Law Questions and Answers
Why is Alcohol legal?
If Pot so impossible for you, why are there not statistics showing the number of death due to driving while under the influence of it? With adjectives the people that are kill and injured every year due to Alcohol consumption, shouldn't it be illegal?Answers: Because there's too much levy money to be made, the Alcohol lobby has creased too many politicians pockets and too lots people enjoy been tricked into thinking it OK and a not detrimental thing to do.
Pot is easier to trademark. Therefore, the government can't hold a monopolization on it.
People hold died from pot, just not as copious has alcohol.
Not too mention, THC have some ill-effects on the brain.
As pot does increase artistic ability within people, it also lowers IQ and logical reasoning. I'm not proverb alcohol is better, just trying to find a apology for your it being unendorsed.
Alcohol is legal because during prohibition the mob took over and cause so much crime. After the St. Valentine's Day massacre, alcohol was again court.
I agree pot should be legal and tax.
Alcohol was risky at one time. Elliot Ness and the Untouchables, speak easies, rum runners, Canadian smuggling ...
The problem with Prohibition be that people considered necessary their booze and a hidden revolution started. Organized Crime become a big player and, Chicago especially, had incredible belligerence in the streets.
Organized Crime get its big start during Prohibition and once booze was allowed again the crime organization could no longer make money of of booze and moved into drugs.
Organized Crime be always into much more than of late booze and drugs.
Because making it illegal didn't work.
Youssif's surgery - Why is it ok to plaster this all over the communication when we have HIPAA law?
You have see the story about the Iraqi boy getting surgery to repair his unsuccessfully burned face right? Well i be just wondering if the law do not apply in this shield?http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/20/burned.
Answers: The general public is front to believe many things that are not true. The market research department tells ethnic group that they don't release the information that they collect from you. Untrue, even according to the census folks. The HHS folks want you to believe that HIPAA ensure the privacy of your medical records. Also, untrue. In both these examples, the regulation only forbids the "unauthorized" release or nouns of the information (covered by the law surrounded by question) to other parties.
Please do not seize the impression that HIPAA insures that your medical information (and any financial details that may run along with it) will be protected from disclosure to other party. It is *not* so. The HIPAA law and regulations are not worded that style and they do no work that way. It cannot work that path in directive to insure absolute privacy. In some cases, your information is available to corporate entities outside the U.S.
In our country, at hand are many different entities that are involved next to the providing of healthcare services/products and, potentially, many other entities that are involved surrounded by collecting the monies to pay for those services. Your information can, and will, be exchanged, as prerequisite, in decree to facilitate the normal business functions that are involved.
If his familial agreed to release the information it doesn't matter - Hipaa law only apply if you haven't released the information to that source.
Since most of the time you own to have a photo release to transport someone's picture or video and use in it public, exp. when the subject is a child, probability are the parents ok'd the release of this info.
What makes you have a sneaking suspicion that the family didn't allow adjectives this to be released? Think of the donations they will be getting...
What year was texas..?
admit to the union?? and does it hold a slogan???Answers: The slogan of Texas: Is the Lone Star State, and we were admit to the union contained by 1845. In 1861 Texas left the league due to the Civil War, and were readmitted contained by 1866
Admission to Union: December 29, 1845
State Motto: Friendship.
Why are there directive that determine what a health perfectionism worker can and cannot do?
Answers: Public safety -- which is the argument for most laws.
The appointments of a health exactness worker directly impact the wellbeing of patients -- and for that use, the professions can be licensed, and the actions regulated for public safekeeping.
In what way do you plan? Like can a nurse do diagnosis? No, that is what a doctor go all those years to conservatory to do. You will need to be a touch more explicit.
History of Separation of powers?
Im doing a power presentation on separation of powers and we have to include the history/ environment of it. Im not sure what to do include...i have to do 12 slides- surrounded by one of the slides i included montesquieu...should I include john locke and aristotle- I know they didnt contribute as much as montesquieu but my presentation had to be 10 min long and I call for to make it longer. Also im not sure how separation of powers started,..i know it be influence by philosophers and adopted by the U.S constitution but did it enjoy origins before that? any philosophy what should i include in the history of separation of powers?Answers: A critical slide next to reference to the United States would relate to Marbury vs. Madison, the 1803 finding of the US Supreme Court which is widely seen as establishing the doctrine of separation of powers contained by the United States.
A reasonably indistinct analysis is at http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/fact...
See also: http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flas...
To DNA or not to DNA?
Just read answers regarding everyone man DNA'd and whether it's a good view. I think it is but of those who thought in attendance shouldn't be a nationwide DNA date end no-one explained why they thought that way. Having everyone's DNA taken would pinch a long time but, eventually, crimes would be much easier to solve. Innocent people would not be accuse of crimes they did not commit and in the long run criminals would realise they be going to get caught sooner a bit than later. I hear general public in the medium saying its against human rights to do this but what give or take a few the human rights of the victims of crime. Please will someone answer this question other. DNA will prove the guilty guilty and the innocent innocent so what is wrong with giving your DNA?Answers: I meditate its a great idea. I dont see how it is a infringement of human rights because if you have zilch to hide, after you will have nought to worry roughly.
As you said, it would help crimes catch solved faster, as well as abiding money on investigations so police would have more time and money to solve crime.
The solely problem I can see is that there would not be adequate prisons to hold all the extra criminals they would arrest.
Personally I dont think near is anything wrong with this, it isn't that big a leap from some of the things we hold now.
I cant see the argument from the human rights angle, because resembling you said, if you haven't done anything wrong, you have nought to fear.
It would probably solve slightly a few 'cold cases' too, simply by filtering everyone through the network
i think everyone should offer a sample of dna afterwards when a baby is bron a indication taken its only fair-minded and like you articulate people wont hold to do time for crimes they didnt commit!!
the people that are against it must enjoy something to hide.
If it be just kept inside the realms of policing for solving crimes consequently it might be ok. I worry give or take a few where the information will be sold on to. Insurance companies not insuring you because your DNA tell them you MAY get some disease similar to cancer. Or Banks not giving you a mortgage or a loan. Employers not giving you a job.
To be blunt, I don't trust the political affairs to be in control of it, or even the police for that event.
Or even, are we positive that DNA is 100% foolproof. Will we find in 10 or 20 years time that mistakes own been made because it's not as clear cut as it seem now.
There is deeply to be said positively about the DNA database, but in that are some very authentic concerns, too. For instance, once your DNA is known, your susceptibility to ailment is also known. Imagine trying to take health fastidiousness coverage if the carrier KNOWS that you will terribly likely take certain cancer or have a heart attack or some genetic disease by a certain age. Imagine a potential employer decide between two candidates and he KNOWS that one of them will be sick in a few years. There is also the potential for being "set up" for crimes by simply planting the DNA evidence on the scene. It creates the potential for a bright form of discrimination. The genetically inferior versus the genetically superior.
So, as you can see...DNA databasing is NOT simply the panacea it is made out to be.
The reason is simple, We the citizens should have power over the governing body and not the other way round.
Governments should enjoy just ample power to run the country and no more.
Ask anyone who has ever lived surrounded by a totalitarian police state whether or not it is a good entity.
Corrupt regimes would use this material to frame those society thaty were a bane of your existence to them.
The end of legitimate freedom and democracy is already in site contained by the UK, what with ID cards and fingerprinting and interviewing of adjectives passport applicants.
Remember that similar justifications hold been raise in choose of the millions of CCTV cameras that monitor our every move and yet crime remarkably vicious crime. increases daily .
If you can't be bothered to confrontation for your democratic freedoms and liberties you don't deserve them
To adjectives of those who are bleating 'if you've got nil to hide..' capably, can we come and watch you have a bath? Or watching TV? Or have intimate relations?
I thought not.
Some things are best kept to ourselves, and our DNA is the same.
When it comes to this issue, they must issue a nation-wide vote on whether DNA may be collected from individuals. There will be problems for sure, with ancestors not waning to be surrounded by the database, and that idea spreading, so in attendance would be holes in the system. It isn't flawless. However, as I have nought to hide, I would be okay beside contributing my DNA.
Hopefully them taking does not hurt. =D
Our state is rich enough to do it. Just skulk until the expensive war is over. =]
I suppose some folks don't want the government or within fact anyone to enjoy that kind of power over them, someone near knowledge of DNA could know profusely about the intimate secret within a family history, for example who was the physical father of someone else, tracing lineage that relatives might not want to have divulged medical information (hereditary weakness etc) also the documentation of evidence can be troublesome for example, consider your DNA accidently being on someone else's given name during the sampling procedure, where would you stand? what rights of denial would you own.
however i too think that DNA databases are a well-mannered idea
I have a feeling it would set an dangerous precedent and I can't see it "catching" more criminals. DNA is not 100% reliable no event what we are told. Innocent people hold been jailed on DNA evidence and next the conviction was found to be wrong.
As many as you can surmise of?
can you name our rights as american's? similar to the right to remain silent and the right to a trial by jury? things like that? as several as you can think of. its for a academy projectAnswers: Off the top of my head...
Article I Section 9 -- Habeas Corpus, Contracts Clause
Article VI -- Privileges and Immunities clause, right to representative govt contained by the states
1st Amendment -- free speech, free press, free exercise of religion, no govt establishment of religion, right to assemble, right to petition for redress of grievances
2nd Amendment -- right to bear arms (protection against federal regulation only)
3rd Amendment -- right to turn down to quarter troops in private houses
4th Amendment -- protection from unreasonable search and seizures, warrant requirements
5th Amendment -- right to opulent jury (federal only), right to own property and to get due compensation [takings clause], privilege against self incrimination, due process rights (right to be notify and opportunity to be heard), . one more.
6th Amendment -- right to a public and speedy trial, right to a jury trial within most criminal matters, right to confront my accusers and present evidence surrounded by my defense, right to counsel, . and one more.
7th Amendment -- right to a jury trial contained by civil matters next to a significant dollar damage remedy (federal only)
8th Amendment -- protection against excessive bail, right to not be subject to cruel and unsual punishment -- I infer one more.
9th Amendment -- the rights enumerated above are not the single right
13th Amendment -- right to be free from slavery, and not discriminated against based on chronological slavery
14th Amendment -- rights of birth citizenship, equal protection rights, rights to vote (absent felony conviction), state due process rights (selective incorporation)
15th Amendment -- right to vote cannot be infringed by race
Somewhere surrounded by the the higher numbers is the right to vote, not discriminated by sexual category or by age (over 18).
That's most of them -- off the top of my manager and without looking.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EDIT: The ones I missed out of the Bill of Rights -- 5th Amendment double jeopardy, 6th Amendment due process (right to be notify of the charges), and 8th Amendment no excessive fines.
Do you mean Miranda rights?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_war...
right to remain silent
right to tolerate arms
right of freedom of speech
right to trial by jury
right to remain silent
right to an attorney present during questioning
freedom of speech
the right to a speedy trial
the right to undergo arms
How many years can you gain if found guilty on a Homicide charge in Berks County PA?
Answers: The sentence for homicide vary depending on the charge. There are three degrees of himicide, form third dehree, or involuntary manslaughter, to first amount, which is premeditated murder and a capitol offense. The punisjment doesn't vary from county to county.
Like almost anywhere, you can probably receive a sentance of life contained by prison if the charge is severe enough.
Porn is it illegal?
is it crooked to get porn on limewireAnswers: Depends on the regulation in your jurisdiction. Federally, porn is off the record if a reasonable character would find it obscene.
That depends on where the porn is, or where on earth you are. If its illegal within either location consequently the answer is yes. The laws dont apply to the Internet (which is international), they with the sole purpose apply to the systems and the users that are within that law jurisdiction
What is a good website that alows me to find sexual offender in my neighbor hood?
im looking for a website that have the picture of the offender and the charges that they hold been face with.Answers: look up youre state police trellis site they are all pretty much alike. to youre left you will see sex offender list click it it will verbs up towns and countys. or you can loook by name. i be looking at the virginia sex offenders record and found a guy i work with on it creppy huh ..
Honestly, I don't conjecture those websites are a good notion. They only show you the offender, not what they've been charged near, so you could be stigmatizing someone for something completely blown out of proportion like have sex with a juvenile when they were also a pubescent. Conversely, those websites can lull you into a false sense of security by making you ruminate you know where adjectives the predators are. There are always empire out there who haven't be caught, but if you think you know who to avoid later you're more likely to consent to your guard down around everyone else.
More Questions and Answers:
[1460] - [1840] - [1286] - [1541] - [2389] - [2529] - [973] - [376] - [129] - [1007] - [2090] - [321] - [2079] - [1101] - [2160] - [2386] - [1399] - [1647] - [2225] - [1552]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: