he's 19..plz dnt judge..i'm lately lookin for an answer..thnx =]Answers: No, not at all. If any the bride or groom is under 18, at lowest one of the minor's parents, or legal guardian, must appear next to the couple.
Certified copies of birth certificates are required.
The couple must also agenda an appointment with a counselor and after appear before a superior court believe to be.
If you are 15, it should be legally IMPOSSIBLE for you to gain married - in any state.
You are a child. You are process too young to be thinking of such things.
they wont consent to you marry in california until you are 18. im not sure if getting emancipated would assist.
Please dsont get married until you finish college and travel
You really call for to wait. It will bring in your life a complete lot easier. You need to gross sure you get the best rearing possible. Don't drop out of high university. In my religion, we have be taught this since we be little. Get good grades so you can run to college and get a flawless job that pays clad. You will be 100x happier with how your natural life will turn out. Trust me on this one, even though I am your age, i know what I am telling you is true.
What type of violence is better?
In a piece published within Townhall, Martinez defines what 'violence' is, differentiating between what he call 'sensless' violence & the sort of antagonism that at times is necessary for self defense or to recover the lives of others. Martinez maintains that nearby is a 'profound moral difference' betweeen the two & lists 5specific personal experiences surrounded by Iraq to illuminate his point (mass graves, tongueless man, adrenaline fueled fedayeen saddam, human experiment picturs & bomb making materia in a mospue. (US soldures discovered the idea for their enemies almost superhuman crazyness within fighting battle was due to the use of powerful adrenaline inducing drugs. That the zombie similar to attackers came to spar & die.)So? What violence is OK? One to be exact used to destroy or one to be exact used to save self or recover others? And what kind of terror campaign is US using in Iraq?
Answers: This is a deeply interesting question that deserves an aim and unemotional response.
Violence is violent behaviour by any flavor. What makes the use of it OK depends on the reasoning bringing up the rear it and what one's own opinion is of that reasoning. "OK violence" is irrelevant to me. Violence is solitary a means to an finishing and serves purpose. None of it is pretty and "fair fight" is an oxymoron as the nouns in a scuffle or battles hinge on exploiting shortcomings contained by your opponent by bringing as much force to take on on that weakness as possible. That is how fight are won. To paraphrase Gen Hal Moore, co-author of We Were Soldiers Once and Young; The sole purpose of an army is to break things and assassinate people. Violence should be agressive and beyond question or it is more costly than it needs to be. I know that sounds silly, but it is true. Think of the Continental Army at Valley Forge; Most be horribly equipped and most were sick, adjectives because the politicians couldn't decide whether or not to provide the army beside funding, equipment and supplies or to commit to the cause of the Revoloutionary War as a together. The Brits had up until next made a grand time of hand us defeat after overthrow because of the indecisivness of politicians.
I ramble. Suffice to say near are types of violence I one-sidedly and we collectively abhor. Torture, for example. I can't honestly say it's not influential and that at times it isn't warranted. And I unambiguously can't say I'd similar to to associate with the munificent of people who do it, but honestly, it serves a purpose.
"We sleep soundly within our beds because rough men stand all set in the dark to visit intimidation on those who would do us harm." - Winston Churchill (Not Orwell)
"I enjoy neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the vastly freedom that I provide, then question the manner contained by which I provide it." - Jack Nicholson (A Few Good Men)
There is no such thing as above-board or humane war or a carnival fight and to nickname war "just" is a political trick to be paid you feel upright about the horror you comitted. War is time of war. We're not over it as a species and it's not going away. We haven't evolved and we won't see peace in our lifetime because no matter how peace-minded you may be aware of there is other someone who feels differently. It's not smooth, sometimes we're right and sometimes we're wrong, but us folks have to want when enough is ample.
Violence used for self-defense cannot be considered violence.
All forms of belligerence are NOT acceptable.
What Saddam be doing was severe severity. It is not acceptable.
What is stirring in Iraq today, is also severity. It is not acceptable.
There are no excuses for such forms of severity, conducted by all party, Iraqis and the US military force.
no matter how this is answered it will nouns bad so it is better not to answer it beside more than this.
Necessary force.
If you saw someone being robbed and have your gun would you use it?
To help keep the person self robbed.Answers: I'd clean that clock near a quickness! The robbers head would move about right up in GUN SMOKE!
Absolutely. Depending on the situation, I would try a non-lethal shot if at all possible.
rookie...that is a right given us by the 2nd amendment. I transport a concealed weapon with a travel document. Who are you to tell me that I shouldn't?
If I thought their go was within danger. Otherwise, what is the point. You don't shoot the robber for taking a few bucks or personal items. He will go to put inside for it, as I was a witness.
Note: One cannot shoot to disable, this could possibly result contained by charges of torture. The only route is deadly force. Shoot to slay only.
yup
It would be well-mannered target practice
Yes. Hopefully, I wouldn't have to SHOOT them, though.
Brandishing it should be ample!
Not unless I thought the victim be in threat. Robbery is not a capital fault
Absolutely! I'm not saying I would shoot or destroy the robber, but I would certainly use the gun contained by hopes that it would intimidate the robber. If the robber came at me or be attacking someone, I would shoot him just to wound him until aid arrived. A shot in the leg usually does the trick.
i wouldnt use it to verbs the trigger
unless it was contained by the arm or leg
but if i killed the doomed to failure guy then
i would move about to jail. self shoot the leg or arm three or four times
You bet! I grew up around guns and have three surrounded by the house. When I travel alone, one is on the seat beside me. If I saw someone whose go was contained by danger, I sure would use that gun. But.. I would do as skilled.. Yell three warnings first while the finger is on the trigger, and fire just after that, aiming at the kneecap. All I want to do is stop that person... not gun down him.
And that's how we do it in Texas.
Only if it be a life or destruction situation, and only I lived within a reasonable State, and lone if I had a concealed missiles permit, and one and only if I had a perspective in statute enforcement or the military, and only if I have higher-up friends in the system.
We citizens are at a big disadvantage to the criminals. True.
You set the sound out up so well. Answer would be yes I would give support to defend the human being from being robbed.
Though 911 would be the correct path to handle it because you are not trained to feel putting somebodies life surrounded by danger. You are also not a moment ago putting there go in exposure, but every one around you as well.
So the correct answer would be no, unless you are trained surrounded by all areas.
The solitary time people should enjoy a gun (if you are talking around Officers), is when they are on duty -- of course - at that time it is called for to stop them...
No - one should be carrying a gun otherwise -
Left money at the table?
I went to Red Lobster closing night and my friend compensated me the $250 he owed me in a white envolope. I accidently departed the money one the table. I called today and not a soul claimed it. They refused the waiter name and refuse to review the security tape. Do i have any rights or any suggestions on what to do?Answers: Call and collaborate to the manager and next his boss. Explain that you will be reporting this to the police and will sue the store management for their refusal to aid you surrounded by recovering lost property. Also, that if you get the money stern, you will let this dropped.
It worked beside us when my daughter left her purse contained by a Ben and Jerry's. We got to look at the video and you saw the girl working walk over to the booth, and next take it to the wager on room. We had call while the girl was still working and she denied finding it.
The owner remunerated my daughter for her loss and he fired the girl.
Well if you really care in the region of the money at least show them your stratum of interest by bothering to show up. Find out who the manger was on that shift, and be in motion when s/he is there again.
But probably a polite lesson to not deal surrounded by cash is give or take a few to be learned :(
They enjoy NO duty to aid you. To get a court instruct to view the tape you'll have to show a point for the court to order it. Simply motto I left lolly their isn't going to fly. Know how many society try that one each year? Sorry but this was YOUR knock, not theirs, but your trying to make it theirs within typical fashion today.
Why doesn't it count as child mosostation whe...?
they strip search you for juvie? I devise it should!Answers: I think if you are a juvie, and you deserve a strip flush, they should shove their batton up your @$$ so you won't do it again...
****THIS WAS A JOKE!!!
WTF do you do as a juvie to deserve a strip search anyway? In adjectives of the trouble I ever caused, I own never been strip search.
because you chose by your actions to dance to juvie we have law follow them and you should be fine :)
What is wrong with RI's tenet treating 17 yr olds as adults? If you do the crime, then you do the time?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071006/ap_o...While it may be that 17 yr olds are not as grown-up as 18 year olds, I fail to see a grounds to change put a bet on. That 17 year old surrounded by LA with a diary of assault helped defeat that white boy unconscious, is lately as capable of murder as anyone and deserves a long prison possession with hardened criminals.
Answers: If you are outmoded enough to murder someone at 15, 16, or 17 and some cases even younger, your life span isn't worth a hill of beans anyway. Try them as an fully developed. In the It would depend on the crime, and major psycholgical carrying out tests and counseling should come into play.
Don't you think this may serve a lesson for most kids who start rotten on the wrong foot? If they could prove by the time they were 21 that they own been rehabilitated, worth no further trouble, completed an education and proceeded to be enrol into college then they could appeal to enjoy their record cleared.
These consequences, or the approaching should be put into action. I bet if we weren't so soft, things would procure better instead of overcrowding in prisons.
The single thing I see wrong near it is that it only go down to 17. many crimes hold a lower age for being charged as an mature. Some states or nations will dance as low as 11 depending on the violence of the crime.
More Questions and Answers:
[1152] - [386] - [849] - [854] - [1492] - [111] - [846] - [394] - [1582] - [525] - [130] - [1307] - [1422] - [228] - [1180] - [1267] - [935] - [1400] - [2257] - [1437]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: