Law Questions and Answers

My friend was busted for growing pot within his basement surrounded by Missouri, what kind of trouble could he be contained by?

My friend got busted next to 8 or 9 full grown plants that were all set to be harvested and have approx. 50 other plants from seedlings up to give or take a few a foot tall.
What is the best and worst luggage scenario? He was told he may catch it reduced to a misdemeanor, 5 years probation and a fine of maybe 20 regal, and probably no jail time, does this nouns possible? This is his first offense of any kind.
Thanks!
Answers: i'm not up to date with missouri ruling, but i'm guessing he could be looking at some serious time. damn shame though, seeing how it should be legal. i can't focus of much that's more dispicable or disturbing than people mortal incarcerated by the government for reason that just aren't pious enough. i will your friend the best.
He is going to jail and you necessitate to find friends who are not going to jail. That head crime free lives. Lucky you were not their motivation you would be in send down also...
First Offense ??? first time he got caught...

Could a person near great working ability work for the Navajo Nation Government, near a DUI on their record?

I've other wondered if people next to Dui's on their record be possible to work for them. I know it varies from state to state, but what nearly the Navajo Nation. The Navajo Nation is a sovereign nation. As well as the Hawaii's, they own their own nations. The ablility to hold the same law and same problems over the United States. So what happens to culture that want jobs that enjoy Dui's. So many nation have made mistakes and very soon have to lived beside them.
Answers: You can check with the tribal establishment, but it probably depends on the type of work. For example, I don't think someone next to too many DUIs could become a police officer.
The Navaho Nation probably does not hold good computer network with the a range of state governments, so it is comparatively possible the do not even know about DUI convictions.

While sovereign, they are inside the USA, and subject to tons US federal laws, of late like US states, similar to Hawaii are subject to them.

Bad Lawyers?

How do you get some concerned of closure when you've been mistreated by an irresponsible attorney. My divorce attourney took my retainer,($1500) then never returned my phone call, and never filed any papers on my behalf. She even layed out of work on my first court date, sending a partner within her stead who knew nil of my case. I lost custody of my children that year and the entire case swung out of my favor. I lost at every turn. Later I lost my errand and asked her to file for my child support to be refigured. She inferior to do so, and I wound up in sentence to prison. When I asked why she failed to wallet the papers, she told me it was because I owed her $1000. She never did anything for me, so why would I owe her another majestic? She did show up at my final divorce hearing, but by later the case have swung so heavily in my ex-wife's favor, that it be too late. The final audible range was her lone appearance in court near me, and it was individual to have the go-between approve our agreement.
Answers: Way to much missing information on this one two things very wrong within what info is here.
You had an agreement beside your ex and then you hired a attorney what did you expect the lawyer to do except support your agreement?
If you were not beaming with her after the first crust why hire her a second time?
Oh and it is common for lawyer to send someone from near office to represent you it is adjectives the same department.
If the second lawyer did not know anything give or take a few the case i.e. her the information on your trial is at her access .
to much missing information try the bar association. after secondary information report her to the BBS it is free and you can do it online..she botched the case and know it so is not likly to pusue you for the rest of the money. And all the rest worked out for the best. Good luck
Your ultimate sentence is confusing. "Approved your agreement"? Sounds like you have some say contained by the matter. There is other the Bar Association if you feel you hold been denied proper councel.

Has a Judge done this?

Has a judge given a girl or guy custody and you know at hand abusive and own court records to prove it but the mediate doesn't know about it?

Im not fragment in the stuff but i know nearly it and evidently the other party didnt.

THAT POOR KID immediately is in custody of an ABUSIVE PERSON..and the state wont do nil about it

SOMETIMES THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS BAD!
Answers: My experience within family courts proved to me that magistrates will issue orders in need any due process of law, any stratum of proof or validity, and even when presented next to evidence to dispute claims will refuse to alter orders within place.

The family courts hold shown that they will do anything they want under the claim that they are acting contained by the best interest of the child, but history shows that the only interest they hold is separating the parties involved from adjectives the money they can get.
Hi,

If at hand is evidence that a child is being abused next the evidence must be presented to the authorities so that the child can be removed from the abusive situation.

If someone have these records, later my suggestion is to take them to the local police or sheriff's department, they will investigate, and if they perceive the child is in exposure, then they will bid child protective services to have the child removed at once.

An emergency hearing will after be set up to see where the child will be placed and near whom. Also the child should have be appointed a law guardian, which is a special attorney from clan court, to make sure the best interest of the child is one met.

My suggestion is to contact that person as ably.

Good luck

If I make a regulation to control mass population growth and this law is. read on?

To consent to couples have as masses children as they want except that for every child after the first they must pay the price of $5000 to the system.
Do you think this will be a appropriate law? And do you estimate it will work for 3rd world countries? Do you think here will be any consequences and will people lift up opposition against it? Is nearby anything I can change in the order of it or any different suggestions about controlling mass population growth contained by a 3rd world country? And please give me a motivation for your answer.
Answers: Its terrible.

With 1 child, nearby is population decline. With baby boomers dying, this is also mass decline.

We cannot run the route of Russia, which has 140 million in a minute, but in 20 years will be down to 100 million.

USA have the lowest population density of all civilized world of 8 inhabitants per sq mile. We have room to grow, and we should grow.

We stipulation to get rear to where financally successful famalies hold no less than 3 children, satisfactory to make up for both of them, and promote a slight growth beyond that.

I am for due incentives for famalies who have more than 2 children. For respectively child above 2, give a 5 to 10k toll credit. *Notice TAX CREDIT. That means singular famalies who can afford children, who are paying taxes benefit from this. We can also assume those same will raise children properly and create the type of Americans we requirement!
Ummm idk it sounds good but our population would own a very huge decline.

Doesnt this case illustrate why child molesters attain away with it so normally?

http://www.abc15.com/news/national/story...

When a federal prosecutor is a child molester and the most vile among us who will protect the children?

notice this deem tried to get a molester sour on a minor point.
With the guy having a strong history of similar activity.

http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps...

The Judges themselves are child molesters:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.ht...

How smooth to commit crimes when the prosecutors and judges adjectives have indistinguishable agenda.
Answers: its pretty sad that we own to put up with this sickness within society and i for one keep an eye on my son
"How straightforward to commit crimes when the prosecutors and judges adjectives have equal agenda."

Calling all magistrates and Prosecutors pedophiles is pretty screwed up. Obviously, not all of them are molesters. It's freshly something that there is. They call for automatic jail time, no thing the circumstance.

Look at the priests, the politicians, etc. Like it or not, this is the real world. IT'S F***ED UP.
With those examples you hand over, I do not see the child molesters get away beside it so often.
In the ABC15 report the guy be arrested and decided he be guilty and could not face a trial. Therefore, he hung himself. In the Green Bay Press Gazette article, yes the jury found him guilty. The decree as written says it be not a crime. So the judge have to throw out the verdict. This cause two things. The DA appealed the Judges Ruling. The Wisconsin Congress is rewriting the law so this tragedy cannot develop again. In the NY Times article the Judge is under house arrest for three counts of felony child porn and topical charges are expected. He was whitewashed in a one soul election. None of these child molesters get away with anything.

Pedophiles are from adjectives walks of enthusiasm. They can be lawyers, your neighbors, your local police man, that funny looking man at the park. Or than can be even you. Please do not generalize when citing facts that solely support your side of an argument.
we are all a casualty of our societies to some degree, victims become victimizers and this vicious cycle keep repeating itself and the numbers increase geometrically. you could say that the difference between someone who is a criminal and one who is not a criminal is simply that one never get caught! we all play rolls, some more than others,IE; on the undertaking specially certain job like a police, pass judgment,priest,teacher and masses other jobs similar to these. all courts aren't molesters but they are all hypocrites since they adjectives have broken the tenet at some point! it is interesting how we think of ourselves as a apt citizens and forget the criminal deeds since we were never caught! as long as we don't bring out of this denial and stop acting and be honest at least to ourselves and adopt this fact we won't know how to deal beside these social ills! our system is sick since it is a reflexion of us! it comes next to acceptance first. peace

Let me get this Straight, If you do and have sex, after, a judge should be allowed to lift your kids away?

If you people really believe this, later you are sheeples, and you clearly are willing to surrender control of your enthusiasm to the courts. Sure, for guys, what the judge is doing to Britney is within many ways sweet revenge, but what they do to Britney today, they will be doing to adjectives of you, and your children, and your grandchildren tomorrow. All your ex has to do within the future is find someone predisposed to claim you were intoxicated or acting lewdly contained by front of your children, and you lose custody of your children, and large sums of money for custody. Never mind that the personality testifying against you might be getting adjectives kinds of rewards from your ex for their nouns, your life will very soon be controlled by a judge. There is no requirement for a trial by a jury, no requirement of evidence, nada. The courts are presently able to dictate the morals of the individual.

Wake up folks!!!!
Answers: And to think,in attendance are other children out there self abused,not fed or incarcerated in a closet or adjectives 3 among other things but since there is no medium spotlight on the mom and dad,we may never hear about them.
No but if you litter to take a drug interview and are driving around with your children contained by the car while not human being a licensed driver a judge can.

Why should celebrity be held to a lesser standard than the rest of us.
WOW are you ever rotten base...First if Britney needed a Jury all she have to do is request a trial by Jury She declined that because adjectives of the defense in the world would not support.
She had no defense at adjectives based bad her track record of multiple run ins near the police mostly drug related not to mention dui most with her children within the car.
WOW and abundant many other violation of the law. Your so within love with her that you can't see the fruitless in what she have done and fame will not erase what these things are she get less than what a adjectives joe on the street would because of her fame and fortune. why should we perceive sorry for her. Crap if anyone of use had the final ground she has we would be within prison she got sour easy permit it die. Maybe you should hire on as her defense lawyer or progress marry her or something this is not a place to get sympathy for her.
Welcome to the wonderful world of Family Law. Britney's satchel is no different than the hundreds of cases that go through domestic law courts every month. We own parents coaching the kids to say the other spouse molested them, we hold parents who are drug addicts combat to keep their kids because contained by this society a child has become the top rage acquisition approaching a designer bag.

Pity the courts in Family Court to own to hear EACH side anoint themselves to saintdom and accuse the other side of anyone in league near the devil.

Why did our UK grandfathers fight for our British Rights?

Are we clever to go to Europe?

The European Commission have just announced an agreement whereby English will be the authoritative language of the European Union a bit than German, which was the other possibility.

As segment of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling have some room for improvement and have accepted a 5-year phase-in plan that would become certain as "Euro-English."

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants skip with seventh heaven.

The hard "c" will be dropped contained by favour of "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan hold one less epistle.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced near "f". This will make words similar to fotograf 20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to realize the stage where more komplikated change are possible.

Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which enjoy always ben a deterent to akurate speling.

Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" contained by the languag is disgrasful and it should go away.

By the 4th yer individuals wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w"beside "v".

During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensi bl riten styl.

Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a integrated urop vil finali kum tru.

Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted contained by ze forst plas.
Answers: Saw this some years ago,,but worth a giggle ha ha ha
idk
im mexican
:-)
Answer: You own infact hit the proverbial nail on the come first as it were...
Does answer the age outdated question as to why the Irish held on to Gaelic doesn't it.
There'll other be an England!
Flower of Scotland
Land of My Fathers
Danny Boy

Four good reason this will never happen.

Very accurate though. I always chuckle when I see this one!
another idea to get out of that mockery of democracy they ring up the EU.
Its getting more and more pathetic next to what they dream up in europe
surrounded by answere to the first part of your give somebody the third degree. it meant some item to be British then. nearby was a pride surrounded by our country. but since mass immigration we've been made to be aware of ashamed of our culture. ashamed of our heritage. ill erudite self acclaimed , so called "experts" own persuaded us that we should variation our laws, our culture and even the opening we think and grain!! in proclaim to accommodate immigrants that we didn't even want. and an immigration policy we be never even consulted on.i dont think that our fore father could have forseen a time when Briton would be govern by traitors. and manned by cowards next to no stomach to fight for the wonderful and the country they were prepared to die for.
We should stay out of Europe. It is newly the start of the New World Order's plans.
Votelse izin storr forr uz oll !!!
Damned European Union !!!!!!!!!!
Yes! A very ancient joke and frankly the copy I heard be rather better

Where Is The Line Between Rebellion and Terrorism?

The line between a rock-solid rebellion and dread threat is that a rebellion target people within the government whereas terrorists target the innocent for start purposes.

Does this mean that if an American man or a group of Americans be to target American places of government would they be considered freedom figthers or terrorists?
Answers: i mull over that after 911 and the new law passed just around anyone who causes an uproar can be considered a terrorist!!!

that's a immensely good examine, because we are at a point in our country where on earth were around to cross the line!!!

do we tender up our liberty's and constitutional rights for the illusion of impression safe and out of harm`s way??!!!

its like when big city cops shift free reign to stop crime, then close to the show i saw a while back, Dallas swat!!!

they would draw from a call and rip apart a home crash down walls, doors, window grabbing everyone within sight bash them to the ground and dragging them outside there home!!

at tiniest 6 homes in a row, no charges, no drugs, false alarms!!!

and look at our cops within new york and L.A. corruption to the max!!!

we own to keep the checks and balance, but that means giving up your total immobilize bubble world and do not follow your leaders blindly!!

ask questions be informed, dint of late get hypnotized by the bright buoyant and pretty colors and the Hitler-like spin on things!!!!

and both democrats and republicans need to quit going to the extreme not here or right and meet somewhere within the middle!!!

cause hey if it comes down to it,ailing do fine in my underground cave!!!
No easy answer. It's a "point of view".

To the British, our Founding Fathers be terrorists and criminals, and I'm sure they would have adjectives been hung if we have lost.

I think that in the definition of 'rebellion' there are unquestionably degrees of behavior. Action against the opposition's military forces is one article, but killing innocent nation indiscriminately is another.

However, even this definition is tricky, because that would make America's military contained by Iraq as "terrorist" as the insurgents in Iraq.

I guess that modern warfare have blurred the lines between rebellion and terrorism, and it's no longer separated by clear lines.
Bush have declared the whole Iranian Military as a terrorist body.

I think to be exact a pretty thick splash that was put within place to slowly dumb down the American public into an invasion.

Thank God the military leaders now, after years of ineptitude underneath Rummy, have realize we are spread way to cracked. Just wish they would also recognize, the war on apprehension can not work as envisioned. (I'm not sold there is a concrete war, I simply do not believe the command anymore.)

Peace

Jim

.
A lot of this is in the mind of the beholder who is doing the defining.

Under the US constitution, society have the right to criticise their elected representatives, verbally and within print, what they do not have the right to do is pocket up arms against the government ... that would be a revolution, or a criminal handling.

During war, plentifully of stuff happens that some individuals may feel crosses some smudge with respect to what is an appropriate goings-on.

During WW I there be a lot of chemical weaponry used, that were intended to execute off everyone where on earth they were used.

During WW II here were attacks on cities, intended to seriously take out off most of the civilian population.

So attacks on civilian population, as anti attacks on soldiers or government, specifically not an exception to the history of warfare.

Suppose a small group of people want to own a revolution, but they cannot get much support for their motive. This effort ends up not self called a revolution, but some open-handed of criminal activity.

Suppose a nation have a revolution. If it is successful, it is called a revolution. If it is unsuccessful it is call a civil war, because history books are largely written from the perspective of the winners, or victor in conflicts.

While the revolution is within progress, the revolutionaries are sometimes called freedom fighters. This is a valid description if they are warfare for freedom against some despotic government, but it is recurrently a propaganda ploy.

South and Central America have a long history of successful revolutions, where on earth there be a despotic government, it get overthrown, and the winners imposed a untried despotic government. The revolutionaries could single be called freedom fighters until their conquest demonstrated that their goal be not freedom at all.

In traditional conflicts, the revolutionaries own some way of identify themselves ... a uniform, a badge, so citizens know who is part of the revolution, as unwilling some criminals taking advantage of the situation.

Any time you own combatants, who are not wearing a uniform, they can be presumed to be spies, terrorists, traitors, and executed in wartime lacking a trial.

Someone captured on the battlefield who is surrounded by the uniform of the other side, that person is supposed to be treated according to the Geneva Convention rules for Prisoners of War.

In some conflicts, some military forces one-time to follow the laws of period of war.

In the current war on terrorism, and recent conflicts surrounded by states collapsing into anarchy, whatever uniform or identification of some of the combatants, it be not distinct enough for disinterested party to be able to share.
Interesting question. I proposition you my opinion, which I hope help.

First off, disturbance is a political act of resistance (which can include the utilization of violence) to do political goals/reform through a popular uprising. Terror is the use of unrestricted violence against (as you said) the population en masse to do political, economic, and even religious goal. Rebellion attempts to persuade a system directly by enlarging popular support for its rationale, terror attempts to make ineffective a government indirectly by instilling shock in its citizens, thus eroding public support for a parliament.
Rebellion often aims at reform a pre-existing authority, while terror usually aims to eradicate that authority adjectives together.
Rebellion & terrorism, have nought to do w/eachother. Rockartists are considered rebellious, ok. But they`re by no medium terrorists i.e not commiting violent act against the public.

Being charged rent that I don't owe?

My girlfriend and I work at night and sleep during the hours of daylight. Recently, we were awakened by someone pounding on the door of our apartment. Half asleep, I stumbled to the pane to see who it was. I did not certify the person and head to the door. As I went to unequivocal the door, a man let himself contained by with a push button!! He was from the physical estate company we rented from and was coming within our apartment assuming we were not at home. He said that they assumed we have moved because "we haven't heard from you". Our rent be due at the time, but not late. There be no reason why they should expect to "hear from" us. We call the real estate company, but they offered no explanation as to why they would transport a stranger into our home. We decided to move. We took our rent money and get another apartment, called the material estate company, and told them we were vacate. Within a few days we were gone. This occur in untimely August. Now they have sent a registered memorandum claiming we owe them money.
Answers: You may owe rent for the last month contained by which you were within, even without a lease. Your state law have "perforation fillers" that dictate the terms of month-to-month tenant, including whether the landlord can apply the "surety deposit" to unpaid rent or if it has to be a separate claim. In other words, they own the burden of proving damages if they want to sue you. Since the apartment was summarily rented (good for them), their damages should be slim. You can also counterclaim for the invasion of privacy, and ask for one month's credit of rent for the time in which you be deprived of your "quiet enjoyment" of the rented premises. The agent should also be severely thankful you didn't name the police and have him arrested for trespassing.
You probably broke the lease agreement by moving in the past the end of your rental contract and/or not giving them sufficient perceive of your move. So if you did, yes, you owe them money.

Sufficient notice of a move is 30 days or more, not a week or so, and you want to speak to someone at the office, not a goof who shows up at your house. I've usually solely seen that lease clause for citizens who are in the military because at short awareness they could be called to be deployed. Even next, most apartment complexes require 30 days notice from the military beneficiary or spouse. If not, they lose their security deposit.

You most imagined owe the extra money for cleanup. Dirty walls, dirty carpet, dirty stove, cleaning below and behind the frige.. anything the case may be they needed to hire someone to verbs the apartment or maybe it needed to be repainted. Maybe the toilet needed to be fixed, there's a plethora of things that they could hold charged you for. You owe the money either method, but if you want to detail the charges of everything, ask them for a breakdown of how much they think you owe. In writing.
You moved instead of simply making sure they came simply after providing you sufficient notice? sheesh!

Of course you owe them money, at lowest possible for August. Consider yourself extremely lucky if you don't have to pay packet for the rest of the lease if it went beyond that.

Of course if they moved someone else surrounded by alredy, then they would hold a hard time askin gyou for that extra money beyond august because if they vote you owe, then techincally it is still yours, even if you aren't in attendance.

But grow some brains dude!
Although you did not sign a new lease, your outdated, expired lease governs. When your lease expires and you stay on, your lease is considered to be month-to-month, and adjectives of the old vocabulary apply.

Your original lease will index a bunch of reasons why the indisputable estate company may use a key to gain entry to your apartment.

The lease will also specify how much make out you must give to abandon the rental. Since you were still here in hasty August, you definitely owe for August, and since you hadn't given 30 days sense by August 1, you also owe for September.

Any monies owed would be applied to back rent (August and September) in the past being applied to damages.

More Questions and Answers:
[1979] - [1833] - [744] - [829] - [431] - [1066] - [1354] - [865] - [940] - [2157] - [2004] - [1649] - [1031] - [2397] - [4] - [1703] - [488] - [55] - [1538] - [800]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: